All Posts (6512)
- $49 promotional summer deal.
- Inter-island air fares doubling in price.
- Elimination of Aloha Airlines.
- Smoother summer-time ocean conditions.
ApparentlyHe's bringing in the big gun's on Tuesday, with the Kaua'i Police Departmentas well as the State Department of Land and Natural Resources.
It seems Ka'iulani'smeeting with the Kaua'i Police Department only came as a warning that they aren'tgoing to protect our rights as a Kanaka Maoli even with the royal patent held bythe Kauonohi descendants that never ceased to exist, and what's really sad andmore important is our rights to respectfully protect our iwi kupuna with honor againstthis HEWA land developer.
Earlier this week a mildly threatening unidentified person with the state AttorneyGeneral's office tried to serve fraudulent temporary restraining order'swith charges against parties within that same fraudulent document citing personaldamages against Joe Brescia from Kupuna Puanani Rogers, Uncle Jeff Chandler, AuntyKa'iulani Edens-Huff, Aunty Louise Sauzen, Hale Mawae, as well as 1-200 otherunnamed persons.
I think the "1-200" was just in case any other Kanaka Maoli citizens decidedto come protect their kupuna as well.
Sounds like it could be YOU too! But don'tworry it's only another fraudulent document created to strike fear into thosewho don't know how to exercise their rights yet.
Fortunately, for us if youhave been following the mo'olelo of Naue maybe you will learn how.
Joe Brescia's actions this week have been over and beyond disrespectful, notto mention illegal, despite his repeated bland heart-warming attempt for unwarrantedsympathy at the end of the article.
"“I’m not a developer, I’m just a regularguy in a very unfortunate, uncomfortable situation,” he said.
“I’ve done everythingI can to make this sensitive and respectful, and I don’t know what else can be changed.
"Unfortunate and uncomfortable situation? What can be changed? He obviously hasn'tgotten the answer from a very vocal community of Kanaka Maoli who don't wanthim to build his house over a cemetary.
What do you expect when you go above andbeyond the lines for the continued desecration of our iwi kupuna and the blatantdestruction of our connection to the rights of those iwi kupuna?The only unfortunate, uncomfortable situation is the one that Joe Brescia has manifestedand created for himself by all his HEWA! Any SANE person would not disturb theremains of a 14th century burial to put a 3 bedroom house on a piece of propertythat doesn't belong to him.
And just to put in a little disclaimer here, the original home he intended to buildwas 7,000 square foot plus, which included some 5 bedrooms.
What's even moreinteresting is the fact that Joe Brescia doesn't even intend on living on theproperty! He's just another land pimp looking to build a property then turnaround and sell that property for way more than its worth to make it profit.
He's already washed his hands clean of this situation in his mind.
But whathe doesn't know is that he's washing his hands clean with more and moreblood of Kanaka Maoli! Out damn spot, out! But the more he rubs his dirty fingerstogether, the more and more blood will stain his hands of filth.
I'm appalled that he even considers any manner of himself as being "respectful"or "doing the right thing" as he so often likes to state in his quotesto the press. He's disturbed the iwi.
He's disturbed the lives of trulyrespectable people who have been standing up for the iwi.
He's manipulatedthe state and affiliated agencies to cow down to his pathetic sob story, while heschemes new plans for attack behind closed doors with his objectionable lawyer,Walton Hong.
He's a two faced scam artist, who's only stirring up more waters, so thathe can continue to stuff blood money into his pocket and get out! His actions provelouder than his words.
Enough is enough!If he were to desecrate the bones of our people in times of old, there would beno discussion as to whether or not he could build his home.
There would be no diplomaticendeavors set in place for him to continue to scheme and manipulate other partiesinto his control.
There would be no "revised statutes" and "countyordinances" to reference and stand behind like a wimpy little kid who'shiding behind his parents leg after annoyingly picking a fight with an older sibling.
The kahuna's would allow the laws to stand in place for his crime, he wouldbe allowed ample time to escape to a city of refuge, and the warriors from thatrespective Ahupua'a and/or ohana in connection to that burial site would begiven the right to pursue him and do with him as they pleased.
Then it would come down to two situations:Hypothetical Situation (A)If he were to make it to the heiau of refuge, he would have to lay naked and prostratehimself before the Kahuna's to plead his case for entrance.
If the Kahuna ofthe heiau admitted him entrance for his guilt he would be marked with symbol andrestricted to the walls of the heiau with severe restrictions and extreme labor.
In essence, becoming a slave until he had been released of the severity of his crime,or until the ohana and or people of the ahu pua'a had ample time to ho'oponopono.
Even with the crime lifted against him, his release still meant that he would foreverlive with the mark of his crime, and forever he and his descendants would be inservice to the families who the crime was committed against.
Hypothetical situation (B)If he didn't make it to the heiau of refuge in time, well then the warriorsand ohana of those iwi who were desecrated could do with him as they pleased afterhe was captured. Any physical possession belonging to him would be seized.
(In thiscase he doesn't own anything!) There would be protocols set in place to ensuretheir actions, but as it says in countless mo'olelo it is in the iwi that holdsthe mana, and so in Joe Brescia's iwi there they would find his mana and inperforming protocol after his capture they would keep it for his crime of desecration.
Joe Brescia can not be allowed to build on these burials.
He has done nothing butto stir the waters of illegal disillusion within the illegitimate state that willonly protect the profit and property of his illegal actions that the "state"has continued to condone.
Aue!Have a read of the article and please pass on the mo'olelo of Na Hala O Naue.
For the iwi kupuna! For the people here on Kaua'i who are currently being tossedin this turbulent storm, but most importantly so that the next generation and thenext will remember that when the time came there were those who took a stand againstthe wrongdoers who gave us no choice.
To stand ku ha'aheo!Hale MawaeEo Lono!Property owner set to begin workby Michael Levine - the garden islandKa‘iulani Huff, the Kapa‘a resident who has been tent camping for nearly three monthson a Wainiha property discovered to be an ancient Hawaiian burial site in protestof planned developments, met with Kaua‘i Police Department officials Friday.
“Essentially, they wanted to warn me that they’re coming to our graveyard on Tuesday,and that — they didn’t say it out loud — but they were warning me that we’re goingto get arrested,” Huff said after the meeting.
"We did not ask her to leave, but if the developer decides they want to goin, they’ve provided all the documentation and we will be there to ensure theirlegal rights are protected, to minimize potential conflict with her (Huff’s) groupand make sure nobody gets hurt,” said KPD Assistant Chief Clayton Arinaga.
“We agreed as a department that we needed to meet with Ms.
Huff and the rest ofthe demonstrators to get on the same page and make sure we respect their right toprotest, but also to make sure they keep it peaceful,” said KPD Chief Darryl Perry.
Huff claims that the Wainiha subdivision should instead belong to her as it wasgranted to her family by the Hawaiian crown prior to American intervention.
A Jan.
31 Hawai‘i Supreme Court ruling determined that the state cannot sell anyof the 1.
2 million acres of ceded lands that once belonged to the Hawaiian monarchyuntil all claims are settled.
Huff said that “things are conspiring in our history right now” that could leadto her recovering the land.
She expects a variety of Hawaiian sovereignty groupsto join in her protest.
“We are sympathetic to her side, but we have a duty to perform our jobs,” Arinagasaid.
Landowner Joseph Brescia, according to attorney Walton Hong, has been trying tobuild a home on the land since 2001, but has been delayed by various environmental,legal and community challenges.
The Kaua‘i Island Burial Council determined in April that 30 burials discoveredon the property in a December 2007 archaeological survey must be left in place inorder for construction to begin.
Groundbreaking was rumored to start earlier this month, but contractor Ted Burkhardtand his crew left without performing any work as some 40 residents were assembledat the site in protest.
Tuesday is now rumored to be the first day of construction.
Brescia said yesterday in a phone interview that he was “considering” building a2,350-square-foot,three-bedroom home on the property and that he would likely be issuing a formalstatement this week.
“I’m not a developer, I’m just a regular guy in a very unfortunate, uncomfortablesituation,”he said.
“I’ve done everything I can to make this sensitive and respectful, andI don’t know what else can be changed .
Two years of closed-door meetings by government agencies has resulted in a new plan for the next 15 years of NWHI which detrimentally expands the human footprint in this fragile and unique 1,200-square mile marine reserve. Without your help, approval of this plan will mean construction of a "small municipality" on Midway, new cruise ships, more extractive research, and opening the NWHI to bioprospecting. The NWHI's eight-year-old citizen's advisory council will be disbanded, and we will see new Navy missile interceptions, chemical warfare simulations and sonar activities within the NWHI without any mitigations.
Is this an appropriate vision for this sacred, fragile marine area? Please take this opportunity to learn more and tell governement officials what you think of their plans!
Attend one of the many public hearings throughout June!
All hearings are 5:30-8:30 pm
June 23 (Mon) Lihu'e: Kaua'i Beach Resort
June 24 (Tue) Honolulu: Japanese Cultural Center
June 25 & 26 (Wed & Thur) Hawaii Kai: Reserve Advisory Council Meeting
June 27 (Fri) Honolulu: Board of Land and Natural Resources Hearing
Mahalo for your continued support and participation in the effort to ensure the strongest possible protections for the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands and all of Hawai'i's public trust resources!
More Background Information:
The NWHI hui has been reviewing the management plan in detail and we join with the former and current Reserve Advisory Council members, cultural practitioners, scientists, resource experts, and long-time advocates for our Kupuna Islands in their call for major changes in this Monument "development" plan.
It will take all of our voices to uphold the public's vision that there be no further human footprint on this unique wilderness. Together, we have proven that concerted public pressure can win amazing victories for this fragile and sacred place. We can do it again today! Submit your comments now and help direct management of Papahanaumok...
WHAT YOU CAN DO RIGHT NOW:
1. Sign KAHEA's Petition to Fully Implement Protections for Papahanaumokuakea,
2. Click here to submit your own comments,
3. Send this important call to action on to all your friends and family, either by forwarding this email or by clicking here,
4. Plan to attend a public hearing in your area (click to download event flyer).
Mahalo,
Us Guys at KAHEA KAHEA: The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliancekahea-alliance@hawaii.rr.com888-528-6288 toll-free phone/faxwww.kahea.org
Harvard's Gitmo Kangaroo Law School-The School for Torturers .
Read the article at http://www. globalre.. search. ca/.. index. php?.. context=va&aid=9359
Francis Boyle.. Global Research, June 16, 2008......
Boumediene v Bush, 553 U.S.
Supreme Court, June 12, 2008VersusHarvard’s Gitmo Kangaroo Law School--The School for Torturers
Not surprisingly, the January 2007 issue of the American Journal of Imperial Law--otherwise known as the self-styled American Journal of International Law but founded and still operated by U. S. State and War Departments’ apparatchiks and their professorial fellow-travelers-- published an article by Harvard Law School’s recently retired Bemis Professor of International Law Detlev Vagts (who only taught me the required course on Legal Accounting) arguing in favor of the Pentagon’s Kangaroo Courts System on Guantanamo despite the fact that they have been soundly condemned by every human rights organization and every human rights official and leader in the entire world as well as by the United States Supreme Court itself in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006).
I am not going to bother to recite here all the grievous deficiencies of the Gitmo Kangaroo Courts under International Law and U.S. Constitutional Law. But suffice it to say that the Gitmo Kangaroo Courts constitute war crimes under the Laws of War, the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949, and even the U. S. Army’s own Field Manual 27-10, The Law of Land Warfare (1956). Field Manual 27-10 was drafted for the Pentagon by my Laws of War teacher the late, great Richard R. Baxter, who was generally recognized as the world’s leading expert on that subject, which is precisely why I voluntarily chose to study International Law with him and his long-time collaborator Louis B. Sohn, and not with the bean-counter Vagts. For the entire post-World War II generation of international law students at Harvard Law School, Louis Sohn shall always be our real Bemis Professor of International Law and never the False Pretender to that Throne known as Detlev Vagts.
Since those student days I have personally appeared pro bono publico in five U.S. military courts-martial proceedings involving warfare that were organized in accordance with the Pentagon’s Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C.M.J.)--which still does not apply to the Gitmo Kangaroo Courts despite the ruling by the U. S. Supreme Court in Hamdan that the U.C.M.J. should be applied in Guantanamo--on behalf of five U. S.
military personnel who each acted as matters of courage, integrity, principle, and conscience at great risk to their freedom:
U.S. Marine Corps Corporal Jeff Paterson, the first U.S. military resister to President Bush Sr.’s genocidal war against Iraq; Army Captain Doctor Yolanda Huet-Vaughn, the highest ranking U. S. commissioned officer to be court-martialed for refusing to participate in President Bush Sr.’s genocidal war against Iraq; Captain Lawrence Rockwood, who was court-martialed by the U. S. Army for trying to stop torture in Haiti after the Clinton administration had illegally invaded that country in 1994; Army Staff Sergeant Camilo Mejia, the first U. S. military resister to be court-martialed for refusing to participate in President Bush Jr.’s war of aggression against Iraq; and Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada, the first U.S. commissioned officer to be court-martialed for his refusal to participate in President Bush Jr.’s war of aggression against Iraq.
As I can attest from my direct personal involvement, each and every one of these five courts-martial under the U.C.M.J. were Stalinist show-trials produced and directed by the Pentagon that predictably and readily degenerated into travesties of justice. These five U.C.M.J. courts-martial involving warfare each proved correct the old adage attributed to Groucho Marx that military justice is to justice as military music is to music. By comparison, the Gitmo Kangaroo Courts will not even be run in accordance with the U.C.M.J. despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan that they should be.
Whenever they are up and running the Gitmo Courts will constitute Stalinist Show Trials as well as Kangaroo Courts, and their preliminary proceedings have already proven them to be Travesties of Justice. Even worse yet, fully-functioning Stalinist Gitmo Kangaroo Courts will quickly become conveyor-belts of death for alleged and already tortured terrorist suspects along the lines of the Texas execution chamber operated by George Bush Jr. when he was the “governor” of that state and tortured to death 152 victims by means of lethal injection. Gitmo will become America’s Death Camp. But today under the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949, executing persons detained as a result of armed conflict without a fair trial before a regularly constituted court constitutes a grave war crime. To be sure, under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution Professor Vagts has the freedom to advocate war crimes so long as he does not participate in their commission, or incite them, or aid and abet them.
But precisely where is that line to be drawn for law professors?In this regard, the Harvard Law School Faculty currently has at least five professors who have advocated torture and war crimes:Vagts himself, who supported abusing the then recently captured President of Iraq Saddam Hussein despite his being publicly acknowledged to be a Prisoner of War by the Bush Jr. administration itself and thus absolutely protected by the Third Geneva Convention of 1949 and the Convention against Torture; the infamous Alan Dershowitz, a self-incriminated war criminal in his own right.
Dersh publicly acknowledged being a member of a Mossad Committee for approving the murder and assassination of Palestinians, which violates the Geneva Conventions and is thus a grave war crime; the Neo-Con Con Law non-entity known as Richard Parker;
Another one of my teachers, Waco Phil Heymann. Previously Waco Phil had been Deputy to U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, the Butcheress of Waco. Reno ordered the Waco Massacre, while Heymann orchestrated its cover-up and thus earned his well-deserved sobriquet of Waco Phil.
All those incinerated women and children!The war criminal Jack Goldsmith who while working as a lawyer for the Bush Jr. administration at both the Pentagon and later its Department of In-Justice did much of the legal spade-work designing, justifying and approving the hideous human rights atrocities that the Bush Jr. administration has inflicted on everyone after 9/11. Goldsmith and his co-felon legal colleague from the Bush Jr. administration Professor John Yoo--now desecrating Berkeley’s Law School where my friend and colleague the late, great Dean Frank Newman had taught Human Rights--are functionally analogous to Nazi Law Professor Carl Schmitt, who justified every hideous atrocity that Hitler and the Nazis inflicted on anyone.
Despite my best efforts to prevent it, the Harvard Law School Faculty and Deans hired the war criminal Goldsmith right out of the Bush Jr. administration knowing full well that he was up to his eyeballs in the Gitmo Kangaroo Courts, torture, war crimes, enforced disappearances, murder, kidnapping, and crimes against humanity, at a minimum. And when Goldsmith’s proverbial “smoking-gun” Department of In-Justice Memorandum was published by the Washington Post, Harvard Law School’s Dean Elena Kagan contemptuously boasted in response about how “proud” she was to have hired this notorious war criminal. Previously Kagan had also publicly bragged that the future of International Legal Studies at Harvard Law School would be in the “good hands” of their resident war criminal Goldsmith. How tragically true! The Neo-Conservative Harvard Law School Faculty and Deans deliberately set out to hire this Neo-Nazi legal architect of the Bush Jr. administration’s bogus and nefarious “war against terrorism” because they fully support it together with all its essential accouterments of torture, kangaroo courts, war crimes, murder, kidnapping, enforced disappearances, crimes against humanity, and Nuremburg crimes against peace.
By contrast, after the terrorist bombing of the Murrah Federal Building by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols in alleged revenge for the Waco Massacre and Cover-up by Janet Reno and Waco Phil Heymann, to the best of my recollection I do not remember that the Neo-Conservative Harvard Law School Faculty and Deans advocated kangaroo courts, torture, war crimes, and racist profiling for America’s White Judeo-Christian Males. Yet after 9/11 the fundamentally White Racist Harvard Law School Faculty and Deans have no problem with inflicting torture, kangaroo courts, war crimes, and racist profiling upon Muslims/Arabs/Asians of Color, which is exactly why they hired the war criminal Goldsmith to teach such criminal practices to their own law students and thus someday turn them into racist U. S. governmental war criminals in their own right. This is because for the most part the Harvard Law School Faculty and Deans have always been viscerally bigoted and racist against Muslims/Arabs/Asians and other People of Color since at least when I first matriculated there in September of 1971.
The Harvard Law School Faculty and Deans are no longer fit to educate Lawyers, Members of the Bar, and Officers of the Court. They are a sick joke and a demented fraud. Groucho Marx would have had a field day with them: Harvard is to Law School as Torture is to Law. The Harvard Law School Faculty and Deans torture the Law. Do not send your children or students to Harvard Law School where they will grow up to become racist war criminals! Harvard Law School is a Neo-Con cesspool.
Francis A. Boyle holds a J.D. Magna Cum Laude (1976) from Harvard Law School, and an A.M. 1978) and Ph.D. (1983) in Political Science from Harvard University. He taught for two years as a Teaching Fellow in the Harvard College, and as also an Associate at Harvard's Center for International Affairs 1976-78). He practiced tax and international tax with the Boston law firm of Bingham, Dana & Gould (1977-78). He joined the Faculty of the University of Illinois College of Law in 1978, where he currently teaches courses on Public International Law, International Human Rights, the Constitutional Law of U.S. Foreign Affairs, and Jurisprudence, having previously taught courses on Criminal Law, International Organizations, World Politics and International Law, and Latinos and the Law. He is the author of eleven books including his latest "Protesting Power:War, Resistance and Law" (Rowman & Littlefield Inc.:2008) and Breaking All The Rules: Palestine, Iraq, Iran and the Case for Impeachment" (Clarity Press: 2008).
He can be reached at: FBOYLE@LAW. UIUC. EDU
To become a Member of Global ResearchThe CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed.
For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo. comwww. globalresearch. ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo. com© Copyright Francis Boyle, Global Research, 2008The url address of this article is: www. globalresearch. ca/PrintArticle. php?articleId=9359 ..........on behalf of Boyle, FrancisFrancis A.
BoyleLaw Building504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA217-333-7954 (Voice)217-244-1478 (Fax)(personal comments only)