All Posts (6512)
Sort by
For my family and friends who like KNOW:
Yesterday I went to my office then to the gym as usual. After that my husband and I went out for a walk in our neighborhood. Sometimes we go to the beach because I can park for free behind one of the offices where I work out of as well there. I only do that on the weekend. I usually park in one of the parking lots and pay one dollar for an hour. IMHO it is WAY better than at Waikiki. They ruined her. They suffocated and her sucked the life out of her.Well I love going to the beach. I actually live along a lake and have a pool. I love being NEAR water. I HAVE to be near water LOLSo when I have free time I go to the beach. This is the latest pic I took. It goes on for miles and miles and it's not POLLUTED like how they've polluted Waikiki. You can see that the setback in this picture is REASONABLE unlike in Hawai'i where they suffocate every square inch!Some people are surprised that I do not like super development. However I don't like monstrosities to be built and know that they are trying to make the islands like Manhattan... which is an island too LOLSome people have asked me why I still donate to less fortunate oiwi in SOME way. I tell them that just because there are a FEW pilau oiwi no mean that ALL oiwi are lidat. Know what I mean??? LOL I REFUSE to let the PILAU ruin it for others so don't worry. I will NOT stop donating to less fortunate oiwi in SOME way even though some pilau people are PILAU TO ME LOL No mattah!Anyway I love da beach:Latahs!
For my family and friends who like know:
Today I went to my office early to get some work done. My desk is totally cleared! Which can be difficult to manage because there are SO many papers that come into my hands LOLI actually have this written on a board that I have near my desk:"Na pilikia = Na kala"To remind myself that in my work troubles mean money to donate to MY causes LOL Yes... it amuses me.Here is a pic of good times in Hilo! It's one of my favorite pics of me LOL:Older with our cousin Sheryl Ann (love this pic too):And the back of my head these days LOL:My work epitomizes a lot and you have to be tough both mentally and physically to be in it. It's not for the thin-skinned nor for the weak.Latahs!
FYI
Local News
GMO debate begins again
Bills aim to regulate, ban modified food
by Bret Yager
Tribune-Herald Staff Writer
Multiple bills on genetically modified organisms have been introduced in the state Legislature this session, promising the debate will be kindled anew.
Some of the bills would require genetically modified whole food products to be labeled and public notification of where testing and growing are being done, and one would ban GMO taro from the state altogether.
Another bill would prevent these issues from even being taken up in the future.
House Bill 1226 introduced by House Speaker Calvin Say would prohibit the state or the counties from passing bans on genetic modification. The bill makes an exception for legislation passed before January 2009 -- such as the Hawaii County ban on GMO coffee and taro passed in October. It also exempts laws to control genetic modification of taro.
Others bills to be considered by lawmakers:
-- HB 1663 prohibits development, testing, release, importation, planting or growing of GMO taro. The bill has 13 introducers, including state Rep. Faye Hanohano, D-Puna, who signed onto three GMO-related bills. Several other Big Island lawmakers, including Reps. Mark Nakashima and Denny Coffman, are also backing GMO-related bills.
-- HB 368 requires labeling for sale or distribution of any genetically engineered whole food for human consumption, and HB 369 applies the same labeling requirement to genetically engineered fish.
-- HB 367 would force the state Department of Agriculture to notify the public of the location of fields tests and where GMO crops are being produced. A companion bill, Senate Bill 239, has the same objective.
-- Senate Bill 709 would place a moratorium on the growing GMO taro anywhere in the state.
The House bills have been referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nakashima said.
Hanohano said public notification about GMO testing and growing is a good safety net, with the same concept applying to labeling and the ban on GMO taro.
"I'm really concerned about taro and coffee," she said. "We really don't know enough about GMOs to say if they're safe or not."
Genetically modified corn and papaya "are one thing" because they've already been in use for some time, she said. But genetic engineering of new crops should be approached with caution.
"I'm leery because not enough testing has been done," Hanohano said.
It's unclear if any of the proposals will bring out the crowds like the one that jammed county offices last fall, and Honolulu is a bit further to travel than Hilo. But all indications are that postures haven't softened much on either side.
Tom Greenwell, owner of 52 acres of coffee and a contractor farmer for another 150 acres, said the need for genetic research is as pressing as ever. On Thursday, he'd gotten an e-mail from the Hawaii Coffee Growers Association about new legislation that targeted coffee.
"Our feeling is it's just not good to ban research that could potentially be helpful," Greenwell said. "If it wasn't for research, I'd have to be growing something else besides coffee."
Grafting techniques developed in the 1960s allowed him to use root stock that resists root nematodes. It allowed his farm to survive, he said.
"One day there's going to be other (diseases) that come along, and we just may have a recipe," he said. "If we don't have research, guaranteed, we won't have the recipe."
The Hawaii Coffee Growers Association will research the bills and figure out what to do next, he said.
While GMO supporters say fear of genetic engineering is overblown, GMO opponents -- including many Big Island coffee growers -- worry that contamination of their crops with altered genes would cause marketing difficulties and a loss of the coffee's specialty crop status. Detractors also say genetic engineering of foods can cause allergies and other ill health effects, while Native Hawaiians have taken a cultural stance against altering the genetics of taro, a crop they consider sacred and a part of their lineage.
Una Greenaway, a Kona organic coffee grower and outspoken opponent of GMO, said she plans to travel to the state capital for upcoming hearings on the bills. She supports the food labeling, calling it a consumer choice bill. She said the public also has the right to be notified where crop testing and growing is being done -- even though most people already know. But Say's bill to "ban the ban" bothers her.
"Why would the public pass a bill that says the Legislature can't pass a bill or respond to a situation in the future if needed?" she asked. "Why would the outer islands want to give up control of their agriculture?"
Greenaway noted HB 1226 exempts the recent county GMO coffee and taro ban and GMO taro bans in general.
"It is clearly an attempt to fragment and divide the anti-GMO forces in this state," she said.
E-mail Bret Yager at byager-@hawaiitribune-herald.com.
Some of the bills would require genetically modified whole food products to be labeled and public notification of where testing and growing are being done, and one would ban GMO taro from the state altogether.
Another bill would prevent these issues from even being taken up in the future.
House Bill 1226 introduced by House Speaker Calvin Say would prohibit the state or the counties from passing bans on genetic modification. The bill makes an exception for legislation passed before January 2009 -- such as the Hawaii County ban on GMO coffee and taro passed in October. It also exempts laws to control genetic modification of taro.
Others bills to be considered by lawmakers:
-- HB 1663 prohibits development, testing, release, importation, planting or growing of GMO taro. The bill has 13 introducers, including state Rep. Faye Hanohano, D-Puna, who signed onto three GMO-related bills. Several other Big Island lawmakers, including Reps. Mark Nakashima and Denny Coffman, are also backing GMO-related bills.
-- HB 368 requires labeling for sale or distribution of any genetically engineered whole food for human consumption, and HB 369 applies the same labeling requirement to genetically engineered fish.
-- HB 367 would force the state Department of Agriculture to notify the public of the location of fields tests and where GMO crops are being produced. A companion bill, Senate Bill 239, has the same objective.
-- Senate Bill 709 would place a moratorium on the growing GMO taro anywhere in the state.
The House bills have been referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nakashima said.
Hanohano said public notification about GMO testing and growing is a good safety net, with the same concept applying to labeling and the ban on GMO taro.
"I'm really concerned about taro and coffee," she said. "We really don't know enough about GMOs to say if they're safe or not."
Genetically modified corn and papaya "are one thing" because they've already been in use for some time, she said. But genetic engineering of new crops should be approached with caution.
"I'm leery because not enough testing has been done," Hanohano said.
It's unclear if any of the proposals will bring out the crowds like the one that jammed county offices last fall, and Honolulu is a bit further to travel than Hilo. But all indications are that postures haven't softened much on either side.
Tom Greenwell, owner of 52 acres of coffee and a contractor farmer for another 150 acres, said the need for genetic research is as pressing as ever. On Thursday, he'd gotten an e-mail from the Hawaii Coffee Growers Association about new legislation that targeted coffee.
"Our feeling is it's just not good to ban research that could potentially be helpful," Greenwell said. "If it wasn't for research, I'd have to be growing something else besides coffee."
Grafting techniques developed in the 1960s allowed him to use root stock that resists root nematodes. It allowed his farm to survive, he said.
"One day there's going to be other (diseases) that come along, and we just may have a recipe," he said. "If we don't have research, guaranteed, we won't have the recipe."
The Hawaii Coffee Growers Association will research the bills and figure out what to do next, he said.
While GMO supporters say fear of genetic engineering is overblown, GMO opponents -- including many Big Island coffee growers -- worry that contamination of their crops with altered genes would cause marketing difficulties and a loss of the coffee's specialty crop status. Detractors also say genetic engineering of foods can cause allergies and other ill health effects, while Native Hawaiians have taken a cultural stance against altering the genetics of taro, a crop they consider sacred and a part of their lineage.
Una Greenaway, a Kona organic coffee grower and outspoken opponent of GMO, said she plans to travel to the state capital for upcoming hearings on the bills. She supports the food labeling, calling it a consumer choice bill. She said the public also has the right to be notified where crop testing and growing is being done -- even though most people already know. But Say's bill to "ban the ban" bothers her.
"Why would the public pass a bill that says the Legislature can't pass a bill or respond to a situation in the future if needed?" she asked. "Why would the outer islands want to give up control of their agriculture?"
Greenaway noted HB 1226 exempts the recent county GMO coffee and taro ban and GMO taro bans in general.
"It is clearly an attempt to fragment and divide the anti-GMO forces in this state," she said.
E-mail Bret Yager at byager-@hawaiitribune-herald.com.
Copyright © 2009 - Hawaii Tribune-Herald