Annelle Amaral has received a contract (W912CN-08-C-0051) from the Army totaling $742,392.00. Her statement of work says:

"(a) Prepare a written Community Relations Plan (CRP) which shall present aclear, comprehensive and responsive program to present and explain theissues of the presence of the Army in Hawaii to the affectedcommunities, neighborhood boards, special interest groups, resourceagencies at all levels of government, and interested individuals.
(b) Represent USAG-HI leadership at community meetings with communitygroups to provide information to community on the Army’s positions,activities, accomplishments as they relate to Native Hawaiian issues andother concerns;
(c) Obtain outside points of view, opinions, or advice of notedcommunity leaders, organizations, or experts to avoid too limitedjudgment on critical community and transformations issues, and providefeedback to USAG-HI leadership;
(d) Enhance USAG-HI’s understanding of, and develop alternativesolutions to, complex community issues, and provide advice on NativeHawaiian issues and concerns, and propose a way-ahead;
(e) Provide training or workshops to USAG-HI or Army personnel on Native Hawaiian issues and concerns.
(f) Attend monthly USAG-HI command and staff meetings or special topicplanning meetings. The SP shall attend meetings and serve as thesubject matter expert and provide technical and functional advice andassistance on community support and related special project issues.Meetings will be held on the Islands of Oahu and Hawaii."

Was this a congressional earmark or sole source (no-bid) contract? If so, who directed the earmark?

Where is the community relations plan? What did you advise the Army to do to solve it's problem with the Kanaka Maoli?

Her job is primarily to "fix" the Army's community relations problemwith Kanaka Maoli. One of the tactics has been to organize apro-military Kanaka Maoli front via the "Native Hawaiian Covenant" andthe Makua community leaders helicopter ride and photo op.

These are the same counterinsurgency methods used in Afghanistan andIraq to try to win over a segment of the native population present afig leaf of legitimacy for what is an illegal occupation. As it istrue for people around the world, no amount of community relations canchange the basic historical truths and the material consequences ofimperialism. The Army cannot "P.R." away a peoples' hunger forjustice.

We can expect that the line of discourse will be "can't we all getalong?". "How can we have a win-win situation?" "Can't we havereconciliation?" We can expect that there will be some acknowledgmentof past harm, and an openness to listening and doing things better. Wecan expect appeals to support the troops, our loved ones in the militarywho need to train.

But there cannot be a real reconciliation without sincere and justresolution of the historical wrongs or without addressing the immoralityof the current policies/wars. As long as the military occupieshundreds of thousands of acres of Hawaiian national land and uses theselands to practice invading and waging wars against other countries, howcan anyone seriously believe there can be reconciliation? And thepeople of Hawai'i did not declare a war or launch an invasion of otherpeoples' countries. The way to keep our loved ones safe is by keepingthem out of the war.

In March, Annelle Amaral was quoted on KITV as saying

The Army is systematically erasing the history and sacred places in Lihu'e, Kahuku, Pohakuloa and the other areas impacted by its Stryker Brigade expansion. The report by an independent archaeologist blasts
the Army for numerous violations and failings and calls for protection
of the vast and important cultural site complex in Lihu'e, O'ahu, once
the ancient seat of government for O'ahu chiefs. Meanwhile OHA sat on this urgent information.http://thehawaiiindependent.com/story/oha-stryker/OHA ‘drops the ball’ in protecting cultural sites from Stryker brigade

HONOLULU—Cultural sites that were supposed to have been protected from military vehicles and training exercises may have been put in jeopardy due to an oversight by The Office of Hawaiian Affairs
(OHA) lasting nearly a year.

At a special meeting with concerned community members last Thursday, OHA admitted to “dropping the ball” by not taking action on a damning report the agency received last year that criticized the Army’s efforts
at preserving cultural sites while training and constructing the Stryker
Brigade Combat Teams (SBCT).

OHA received the report in September 2009, and it suggests that parts of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) were disregarded. Trustees and staff discussed the item at a committee meeting in November. According to the minutes, Clyde Namuo, CEO, said
staff was to draft a letter to the Army requesting the protection of
sites mentioned in the document. It was revealed last week that no such
action had been taken since that committee meeting last year.

“A lot happened,” said Kai Markell, OHA’s Compliance Monitoring Manager, who noted some structural changes within the organization kept some employees in limbo. “Some of us didn’t know if we were going to be
here, and we lost a few people related to the project.”

The report, written by independently contracted archaeologist Christopher Monahan, comments on the Army’s numerous shortcomings in its attempts at documenting cultural sites, which, if included on the
National Register of Historic Places, offers them various protections
from being disturbed.

The report was the end result of a lawsuit OHA filed against the Army in November 2006 alleging violations against the NHPA and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). Cultural
monitors claimed that numerous sites were being mistreated or were
endangered, including Haleauau heiau near Schofield Barracks, whose
protective buffers were razed by bulldozers in July of that year.

In October 2008, a settlement was reached where OHA would drop its lawsuit based on its then knowledge of the existing surveys and reports. In return, the Army allowed the independently contracted archaeologist,
Monahan, as well as OHA staff, access to Stryker Brigade sites for a
total of 50 days in order to draw up an objective second opinion. OHA
had the option then to proceed with mediation or litigation based on the
new findings.

OHA initially gave the report to Terri Kekoolani, program coordinator for the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) Hawaii, a few weeks ago at her request.

Monahan is critical of the methods used in the previous surveys conducted by the military and its hired firms, recognizing there are issues with the competency of the field personnel involved. It also
notes a general lack of subsurface testing, or excavating, to locate
such sites. Instead, there are “mere guesses ... and based on relatively
little scientific data.”

At some locations, Monahan’s findings more than doubled the number of known features the Army had previously reported.

There is also concern regarding numerous earlier reports—ones that evaluated surveys taken of impacted areas—that were not made available to him because they were in draft form. Most problematic was a major
report on the Kahuku Training Area, which was completed six years ago
but is still not available.

Many of those in attendance recommended that, due to the Army’s violations of NHPA as cited in the report, an injunction should be filed by OHA to halt construction and training activities, until these issues
are resolved. Markell said he would consult with upper management and
the legal team on the options.

“We will refocus our efforts,” Markell said.

Members of the Royal Order of Kamehameha were in attendance as leaders of the Army and Native Hawaiian community forged an historic agreement to improve relations. Photo by John Matsuzaki

Army and Hawaiian leaders bridge old gulf with new agreement

By Liza Simon / Ka Wai Ola Loa

Conflict has often divided the military and the Hawaiian community, but a new symbolic accord marks an effort to forge positive
relations.

In a March 24 ceremony at Fort DeRussy, a first-of-its-kind Native Hawaiian Covenant was signed by representatives of the Army and Native Hawaiian organizations. The agreement is a pledge
between the parties to promote mutual respect and understanding.

According to a news release, speaker Neil Hannahs of Kamehameha Schools said that the agreement marked a turning point for Kanaka
Maoli, "who have endured events that pushed our culture to the brink of
extinction."

OHA Chairperson Haunani Apoliona and OHA Chief Operating Officer Stanton Enomoto joined with other prominent members of the Hawaiian community to witness the signing of the covenant. Photoby John Matsuzaki

"We are dedicated to remember our past and perpetuate our traditions," he said. "But we realize that it is equally important to turn our
focus toward the horizon and navigate our way to a world in which
relationships and outcomes are as we would wish them to be."

Hannahs is a member of the U.S. Army Garrison-Hawai'i's Native Hawaiian Advisory Council organized last year by the Army to assist in
brokering the new covenant.

The covenant reads in part: "We recognize … Native Hawaiians' cultural and historical experience is shaped by the land and surrounding ocean
... that as the Army maintains and uses the land of Hawai'i, it is mindful to
protect and preserve this fragile environment and ensure that what remains is
a meaningful legacy for future generations." It further states that the parties are "committed to a mutually beneficial relationship" by promoting
dialogue and understanding of each other's culture and values.

Neil Hannahs of Kamehameha Schools adds his name to the agreement, which he helped to craft as a member of the Army’s Native Hawaiian Advisory Council. Photo by John Matsuzaki

The signing ceremony featured traditional presentation of ho'okupu by the Royal Order of Kamehameha I and the planting of an 'ulu tree
to symbolize harmony. In the crowd of more than 200 were Army Col. Matthew
Margotta, Commander of the U.S. Army Garrison-Hawai'i, Office of Hawaiian Affairs Chairperson Haunani Apoliona, OHA Chief Operating Officer Stanton
Enomoto, OHA Special Assistant to the CEO Martha Ross, and Association of
Hawaiian Civic Clubs president Leimomi Khan.

U.S. Army Col. Margotta participates in the Hawaiian protocol that was part of the signing ceremony. Photo by John Matsuzaki

"It was an overwhelmingly humbling experience to see leaders of both our Native Hawaiian community and the Army come together and pledge
their commitment to maintaining a mutually beneficial partnership," Annelle Amaral, Native Hawaiian liaison for the Army, said in a news release.
"The signing of this covenant is a significant step to our vision of a
relationship built on understanding, respect and trust."

She added: "We mahalo all the individuals that made this possible, especially the members of our Native Hawaiian Advisory Council,
Colonel Margotta and Sen. Daniel Inouye for their dedication and determination
in fulfilling the promise of this covenant."

The 1897 Petitions Protesting Annexation

Noenoe K. Silva

© 1998 Noenoe K. Silva

When William McKinley won the presidential election in November of 1896, the question of Hawaii's annexation to the U.S. was again opened. The previous president,
Grover Cleveland, was a friend of Queen Liliuokalani. He had remained opposed
to annexation until the end of his term, but McKinley was open to persuasion
by U. S. expansionists and by annexationists from Hawaii. He agreed to meet
with a committee of annexationists from Hawaii, Lorrin Thurston, Francis Hatch
and William Kinney. After negotiations, in June of 1897, McKinley signed a treaty
of annexation with these representatives of the Republic of Hawaii. The President
then submitted the treaty to the U. S. Senate for approval.

The Hui Aloha Aina for Women, the Hui Aloha Aina for Men, and the Hui Kalaiaina formed a coalition to oppose the treaty. Together, these three organizations
represented a majority of the Kanaka Maoli (Native Hawaiians). Hui Kalaiaina
had originally been formed after the Bayonet Constitution of 1887 as a vehicle
for Kanaka Maoli political power. The two Hui Aloha Aina organizations were
founded just after the overthrow of the Native government in 1893, expressly
to support the Queen and to oppose U.S. annexation.

The Kanaka Maoli believed that the American government was committed to their stated principles of justice and of
government of the people, by the people, and for the
people. They believed that once the U.S. President and
members of Congress saw that the great majority of Hawaiian
citizens opposed the annexation, the principles of fairness
would prevail, that is, their Native government would be
restored. The three huis therefore began to organize mass
petition drives The heading on Hui Aloha Aina's petition
read: PALAPALA HOOPII KUE HOOHUI AINA, Petition Protesting
Annexation

On September 6, 1897, the Hui Aloha Aina held a halawai makaainana - a mass meeting - , at Palace Square, which thousands of poe aloha aina - patriots
- attended. President James Kaulia gave a rousing speech, saying "We, the
nation (lahui) will never consent to the annexation of our lands, until the
very last patriot lives." He said agreeing to annexation was like agreeing
to be buried alive. He predicted that annexation would open the door for many
foreigners to come here, and to take jobs and resources away from the Native
people. He asked, "Then where will we live?" The crowd answered, "In
the mountains," which figuratively means, "we shall be homeless."
He asserted that a mass refusal by the people could prevent the annexation:
"If the nation remains steadfast in its protest of annexation, the Senate
can continue to strive until the rock walls of Iolani Palace crumble, and never
will Hawaii be annexed to America!" The annexationist newspapers had published
threats that the leaders of the mass meeting would be arrested for treason,
but Mr. Kaulia assured the people that their assembly was legal. He said that
it was because the brains of the government could not push over the brains of
the Kanaka Maoli that the government had to resort to weapons of war. (At this
time, Hawaii was ruled by a haole - European- American - oligarchy called
the Republic of Hawaii that had deprived the Native people of political participation.)
He said, "Let us take up the honorable field of struggle, brain against
brain." He told the people, "Do not be afraid, be steadfast in aloha
for your land and be united in thought. Protest forever the annexation of Hawaii
until the very last aloha aina [lives]!" The crowd cheered.

Following Kaulia, David Kalauokalani, President of the Hui Kalaiaina, explained the details of the annexation treaty to the crowd. He told them that the Republic
of Hawaii had agreed to give full government authority over to the United States,
reserving nothing. It would also give all the government's money, the government
and crown lands, government buildings, harbors, bays, military forts, military
armaments and warships, and all resources claimed by the government of the Hawaiian
Islands. Furthermore, he explained, the laws of the United States would not
extend to the Hawaiian Islands, but the Congress of the U.S. would decide how
Hawaii was to be governed. It was uncertain whether the Kanaka Maoli would have
the right to vote. He said those who favored annexation would want to deny Kanaka
Maoli voting rights because, from the very beginning, they have known that the
Kanaka Maoli would overwhelmingly vote against annexation and anyone who supported
it. This is the reason they were always afraid to put a vote to the people.

A resolution protesting the annexation was read to the crowd, who approved it. It was announced that U.S. Senator
Morgan, an advocate of annexation, would be arriving soon,
and that there would be another mass meeting held while he
was here.

The petition drive started at about this time. Very soon afterwards, Mrs. Abigail Kuaihelani Campbell, President of the Women's branch of the Hui Aloha Aina,
and Mrs. Emma Aima Nawahi boarded the inter-island ship the Kinau for
Hilo on a signature gathering mission.

On September 14, Senator Morgan and four congressmen from the U.S. indeed arrived. On the same day, Mr. Enoch Johnson and Mr. Simon Peter Kanoa boarded the Claudine
for Maui, and Mrs. Kaikioewa Ulukou departed for Kauai - all bound to gather
signatures on those islands. The Hui Aloha Aina paid all of their expenses.

At the same time, there was a branch of the Hui Aloha Aina active at Kalaupapa (on the island of Molokai) where people with leprosy were imprisoned.¹
The President of the Kalaupapa branch was Mr. Robert M. Kaaoao, who not only
gathered signatures on the protest petitions, but had also organized a full
day's activities to commemorate the Queen's birthday on September 2. The activities
included a prayer service; boating, swimming, running, horse, and donkey races;
as well as pole climbing and apple eating contests.

When Mrs. Campbell and Mrs. Nawahi arrived in Hilo harbor, they were greeted with honors. A delegation of the Hilo chapter of the Hui, consisting of Mr.
Henry West, Mrs. Hattie Nailima, Mrs. Kekona Pilipo, and Mrs. J.A. Akamu met
them at the harbor. The Hilo delegation showered them with leis, and proclaimed
that a Hawaiian double-hulled canoe would carry them into the harbor. They had
decorated five seats on the beautiful vessel with leis of maile, lehua, and
other flowers, and had a Hawaiian flag waving at the back. The people of Laupahoehoe
had sent welcome gifts of opihi, limu, and fish. Mrs. Campbell and Mrs. Nawahi
attended meetings of the Hui Aloha Aina all over the Hilo and Puna area, and
returned with thousands of signatures.

Meanwhile Mrs. Laura Mahelona was working hard in Kona and Kau; she was the committee member delegated to gather signatures there of both men and women.
She traveled from North Kona south to Kau, leaving blank petitions with instructions
everywhere she went. She told the chapter presidents to get the petitions signed
and return them in a few days when her ship would stop again at the same harbors.
When she returned, signed petitions were ready at every harbor. When she landed
at each port, she was welcomed by the women of the Hui Aloha Aina branches,
carrying leis over their arms, and when she returned to the boat, her clothes
couldn't be seen because she was completely covered by leis. Mrs. Mahelona gathered
4,216 signatures.

Mrs. Kaikioewa Ulukou gathered 2,375 on the island of Kauai.

Mr. Simon P. Kanoa gathered 1,944 in the district of Hana, Maui.

When all the work was done, there were over 21,000 signatures- men's and women's in about equal numbers. When
one considers that the population of Native Hawaiians at
the time was less than 40,000, this is an impressive
number.

The Hui Kalaiaina also had a substantial membership- -they conducted their own petition drive at the same time,
collecting about 17,000 signatures.

The Hui Aloha Aina held another mass meeting on October 8, 1897, and at that time decided to send delegates
to Washington D.C. to present the petitions to President
McKinley and to the Congress.

The executive committees of the three hui met and decided to send four delegates: James Kaulia of Hui Aloha
Aina, David Kalauokalani of Hui Kalaiaina, with John
Richardson, and with William Auld as secretary. All four
were Kanaka Maoli. This was an important sign to the
nation. Some people had written in the papers that previous
delegates to Washington had failed because they were not
Kanaka Maoli, or because they were too wealthy to truly
have the nation's well-being in mind at all times. It is
important to note that although a women's representative
did not travel to Washington, Mrs. Campbell, President of
the women's branch of Hui Aloha Aina, was part of the
decision-making committee, and was viewed as a leader of
the nation along with the men.

The four Elele Lahui - National Delegates - left Hawaii on November 20, 1897. In San Francisco on November
28, they commemorated La Kuokoa - Hawaiian Independence
Day.

They arrived in Washington on December 6, the day that the Senate opened. They first met briefly with Queen
Liliuokalani, who was staying in Washington. Then they met
Senator Richard Pettigrew who took them in to the Senate's
opening ceremonies. After the ceremonies, they returned to
Ebbitt House where the Queen was staying, and where they
would also stay. Someone told them at that time that their
trip to Washington was useless, since it was known that
there 58 votes on the side of annexation, with only 2 more
votes needed for the treaty to pass. They said they didn't
answer but remained as quiet as doves. They spoke amongst
themselves later, however, to plan what to do.

The next day, December 7, they met again with the Queen to consider how to present the petitions. They chose
the Queen as chair of their Washington committee. Together,
they decided to present the petitions of Hui Aloha Aina
only, because the substance of the two sets of petitions
was different. Hui Aloha Aina's was called "petition
protesting annexation," but the Hui Kalaiaina's petitions
called for the monarchy to be restored. They agreed that
they did not want to appear divided, as if they had
different goals.

The day after that, the delegates met with Senator Hoar, who was against annexation. They braved snow, cold
and slippery streets to get to the Senator's residence.
They said the "elemakule" (old man) greeted them with a
handshake². He asked them what the people of Hawaii thought
about annexation. John Richardson, the spokesman, explained
everything. While he was explaining, they could see tears
welling up in the old man's eyes. Richardson told him that
they brought petitions signed by the whole nation
protesting the annexation. Senator Hoar told them to submit
the petitions to him, and he would bring them before the
Senate, and then to the Foreign Relations Committee. David
Kalauokalani of Hui Kalaiaina also submitted his
endorsement of those petitions (so that the U.S. would know
both huis had the same goal). On December 9, Senator Hoar
read the text of the petitions to the Senate and had them
formally accepted. The delegates were present, seated in
the area where people are allowed to observe the Senate
proceedings.

On December 10, the delegates met with Secretary of State John Sherman, and Kalauokalani submitted a memorial
protesting annexation (Ka Memoriala a ka Lahui) to him.

In the following days, the delegates met with many different Senators and Congressmen. Senators Pettigrew and
White encouraged them in the hope that the annexation
treaty would be defeated. They said that they were asked a
lot of questions about Japan or England trying to annex
Hawaii. They answered that either of them could have taken
Hawaii if they had wanted to any time in the past five
years. Why would they wait for America to try before they
did so? They also reminded the U.S. Congressmen that
Hawaii had remained independent for fifty years, partly
because of the 1843 resolution signed by Great Britain and
France guaranteeing Hawaii's independence.

By the time they left Washington on February 27, there were only 46 votes in the Senate on the pro-annexation
side, down from 58 when they had arrived. Forty-six votes
was far too few for the treaty to pass -- sixty votes were
necessary.

Senator Pettigrew and Senator Turpie insisted that the Kanaka Maoli of Hawaii be given a chance to vote on
annexation. But Senator Morgan and the other pro-annexation
Senators knew that if a vote were taken, it would be
overwhelmingly in favor of Hawaii's independence. In a
report, these Senators wrote, "If a requirement should be
made by the United States of a plebiscite [vote] to
determine the question of annexation, it would work a
revolution in Hawaii which would abolish its constitution."
They knew, in other words, that if the people were allowed
to vote, not only would they reject annexation, they would
also reject the haole Republic that had been forced upon
them against their will.

Three of the delegates, James Kaulia, David Kalauokalani, and William Auld returned to Honolulu
victorious, sure that the treaty would fail, as indeed it
did. They had carried the hard work and hopes of the whole
nation to Washington in the form of the protest petitions.
They had succeeded in persuading many senators to vote
against the treaty. They left behind John Richardson to
continue the work, along with Queen Liliuokalani, her
secretary Joseph Heleluhe, and her devoted friend, J.O.
Carter.

One annexation crisis was over, but another was soon to follow. This same year, the peoples of Cuba and the
Philippines were fighting wars of independence against
Spain. The United States also declared war on Spain after
the U.S. warship, the Maine was blown up in a harbor in
Cuba. The reason that the Maine was even in Cuba is
questionable, since the U.S. had not been involved until it
involved itself by sending the ship there. Be that as it
may, the United States was at war. Suddenly, the empire-
builders of the United States were saying that they needed
to send military troops on ships to the Philippines to
fight Spain. For this, they said they needed Hawaii. In
the midst of the fever of war, a Joint Resolution of
Congress called the Newlands Resolution passed by a simple
majority of each house, making Hawaii a territory of the
United States. That was in July of 1898; the flag of the
United States was hoisted over Hawaii on August 12th.

The Kanaka Maoli continued to protest. The Hui Kalaiaina concentrated on persevering to undo the
annexation, and restore the Native government. Hui Aloha
Aina began to work towards securing full civil and
political rights for Hawaiian citizens in the U.S.
territorial system. In 1900, the two huis banded together
as one political organization called the Home Rule Party.
David Kalauokalani was elected President, and James Kaulia
as Vice-President. This was the party that elected Robert
Kalanihiapo Wilcox as (non-voting) Delegate to the U.S.
Congress.

James Keauiluna Kaulia continued his work for his nation until the day of his death at age 41, in 1902. On
that Sunday, he spent the morning at the jail house trying
to help prisoners assert their rights. After church and
lunch, he lay down for a nap from which he never woke up.
He died of heart failure.

David Kalauokalani lived until 1915, also serving his people all of his life. He served as a senator in the
territorial legislature, and as a member of the Board of
Health. His son, also named David, became the first clerk
of the City and County of Honolulu.

Mrs. Kuaihelani Campbell served as President of Hui Aloha Aina for its entire existence. She later became
well-known as a benefactor for the ill and poor among her
people, and for her many charitable deeds. She married
Samuel Parker in 1902. Her daughter Abigail married Prince
David Kawananakoa at about the same time, and Mrs.
Campbell-Parker thereby became an ancestor to the royal
family remaining in Hawaii today. She passed away in 1908.

Mrs. Emma Aima Nawahi kept the newspaper Ke Aloha Aina running for many years as its owner and business
manager. She sold it in 1910. She also remained active in
charities until her death in 1935.

The petitions protesting annexation, consisting of five hundred fifty-six pages, are now held in the National
Archives in Washington D.C.

The Kanaka Maoli continue to protest today. We have never relinquished our national sovereignty. Kanaka Maoli
are working on state, national, and international levels to
have our existence as a nation recognized. Kanaka Maoli
also continue to resist and protest every encroachment upon
our inherent rights to this land, our ocean and fresh
waters, and all the other natural resources of Hawaii. We
are insisting as well on our rights to keep our language
and cultural traditions, and the land itself, alive.

Sources consulted

• Coffman, Tom. Personal communications, 1997.
• Earle, David William. "Coalition politics in Hawaii 1887- 90: Hui Kalaiaina and the Mechanics and Workingmen's
  Political Protective Union." MA thesis, University of
  Hawaii.
• Ka Loea Kalaiaina (newspaper) various issues 1897-1898.
• Ke Aloha Aina (newspaper) various issues 1897-1898.
• Russ, William Adam. The Hawaiian republic (1894-98) and its struggle to win annexation. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna
  University Press, 1992 [1961].
• Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. 55th Congress. [Sen. 55A-J11.2]. National Archives and Records Administration.
• Senate Report 681 (55th Congress 2nd Session).

Footnotes

1 The government called their confinement "quarantine," but the people confined called themselves "prisoners." It was nearly impossible to
escape the quarantine area bounded by rough seas and sheer cliffs.
Prisoners were sent there for life; most would never see any family
member again. Furthermore, the prisoners were not given adequate food
or medicine, which added to their sense of being punished.

2 This handshake seemed to be an important detail in the reports of their meeting with Senator Hoar. It may be because the delegates were
subjected to race prejudice in Washington some white men may have
refused to shake their hands. They do not complain of this directly,
however.

http://libweb.hawaii.edu/digicoll/annexation/pet-intro.html

ACTION ALERT !!! KOKUA !! COURT HEARING TO STOP THE EVICTION OF HAKIPUʻU LEARNING CENTER TOMORROW FRIDAY JULY 30TH 3PM DISTRICT COURT ROOM 5-C. COME OUT AND SHOW YOUR SUPPORT !!


* What: Court hearing to stop the eviction of the Hakipu’u Learning Center

* When: This Friday, July 30 court hearing starts at 3pm, come early limited parking Where: District Court Building, Court Room 5-C. The court is located on the corner of Alakea Street and Hotel Street. District Court1111 Alakea StHonolulu, HI 96813 Link for location of the court:

* Who: Please tell everyone to come down to the court to help show support for the Hakipu’u Learning Center to help to stop the school from being evicted The judge that will be hearing the case is Judge Trader.

Please wear you Hakipu’u Learning Center shirts. Mahalo for the kokua.

We are still having our our Rally at the Hakipu'u Learning Center this Sunday, August 1st at 1pm at the school.