All Posts (6512)

Sort by
We just received notice of this great event on campus:---------------------------------------------From the UHM Global Health and Population Studies Program:We have set up a jam-packed week's worth of events for National Public Health Week April 6th-9th, with the cross-cutting theme of health and human rights. The six main tracks of the symposium are* "Native Hawaiian and Indigenous Health"* "Food Security and Nutrition"* "Violence"* "Refugee, immigrant and in-migrant health"* "Achieving universal access to health care"* "The Future of Public Health Emergencies"This free, week-long series of interactive events focuses on core areas in global health with a human rights perspective, including Native Hawaiian and indigenous health, forced migrant health, structural and domestic violence, and food security and nutrition. Our illustrious speakers include the former Director of Global Health at USAID Frederick 'Skip' Burkle, Kekuni Blaisdell, George Kent, Jon Van Dyke, Cindy Spencer and many others. Events include lectures, workshops, socials with free food and drinks, an "NGO-Off" where dozens of organizations present their work in 5 minutes a piece and documentary showings. Please see the attached fliers.Monday, April 6th:A free public health mixer with food and drinks at Dave and Buster's from 5 to 7 pm. RSVP to hpha@hawaii.rr.com. Meet and mingle with the speakers and facilitators from the symposium in a relaxed, fun atmosphere. All are welcome!Tuesday, April 7th:The interactive Symposium on Health and Human Rights will be held from 4:00 to 8:30 p.m. in Biomed B103 at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa. The 4 main themes will be Native Hawaiian and Indigenous Health, Food Security and Nutrition, Refugee/Immigrant/In-migrant health, and Violence. The symposium will be filmed by award winning documentary writer/director/producer Danny Miller.1. Four keynote speakers will speak from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. about the main themes, including noted human rights author and professor Dr. George Kent, the Domestic Violence Action Center’s Cindy Spencer, Dr. Kekuni Blaisdell and Professor Jon Van Dyke.2. The “NGO-Off!” (Non-Governmental Organization) - From 6:00 to 7:00 p.m., 12 representatives from local and international organizations will talk about their programs, all of which are active in human rights issues related to public health in Hawaii and internationally, and how audience members can get involved. Each organization will have 5 minutes to make their case and will be escorted off stage if they go over time. The atmosphere will be fast-paced, informal and fun. Organizations include the Peace Corps, the Immigrant Justice Center, the Spark Matsunaga Institute for Peace, the Hawaii Institute for Human Rights, Friends of Samoa, Amnesty International, the UN Association of Hawaii, Ma'o Farms and many others. Refreshments will be provided.3. Interactive breakout workshops – A large spread of food from Kristy’s Kitchen will be served, and participants will break down into 4 interactive workgroups based around the main themes in Biomed D207, T208, T211 and C104 to eat and brainstorm opportunities for continuing action. Each group will have 2 facilitators, and will focus on at least one collective local and international action to improve health through a rights-based approach. Our accomplished facilitators include Kawika Liu, Jody Leslie, Nancy Partika, Friends of Samoa, Jennifer Rose, Joshua Cooper, John Robert Egan and Nicole Littenberg.Wednesday, April 8th:Reverend Jory Watland, former Director and co-founder of Kokua Kalihi Valley, will talk about the need for universal access to comprehensive health care in Hawaii and the United States at 5:30 p.m. Following his talk, 2 documentaries (Sick Around the World, Together We Are Stong) will be shown. Large quantities of popcorn will be distributed to all.Thursday, April 9th:Harvard Humanitarian Scholar, former Director of Global Health at USAID and Woodrow Wilson Senior International Fellow Dr. Frederick ‘Skip’ Burkle will deliver the closing speech, wrapping up the underlying conference themes and looking toward the future. Following the closing talk, 2 documentaries will be shown: Seeds of Hope and Unnatural Causes.--------------------------------------In addition to the 20 cosponsors, 12 presenting groups, 8 facilitators and 6 keynote speakers, approximately 10 organizations with mandates related to health and human rights will have tables in B court. Parking refunds will be provided to the first 60 community members and invited organizations to arrive on Tuesday. RSVP to kcoontz@hawaii.edu.Kristopher M CoontzProgram AdministratorGlobal Health and Population Studies ProgramOffice of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa
Read more…

US cant make up their stupid minds

Aloha,You know how the US made a paper saying that us kanaks could keep the Ceded Lands because their belonged to us and that they didn't want the Ceded Lands, but now the US wants to take the Ceded Lands and give it to the state to sell it...'A'ole, hello that is our land. We protected it, we took care of it, so don't we deserve to have the land for us as a people of these islands that was so called "FOUND" by James Cook and illegally taken by the US and i know that the British also took us over, but at least they gave us back after three years because we were taken illegally. I just want to know why the US didn't show the same respect and let us go? Is it because their so selfish and they want to get so far ahead from everybody else that don't care what beautiful places and people they are destroying in the process.I still consider us kanaks as a kingdom and i don't care what the "invasive species" saying we are. I want to tear that US flag down from I'olani Palace and just let our Hawaiian Flag sway in the wind at the highest point of our palace with pride because there is no shame in being Kanaka Maoli.I'm very proud to be Hawaiian because as i learn more about what the US did and is still doing to Hawaii, it just gives me a better reason the be all i can be and help us as kanaka back to the top...We are smarter than the US will ever be. Be proud to come from these 8 beautiful islands.We will get back up there like we used to be, all we have to do is fight.
Read more…

DESTINATION IRAQ: KANEOHE MARINES DEPART

FROM ONE ILLEGALLY OCCUPIED NATION TO THE OTHER , LOOKS LIKE A PATTERN TO ME! LIKE COLONIALISM ?nwoTools.jpg

DESTINATION IRAQ: KANEOHE MARINES DEPART

150 Kaneohe Marines leave for Iraq

Soldiers hope to build on existing peace

STORY SUMMARY | READ THE FULL STORY

Kaneohe Marines who have deployed more than once to Iraq say the country is now far more peaceful and amenable to community building projects.

"I'm hoping to do a lot of good things over there as far as helping the community, rebuilding schools, shopping centers, things like that," said Lance Cpl. Richard Johnson.

Johnson was part of a contingent of 150 Marines that left Kaneohe yesterday for a seven-month deployment to al Asad, Iraq. They are members of the 3rd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, which is replacing Kaneohe's 1st Battalion, 12th Regiment, now in Iraq.

The returning battalion is scheduled to go back to Iraq in November even as President Barack Obama has ordered a drawdown in U.S. forces.

— Star-Bulletin staff

blockedLine_onWhite.gif

FULL STORY >>

By Star-Bulletin staff

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Apr 06, 2009

Lance Cpl. Richard Johnson was supposed to get out of the Marine Corps last December.


[Preview] An Emotional Goodbye For Local Soldiers
[Preview]

About 150 Marines and Sailors boarded a bus as they leave loved ones behind for a 7-month deployment to Iraq.

But he extended his active-duty enlistment for a year when he learned his unit was returning to Iraq this month.

"I wanted to go back with these guys. They're a very good unit. I wanted to go back to Iraq and do good things," he said.

Johnson is among the last 150 Marines and sailors with 3rd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, to depart from Kaneohe yesterday for a seven-month deployment to al Asad, Iraq. About 850 other Marines and sailors of the 3rd Battalion left earlier this month.

This is Johnson's third deployment to Iraq since 2006. He said there were a lot of close combat encounters, improvised explosive device (IED) strikes, sniper shots and small-arms fire in his first deployment.

His second deployment in 2007 was more peaceful, with far fewer insurgent attacks.

Johnson is hoping for more of the same for his third deployment.

"I'm hoping to do a lot of good things over there as far as helping the community, rebuilding schools, shopping centers, things like that," he said.

And he's happy President Barack Obama plans to draw down the number of troops in Iraq by the summer of 2010.

Obama said he would like to withdraw two-thirds of the 145,000 U.S. troops now in Iraq.

"I think we did everything that we could (in Iraq). And we have a lot of priorities in Afghanistan right now," Johnson said.

The 3rd Battalion, 3rd Regiment, is replacing Kaneohe's 1st Battalion, 12th Marine Regiment, now in Iraq. The 1st Battalion is scheduled to go back to Iraq in November.

Staff Sgt. Felix Nole-Ortiz is another one of the 150 to depart Kaneohe yesterday. This will be his fourth deployment to Iraq since 1992. His first time was as part of Operation Desert Storm, the campaign to liberate Kuwait, during which some U.S. units crossed the border into Iraq, then withdrew.

He says he has seen living conditions improve for some Iraqis during his three previous deployments.

"Some of the areas are built up, some of the areas not. Some of the people are living a lot better than others," he said.

Nole-Ortiz says if the Iraqis can handle their own security, he supports the drawdown. If he is ordered to go to Iraq after next summer, he says he will do his job.

He says the only difficulty with his deployments is being away from his family. He and his wife have two sons, ages 8 and 13, and are expecting another child in June.

Nole-Ortiz says the military services have greatly improved communication opportunities between service members deployed overseas with their families back home.

"But I still write letters the old-fashioned way," he said.

And this time, Nole-Ortiz says he is bringing a laptop computer.

http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090406_150_Kaneohe_Marines_leave_for_Iraq.html
Read more…

Choosing a form of governance:

Choosing a form of governance:

We should remember that we elected TWO monarchs in the past. There are rules and criteria for eligibility as dictated in the constitution. The other point is many have connections to ali'i lineage and that the DNA has broadened to many. The other thing is that the ali'i abandoned their post for almost a hundred years and the maka'ainana and ali'i descendants have been able to live without them and shifted for themselves the best way they know how.

The dynamics of 2009 has changed the complexion of governance and therefore it should be up to the Hawai'i nationals to decide what form of government they wish to live under. It doesn't have to be forms that exist today but a variation that is suitable for our island kingdom/nation/state. It should fit our composition of culture, modern day economics, sustenance and pursuit of happiness, and protection of our people's human rights. Nothing is etched in stone and we can allow ourselves to make mistakes while improving our Polynesian society and lifestyle.
Once we establish our system of governance, if it isn't workable, we can change it. What people need to look at is what is going on throughout the world; what is working and what is not; the pitfalls that wrest the governance away from the people; and the safeguards to protect itself and its people.

The people themselves should don the kuleana for their country and make itself accountable for its citizens and listen to the voices of its people. The people have the kuleana to make things happen as an active member of society. You snooze; you lose. One has to take a stand and one has to listen. Trust needs to be earned and a person's word is their honor. That is what we learned while growing up and we need to put it into practice if we haven't already.

Playing games with your own mercurial rules does not do it. Kulia i ka nu'u; strive for the best.

Tane

Read more…
There’s plenty of opinions to go around regarding the recent US Supreme Court decision in the Hawaiian Kingdom’s stolen lands case.Yet most have ignored two important aspects of the decision.What are they and why did the court issue an opinion so fast in this case?Find out these answers and a whole lot more this coming Wednesday on Free Hawai`i TV.Mahalo to all once again for letting us know how much you enjoy our new show with Kaua`i’s Hale Mawae.Hale is one of our finest young activists. In serving his culture, he sets the kind of example to inspire all of us into action. If you haven’t seen him yet, here’s your chance this week on Voices Of Truth – One-On-One With Hawai`i's Future.MONDAY, April 6th At 6:30 PM Maui – Akaku, Channel 53MONDAY, April 6th At 7:00 PM & FRIDAY, April 10th At 5:30 PM Hawai`i Island – Na Leo, Channel 53SATURDAY, April 11th At 8:00 PM O`ahu, `Olelo, Channel 53“I Serve My Culture – A Visit With Hale Mawae”Being a child on the front lines of the Hawaiian sovereignty movement was not always easy. Yet Hale tells us it’s what made him what he is today – a servant of both his culture and his people. Sharing vivid memories and stories, you’re sure to be inspired by one of Kaua`i’s most eloquent and multi-talented young activists. And his message is one you won’t soon forget. Watch It Here.THURSDAY, April 9th At 8:30 PM & FRIDAY, April 10th At 8:30 AM - Kaua`i – Ho`ike, Channel 52"Hawai`i The Fake State - A Visit With Leon Siu"The history books are wrong. Hawai`i is not part of the US according to Leon Siu, who reveals why more people every day are awakening to realize one simple fact – Hawai`i's annexation to the US and subsequent statehood vote were both fake. How can this be? The truth is out there. Watch It Here.Voices Of Truth interviews those creating a better future for Hawai`i to discover what made them go from armchair observers to active participants. We hope you'll be inspired to do the same.If you support our issues on the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network, please email this to a friend to help us continue. A donation today helps further our work. Every single penny counts.Donating is easy on our Voices Of Truth website via PayPal where you can watch Voices Of Truth anytime.And for news and issues that affect you, watch Free Hawai`i TV, a part of the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network.
Read more…

HPACH Testimony On Iolani Palace

April 6, 2009Representative Joey Manahan, ChairRepresentative James Kunane Tokioka, Vice ChairAnd Committee Members On Tourism, Culture & International AffairsHouse of Representatives, 2009 Legislature SessionState of HawaiiSubject: HCR 225, HD1/ HR 193, HD1, Urging The United StatesDepartment Of the Interior To Place Iolani Palace On the NominationList To The United Nations Educational Scientific And CulturalOrganization For World Heritage Site Designation, OPPOSEALOHA Kakou,My name is Richard Pomaikaiokalani Kinney. On January 17, 1993 after reading Public Law 103-150 I renounced my citizenship to the United States. I come here today as a Hawaiian National of the Hawaiian Kingdom. I strongly support the restoration of the Hawaiian Kingdom government that was invaded and occupied thru an Act of War onJanuary 16, 1893 with the involvement of the diplomatic and military forces of the United States.As Sovereign of the Hawaiian Political Action Council of Hawaii, I OPPOSE the intent and passage of HCR 225, HD1 and HR 193, HD1.Presently the Friends of Iolani Palace has enacted rules that violate the access to the ground of Iolani Palace by I and many Kanaka Maoli Hawaii, the Indigenous Hawaiian people of Hawaii. These rules were signed by Governor Lingle.On January 18, 2009 I and my fellow Kanaka Maoli Hawaii and guest from the general public gathered at the Ahu on the ground of Iolani Palace. I like many of my Kanaka Maoli Hawaii have gathered on the grounds of Iolani Palace for the past 20 more years.We gathered on the grounds of Iolani Palace on January 18, as in the past unarmed of any type of military or other types of armed weapons. As I and my fellow Kanaka Maoli Hawaii believe and support the peaceful restoration of the Hawaiian Kingdom.On January 18 the Friends of Iolani Palace had informed the DLNR Security that Kanaka Maoli Hawaii were going to hold a demonstration atPage 2April 6, 2009HCR 225, HD1HR 193 HD 1Iolani Palace. This was reported in the news papers.When I and my fellow Kanaka Maoli Hawaii arrived at the Ahu atIolani Palace already there were many DLNR Security guards armed with weapons there in place.We were informed that we were in violation of the rules of Iolani Palace. After setting up three canopies my civil rights and those of my fellow Kanaka Maoli Hawaii were violated. As three canopies were confiscated by the DLNR Security guards. One of the three canopies that was confiscated was used as a coverage over the food tables. Food,Na Mae ‘Ai that has been always provided to be enjoyed by my self, my fellow Kanaka Maoli Hawaii and the guest from the general public that always joined us on Sovereign Sundays. It is the culture my ancestors to share Na Mae ‘Ai always as a blessing.The actions of the Friends of Iolani Palace that lead to the confiscating of the canopies and the disrupting of our gathering on Sunday January 18, 2009 at the Ahu at Iolani Palace has caused a lot of pain. Pain for me that has not gone away. Pain that has grown deep into the sole of I being a Hawaiian National of the Hawaiian Kingdom.King Kalakaua built Iolani Palace for his Kanaka Maoli Hawaii people as the residence of their Sovereigns of their nation, the Hawaiian Kingdom. A Royal residence for the Kanaka Maoli Hawaii people to uplift their Kingdom into the new world.It is for these reasons, I Strongly OPPOSE the passage of HCR 225, HD1 and HR 193, HD1.Attachments: Renouncement DocumentsALOHA KUU AINA HAWAIIRichard Pomaikaiokalani Kinney, SOVEREIGNHawaiian Political Action Council of Hawaii87-168 Maaloa Street, Waianae, Hawaii, 96792
Read more…
Let's pretend I visit your house. You offer me food and rest. I decide to stay. Then, I order you and your family around, use your things and rearrange the rooms. I take down your photos and religious symbols, replace them with my own and make you speak my language.One day, I dig up your garden and replace it with crops that I can sell. You and your family must now buy all of your food from me.Later, I invite my father and his buddies over. They bring guns. We take your keys. I forge a deed and declare my father to be the owner of your house. I bring more people. Some work for me. Some pay me to stay in your house. I seize your savings and spend it on my friends. You and your family now sleep on the porch.Finally you protest. Being reasonable, I let you stay in a corner of the house and give you a small allowance, but only if you behave. I tell you, "Sorry, I was wrong for taking the house." But when you demand your house back, I tell you to be realistic."You are part of this family now, whether you like it or not," I say. "Besides, this is for your own good. For all that I have done for you, why aren't you grateful?"
Read more…

Navy to clean up waste in Wahiawa, Wai'anae

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

April 3, 2009

Navy to clean up waste in Wahiawa, Wai'anae

Military installations on EPA's 'Superfund' list pose no immediate threat

By Gordon Y.K. Pang
Advertiser Staff Writer

The Navy this week signed off on an agreement to clean up hazardous waste sites on active military installations in Lualualei in Wai'anae and near Whitmore Village in Wahiawa.

Officials with the Navy and the federal Environmental Protection Agency, however, said that the agreement is largely a formality for the two locations that are on the EPA's National Priorities List, also known as the "Superfund" list.

"Preliminary investigations have indicated that no immediate threats currently exist at the sites while further investigations continue," the EPA said yesterday in a release.

Navy spokeswoman Denise Emsley said actual cleanup work began in 1991 for the sites even before the EPA put them on the Superfund list in 1994.

Both the Naval Computer and Telecommunications Area Master Station for the Pacific in Wahiawa and the Navy Radio Transmitter Facility in Lualualei continue to operate as active military installations.

Technically, 24 "sites" have been designated — 11 in Lualualei and 13 in Wahiawa.

Cleanup at five of the sites are completed, Emsley said. Most of the work already done involves the soil at former PCB transformers that the Navy deemed a priority, she said.

According to the EPA's Web site on the cleanup effort, soil from those sites was excavated and transported to a thermal desorption treatment facility at the former Naval Air Station Barbers Point. Once cleaned, the soil was returned to the excavated sites and used as backfill.

"The Navy manages its various sites to be cleaned up by dealing with those of highest concern first," those that pose the most risk to people or the environment, Emsley said.

According to the EPA, PCBs can cause cancer in animals and adversely affect the nervous, immune and endocrine systems in people.

Among the sites yet to be cleared at the Wahiawa location are a landfill, an incinerator, several disposal sites, a "service station gulch," a dump site and an abandoned firing range.

Included among the sites yet to be cleaned at Lualualei are a landfill, an old coral pit, several disposal areas, two wells and sewage ponds.

"This is a critical step in completing the cleanup actions," said Keith Takata, director for the EPA Pacific Southwest Region's Superfund Division. "Our agreement with the Navy and the state finalizes the process that the Navy will follow to complete the investigation and cleanup of any remaining chemical contamination at both sites."

Last summer, the Department of Defense publicly raised issue with the EPA's demand that it clean 11 hazardous locations across the country, including the Wahiawa location.

Both Emsley and local EPA spokesman Dean Higuchi said they did not know the reason for the Department of Defense's objections to cleaning the Hawai'i location.

Emsley said the Navy has had a cooperative relationship with the local EPA office and the state Department of Health throughout the cleanup process.

The Navy has spent approximately $250 million to date cleaning restoration sites throughout O'ahu, including at the Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, Emsley said.

Read more…
New York Times - March 21, 2009We’re going to have to go out and find other employment for Alakai,” said the president of Hawai`i Superferry, Thomas B. Fargo, a retired Navy admiral who once commanded American forces in the Pacific. “Certainly the military may very well want to lease this particular ship....”A shipbuilding analyst in Florida, Tim Colton, said the company’s owner and chairman, John F. Lehman, a former Navy secretary, was well positioned to lease the Alakai and a just-finished sister ship to the Navy....State Representative Hermina M. Morita, a Democrat and chairwoman of the Committee on Energy and Environmental Protection, said she never thought either ferry would be profitable.“You look at the players involved,” Ms. Morita said. “You have to question their motives....”Read The Rest Here
Read more…
Aloha Gang,After reading all the postings and being reminded of Malcolm X's wisdom I thought it might be good to share more of his mana'o. Funny how his comments were made over 40 years ago and yet they still apply so directly to our present struggles. So much has changed, but not much has improved.On democracy, legislating equality and freedom and the system (Just try replacing the term "black man" with kanaka):"“The black man in this country is supposed to be getting freedom. The country is supposed to be based on that. Democracy, freedom, justice equality all the all that stuff that they teach us in school. And now, why should the black have to go to court to get freedom when the white man of this country has freedom when he is born? Why should the black man need some legislation to prove that he is a human being when you don’t need any legislation to prove that whites are human beings? So, I make this point because, to come right back to my initial statement that I made at the outstart of this program, you will never get real freedom and recognition between black and white people In this country without destroying the country, without destroying the present political system, without destroying the present economic system, without re-writing the entire constitution. It’ll be a complete destruction of everything that America supposedly stands for before a white man in this country will recognize a black man as something on the same level with himself. And this is why the honorable Elijah muhammed teaches us that the best way to solve the problem is complete separation."Going back to previous emails about having too much faith in the legal arena and needing to maintain active resistance by the masses Malcolm X shares this bit of wisdom:"The white power structure [Amerikkka] today is just as interested in slavery. And realizing that the black people [kanaka] of this country are waking up and becoming filled with the desire to be looked upon as men and as human beings, the white power structure to slow down that struggle for freedom and human dignity uses tricks. A hundred years ago they could do it with chains. Today they use tricks. One of the tricks that they have invented is this token integration. To give the so called negro leaders to accept the few token crumbs of integration [the Akaka bill] that don’t solve the any problems for the masses of black people in this country whatsoever but it does make the hand picked negroes [OHA, etc.] to be satisfied to slow down the cry of the masses and a good example of that is as soon as the spirit of rebellion or revolution begins to spread among the masses of black people in this country [Kalama valley, Kahoolawe, Waimanalo, Sand Island, Makua, Waiahole, Waokele o Puna, Palace arrests, etc.] , and they begin to take an active part; and they show that they werent confined to this non-violent approach, then the government or the power structure begins to sit up and take notice. And now the President (Kennedy) is talking about new legislation and take it out of the streets and put it back into the courts.[Ceded lands case, Akaka bill] Well as long as its in the streets, its in the hands of the masses of black people who will not compromise and who cannot be bought out. But when you put it back into the courts then that puts it back into the hands of the hand picked negro leaders who will allow the judges and other persons that are involved in this white power structure to slow them down.[consider OHA's position in the Ceded lands case when they conceded their position and said that Hawaiians had no title to the lands] Its only a trick. And as long as the masses of black people are involved in the struggle for freedom, not integration, but freedom, the respect as human beings, the respect as men and show that they are willing to die to be respected as men, then the power structure sits up and takes notice. But as long as that mass element is “led” … actually contained by uncle Tom negro leaders who hold them back; who tell them to turn the other cheek and things like that then the white power structure is not worried about them at all. They’re only worried when they know that the masses of black people are ready to explode. And in exploding, it will destroy some of the furniture in their house. And then they react accordingly."Source - taken from a speech on YouTube: Debate with James Farmer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyyFGOAwTYM&NR=1)And so it goes.Peace,Kekailoa.
Read more…
OPPOSITION TO SCR3 (HCR22, HR24, SR6, and SCR42) - REQUESTING CONGRESS TO DESIGNATE THE HAWAII CAPITAL CULTURAL DISTRICT AS A NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAThere are those of us who think that this is actually worse than the Akaka Bill because unlike the Akaka Bill...this "federalization" can with the stroke of a pen... in essence do that same thing that the AB would do...but much faster and with less complications, which is why we believe they are doing it. Hiding behind "economic" revitalization in these rough economic times....Our action at the palace where we had tents confiscated...would look like a day in the park. We already witnessed the tazers, bullet proof vests, and over reaction to our simple ceremonies as evidence of the escalation of their intimindation since the new rules. You can imagine if it was under the feds...how much worse it would get.We can have testimony ready for you to just sign, or you can just say whatever moves you...like I did today. I hate writing testimony, but I don't mind speaking. We need to let Lingle/Theilen know that they cannot push us around.Subject: OPPOSITION TO SCR3 (HCR22, HR24, SR6, and SCR42) - REQUESTING CONGRESS TO DESIGNATE THE HAWAII CAPITAL CULTURAL DISTRICT AS A NATIONAL HERITAGE AREATo:Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 9:45 PMAloha mai ~HR183 and HCR213 was passed out of HAW unamended today (good news), but the fight continues, as there are numerous pieces of legislation moving through both the State House and Senate. HR183 and HCR213 called for HAWAII'S CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO WITHDRAW ITS SUPPORT OF THE HAWAII CAPITAL NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.HCR22, HR24, SCR3, SR6, and SCR42 is legislation currently in the State Senate and House that pertain to the establishment and support of a National Heritage Area (inclusive of Mauna Ala, Iolani Palace, Nuuanu Pali, Puowaina - Papakolea - essentially everything and anything within the Honolulu Ahupuaa and Kapalama Ahupuaa - mountain to sea). These Resolutions need to be OPPOSED, as they support the designation of a National Heritage Area (Federal Legislation S.359 and H.R. 1297) that permits an unaccountable Local Coordinating Entity to submit a management plan for the above stated area that will be approved and audited by the US Secretary of Interior and recommendations for the role of the National Park Service and other Federal agencies associated with the proposed Heritage Area above.The testimony today from those who support the National Heritage Area spoke of Native Hawaiians as a commodity - the continuation of commodification and prostitution of Hawaiian Culture - all in the name of toursim (the continuation of Hawaii's failing dependent economy). Those in support of the National Heritage Area veiw preserving Native Hawaiian culture by federalizing Native Hawaiian lands. The Hawaii Capital Cultural Coalition (HCCC - Local Coordinating Entity) has begun a strong campaign in the tourist industry (inclusive of arts affiliated non-profits) to ensure the Resolutions above (HCR22, HR24, SCR3, SR6, and SCR42) and the Federal Legislation S.359 and H.R. 1297 pass. For example, DLNR submitted testimony supporting the National Heritage Area, along with Iolani Palace. This should raise "red flags". Especially when Kippen de Alba Chu of Iolani Palace stated in his testimony that "Hawaiians should have nothing to fear". Native Hawaiians, there is much to fear with this designation. It is the continued "fedralization" of our land and people.Therefore, Native Hawaiians and concerned constituents who will be impacted by the National Heritage Area are called to testify this Friday, April 3, 2009 at 1:15 pm in Conference Room 016 in OPPOSITION to SCR3. An example testimony is attached and can be submitted via email to:senfukunaga@Capitol.hawaii.govsenbaker@Capitol.hawaii.govsenhee@Capitol.hawaii.govsendige@Capitol.hawaii.govsenslom@Capitol.hawaii.govsentaniguchi@Capitol.hawaii.govsentakamine@capitol.hawaii.govsenbunda@Capitol.hawaii.govsengabbard@Capitol.hawaii.govsennishihara@Capitol.hawaii.govand fax to the:Senate Sergeant-At-Arms at (808) 586-6659It is highly recommended that testimony in OPPOSITION to SCR3 (including HCR22, HR24, SR6, and SCR42) be submitted prior to tomorrow at 12:00 pm. Equally important is being present on Friday, April 3, 2009 at 1:15 pm in Conference Room 016.If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email at tamardefries@hotmail.com. Please feel free to forward email content to your contacts. Mahalo.Me ke aloha pumehana,Tamar deFriesApril 1, 2009Honorable Carol Fukunaga, Chair11th Senatorial DistrictHawaii State Capitol, Room 216415 South Beretania StreetHonolulu, HI 96813Brian T. Taniguchi, Chair10th Senatorial DistrictHawaii State Capitol, Room 219415 South Beretania StreetHonolulu, HI 96813Date: Friday, April 3, 2009Time: 1:15 pmRE: OPPOSITION TO SCR3 (HCR22, HR24, SR6, and SCR42) - REQUESTING CONGRESS TO DESIGNATE THE HAWAII CAPITAL CULTURAL DISTRICT AS A NATIONAL HERITAGE AREADear Chairs and Committee Members,I thank you for allowing me to submit this letter in STRONG OPPOSITION to SCR3 (HCR22, HR24, SR6, and SCR42), which are: REQUESTING CONGRESS TO DESIGNATE THE HAWAII CAPITAL CULTURAL DISTRICT AS A NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. The reasons for OPPOSING SCR3 (HCR22, HR24, SR6, and SCR42) is as follows:a. This would create an additional federal designation (an extension of the National Park Service) over a broad area of greater urban Honolulu: the extent and scope of restrictions resulting from this designation is unclear.b. The sites that the NHA designation proposes to further preserve already have state and national preservation status and protection (i.e. Bishop Museum, Iolani Palace, Queen Emma Summer Palace, and Chinatown).c. The local managing entity allowed under this designation would be essentially unaccountable (not elected by the people) and with no oversight as the NPS usually takes a hand-off approach.d. Likewise, there seems to be no recourse for community stakeholders within the NHA designation area to protest decisions of the local managing entity. To what body would a citizen appeal a decision of the local managing entity?e. As stated in their study, the local managing authority has the right to inventory each property within the designated area --- the two ahupuaa of Kalihi and Nuuanu (Honolulu Ahupuaa and Kapalama Ahupuaa - mountain to sea) --- and evaluate that property’s historic significance and recommend that it be managed or acquired by the City, State or some other entity. It is unclear whether that property owner would be able to make changes or renovations easily if the property is deemed a fine example of some particular style (exact language from the study given below*).f. Reducing and possibly removing local and State authority, as the Secretary of Interior approves the management plan and shall prepare a report with recommendations for the future role of the National Park Service.g. While, under the act, Federal funds are not allowed to be used for condemnation purposes, with a recommendation from the NHA managing entity, the City can apply for grants for the purposes of condemnation.h. The board members of the HCCC and the organizations that comprise it are made up of primarily arts-affiliated non-profits and tourist-related businesses and state entities. WHAT IS MISSING ARE THE COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS WITHIN THE DESIGNATED AREA: THE RESIDENTS, LOCAL BUSINESSES AND LOCAL COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS. They have been left out of this process --- many have known nothing about this proposed legislation even though it has been in the works for the past 6 years. In some instances, key non-profit associations have been part of the NHA planning process and yet failed to inform local stakeholders in the communities which they serve.i. The process itself has not been inclusive: A key requirement of the proposed NHA designation is that the local community supports the designation and the boundaries of the proposed heritage area. Besides the arts groups which comprise the coalition there has been little effective effort to inform the affected community. Known community stakeholders were not informed of the process until after legislation was introduced at the national level. Many community stakeholders who will be affected by this legislation know little or nothing about it. * Language from the Hawaii Capital National Heritage Area Suitability/Feasibility Study, in reference to “section e” above: “In addition to the further compilation of existing data, additional field surveys of the many residential and mixed-use areas within the proposed NHA will also be required. This will include individual evaluations of houses and small businesses in Palama, Liliha, Kaka’ako and especially Kalihi, all of which have many remaining examples of modest frame houses, buildings, housing manufacturing and repair shops and simple concrete block and frame shops and mixed-use buildings.” (Hawaii Capital National Heritage Area Suitability/Feasibility Study, p. 54).“The HCC envisions…potential designation of residential and mixed-use areas either as state or National register properties … (Ibid, p. 62).I believe every effort should be made to seek the WITHDRAWAL of the Hawaii Congressional Delegation for the Hawaii Capitol National Heritage Area and request the WITHDRAW of Federal Legislation introduced as S.359 and H.R.1297 that seeks to establish the Hawai'i Capital National Heritage Area and for other purposes.Furthermore, resident consultation – in particular Native Hawaiian consultation – has not taken place in accordance to three of the four National Park Service critical steps: 2) Public involvement in the suitability/feasibility study; 3) Demonstration of widespread public support among heritage area residents for the proposed designation; and 4) Commitment to the proposal from key constituents, which may include governments, industry, and private, non-profit organizations, in addition to area residents. Therefore, I am in STRONG OPPOSITION to SCR3 (HCR22, HR24, SR6, and SCR42).Me ke aloha pumehana,NAMEADDRESSPHONE NUMBER
Read more…
Hawaiians are ‘injured’ over court’s land rulingDisrupt public meeting for off-road park projectFoster.jpgNative Hawaiian Foster Ampong of Lahaina opposes an off-highway vehicle park in Wahikuli during a public meeting Wednesday night at the Lahaina Civic Center. Ampong’s vehement objections and those of Native Hawaiians who don’t want the park on former Hawaiian crown lands caused state officials to end the meeting early.LAHAINA - A public meeting to discuss a proposed off-road vehicle park in Wahikuli was cut short Tuesday evening when several Native Hawaiians loudly objected to the project proposed on nearly 670 acres of state land.The meeting came the same day the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state's authority to sell or transfer public lands formerly owned by the kingdom of Hawaii."You wasting your time up there. I'm the owner of the land," said John Aquino of Lahaina, who was the first to disrupt the meeting at the Lahaina Civic Center. "This is shibai. It's not going to happen."Aquino and other Native Hawaiians objected to the state's proposal to set up an off-road Wahikuli trail riding park on 669.5 acres, saying the state does not have clear title to the land.Another Native Hawaiian, Foster Ampong, held the attention of approximately 130 audience members for around 10 minutes while he spoke about the pain Hawaiians have about crown lands, particularly after the high court's ruling was issued Tuesday."Hawaiians today feel very, very, injured," he said. Later, he added: "Today is a bad day to have this meeting."I so against this," Ampong said of the project. But "I'm not against the riders."The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a 1993 congressional resolution apologizing for the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom in 1893 didn't strip the state of its authority over 1.2 million acres of former crown lands. The ruling overturned a decision by the Hawaii Supreme Court that blocked the sale of land conveyed to Hawaii when it became the 50th state. The high court returned the issue to the Hawaii Supreme Court for further action.After adjourning the meeting about an hour earlier than expected, Torrie Nohara, Maui manager for the state's Na Ala Hele Trails and Access Program, said she would discuss what happened at the meeting with the program's advisory board.The discussion could include looking for other locations for the park, Nohara said.Na Ala Hele has been assisting off-road vehicle enthusiasts looking for a legal place to ride on the island.John Torres, a longtime off-road rider, remained positive after the meeting."We're going to keep moving forward," said Torres, president of the Maui Off-Highway Vehicle Association, which is working with the state on the proposed park. "This is a recreational issue. It isn't a racial issue."He added that the riders are not trying to take away land from the local Hawaiian residents, but they are trying to give off-road riders a legal place to ride as well as a safe place to educate their children about riding."The unfortunate part, no matter where you go on this island, you going to face opposition," Torres said.For more than 30 years, off-road riders have been looking for a legal place to ride. They say they have no choice but to ride on private properties or other places where they are unwelcome. The Maui Raceway Park is a place they can ride legally, but enthusiasts say it is only a track, not riding trails.Torres said the Big Island and Oahu have places where riders can go legally.Before the meeting was interrupted, Nohara was conducting a slide-show presentation about the history of the project and told audience members it has taken years to find a spot for the park. She said locations were sought throughout Maui, but large private landowners such as Alexander & Baldwin and Maui Land & Pineapple Co. turned down proposals for off-road trails on their property, she said.The Wahikuli park would provide 30 to 40 miles of trails. It is proposed for lands located about 1 mile mauka of the Lahaina Civic Center. The property reaches into the mountains above Wahikuli and is bordered on the right and the left by two privately owned, undeveloped parcels of land. It is bordered makai by the Honokohau Ditch.The proposed Wahikuli off-highway vehicle park is also part of the state Department of Land and Natural Resource's proposed Recreational Renaissance plan. The plan would use nonresident park admission and money from new land leases to pay for restoration and preservation projects for state parks, trails and ocean recreation facilities.In the plan, the Wahikuli park is budgeted for $3 million. Construction could begin as early as 2012. State legislators would need to approve funding for the project as well as revenue sources for the Recreational Renaissance plan.* Melissa Tanji can be reached at mtanji@mauinews.com.Hemo3.gif
Read more…

Navy on notice over reef damage

PORT ROYAL GROUNDING

Navy on notice over reef damage

The state demands that restoration begin before the cost is finalized

STORY SUMMARY | READ THE FULL STORY

The state put the Navy on notice this week that it will be held responsible for the damage the $1 billion warship USS Port Royal caused when it was stuck on a reef for nearly four days in February. The Navy also should pay the cost of emergency efforts to prevent further damage to the reef and must pay for the restoration of the reef, the state argues.

The diesel-powered cruiser ran aground in water about 14 to 22 feet deep near Honolulu Airport on Feb. 5 when it was offloading sailors, contractors and shipyard workers after a day of sea trials. The 567-foot cruiser was pulled free nearly four days later.

The Navy was to meet with the state today to discuss the findings of its investigation and "proposed courses of action" — information that still has not been made public. Nor has it released information on the fate of the Port Royal's skipper, Capt. John Carroll, or any of the sailors or officers standing watch when the ship ran aground.

— Gregg K. Kakesako

blockedLine_onWhite.gif

FULL STORY >>

By Gregg K. Kakesako

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Apr 02, 2009

The state has given the Navy a month to decide whether it will work to stabilize ongoing damage to the reef, coral and other natural resources caused by the grounding of the $1 billion warship USS Port Royal near the Honolulu Airport last month.

In a four-page letter to Vice Adm. Bruce MacDonald, Navy judge advocate general in Washington, D.C., Laura Thielen, chairwoman of the state Board of Land and Natural Resources, said the state has not yet tallied the costs of the emergency mitigation for the immediate damaged caused by the 9,600-ton warship, the value of the coral damaged and attempts to free the Pearl Harbor-based warship.

However, the state wants the Navy to minimize the damage caused by the warship without waiting for the state's final assessment on the entire recovery and restoration costs.

Thielen warned that costs will increase substantially unless the Navy acts to immediately mitigate the primary damage impacts by assisting in the recovery of injured coral; preventing further secondary damage by removing or stabilizing significant amounts of damaged coral rubble prior to the arrival of large south summer swells; and protecting loose live coral to prevent further damage to public trust resources, in coordination with the state and in compliance with emergency permitting requirements.

Mark Matsunaga, Navy spokesman, said, "The Navy has been working on a proposal to mediate the damage caused by the grounding of USS Port Royal in coordination with the state of Hawaii."

He said the Navy was to meet with the state today to discuss the findings of its investigation and "proposed courses of action."

That information still has not been made public. Nor has the Navy released any information on the fate of the Port Royal's skipper, Capt. John Carroll, or any of the sailors or officers who were standing watch just after dusk on Feb. 5, when the grounding occurred.

The 567-foot-long Port Royal ran aground the reef in water about 14 to 22 feet deep. After several unsuccessful attempts, the guided-missile cruiser was removed on Feb. 9.

The state Health Department already has said the Navy will not be fined over the ship's dumping 7,000 gallons of waste water while it was stuck for nearly four days on a reef a half-mile south of Honolulu Airport.


[Preview] Price Unknown For Environmental Damages From Port Royal
[Preview]

Repairs to the navy ship are expected to cost taxpayers around $40 million and the state is worried that habitats for Hawaiian animals were damaged.

Laurence Lau, deputy director for environmental health administration, said that under the federal Clean Water Act, the state has "no jurisdiction over a Navy warship."

However, Thielen said the Navy will have to pay to mitigate the algae bloom effects caused by the waste-water spill as well as biological and possible ecological problems caused by the paint scraped off the Port Royal's hull. The state is waiting for the results of a toxicity study.

Thielen in her letter said the state wants immediate assistance to minimize "the amount of primary damage resulting from the grounding incident and to prevent potentially devastating secondary damage that could be aggravated by the upcoming summer swell."

Thielen added that at a March 5 meeting of Navy, Justice Department, Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration officials, state officials gave the Navy 15 CDs of dive photos, a CD of measurements of the main coral scar and other related documents.

Thielen said the primary damage area covers about six to 10 acres, and the "main injury scar" to the reef covers about 9,600 square feet. Federal and state officials have found "extensive" damage to the reef, live coral and rocks in the area. Some of the damage was caused by the anchor chains dropped from the cruiser, tow boat cables and possible grounding of tugboats.

The incident also may have damaged the habitat of green sea turtles, Thielen added.

"The reef that was injured is an ancient one, full of coral colonies, some of which took hundreds of years to reach their present size. A complex reef structure such as the one that was present prior to this injury forms numerous and intricate houses for the myriad of fish, invertebrates and sea turtles that use this reef for shelter and food resources," she said.

Further damage could be caused in a larger surrounding area, Thielen added, by the coral rubble moved about by currents and waves.

The Port Royal has been dry-docked at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard since Feb. 19 and faces at least $40 million in repairs to its hull, sonar dome and propeller blades.

Read more…
NATIVE HAWAIIAN SCHOLARS DECRY GRAVE DESECRATIONIndian Country Today - March 25, 2009As Kānaka Maoli [native Hawaiian] scholars we write to follow-up on our statement from September 13, 2008 publicly condemning the state-sponsored desecration of a Native Hawaiian burial site at Wainiha, Kaua`i resulting from the construction of a new home at Naue Point by California real estate developer Joseph Brescia. Both the state abuse of power and the desecration continue unabated and must come to a halt....Read Their Entire Letter Here
Read more…

NC

So I'm Here Gaining Experience of life . more to come
Read more…

Journey to nowhere

Hey there,Today has been a beautiful day. I attended institute which was very uplifting and spiritual. Walked home with Steven and Lynnette, it was quite breezy. Headed home for a quick sesh and headed back to campus for African dance, only to find out that I have an essay due next class. life is good. Met Sia in the hall and planned to practice our dance on Friday. I'm hoping to have a movie night, and maybe give blood tomorrow morning. Hauoli La Hanau Kawika Carlbom - - i think :) Another day has passed, soon I will be home. Until then, it's just another day in Paradise.A hui hou.
Read more…

FREE HAWAI`I TV - SUPERFERRY'S SECRET PLAN

FREEHAWAII.INFO PRESENTSFREE HAWAI`I TVTHE FREE HAWAI`I BROADCASTING NETWORK "WHY THEY DID IT - SUPERFERRY'S SECRET PLAN"If You Thought The Superferry Never Made Sense You Weren't Alone.So What Were They Really Up To?See Their Secret Plan Here & Why They Cut & Ran.The Answers Will Surprise You.
Read more…
Everyone seems alarmed and spooked. Why? It was very predictable and would not go as far as many wanted. Once again the question was very narrow. This ruse is to promote the Akaka Bill and get compliance from the kanaka maoli who are on the fence or against it. Remember this is a scare tactic and a form of terrorism.It's strange that not many took to heart of what I said. The surprise was OHA's stab in the back to the kanaka maoli that made the USSC decision a piece of cake, and with the help of AG Bennet who wasted the Hawai'i's taxpayers' money aiding and abetting with the governor, Dingle Lingle.Bennet's folly was using the Newland's Resolution to validate the transfer of seized/stolen lands of the Hawaiian Kingdom and at the same time discredited the Apology Resolution. This is where the USSC did not want to go. OHA made it easier by acknowledging the State's legal (?) right to the lands and admitting the native Hawaiians had no legal rights to it because of the Newlands Resolution but that the Apology Bill admits U.S. complicity and involvement to overthrow the Hawaiian Kingdom; so a settlement is in order to make things right and remain a U.S. state.The question Bennet filed was do the states of the United States have clear title to do as it chooses with the lands ceded within its boundaries as a public trust which was handed to the state by the U.S. government.When he entered court, he brought up the Newlands resolution as the basis for the lands being ceded to the U.S. legally and Hawai'i subsequently admitted as a state of the Union. The lands held in trust was transferred to the newly created State as a public trust for specified uses, a unique grant from the U.S. only for Hawai'i and not for other states (See the Admission's Act).He was admonished for using that as an argument because the Supreme Court did not want to go there. What saved his pathetic ass was the fact that OHA did not contest the validity of the Newlands Resolution but sided with the Hawaii State Supreme Court in adjudicating a settlement because of the Apology Bill and promoting the Akaka Bill.Bennet's argument was that the Apology Bill was symbolic which didn't affect the Newlands Resolution. What surprised the USSC which made them elated was that the Defendants (OHA) agreed with the State; but because of the Apology Bill, reconcilliation (thru the Akaka Bill) would settle the matter.It was then known that the state was working on resolving this issue with the "ceded lands" and would resolve the matter within the U.S. confines through a settlement (Akaka Bill) and no matter the verdict, the HSSC and the SOH would settle the matter brought forth to the USSC. So discounting the Apology Bill, the U.S. states has the right to sell the lands given to them by the Federal government.Now comes the real action. Since Bennet brought up the validity of the Newlands Resolution which no one contested, this issue is still alive whether anyone knows it or not. If Hawai'i nationals want to roll over and die; then let this go. If you want to fight for your country; then the answer is to bring this issue up in appeals to invalidate the Newlands Resolution of 1898. Add to this, is the Turpie Resolution of 1894 and the Ku'e Petitions of 1897.This is strengthened by the lack of a Treaty of Annexation and Oct 4, 1988 Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel within the U.S. Department of Justice, which questioned the constitutional power which Congress used that gave them the authority to annex Hawai'i.Representative Ball in 1898, asserted that the effort to annex Hawai'i by joint resolution after the defeat of the treaty as a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which cannot be lawfully done.Congress has the power under Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution to admit NEW STATES into the nation; but not land and people to be retained as a possession or in a territorial condition.--- Andrew C. McLaughlin, A Constitutional History of the United States 504 (1936).In the North American Review, 1893, Volume 157 issue 445, Rep. William Springer (D) Maine responds to U.S. Minister Stevens entered journal regarding the Hawaiian issue and denounced their actions against the Queen's government of the Kingdom of Hawaii.Another congressman, D.H.Chamberlain of New York wrote a scathing article in the New York Times, 12 Feb. 1894, titled as Hawaii Stolen Property - The President's only recourse was to restore it. judging the policy of the Administration based on law, fact, and right; President Harrison's hasty action, following unwarranted interference by the Minister at Hawaii- caused the difficulty; careful analysis of events justifies the call for the Queen's restoration.The Blount Report is reported accurately from Hawai'i, fairly, and constitutionally accepted as being commissioned by the President Cleveland. From that and the Queen's protest, Cleveland urged Congress to restore the Queen and Hawai'i's government to her people and to give amnesty to the U.S. American conspirators and traitors.While the Morgan Report was specifically rendered, only out of Washington, D.C., to exonerate the U.S. and its conspirators. Morgan was the Grand Dragon of the KKK and firmly believed in racial segregation who was an expansionist arguing for annexation of Hawai'i in hopes to send all the blacks to Hawai'i and out of the continental U.S.June 17, 1897, the Queen presented an Official Protest to the Treaty of Annexation in Washington, D.C. This was the second Official Protest; the first was on 17 January 1893, the date of the U.S. invasion and the following belligerent occupation of Hawai'i which still continues today.Miriam Michelson, reporter for The San Francisco Call, did an investigative report in Hawai'i and wrote it out on the way back to her city which was published Thursday Morning, September 30, 1897. She confirmed "...For Hawaii has not asked for annexation. There are 100,000 people on the islands. Of these not 3 percent have declared for annexation. To the natives the loss of nationality is hateful, aberrant."Professor Francis A. Boyle (International Law expert) stated, "The Kingdom of Hawai'i has been under the military occupation of the United States government since 1893, to which the laws of belligerent occupation apply (see US Army Field Manual 27-10 [1956]) And belligerent occupation does not transfer or displace sovereignty, which still resides in the Kingdom and its people."Steven T. Newcomb is Director of the Indigenous Law Institute and a Research fellow at the Fourth World Center for Study of Indigenous Law and Politics. His article printed in the Honolulu Advertiser, Sunday, March 12, 2000 - B3, headlines:Justice memo shows U.S. never legally annexed Hawaii - "...The Justice Department memo enables us to arrive at a number of conclusions. No annexation of the Hawaiian Islands ever legally occurred in 1898. The 'Territory of Hawaii' was not established in 1900, despite congressional legislation purporting to the contrary. The statehood vote was an attempt to hide an illegal act that began in 1893 with U.S. complicity.And indigenous Hawaiians, nearly all of whom opposed U.S. annexation, and most of whom did not become citizens of the so-caolled Republic of Hawaii, have never been rightfully subject to the U.S. Constitution. This means kanaka maoli still have an inherent right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they may freely determine their own political status, including the option of independence, and freely determine their economic, social, and cultural development."These are just a few of the documents available and should be circulated often and widely. So, instead of buying into their scare tactics and terrorist actions to have native Hawaiians comply and shepherd themselves into the Akaka Bill fiasco and the Kau Inoa manipulative roster to further their unlawful actions to attempt to usurp the legitimate Kingdom of Hawai'i which still exists. Knowing some of this, are you still willing to trade in your lei hulu for eagle feathers and pow wow or keep your lei hulu and "kaukau"?Tane...............I forgot to mention that there is a journal revealing the meeting or communication between Thurston and U.S. Secy James Blaine in which Blaine asked Thurston to destabilize the Hawaiian kingom and takeover the kingdom without setting international precedent. He added that the U.S. would be open to annexation of the islands to the U.S.A. A very dear friend and associate of Blaine was Minister Stevens who got kicked out of Paraguay and Uruguay for inciting the people to topple their government and annex their country to the U.S.A. He was sent to Sweden to cool off until they needed him in Hawai'i To support the takeover and place the U.S. traitors as the Provisional government which later changed its name to the Republic of Hawai'i under the protection of the U.S. Military. Harrison was frothing at the mouth, pissed that the so-called treaty of annexation wasn't passed in congress and he wanted it done before he left office. Cleveland succeeded him and learned of the Queen's protest and withdrew the treaty; then sent Blount to Hawai'i to investigate the event.The journals revealed what they thought of Hawai'i and the conspirators and the Queen and the Hawaiian "niggers". Those involved, supported their actions with lies and misinformation; while others condemned their criminal actions and the use of the U.S. military.We've got all these "bullets" and why wasn't any of this brought into court? OHA , the State of Hawai'i, and the U.S. federal government and corporations and military have been complicit in keeping the truth covered up and don't want this going before the USSC. Think about it. They have committed criminal acts; violated the treaties and the laws of occupation; disregarded the laws of neutrality and dismissed our neutrality status. U.S. citizens and foreigners that have entered and resided in Hawai'i in 1893 till now are violating the laws of occupation.Now you understand why the USSC do not want to address this situation; this would eventually force the U.S. and it's loyal citizens and military to de-occupy the Kingdom of Hawai'i. The consequences and rammification because of the fraud is devastating for the U.S. to bear and gets worse for them as the belligerent occupation continues. It's the record-holding of the longest belligerent occupation that rivals Tibet and Palestine.This is the tip of the iceberg that splays the British and French for their criminal activities throughout the world, the parents of the U.S.A., Canada, New Zealand, and Australia, etc. Enough is enough; wouldn't you say?Tane
Read more…