All Posts (6512)

Sort by

Hula, since MM is around!!

so I went to MM for the first time last nite, went to see the MAH competition and some thoughts came into my mind about hula....bare with me since some of these are thoughts and some of these are just funny quotes i came up with while watching....first since it was the first competition i seen, lets talk about Miss Aloha Hula....-first - interestingly enuff, I kinda realized that you watch and observe and take in more "Hula" on this night, then when you're at Kahiko or Auana nites....i know theres more dancers and more halau performing on those other nights....but because of the increased number of dancers on stage, you watch other things...you watch cooridination, synchornization (sp hehe), you watch how the dancers interact with each other as has been planned, you watch the effects of these plans and how well everyone looks together....those are all cool and all, but really, if you want to see "Hula", you watch a single dancer dance...you see more of the dancer's emotion, their certainties and uncertainties, you can sense her relationship with the song...her relationship with the ho'opa'a...the relationship with her and her moves...you sense more "Hula" then you do on the other nights...i guess its like....(sorry for the odd comparison) if Jet Li was to fight Jackie Chan...you can find out more about the person if they're one-on-one...if its just Jet Li vs Jackie Chan - but if Jackie had a whole gang fighting with him against Jet Li, it's hard to sense how they fight and what they're really doing, its a group effort and some things are seen, but a lot of aspects are lost or hidden on purpose within the group.-second - I applaud all the dancers, as it's a hell of a task, to step up there, infront of your peers (hula sisters/other hula dancers), friends and family, strangers, and a group of experts (the judges) and dance. I can't imagine how that is.-third - [i know youre thinking - ho sheeze hows this guy, talking so much about hula, who the hell he think he is? haha im surprised if anyone actually reads this far, but eh, I'm bored at work, I live in Hilo, I dont have that much frens out here to talk to, so im gonna keep on writing! haha] to me, as I've roamed around in this activity very briefly, but do a lot of things closely related to Hula in a Hawaiian perspective, i'd have to break it down like this....there is different aspects to Hula - physical stuff (i'o) - stuff we can see....the movements, the smiles, the sounds/chants (k i know this isnt' physical but im gonna throw it in there for now...). then theres the emotional - thoughts and feelings in the dancers mind/body and then theres the spiritual - which is kinda hard for me to explain, but im hoping ull sense it when im finished writing this.... so my thing is this....Hula at a competition when there is judges judging you, they can see and here that first category, they judge the movements and the dance, and they judge the sounds and how well the two go together...they, being highly respected experts, can probably sense the emotional feelings going on within the dancers...but if im not mistakened, the spiritual is not for the judges to judge...its something between the dancer and herself...the dancer and her aumakua/akua that she has relations with, and its between her and the song...i ku'u wahi mana'o, it can only be sensed and judged by the dancer herself, her aumakua/akua that she has relations with, and the song. To me, this is the most important part of the dance...without this spiritual aspect, the hula is just another broadway production, Hawaiian style. Hula without the spiritual, is not hula. It is a dance, yet not hula. if you want to tell the story with your hands, do so, but without the spiritual, its story time at the library and nothing more. and Im not complaining about the MAH competition, I'm actually applauding those that do have that spiritual aspect of their dance present...and I'm also saying, no matter what the judges say, the one thing that has to be judged, was judged, by you the hula dancer, your aumakua/akua that you have a relationship with, and the mele itself. and while it didn't count to any rewards or prizes or points in the competition, if you did good with the spiritual side of it, you made yourself, the gods and the mele happy!!! good job!!!k lawa for now...
Read more…

FORMER OHA TRUSTEE SUPPORTS AUDIT

Here's What Former Trustee Clarence Ku Ching Says -"...I stressed that the statutory requirement mandating an audit every 4 years was grossly insufficient - as lots of mischief can take place at much shorter time intervals - as it seems to appear at present - and that it is possible that irreparable damage may result.I was extremely disappointed that OHA's trustees opposed the resolution - wondering what they had to hide.I also stressed that the trustees have "fiduciary responsibilities and obligations" to their beneficiaries and that whenever (between mandated audits) a number of beneficiaries (as is happening now) request an audit - that it happens. I requested an audit as a beneficiary.I also suggested that OHA's recent use of LLCs (limited liability corporations) that seemed to convert "trust" assets into "private" assets - out of sight and oversight of its beneficiaries, the public and the legislature - and seemingly beyond any "trustee" responsibilities and obligations and placed in the hands of "private" individuals might be a serious mischief....there are some who are trying to obtain the originating documents for the LLCs and taking a magnifying glass to what is happening - with the possibility that OHA's trustees have breached their responsibilities and obligations. There may be sufficient grounds for a very successful litigation to restore these "trust" assets to the "trust," for the benefit of OHA's rightful beneficiaries."
Read more…

Native Hawaiian Recruitment

I would like to take the time to let you know about our efforts to recruit more Native Hawaiians into law school, in particular the William S. Richardson School of Law. In this e-mail we will briefly describe our program, explain why we seek to recruit Native Hawaiians into law school, share with you some of the successes of Native Hawaiians at the William S. Richardson School of Law, and encourage you to either apply to our program or forward this e-mail to Hawaiians you know are interested in pursuing a law degree providing you with our website address and important upcoming dates.OUR PROGRAMIn 2006, we began offering Law School Admission Test (LSAT) preparation classes to Native Hawaiians. The LSAT is a necessary component in the law school admissions process and an area in the admissions process where Native Hawaiians seem to have difficulty. Our LSAT Preparation program for Native Hawaiians is recognized as impacting the number of Native Hawaiians admitted into the Richardson School of Law for the 2007-08 admissions period. Program participants consistently say they recommend our program to other Native Hawaiians.THE NEED FOR MORE NATIVE HAWAIIAN ATTORNEYSBy increasing the number of Native Hawaiian law students and attorneys, we can eventually expect an increase in the number of Native Hawaiian prosecutors, public defenders, judges, law clerks, private practice attorneys, corporate law attorneys, law and policy makers, state agency & department heads, business leaders, etc. in Hawai'i. Increasing the number of legally educated Native Hawaiians in Hawai'i provides more opportunities for positive social change affecting the Native Hawaiian community and the larger Hawai'i community.NATIVE HAWAIIAN LAW STUDENT SUCCESSESNative Hawaiian law students have been making significant strides at the William S. Richardson School of Law. This 2007-08 academic year, one of two of the Chief Editors of the school's Law Review (a prestigious academic law journal) is a Native Hawaiian. One of next year's Chief Editors is a Native Hawaiian also. Three Native Hawaiians won national awards in two out of three categories at this year's Native American Moot Court Competition (First Place in the Best Brief Category and Second and Third Place in the Best Advocates (overall) category). A Native Hawaiian placed Third in the regional Jessup International law competition. Native Hawaiian law students are contributing to the forthcoming second issue of the Native Hawaiian Rights Handbook and also serve as research assistants to the Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law. While in school, a number of Hawaiian law students have assisted the Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation with several legal issues. Another Native Hawaiian who will graduate this May was recently hired by the firm of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati (a firm that represents Google and Apple among other high profile clients). Lastly, Native Hawaiian students, since last year, have started graduating with specialized certificates in Native Hawaiian Law.REACHING NATIVE HAWAIIANSWith all this in mind, we hope that you will help us recruit Native Hawaiians by forwarding this e-mail to other Native Hawaiians interested in and eligible to pursue a law school education. More information about our program is available at our website, www2.hawaii.edu/~ahahui. At our website, interested Native Hawaiians may download the application for our program. Applications are due by April 18, 2008. We seek to prepare students for the October 4, 2008 LSAT in anticipation for entry into the 2009 academic school year. Thank you for your help.
Read more…

1300!

Aloha kakou e ke Ao Maoli, Whoo! Maoliworld has reached 1300 members! It's amazing. It's wonderful to see everyone here... aloha! Ikaika
Read more…

Mele Manaka: Ka Lā Mua

I have really been looking forward to this year's MM. Last year at the MM craft fair, a girlfriend of mine, who is also does my coiff, bought the Fornander Collection. I vividly recall her showing me the set, and how happy she was at such a precious score. Yes, it was really spendy, but like our Pākē foremothers used to say, "suffer the price for the best you can buy and you only cry once." At the time, I had made a mental note to myself that I would wait for Native Books to come back, and I would evaluate then if I wanted to drop the cash on those books.As this MM approached, I had developed a quiet resolution that yes, I really wanted my own FC. I have collected books over the years and try only to buy what would I consider valuable content (I don't get worked up over particular editions or quality; if I can turn the pages and read each one, I'll go after the bussup copy on ebay any day over one in pristine condition). I have never considered owning Fornander, because let's face it, that set was soooo out of reach. This year though, I would make it a financial priority; a gift to my household and to my impending 40th birthday.Its the beginning of the month and the bills are paid. Funds have been squirreled away and I am ready. This morning I said, "today is the day! Native Books is going to be at the Civic!" I walk down the isle and see ʻEhukai. ʻAelike ko māua maka. I ask him if they had brought a set of Fornander with them this year. His face slightly fell as he said, "we sold our our very last set last year here at this craft fair…out of print…quoth the palala nevermore…"Several things run though my mind…blood throbs between my ears…ebay and alibris and gouging and oh no…gaaayah…plan b…gotta get back to work…try to do the Ghandi trip and chill, but freafrickafreraarefarfugneugenfindmemyfornandersconfonnit…Ok. Nuff kicking the dirt. It isn't meant to be right now. Get up, Trinity!…then the day goes on. Hale Bihopa is new this year at the Civic; they bring this hu-mangous display in front of the food booth. As the day goes on, the mnemonic programming from repetitive gazing gets at me. After the lunch rush, I take the time to really check it out. What. A. Score! It is the Haʻilono 2008 display, with a free booklet replica of the display, as well as a quality reprint of a particular edition of Ka Nupepa Kuokoa 1862. Ke Akua is so good…no lede, you aren't getting a priceless bookset. You get to save your money and take these copies of equally priceless ʻike. As the rest of Hilo is sitting in the Stadium enjoying Johnny Arum Ho (as his gazillions of Japanese dancers respectfully call him), I am going to chill out the rest of the evening pouring over the booklet and nupepa, just a little stoked at how this day has turned out.Nani ka haʻawina.Later on I can plan on how to get my hairdressah to gimme back my Fornander set that she bought with all the money I gave to her…
Read more…

HELP SAVE THE OHA AUDIT BILL!

Hawai`i Legislature Planning To Kill The BillAccording to reliable sources, the House is planning on killing the OHA audit bill, SCR138 SD1. It's imperative to submit testimony in support of this bill now!Legislators to focus on are House Speaker Calvin Say, Representative Ken Ito, and Representative Jon Riki Karamatsu.Here's Their Email Addresses -repito@Capitol.hawaii.govtestimony@capitol.hawaii.govsenbaker@Capitol.hawaii.govsentsutsui@Capitol.hawaii.govrepkaramatsu@Capitol.hawaii.govrepsay@Capitol.hawaii.govYour testimony sent now will send a clear message that a hearing needs to be scheduled.Please Do It Today!Say "YES!" To An Audit Of The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs!
Read more…

Kalo at the Heart of Hearing

Most residents back county resolutions for cultural reasonsby Nathan Eagle - THE GARDEN ISLANDMore than a dozen residents opposed to genetically modified taro hoisted the culturally important plant and flaunted “protect your roots” shirts behind farmers who testified before the Kaua‘i County Council, yesterday, at the Historic County Building.The council has proposed resolutions supporting three bills pending at the state Legislature that would impose a 10-year moratorium on developing or growing genetically engineered taro, create a taro security and purity task force and fund statewide research on the apple snail, an invasive pest threatening the crop.Supporters, representing the vast majority of speakers who addressed the council during the hours-long hearing, said messing with the genetic make-up of taro disrespects Native Hawaiians who consider the edible plant sacred. They also argued that a lack of information on the effects of genetically altered food, specifically taro, presents real risks to consumers.Opponents claim genetic engineering research could produce disease-resistant taro, securing its future. They also said there is little chance of cross-contamination between varieties because of the nature of the species.The council did not take action by press time. Testimony for the hearing, which started at 2:15 p.m., was still flowing hours later.“Don’t fool around with the taro,” said John A‘ana, a Westside farmer for the past 30 years, who held up a taro plant as he addressed council. “The bottom line is you need to show respect for the Hawaiian culture.”Wendell Rich, the site manager for Monsanto in Hanapepe, opposed the council resolutions but said that the multi-national biotechnology company and leading producer of genetically engineered seeds and herbicides has no plans to do anything with taro.“The disease argument to me is a fear factor,” Anahola resident Hale Mawae said. “GMO represents control and manipulation of our food crops. Do we give that to these corporate companies?”A Maui County Council committee and the Big Island County Council have passed similar resolutions supporting the state’s effort to temporarily ban work related to genetically modified taro.Roy Oyama, representing the Kauai Farm Bureau, voiced opposition to a moratorium on testing genetically engineered taro.“I don’t care what you tell me, research is needed,” he said, noting concerns over viral threats.He acknowledged that the bureau did not poll its 360-plus members, saying the decision was based on a policy statement adopted at the group’s annual state convention.“Many of them don’t know what’s going on,” he said, referring to local members. “Agriculture is burning in my heart. I want to see it progress and feed every one of you.”Senate Bill 958, which would impose the 10-year moratorium, was deferred after a seven-hour hearing March 19 before the House Agriculture Committee. An overwhelming majority of testimony delivered at the Capitol reportedly supported the resolution.The House referred Senate Bill 2518, which would provide $500,000 in grant funding for taro research, to the Ways and Means Committee.The House Finance Committee held a hearing yesterday at the Capitol on Senate Bill 2915, which would create the taro task force.Taro and taro markets are in a state of decline, according to the state legislation. The threats that taro farming families and communities face in cultivating taro are numerous and growing.Taro lands in Hawai‘i represent less than 1 percent of all agricultural lands in cultivation in the state, yet it remains the most important traditional cultural crop in Hawai‘i, the state legislation says.“The way the issue has been handled is ripping the community apart,” Kapa‘a resident Adam Asquith said, supporting council’s proposed resolutions.County Council members Shaylene Iseri-Carvalho and Mel Rapozo authored the resolutions.“This bill does not prohibit continued dialogue,” Iseri-Carvalho said. “Why not be safe before we proceed?”See a future edition of The Garden Island for follow-up on yesterday’s meeting.• Nathan Eagle, staff writer, can be reached at 245-3681 (ext. 224) or neagle@kauaipubco.com.
Read more…

Kauai County Council Votes No GMO Kalo!

Resolution supports 10-year moratoriumby Nathan Eagle - THE GARDEN ISLANDA deeply rooted community debate over the future of a culturally important crop on Kaua‘i climaxed late Thursday night at the Historic County Building.After hearing hours of heartfelt pleas and hopeful comments from farmers and scientists, keiki and kupuna, the County Council passed a resolution supporting a bill pending in the state Legislature that would place a 10-year moratorium on growing or developing genetically modified taro.Councilmembers Mel Rapozo, Shaylene Iseri-Carvalho, Tim Bynum and Jay Furfaro cast votes in favor of the resolution; JoAnn Yukimura, Ron Kouchi and Bill “Kaipo” Asing against it. The split 4-3 vote reflected a torn community.Supporters want taro, or kalo in Hawaiian, to remain pure. Generations of Native Hawaiians consider it disrespectful to even consider messing with the genetic make-up of the sacred plant.Legend has it Kalo sprouted from Haloa, the stillborn child of Wakea, the sky father, and Ho‘ohokukalani, the star mother, to become the first taro plant thousands of years ago.Kalo provides the kanaka maoli’s life-giving sustenance, poi, and is seen as the older brother of mankind, according to Senate Bill 958, which would impose the temporary ban on genetically modified taro.Bynum, a first-term councilman, said he was pulled in by the cultural arguments.“I’m a transplant here. I was embraced with aloha by a whole lot of people who live here,” he said yesterday. “They’re saying it’s sacred and are asking to honor the culture. That’s what wooed me. It was my toughest decision yet.”While the vast majority of oral testimony pushed for the resolution’s passage, some residents argued that genetic engineering research could uncover ways to produce a disease-resistant plant — securing its future.“All the taro farmers understand and are sensitive to the cultural significance of taro to the Hawaiian community and also have reservations about GMO taro,” Kaua‘i Taro Growers Association President Rodney Haraguchi said in his written testimony. “However, they are opposed to have a law passed for 10 years restricting research which may be necessary.”Kaua‘i farmers produce roughly 75 percent of the state’s taro, Bynum said.The crop comprises less than 1 percent of all agricultural lands in cultivation in Hawai‘i, according to state legislation.The public hearing spanned some nine hours with the final roll call vote around 11:30 p.m., Bynum said. The council had to wade through this testimony in addition to input from another public hearing two weeks ago and a steady stream of written remarks.Yukimura released a written statement yesterday explaining why she voted against the resolution.“I do not believe it is pono to pass a law instituting a 10-year moratorium without taking the time to understand the objections, reservations and concerns of those who produce the majority of the taro in the state — most of whom are Kaua‘i farmers, our neighbors and friends who for generations have been keeping poi on all of our tables,” she says. “This doesn’t mean that I don’t believe a moratorium might or should be eventually instituted, but I think that decision should be made by the stakeholders, not county councils or legislators — at least not until after those with a stake in taro have gone through a process and come to a consensus or an agreement to disagree.”Council deferred the resolution at its March 12 meeting after hearing from residents who rallied with signs and taro-related shirts. The numbers were almost double on Thursday when an estimated 30 community members, some carrying taro plants as proof of a healthy GMO-free crop, filled council chambers.The resolution’s passage makes a policy statement, Bynum said, noting that its weight remains uncertain.There is no genetically modified taro in production in the state and the University of Hawai‘i recently abandoned attempts to patent some strains of the plant.There are some 70 taro varieties in existence today, Senate Bill 958 states, down from an estimated 300 or more at the time European explorers arrived.“For me, the question is how do we solve the problems of taro security and purity, including the debate over the 10-year moratorium, without breaking the ‘ohana apart?” Yukimura says. “I passionately believe that there is a way to do that. That way is often harder because it takes deep listening, suspending our judgments and positions and really seeking to understand before seeking to be understood. But, in fact, the solutions to our problems, whatever the solutions may be, depend on the ‘ohana staying together and working together.”When ‘ohana is broken into root words, “oha” is the smaller taro corms growing from the older part of the plant that is used to feed one’s family and “ana” is a conjunctive word connoting regeneration or procreation, according to state legislation.“In voting against the council resolution supporting SB 958, I know that there will be people who say that I am for GMOs. Or, that I don’t have respect for the native Hawaiian culture, which will hurt me, but I accept that condemnation with the humility of knowing that in this job as a councilmember I will sometimes be misunderstood,” Yukimura says. “I hope some people will try to read my heart and will understand that it is my respect for relationships and ‘ohana, also a value of our host culture, that underlies my position, and my passionate belief that people can come together, respect and listen to each other and resolve an issue together.”Both sides of the debate acknowledge a lack of information on the health risks associated with genetically modified taro.Moratorium supporters say the temporary ban would provide time to learn more, but critics say it simply goes too far.The House Agriculture Committee deferred Senate Bill 958 on March 19.The council unanimously passed two separate taro-related resolutions in support of Senate Bill 2518 and Senate Bill 2915.The House referred Senate Bill 2518, which would provide $500,000 in grant funding for taro research, to the Ways and Means Committee.The House Finance Committee on Thursday passed an amended version of Senate Bill 2915, which would create a taro security and purity task force.County councils on Neighbor Islands have recently passed measures supporting Senate Bill 958. Big Island passed its resolution Jan. 24. Maui passed its version out of committee two weeks ago and it is expected to head to a full council for a vote yesterday.• Nathan Eagle, staff writer, can be reached at 245-3681 (ext. 224) or neagle@kauaipubco.com
Read more…

How to Eat Crow

How to Eat Crow...
Current mood: frustrated.gif betrayed
Category: WOW. How you treat people is how you show you valu Friends

definition of apology / definition of apologize

sorry-3.jpg

apologize

To make an apology.

apology

In interpersonal manners, an acceptance of responsibility for a wrong, plus a pledge to change one’s ways. The wrong may be either intentional or accidental; an apology is fitting in either case. The apology is usually made to the person or persons wronged, but may also be made to any third party to whom the wrongful act was evidence of untrustworthiness. The purpose of an apology is to put the listener at ease regarding the trustworthiness of the apologizing party.

An apology is not complete if it does not reflect all fo
four of these:
regret, understanding of the problem, acceptance of responsibility, and willingness to do better.


These are the necessary ingredients of a strong and reliable behavioral curb, a self-imposed restriction which the offender agrees to live by. It’s your best guarantee and assurance that the behavior will not happen again (in fact, that’s the whole purpose of an apology). If you don’t hear all of the above elements in the apology, ask for them. If the offender resists, be skeptical.


sorry-2-1.jpg

Apologies to Watch Out For

  • Backpedaling: Beware of people who apologize sincerely, but later back away from their apologies, bringing up the disagreement over and over in statements like "You hurt me when you corrected me," as though your correction of them was not deserved or was some kind of original offense against them. Be suspicious of people whose annoyance (at being corrected) outlasts their remorse.
  • The "Iffy" Apology: "I’m sorry if I hurt you." Beware that word "if," which means "Your pain is still hypothetical to me, not something I’m convinced of." It’s sometimes meant to call your perceptions into question, and to suggest that maybe you’re overreacting. If there’s no "if" about it, say so.
  • "I Don’t Know What I Did": Beware the ones who apologize but claim not to understand what they’ve done wrong (even though you’ve explained it perfectly well). Their remorse is probably sincere, but they have no idea what to avoid doing in the future, and so, your trust in such people would be misplaced.
  • The Attitude Apology and The "But" Apology: Any apology of the form "I’m sorry, but ____."
    Examples:
    • "I’m sorry, but you have to understand....";
    • "I’m sorry, but I was right to do that";
    • "I’m sorry, but you ____";
    • "I’m very sorry I did that, but I’ve moved on."

One thing I’ve learned about "I’m sorry, but" is that nothing before the "but" can safely be taken literally.

Remember that forgiveness only happens when someone regains your trust. And not until. Remind the offender of this, if necessary. People who value your trust (as the favor it is) are called friends, and will show concern for your happiness.


Apology-5.jpg

Fake Apologies and How to Recognize Them

While a true apology shows concern for the receiver, many fake apologies begin with "I’m sorry" but end with a point that is completely incompatible with remorse. Standing by what you did is not remorse, therefore not an apology.

  • Demanding to be forgiven is self-serving. A good general formula to help you recognize non-apologies is "If it’s self-serving, it’s not an apology."
  • Changing the subject is not an apology: "Well, what about what you did?" Changing the subject indicates an unwillingness to apologize.
  • Verbal abusers often show resistance to apologizing. Continuing to insist that what you’ve done was not verbal abuse somehow, or that verbal abuse is somehow not wrong, or that Wrong is somehow relative -- that’s not an apology. The point of apologizing is not to say that the crime still feels reasonable to you.
  • "I’m sorry but ____" is not an apology, because it does not communicate an understanding that you did wrong.
  • Any blaming of the receiver’s perceptions: "I’m sorry you perceived that I ____." Calling someone delusional is a tactic, not an apology. See Gaslighting, Definition of.
  • "You misunderstood." Pretending that your words didn’t mean what they mean, i.e. pretending that your words don’t have literal meaning, is not an apology.
  • "I’m sorry you misunderstood" is a more blatant, in-your-face form. Most often, when someone says "I’m sorry you misunderstood," neither is true.
  • Calling the receiver "ungrateful" for not instantly forgiving. In general, calling the receiver ethically defective, perceptually defective, etc., are not apologies, but are forms of gaslighting.
  • "But I didn’t do it on purpose!" The universal excuse of good intentions isn’t an apology; it’s an excuse for doing more of the same, for continuing to offend. It’s a childish belief that one can continue acting in a hurtful way as long as there is some nebulous "good intention" involved. Hitler apologists like to make use of this one, often in the form "He was only doing what he thought was best for his country, and that’s not so evil, is it?" Yes, in fact, it is. Don’t be taken in by excuses that look at the problem through the wrong end of the binoculars. Any offense can be described from such a high level that the problematic details conveniently disappear. But the motive behind the search for such a viewpoint isn’t really remorse, is it?
  • Saying "I don’t see the connection between my actions and your reaction" is not an apology. It’s a denial of responsibility. It’s a suggestion that the hearer overreacted.
  • "I’m sorry [but] you ____" is not an apology. It’s a blame-shift.
  • "I’m sorry you got all offended" is not an apology. It’s a slap. It’s a technique for adding insult to injury.
  • "I’m sorry you feel that way" is not an apology.
  • "I want to apologize" is no more an apology than "I want to lose weight" is a diet.
  • "I’m sorry about what happened" is not an apology, any more than saying "I hate when that happens." When someone says "I’m sorry about what happened," consider answering, "And...what was that, exactly? I’d just like to be sure we’re on the same page." People have been known to completely miss the point and apologize for the wrong thing.
  • Variant: "I regret that it happened." Referring to one’s actions as "what happened" is not an apology because the speaker is not taking responsibility. There are two kinds of phenomena: those which "just happen" (earthquakes, tornadoes, old trees falling down in the wind) and things which are caused by deliberate, chosen actions (like the house damaged by a tree which falls when a drunk driver collides with it). Of course, the drunk driver will usually claim "It was an accident," as if to say "I wasn’t the cause." This is merely propaganda, designed to trick the gullible.
  • "I’m sorry for what I did" is an improvement. Still, it leaves things unsaid; it doesn’t specify what the speaker did, perhaps even conceals it on purpose, perhaps because the speaker doesn’t understand or agree that what he/she did was wrong. What a pronoun is to a noun, this statement is to an apology. A complete apology is not vague; it doesn’t say "I’m sorry about...that thing I did." If the parties don’t agree as to the nature of the error, they don’t agree as to the meaning of the apology. The promise inherent in the apology has been left blurry.
    One sometimes sees this method used between nations. The thought process seems to be, "How small an apology can I offer while still causing the receiver to think I feel remorse?"
  • There are other ways of distancing oneself from responsibility. "That’s in the past" is an assertion that the passage of time is a substitute for an apology. It’s a suggestion that one is entitled to hurt others as long as no one notices for a very long time.
  • "We’ve both said unfortunate things" is not an apology. It’s an accusation. It’s inflammatory. It’s an attempt to shift the spotlight.
  • "I’m sorry about that. And now, isn’t there something you’d like to say to me?" An apology is not a quid pro quo -- reciprocation is not required, unless wrongdoing occurred in both directions. But if not, only an uncivilized person would apologize to you as a way of forcing an apology out of you.
  • Deathbed apologies are not necessarily real. Real apologies are not triggered by intense emotions or deadlines or expediency. True apologies are motivated by "I’m sorry for what I did," not "I’m sorry we weren’t close, I wish I could figure out why we weren’t."
  • "Of course I’m sorry" contains just a hint of annoyance. It’s a bit like saying "Am I sorry? What a silly question. What are you, stupid?"

Apology_Ring.jpg

Lectures Are Not Apologies.

Lecturing the victim/receiver is a particularly aggressive and defiant form of blame-shifting. Examples:

  • "Everybody makes mistakes" is not an apology. It’s an assertion that apologies shouldn’t be necessary. It’s roughly equivalent to saying "Get over it" and "Grow up" and "Start learning how the world works." It’s a form of talking down to people.
  • "People make mistakes." Lectures aren’t apologies. Basic pabulums accuse the listener of being simple-minded.
  • "You know, relationships are based on trust. If you won’t forgive me and start trusting me again, then I don’t know how we can have a relationship." Beware of people who refuse to prove themselves trustworthy. Beware of people who think forgiving them means you are the one who has to do all the work and all the changing.
  • "My religious Book says you have to forgive me." Again, self-serving remarks are not apologies.
  • Any suggestion that the victim needs to learn something, like a lesson or a skill (for example, not to overreact) is not an apology. An apology would be "I’m sorry I hurt you; *I* will learn from this."
  • "Get over it" and "Get past it" are not apologies; they’re attempts to trivialize the offense and to display unconcern for the hearer, to tell him or her "You are alone in this and nobody gets you."
  • "You need to learn to let go" is a lecture, is mildly pathologizing, is patronizing (a form of talking down) and is a kind of gaslighting.
  • Saying "Forgiveness is a choice!" is not an apology. Repentance is a choice too, and so is the lack of it.

sorry.jpg

How to Apologize: Stick to the Formula.

Apologies are learned behaviors; people don’t naturally offer apologies unless they know or have been taught the methods for apologizing: when to apologize, how to apologize, and how not to apologize.

Apologies would be so much easier if people would stick to the formula. "I want to apologize," they say, "but first I just want to add ONE more thing!" So they begin by giving you a brief apology, but then they botch it by adding something, like:

  • "You’re not perfect either, you know" (plus examples)
  • How disappointed they are in you, (and here’s why). OR
  • How disappointed they are in you, for presuming to correct them.

These are acts of defiance, not humility, and virtually guarantee that the apology will leave a bad aftertaste.

An apology has a beginning, a middle, and most importantly, an end. When you wish to apologize, just do it, and stop there. If you continue talking after you apologize, you’ll sound insincere. Do not tack on statements of conceit or propaganda to the effect that you’re a good person -- That little voice that tells you to continue talking after the apology is the same voice that would have you believe It’s All About You. You cannot simultaneously rub someone else’s back and polish your own halo.


apology-2.jpg

An Apology Does Not Require:

  • Groveling. Some offenders have a mindset in which only God and the powerful deserve a sincere apology.
    This mindset believes an apology is something given by an underling to an overlord -- that apologies are only about power, not about the restoration of relationships between equals. To them, an apology is a sign of submission.
    Absolute power creates absolute attitude. Look for this attitude in those who think little people like you don’t deserve any apology, ever. And look for it in the friend who’s been waiting for the opportunity to seize control of the relationship.
2ql739z.jpg

An Apology Does Not Include:

  • Belligerence. Saying "I’m sorry!!!" in a yelling, belligerent, or aggressive tone is certainly not very apologetic. Rather, it’s a demand that the recipient back down. It’s a threat which says "If you don’t drop the matter, I’ll raise the volume level."
  • Indignation. A real apology does not include indignation at having to apologize.
  • Trivialization. The words "I simply said" followed by a sanitized paraphrase of what the offender really said is not an apology, but a smoke screen.

apology-6.jpg

Before Accepting any Apology

Before accepting any apology, ask yourself: "Which of the following did I see?"

  • annoyance
  • blame shifting and suggestions that you misunderstood or overreacted
  • remorse

The less remorse you see, the more likely you are dealing with someone who doesn’t value your friendship, doesn’t fear losing it, and wouldn’t be sorry to see you go. You may wish to adjust your own efforts at reconciliation accordingly.

This advice holds true no matter who was at fault. Normal people, even blameless ones, will feel some guilt or dread at the thought of losing your friendship; but persons who show you defiance and attitude are feeling neither of those. Dread and guilt show you that there is a bond; that bond is the "glue" necessary to hold the friendship together until it mends.

sorry-4.gif

Sadness, grief and mourning are the normal reactions to the anticipated loss of a valued friendship. Annoyance, on the other hand, is what people feel when a computer crashes, or a pen runs out of ink, or a car fails to start; in general, whenever something that is there to be used doesn’t do its job.

5th edition. 07 Apr 2007

about the author much of this was abriged from:

J. E. Brown, relationship activist, decided in 1987 that verbal abuse will be wiped off the planet. He has been working on it ever since.

Some abridged adapted from "How Recipients React," at Letters of Reprimand and Correction

Read more…

ʻŌLELO MAOLI

'ŌLELO MAOLINATIVE LANGUAGE'Ōlelo 'alalā kahiko a'o 'Ewanoho po'ohiwi, noi kahuname ka leo huna kani oeoe o uka'Ōlelo a'e pū, kani pūpū kuahiwiKūpaianaha wale i ka lehulehu'A'apo wale i ke akeakamai - eAncient crow talk of 'Ewasitting [on the] shoulder, inquiring intentlywith the secret whistling voice of the uplandsTalking together, song of the mountain snailSo bewildering to the massesComprehensible only to the wise--------------------------Na wai na'e ka 'ole akamaii ke alanui ma'a i ka hele?Ma'a 'ia e o'u mau mākuaPāheahea i ka mea hele, he leoMe he leo hinihini ke kani ko'oNa Kahaukani e alaka'i maima ke alahula lōloa kai o KonaHo'oloa a'e i Kalaeloa uka - eBut who would not be wiseon the broad trails so familiar?Well-travelled by my ancestorsCalling as in welcome to the traveller, a voicelike a faint beckoning voice, the tapping of the caneIt is for the Kahaukani wind to guidealong the long familiar ocean trail of Kona (O'ahu)Extending to the uplands of Kalaeloa (Barber's Pt)-------------------------------------He lau lonomea ko HonouliuliHa'ilono i Nāpepeiao'ōleloHe lohe pepeiao, he 'ike maka nōE pu'ulau nā pūnana pueoHo'omāhuahua nā hulu pueoE hulu mākuaE hulu kūpunaE hulu maka'āinana - eSo many lonomea trees has HonouliuliSo the news spreads to Nāpepeiao'ōleloA thing heard, a thing seen indeed.May the nests of pueo proliferateGrowing in number the pueo's precious onesO beloved parentsO beloved eldersO most precious of the citizenry---------------------------------------Mai Pololū i Waipi'okani ka leo hanohano o ka 'ioMū ka mūkīkī o nā manuMaka'u i ke anu o ka wao lipoWao akua, wao kapu i ka waiolaMai ho'opani i ka wai holomoku - eFrom Pololü to Waipi'o[is heard] the proud voice of the hawkSilenced is the sipping of the honeycreepersFrightened in the cold of the deep forestRealm of akua, sacred realm of the water of lifeDon't attempt to block that torrent!---------------------------------------Hohonu wale ka hua kūpala'Ōilo Naulu Moa'ulanuiOla ka maka pehu o ka 'āinaHānai 'ia e nā kahu maopopo'Eia ke ola, ka wai ola, wai kupuKupu i ka uka o HālauaolaE ola e ka 'ōlelo maoli e!Deep lies the tuber of the kūpalaAwakened by the Naulu rain from Moa'ulanuiLife [comes to] the starving of the landNurtured by the care-takers who knowHere is life, the life-giving water, sprouting waterSprouting in the uplands of HālauaolaLong live the native language!-------------------------------------NOTES: I was on Lāna'i sitting in the leaf litter under olopua and lama trees. It was a good place to think about composing chant on the subject of 'ōlelo Hawai'i. Pieces of the following came then, and I jotted down the thoughts in my notepad. At the Lāna'i airport I tried to put together some of those thoughts, with the above result. Here are footnotes:The kahuna of 'Ewa, O'ahu, kept crows ('alalā) as helpers. They would converse with them to gain knowledge. This theme of language extending to all living things around us in the natural world continues with the voice of the native land snail, then later with the cry of the hawk, silencing the voices of the more common birds in the forest. The chant relies heavily on native plants and animals to convey its messages. The hawk symbolizes ali'i, and in this case, Kohala place names suggests Kamehameha, or pulling from earlier in history, Liloa and 'Umi. The water symbols evoke a call for sustenance and life, and an admonition is given not to block those waters. The dry lowland vine kūpala is used to symbolize Hawaiian language; once buried deep and nearly forgotten, like the underground tubers of the kūpala vines in the dry season. This plays on the 'ōlelo: "Kaho'olawe 'ai kūpala," and, like awakening sovereignty for Kaho'olawe (and the rest of the pae 'āina), the kūpala awakens with the Naulu rains of the wet season coming to Kaho'olawe (at Moa'ulanui), a source of sustenance for kanaka maoli, as 'ōlelo sustains our culture. "Ola ka makapehu o ka 'āina" pulls from the chant for the waters of Kāne as well as 'ōlelo no'eau. The language may endure only if cared for by those who realize that the language is life for Hawaiian culture. The place name Hālauaola was chosen because of the 'ōlelo no'eau: "Loa'a ke ola i Hālau-a-ola."Thanks to our group discussion, many images and ideas were offerred: trails, winds, sounds, listening, pueo, voices, sayings, guidance. This is what came out after sleeping on it (and a lot of lomilomi with the help of 'Ōlelo No'eau and the dictionary.) There is a paraphrase of Liholiho's response on a praise of his wisdom: "Na wai ho'i ka 'ole o ke akamai, he alanui i ma'a i ka hele 'ia e o'u mau mākua?" That path indeed lends the greatest familiarity in our endeavors. On that path one can hear the calling of those that preceded us, the distant voices, the tapping of the canes of the old ones on the well-travelled trail, guiding us as the Kahaukani wind guides those of the uplands of Mānoa down to the trails of the leeward side of O'ahu, that run along the coast to Kalaeloa. The second pauku begins in the uplands above Kalaeloa at Honouliuli, where grow the groves of native lonomea trees, [one can hear of them, or go and see them, as the saying "He lohe pepeiao" ("An item of hearsay") suggests], and in the gulches of Honouliuli, such as Nāpepeiao'ōlelo gulch, pueo build their nests. Pueo are used here in honor of Kumu Lake's family 'aumakua, while the nests evoke the growing Pūnana Leo, and the result, children who speak Hawaiian, are the link of continuity to parents, kūpuna and the citizenry (hulu mākua, hulu kūpuna, and hulu maka'āinana are all traditional poetic terms referring to these beloved subsets of the community).Other minor allusions: kūpaianaha -- so much of ancient Hawaiian thought is bewildering to modern people. kani ko'o -- (the sound of the cane) from chants asking for long life, until a cane is needed for walking. alahula -- (familiar path) as in "alahula Pu'uloa a 'o Ka'ahupāhau" (a famous saying for 'Ewa). maka'u i ke anu -- (frightened in the cold) out of a chant dedicated to Kāne. All of the minor allusions are meant to evoke familiarity to those who recognize them, and to introduce the phrases to those less familiar, so that when they hear similar phrasing later, it will come more readily.
Read more…
Treatment of native Hawaiians is the same as for native Americans They both fall under the Secretary of the Interior and not the State Department. This means that the (BIA) Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Intra-agency of Hawaiian Affairs (Akaka Bill instrument) are subject to the same policy. US Congress will have plenary authority over both entities; that is, US Congress will have superior /complete authority over them. Interior relates to all concerns within the USA whereas the State Department deals with foreign nations, governments, and entities. This should already tell you that a nation within a nation is mythical and a play on feel-good semantics.There is no self-determination if Congress has the last say of what you can and cannot do. The following data of 1871 spells it out:1871Senate declares that Indian nations will no longer be recognized as independent powers with whom treaties can be contracted. 1871: As part of President U. S. Grant's so-called "peace policy," 71 Indian agencies are assigned to various denominations. This was meant to end corruption in the Bureau of Indian Affairs and assign Christian missionaries the task of working with the tribes. The Lutheran churches were assigned the Sac and Fox Reservation, now the Mesquakie Indian Reservation near Tama, Iowa.The definition of a nation: it has a people, territory, constitution and laws, government, and have the capacity to contract treaties with other nations. A nation-state is internationally recognized as external sovereignty while holding internal sovereignty. Since Hawaii acquired recognition through its compacts and over 25 ratified treaties throughout the world with 96 legations and consuls around the world, it became part of the Family of Nations (the frontrunner of the League of Nations and the United Nations) as an active international member and peers to all recognized nations including the USA.The infamous events created by the USA deem the Hawaiian Kingdom as still existing, albeit under the US belligerent occupation. All of their unlawful actions become fraudulant, null and void. The Ku'e Petitions reaffirms the will of the Hawaii nationals. President Cleveland declared US actions as an act of war and breaching the ratified treaties between both the USA and the Kingdom of Hawai'i; acknowledging conclusively the US belligerent occupation of a favored, friendly, neutral nation.What Akaka Bill is offering are the surrender of the Hawaiian Kingdom, and relegating the majority of the Hawaii nationals as a tribal, native American under the plenary authority of Congress and subject to their laws; the compliance to negotiate the lands and resources of the Hawaiian Kingdom in exchange for wardship; the creation of a tribal governing entity to replace the Hawaiian Kingdom, the trust lands would no longer be held in trust and some lands would be partitioned for the tribal Hawaiians as in DHHL.The rammification in all of this would be that the Kingdom lands would be surrendered to the USA; status quo for the State of Hawaii, certain funding for programs for native Hawaiians. Add to this will be the issue of blood quantum which means Congress could eliminate one from the roll if one has less than 25% maoli blood. This would disenfranchise majority of the Hawaii nationals. The other point is Congress at anytime can revoke recognition of the tribe as it has done in the past. In other words, they can make native Hawaiians cease to exist as a native American group and Hawaiians will just be US Americans with no special conditions as a native anything.So the question is, do you want to give up your status as a Hawaii National with all its rights and privileges, or become a native American subjugated to the USA? You want the ownership of the whole pie that is rightfully yours or lap up the crumbs that they condescendingly toss your way if they choose to do so? Think about it the next time you are enjoying a sandwich whle birds gather to wait for crumbs you drop or toss their way.
Read more…

Appreciating...

Sometimes opportunity comes knocking...& Sometimes it comes crashing through your door...l_119df36be08719e39586054ab3bdd2a7.jpgMost of the people I run into all ask me, "Eh, I heard you went to Japan by yourself. You wasn't scared?" Granted there were times when I was really worried because I thought I was lost & had no way to get ahold of anyone, but other than that, no. Granted it's not like traveling between the islands or even to the continent, which I've done by myself countless times, but it isn't that bad. Your butt hurts after sitting for 8+ hours sometimes, but at least you have the opportunity to catch up on sleep. I normally go when it's the end of Fall season & turning into Winter, so it's a bit chilly. That's fun, especially since I like the cold. The foods super good & it's a lot of fun going shopping cause they have awesome electronics (I'm sure you've seen some of it on tv).img256.jpgI guess it helps that I'm stupid gutsy. I figure things out by myself, or ask questions when I'm not 100% sure, especially considering I'm in another country where I don't speak a lick of the language. Plus, I knew I would be with people I've already met before, who, by the way, eventually taught me a few words & phrases. This last time, though, I had to stay at a hotel by myself, which wasn't so bad if you don't mind sleeping in a closet. At least I had my own bathroom & it was quiet, plus they have crazy funny commercials & tv shows, so I can't complain. The part where the stupid gutsy comes into play now.. I told the girls (the ones who were supposed to be taking care of me) they didn't need to pick me up from my hotel anymore, I'd go to my classes by myself. They were shocked & worried, but I told them no.100_1534.jpgWhenever I emailed my mom, I'd tell her I was traveling around by myself, & she'd just laugh cause she knows I'm like that. I crave independance after a while. But she did commend me for being so "gung ho" cause she wouldn't do that if she were me. Not in no foreign country. It was nice being able to come & go as I please, not be bound by having to be at a certain place at a certain time (other than for class times) & making sure I got off at this station, wait for so-&-so to get me, blah blah blah. This last trip, however, was a bit more special since my mom & some others were coming up. I'd been there for over 3 weeks, so it was nice to see some Polynesian faces. It was also really nice to hear pidgin. Ah, so comforting. Plus it was just plain nice to have my mom.img169.jpgThen the next day, boom, I get sick. Ugh. I caught the flu from one of the girls I had been staying with. Some of the others were sick too, so I'm sure that added to it. I think it was made worse from jumping back & forth between the cold (outside) & super heated (the trains, the subway, inside stores & restaurants, etc). Luckily my mom had brought some meds, so at least I had semi relief in the form of codeine. Lovely. Knocked out for two days straight. I was already tired, so it didn't even phase me that I was sleeping for 2-3-4 hours at a time. And thank you Japan for having a 7-11 or Sunkus on every block cause I always had halls & juice in my room or in hand. Plus they have vending machine everywhere! Including in my hotel (even though that one sucked cause it didn't have much variety). But I still had fun. Why?img257.jpgCause we went to "the happiest place on earth"! Yeah, okay, so I was hella grouchy & nauseated, but at least I rode everything! Plus I got to buy some Winnie the Pooh stuff (That made me happy). The rest of the trip went on with me dragging my butt around, hanky & cough drops in tow, minus all the hugging & kissing on the cheek from the hundreds of screaming Japanese girls who were hanging on every word & movement I made, who were now asking, "Mahine-chan oh-k?", but there still was work that needed to be done before the trip was through. Then we had 2 parties to go to. One is pretty much just a blur cause I was still hazy. The other one went off with me not knowing there was alcohol in my juice until I had tanked 5 or 6 glasses. My sister was already drunk by the time we figured it out. Drunk, Under-age, & in another country.. How fun!l_e59f7cea43e4d861b3243f35367bd490.jpgThe next morning it was off to Thailand! Who knew I'd go to Bangkok? One of the lady's from Japan came with us, & she'd been there tons of times before, so she knew what it was like. Yikes. Besides the slums, filth, stench, traffic, & crazy tourists hitting on Thai girls (whom, *uh hem*, it was obvious were not all "girl"), it was actually pretty fun. Before my mom them came to Japan, the lady was asking me questions, like if I'd researched about Thailand & if I knew what I wanted to do. She told me think about one thing I wanted to do, & she'd tell everyone else to do the same, then we'd all go & do these things together. Ha!, sure! I decide I wanna ride an elephant. Come to find out, the elephants are in the North, we were in the South, & getting there would be a 3 hour flight. BOO.l_8b91211876154743c4d72a4439a69e23.jpgWhat's my next choice? Snakes. I wanna see one & I definitely wanted to hold one, or at least touch one. The lady practically faints cause she hates snakes. So of course she didn't wanna go to that. Aunty didn't really wanna do anything but just hang out. "Warden" was infatuated with getting a real Thai massage & checking out the different types (they had some kind of milk one that set him off), so he wasn't into it. "Meary" was infatuated with meeting all these dudes he met online (let's not even go there with that one). & my mom was like, "My crazy daughter wants to play with snakes, ohhh-kay, let's go find some snakes then." I guess she thought it would kill my fascination with wanting to own one. Nope. I think it made it worse. Heh. I got to hold one big bugger, so that made my trip. Plus the heat helped me get over the flu.100_1560.jpgI feel blessed that I was able to travel so much, but I did, however, semi recently make some drastic changes in my life & did decide to cut ties with something & someone who was very important to me. It's because of that, I thought I wouldn't be going back to Japan for a while, except if I paid for it myself. But recently my super close friend told me he'll be sending me back to teach his classes for him. He's gonna get super busy soon, so he wants to send someone he trusts & knows can cover. Plus it helps I kindda know my way around & I do know people there incase I need help. I already know he trusts me, but to trust me enough to let me cover these classes for him is beyond belief right now. & to know he believes in me so much that he's sending me with no restrictions & he's literally telling me to do whatever comes up, now that's something else.100_1626.jpgI'm used to being told, "Do this. Do that. Don't do this. Don't do that. You have to, You have to, You have." There's literally a light that's been turned on & I'm realizing things didn't need to be the way they were. The grass really is greener! I don't regret anything that happened, but now knowing that things can be so much better, so much simpler, so much happier, I can never see myself going back to the way things were. I cherish the memories I have, appreciative the opportunities I was given, but I'm a hundred times more excited about the future. I thank my Kupunas for bringing me to my senses.
Read more…

PROMO FOR THE MILITARY

l_60c2abb0830ffdff235994af8d59d945.jpgarmy3.jpgWANT TO LIVE IN PARADISE FOR FREE ? JOIN DA MILITARY! SIGN ON DA DOTTED LINE , COST? YOUR SOUL & THE INNOCENT THAT YOU HELP GENOCIDE FOR GREED!CLICK AND LEARNILLEGAL OCCUPATION = STOLEN LAND and HIGHER PRICES=THE BIGGEST BULLSHIT & PROMO OF THE MILITARY & PUPPET GOVERNMENT, CAN'T SPREAD IT ANY THICKER THEN THIS !IN A FALSE FLAG MADE FOR PROFIT & GREED WAR!ALL THE $$$ TO PUSH THIS & PROMOTE WAR & GENOCIDE!WHILE CUTTING 27 MILLION SET ASIDE FOR HOMELESS...SO MANY KANAKA MAOLI HOMELESS LIVING DAY TO DAY STREET TO BEACH,911replay2.jpgA_getMAA3-1.jpg
Read more…

a post in kaulana mahina, not yet posted....

kkkk wait...i have another question to the question....sorry for being a pain....but this thought came up in my "research"....what about this theory for moons and gods - its all relative to your "role" in society....health doctors - laau nites (which involve gods and offerings and hana towards those gods for those nights)...fisherman - ku nights - which involved malama ko'a and things dealing with ku gods, a certain type of heiau might use certain nights and others would use different nights....all these different hana that they do are done in relation to those moons, and the gods tied to those moons....i can't think of a night not tied to a godly activity....
Read more…

Noe York

Just returned from a conference sponsored by the Institute for Comparative Literature and Society at Columbia University. The conference entitled, "Comparing, Editing, Translating: Periodicals and Interdisciplinary Journals Today" addressed the subject of academic and non-academic journals and periodicals in attempting, encouraging and inciting interdisciplinary and comparative work. Our panel on "Public Discourse, Post-colonialism, Globalization and Comparativism" included another presenter from South Africa, sometime contributing writer to The Nation, Mark Gevisser, and Editor of the Journal of Spanish and Cultural Studies, Jo Labanyi. My paper on 'Oiwi a Native Hawaiian Journal placed the origin of the journal within the context of a complex multi-ethnic/indigenous Hawai'i, the globe's pass-through-place for tourists, military personnel and migrants/immigrants. In suggesting this view of Hawai'i I also discuss the difficulties of proclaiming native subjectivity in a place which for most people serves as "Paradise."'Oiwi was the brain-na'au child of founding editor Mahealani Dudoit, who sought to counter the charge that no serious Hawaiian literature existed. She and co-editor Ku'ualoha Ho'omanawanui took issue with the claim that the phrase "Hawaiian-writer" was an oxymoron. In my paper I talked about how 'Oiwi actively sought out contributers for its first three journals, and addressed the subject of audience creation. 'Oiwi is a success in terms of finding a niche in other indigenous communities, schools, and homes, inspiring other native communities to produce their own journals and publications.My paper discussed the politics of 'Oiwi's language and translation policies within the colonial context of Hawai'i. This conference was sponsored by Professor Gayatri Spivak and was attended by writers and editors from distinguished journals such as Signs, The Journal of Pacific History, PMLA, New German Critique, The London Review of Books, The Nation, Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, just to name a few. Having meals with professors, editors and authors and listening to their presentations I find quickens my mind and helps me to think of a thousand other projects that could be launched from home. Also, these kinds of gatherings force me to think about my work in different ways. New York, Boston, London, New Zealand, Tahiti, Rapa Nui---from these vantage points I feel I am able to see home from different perspectives, since one always has to formulate and re-formulate "home" in speaking to people from "away." In this mode of translating I discover more clearly what Hawai'i/home means to me and am able then to resituate or reconfigure my own work. Also taking up the subject of where Hawai'i fits in relation to larger global schemes and processes I find liberating, transforming, like taking a break from battle and looking at the map anew. I can abandon my preconceived notions of how things are stuck at an impasse, mired in the muck of everyday challenges, by thinking about the difficulties facing people in the Caribbean, India or South Africa I rethink my orientation to problems in Hawai'i. I have learned much and hope to continue to do so. I am very grateful for these opportunities.Na'u na Noelani
Read more…

countdown to school.

(*#&%)$&)($&^()$&%)#$!rawr. so spring break is officially over TODAY. didn't go the way i thought it would. booo. haha, but gahhdamn. school is back in session tomorrow. one more term then tahdahh! graduation. yeeeee. hahaha; i know i know; i didn't even complete scholarships yet. shhh. errgh. okay; i'm off, for now. until next time, laterrrrrs.
Read more…

Pearl Harbor 41

911_treason.jpg911replay.jpggreed-1.jpggreed2.gif

Pearl Harbor 41
News
Political Treachery
Reviews
Comments
Biography

Day of Deceit...Uncovers the secret military documents withheld from Congress and the American public for over sixty years. For the first time in publishing you can read and examine the key documents.
  • The US Navy's eight point Overt Act of War strategy adopted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt that lured Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.
  • The 1941 Japanese naval radio intercepts.
  • Presidential and U.S. Army and Naval dispatches ordering American Pacific commanders to stand aside and let Japan commit the first overt act of war.
  • Discover six years of Pearl Harbor hoaxes intended to deceive the American public and congress.
  • Follow the Japanese naval spy who was allowed carte blanche to spy on and prepare bomb plots of Pearl Harbor.
simon_schuster.gif
Pearl Harbor was not an accident, a mere failure of American intelligence, or a brilliant Japanese military coup.
It was the result of a carefully orchestrated design, originated in the Office of Naval Intelligence. According to a key memorandum, eight actions were
taken to make sure America would enter the war by this means. Pearl Harbor was the only way, leading officials felt, to galvanize the reluctant American public into action.
This great question of Pearl Harbor--what did we know and
PEARL HARBOR

MOTHER OF ALL

CONSPIRACIES


"...everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States..." ARMY BOARD, 1944

Japanese version Japanese language version of this page
President Roosevelt (FDR) provoked the attack, knew about it in advance and covered up his failure to warn the Hawaiian commanders. FDR needed the attack to sucker Hitler to declare war, since the public and Congress were overwhelmingly against entering the war in Europe. It was his backdoor to war.
FDR blinded the commanders at Pearl Harbor and set them up by --
1. denying intelligence to Hawaii (HI)
2. on November 27 and later, misleading the commanders into thinking negotiations with Japan were continuing to prevent them from realizing the war was on
3. having false information sent to HI about the location of the Japanese carrier fleet.

BACKGROUND

1904 - The Japanese destroyed the Russian navy in a surprise attack in
undeclared war.
1932 - In the Grand Joint Army-Navy Exercises, 152 aircraft carrier planes caught the defenders of Pearl Harbor completely by surprise. It was a Sunday.
1938 - Admiral Ernst King led a carrier-born airstrike from the USS Saratoga successfully against Pearl Harbor in another exercise.1940 - FDR ordered the fleet transferred from the West Coast to its exposed position in Hawaii and ordered the fleet remain stationed at Pearl Harbor over complaints by its commander Admiral Richardson that there was inadequate protection from air attack and no protection from torpedo attack. Richardson felt so strongly that he twice disobeyed orders to berth his fleet there and he raised the issue personally with FDR in October and he was soon after replaced. His successor, Admiral Kimmel, also brought up the same issues with FDR in June 1941.
7 Oct 1940 - Navy IQ analyst McCollum wrote an 8 point memo on how to force Japan into war with US. Beginning the next day FDR began to put them into effect and all 8 were eventually accomplished.11 November 1940 - 21 aged British planes destroyed the Italian fleet, including 3 battleships, at their homeport in the harbor of Taranto in Southern Italy by using technically innovative shallow-draft torpedoes.
11 February 1941 - FDR proposed sacrificing 6 cruisers and 2 carriers at Manila to get into war. Navy Chief Stark objected: "I have previously opposed this and you have concurred as to its unwisdom. Particularly do I recall your remark in a previous conference when Mr. Hull suggested (more forces to Manila) and the question arose as to getting them out and your 100% reply, from my standpoint, was that you might not mind losing one or two cruisers, but that you did not want to take a chance on losing 5 or 6." (Charles Beard PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT AND THE COMING OF WAR 1941, p 424)March 1941 - FDR sold munitions and convoyed them to belligerents in Europe -- both acts of war and both violations of international law -- the Lend-Lease Act.
23 Jun 1941 - Advisor Harold Ickes wrote FDR a memo the day after Germany invaded the Soviet Union, "There might develop from the embargoing of oil to Japan such a situation as would make it not only possible but easy to get into this war in an effective way. And if we should thus indirectly be brought in, we would avoid the criticism that we had gone in as an ally of communistic Russia." FDR was pleased with Admiral Richmond Turner's report read July 22: "It is generally believed that shutting off the American supply of petroleum will lead promptly to the invasion of Netherland East Indies...it seems certain she would also include military action against the Philippine Islands, which would immediately involve us in a Pacific war." On July 24 FDR told the Volunteer Participation Committee, "If we had cut off the oil off, they probably would have gone down to the Dutch East Indies a year ago, and you would have had war." The next day FDR froze all Japanese assets in US cutting off their main supply of oil and forcing them into war with the US. Intelligence information was withheld from Hawaii from this point forward.14 August - At the Atlantic Conference, Churchill noted the "astonishing depth of Roosevelt's intense desire for war." Churchill cabled his cabinet "(FDR) obviously was very determined that they should come in."
18 October - diary entry by Secretary of Interior Harold Ickes: "For a long time I have believed that our best entrance into the war would be by way of Japan."

CODES

Purple Code - the top Japanese diplomatic machine cipher which used automatic telephone switches to separately and differently encipher each character sent. It was cracked by the Army Signal Intelligence Service (331 men).J-19 was the main Japanese diplomatic code book. This columnar code was cracked.
Coral Machine Cipher or JNA-20 was a simplified version of Purple used by Naval attaches. Only one message deciphered prior to Pearl Harbor has been declassified.AD or Administrative Code wrongly called Admiralty Code was an old four character transposition code used for personnel matters. No important messages were sent in this weak code. Introduced Nov 1938, it was seldom used after Dec 1940.
Magic - the security designation given to all decoded Japanese diplomatic messages. It's hard not to conclude with historians like Charles Bateson that "Magic standing alone points so irresistibly to the Pearl Harbor attack that it is inconceivable anybody could have failed to forecast the Japanese move." The NSA reached the same conclusion in 1955.Ultra - the security designation for decoded military messages.
JN-25 - The Japanese Fleet's Cryptographic System, a.k.a. 5 number code (Sample). JN stands for Japanese Navy, introduced 1 June 1939. This was a very simple old-type code book system used by the American Army and Navy in 1898 and abandoned in 1917 because it was insecure. Version A has a dictionary of 5,600 numbers, words and phrases, each given as a five figure number. These were super-enciphered by addition to random numbers contained in a second code book. The dictionary was only changed once before PH on Dec 1, 1940, to a slightly larger version B but the random book was changed every 3 to 6 months- last on Aug 1. The Japanese blundered away the code when they introduced JN25-B by continuing to use, for 2 months, random books that had been previously solved by the Allies. That was the equivalent of handing over the JN-25B dictionary. It was child's play for the Navy group OP-20-G (738 men whose primary responsibility was Japanese naval codes) to reconstruct the exposed dictionary. In 1994 the NSA published that JN-25B was completely cracked in December 1940. In January 1941 the US gave Britain two JN-25B code books with keys and techniques for deciphering. Churchill wrote "From the end of 1940 the Americans had pierced the vital Japanese ciphers, and were decoding large numbers of their military and diplomatic telegrams."(GRAND ALLIANCE p 598) The official US Navy statement on JN-25B is the NAVAL SECURITY GROUP HISTORY TO WORLD WAR II prepared by Captain J. Holtwick in June 1971, page 398: "By 1 December 1941 we had the code solved to a readable extent." Chief of Navy codebreaking Safford reported that during 1941 "The Navy COMINT team did a thorough job on the Japanese Navy with no help from the Army."(SRH-149) The first paragraph of the Congressional Report Exhibit 151 says the US was "currently" (instantly) reading JN-25B and exchanging the "translations" with the British prior to Pearl Harbor.
The top Navy codebreaker wrote in Cryptologia, July 1982: "So far as inherent security was concerned, JN-25B was little better than the ciphers used by Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar. The vocabulary was in Japanese - supplemented by Chinese characters - and the difficulties of written Japanese afforded more security and occasioned more difficulty than the crypto-system."
The entire Pearl Harbor scheme was laid out in this code. In 1979 the NSA released 2,413 JN-25 orders of the 26,581 intercepted by US between Sept 1 and Dec 4, 1941. The NSA says "We know now that they contained important details concerning the existence, organization, objective, and even the whereabouts of the Pearl Harbor Strike Force." (Parker, PH Revisited p 21) Of the over thousand radio messages sent by Tokyo to the attack fleet, only 20 are in the National Archives. All messages to the attack fleet were sent several times, at least one message was sent every odd hour of the day and each had a special serial number. Starting in early November 1941 when the attack fleet assembled and started receiving radio messages, OP-20-G stayed open 24 hours a day and the "First Team" of codebreakers worked on JN-25. In November and early December 1941, OP-20-G spent 85 percent of its effort reading Japanese Navy traffic, 12 percent on Japanese diplomatic traffic and 3 percent on German naval codes. FDR was personally briefed twice a day on JN-25 traffic by his aide, Captain John Beardell, and demanded to see the original raw messages in English. The US Government refuses to identify or declassify any pre-Dec 7, 1941 decrypts of JN-25 on the basis of national security, a half-century after the war.

WARNINGS

Warnings do no harm and might do inexpressible good

  • 27 January 1941, Dr. Ricardo Shreiber, the Peruvian envoy in Tokyo told Max Bishop, third secretary of the US embassy that he had just learned from his intelligence sources that there was a war plan involving a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
  • 31 March 1941 - A Navy report by Bellinger and Martin predicted that if Japan made war on the US, they would strike Pearl Harbor without warning at dawn with aircraft from a maximum of 6 carriers. For years Navy planners had assumed that Japan, on the outbreak of war, would strike the American fleet wherever it was - it was the greatest danger from Japan. The fleet was the only threat to Japan's plans. The fleet at Pearl Harbor was the only High Value Target. Logically, Japan couldn't engage in any major operation with the American fleet on its flank. Initial seriously crippling attacks on the US fleet in Hawaii would be the only chance the Japanese military would have for eventual victory. The strategic options for the Japanese were not unlimited.
  • 10 July - US Military Attache Smith-Hutton at Tokyo reported Japanese Navy secretly practicing aircraft torpedo attacks against capital ships in Ariake Bay. The bay closely resembles Pearl Harbor.
  • July - The US Military Attache in Mexico forwarded a report that the Japanese were constructing special small submarines for attacking the American fleet in Pearl Harbor, and that a training program then under way included towing them from Japan to positions off the Hawaiian Islands, where they practiced surfacing and submerging.
  • 10 August 1941, the top British agent, code named "Tricycle", Dusko Popov, told the FBI of the planned attack on Pearl Harbor and that it would be soon. The FBI told him that his information was "too precise, too complete to be believed. The questionnaire plus the other information you brought spell out in detail exactly where, when, how, and by whom we are to be attacked. If anything, it sounds like a trap." He also reported that a senior Japanese naval person had gone to Taranto to collect all secret data on the attack there and that it was of utmost importance to them. The info was given to Naval IQ.
  • Early in the Fall, Kilsoo Haan, an agent for the Sino-Korean People's League, told Eric Severeid of CBS that the Korean underground in Korea and Japan had positive proof that the Japanese were going to attack Pearl Harbor before Christmas. Among other things, one Korean had actually seen the plans. In late October, Haan finally convinced US Senator Guy Gillette that the Japanese were planning to attack. Gillette alerted the State Department, Army and Navy Intelligence and FDR personally.
  • 24 September 1941, the "bomb plot" message in J-19 code from Japan Naval Intelligence to Japan' s consul general in Honolulu requesting grid of exact locations of ships pinpointed for the benefit of bombardiers and torpedo pilots was deciphered. There was no reason to know the EXACT location of ships in harbor, unless to attack them - it was a dead giveaway. Chief of War Plans Turner and Chief of Naval Operations Stark repeatedly kept it and warnings based on it prepared by Safford and others from being passed to Hawaii. The chief of Naval Intelligence Captain Kirk was replaced because he insisted on warning HI. It was lack of information like this that lead to the exoneration of the Hawaii commanders and the blaming of Washington for unpreparedness for the attack by the Army Board and Navy Court. At no time did the Japanese ever ask for a similar bomb plot for any other American military installation. Why the Roosevelt administration allowed flagrant Japanese spying on PH has never been explained, but they blocked 2 Congressional investigations in the fall of 1941 to allow it to continue. The bomb plots were addressed to "Chief of 3rd Bureau, Naval General Staff", marked Secret Intelligence message, and given special serial numbers, so their significance couldn't be missed. There were about 95 ships in port. The text was:
  • Simple traffic analysis of the accelerated frequency of messages from various Japanese consuls gave a another identification of war preparations, from Aug-Dec there were 6 messages from Seattle, 18 from Panama, 55 from Manila and 68 from Hawaii.
  • Oct. - Soviet top spy Richard Sorge, the greatest spy in history, informed the Kremlin that Pearl Harbor would be attacked within 60 days. Moscow informed him that this was passed to the US. Interestingly, all references to Pearl Harbor in the War Department's copy of Sorge's 32,000 word confession to the Japanese were deleted. NY Daily News, 17 May 1951.
  • 16 Oct. - FDR grossly humiliated Japan's Ambassador and refused to meet with Premier Konoye to engineer the war party, lead by General Tojo, into power in Japan.
  • 1 Nov. - JN-25 Order to continue drills against anchored capital ships to prepare to "ambush and completely destroy the US enemy." The message included references to armor-piercing bombs and 'near surface torpedoes.'
  • 13 Nov. - The German Ambassador to US Dr. Thomsen told US IQ that Pearl Harbor would be attacked.
  • 14 Nov. - Japanese Merchant Marine was alerted that wartime recognition signals would be in effect Dec 1.
  • 22 Nov. - Tokyo said to Ambassador Nomura in Washington about extending the deadline for negotiations to November 29: "...this time we mean it, that the deadline absolutely cannot be changed. After that things are automatically going to happen."
  • CIA Director Allen Dulles told people after the war that US was warned in mid-November 1941 that the Japanese Fleet had sailed east past Tokyo Bay and was going to attack Pearl Harbor. CIA FOIA
  • 23 Nov. - JN25 order - "The first air attack has been set for 0330 hours on X-day." (Tokyo time or 8 A.M. Honolulu time)
  • 25 Nov. - British decrypted the Winds setup message sent Nov. 19. The US decoded it Nov. 28. It was a J-19 Code message that there would be an attack and that the signal would come over Radio Tokyo as a weather report - rain meaning war, east (Higashi) meaning US.
  • 25 Nov. - Secretary of War Stimson noted in his diary "FDR stated that we were likely to be attacked perhaps as soon as next Monday." FDR asked: "the question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot without too much danger to ourselves. In spite of the risk involved, however, in letting the Japanese fire the first shot, we realized that in order to have the full support of the American people it was desirable to make sure that the Japanese be the ones to do this so that there should remain no doubt in anyone's mind as to who were the aggressors."
  • 25 Nov. - Navy Department ordered all US trans-Pacific shipping to take the southern route. PHH 12:317 (PHH = 1946 Congressional Report, vol. 12, page 317) ADM Turner testified "We sent the traffic down to the Torres Straight, so that the track of the Japanese task force would be clear of any traffic." PHH 4:1942
  • 25 Nov. - Yamamoto radioed this order in JN-25: " (a) The task force, keeping its movements strictly secret and maintaining close guard against submarines and aircraft, shall advance into Hawaiian waters and upon the very opening of hostilities, shall attack the main force of the United States Fleet in Hawaii and deal it a mortal blow. The raid is planned for dawn on X-day -- exact date to be given by later order. (b) Should the negotiations with the US prove successful, the task force shall hold itself in readiness forthwith to return and reassemble. (c) The task force will move out of Hitokappu Wan on the morning of 26 November and advance to the standing-by position on the afternoon of 4 December and speedily complete refueling." ( Order to sail - scan from the PHA Congressional Hearings Report, vol 1 p 180, transcript p 437-8) This was decoded by the British on November 25 and the Dutch on November 27. When it was decoded by the US is a national secret, however, on November 26 Naval Intelligence reported the concentration of units of the Japanese fleet at an unknown port ready for offensive action.
  • 26 Nov. 3 A.M. - Churchill sent an urgent secret message to FDR, probably containing above message. This message caused the greatest agitation in DC. Stark testified under oath that "On November 26 there was received specific evidence of the Japanese intention to wage offensive war against Great Britain and the United States." C.I.A. Director William Casey, who was in the OSS in 1941, in his book The Secret War Against Hitler, p 7, wrote "The British had sent word that a Japanese fleet was steaming east toward Hawaii." Washington, in an order of Nov 26 as a result of the "first shot" meeting the day before, ordered both US aircraft carriers, the Enterprise and the Lexington out of Pearl Harbor "as soon as practicable." This order included stripping Pearl of 50 planes or 40 percent of its already inadequate fighter protection. In response to Churchill's message, FDR secretly cabled him that afternoon - "Negotiations off. Services expect action within two weeks." Note that the only way FDR could have linked negotiations with service action, let alone have known the timing of the action, was if he had the message to sail. In other words, the only service action contingent on negotiations was Pearl Harbor.
  • 26 Nov. - the "most fateful document " was Hull's ultimatum that Japan must withdraw from Indochina and all China. FDR's Ambassador to Japan called this "The document that touched the button that started the war."
  • 27 Nov. - Secretary of War Stimson sent a confused and confusing hostile action possible or DO-DON'T warning. The Navy Court found this message directed attention away from Pearl Harbor, rather than toward it. One purpose of the message was to mislead HI into believing negotiations were continuing. The Army which could not do reconnaissance was ordered to and the Navy which could was ordered not to. The Army was ordered on sabotage alert, which specifically precluded attention to outside threat. Navy attention was misdirected 5000 miles from HI. DC repeated, no less than three times as a direct instruction of the President, "The US desires that Japan commit the first overt act Period." It was unusual that FDR directed this warning, a routine matter, to Hawaii which is proof that he knew other warnings were not sent. A simple question--what Japanese "overt act" was FDR expecting at Pearl Harbor? He ordered sabotage prevented and subs couldn't enter, that leaves air attack. The words "overt act" disclose FDR's intent - not just that Japan be allowed to attack but that they inflict damage on the fleet. This FDR order to allow a Japanese attack was aid to the enemy - explicit treason.
  • 29 Nov.- Hull sat in Layfayette Park across from the White House with ace United Press reporter Joe Leib and showed him a message stating that Pearl Harbor would be attacked on December 7. This could well have been the Nov. 26 message from Churchill. The New York Times in its 12/8/41 PH report on page 13 under the headline "Attack Was Expected" stated the US had known a week before that Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked. Perhaps Leib wasn't the only reporter Hull told.
  • 29 Nov. - The FBI embassy wiretap made an intercept of an uncoded plain-text Japanese international telephone conversation between Ambassador Kurusu in Washington and the Chief Foreign Officer in Tokyo K. Yamamoto in which
    an Embassy functionary asked 'Tell me, what zero hour is. Otherwise, I won't be able to carry on diplomacy.' The voice from Tokyo said softly, 'Well then, I will tell you. Zero hour is December 8 at Pearl Harbor.' (US Navy translation 29 Nov 41 - remember Dec 8 Tokyo time is December 7 US time)
  • 30 Nov. US Time (or 1 Dec. Tokyo time) - The Japanese fleet was radioed this Imperial Naval Order (JN-25): "JAPAN, UNDER THE NECESSITY OF HER SELF-PRESERVATION AND SELF-DEFENSE, HAS REACHED A POSITION TO DECLARE WAR ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA." (Congress Appendix D, p 415). US ally China also recovered it in plain text from a shot-down Japanese Army plane near Canton that evening. This caused an emergency Imperial Conference because they knew the Chinese would give the information to GB and US. In a related J-19 message the next day, the US translated elaborate instructions from Japan dealing in precise detail with the method of internment of American nationals in Asia "on the outbreak of war with England and the United States"
  • 1 Dec. - Office of Naval Intelligence, ONI, Twelfth Naval District in San Francisco found the missing Japanese fleet by correlating reports from the four wireless news services and several shipping companies that they were getting strange signals west of Hawaii. The Soviet Union also knew the exact location of the Japanese fleet because they asked the Japanese in advance to let one of their ships pass (Layton, And I Was There p 261). This info was most likely given to them by US because Sorge's spy ring was rolled up November 14. All long-range PBY patrols from the Aleutians were ordered stopped on Dec 6 to prevent contact.
  • 1 Dec. - Foreign Minister Togo cabled Washington Ambassador Nomura to continue negotiations "to prevent the U.S. from becoming unduly suspicious."
  • 1 Dec. - The tanker Shiriya, which had been added to the Striking Force in an order intercepted Nov 14, radioed "proceeding to a position 30.00 N, 154.20 E. Expect to arrive at that point on 3 December." (near HI) The fact that this message is in the National Archives destroys the myth that the attack fleet maintained radio silence. "Striking Force Operations Order Number One" (SF serial # 820 dated November 19) were that all 31 ships were to use longwave radio and the Battleship Hiei was ordered to communicate with Tokyo and other fleets by shortwave. FDR apologists always lie about this order. When they have to lie to make their case, that is an admission their case is weak. Serial numbers prove that the Striking Force sent over 663 radio messages between Nov 16 and Dec 7 or about 1 per hour. The NSA has not released 25 percent of raw intercepts because the headers would prove that the Striking Force did not maintain radio silence nor have they released all Direction Finding reports for the same reason. They must be hiding this for a reason. The reason must be to deceive the public. On Nov 29 the Hiei sent one message to the Commander of the 3rd fleet; on Nov 30 the Akagi sent several messages to its tankers - see page 474 of the Hewitt Report. Stinnett in DAY OF DECEIT (p 209) found evidence of over 100 messages from the Striking Force in the National Archives. All Direction Finding reports from HI have been crudely cut out. Reports from Dec 5 show messages sent from the Striking Force picked up by Station Cast, P.I.
  • From traffic analysis, HI reported that the carrier force was at sea and in the North. THE MOST AMAZING FACT is that in reply to that report, MacArthur's command sent a series of three messages, Nov 26, 29, Dec 2, to HI lying about the location of the carrier fleet - saying it was in the South China Sea west of the Philippines. This false information, which the NSA calls inexplicable, was the true reason that HI was caught unawares. Duane Whitlock, who is still alive in Iowa, sent those messages.
  • There were a large number of other messages that gave the location of the Striking Force by alluding to the Aleutians, the North Pacific and various weather systems near HI.
  • 1 Dec. - FDR cut short his scheduled ten day vacation after 1 day to meet with Hull and Stark. The result of this meeting was reported on 2 Dec. by the Washington Post: "President Roosevelt yesterday assumed direct command of diplomatic and military moves relating to Japan." This politically damaging move was necessary to prevent the mutiny of conspirators.
  • 1 Dec. 3:30 P.M. FDR read Foreign Minister Togo's message to his ambassador to Germany: "Say very secretly to them that there is extreme danger between Japan & Anglo-Saxon nations through some clash of arms, add that the time of this war may come quicker than anyone dreams." This was in response to extreme German pressure on November 29 for Japan to strike the US and promises to join with Japan in war against the US. The second of its three parts has never been released. The message says the 2nd part contains the plan of campaign. This is 1 of only 3 known DIPLOMATIC intercepts that specified PH as target. It was so interesting, FDR kept a copy.
  • 2 Dec. 2200 Tokyo time- Here is a typical JN-25 ships-in-harbor report sent to attack fleet, words in parenthesis were in the original: "Striking Force telegram No. 994. Two battleships (Oklahoma, Nevada), 1 aircraft carrier (Enterprise) 2 heavy cruisers, 12 destroyers sailed. The force that sailed on 22 November returned to port. Ships at anchor Pearl Harbor p.m. 28 November were 6 battleships (2 Maryland class, 2 California class, 2 Pennsylvania class), 1 aircraft carrier (Lexington), 9 heavy cruisers (5 San Francisco class, 3 Chicago class, 1 Salt Lake class), 5 light cruisers (4 Honolulu class, 1 Omaha class)"
  • 2 Dec. - Commander of the Combined Imperial Fleet Yamamoto radioed the attack fleet in plain (uncoded) Japanese "Climb Niitakayama 1208" (Dec 8 Japanese time, Dec 7 our time). Thus the US knew EXACTLY when the war would start. Mount Niitaka was the highest mountain in the Japanese Empire.
  • 2 Dec. - General Hein Ter Poorten, the commander of the Netherlands East Indies Army gave the Winds setup message to the US War Department. The Australians had a center in Melbourne and the Chinese also broke JN-25. A Dutch sub had visually tracked the attack fleet to the Kurile Islands in early November and this info was passed to DC, but DC did not give it to HI. The intercepts the Dutch gave the US are still classified.
  • 2 Dec - Japanese order No. 902 specified that old JN-25 additive tables version 7 would continue to be used alongside version 8 when the latter was introduced on December 4. This means the US read all messages to the Striking Force through the attack.
  • 4 Dec. - In the early hours, Ralph Briggs at the Navy's East Coast Intercept station, received the "East Winds, Rain" message, the Winds Execute, which meant war. He put it on the TWX circuit immediately and called his commander. This message, Japanese Dispatch # 7001, was deleted from the files. One of the main coverups of Pearl Harbor was to make this message disappear because why would Roosevelt not warn Hawaii when he knew war was certain? The Winds message makes treason too easily proved. In response to the Winds Execute, the Office of US Naval IQ had all Far Eastern stations (Hawaii not informed) destroy their codes and classified documents including the Tokyo Embassy.
  • 4 Dec. - The Dutch invoked the ADB joint defense agreement when the Japanese crossed the magic line of 100 East and 10 North. The U.S. was at war with Japan 3 days before they were at war with us.
  • 4 Dec. - General Ter Poorten sent all the details of the Winds Execute command to Colonel Weijerman, the Dutch military attache' in Washington to pass on to the highest military circles. Weijerman personally gave it to Marshall, Chief of Staff of the War Department.
  • 4 Dec - US General Thorpe at Java sent four messages warning of the PH attack. DC ordered him to stop sending warnings.
  • 5 Dec. - All Japanese international shipping had returned to home port.
  • 5 Dec. - At a Cabinet meeting, Secretary of the Navy Knox said, "Well, you know Mr. President, we know where the Japanese fleet is?" "Yes, I know" said FDR. " I think we ought to tell everybody just how ticklish the situation is. We have information as Knox just mentioned...Well, you tell them what it is, Frank." Knox became very excited and said, "Well, we have very secret information that the Japanese fleet is out at sea. Our information is..." and then a scowling FDR cut him off. (Infamy, Toland, 1982, ch 14 sec 5)
  • 5 Dec. - Washington Star reporter Constantine Brown quotes a friend in his book The Coming of the Whirlwind p 291, "This is it! The Japs are ready to attack. We've broken their code, and we've read their ORDERS."
  • 6 December - This 18 November J19 message was translated by the Army:
    "1. The warships at anchor in the Harbor on the 15th were as I told you in my No.219 on that day. Area A -- A battleship of the Oklahoma class entered and one tanker left port. Area C -- 3 warships of the heavy cruiser class were at anchor.
    2. On the 17th the Saratoga was not in harbor. The carrier Enterprise, or some other vessel was in Area C. Two heavy cruisers of the Chicago class, one of the Pensacola class were tied up at docks 'KS'. 4 merchant vessels were at anchor in area D.
    3. At 10:00 A.M. on the morning of the 17th, 8 destroyers were observed entering the Harbor..." Of course this information was not passed to HI.
  • 6 Dec. - A Dec 2 request from Tokyo to HI for information about the absence of barrage balloons, anti-torpedo nets and air recon was translated by the Army.
  • 6 Dec. - at 9:30 P.M FDR read the first 13 parts of the decoded Japanese diplomatic declaration of war and said "This means war." What kind of President would do nothing? When he returned to his 34 dinner guests he said, "The war starts tomorrow."
  • 6 Dec. - the war cabinet: FDR, top advisor Hopkins, Stimson, Marshall, Secretary of the Navy Knox, with aides John McCrea and Frank Beatty "deliberately sat through the night of 6 December 1941 waiting for the Japs to strike." (Infamy ch 16 sec 2)
  • 7 December - A message from the Japanese Consul in Budapest to Tokyo:
    "On the 6th, the American Minister presented to the Government of this country a British Government communique to the effect that a state of war would break out on the 7th." The communique was the Dec 5th War Alert from the British Admiralty. It has disappeared. This triple priority alert was delivered to FDR personally Dec 5. The Mid-East British Air Marshall told Col. Bonner Fellers on Saturday that he had received a secret signal that America was coming into the war in 24 hours. Churchill summarized the message in GRAND ALLIANCE page 601 as listing the two fleets attacking British targets and "Other Japanese fleets...also at sea on other tasks." There only were three other fleets- for Guam, the Philippines and HI. 2 paragraphs of the alert, British targets only, are printed in At Dawn We Slept, Prange, p 464. There is no innocent purpose for our government to hide this document.
  • 7 December 1941 very early Washington time, there were two Marines, an emergency special detail, stationed outside the Japanese Naval Attache's door. 9:30 AM Aides begged Stark to send a warning to Hawaii. He did not. 10 AM FDR read the 14th part of the Declaration of War, 11 A.M. FDR read the accompanying 15th part setting the time for the declaration of war to be delivered to the State Department at 1 PM, about dawn Pearl Harbor time, and did nothing. Navy Secretary Knox was given the 15th part at 11:15 A.M. with this note from the Office of Naval IQ: "This means a sunrise attack on Pearl Harbor today." Naval IQ also transmitted this prediction to Hull and about 8 others, including the White House (PHH 36:532). At 10:30 AM Bratton informed Marshall that he had a most important message (the 15th part) and would bring it to Marshall's quarters but Marshall said he would take it at his office. At 11:25 Marshall reached his office according to Bratton. Marshall testified that he had been riding horses that morning but he was contradicted by Harrison, McCollum, and Deane. Marshall who had read the first 13 parts by 10 PM the prior night, later perjured himself by denying that he had even received them. Marshall, in the face of his aides' urgent supplications that he warn Hawaii, made strange delays including reading and re-reading all of the 10 minute long 14 Part Message (and some parts several times) which took an hour and refused to use the scrambler phone on his desk, refused to send a warning by the fast, more secure Navy system but sent Bratton three times to inquire how long it would take to send his watered down warning - when informed it would take 30 or 40 minutes by Army radio, he was satisfied (that meant he had delayed enough so the warning wouldn't reach Pearl Harbor until after the 1 PM Washington time deadline). The warning was in fact sent commercial without priority identification and arrived 6 hours late. This message reached all other addressees, like the Philippines and Canal Zone, in a timely manner.
  • 7 December - 7:55 A.M. Hawaii time AIR RAID PEARL HARBOR. THIS IS NOT DRILL.
  • 7 December - 1:50 P.M. Washington time. Harry Hopkins, who was the only person with FDR when he received the news of the attack by telephone from Knox, wrote that FDR was unsurprised and expressed "great relief." Eleanor Roosevelt wrote about December 7th in This I Remember p 233, that FDR became "in a way more serene." In the NY Times Magazine of October 8, 1944 she wrote: "December 7 was...far from the shock it proved to the country in general. We had expected something of the sort for a long time."
  • 7 December - 3:00 PM "The (war cabinet) conference met in not too tense an atmosphere because I think that all of us believed that in the last analysis the enemy was Hitler...and that Japan had given us an opportunity." Harry Hopkins (top KGB agent and FDR's alter ego), Dec. 7 Memo (Roosevelt and Hopkins R Sherwood, p. 431)
  • 7 December - 9 hours later, MacArthur's entire air force was caught by surprise and wiped out in the Philippines. His reaction to the news of Pearl Harbor was quite unusual - he locked himself in his room all morning and refused to meet with his air commander General Brereton, and refused to attack Japanese forces on Formosa even under orders from the War Department. MacArthur gave three conflicting orders that ensured the planes were on the ground most of the morning. MacArthur used radar tracking of the Japanese planes at 140, 100, 80, 60, down to 20 miles to time his final order and ensure his planes were on the ground. Strategically, the destruction of half of all US heavy bombers in the world was more important than naval damage in Pearl Harbor. Either MacArthur had committed the greatest blunder in military history or he was under orders to allow his forces to be destroyed. If it were the greatest blunder in history, it is remarkable how he escaped any reprimand, kept his command and got his fourth star and Congressional Medal of Honor shortly later. Prange argued, "How could the President ensure a successful Japanese attack unless he confided in the commanders and persuaded them to allow the enemy to proceed unhindered?"
  • 7 December - 8:30 PM, FDR said to his cabinet, "We have reason to believe that the Germans have told the Japanese that if Japan declares war, they will too. In other words, a declaration of war by Japan automatically brings..." at which point he was interrupted, but his expectation and focus is clear. Mrs. Frances Perkins, Secretary of Labor, observed later about FDR: "I had a deep emotional feeling that something was wrong, that this situation was not all it appeared to be." Mrs. Perkins was obsessed by Roosevelt's strange reactions that night and remarked particularly on the expression he had:" In other words, there have been times when I associated that expression with a kind of evasiveness."
  • FDR met with CBS newsman Edward R. Murrow at midnight. Murrow, who had seen many statesmen in crises, was surprised at FDR's calm reaction. After chatting about London, they reviewed the latest news from PH and then FDR tested Murrow's news instincts with these 2 bizarre giveaway questions: "Did this surprise you?" Murrow said yes. FDR: "Maybe you think it didn't surprise us?" FDR gave the impression that the attack itself was not unwelcome. This is the same high-strung FDR that got polio when convicted of perjury; the same FDR that was bedridden for a month when he learned Russia was to be attacked; the same FDR who couldn't eat or drink when he got the Japanese order to sail.
  • 8 December - In a conversation with his speech writer Rosenman, FDR "emphasized that Hitler was still the first target, but he feared that a great many Americans would insist that we make the war in the Pacific at least equally important with the war against Hitler."
  • Later, Jonathan Daniels, administrative assistant and press secretary to FDR said, "The blow was heavier than he had hoped it would necessarily be...But the risks paid off; even the loss was worth the price..."
  • FDR reminisced with Stalin at Tehran on November 30, 1943, saying "if the Japanese had not attacked the US he doubted very much if it would have been possible to send any American forces to Europe." Compare this statement with what FDR said at the Atlantic Conference 4 months before Pearl: "Everything was to be done to force an 'incident' to justify hostilities." Given that a Japanese attack was the only possible incident, then FDR had promised he would do it.

Information Known in Washington and Hawaii

October 9-December 7, 1941


COMMISSIONS AND COVERUP

Two and only two courts of law have decided the issue of whether FDR and Washington or the commanders in Hawaii were responsible for the Pearl Harbor disaster. Both the Navy Court and the Army Board found Washington guilty. It is the official position of the US Government and its courts that the conspiracy is true. Courts determine ultimate truth.
NAVY Court of Inquiry
!!!Top Secret ARMY Board Report!!! (30K), Oct, 1944, "Now let us turn to the fateful period between November 27 and December 6, 1941. In this period numerous pieces of information came to our State, War, and Navy Departments in all of their Top ranks indicating precisely the intentions of the Japanese including the probable exact hour and date of the attack. " In response to this report, Marshall offered his resignation - the sign of a guilty conscience. Marshall testified at the MacArthur hearings that he considered loyalty to his chief superior to loyalty to his country.
JOINT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack, Nov 15, 1945 to May 31, 1946, proved that there had been so much reversion of testimony, coverup and outright lies that the truth would have to wait until all Pearl Harbor records were declassified.
Most of the conspirators were military men, all men of FDR's own choice, men who only followed orders and FDR never delegated authority. Stark, in answer to charges that he denied IQ to Hawaii, publicly offered a Nuremberg defense in August 1945 that everything he did pre-Dec 7, 1941 was on FDR's orders. The handful of military men in DC responsible for the disaster at Pearl Harbor were directly under the control of FDR and were later promoted and protected from investigation; promoted with FDR's full knowledge that they were responsible for not warning Hawaii. On the record, Intelligence tried to warn HI scores of times but were prevented by FDR's men.
Mahalo: Vance...what a goddamned circusII
check this out, this dude just sent me thisFrom: Skews MeI've long had this file I compiled a decade ago on one of my yahoo news groups, but I just now uploaded a copy to my website. If I can find time, I'll convert it to html.http://www. skewsme. com/Bainbridge_WWII. docI grew up on Bainbridge Island, right across from Seattle where I now live.
Bainbridge Island Naval Radio Station5/14/1998 by SkewsMe. comWhen Tokyo talked, Bainbridge Naval Radio Station listened.-- ‘East Wind Rain’; Bainbridge’s day in history: Dec 7, 1941, Seattle Post Intelligencer, 7 Dec 1971, 108(341).A vital link in the Navy’s communication system in the Pacific, [the Battle Point Naval Radio Station was] declared surplus by the Department of Defense and turned over to the General Services Administration. The 800 foot high steel transmitter tower,…some 200 feet taller than the Space Needle, reputedly once was the tallest tower in the world. The station is said to be the first point in the continental United States to receive word of the attack on Pearl Harbor. It intercepted coded Japanese radio messages during World War II.-- Charles Aweeka, 800 foot Bainbridge tower due to go down into history, The Seattle Times, 23 April 1972.At 1:28 a.m. Dec. 7, 1941,…a Navy radio man stationed at the southern tip of Bainbridge Island near Seattle intercepted a final message from Tokyo to Japan’s ambassador in Washington, D.C. The message told the ambassador to state Japan’s final position to the U.S. by 1 p.m. Washington time. One p.m. Washington time was 7:30 a.m. at Pearl Harbor. So Bainbridge Naval Radio Station plucked from the air waves…the timetable, if not the target, for Japan’s attack.The island…housed one of the most effective and least known…spy operations of World War II.On Nov. 19, 1941, Bainbridge intercepted Japan’s plans for the famous “winds” code in which a weather forecast would signal the end of diplomatic relations. [From] “Building eleven” at Bainbridge,…the contents of those…dispatches…[were then] forwarded…to Washington by teletype for decoding.The very existence of such a place as Building Eleven, a two story brick structure housing an operation called “security group” or “supplementary radio,” was and remains one of the best kept secrets of the war.Some of Bainbridge’s undercover role was revealed by the Navy in 1946 during Congressional investigation of Pearl Harbor events. There is no apparent reason for secrecy today.Secrecy haunts the veterans of “Station S,” the code name for Bainbridge. Over on Bainbridge,…people still say things like “loose lips sink ships.”The Naval Radio Station was built in 1939 on the abandoned site of Fort Ward, an Army facility. The station handled communications for the 13th Naval District, broadcasting on a 50,000 watt transmitter. Station S was control center for a Pacific Coast network of radio direction finder (RDF) stations used to track both friendly and hostile craft. Bainbridge copied all of the Japanese government messages between Tokyo and San Francisco, and guarded the radiotelephone band of the same circuit for voice transmissions.It was Bainbridge’s secret assignment, as much as the nearness of the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard at Bremerton, that led to the sudden evacuation of 225 Japanese Americans from Bainbridge on March 30, 1942. It was the first forced evacuation of its kind on the West Coast. Few knew at the time of the evacuation that the Navy on Oct. 27, 1941, translated messages sent by a Japanese agent “Sato” from Seattle to Tokyo, describing warship repairs at Bremerton.[Some] operators at Bainbridge Dec. 6 and 7 were diverted to a strange new assignment –…somebody in Washington wanted badly to know about the wind direction. In case Japan U.S. relations were in danger, the code words would be…“east wind rain.” For Russia,…the signal was “north wind cloudy.” For Great Britain, the words were “west wind clear.” (Navy Commander Laurence F. Safford later insisted in the face of official denials that the U.S. had received all three wind code signals on Dec. 4 or 5. Japanese agents in Hawaii said they did not hear the “east wind rain” signal broadcast until two hours after Pearl Harbor was attacked.)The message setting a 1 p.m. timetable to break off talks war completely intercepted at Bainbridge by 1:37 a.m. Relayed to Washington by teletype, the code was instantly recognized as “purple,” Japan’s toughest crytographic system. At 11:30 a.m., the message was in the hands of General George C. Marshall, Army chief of staff. At the same moment the Japanese Zeros were tearing through the sky 200 miles north of Pearl Harbor. Marshall’s last minute alert message, warning of the Japanese ultimatum due at 7:30 Hawaii time, reached Honolulu at 7:33 a.m., and even then was not immediately delivered to military commanders.In Building Eleven, Station S, Bainbridge Island, the diplomatic circuits were still, as if dead. But there was noise, lots of it, from the Japanese Navy. In the sky over Pearl Harbor, Cmdr. Mitsuo Fuchida looked down from his high level bomber, saw that complete surprise had been achieved, and radioed the words “Tora, tora, tora.”Years later, when the tide of war had turned…a signal from a Japanese radio man in the Kurile Islands …stopped, and suddenly, in plain language, he was sending the words: “They’re coming, they’re coming they’re coming.”-- Walter Wright, Building 11 and the fateful Japanese message, Seattle Post Intelligencer, 7 Dec 1971, 108(341), p. A17.I've long had this file I compiled a decade ago on one of my yahoo news groups, but I just now uploaded a copy to my website. If I can find time, I'll convert it to html.http://www. skewsme. com/Bainbridge_WWII. docI grew up on Bainbridge Island, right across from Seattle where I now live.

FYI; Interesting and just posted on one of my other list. I was surprised they even took the time to post their findings. Do you suppose they are only now realizing or acknowledging the truth? Or perhaps they know more about whats going to happen which is why they chose to reveal this now. Lawe
l_9e33729f40575b08e60d2dff24161148.gifnwo.gif

Read more…