All Posts (6434)

Sort by

Walmart, Sears and a Mass Grave in Bangladesh

 logo.jpg
company_logo.jpg

ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Cheap clothes!

Their cost, it turns out, is beyond calculation.

“Babul Mia said he identified his wife Mariam Begum, 25, who was apparently burnt beyond recognition, but he could identify her bangles and her small teeth,” reported Bangladesh’s main English-language newspaper, The Daily Star.

“Zahera Begum, who worked on the fifth floor of Tazreen Fashions, too, was identified by her husband Iqramul from her nose ring, bangles and necklace.”

So a fire swept through a sweatshop in Bangladesh on Nov. 24, killing at least 112 people, nearly half of whom were unidentifiable and buried in a mass grave. The sweatshop, which produced brand-name garments for major retail outlets such as Walmart and Sears, has been described as a deathtrap: It lacked working fire extinguishers and external fire escapes; one of the exit doors was locked; and, oh yeah, when the fire alarm first went off, the bosses told everyone to go back to their sewing machines.

“Had there been at least one emergency exit through outside the factory, the casualties would have been much lower,” the local fire department operations director said.

The fire — only the most recent such horror in a Bangladesh or other Third World sweatshop — was eerily similar to the famous Triangle Shirtwaist fire on New York’s Lower East Side a century earlier, an iconic event in the union movement that sparked major changes in working conditions throughout the country. Workers then were also trapped by locked exit doors; 146 of them died on March 25, 1911.

Interestingly, I did not see this obvious comparison drawn in most mainstream coverage of the Bangladesh fire, perhaps because, as Robert Oak put it at Economic Populist, “we’ve outsourced our history of worker exploitation and lack of safe work environments along with American jobs.”

Apparently, this discussion is still off the table. We don’t want to reopen the class warfare thing or look too critically at the global economic system. The problem belongs to Bangladesh, which is notoriously lax about worker safety, especially in the garment industry, where 4,000 factories produce $20 billion in export revenue thanks to a heartless work ethic that’s no longer so easy to maintain in the United States.

“The 25-year-old worker said whenever the fire alarm goes off, the on-duty supervisors stop them from leaving the building.” This is the Daily Star again, interviewing garment workers in other factories. “‘They always say it is nothing serious and that they will check it. The supervisors don’t want to halt the production for even a single moment.’

“Some workers said they sometimes have to work up to 24 hours at a stretch, but they are forced to tell the buyers that they work from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. every day. ‘If any worker tells buyers or their representatives about the actual working condition, he is either dismissed or fined,’ said a worker.”

Meanwhile, the big multinationals that get their cheap goods from Bangladesh are — big surprise — distancing themselves from Tazreen Fashions, the sweatshop where the fire occurred.

The notoriously exploitative Walmart, currently beset by workers’ strikes in 100 U.S. cities, has said it wasn’t supposed to be purchasing garments from this particular sweatshop because of its unsafe conditions, but a supplier had subcontracted work there without the company’s authorization.

On Monday Walmart announced it had dumped that supplier, adding: “The fact that this occurred is extremely troubling to us, and we will continue to work across the apparel industry to improve fire safety education and training in Bangladesh.”

In other words, this is mainly Third World ignorance operating here. Bangladesh factory operators need to learn to tell their foremen that when fire alarms go off, the workers should be allowed to exit the building and maybe exit doors shouldn’t be locked and, while you’re at it, let them organize trade unions and pay them more than 3,000 takas ($38) a month. No, wait, skip those last two items.

In point of fact, Walmart and other multinationals have a whole world of cheap labor they can exploit, and they are far more likely to leave a supplier in the lurch, or abandon a whole country, if they can’t get their goods dirt cheap — if wages rise, if meddlesome government regulations start requiring factories to create humane working conditions. It is a ruthless profit squeeze that has created workers’ hell in Bangladesh and elsewhere, and that guarantees more fires and grotesque death tolls in coming months and years.

Walmart’s “culpability is enormous,” Scott Nova, director of the Workers Rights Consortium, told Josh Eidelson of The Nation. As the largest buyer from Bangladesh, “they make the market.”

The problem isn’t the ruthless inhumanity of Walmart execs so much as an economic system in the thrall of profit. As David Korten has written, “The economy’s only valid purpose is to serve life.” We’re trapped in a perversion of this, an economic system that serves scarcity, indifference and our own demise. But we can get brand names cheap.

---

Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally syndicated writer. His new book, Courage Grows Strong at the Wound (Xenos Press) is now available. Contact him at koehlercw@gmail.com, visit his website at commonwonders.com or listen to him at Voices of Peace radio.

 

***************************************

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74NCfS3h2JY

Read more…

PLDC CREATION A SLAP IN THE FACE

By Gary Hooser

The Public Land Development Corp. (PLDC) was created by the Legislature in a manner that at best was unprincipled and at worst corrupt and illegal.


Those responsible owe the people of our state first an apology and then a complete repeal.


Senate Bill 1555, which became Act 55 and created the PLDC, was introduced in the Senate on Jan. 26, 2011. Initially, while establishing a quasi-independent development corporation intended to maximize the development and revenue generation of public lands, SB1555 did not contain broad exemptions from land-use laws. Also, when first introduced, the original PLDC board included full neighbor-island representation.


As if by design, on March 18, 2011, after sailing through the Senate with only minor amendments and no controversy, the House Water, Land and Ocean Resources Committee (http://tinyurl.com/ dyg32jn) inserted the exemption provisions and stripped away neighbor- island representation on the PLDC board.


The only opportunity for public input in response to these critical amendments was on April 7, 2011, in the House Finance Committee (http://tinyurl.com/d4ujr97). It was here that Finance Chairman Marcus Oshiro, with the approval of Speaker of the House Calvin Say, waived the normal 48-hour public notice rule and gave Hawaii residents only 115 minutes public notice to offer their mana‘o on a measure that could dramatically accelerate the development of public lands statewide.

These two maneuvers, executed quite deftly by the House, enabled the measure to reach the all-important joint conference committee without incurring any serious public scrutiny.

Once in "conference" where public testimony is not allowed, the final work on the establishment of the PLDC was a fait accompli.

The Legislature passed out SB1555, HD2, CD1 on May 5, 2011, which created the PLDC, took away "home rule" from the counties and granted the PLDC and its private partners extraordinary powers over the development of public lands.

They made the development of public lands exempt from all county zoning, planning and land use laws, gave all of the power to control this development to three appointees of the governor and took away all neighbor-island representation on the PLDC board.

Along the way, the House Finance Committee said effectively: "Oh, by the way, if you don't like it you have 115 minutes to get down to the Capitol and provide testimony — and if you live in Puna, Hana or Kekaha … too bad...."

The House Finance Committee essentially thumbed its nose at the Constitution and at the general public — claiming it held a public meeting yet making it impossible for the majority of the public to attend, or in fact to even know that the meeting was being held.

The legislative history of the PLDC represents a shameful and incredibly arrogant attitude of entitlement by many at the Legislature. The public is seen as a bothersome impediment and rules are seen as obstacles to be circumvented whenever possible....

It is no wonder people are outraged and demanding a repeal.

Read more…

FREE HAWAI`I TV - "IN RETREAT & FACING DEFEAT"

FREE HAWAI`I TV
THE FREE HAWAI`I BROADCASTING NETWORK


"IN RETREAT & FACING DEFEAT"

 

Heʻs Having Second Thoughts, Now That His Plans Are Coming To Naught. 

 

The Oppositionʻs On A Mission Which Is PLDC Abolition. 

 

Itʻs Neat Heʻs Feeling The Heat, But Donʻt Stop Until This Defeat Is Complete. 

 

So Watch This To See Why Their Worst Fears Are Becoming Real & Hawaiian Kingdom Lands They Might Not After All Be Able To Steal.

 
Then Share This Video With One Other Person Today.

 

Read more…

WHAT IS LA KU`OKO`A - INDEPENDENCE DAY IN HAWAI`I?

In the Kingdom of Hawai`i, November 28 was an official holiday called Lā Kū`oko`a, or Independence Day. This was the day in 1843 when England and France formally recognized Hawai`i's independence.

Faced with the problem of foreign encroachment of Hawaiian territory, His Majesty King Kamehameha III deemed it prudent and necessary to dispatch a Hawaiian delegation to the United States and then to Europe, with the power to negotiate treaties and to ultimately secure the recognition of Hawaiian Independence by the major powers of the world.

In accordance with this view, Timoteo Ha`alilio, William Richards and Sir George Simpson were commissioned as joint Ministers Plenipotentiary on April 8, 1842.

Sir George Simpson, shortly thereafter, left for England, via Alaska and Siberia, while Mr. Ha`alilio and Mr. Richards departed for the United States, via Mexico and the US on July 8, 1842.


The Hawaiian delegation, while in the United States of America, secured the assurance of US President Tyler on December 19, 1842 of its recognition of Hawaiian independence, and then proceeded to meet Sir George Simpson in Europe and secure formal recognition by Great Britain and France.

On March 17, 1843, King Louis-Phillipe of France recognized Hawaiian independence at the urging of King Leopold of Belgium, and on April 1, 1843, Lord Aberdeen on behalf of Her Britannic Majesty Queen Victoria, assured the Hawaiian delegation that:


"Her Majesty's Government was willing and had determined to recognize the independence of the Sandwich Islands under their present sovereign."

Formal Agreement of Recognition -

On November 28, 1843, at the Court of London, the British and French Governments entered into a formal agreement of the recognition of Hawaiian independence, with what is called the Anglo-Franco Proclamation.

To wit-


"Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and His Majesty the King of the French, taking into consideration the existence in the Sandwich Islands (Hawaiian Islands) of a government capable of providing for the regularity of its relations with foreign nations, have thought it right to engage, reciprocally, to consider the Sandwich Islands as an Independent State, and never to take possession, neither directly or under the title of Protectorate, or under any other form, of any part of the territory of which they are composed.

The undersigned, Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs, and the Ambassador Extraordinary of His Majesty the King of the French, at the Court of London, being furnished with the necessary powers, hereby declare, in consequence, that their said Majesties take reciprocally that engagement.

In witness whereof the undersigned have signed the present declaration, and have affixed thereto the seal of their arms.

Done in duplicate at London, the 28th day of November, in the year of our Lord, 1843.
[L.S.] Aberdeen [L.S.] St. Aulaire"

The Fake Revolution -

Fifty years later, in 1893, an illegal intervention by the U.S. military resulted in a "fake revolution" against the legitimate Hawaiian government, and a puppet oligarchy set itself up with its main purpose of annexing Hawai`i to the United States.

After a failed armed attempt by Hawaiians to retake their Kingdom in 1895, the usurpers announced that Lā Kū`oko`a would no longer be celebrated, and the American holiday Thanksgiving Day would be the official national holiday instead.

Removing a holiday like Hawai`i Independence Day was a way to cover up and try to destroy the history and identity of the Hawaiian Kingdom and its people.

At first Hawaiians protested and celebrated Lā Kū`oko`a anyway, telling the story of the national heroes who had traveled to Europe to secure Hawaii's recognition.

But over time, this history — knowledge of the holiday and how it was replaced — faded and was almost lost, until recently, when Hawaiian language scholars started translating Hawaiian language newspapers and rediscovered the story.


Tomorrow’s celebration of Lā Kū`oko`a asserts that Hawai`i is still an independent nation, even under prolonged illegal occupation.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read more…


"Dedicated To Hawaiians - A Visit With Anton Krucky"

When Anton Krucky told his mother he was thinking of switching careers, she questioned his plans reminding him he was already successful in the engineering field. But Anton had other desires which included helping improve the lives of his fellow Hawaiians. Today, heʻs not only CEO of a very successful bio-tech company dedicated to amazing medical advances, but also contributing to the Hawaiian community in life-changing ways. Donʻt miss our visit with Anton and you too will see why heʻs so dedicated to Hawaiians - Watch It Here

 

MONDAY, November 26th At 5:30 PM O`ahu - `Olelo, Channel 53

MONDAY, November 26th At 6:30 PM Maui – Akaku, Channel 53
MONDAY, November 26th At 7:00 PM & FRIDAY, November 30th At 5:30 PMHawai`i Island – Na Leo, Channel 53
TUESDAY, November 27th At 7:30 PM, THURSDAY, November 29th At 7:30 PM & SATURDAY, December 1st At 8:00 PM - Kaua`i - Ho`ike, Channel 52

 

Sneak Peek!

"They Said No - A Visit With Lynette Cruz"


It was back in 1897 after the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom Government  when 98% of all Hawaiian Kingdom Nationals alive at the time signed a monster petition protesting the annexation of Hawai`i to the US. History was made when that petition, carried to the floor of the US Congress, caused the treaty of annexation to fail. Recently the names on those petitions were brought back to Washington, DC in a dramatic, two-day display on the National Mall. Donʻt miss our amazing visit with Lynette Cruz as we walk amongst thousands of those ancestors and discover the powerful message they still have for all of us today - Watch It Here

SATURDAY, December 1st At 8:00 PM
O`ahu - `Olelo, Channel 53

Now you can become a fan of Voices Of Truth on Facebook by clicking Here and see behind the scenes photos of our shows and a whole lot more.  

Voices Of Truth interviews those creating a better future for Hawai`i to discover what made them go from armchair observers to active participants. We hope you'll be inspired to do the same.
 

Voices Of Truth now airs on local access stations in over 70 cities across the US and throughout the world. Check your local listings.
 

If you support our issues on the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network, please email this to a friend to help us continue. A donation today helps further our work. Every single penny counts.
 

Donating is easy on our Voices Of Truth website via PayPal where you can watch Voices Of Truth anytime.
 

For news and issues that affect you, watch Free Hawai`i TV, a part of the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network.
 

Please share our Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network videos with friends and colleagues. That's how we grow. Mahalo.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read more…

Hawaii Governor Wants To Make Peace With Groups Opposing PLDC

By Sophie Cocke11/23/2012

Sophie Cocke/ Civil Beat

Gov. Neil Abercrombie has asked the Public Land Development Corporation to take a break while a top administration official meets with critics to try to placate mounting concerns about the agency.

At a press conference the day after Thanksgiving, the governor announced that William Aila, chair of the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, will be meeting with stakeholders to address objections to proposed rules to govern the agency. Aila, who stood by the governor's side Friday, is also on the board of the PLDC.

Aila said that some of the groups he will meet with include labor unions, the Hawaii Farm Bureau, the Association of Hawaiian Civic Clubs, the Surfrider Foundation and the Sierra Club. He said that the process is expected to take a month or two.

Loading ImageProxy.mvc?bicild=&canary=0PIDDDJtgEsQWSiFnz50G8w7nzw6JGz0qy6d7X0Rrik%3d0&url=http%3a%2f%2fd22c3hi90fg43e.cloudfront.net%2fimages%2fxhr_indicator_content.gif

The PLDC, which announced earlier in the day that it had canceled its next board meeting, was in the process of approving rules to govern the agency. Draft rules have gone out twice for public hearings and been met largely with criticism. During the first round of hearings this summer, nearly 700 people came out to register their opposition to the PLDC, which acts as a development arm of DLNR.

But abolishing the PLDC won't be on the agenda in the upcoming meetings.

"Most of the testimony that we received during this process was repeal, repeal, repeal," said Aila. "We don't have the ability to address that."

The Abercrombie administration as well as the board of the PLDC is required to carry out the legislative intent of the agency, which was created last year. Attempts to repeal the agency or restrict its powers must be brought up this legislative session, which begins in mid-January. Aila will be meeting with groups that commented specifically on how they would like to see the rules amended.

Abercrombie said that he hoped addressing uneasiness about the rules could stave off a repeal.

"I think much of the idea about repeal is because there were not rules," said Abercrombie. "Nobody knew how it was going to work. That's the whole idea of having the rule making process. So it might be that once that becomes clear, where there is not a vacuum as to how the legislation would be implemented, where there's no longer that vacuum, it may be those concerns are sufficiently addressed."

The PLDC is tasked with enlisting the help of private companies to develop public lands and shore up aging public infrastructure. Abercrombie has said that the agency, which can bypass county zoning rules, could help revamp the dilapidated Waikiki Natatorium, refurbish aging public schools and revitalize fallow agricultural lands in central Oahu.

But the PLDC has had a tough time moving forward and has not carried out any projects. It's executive director and board have been working on rules to govern the agency for nearly a year.

It could be difficult to stop lawmakers from repealing or restricting the powers of the PLDC. The county councils on the Big Island, Kauai and Maui have passed resolutions urging the Legislature to repeal the agency. An increasing number of lawmakers have come out in opposition to the PLDC, warning that it doesn't provide adequate environmental controls and could lead to backroom deals with developers. And a shake-up in the leadership of the state House means that bills addressing the concerns over the PLDC will likely get a full hearing this year.

House Speaker Calvin Say, who has supported the PLDC, appears to have been ousted from more than a decade in that job. Earlier this week, Rep. Joe Souki, who is from Maui, announced that he had the 28 votes needed to make him speaker. Members of the House won't officially elect a speaker until the session opens Jan. 16.

And Senate President Shan Tsutsui has already said that he plans to introduce bills that both repeal and restrict the powers of the PLDC.

Despite, the heated rhetoric and growing political opposition toward the PLDC, Abercrombie said he hoped that upcoming meetings with critics will help quell the call for repeal.

"I don't want a good thing that could happen to be lost because we in turn get lost in the weeds of confrontation and accusations that don't really accomplish anything," he said. "That's unproductive. It's ill-advised and unproductive. I'm saying let's take time now in order to make time count."

Read more…

PLDC IN DENIAL

Honolulu Weekly - November 21, 2012

 

By Joan Conrow

 

As the Public Land Development Corp. considers a set of revised rules for its activities, citizens are keeping up a drumbeat to repeal Act 55, which created the controversial agency.

 

The issue is shaping up as a conflict between those who view the PLDC as a tool for stimulating the economy, and those who see it as a means for accelerating development with little oversight by the public and government agencies.

 

“When you look at countries like Spain, Greece, what they’re going through, ladies and gentleman, I think it’s really clear that we have to be looking toward opportunity and not knocking something that hasn’t even presented its first project,” said Shannon Alivado, testifying to the PLDC board Nov. 13 on behalf of the General Contractors Assn.

 

Jocelyn Doane, senior public policy advocate for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, said the revised rules fail to address concerns that OHA and others raised in the first round of hearings. 

 

“There’s been little change in the rules that would ensure transparency, due diligence and accountability in PLDC projects, community input on proposals carried out by PLDC, . . . consultation with applicable agencies . . . and cultural sensitivity for all projects,” Doane testified.

 

Gary Hooser, who is on leave from his post as director of the Office of Environmental Quality Control and was just elected to the Kaua`i County Council, noted that while the proposed rules expect PLDC projects to comply with Chapter 343, that statute merely requires the disclosure of environmental impacts, not their mitigation. 

 

Hooser also said he was “very disturbed” that the PLDC held only one hearing, in Honolulu. An estimated 80 to 90 percent of the land falling under PLDC’s purview is on the neighbor islands, and “a third of the state’s population has been left out of the process,” Hooser said.

 

“We are expected to put our trust in an agency that seems to be unable or unwilling to comprehend the level of value the public places in genuine good-faith community dialogue,” Maui resident Mahina Martin testified, adding that it was unfair for neighbor islanders to have to bear the cost of flying to O`ahu to be heard.

 

The Board did not take any action on its revised rules.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Read more…

the arrogance of power happy thanksgiving‏

Hawaii Monitor: Why Are Ethics So Tough To Come By In Government?

Sara Lin/Civil Beat

The State Ethics Commission has been making headlines, but are they making headway in ushering in higher standards of ethical conduct?

The commission has the responsibility to administer the state ethics code. Its job is to rein in elected and appointed officials when they stray from the high ethical standards the public expects.

This obviously hasn’t won them any popularity contests at the State Capitol.

Loading ImageProxy.mvc?bicild=&canary=0PIDDDJtgEsQWSiFnz50G8w7nzw6JGz0qy6d7X0Rrik%3d0&url=http%3a%2f%2fd22c3hi90fg43e.cloudfront.net%2fimages%2fxhr_indicator_content.gif

Immediately after taking over as the commission’s executive director nearly two years ago, Les Kondo advised legislators that accepting free tickets to a fancy reception put on by two industry groups was a no-no.

Many legislators were angered both by what they saw as an abrupt tightening of ethics constraints, and by Kondo’s occasionally abrasive way of delivering the message.

Of course, legislators pass judgment on the commission’s budget, and also control the fate of any proposals to reform or strengthen ethics laws.

In Hawaii’s small town political atmosphere, where “go along to get along” is the dominant approach, this provides a readily available means for legislators to push back against unwanted ethical advice.

The commission also faces pressure from the other direction, where a cynical public is ready and eager to pounce on alleged ethical lapses by public figures, spurred on by public interest watchdogs always pushing for stronger enforcement actions at a faster pace.

The commission is often caught firmly in the middle.

Nothing Is Simple

You would think ethics would be easy.

We teach kids a few simple things. Don’t lie. Don’t cheat. Don’t be selfish.

Expressed positively, we admonish them to tell the truth, follow the rules, and play fair.

Those are the same basic building blocks of the state ethics code.

So why are ethics in government so hard to deal with? Let me suggest a few reasons.

First, it’s always easier to see other people’s ethical problems. They have conflicts of interest. We just have friends, family, and business associates, and naturally want to help them out.

I often put it this way: There is a very fine line between community and corruption, and it’s all too easy to step across the line in our natural desire to help our friends.

Second, in politics and government, some people are paid very well to bend public decisions in their own favor.

Lobbyists aren’t paid to do what’s “right” for the whole community, although I’m sure most think their particular interests are best for the rest of us as well. They are paid to make public decisions come out right for their clients.

Lobbyists earn their keep by building positive relationships and trust with decision-makers, striving to become everyone’s best and most useful friend, and then using their friendships and influence to get their way.

With so much money and power at stake, it’s no coincidence that many potential violations of the ethics law involve gifts or favors exchanged, solicited, or offered in those complicated relationships between lobbyists and legislators.

Third, good-government reforms have a short half-life. Most laws are passed once and done.

But reforms, including public interest ethics laws, have to be won, and then won again, and again. These reforms usually grow out of scandal, get support from public officials as long as the spotlight is on them, and then are allowed to slowly drift into the background until the next scandal comes along. And while they are in the background, legislators and lobbyists return to chip away at them, coming back again and again to restore special privileges when the public isn’t paying attention or when public interest groups are stretched too thin to effectively resist.

Fourth, it turns out there are a lot of legal technicalities to consider when translating those basic ethical principles into effective ethics laws. And this means that even where there’s a consensus on ethics policies, there can be legitimate legal disagreement over how to translate that consensus into clear, understandable laws. The more complicated these disagreements, the harder it is for the public to remain interested and involved in the issues.

Finally, real corruption is relatively rare, so when getting down to the practical problem of distributing scarce resources and allocating budgets, the ethics commission, already short of legislative friends, seems to be at a distinct political disadvantage.

High Standards A Must

The public wants high standards of ethical conduct in government and elected officials say they agree, but then fail to provide the resources necessary to get the job done.

For example, state law requires lobbyists to register with the ethics commission and disclose what they spend influencing legislative decisions. But those disclosures, and the relationships they represent, go largely unexamined because the commission lacks sufficient staff to do the job. Apparent violations, when they are found, are usually reported by members of the public rather than turned up during reviews by commission staff.

Similarly, although advisory task force members now have to file personal financial disclosures, it is largely a symbolic change.

“It’s a practical issue,” Kondo told the commission last week, noting they lack the staff necessary to review financial disclosures for possible conflicts of interest.

These limitations render the new reporting requirements “somewhat meaningless,” Kondo said.

It’s too easy to get cynical about the intentions of public officials and special interests, and exasperated with the shortcomings of an under-resourced ethics commission. With communication between the commission and legislature strained by recent clashes over the application of ethics rules, it’s hard to see them developing a better working relationship in time to pursue any substantial and constructive changes in the upcoming 2013 legislative session.

Perhaps this is one of those times when leadership will have to come from elsewhere in the community.

Who’s ready to step up?

Read more…

Happy Thanksgiving? - Limerick

 

Pilgrims practiced Manifest Destiny

in a Theocratic society.

They spread their lies...

to non-whites' demise...

in the infamous "Land of the Free"!

Hau'oli Kau Makahiki! (Happy Makahiki Season) Remember 28th of  November is La Ku'oko'a (o Hawaii nei).  This is the day of the  recognition of Hawai'i's Independence as an independent, sovereign nation-state formally recognized internationally and accepted within the "Family of Nations".  It was the first non- European nation to become peers with them.  What a great accomplishment for the Kingdom of Hawaii! 

 

We in Hawai'i have something to celebrate; so let's do that and never forget it.

Read more…

FREE HAWAI`I TV - "NO DOUBT THEY WANT OUT"

FREE HAWAI`I TV
THE FREE HAWAI`I BROADCASTING NETWORK


"NO DOUBT THEY WANT OUT"

 

To Leave Is What They Want To Achieve - Secede With All Due Speed. 

 

Should Hawai`i Also Withdraw & Say Aloha? 

 

Or Is There A Better Solution For This Kind Of Dissolution? 

 

Take A Peek At Our Message This Week & Youʻll See Why Hawai`i Is So Unique.

 
Then Share This Video With One Other Person Today.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read more…

ANTI-SUPERFERRY FORCES OUT TO SINK PLDC

The Garden Island - November 18, 2012

People for the Preservation of Kaua‘i, one of the driving forces behind the fight against the Hawai`i Superferry, has reformed with a new mission — to squash Act 55 in court.


On May 20, 2011, Gov. Neil Abercrombie signed Act 55, creating the Public Land Development Corporation, comprised of five board members, none from Kaua‘i, who have broad powers to allow commercial development on public lands — including 1.8 million acres of ceded lands — while circumventing county zoning laws.


PLDC’s intent is to generate additional revenue for the Department of Land and Natural Resources, a state agency which has in its mission a pledge to protect the state’s limited natural, historic and cultural resources.


PPK Chairman Rich Hoeppner said his group — which is made up of an executive committee, working with two “top-notch” lawyers — is “revived, alive and well,” ready to fight what he describes as a “ridiculous” bill.


“Our goal is to raise funds to get this bill to the Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality of Act 55,” Hoeppner said Friday. “It is just total insanity what they are proposing … we’re going after this thing.”


Hoeppner, along with other opponents in the community, believes that the bill allows for large corporations to come to Kaua`i and develop public lands with no accountability.


“The only way we are going to beat them is to go to court … just like we did with Superferry....”


“...We’re going to beat it,” he said. “No doubt in my mind....”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Read more…


"Dedicated To Hawaiians - A Visit With Anton Krucky"

When Anton Krucky told his mother he was thinking of switching careers, she questioned his plans reminding him he was already successful in the engineering field. But Anton had other desires which included helping improve the lives of his fellow Hawaiians. Today, heʻs not only CEO of a very successful bio-tech company dedicated to amazing medical advances, but also contributing to the Hawaiian community in life-changing ways. Donʻt miss our visit with Anton and you too will see why heʻs so dedicated to Hawaiians - Watch It Here

 

MONDAY, November 19th At 5:30 PM O`ahu - `Olelo, Channel 53

MONDAY, November 19th At 6:30 PM Maui – Akaku, Channel 53
MONDAY, November 19th At 7:00 PM & FRIDAY, November 23rd At 5:30 PMHawai`i Island – Na Leo, Channel 53
TUESDAY, November 20th At 7:30 PM, THURSDAY, November 22nd At 7:30 PM & SATURDAY, November 24th At 8:00 PM - Kaua`i - Ho`ike, Channel 52

 

Now you can become a fan of Voices Of Truth on Facebook by clicking Here and see behind the scenes photos of our shows and a whole lot more.  

 

Voices Of Truth interviews those creating a better future for Hawai`i to discover what made them go from armchair observers to active participants. We hope you'll be inspired to do the same.
 

Voices Of Truth now airs on local access stations in over 70 cities across the US and throughout the world. Check your local listings.
 

If you support our issues on the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network, please email this to a friend to help us continue. A donation today helps further our work. Every single penny counts.
 

Donating is easy on our Voices Of Truth website via PayPal where you can watch Voices Of Truth anytime.
 

For news and issues that affect you, watch Free Hawai`i TV, a part of the Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network.
 

Please share our Free Hawai`i Broadcasting Network videos with friends and colleagues. That's how we grow. Mahalo.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read more…

How "Progressives" are Harming Hawaiians

"Progressives" are at it again with the PLDC which is their attempt to redistribute ALI'I LANDS to themselves.

Sadly "Progressives" have been trying to redistribute money in the form of taxes to themselves. Hard-working peoples' money in the form of taxes that are going for wind energy projects.

These wind energy farms are being subsidized by OUR tax dollars. I will post a study which shows these wind farms are NOT economically feasible. For now... please watch this video:

 Dictator Abercrombie signed Act 165 into law: 

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=sb&billnumber=2785

"Progressives" like Abercrombie are harming Hawaiians who live on homestead on Moloka'i as well as non-Hawaiians who live on Moloka'i.

Please take note of this.

Read more…

WHAT DOES FREE HAWAI`I MEAN?

Free Hawai`i means returning the Hawaiian Islands back to an independent nation status, as it was before it was illegally overthrown by US marines and rich sugar barons in 1893. In 1993, President Clinton formally apologized for that act and publicly acknowledged the illegality of the overthrow.

DID YOU KNOW -

98% of all Hawaiians living at the time opposed the illegal overthrow.


Today, less than 20% of all land in Hawai`i is in Hawaiian hands.

Over 60% today is in non-Hawaiian hands!

A few individuals, who are non-Hawaiian, lease an amount of land in Hawai`i that is greater than all land leased to all Native Hawaiians!

Currently, only 72 landowners control 95% of all land in Hawai`i.

Native Hawaiians make up the largest percentage of homeless in Hawai`i today.


Native Hawaiians have the worst social, educational and economic indicators compared to any ethnic group in the US.


Native Hawaiians currently have the worst health profile compared to any ethnic group in the US.


Hawaiian Nationals want their country and land back so they can grow their own foods, become healthy once again, and control their own destiny.


Hawai`i Was A Free Nation - But Never Free For The Taking

Read more…