All Posts (6512)

Sort by
Expansion Plans Turn Out To Be All WetThe Hawai`i Superferry recently announced a delay in delivery of a second ship that was to have sailed between O`ahu and Hawai`i island.Now the Maui News reports the Superferry is also trimming the schedule for its remaining vessel on the Oahu-Maui route and hiking some prices as it switches to a "fall schedule," according to a company spokeswoman.
Read more…
Military occupation and the laws of warThere have long been customary laws of belligerent occupation as part of the laws of war which gave some protection to the population under the military occupation of a belligerent power. These were clarified and supplemented by the Hague Conventions of 1907. Specifically "Laws and Customs of War on Land" (Hague IV); October 18, 1907: "Section III Military Authority over the territory of the hostile State."[1] The first two articles of that section state:Art. 42.Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.Art. 43.The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.In 1949 these laws governing belligerent occupation of an enemy state's territory were further extended by the adoption of the Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV). Much of GCIV is relevant to protected persons in occupied territories and Section III: Occupied territories is a specific section covering the issue.Article 6 restricts the length of time that most of GCIV applies:The present Convention shall apply from the outset of any conflict or occupation mentioned in Article 2.In the territory of Parties to the conflict, the application of the present Convention shall cease on the general close of military operations.In the case of occupied territory, the application of the present Convention shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such Power exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the present Convention: 1 to 12, 27, 29 to 34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 59, 61 to 77, 143.GCIV emphasised an important change in international law. The United Nations Charter (June 26, 1945) had prohibited war of aggression (See articles 1.1, 2.3, 2.4) and GCIV Article 47, the first paragraph in Section III: Occupied territories, restricted the territorial gains which could be made through war by stating:Protected persons who are in occupied territory shall not be deprived, in any case or in any manner whatsoever, of the benefits of the present Convention by any change introduced, as the result of the occupation of a territory, into the institutions or government of the said territory, nor by any agreement concluded between the authorities of the occupied territories and the Occupying Power, nor by any annexation by the latter of the whole or part of the occupied territory.Article 49 prohibits the forced mass movement of people out of or into occupied state's territory:Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive. ... The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.Protocol I (1977): "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts" has additional articles which cover military occupation but many countries including the U.S. are not signatory to this additional protocol.In the situation of a territorial cession as the result of war, the specification of a "receiving country" in the peace treaty merely means that the country in question is authorized by the international community to establish civil government in the territory. The military government of the principal occupying power will continue past the point in time when the peace treaty comes into force, until it is legally supplanted."Military government continues until legally supplanted" is the rule, as stated in Military Government and Martial Law, by William E. Birkhimer, 3rd edition 1914.In most wars some territory is placed under the authority of the hostile army. Most military occupations end with the cessation of hostilities. In some cases the occupied territory is returned and in others the land remains under the control of the occupying power but usually not as militarily occupied territory.Even if the foreign armed forces meet no armed resistance and there is no fighting, once territory comes under the effective control of the foreign armed forces the laws on occupation are applicable.As interpreted by Human Rights Watch, defending human rights worldwide (hrw.org); the names USA and Russia have been interchanged. These are excerpts extracted from their website:Does applying occupation law toUSA affect the status of the territory that USA occupies?Applying the law of occupation, or deeming USA an occupying power for the purposes of international humanitarian law, does not in any way affect the sovereignty of the territory. Sovereignty is not transferred to the occupying power.The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Commentary to the Fourth Geneva Convention notes that the obligations of the Convention begin as soon as there is contact between the civilian population of a territory and troops advancing into that territory, i.e. at the soonest possible moment. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, protected persons are all those who find themselves in the hands of a party to the conflict or an occupying power of which they are not nationals. While all of the duties imposed on an occupying power may not become applicable immediately (some presuppose the presence of the occupation authorities for a fairly long period), the entirety of the provisions relating to the rights enjoyed by protected persons and their treatment become applicable immediately.What are the basic principles of international humanitarian law underlying military occupation?International humanitarian law provides that once an occupying power has assumed authority over a territory, it is obliged to restore and maintain, as far as possible, public order and safety (Hague, art. 43). Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, the occupying power must also respect the fundamental human rights of the territory’s inhabitants, including noncitizens (Geneva IV, arts. 29, 47) and ensure sufficient hygiene and public health standards, as well as the provision of food and medical care to the population under occupation (G IV, arts. 55,56). Collective punishment and reprisals are prohibited (Protocol I, 75). Personnel of the International Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement must be allowed to carry out their humanitarian activities (G IV, art. 63).What are the protection obligations of an occupying power towards the local population?An occupying power is responsible for respecting the fundamental human rights of the population under its authority. All persons shall be treated humanely and without discrimination based on ethnicity, religion or other basis. This includes respecting family honor and rights, the lives of persons, and private property, as well as religious and customary convictions and practice.An occupying power is specifically prohibited from carrying out reprisals and collective penalties against persons or their property (G IV, art. 33) and from taking hostages (G IV, art. 34). In general, no one can be punished for acts for which he or she has not personally committed. All parties to a conflict are required to provide information on prisoners of war (G III, art. 122) and “protected persons” (civilian nationals) in their custody (G IV, art. 136).The occupying power is prohibited from forcibly transferring or deporting protected persons outside of the occupied territory irrespective of motive (G IV, art. 49).What are the obligations of an occupying power to provide for well-being of the population?Generally, an occupying power is responsible for ensuring that food and medical care is available to the population under its control, and to facilitate assistance by relief agencies.An occupying force has a duty to ensure the food and medical supplies of the population, as well as maintain hospitals and other medical services, “to the fullest extent of the means available to it” (G IV, arts. 55, 56). This includes protecting civilian hospitals, medical personnel, and the wounded and sick. Medical personnel, including recognized Red Cross/Red Crescent societies, shall be allowed to carry out their duties (G IV, arts. 56, 63). The occupying power shall make special efforts for children orphaned or separated from their families (G IV, art. 24) and facilitate the exchange of family news (G IV, arts. 25, 26).If any part of the population of an occupied territory is inadequately supplied, the occupying power shall facilitate relief by other states and impartial humanitarian agencies (G IV, art. 59). However, the provision of assistance by others does not relieve the occupying force of its responsibilities to meet the needs of the population (G IV, art. 60). The occupying power shall ensure that relief workers are respected and protected.When can civilians be detained or taken prisoner by an occupying power?The Fourth Geneva Convention permits the internment or assigned residence of protected persons for “imperative reasons of security.” This must be carried out in accordance with a regular procedure permissible under international humanitarian law and allow for the right of appeal and for review by a competent body at least every six months (G IV, art. 78). The Fourth Geneva Convention provides detailed regulations for the humane treatment of internees. The ICRC must be given access to all protected persons, wherever they are, whether or not they are deprived of their liberty.When can civilians be required to work by an occupying power?Adults (individuals 18 years or older) may be required to work as is necessary to maintain public utilities, and to meet needs of the USA army and humanitarian needs, such as activities related to feeding, sheltering, clothing, health care of the civilian population. People must be appropriately compensated for their work, and there can be no obligation to work based on any form of discrimination. People must not be transported to other places to carry out work, but perform it in the area of occupation. People should as far as possible be kept in the jobs they already hold and fair wages and conditions of employment as set out in legislation, must be met. (G IV, art. 51) Unpaid or abusive forced labor, or work that amounts to partaking in military operations, is strictly prohibited.What obligations exist concerning the property and resources of the occupied territory?In general, the destruction of private or public property is prohibited unless military operations make it absolutely necessary (G IV, art 53). Cultural property is entitled to special protection; the occupying power must take measures to preserve cultural property (Cultural Property Convention, art.5). As a rule, private property cannot be confiscated. Religious, charitable and educational institutions are to be treated as private property. The occupying power may requisition food and medical supplies for occupation forces and administrative personnel so long as the needs of the civilian population have been taken into account and fair payment is made (G IV, art. 55). Taxes and tariffs may also be imposed to defray the administrative costs of the occupation, including the cost of occupying forces (Hague, art. 49).Public properties are treated as either movable or immovable property. Movable government properties that may be used for military purposes (transport, weapons) are considered “spoils of war” and may be seized without compensation (Hague, art. 53). Immovable government properties (public buildings, real estate) may not be appropriated; however they can be used and administered by the occupying power so long as their assets are maintained (Hague, art. 55). Any loss of value from their use must be compensated.
Read more…
The Hawaiian people have suffered since the first Western contact in 1778.Western diseases, to which Hawaiians had no immunity, decimated their numbers.At the time of western contact, some 800,000 people inhabited the Hawaiian Islands. By 1805 that number had been halved. By 1853 there were only 71,000 Hawaiian or part-Hawaiian people in the islands. Within 100 years of western contact, the Hawaiian population had been reduced by nearly 90 percent.According to the 2000 census, the numbers of people who claim some native Hawaiian ancestry have increased to over 400,000. But only 239,000 live in Hawai`i and they are the poorest, most locked-up population in the state.Although they only make up about 20 percent of the state's population, in June 2001 they made up 39 percent of the state's prison population, according to the state Department of Public Safety. And they make up 37 percent of the state's homeless population, according to a 2003 survey.Independence Is The Only Right To Correct The Wrong
Read more…
Sound Financial Position Or Sinking Ship?Pacific Business News reports citing an “uncertain economic climate,” Hawai`i Superferry said Tuesday it is postponing planned service of a second ship to the Big Island.Superferry President and CEO Tom Fargo said the one-year delay will defer more than $10 million in startup costs and allow the company to “maintain our sound financial position.”
Read more…
DLNR CLARIFIES HISTORY,
FUTURE OF ‘AHUPUA‘A ‘O KAHANA STATE PARK


http://hawaii.gov/dlnr/chair/pio/nr/2008/N8-126.pdf

For Immediate Release: October 28, 2008
DLNR CLARIFIES HISTORY,
FUTURE OF ‘AHUPUA‘A ‘O KAHANA STATE PARK
HONOLULU – Following the purchase of the Kahana ahupua‘a by the State in 1970 for park
purposes, the resident families then living in Kahana Valley and members of the surrounding
community joined with the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to develop the
unique concept of a "living park" to preserve the natural and cultural landscape of an intact
‘ahupua‘a.
"The department respects the original vision of the living park, and dedication of the many
community members who spent approximately 15 years developing plans to accommodate a
limited number of private residential leases in the park where each lessee provides 25 hours a
month in interpretive services supporting the living park in place of a lease rent," said Laura H.
Thielen, DLNR chairperson
"This agreement struck a balance between the interests of the original valley residents and the
broader public park purpose where educational opportunities would be provided to visitors by
the residents," she said.
"The balance recognized that the number of lots could not increase, otherwise the public park
would eventually become a private subdivision. The families recognized that as their children
grew up, not all of them would be able to remain in the park or build new homes there."
Over time, several adult children honored the agreement and moved out of the valley. Six
families however remained on site without leases in the hope of receiving a lease. When three
leases were defaulted, 28 families applied for new leases, including some of the adult children
and relatives of original tenants who honored the agreement and left the valley but who want to
return.
In March 2008 the Attorney General notified the department there is no legal authority to issue
any new leases.
"While we understand the emotional attachment and history these six families have to this
valley, it would be unfair to penalize the adult children who honored the agreement and moved
out, and it would be unfair to the public to keep increasing the number of lots over time and lose
the public park," said Thielen.
"We will give the six families a bit more time to prepare to move, and we will bring additional
transition service providers this week to provide assistance to help with this transition. I
recognize that up until last summer the families and the department thought there would be an
opportunity to issue three leases, and that the families need more assistance and time to prepare
themselves. We met with the families earlier this year to discuss the decision and brought
service providers to assist them in their move, but I can understand that they were not prepared to
accept the decision at that time. Accordingly we will not move forward with any eviction this
week.
"I have shared my concerns with Representative Meyer and Senator Hee and am willing to sit
down with them again tomorrow. I will also be seeking a meeting with the six families to talk
the matter over with them directly to see if there is any additional assistance the department can
provide. However, I strongly encourage the families to take advantage of the service providers
we are bringing to assist because I have not yet heard a solution that respects the original
agreement, is fair to the adult children and residents who followed that agreement, and protects
public interest in the living park."
DLNR is continuing to work with the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA), Alu Like, Catholic
Charities and others to find transitional services for the six families.
# # #
For more information news media may contact:
Deborah Ward
DLNR Public information specialist
Phone: (808) 587-0320

Read more…

FREE HAWAI`I TV - YOUR CHANCE FOR CHANGE

FREEHAWAII.INFO PRESENTSFREE HAWAI`I TVTHE FREE HAWAI`I BROADCASTING NETWORK "YOUR CHANCE FOR CHANGE" They've Lied, Bought Kau Inoa Signers, & Cooked The Books.Now Office Of Hawaiian Affairs Trustees Want Your Vote.Is This Your Chance For Change?Watch & Find Out.

Read more…

Lili‘u's "He ‘Ai na Kalani"

Lili‘u's "He ‘Ai na Kalani"na Kīhei de SilvaHui Hānai suggests that Lili‘u composed this mele for one of two events in Kalākaua’s reign: his return, in 1881, from his tour of the world, or his change of residence, in 1888, from Honolulu to Kailua, Hawai‘i. Her mele describes the special foods that were prepared on these significant occasions, the cherished friends who served them, and the respectful silence that traditionally accompanied the royal meal.[1]But "He ‘Ai na ka Lani" is more than a song about satisfying the appetite. ‘Ai means "to rule" as well as "to eat." The nature of the foods prepared and consumed by Kalākaua suggests that they were selected as much (or more) for their symbolism as for their taste. "‘Oene kalo mana" in verse two refers to the last and smallest corms (‘oene) of a crop of kalo mana, a variety of taro propagated for its mana-giving, medicinal properties.[2] In one sense, the verse identifies Kalākaua as the last and "smallest" of a long line of powerful, god-like chiefs. In another, it offers him the last remaining mana of these chiefly ancestors.The "poi lehua" of verse three refers, of course, to the tasty red poi made from the lehua variety of kalo, but it also suggests the figurative meanings of lehua that Kalākaua is meant to consume and embody. A person described as lehua is "laden" with strength, speed, beauty, and skill. He is a warrior, an expert, and a lover.[3] Poi lehua served by a hīnano sweetheart (the powder of the male hīnano blossom was thought to be a powerful aphrodisiac) further defines this installment of Kalākaua’s meal as meant to invest him with expertise that will bring fertility, ho‘oulu lāhui, to his declining people.The "ōpae māhikihiki" of verse four pertains, on the song’s most literal level, to "jumping" freshwater shrimp that wash downstream after heavy rains. These are easily caught on wicker platforms, dried, salted, and served as a tasty side-dish.[4] Mahiki, however, carries more serious connotations: it refers to the "peeling off" and disposing of wrongs in ho‘oponopono therapy and to the "exorcism of evil spirits" in ceremonies that often involved the use of shrimp called ‘ōpae mahiki.[5] As the fourth course of Kalākaua’s ritual meal, these shrimp symbolize his nation’s need for a leader capable of casting out evil and setting wrongs to right. This symbolism would have been especially powerful in 1888 when Kalākaua’s rule had been seriously compromised by American business interests, the Bayonet Constitution, and dissension among his own people.The "i‘a a‘ukū" of verse five is identified by Margaret Titcomb as the swordfish whose broad bill and physical strength were more appreciated than its taste. Hawaiians of old, she reports, did not consider the a‘ukū to be a delicacy; it was "eaten only when other fish [could] not be had; the flavor lack[ed] zest..."[6] The contrastingly high value of the fish as a symbol of authority is suggested in Hawaiian proverbs that emphasize the consequences of disrespect and dithering; be careful not to fall short of the mark or you will be "jabbed by the swordfish": "Mālama o kū i ke a‘u, ka i‘a nuku loa o ke kai,"[7] "‘Olo‘olo aku nō i hope, kū i ke a‘u."[8] This symbolism, particularly with regard to Kalākaua’s rule, is evident in Titcomb’s description of the a‘u as associated with rituals of conquest and power. The fish "made whoever captured it a conqueror, gave him power to succeed over an opponent. The fish could belong only to a chief, and was laid on the altar...with prayers by the kahuna for power for the chief."[9] Although a‘u-at-the-altar ceremonies may not have been conducted by Kalākaua’s people, Lili‘u’s desire to endow him with swordfish-like powers is certainly embodied in the dish served him by his "seafaring sweetheart.""He ‘Ai na ka Lani," then, is an extraordinary composition, one that operates, simultaneously, on levels of innocent festivity and ritual solemnity. On the first level it celebrates the pleasures of satisfying the chiefly appetite and palate: "Hush, the chief is enjoying his favorite foods; eat, enjoy; eat, enjoy!" And on the second level, it invests that chief with the symbolic meanings of the food he consumes: "The kapu is invoked; eat this for mana, eat this for fertility, eat this to cast out evil, eat this to conquer and rule; eat and rule, eat and rule."We have no record of the performance history of this mele, but we take great pleasure in imagining its presentation, by Lili‘u herself, to "mixed" company. Its deeper meaning would have flown completely over the heads of those who most threatened her brother’s rule, and -- at the same time -- it would have sailed straight to the na‘au of those for whom it was really intended. Her brother especially.He ‘Ai na KalaniKe ‘ai nei ‘o ka lani,Hāmau ‘oukou lākou nei a‘e.Mai noho a pane a‘e,Ua kapu ‘ē ka ‘aha i ke ali‘i.Hui: ‘Ai ē, ‘ai lā.Ke ‘ai nei ‘o ka laniI ka ‘oene i ke kalo mana,Lawea mai e ka ipo laua‘eO ka uka ‘iu‘iu o Lanihuli.Ke ‘ai nei ‘o ka laniI ka poi ‘ai lehua,Ho‘owali ‘ia e ka ipo hīnano,Maika‘i he pahe‘e ke moni aku.Ke ‘ai nei ‘o ka laniI ka ‘ōpae māhikihiki,Ki‘ina ‘ia e Fancy Lauli‘iO ka ua Tuahine o Mānoa.Ke ‘ai nei ‘o ka laniI ka i‘a a he a‘ukū,Hi‘i ‘ia mai e ka ipo ‘aukai,‘Au‘au ehu kai o ka moana.The royal one is dining now,You should all be silent.Make not a sound,The assembly is kapu in the presence of the ali‘i.Refrain: Eat, enjoy! Eat, enjoy!The royal one is dining nowOn the tender corms of the mana taro,Brought here by the laua‘e fern sweetheartFrom the high uplands of Lanihuli.The royal one is dining nowOn the red poi made from the lehua taro,Mixed by the hīnano sweetheart,So fine and smooth to swallow.The royal one is dining nowOn the māhikihiki shrimp,Caught by Miss Fancy DaintyFrom the Tuahine rains of Mānoa.The royal one is eating nowOn that fish, the swordfish,Brought here by the seafaring sweetheart,He who bathes in the sea spray of the ocean._________________________________Sources1) Hui Hānai, The Queen’s Songbook, 118-120.2) "He Ai no Kalani Kalakaua," Mele Book of Lili‘u, HI.M.7:117-118, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum Archives.3) Ohumukini and Beamer, The Compositions by, for, and about...Queen Liliuokalani, Kamehameha Schools Extension Ed. Dept., March 1978, 20.Select discography1) Eddia Kamae, Eddie Kamae Presents the Sons of Hawai‘i, Hawai‘i Sons, HSC 1001 (1973).2) Dennis Kamakahi, ‘Ohana, Dancing Cat 08022-38043-2 (1999).Text aboveHui Hānai, The Queen’s Songbook, 119. Translation: Hui Hānai, 119. Two dates of composition are given in Lili‘u's song books: 1881 and 1888; perhaps they indicate the initial and revised versions of her mele.Notes1. Hui Hānai, The Queen’s Songbook, 118-120.2. Pukui and Elbert, Hawaiian Dictionary, 275, 235.3. Ibid, 199.4. Mary Kawena Pukui, ‘Ōlelo No‘eau, #176.5. Dictionary, 219.6. Margaret Titcomb, Native Use of Fish, 68.7. "Take heed that you are not jabbed by the swordfish, the long-nosed fish of the sea. Do not annoy that fellow or you will suffer the consequences." ‘Ōlelo No‘eau, #2120.8. "Linger behind and be jabbed by the swordfish. Better to advance with one’s companions than to stay behind and get into trouble." ‘Ōlelo No‘eau, #2501.9. Titcomb, 68.© Kīhei de Silva, 2006. All rights reserved.
Read more…


For my family and friends some of whom I will end up haunting LOL:

Earlier today I went to see one of my clients. While driving there I thought about her possibly asking me who I was voting for and who I think is better between McCain and Obama. My choice is obvious. Who is against the Akaka Bill? McCain so obviously he got my vote but it surprised me that she asked me exactly what I thought she would. Of course she is voting for McCain too but I was surprised that she asked me who I am voting for :PI voted absentee and yes I am hoping and praying even though I am not 100% Christian that McCain OWNS it because if McCain wins then he won't send our keiki to the wolves in Washington DC while a vote for Obama is a vote to send our keiki to be eaten alive by the wolves in Washington DC.That is an inherent problem with the Republican Party in Hawai'i. IMHO they need to learn how to SPEAK to Hawaiians. While I have been a registered Democrat from 1985 til 2000 then came the Akaka Bill which was created by the Democrats so in 2000 I became a registered Republican. Yes... a registered REPUBLICAN which the local media in Hawai'i tries to portray as mean, nasty, white collar bitches. However "Republican" is not mutually exclusive to any of the aforementioned.For me this is what I would say on behalf of the Republican Party in Hawai'i:"Republicans do not want the Akaka Bill.President Bush was set to VETO the Akaka Bill. Senator McCain strongly opposes the Akaka Bill while Senator Obama supports it.The choice is clear: Between the two Senator McCain is better to Hawaiians while Senator Obama is set to send our keiki to be eaten alive by the wolves and he will also allow them to slit their throat and suck the LIFE out of our keiki.Therefore more Hawaiians should be voting for McCain DESPITE the local media's BIAS and LIES."In my experience Hawaiians understand and are some of THE most reasonable people ever. However it's unfortunate that the media is so powerful in Hawai'i. So powerful that they have some Hawaiians mistakenly believing that Republicans are evil.Then again trust is VERY important to me and while BOTH Democrats AND Republicans did and do our kupuna wrong who plans to send our keiki to be eaten ALIVE by the wolves in Washington DC? You will NOT read this in the local media. However you will hear it from me LOL....Of course I don't want to jinx myself because before I drove to see one of my clients I thought about her asking me who I was voting for and who I think is better for US sure enough she asked me.I know that some other Republicans watch me like a hawk LMAO... but IMHO Republicans in Hawai'i need to learn to SPEAK TO HAWAIIANS. Tell them how they are helping Hawaiians MORE than Democrats are.IMHO if they learned to SPEAK to Hawaiians then more Hawaiians will be like me and realize that the Democrats created the Akaka Bill and are set to send our keiki to be eaten alive by the wolves.They need to LEARN to SPEAK to Hawaiians. I mean really SPEAK to Hawaiians.I know that some people STILL insist on clinging to the Democrats. I don't blame them because the media is very powerful and BIASED in Hawai'i. Ironically those Hawaiians who are voting for Senator Obama are voting to send our keiki to the wolves in Washington DC. The Republican Party should mention this but then it's always the little things that some people forget yet it's the little things that matter.Of course it doesn't help that racist pigs like Senator Sam Slom and Ken Conklin seem to be racist Republicans but not all Republicans are racist pigs. As usual it's the few pilau who reflect POORLY on the rest of us whether it be the Republican party to which I belong... or the Kamehameha Schools where there are SOME alumni who are arrogant and/or who do not help other Hawaiians like we PROMISE to do. It's always the few pilau who reflect POORLY on the rest of us. "Republican" is not mutually exclusive to "racist pig" though. Two racist pigs happen to reflect poorly on Republicans but not ALL Republicans are pilau.Anyway I leave for Las Vegas tomorrow. I'm attending the Kamehameha Schools All Alumni Reunion. I only attend out of respect for my kupuna (oiwi and non-oiwi) who took care of me, fed me, and helped to raise me and out of respect for those people who were kind and compassionate to me when I was super poor and also to make sure that some of us compassionate, non-arrogant, and/or non-SASSY people are represented LOL I hope I see Mrs. Gerry Johansen again. I like to attend to see her and people like her. As in people who epitomize THE legacy of kindness and compassionate to other Hawaiians INCLUDING less fortunate/poor/socio-economically disadvantaged Hawaiians. I'm fortunate that I can afford to go and I do not forget that many cannot afford to go. Then again I NEVER forget that there are still less fortunate Hawaiians out there. Then again money and power bring out more of who you are and whenever I am near others who have some money too I am reminded of this. .


Read more…
kahana2.jpgLingle supports the Akaka Bill because it would help settle the land issue. Right now,Hawaiians have a lot of leverage over what happens to state lands, through the question ofthe legitimacy of title and because when actions such as sales or developments occur onstate land, or on issues of water rights, the constitution provides for a lot of say-so given toHawaiians. Many situations are clouded. The state doesn't like this; it is frustrating to stateinterests. By passing the Akaka Bill and providing for a severely limited form of sovereignty,and a new ConCon to limit OHA's advocacy roll (which is usually hampered anyways becauseof behind the doors deals and business ties) the question of the titles of state lands will beclarified, and the majority of "state" lands will be much more free of influence by Hawaiiansand other anti-development forces.That's what's so funny about the positions of folks like Conklin and the Grassroot group whoare against the bill. Passing the Akaka Bill will actually open the way for more use anddevelopment of state lands. That's what antiHawaiians want anyways. And that's one reasonwhy the sovereignty folks have their spidey senses tingling that there is something wrong.
Read more…


For my family and friends some of whom may end up being haunted by me LOL:

I don't like to talk or discuss politics because politics brings out the best and the WORSE in people. People can and will vote for whomever they want. For example, my twin sister Lisa who is four minutes older than me is voting for Senator Obama while I am voting for Senator McCain. I agree to disagree. Obviously.

Well since the local media in Hawai'i is biased and mistakenly tries to portray Republicans as the devil when BOTH Democrats and Republicans have done and/or do Hawaiians WRONG. For me it's about my kupuna. ALWAYS. Therefore I vote with the person who is more aligned with my values and that person is the one who is strongly AGAINST the Akaka Bill. I also GREW UP being a staunch Democrat and was a Democrat from 1985 to 2000 until the AKAKA BILL which was created by Democrats. I know, I know... many Hawaiians cling onto the Democrats HOPING and trusting them with their lives but in my experience Democrats treat Hawaiians WORSE than Republicans do. The creation of the Akaka Bill by Democrats epitomize this. What a slap to our face. More importantly what a slap to our KUPUNA's face. Therefore I am a Republican. A pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, anti-Akaka Bill, anti-development at La'au Point, and anti-Kau Inoa "Native Hawaiian Registry" Republican. After nearly 15 YEARS of being a Democrat. After nearly 15 YEARS of trusting Democrats only to have them create the Akaka Bill and slap our kupuna in their face. I know, I know... some Hawaiians INSIST on clinging to the Democratic party but the sad reality is that the Republican party while not perfect they are MORE respectful of Hawaiians. IRONIC ISN'T IT? The media in Hawai'i is very powerful and their bias against Republicans epitomizes this.

Some people bitch about Governor Lingle too but little do they know that I wrote a letter to her asking her to please help Baby Ikaika who was an oiwi ice baby NOT fall through the cracks. What did she do? She hooked me up DIRECTLY with the social services director. I know, I know... the media in Hawai'i does not report this because they are BIASED against Republicans when it was Governor Lingle who tried to help me rescue Baby Ikaika. Obviously I despise the local media in Hawai'i because instead of preserving the integrity of journalism they crap on Hawaiians and allow some people to write racist crap about us just to sell more ads. That is so messed up. Not only do they try to portray Hawaiians as though we are less than human... as though we are MONSTERS... they also are biased against Republicans yet who do some Hawaiians insist on believing? The media and Democrats who both slap our kupuna in their FACE and who are preparing to slit our keikis' throat. Yet these Hawaiians INSIST on voting Democrat. Trust is very important to me and while both Republicans AND Democrats did/do our kupuna wrong... Democrats are MUCH WORSE: They created the Akaka Bill. THAT is the epitome of EVIL.
While the biased local media tries to portray Republicans as THE enemy of the Hawaiian people, IMHO it is the Democrats who created the Akaka Bill and Senator Obama strongly SUPPORTS it while Senator McCain strongly OPPOSES it. The reason why I voted for McCain via absentee ballot is obvious: Between the two... who is for or against the Akaka Bill? McCainSTRONGLY opposes the Akaka Bill which is GREAT yet some Hawaiians will vote for the person who will send our keiki to the wolves to be eaten alive! IF and WHEN they are their lives are on YOUR heads and I will NEVER let you folks forget it LOLI know that some people see Senator Obama as a messiah but 12 of Obama's staffers have been caught for voter fraud in Ohio and who uncovered their shadiness?College students:http://www. palestra. net/news/17691Kudos to these college journalists.Of course in Hawai'i the media is biased against Republicans but then who plans to send our keiki to be eaten alive by the wolves in Washington DC? Democrats and not only did they create the Akaka Bill Senator Obama has explicitly stated that he supports the Akaka Bill while Senator McCain has publicly stated that he strongly OPPOSES the Akaka Bill yet some people INSIST on voting for Democrats. Ironically President Bush was set to veto it yet some Hawaiians INSIST on voting Democrat. Of course I was a registered Democrat from 1985 til 2000... until the Akaka Bill showed their TRUE colors and I walked to the Republicans who STRONGLY OPPOSE the Akaka Bill.IF Senator Obama wins this election and WHEN he sends our keiki to the wolves I blame everyone who voted for him. All of the lives of our keiki who will face the WOLVES in Washington DC are on your head. That includes my twin sister Lisa by the way I WILL blame all of you LOL I will also NEVER let you folks live it down and will ALWAYS remind you that it's partly YOUR fault that they will face the wolves in Washington DC.So far I have these people who will be voting or who have voted for McCain via absentee ballot or early voting because unlike Senator Obama whom the media in Hawai'i mistakenly tries to portray as the messiah of the Hawaiian people when he's not. The Democrats CREATED the Akaka Bill and he has explicitly states that he supports it. Fortunately my husband, my brother-in-law, and my cop friend are all voting for Senator McCain who strongly opposes the Akaka Bill. The list so far:- Me- My husband- My brother-in-law- My cop friendIt won't be THEIR fault IF our keiki are sent to be eaten alive by the WOLVES. However I WILL blame everyone of you who vote for Senator Obama. Each and EVERY ONE of you LOLWell here is the transcript:http://www. foxnews. com/story/0,2933,436022,00. html18 total votes from the Obama campaign have been withdrawn.This differs from the McCain camp: One McCain staffer registered while in Ohio... but everyone from the McCain campaign has been cleared.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ohio Revised Code Section 3503. 02, entitled Residence determination rules, which is mysteriously concealed in Title 35, designated Elections, and further concealed in Chapter 3503, labeled Voters -- qualification; registration, states as follows:All registrars and judges of elections, in determining the residence of a person offering to register or vote, shall be governed by the following rules:(A) That place shall be considered the residence of a person in which the person's habitation is fixed and to which, whenever the person is absent, the person has the intention of returning.* * *(C) A person shall not be considered to have gained a residence in any county of this state into which the person comes for temporary purposes only, without the intention of making such county the permanent place of abode.---------------------------------------------------------------------------Like I keep saying... Senator Obama is shady and I HOPE he loses because if he wins he will push for the Democrats' Akaka Bill and our keiki will be sent to be eaten alive by the wolves! Their lives will be on your heads. I will blame each and EVERY one of you til the day that I die... then after I die I will haunt you ALL and NEVER let you forget that it's partly YOUR fault for sending our keiki to the WOLVES in Washington DC :PAnd for all of those people boasting and BRAGGING about Obama and "change" IF Obama is elected and WHEN he sends our keiki to be eaten ALIVE by the wolves in Washington DC our keikis' lives are on YOUR heads. EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU for helping to lead them straight to the WOLVES in Washington DC.Anyway while the polls are showing Senator Obama in the lead (which as those people who know about statistics can be statistically significantly inaccurate) I predict that Senator McCain will take this election. Senator Obama SCARES me MORE than Senator McCain does... for our keiki. I hope and I am praying for Senator McCain to win. That way I KNOW that chances are that like President Bush who was set to veto the Akaka Bill... Senator McCain will veto the Akaka Bill. Unlike Senator Obama, Senator McCain doesn't need "convincing" and there should not be any "convincing" when it comes to our kupuna and our KEIKI. It just IS. That is, you either think about our kupuna and our keiki... or YOU DON'T.


Read more…
Many U.S. settlers in Hawai'i, especially the recent ones within the last 50 years, like to trash the Kanaka Maoli saying they are lazy, on welfare, criminal and derelicts waiting for hand outs. We know this not to be true; yet the character-assassinations continue. Many Hawaiians lived and lives on prime properties that developers are itchy to get their hands on; including the alleged-state of Hawai'i and the U.S. military.Many don't remember Damon Tract, Kalama Valley, Fort Shafter, H-1 Freeway, Salt Lake, Waimea Valley Falls entrance, Makua, Mokapu, Heeia, Vineyard Blvd./ Queen Emma Gardens/Lusitania St., or even Sand Island; this is just a small sample of places on O'ahu that Kanaka Maoli have been evicted and displaced for developers, the alleged-State of Hawai'i and military; and now is attempting to repeat it in Kahana Valley.It's best that the U.S. which continuously violates the laws of occupation, disrespects our neutrality, disregards our treaties and laws, ignores its constitutional laws and the rule of law, scoffs at international laws, commits fraud and deceit, must de-occupy our country, Hawai'i.Tane
Read more…
NEW UPDATE ON KAHANA EVICTONS :6 Kahana families 48 members to be evicted!kahana2.jpg6 Kahana families 48 members to be evicted on 10-27-08 @ 6am this comming monday morning ! the Ohana's have asked family ,friends and "Supporters" to please come to KAHANA ,today10-26-08 4.pm We Will Have Tents Up for potluck /Meeting /Hold Signand PLEASE STAND WITH US MONDAY!Mahalo nui loa me ka ha'aha'aPonoPLEASE KOKUA !DLNR2.jpgHere's some research on Kahana. I've attached a DLNR "facts" letter and notices of eviction. (DLNR sure has been busy...desecration of our iwi kupuna at Naue, depletion of East Maui water, harrasment of kanaka maoli families at Kaena, to Kahana evictions...what else is there?)Here is a HANA HOU article on Kahana that's good. It is followed by a State of Hawaii fact sheet.HANA HOUThe entire bayfront and valley, with only the most minimal intrusion of human habitation, is now owned by the state and managed as a 5,300-acre “living park” called Ahupua‘a ‘O Kahana, but the only signs of this are the parking lot and restrooms across the highway from the beach, tucked in under an old coconut grove that was planted circa 1909. A little ways up Kahana Valley Road is a down-at-the-heels “Orientation Center,” which, sign-less, is closed on a weekday morning. Further inland, the overgrown roadway opens onto a hillside clearing where the gardened plots of a handful of newish houses extend for a few hundred yards.The little subdivision was built after the state’s Department of Land and Natural Resources acquired the valley in 1969 in order to protect the most intact ahupua‘a left on O‘ahu from an ambitious development scheme. The state relocated most of the valley’s thirty-odd resident families (who were, for the most part, the Hawaiian descendants of the valley’s original farmers and fishermen) inland, to this mid-valley settlement. Since then, management of the valley has been an inconclusive tug-of-war between residents and bureaucrats, with little to recommend the well-intentioned transaction except for some measure of security and stability for residents, a few maintained hiking trails, a brochure—and a blissful peace and quiet.Near the new settlement’s entrance, a small trash fire crackles in the middle of a big empty lawn that slopes down to the road. A border of infant plumeria trees and ti plants encloses the plot. At the top of the lawn, at the edge of the forest, an elderly man sits in one of two lawn chairs, watching the smoke rise from his fire. The vacant chair next to the man seems like an invitation, so I walk up the lawn and introduce myself, telling him I’m writing a magazine article about the area. Friendly yet circumspect, he invites me to sit down.George DelaCerna, 72, was born in Kahana Valley, as was his Hawaiian mother. His father, of Spanish descent, was from Maui. A retired superintendent with the refuse division for the City and County of Honolulu (“Good pension!” he exclaims), he lives with his wife and grown daughter, one of seven children, in a substantial house next-door to the empty lot.We chat for awhile, about how he planted and tends this empty lawn though he doesn’t own it; about being stationed in Germany with the U.S. Army during the Korean War; and about the monthly meetings that the lease-holding residents of Kahana have with the state’s landlord bureaucrats.“My wife goes to the meetings,” George says, “but I’m not the type of person who sits in meetings and listens to all what they need to say, because I understand already what it’s all about. I don’t need to hear it again.”The lawn chairs offer a view of much of the valley’s floor and overgrown streambed where there were once abundant taro fields, wauke (paper mulberry), bananas, breadfruit and sweet potatoes. On the other side, the velvety ramparts of its east wall. Near the head of the valley, the dreamy, sculpted 2,265-foot peak of Pu‘u‘ohulehule punctuates the view.One of the wettest spots on O‘ahu, Kahana’s mauka sections absorb more than 250 inches of rain each year. During the first half of the twentieth century, sugar planters engineered an unprecedented network of tunnels and canals into the Ko‘olau mountain spine to capture an average of thirty million gallons of water per day and ship it to the sprawling sugarcane fields that covered the flat, dry leeward plains of O‘ahu like a giant lawn. The on-going water transfer (which now irrigates the thirsty suburbs that replaced the cane fields) has significantly reduced many windward stream flows, including Kahana.The mosquitoes begin to gather, and the conversation lags, so I prepare to take my leave and turn off my palm-sized digital recorder. But George signals that I should sit back down. He isn’t finished and wants to talk. The fire has subsided to glowing embers. I turn the recorder back on.“Actually, what we want, here in the valley, is we want our land back.” His voice firms up. “We don’t want to be controlled by the state the way they’re doing now. We did all right, back when this valley was private. We used to have farmers up here and taro patches, and it was beautiful. The people kept it clean. But then the state came in and said, ‘You can’t do this, you can’t own anything, you can only do this.’ They took the land away from us. They gave us no choice, so to speak. Who are they to do that? They don’t own the land to begin with. It’s ours; it belongs to us, the Hawaiian people.”State of HawaiiFACT SHEETKahana: What Was, What Is, What Can BeHighlightsThe State acquired the ahupua`a `o Kahana in 1969 from the estate of Mary Foster and six individual lessees. The State was prompted to do so by a 1965 report that portrayed Kahana as a blank slate to be developed in a highly commercial way, including 1,000 camping sites, hotel, cabins, restaurant, a botanical garden, a man-made lake, and shops. An additional factor supporting state acquisition was that it was one of the few, if not the only, ahupua`a left under virtually sole ownership and in a relatively pristine state.The families living in Kahana at that time had long-standing ties to the valley, and lobbied the Legislature to allow them to stay in the park and preserve their lifestyle. In 1970, a Governor's Task Force proposed the concept of a "living park," which would allow the residents to remain on the land and be a part of the park.To permit the Kahana residents to remain in the park, the State devised a scheme in which the lessee families would earn the right to a 65-year lease in the park by providing 25 hours of interpretive services per month to the park to preserve, restore, and share Kahana's history and rural lifestyle with the public.The State paid for a number of master plans for Kahana. Taking their tone from the original report, these were extremely ambitious and expensive, and would have involved removing the remaining families still living in Kahana. The community and the legislature rejected these plans. The Kahana residents proposed more modest plans that focused on the rural culture of the ahupua`a, but these were not accepted by the Department of Land and Natural Resources.The Bureau contacted twenty-four state, federal, and county agencies about their jurisdiction over or involvement with Kahana. The agencies fell into three categories: some of the agencies had no involvement in Kahana; some had regulatory powers over proposed changes to the ahupua`a but otherwise were not involved; and others had active jurisdiction over a portion of Kahana and could generate their own projects within their limited jurisdiction. It was agreed that the agency with primary jurisdiction is the Department of Land and Natural Resources' State Parks Division.Two management structures were examined. The first is one in which the management entity has control over the entity, similar to the Kaho`olawe Island Reserve Commission. In the other model, each government agency retains its current jurisdiction and the management entity serves as a coordinator between the agencies and as an ombudsman between the lessees and the agencies.However, discussion of the format of a management agency, whether the control or the coordinator model, and which specific entity should be that manager, is premature at this time as there is a crucial but missing element which must be done first: Kahana must have a master plan.A management entity will not be able to function efficiently and effectively, or be evaluated appropriately, without a master plan. A master plan for Kahana, co-authored by the Kahana lessees, is urgently needed before a change in management should be made. If an entire master plan is not financially feasible at this time, a specific phased plan could be started immediately to deal with the three most-pressing issues relating to Kahana. The first is community-building between the lessees, and between the lessees as a group and State Parks to address the friction that is blocking full participation by every involved person in making the ahupua`a `o Kahana a true living park. The second is a specific plan to address interpretive service and lease issues; and the third is development of a full set of goals for Kahana to use in directing interpretive service hours and in seeking assistance from other governmental agencies.Funding for a plan for Kahana, whether it be a full master plan or a more focused phased plan, should be among the Department of Land and Natural Resources' top priorities. However, a plan for Kahana will only be effective if the lessees, who are required to be the main source of staffing via their interpretive services, are co-architects of the plan.Until a master plan is in place, deciding who the management entity should be, or the scope of its powers, is premature.Anticipated QuestionsQ: What about Kahana makes it different from other state parks?A: Kahana differs from all other state parks as it is an intact ahupua`a – the basic ancient Hawaiian land division – and can demonstrate all of the resources – mountain, upland, shoreline, and ocean – that the ancient Hawaiians used for survival. Kahana is also unique in its "living park" arrangement with lessees whose ancestors have lived on the land and who can serve as the stewards of the land and interpreters of Kahana's rural culture.Q: Why should funding its master plan be a priority?A: The State took full possession of Kahana in 1969 and attempted several master plans in the ensuing decades. All the plans were rejected as they were too grandiose. Meanwhile, the kūpuna of Kahana, who suggested more modest but ignored plans that would have restored and displayed the traditional nature and culture of Kahana, are passing away. Also, the relationship between the lessees and State Parks has suffered due to the long delay in devising a master plan. Action is needed now to utilize the wisdom of the remaining kūpuna, support those lessees who are striving to restore Kahana, and encourage those who need guidance and motivation.
Saturday, October 25, 2008 Honolulu Advertiser

State Evicting Some Residents From Kahana Valley Cultural Park

Residents say flawed laws hurting those with ancestral ties

KAHANA — After living in Kahana Valley for generations, families that once fought the state for the right to stay there — and won — now face eviction on Monday.

The 5,280-acre Ahupua'a 'O Kahana State Park is a cultural living park where families provide 25 hours a month of cultural activities for visitors and do other work in exchange for a lease to live there.

But after 30 years, the living cultural aspect of the park is being questioned and some who once were told they could have a lease are being pushed out. Residents said poor planning by the state Department of Land and Natural Resources and flawed laws are at fault.

Sunny Greer, a Kahana Valley resident who is not being evicted, said failure to comply with Western law and rules is forcing people out and creating a divide-and-conquer atmosphere.

"They want us out," Greer said. "They're picking on each and every one of us until there's not any one of us left. What hurts me is, that for which our ancestors a generation ago worked so hard for, the long-term leases, has now divided us. We're waiting for someone to default (in order to get their lease)."

Greer said the state is trying to use Western law to govern Hawaiian culture, and the two don't mix.

DLNR declined to comment but did provide a written statement about the eviction.

It said six families must leave the park because they do not have residential leases or permits to live there. A law that provided for long-term leases there expired in 1993 and no new leases can be issued, DLNR said. Final notice was posted Wednesday.

"This is in keeping with the public park purpose that would be impacted by an expanded residential subdivision in the park," said Laura H. Thielen, DLNR chairwoman. "With the enactment of Act 5 by the state Legislature in 1987, the state sought to accommodate families with ties to Kahana, but it was not the intent of the state or Legislature to provide housing for all those in future generations.

"If new lots were permitted, ultimately the park would be displaced by a subdivision. We are seeking a balance between the public's use of Kahana as a park with the desire of families to reside here," she said.

lacking a master plan

Many questioned the state's resolve in creating a living park for the public.

Greer said the key to the park's success is a master plan, but the state hasn't created one and did nothing with the one produced by residents in 1985.

"I don't think there was much thought or even much good-faith effort in fulfilling this living aspect of this cultural living park," she said. "There seems to be more emphases on parks and not the living aspect."

Four years ago, the state evicted a family from the shore of Kahana Bay saying it wanted to provide more park space, said Thoran Evans, who is being evicted. But the land is chained off, overgrown with weeds and a dumping ground for trash, Evans said.

DLNR operates the park piecemeal with inconsistent rules that don't seem to apply to everyone equally, he complained.

Evans had been trying to regain a family lease that was under his sister's name. She was unable to get financing and was behind in the number of hours she was required to work, he said. Apparently the state sent her a letter revoking her lease, but she never received it, he said. Evans said that when he called the state, he learned the letter was sitting on someone's desk, never opened.

"I don't understand why they took it away in the beginning," he said. "My family wasn't notified. If we were notified we were in trouble with the lease, we would do whatever is possible to get caught up."

Evans said his family has tried to meet the monthly work requirement but there are few activities to work on. Some families do maintenance to fulfill the requirement, but when his family asked for the same opportunity, it was denied, he said.

"I felt really discriminated against," Evans said. "Our family, no matter what we tried to do, we're just pushed aside for some reason."

Each family is being evicted for various reasons, said Ervin Kahala, who was told in 2000 that he would get a lease, but earlier this year learned that a new interpretation of the law forbids the state from issuing new leases even though he grew up in the valley and has ancestral ties to it.

"I'm not prejudiced but (the state) is using white man's law as an excuse," Kahala said.

Act 5 provisions

The law he referred to is Act 5, adopted by the state Legislature in 1987 that set up the living park concept and provided 31 leases to families who could prove they had a history there. DLNR took six years to finalize the leases but no provisions were made for extended family.

Kahala said he spent thousands of dollars preparing the land, acquiring blueprints and getting paperwork in order. He and Evans said they were both promised leases and there are leases available out of the original 31.

Some 30 people will be evicted, and some residents said their departure will create safety problems. They said many of those affected live in a flood plain in the lower valley where they are the eyes and ears of the community. They live near the entrance and make sure the grass is trimmed and children are visible to drivers.

Charmaine Kahala, Ervin Kahala's sister-in-law who lives in the valley but is not being evicted, said she sent a letter to the state asking it to reconsider its eviction. She predicted the grass would grow long, homeless people would move in, drugs would become an issue and state buildings in the lower section would be subject to vandalism.

"I'm not fighting the eviction," she said, but she wanted assurance that children would be safe. The state did not respond to her letter, she said.

Jessica Wooley, an attorney running as a Democrat for state representative in the 47th District, which includes Kahana, said she also wrote a letter asking the state to hold off on the evictions and to meet with her. Wooley said she had represented another family in the valley and helped them keep their lease.

"I'm sure that the families haven't been perfect, but the way that it's set up right now, it's not workable," she said. "The laws that were passed to deal with the land over there are old and they need to be revised.

"The state pushing forward with eviction right now shows a total lack of compassion and responsibility on the state's part."

Reach Eloise Aguiar at eaguiar@honoluluadvertiser.com.

Read more…
In a little over a week, there’s one small thing you can do if you live in Hawai`i that will make a big difference.Vote out all Office of Hawaiian Affairs trustees running for re-election.If you need a good reminder why, check out Free Hawai`i TV this coming Wednesday as we recap the unethical and downright dishonest behavior that has come to characterize OHA. Remember, your influence counts, so use it this November 4th.And speaking of influence, we bring you three role models who use their own influence for good this week on Voices Of Truth – One-On-One With Hawai`i’s Future.MONDAY, October 27th At 6:30 PM Maui – Akaku, Channel 53THURSDAY, October 30th At 8:30 PM & FRIDAY, October 31st At 8:30 AM Kaua`i – Ho`ike, Channel 52“Hawaiian Superman – Remembering Kanalu Young”Superman really does exist. Kanalu was not only quadriplegic, but professor of Hawaiian history at the University of Hawai`i and Director of the Masters Program at the Center For Hawaiian Studies. See for yourself why this remarkable Kanaka Maoli warrior was Hawai`i’s Superman. Watch It Here.MONDAY, October 27th At 7:00 PM & FRIDAY, October 31st At 5:30 PM - Hawai`i Island – Na Leo, Channel 53“Nothing Can Grow There – A Visit With Kat Brady”Why are so many Hawaiians behind bars and being shipped out to privately run US prisons in Arizona and Kentucky? Did you know more than half of Hawai`i’s prison population is now on the US continent? You’ll be shocked when you hear why. Discover why Kat says, “the government’s not going to fix these things – it will be the people.” Watch It Here.SATURDAY, November 1st At 8:00 PM O`ahu, `Olelo, Channel 53“Under Our Own Power – A Visit with Henry Curtis”What would life be like if we created all our own power? Did you know Hawai`i was a world leader in this before the overthrow? Could we set the example for the rest of the world again in clean, affordable, sustainable energy? Hear why Henry Curtis of Life Of The Land says it’s possible – and sooner than you may think. Watch It Here.Voices Of Truth interviews those creating a better future for Hawai`i to discover what made them go from armchair observers to active participants. We hope you’ll be inspired to do the same.If you support our issues on the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network, please email this to a friend to help us continue. A donation today helps further our work. Every single penny counts.Donating is easy on our Voices Of Truth website via PayPal.You can watch Voices Of Truth anytime on the web.And for news and issues that affect you, watch Free Hawai`i TV, a part of the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network.
Read more…

kuu hoa

Ok, normalmente devo escrever em havaiano...por exemplo:Ke kakau nei au i keia ma ka olelo HI, pili ana i ko'u hoa, ka makana no na aumakua, no na tini akua, o Micio (Laka) kona inoa.Mas, eu prefero escrever em português (atualmente eu odio escrever em outras línguas) pq eu sei que posso expressar minhas emoções melhor no idioma português do que havaiano.Na 2da feira ua haalele (saiu) minha gatinha que tive 16 anos. Ela foi minha grande amiga, minha família, e ela me acompanhou pra tudo na minha vida. Eu econtrei ela no fim de semana de Ação de Graça 1992. Ela foi velha, tem renais que não funcionava bem e muita magra pq não comia muito.Quando penso em ela, eu lembro muito que aconteceu desde econtrei ela. O foi o mesmo ano de LA RIOTS. Shit, remember that? Mais que 1 ano depois, estamos no terremoto NORTHRIDGE em 1994 quando moramos com minha prima Paula em Castaic. Depois saímos a Glendale onde consegui Nicodemus e Piilani. Ela tava comigo quando saí BPS em 1993, saí Crosby Heafy Roach & May em 1997, saí Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy em 2001, quando morreu meu pai, quando Pii e Nicodemus morreram, quando consegui o Tokra e Lucas, quando morreu meu grande amigo Tom, quando os primos de mim (Shan e Nanette) moravam comigo, quando foi despedido pelo FTI (fucking assholes), quando consegui 2 carros, um em 1993 e o outro 2006. Shit there were so many things we went through together. Graças a deuses pra ela! E hao ana wau iaia!DSCF2529
Read more…


For my family and friends who know how blunt I can be. Everyone who knows me already knows that I am strongly anti-Akaka Bill, anti-Kau Inoa "Native Hawaiian Registration" Program, and anti-development at La'au Point and PRO-choice and PRO-gay marriage. Also my husband stated it best... that some people are more concerned about their resumes than they are about Hawaiian children and/or helping other Hawaiians. I agree with him. Fortunately there are exceptions like Mrs. Gerry Johansen who GENUINELY cares about other Hawaiians more than about her "resume." Props to her and people like her for dat. For me it comes down to my kupuna (and their/our mo'opuna.) ALWAYS. Irrelevant of what other people think about me *LOL* No one else's opinion(s) of me matters to me. I ONLY "answer" to my kupuna and only care what THEY think about me. Obviously.I know that the local media is biased. They have tried to portray us Hawaiians as MONSTERS. As though we are less than human. Their bias against Hawaiians does not surprise me. They also try to portray Republicans as evil, greedy, and RUDE. Yes SOME Republicans are evil, greedy, and RUDE but a few Republicans' actions do not conflate to ALL Republicans. I am also PRO-choice and PRO-gay marriage. I am not the ONLY Republican who thinks this way but it does NOT surprise me how the local media tries to TWIST information in favor of Obama when Obama is the ONE who is preparing to send OUR KEIKI to be eaten ALIVE by the WOLVES.What surprises me is how some Hawaiians are voting for Senator Obama. They RAVE about him when ironically a vote for Obama is a vote to send our keiki to be eaten alive by WOLVES:http://starbulletin.com/2008/01/22/news/story05.htmlWhen I tell some people that I am voting for McCain. Actually I voted for him already via absentee ballot but it's not a surprise considering that he strongly opposes the Akaka Bill and WON'T send our keiki to be eaten alive by WOLVES:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26633576/IRONICALLY President Bush was set to veto the Akaka Billhttp://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20080405/NEWS01/804050341/-1/SPECIALOBAMA08Ironically some Hawaiians bitched about President Bush yet he was set to STOP our keiki from being eaten alive by the wolves.Ironically some Hawaiians still will vote for Senator Obama.Ironically they will also be sending our poor keiki to be eaten alive by the WOLVES.Ironically it's President Bush and Senator McCain who are anti-Akaka Bill which IMHO is why I think more Hawaiians SHOULD be voting for Senator McCain.Ironically some know this yet they STILL vote for Senator Obama. The very one who will send our keiki to be eaten ALIVE by the WOLVES.Ironically a vote for Senator Obama is a vote FOR the Akaka Bill... the very thing that will send our keiki to be eaten ALIVE by the WOLVES.Yet some Hawaiians INSIST on voting for Senator Obama as though he is the messiah... for the Hawaiian people. No.. he's NOT the messiah for the Hawaiian people. He supports the Akaka Bill which clearly shows that he will send our keiki to the WOLVES in Washington DC.Well when our keiki are eaten ALIVE by the wolves THEY are partly to blame and yes I blame THEM if and WHEN our keiki are eaten alive by the WOLVES in WASHINGTON DC I. BLAME ALL OF THEM FOR ALLOWING IT TO HAPPEN.I blame EACH and EVERY Hawaiian who votes for Senator Obama. If and when they are eaten ALIVE by the WOLVES in WASHINGTON DC... our keiki-s' lives in the hands of the WOLVES in Washington DC are on YOUR HEADS.So while boasting about "Change" now... later on IF Obama wins this election and he pushes for the Akaka Bill like the other Devil-crats do... then our keiki-s' lives in the hands of the WOLVES in Washington DC are on YOUR HEADS since YOU helped send them there.As for intra-Hawaiian relations, * SOME of my personal choices for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs in no particular order and chosen for their fairness and REASON and for their respect for our kupuna and/or for the iwi which are VERY important to me:Terry KekoolaniPaul deSilva (non-oiwi)Lehua KalimaManu BoydKehaulani WatsonTodd ApoEhu CardellNainoa ThompsonKekuewa KikiloiLynn Maunakea (non-oiwi)Leona KalimaPatrick KawaiolaWalter RitteBumpy KanaheleJust to name a few ;)Conversely I do not want Haunani Apoliona speaking for me. I think she does a disservice to ALL Hawaiians by not taking her fiduciary duty as a single agent representative seriously and lacks LOYALTY and OBEDIENCE to HAWAIIANS which are required of single agents. She also seems to lack FULL disclosure which is shady. I do not want the power hungry people and/or people who abuse their power when they have the lives of thousands of Hawaiians in their hands. Instead I want NEW blood in there who will have the lives of thousands of Hawaiians in their hands, RESPECT their LIVES instead of laughing at them and/or IGNORING them, and who share my mana'o that EVERY HAWAIIAN MATTERS. IMHO Apoliona's actions are diametrically opposed to this.*This is not a conclusive list nor should it be construed as conclusive. This is just a few of those people who I personally want on the board at the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.* For those whom I have mentioned it CAN be construed that I think highly of these people in some way. Trust is VERY important to me. To me it is a very high compliment for ME to think highly of ANYone LOL... because I am not easily impressed :P

Read more…

DO FOREIGN COUNTRIES RECOGNIZE A FREE HAWAI`I ?

Since 1842, the Hawaiian Kingdom entered into treaties with major nations of the world and had established over ninety consulates in those countries, including the US.The Hawaiian Kingdom in fact had a consulate in San Francisco and an embassy in Washington, DC until the illegal overthrow of Queen Lili`uokalani by the US.Here Are Just A Few Countries That Recognized The Independence Of Hawai`i -Austria-Hungary in 1875Belgium in 1862Denmark in 1846France 1846 and 1857Germany in 1879Great Britain in 1836, 1846 and 1851Italy in 1863Japan in 1871 and 1886Netherlands in 1862Portugal in 1882Russia in 1869Samoa in 1887Spain in 1863Swiss Confederation in 1864Sweden and Norway in 1852United States in 1849, 1870, 1875, 1883, 1884To This Day Not One Of These Treaties Has Ever Been Officially Repudiated!Another Reason The Hawaiian Kingdom Still Exists
Read more…

My Day at the Beach!

Aloha Kaukou! We were going to the Beach sometime in November 2007 and in November was my best friends birthday. And at the exact same time that was happening we were supposed to go to the beach with my family and it was a bit hard to choose witch one to go to. And well we decided to go to my friends birthday since it doesn't come around everyday and we always go to the beach with my family so we decided to go to the birthday, UNTIL we found out that my auntie was going to the beach and that's not an every day and neither was the birthday. It wasn't easy deciding so I came up with a solution to go to the beach with my family for a half hour then go to the party. But we lost track of time and we accidentally stay one hour whole instead of half an hour. Then my brother kihapiilani really wanted to stay and so did I so how could I resist? So we stayed and had a great time!THEEND
Read more…
Learn more about the Kahana eviction struggle. We've got special coverage at The Hawaii Independent. Na maka o Kahana And the news coverage... We'll be at the BLNR tomorrow morning. Check the Events section for more information.
Read more…