All Posts (6434)




9/11 Coincidences (Part One)9/11 Coincidences (Part Two)9/11 Coincidences (Part Three)..HIS ‘WHOLYNESS’ RED-X ENUNCIATES: ....911 WAS A “FALSE FLAG” OPERATION!
MNN.
Mar. 8, 2008.
After being kidnapped, suffering
unimaginable abuse in Guantanmo Bay, Egypt, Syria and in
torture chambers in Israel, his “Wholyness” the Red-X has
emerged from captivity without a bruise.
His captors
wanted him to reveal the secret of how Indigenous peoples
continue to resist the so-called “new world order” and the
“war on terror.
They could never penetrate his infinite
“Indigenality”.
He mounted the silver bird and returned to
his mountain cave where the sun never sleeps and the
stars always shine to contemplate the state of the world.
Once again his infinite “sageocity” illuminated the portals
of MNN.
His Eternal Magnificence, the Great Red-X, reminded us
that “As the keepers of the first light of the east”, the
Mohawks have the duty to protect Turtle Island.
Our iron
workers helped build the Twin Towers of the World Trade
Center.
We are compelled to seek the truth about the
demolition of the Twin Towers and Building #7 on
September 11, 2001.
This is what we know”.
The “Warriors of the 4th Dimension” were able to
deconstruct the circumstances around 911.
It was a
“false flag” operation designed by the international
banking cartel and its military and political affiliates to
perpetuate their “war that will never end in our lifetime”.
The “War Chief of the 4th Dimension” revealed to the
Great Red-X that, “Our Warrior Council omni witnessed
the corporate boardrooms and bedrooms of those who
control terrestrial affairs.
They invisibly viewed and
overheard the discussions on creating a one world
government based on fascism, martial law and
prostitution.
As David Rockefeller once said, “All we
need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept
the new world order.
” Could it be that the capture of Eliot
Spitzer in “fragrant delicto” marks the dawn of the new
world order? Also, Mayer Rothschild, private banker, said,
“Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not
who makes its laws”.
Their hurry to establish this diabolical system for the
“stranglification” of the masses reveals their irrational
fear of the return of the Kaianereh’ko:wa, the Great Law.
It ordered Turtle Island before the great confusion caused
when some Europeans got lost and washed up on our
shores.
The return of the Kaianerehkowa will herald a
time of equality, where everyone has a voice, genuine
democracy and peace.
It will wipe out war, poverty and
tyranny.
True democratic principles such as the 2/3 vote,
women’s equality and people’s referenda will underlie
decision making.
This is causing the oligarchs to shake
in their Gucci boots and sweat blood into their Armani
arm pits.
The misleading motto spun by the oligarchs is “fighting
worldwide terrorism” which really means the unleashing
of all-out martial law on the “North American Union”.
Saber rattling against Iran suggests an invasion and a
dirty bomb could be unleashed to create a second “911”
in the U.S.
Six weeks before the Twin Towers came down, the omni
Warriors saw many people affiliated with the current U.S.
administration and Federal Reserve Bank discussing how
to benefit from what are called “put option stocks”.
This
is when Wall Street traders bet on whether a company will
prosper or fail within a six week period.
If it doesn’t fail,
Trader A pays Trader B the amount of the bet.
If it falls,
Trader B pays Trader A one hundred times the amount of
the bet.
As sensed by the Warriors, the traders bet “put option
stocks” on the following 38 companies:
1)Merrill Lynch; 2)AMR; 3)American Express; 4)American
International Group; 5)AFA SA; 6)Bank of America; 7)Bank
of New York; 8)Bank 1 Corp.
; 9)Bear Stearns; 10)Boeing;
11)Carnival; 12)Chubb; 13)Cigna; 14)Citigroup; 15)Can
Financial; 16)Continental Airlines; 17)l3 Communications
Holding; 18)Leahman Brothers Holdings; 19)Lockheed
Martin; 20)Lone Star Technologies; 21)LTV Corp.
; 22)Delta
Airlines; 23)General Motors; 24)Hercules; 25)Marsh &
McLennan Coso; 26)Metlife; 27)Morgan Stanley Dean Witter;
28)Northwest Airlines; 29)Progressivecorp; 30)Raytheon
Corp [makes drone missiles]; 31)Royal Caribbean Cruises;
32)Royal Sun Alliance; 33)Southwest Airlines; 34)United
Airlines; 35)U.S. Airways; 36)Vornado Realty Trust; 37)W.R.
Grace and Co.; and 38)X.L. Capital.
The traders who bet they would fall reaped huge windfalls
and the companies got insurance after 911.
The U.S.
Securities Exchange Commission had the control
list.
They refused to release it.
It was accidentally released
to the Canadian Security Exchange Commission shortly
after 911.
Ian Mulgrew, writer for the Vancouver Sun, put
the list in an article on February 23, 2002.
It was almost
immediately taken off the internet.
Fortunately, the Red-X telepathically stimulated the intuition
of earthly Warrior, Splitting-the-Sky.
He diligently hand wrote
the list from the internet and put it on his fridge right away.
Another article came into his realm.
Bill Bergman was working
for the Chicago “Federal Reserve” and was fired after
investigating the suspicious “put option stocks”.
Splitting-
the-Sky, being the brilliant researching Mohawk that he is,
thought, “Why was he fired for looking into these “prophets
of death” stocks?
He was driven to google “who owns the Federal Reserve?”
To his amazement, a list appeared that included two
prominent banker families, Lord Rothschild of the Bank
of England and David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan.
He saw that many of the 38 corporations that went down
were on the Federal Reserve list.
Trillions of dollars were
made at the expense of over 3000 lives lost in the Twin
Towers, hundreds of thousands of soldiers and people
killed in Iraq and Afganistan and still counting.
The Red-X mused, “What is the real story? 19 Saudis flying
planes into those buildings and diesel fuel melting the steel
just doesn’t cut it!”
The Towers were an asbestos bombshell.
Like many built
in the 1970s, they were constructed with vast quantities of
cancer causing asbestos.
Law suits were imminent.
Removing it would cost possibly as much as the value of
the buildings.
It would be cheaper to set demolition
explosives and blow the place apart, either accidentally or
as a terrorist act.
The insurance and put option stocks
could then be collected by the traders and the companies.
In January 2001 Larry Silverstein made a $2.
3 billion bid
for the World Trade Center.
On July 24 the New York
Port Authority accepted the offer.
Silverstein took out
an insurance policy that covered “terrorist attacks”!!
When the Towers came down, Silverstein was awarded
almost $5 billion from 9 different insurance companies,
with the help of Elliott Spitzer.
It was heard that vigilant
Larry also took out insurance on the Sears Building in
Chicago.
So Watch out!
StrataJet was in the Towers weeks before 911, which
could have been enough time to wire up the building.
Closing a number of the floors for weeks at a time was
called “upgrading”.
George Bush’s brother, Marvin,
headed StrataJet Security, held the two year security
contract on the Towers which conveniently ended on
September 11, 2001.
After that there was nothing to
secure.
The Warriors of the 4th Dimension decided to put the
spot light on the NYC rats.
The Mayor, Rudy Guiliani,
had a bunker on the 23rd floor of the World Trade
Center #7 Building.
Red-X was not surprised to learn
that this building went down with all kinds of CIA,
Department of Defense and SEC records of 30 to 40
money laundering cases.
The video, “Loose Change” claims remote controlled
cruise missiles were fired into those buildings just
before the nose of the planes hit the buildings.
This
caused people to look up into the sky while the real
destruction was being done at the bottom of the
building.
Left were pools of molten steel that
smoldered for months.
The warriors of the 4th dimension have been
wondering if it was possible that a hydrogen bomb
was used to destroy those buildings.
Witnesses
saw squibs of smoke projecting outwards from
each floor that was blown up.
Millions of degrees
of heat were generated that exploded upwards
which vaporized everything in its upward journey.
No bodies, no computers, no desks, no cement.
Everything was pulverized into a hot white fine
powder.
The War Council of the 4th Dimension heard how
easy it would be to set up explosives on every 4th
floor.
When detonated by thermite by remote
control, the steel would be severed into 34 ft. pieces.
This would make it easier to pick up and haul away.
Guiliani did not allow an independent investigation
of the area.
Apparently the metal was hauled to
China and Asia and melted down and made into war
ships.
The Mohawks can never rest until the full story is
told.
What do you think? There has to be a reason
why the Great Red-X was captured and tortured for
so long! Is it sheer malevolence or was there
something else to it?
Kahentinetha Horn
MNN Mohawk Nation News
Contact Splitting_the_Sky@yahoo. com
See the “Prophets of Death” by Tom Flocco;
Michael Rupert: “Crossing the Rubicon”; “
Who Owns the Federal Reserve?”; and
“Loose Change”; “End Game”; Zeitgiest”:
all on internet.
See Category: “ Red X “
New MNN Books Available Now!
The books below, email us:
Mohawk Warriors Three - The Trial of Lasagna, Noriega, 20/20
$20.
00 usd
The On-Going Confusion between The Great Law and The Handsome Lake Code
$20.
00 usd
The Agonizing Death of "Colonialism" and "Federal Indian Law" in Kaianere'ko:wa/Great Law Territory
$20.
00 usd
Who's Sorry Now? The good, the bad and the unapologetic Mohawks of Kanehsatake
$20.
00 usd
Rebuilding the Iroquois Confederacy
Karoniaktajeh
$10 usd
Warriors Hand Book
Karoniaktajeh
$10 usd
Mail checks and money orders to...
MNN
P.O.
Box 991
Kahnawake, QC J0L 1B0
Purchase t-shirts, mugs and more at our CafePress Store
http://www. cafepress. com/mohawknews
Subscribe to MNN for breaking news updates
http://www. mohawknationnews. com/news/subscription. php
Sign Women Title Holders petition!
http://www. ipetitions. com/petition/Iroquois
Link to MNN
Get the code and banners to link to Mohawk Nation News.
http://www. mohawknationnews. com/pg. php?page=promote. html
Your Support
Make a contribution to our newsgroup.
Secure your online transaction with PayPal®.
http://www. mohawknationnews. com/pg. php?page=donate. html
Nia:wen,
Kahentinetha Horn
Speaking & Contemporary Native Issues Workshops
Katenies
Manager
Stay tuned!
.. ..


Nini'ane
Press Release: New Research Reveals Widespread GMO Contamination and Threatsto Local Agriculture From the World's First Commercially Planted GeneticallyEngineered TreeNews Release: Embargo 00:01 September 9 2004Contact: Melanie Bondera, Hawaii GEAN +1 808 640-1643 or Noli Hoye,GMO-Free Kauai +1 808 651-9603New Research Reveals Widespread GMO Contamination and Threats toLocal Agriculture From the World's First Commercially PlantedGenetically Engineered TreeOutraged Farmers, Consumers and Backyard Papaya Growers ReturnContaminated Papayas to the University of Hawaii in Crop DumpHilo, Hawaii -- Independent laboratory testing results released todayreveal widespread contamination from the world's first commerciallyplanted genetically engineered tree, the papaya, on Oahu, the BigIsland, and Kauai. Contamination was also found in the stock ofnon-genetically engineered seeds being sold commercially by theUniversity of Hawaii.Farmers, health professionals, concerned citizens, and University ofHawaii scientists joined GMO-Free Hawaii in announcing the shockingresults of their research at the University of Hawaii, which createdand released the GMO papaya. Dozens of outraged farmers, consumersand backyard growers brought their contaminated papayas back to theuniversity to underscore their demand that UH provide a plan forcleaning up papaya contamination. The campaign also called forliability protection for local growers and the prevention of GMOcontamination of other Hawaiian commodity crops.All samples were tested by Genetic ID, one of the world's leadingscientific laboratories for genetic contamination testing. Compositesamples from the Big Island and Oahu both revealed GMO contamination.Nearly 20,000 papaya seeds from across the Big Island, 80% of whichcame from organic farms and the rest from backyard gardens or wildtrees, showed a contamination level of 50%. Oahu's composite ofpapayas, primarily from organic farms, showed contamination of over5%, and trace levels of contamination were found on an organic farmon Kauai. One package of seed of the Solo Waimanalo papaya, anon-genetically engineered variety purchased directly from theUniversity of Hawaii, also tested positive for GMO contamination."It is an outrage that UH is selling contaminated papaya seeds toour local farmers and growers," said Toi Lahti, an organic farmer andpapaya grower from the Big Island. "Not only could organic farmerslose their certification by growing genetically engineered papayas,GMO papaya seeds are also patented by Monsanto among others. Thisopens farmers to lawsuits for growing GMOs without paying patent feesfirst, even if they planted them without their knowledge.""These tests indicate that UH's non-GMO seed stock is contaminated,and so there can be no doubt that the University must take immediateaction to protect farmers, con sumers and the environment," said MarkQuery of GMO-Free Hawaii. "Papaya contamination is a case study inthe threat that GMO contamination presents to local agriculture. Itis now obvious that coexistence of traditional and GMO crops isimpossible."Farmers raised concerns about the impact the contamination crisiscould have on export markets, particularly to countries like Japanthat have stringent regulations about importing geneticallyengineered crops. "The Big Island is home to most of the commercialGMO papaya fields in the state," said Melanie Bondera, a farmer fromKona and member of the Hawaii Genetic Engineering Action Network."The continued planting of GMO crops risk giving Hawaiian agriculturean undeservedly bad reputation in major export markets around theworld."Dr. Lorrin Pang, MD, MPH, a public health specialist, discussedpotential human health threats posed by the GMO papaya and other GMOfoods, inc luding increased antibiotic resistance and unexpectedallergenic reactions. "All of these concerns are troubling inthemselves, but they would be less worrisome if the GMO mutations didnot spread beyond our intentions. Today's report shows that theydo," Dr. Pang said. "If a health problem arises that is attributableto GMO foods, it will be impossible to recall such a live, dangerousmutation once it has been released into the environment."Dr. Hector Valenzuela, a scientist specializing in tropical cropsfrom UH Manoa's Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences,asserted that the University's focus on promoting genetic engineeringis steering Hawaiian agriculture in the wrong direction. "Instead ofsupporting untested technologies like genetic engineering, theUniversity of Hawaii should redirect their resources to focus onresearching and promoting workable, non-GMO solutions to localagricultural problems. Hawaii farmers need agricultural advancesthat can protect their farms and our state's agricultural economyover the long run."Bondera outlined the campaign being launched by GMO-Free Hawaii basedon these contamination results. "Despite the problems local growershave had with the GMO papaya, the University is now geneticallyengineering taro, pineapple, banana, sugarcane, and other commoditycrops," said Bondera. "The problems with GMO papaya contaminationshow us that there are too many unanswered questions aboutagricultural biotech to be releasing new experimental geneticallyengineered organisms into our environment. Hawaiian farmers want tosee an immediate moratorium on the release of other geneticallyengineered commodity crops, and a commitment from the University tofund research into local, sustainable agriculture."

Joseph Gerson, Foreign Policy In Focus, March 20, 2008www. fpif. orgVictories are within sight for people in a growing number of nations where communities that host U.S. foreign military bases have long fought to get rid of them.Ecuador’s decision not to renew the U.S. lease for the forward operating base at Manta (see Yankees Head Home) is the culmination of just one of many long-term and recently initiated community-based and national struggles to remove these military installations that are often sources of crime and demeaning human rights violations. A growing alliance among anti-bases movements in countries around the world, including the United States, is preventing the creation of new foreign military bases, restricting the expansion of others, and in some cases may win the withdrawal of the military bases, installations and troops that are essential to U.S. wars of intervention and its preparations for first-strike nuclear attacks.The ChallengeOf course, there is still plenty of bad news. The Bush Administration is currently negotiating what is, in essence, a security treaty with the Maliki puppet government in Baghdad to secure one of the principle Bush-Cheney war aims: permanent military bases for tens of thousands of U.S. troops. The goal is to transform Iraq into an U.S. unsinkable aircraft carrier in the heart of the oil-rich Middle East. Unfortunately, the plan for Iraq is only one part of the vast and expanding U.S. infrastructure of nearly 1,000 military bases and installations strategically scattered around the world.Across Asia, in Japan, another Marine has raped an Okinawan school girl, traumatizing yet another life and temporarily shaking the foundations of the U.S.-Japan military alliance. Under the guise of a “Visiting Force Agreement,” U.S. troops have returned to the Philippines where they are deployed from “temporary” and unconstitutional military bases. In the Indian Ocean, Chagossian people were removed from Diego Garcia to make way for massive U.S. military bases; they have won all of their legal appeals but still can’t return home. In Central Europe, the Bush Administration is pressing deployment of first strike-related “missile defense” bases in the Czech Republic and Poland. Russia has countered by threatening to target the bases with nuclear weapons, and opposition to “missile defense.” In response to this renewed Cold War, opposition to “missile defense” weaponry is building in public squares and in parliaments throughout the region. And, as he recently traveled across Africa, President George W. Bush was met with near universal opposition to his plans for further military colonization of the continent in the form of moving the Pentagon’s Africa Command headquarters from Europe to the oil and resource-rich continent.The Bush Administration and Pentagon are “reconfiguring” the U.S. global network of more than 750 foreign military bases to impose what Vice President Dick Cheney termed in a New Yorker interview as “the arrangement for the 21st century.” This imperial “arrangement” is increasingly being met with opposition in “host” nations and the United States alike, and victories by allied movements are within reach.How We Got HereFor more than a century, the United States has been building an unrivaled global structure of nearly foreign fortresses. Located on every continent and at sea, these military bases and installations provide an infrastructure from which invasions and nuclear wars can be launched. They enforce an unjust and often violent status quo, influence the politics and diplomacy of “host” nations, secure privileged access to oil and other natural resources, encircle enemies, “show the flag,” and more recently have served as prisons operating outside the restrictions of U.S. and international law.These bases violate democratic values in other ways. When the United States was founded, the Declaration of Independence decried the “abuses and usurpations” caused by King George having “kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies.” Since then, “abuses and usurpations” inherent in the presence of foreign “Standing Armies” have become far more dangerous. Their demeaning and disruptive impacts include:* Undermining the sovereignty of “host” nations* Militarizing and colonizing the “host” nation’s culture* Assaulting democracy and human rights* Seizing people’s private property and damaging their homes* Violently abusing and dehumanizing women and girls* Causing life-endangering military accidents and crimes that are rarely punished* Terrorizing low-altitude training flights and night-landing exercises* Polluting with military toxicsSince the Cold War ended, U.S. presidents and the Pentagon have worked to “reconfigure” the architecture of this military infrastructure to address changing geopolitical realities, technological “advances,” and growing resistance to the presence of foreign bases. With agility, flexibility and speed being given priority in U.S. military operations, bases are being transformed into hubs, forward operating bases, and “lily pads” for invasions and foreign military interventions.The other axis of reconfiguration is geographic. As U.S. forces have been forced out of Saudi Arabia, and with U.S. geostrategic priorities turning away from Europe and toward China, Washington has concentrated its military build up elsewhere in the Persian Gulf nations, Asia and the Pacific.Tipping PointsIn a number of countries, the reconfiguration has not proceeded as smoothly as anticipated:IraqAs Major General Robert Pollman explained in 2004, “It ma[de] a lot of sense” to “swap” U.S. bases in Saudi Arabia for new ones in Iraq. U.S. command and air bases located near the holy cities of Mecca and Medina incensed many Muslims and were among Osama Bin Laden’s professed reasons for the 9-11 attacks. In the lead up to the 2003 invasion, many of the functions of these bases were moved to Qatar and Kuwait, and after the conquest, 110 bases were established across Iraq. To limit their political and military vulnerability, the Pentagon has been spending more than a $1 billion a year to consolidate them into 14 “enduring” and massive Air Force, Army and Marine bases in Baghdad and other strategic locations, In addition to helping secure U.S. control over Iraq, these bases contribute to encircling Iran, and they can be used for attacks across the Persian Gulf region and into oil-rich Central Asia.The Bush administration’s plans to saddle its successor with these bases and the continuing occupation by negotiating an agreement with the Maliki government hit unexpected road block. In addition to popular Iraqi opposition, U.S. peace movement organizations joined Rep. Bill Delahunt (D-MA) to prevent the unconstitutional imposition of what is essentially a treaty. The Delahunt hearings about the proposed commitment to defend the Baghdad government from internal and external enemies, the bases which are permanent in all but name, and privileged access to investment opportunities (read oil) for U.S. corporations forced Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to rhetorically back away from the open-ended security commitment to Baghdad. But his promises that the bases are “not permanent” are less credible.Nothing is officially “permanent,” of course. Not even the bases in Japan and Korea, which have been there for more than six decades, and not the Great Wall of China, or the pyramids of Egypt, which are slowly decaying.With opposition to the treaty and the permanent military bases now a defining issue between Democrats and Republicans, the U.S. peace movement has an important opening to press its demands for the immediate and total withdrawal from Iraq.AFRICOMU.S. planners anticipate that by 2015 Africa will provide the U.S. with 25% of its imported oil. With Islamist political forces operating across northern Africa, the continent is also seen as an important front in the misconceived “war on terrorism.” So, to “promote peace and stability on the continent” the Bush Administration and the Pentagon want to augment the U.S. military presence in Africa, beginning with the transfer of the Africa Command, AFRICOM, from remote Germany to an accommodating African nation. As President Bush learned during his recent ill-fated African tour, the continent’s leaders are understandably reluctant to accept renewed military colonization. Ghana’s President John Kufuour put it bluntly when he met with Bush, saying, “You’re not going to build any bases in Ghana.”Africa is not free of bases. France and Britain still have bases scattered there. The U.S. has bases in Djibouti and Algeria, access agreements with Morocco and Egypt, and is in the process of creating a “family” of military bases in sub-Saharan Africa (Cameroon, Guinea, Mali, Sao Tome, Senegal and Uganda.) And, although Bush responded to African fears about AFRICOM’s possible relocation by saying that such rumors were “baloney” and “bull,” he also conceded that: “We haven’t made our minds up.”With a growing No AFRICOM movement in the United States that’s that is allied with anti-colonialist forces in Africa, this is one U.S. threat that can be contained.Diego GarciaIn the mid-1960s, in a quintessential act of European colonialism, all of Diego Garcia’s 2,000 inhabitants were forcefully removed from their homeland by British authorities to make way for massive U.S. air and naval bases. In an act of legal fiction, the island was separated from Mauritius on the eve of that island nation’s independence.Located in the Indian Ocean, Diego Garcia’s two-mile long runways have since been used to launch B-1 and B-52 attacks against Iraq and Afghanistan. Its stealth bomber hangars have recently been upgraded for possible strikes against Iran, and its submarine base is being refitted to serve Ohio-class submarines that can be used for both missile attacks and to secretly deploy Navy SEALS in Iran and other Persian Gulf nations.The Chagos people of Diego Garcia want to return home, ending their exile in Mauritius’ slums, where up to 90% are unemployed and live desperate lives. The base rests on colonial constructions. With the help of allies in London and around the world they attempted to return, but have been halted on the high seas. But their plight and struggle has wide and sympathetic media attention, especially as they have won one challenge after another in the British courts. The British House of Lords is to make a “final ruling,” but an end run in which Diego Garcia would be returned to Mauritius’ authority and the “rented” to Washington remains possible. Education about the plight and struggle of the people of Diego Garcia, beginning with the spring speaking tour of Chagos leader Olivier Bancoult, is the best way to prepare for the next round of this compelling struggle.OkinawaSince its 1945 bloody conquest in 1945, Okinawa has served as the principle bastion of U.S. military power in East Asia – even after its 1972 reversion to Japan. Sixty years after the end of World War II, nearly 45,000 U.S. troops, civilian staff, and their families are based on Air Force, Navy, Marine and Army bases that occupy 27% of the island prefecture. Okinawans have suffered nearly every imaginable military abuse: One quarter of its people were killed during the 1945 battle, many by Japanese soldiers. U.S. nuclear weapons have fallen off ships and into coastal fishing grounds. Shells and bullets from live fire exercises have slammed into people’s homes. Children, their grandmothers, base and service workers have suffered rapes that are too numerous to count. Land has been seized, and military accidents – including helicopters and their parts falling into students’ schools – are not uncommon.To pacify the nationwide outrage that followed the 1995 kidnapping and rape of a 12-year-old Okinawan school girl in 1995, Washington and Tokyo agreed to reduce, not remove, the size of the U.S. footprint on Okinawa. With the U.S.-Japan alliance hanging in the balance, the Status of Forces Agreement was revised to accord the Japanese courts greater authority over crimes by G.I.s, and a plan was developed to move half of the 16,000 Marines – the greatest source of G.I. crime – to Guam largely at Japan’s expense. Several bases were consolidated and Washington agreed to move the Futemna Air Base, in Ginowan’s city center, to a more remote part of the island. This leaves the massive Air Force, Naval and Marine bases still occupying a quarter of the prefecture.Inspired by respected elders, the people of Henoko, the coastal site to which Futnema’s functions were to be transferred, have put up a stiff resistance. To prevent the militarization of their community and the destruction of the reef on which the new air base is to be built, they have built alliances with peace activists and environmentalists around the world. Their focus has been to prevent destruction feeding grounds for dugongs (large, gentle sea mammals similar to manatees) that became the symbol of their movement. They have also conducted months-long sit-ins and taken their case to court. A California appeal court recently confirmed their environmental claims, and the relocation process stalled.Within weeks of this court victory, Marines raped a 14-year-old Okinawan school girl and a Filipina woman sparking renewed outrage across Okinawa and Japan. In the “Message from the Women of Okinawa” that followed, the U.S. military and the world were notified that the days when “so many rape victims…told no one and wept silently in their beds…are now over.” Their message is clear, “Go back to America. Now.”With Washington and Tokyo focused on “containing” China, it will be years before the last G.I. returns from Okinawa. In the meantime, we can provide critical support to women and men who are courageously and nonviolently campaigning to defend their lives, their families, their communities, and nature itself. The base at Henoko must not be built. The base in Futenma must be closed. It is past time to bring all the Marines home.GuamGuam is not home. Located in the South Pacific and conquered by the United States from Spain in 1898, it has long served as a U.S. stepping stone to Asia. Nominally it is not a U.S. colony, but an “unincorporated territory” with a nonvoting delegate in Congress. Throughout the Cold War, U.S. air and naval bases occupied the island’s best agricultural lands, water sources and fishing grounds. Now the abuses and usurpations are becoming much worse.Since the nonviolent 1995 Okinawan uprising, the Pentagon has been preparing for the day when it is finally forced to withdraw from Okinawa and Japan. Thus Guam is being transformed in to a military “hub.” Already large enough to accommodate B-52 and stealth bombers, Andersen Air Force Base is being expanded to serve as “the most significant U.S. Air Force base in the Pacific region for this century.” More submarines are being homeported in its harbor, and the Navy is considering homeporting an aircraft carrier strike force there is well. Then, there are those Marines from Okinawa. Understandably, Guam’s tiny Chamorro population feels besieged. In the traditions of U.S., Israeli and South African settler colonialism, it is “cowboys and Indians all over again.” We have a responsibility to prevent this cultural genocide.EuropeThe Cold War never really ended in Europe. An estimated 380 U.S. nuclear weapons are still based in seven European nations, and most of the 100,000 troops deployed across Western Europe remain there. But Pentagon campaigns to deploy misnamed “missile defenses” in the Czech Republic and Poland and to expand the Aviano Air Base in Italy are leading hundreds of thousands of Europeans into the streets.The missile defense system is ostensibly modest. A missile tracking radar is to be installed in the Czech Republic, and ten interceptor missiles are to be sited in Poland, reportedly to defend Europe from Iranian missiles that have not been deployed. In fact, this is the tip of the iceberg. Russia properly fears that, once deployed, the missile defense system will be greatly expanded with the goal of neutralizing Moscow’s missile forces, leaving Russia vulnerable to U.S. first strike attacks. In response, President Vladimir Putin has menacingly threatened to target nuclear weapons against the Czechs and Poles.Opinion polls indicate that most Czechs oppose the missile defense deployments and want to hold a referendum to block them. Many NATO leaders are angry that the U.S. circumvented the European Union’s decision-making process, and protests spearheaded by the U.S. Campaign for Peace and Democracy greeted Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek when he recently visited the United States. With many leading congressional Democrats also opposed to these dangerous deployments, missile defenses can be stopped.Finally, there is Italy where, unexpectedly, hundreds of thousands of citizens turned out to protest the expansion of the U.S. Air Base at Aviano (which also hosts U.S. nuclear weapons.) Dissent over the base expansion nearly toppled the Prodi government in 2007, and it will remain the focus of European and U.S. anti-bases campaigns.ResistanceIn response to popularly based movements to win the withdrawal of unwanted U.S. foreign military bases, an incipient U.S. anti-bases movement is emerging. It includes organizations as diverse as the American Friends Service Committee, and the Southwest Workers Union, the United for Peace and Justice coalition, and scholars who are moving from studying military bases to working for their withdrawal.Four increasingly integrated U.S. anti-bases networks have developed in recent years, spurred in part by the development of the global “No Military Bases Network” in World Social Forums and the global Network’s formal inauguration in Quito, Ecuador at a conference last year that brought together four hundred activists from forty nations. The U.S. networks are currently organizing April speaking tours featuring Olivier Bancoult from Diego Garcia, Terri Keko’olani from Hawaii, Jan Tamas and the Czech Republic, and Andreas Licata from Italy. And a national U.S. “No Foreign Military Bases” conference is in its early planning stages.Joseph Gerson, a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus (www. fpif. org), is director of programs of the American Friends Service Committee in New England. His books include The Sun Never Sets…Confronting the Network of U.S. Foreign Military Bases, (South End Press, 1991) and Empire and the Bomb: How the U.S. Uses Nuclear Weapons to Dominate the World (Pluto Press, 2007).

When you go back on your Word & Break Treaties in World Court, Imprison a Queen on Trumped up Charges,Auction the Palaces contents & Riches over a ten year span. and then to have the Gaul to Lable the "ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED and in SLAVED " as " BARBARIANS " and CONTINUE TO ILLEGALLY OCCUPY & FORCIBLE RULE, WITH A TRUMPED UP RACIST PUPPET GOVERNMENT, THAT CONTINUES TO PRACTICE ITS SICKENING RACIST GENOCIDAL COLONIAL PROGRAM ON OTHER NATIONS & COUNTRIES THROUGH OUT OUR WORLD ???MAKES YOU PROUD TO BE AMERICAN IN GOOD OLE USA , THE OTHER ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED ONCE GREAT NATION , "AMERIKA" !
Princess Ka'iulani film outrages some Hawaiianshttp://www. honoluluadvertiser. com/A movie about Princess Ka'iulani currently filming on O'ahu has angered a small group of Hawaiians who say filmmakers are distorting the story of a beloved ali'i.High on their list of complaints was the movie's proposed title — "Barbarian Princess" — which was changed last weekend in an effort to ease tensions. The $9 million film now is titled "The Last Princess."But Hawai'i entertainer Palani Vaughan, who has complained about the film's script since he read it in February, said he is not convinced that English director Marc Forby will accurately portray the life and times of Ka'iulani."A non-Hawaiian is trying to interpret in an un-Hawaiian way what he is supposing has happened," Vaughan said. "Forby is coming and coloring it in a way that he would like to see it."Vaughan has organized several Hawaiians who plan to voice their concerns tomorrow outside 'Iolani Palace, where the film will be shot next week. The group is also concerned that filming inside the palace could damage irreplaceable artifacts.Ka'iulani, who died at age 23, witnessed the overthrow of the monarchy in 1893 and tried to restore Hawaiian self-rule. The filmmakers say the movie about her short life "is a breathtaking romance about an unlikely heroine and her unwavering fight to defend the independence of her people."Former Hawai'i resident Q'orianka Kilcher was cast as Ka'iulani. Kilcher portrayed Pocahontas in the 2005 film "The New World."The film is being made by Matador Pictures and Island Film Group.Vaughan, who turned down the part of King Kalakaua, said filmmakers sprinkled the script with behavior unbefitting a princess and those around her, including one scene in which she tells the king she hates him and another in which her father, a non-Hawaiian, strikes her.Vaughan strongly objected to a lovemaking scene and was told it would be removed."I have no personal agenda," Vaughan said. "We just want this film to represent Hawaiian people both past and present in a true and accurate light. It is for the good of our people and the future."Hawaiian activist Henry Noa said he is worried about the interior of the palace."They will have all these people coming in and out of the palace that we revere," he said. "That is a part of who we are. It is the pride and care we are concerned about. If it is damaged, who will be held accountable for that?"Leilani Forby, an executive producer and the wife of the director, said everyone involved with the film has worked with cultural advisers, University of Hawai'i scholars and Hawaiian language experts for the past four years to foster accuracy."We have the utmost respect for Hawaiians," said Forby, who grew up in Kailua. "That is what is driving the story. We want the world to know what happened."But the movie is a drama, she said."This is not and never has been intended to be a documentary," Forby said. "I wouldn't say things have been twisted. We have had to take several historical events and compress time just to get the important events on film."Forby said the film does not contain a love scene or any sexual reference."There is a love interest and there are tender scenes of this love blooming, but this is not going to be an R-rated film," she said.Protecting the palace is a top priority, Forby said. Everyone involved will wear soft booties to preserve the floor varnish as well as gloves. Replica furniture is also being made for interior use."We are going to have an inside crew and an outside crew and never the twain shall meet," Forby said. "Once you are in, you are in and if you go out, you are out."The filmmakers have worked with palace caretakers to ensure that lighting does not overheat the interior and have hired an equipment manager from England who is familiar with filming inside national treasures, she said.Kippen de Alba Chu, executive director at the palace, said it would be protected. Palace staff will always be on hand to escort the film crew, inside and outside."They will not harm anything," he said. "We will make sure of that."Reach Mike Gordon at mgordon@honoluluadvertiser.com.Nini'ane

Nini'ane


Aloha Pono!
![[Ho'okupu: Kalo leaves used in an offering at a heiau on Oahu]](http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2699/images/b.limahana.detroye.oahu.bryna.storch.jpg)
What an outpouring of support for Haloa we have experienced! This morning testimony from over 6,000 people was submitted to Hawaii's House of Representatives in support of protecting taro from genetic modification and patenting by research institutes and bio-tech firms. Testimony came from all across the islands: kupuna & keiki, farmers & scientists, cultural practitioners & environmentalists, non-profit organizations, local governments, poi-lovers ... everyone! Mahalo for your inspiring expressions of love for Hawaii's most sacred plant & ancestor, Haloa, the taro plant.
Thanks to YOUR powerful expressions of this support SB958 - calling for a 10 Year Moratorium on Genetic Modification of Taro - was finally granted this committee hearing. It is the final hearing this bill needs on its way to becoming a law. Thanks to your dedication, we now have a real chance to plant a permanent change. Now is our chance to express our support from protecting Hawaii's 'aina and ancestors. Now is our chance to look our legislators in the eye, to hold our politicians accountable for their decisions. Now is our chance to bear witness and ensure Haloa is protected. Now is our chance...
10 Year Moratorium on Genetic Modification of Kalo/Taro
Tomorrow - Wednesday

To learn more about SB 958, visit our website by clicking here.
If you are submitting late testimony, please bring 15 copies.
Be sure to sign up at the Registration Table to speak at the hearing.
Bring a sweater - the auditorium is cold.
Bring chairs to sit comfortably in the lobby.
Bring the kids so they can learn about this law-making process.
Need ideas for parking? Call us (toll-free) 1-888-528-6288.
The hearing will be broadcast live on Olelo cable channel 53!
Compañero PinkoFYI. The "snakes" or "serpents" that "St." Patrick chased out of Ireland were the pagans that refused to convert to Christianity and were thus slaughtered or exiled. He accomplished what other empires, IE the Romans could not. For the Irish to celebrate "St." Patrick's day is the equivalent of Indigenous, Native Americas to celebrate Columbus day.SAY NO TO G.M.O.

<</body>

