preservation (8)

The state Office of Hawaiian Affairs is questioning the age of human burials — to date, more than 600 sets of remains — removed by Kawaiaha‘o Church in preparation for building a $17.5 million multipurpose center.


The state agency advocating for Native Hawaiians sent a letter this week to the state Department of Land and Natural Resources requesting detailed information about the burials to show whether they are all Christian burials, as the church contends, or whether some predate the church and should be protected by Hawaii’s historic burial law.


Kawaiaha‘o was established in 1842 to become Hawaii’s first church, and it has been allowed to disinter an unlimited number of human remains, or iwi kupuna, under an exemption to the burial law that gives special protections to traditional Hawaiian burials.


The exemption applies to known and actively maintained cemeteries, and was approved by DLNR and upheld by a Circuit Court judge.


But OHA questions whether the church is digging up burials that predate Kawaiaha‘o’s existence, especially given the “exceedingly large” number of remains, which includes 605 burials and thousands of individual bones as of Sept. 9.


“Since the historical record indicates that the area contained burial sites prior to the establishment of Kawaiaha‘o Church, questions of this nature are warranted,” OHA said in its letter dated Sept. 17.


OHA  is asking DLNR to obtain details about the burials such as their depth, position, orientation, whether they are in a coffin and whether artifacts are present. Other details that could help date burials such as the presence of remains of animals, plants and ref­use in proximity to burials are also being sought.


Kawaiaha‘o is required to notify DLNR’s State Historic Preservation Division of burial findings weekly, but the reports typically state only when and how many burials were removed.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Read more…

RAIL CONSTRUCTION HALTED UNTIL 2013 SPRING

Human Remains Discovery Stop Project Indefinitely

The first human remains to be discovered in the path of the Honolulu rail project have been unearthed in Kaka`ako by a crew conducting an archaeological survey for the project.

State Historic Preservation Division Administrator Pua Aiu said Thursday the bone fragment, believed to be Hawaiian remains dating to pre-contact times, was discovered Wednesday in a "nonburial site context" along with shell fragments and fire-cracked rocks.

The excavation appeared to have penetrated an old building site, revealing brick from a building foundation on each side of the trench, she said.

The bone was discovered at a depth of about 4 feet, she said. SHPD instructed the archaeologists working on the trench to leave the bone in place and continue excavating around it.

Dan Grabauskas, executive director of the Hono­lulu Authority for Rapid Transportation, visited the Kaka`ako site where the first human remains in the path of the rail project were discovered.

The $5.26 billion rail line is the largest public works project in Hawaii history, and the city has already agreed to pay more than $22 million in contractor claims because of delays.

Concerns that the discovery of Hawaiian burials along the rail route will delay construction were underscored Wednesday afternoon when a crew conducting the archaeological survey in Kaka`ako unearthed the first human remains discovered within the rail route.

The city has been surveying the 20-mile rail route in sections and has not completed the portions of the route in urban Hono­lulu where experts agree that burials are most likely to be found.

Last month the state Supreme Court ruled construction should not have begun on the $5.26 billion rail project until an archaeological survey was completed for the entire rail route.

In a unanimous ruling, the court found that rules governing the State Historic Preservation Division did not allow that agency to agree to the rail project until the city finished the survey to determine whether there are Native Hawaiian burials or other archaeological resources in the path of the rail line.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Read more…
State Historic Preservation Division To Be Questioned In Public Forum On Operational Problems

Representative Lyla Berg is convening a community forum tomorrow in Honolulu to address serious ongoing concerns with the State Historic Preservation Division.

The public is strongly encouraged to attend and voice their concerns.

A highly-critical letter dated March 19, 2010, from the US Department of Interior's National Park Service to Department of Land and Natural Resources Director Laura Thielen placed the dysfunctional department on “high risk” status because of “…significant operational problems…" and "…serious deficiencies identified in audits going back as far as 2002.”

WHEN - Wednesday, April 14, 2010, from 6:30 - 8:30 PM
WHERE - Wilson Elementary School Cafeteria in Kahala - 4945 Kilauea Avenue
MORE INFO - (808) 586-6510
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Read more…
Aloha-The Mayor and Director of Finance are getting ready to sell the Hamakua Lands to meet the budget shortfall.THESE ARE OUR LANDS- OWNED BY THE TAXPAYERS.J Yoshimoto's Resolution 216 to sell the Hamakua Lands, (which will be heard at the council meeting on Wednesday, September 2nd) sets the price at $8.2 million and also allows a sealed bid OR an auction. There are 16 parcels in this sale for a total of 737 acres. They are individually listed on the Resolution on the last page ( see attached)I believe that each of the 17 properties should be appraised separately. They each have unique characteristics that would make some worth more than others, such as proximity to utilities, elevation differences, soil differences. What if a Buyer only wants a few of these properties? What is the next door neighbor just wants to purchase one of the properties? Is this to be an all or nothing sale? I don't believe that the requirement to purchase all of these properties serve taxpayers by getting the best price.A sealed bid does not allow the County to get the best price or allows this to be a transparent process. An open auction is the best way to get the best price and the way to open and above board dealings.The resolution says they will be "returned to service" as property tax yielding land. What are the anticipated yearly property taxes that will be gained for this $8 million?THESE LANDS COULD BE USED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND FARMING WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT PART OF THE PRODUCTION FROM THESE LANDS REMAIN ON OUR ISLAND TO FEED OUR FAMILIES.On Bill 132, proposed by Council member Dominic Yagong, which will be heard on Tuesday, September 1 at the Finance Committee in Kona, changes the process of land sales to give the council the right to approve the sale of properties of more than 10 acres. This is a VERY IMPORTANT idea- The public should be informed of ALL sales of publicly owned properties.THIS BILL SHOULD BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTIES. IN addition to what is stated in this legislation (Bill 132), I believe that the agreements of sale, appraisals, title reports and any other agreements should be a matter of public record and posted on the Internet on the Finance Department's website. We should be informed as to who participated in the bidding process, so we can see that the process was open to everyone.Documents for property acquisition should also be a matter of public record and easily accessible on the Internet.OUR government should serve us in a TRANSPARENT manner, so we can make sure our public officials are serving our best interests.If you would like to comment on this issue to the Council and Mayor , please cut and paste the following in your TO: box for email.dikeda@co.hawaii.hi.us, donishi@co.hawaii.hi.us, enaeole@co.hawaii.hi.us, cohmayor@co.hawaii.hi.us, counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us, dyagong@co.hawaii.hi.us, genriques@co.hawaii.hi.us, bford@co.hawaii.hi.us, kgreenwell@co.hawaii.hi.us, jyoshimoto@co.hawaii.hi.us, phoffmann@co.hawaii.hi.us,
Read more…
When was the last time you ever heard of meetings going on in your district?Please contact your county and find out when their next meeting is and get on their mailing list.1). What is listed for your area?2). Get Instructions on how to complete any Survey Forms for your area(s) of concern.3). Why not have everything listed.GET ACTIVE, PRESERVE AND PROTECT!
Read more…
So what happened to this land....As the story goes, the land was "given" to large land owner Kohala Sugar Plantation by the State of Hawaii when they realized they did not have the deed to the property. In 1981 the Kohala Sugar Plantaton's phase out project called The Kohala Taskforce was actually the cleanup crew in preparation of the lands being sold to a Texas outfit. It then was sold to a Japanese business calling themselves Chalon International, Inc. Locals smelled real estate being sold when this happened. Their first project being MAHUKONA, a proposed resort which in 1993 was still in a lawsuit with Kohala community group Hui Lihikai for almost a decade. It went to the supreme court and Chalon Int'l did not receive their permits to develop their resort. However they could develop a golf course but who would invest in a project of a golf course without a resort....so Chalon was at a standstill and in need of cash flow.This then brought leases with agriculture to make some money and then in more real estate being sold to high end individuals. Today they are back in MAHUKONA but they are now calling themselves Surety Kohala and their developer is Kohala Preserve Conservation Trust, LLC. It's the same 'ole players changing names and playing politics. They are not going to preserve anything. Since they can't build their resort, why not then high end homes and build near and around our only Navigational Heiau and NUMEROUS pre-contact kanaka maoli sites. Stop calling it a cultural center when in fact there is nothing cultural about disrespcting our past and their pathways. I can tell you "chicken skin" true stories about blocking pathways of our deceased whether in trails or canoe houses but that's another blog post later.So today, this Mahukona Project is being endorsed by the Kawaihae Canoe Club and what they are being sold is the "cultural center". Did they know that one of their paddlers (unless he recently quit to protect self interest) was the original attorney on the Chalon vs Hui Lihikai lawsuit? Do they even remember any kind of lawsuit? Did the Kawaihae Canoe Club know of agreements Chalon, known today as Surety Kohala; made with our community which the County must enforce? The County was also included in this same lawsuit. I know there are koko who paddle for the club and I mean no disrespect to them personally or as a whole as a club - U GUYS ARE BEING DECEIVED...ask our community who have been in battle of our coastline for over 30 years what's going on. It is sad that we have the north and south split and what's happening in the north they try to pursuade those in the south to go against us where WE live and want to protect because of all the NUMEROUS pre-contact kanaka maoli archaeological sites of significance. We want OPEN SPACE and CONSERVATION not protection by weeding the landscape and exposing change to an area where the mana will seriously change. Is this cultural? What is cultural is PROTECTION ALL THE WAY, NOT HALF WAY.Land = Profit in today's economy and it also means homelessness for our people. It means poor water, poor or no food or unhealthy food on our table. Would you eat fish out of the Ala Wai? And why not? It shouldn't be this way for our people. Development changes our landscape on land and in the ocean. In chieftan times of old, when kanaka maoli suffered it was considered a disgrace to a good chief for it was unheard of. We need to all take care of each other and one way of doing that is to protect lands and protect our past all for our futureSo as to MAHUKONA, here's a link to find out what is the status and letters I and KAKO'O sent this month to the County Planning Director. http://kamakani.org/mahukonapermits.html
Read more…
About a little over a week now, I received the final bill from NHLC on the PAO'O case now closed. If I can recall, I believe it was either 420 or 470 hours of legal fees; include copies, faxes, phone calls; not included but provided: expert witnesses flown from Oahu others traveled from across our island driving, mainland witnesses by phone, meals, lodging, mapping and surveying the property all for a weeks worth of testimonies, etc etc, it was exhausting yet so exhilarating.We didn't get exposure in the local paper and maybe it's because of the big guns we went up against? Media propaganda? Politics? LOL.If you hadn't heard, the owner of the property decided to get a better attorney by the time we went to our hearings - KS Trustee Dougas Ing. Of course, Mr. Ing probably didn't see the information of request from the owner when this case went through his office. If he knew I don't believe he would have taken the case. At least this is my thinking, I'm giving him the better of the doubt because PAO'O is such a sensitive land issue. So sensitive that when I was cross examined, Mr. Ing questioned the value of the property on level of spirit. You know, the ".....if in fact, this place is __________, isn't it protocol to ________?" I said, you are correct but this place is very special and unlike what is the norm, in fact I have all this information (about an inch and a half of documents) to tell you about this place so if you ask I can tell you, but only if you ask, this is why I am here today because it isn't right, NO GOOD....." Mr. Ing understood and of course he didn't want to ask before eebee jeebee chiken skin kine stuff. So, because of this line of questioning and my answer back, And because this is OLD land OLD culture OLD history and not the norm he didn't dare ask. I know he knew what I meant and this was probably an awakening to his na'au, his koko and my mana'o to share because it was to PROTECT THIS LAND AND OTHERS.I hugged Mr. Ing during this week long testimony because in my opinion, he had the hardest job. The job of not knowing the whole story about the case because he came aboard at the very end. He wasn't there in the beginning when the crooked one was in action - at least he thought he was, he mustn't have been THAT good to be replaced by Mr. Ing's Firm.Our testimonies were wicked man, so right on and I wish more koko were there to see all this unfold. Did we win? I think we did on some level. We really wanted a final ruling but because the owner withdrew without prejudice with the option to file again he was scared on some level maybe or maybe he will wait to justify his development due to new development occurring close by.In any event, the land is safe for now and we kept it safe for all this time. Maybe we will need to regroup when the owner decides to take another stab at it. Maybe he will listen to me and build elsewhere for the sake of his family and their wellbeing. Maybe they don't care I don't know. But I do know that the permit is not happening now and the owner spent BUCKS on the fight till the end. If we had the ruling, we all believed it would have been awesome at least this being our hope differed thinking.So now the next project on the agenda is MAHUKONA....whew, like we all need a vacation after this case. But MAHUKONA is next. We have to set Surety Kohala straight on their a**. We start to the point in facts with a nice but firm letters to the county planning director - we haven't found out yet if the county let the permits expireMy daughter's pa'ina to celebrate her graduaton from KS is this month for it's 1:13am...SMILE. We're celebrating with 300 guests at MAHUKONA. The pavillion can hold only 64, I couldn't reserve all the camping permits to get the entire grounds if I did then I wouldn't have a valid excuse to not invite others who I would love to be there in attendance. So hard to plan a pa'ina when you have to cut your list down yeah? For you koko out there, who like to party you know what I mean...SMILE.So I was thinking this week and I had to TELL my daughter my plans for part of the decoration. She agreed and then LOL about her party being political....LOL. I told her that it was appropriate to do this because of Ephesians 1:3 and the land itself said to belong to Princes Ruth Ke'elikolani. So, I'm providing information about Princess Ruth from what PBS portrayed, Star Bulletin wrote an article. Why trust it? Because then it wouldn't feel so political for I have friends too that can't make up their mind on soverignty issues. I'm not there to offend them, I want them to have a good time, but they should know history of what was then and what is now. I decided to provide information on:1). The clouded title issue 2). Our Princess of the past 3). What Surety Kohala is doing to the landAnd because it will be hot there I will have all this information under a folding hand fan along with other decorations, I wonder if the information will have people talking about how important MAHUKONA is, or maybe they will just sit quiet and not say anything because it's a sensitive issue? Whatever the outcome it is something I feel the need to do in respect of 'Aina.The grounds of the pa'ina will look over the harbor point where the Navigational Heiau is - the crane and dozers were there when my daughter and I went down to check out the grounds again before completing our list of to do things. It saddens me when land owners with clouded titles don't truly do the right thing. They'll pay...heard some rumors that they don't have money or they are looking for investors who thought the project to be pono but could have found out it truly isn't.So, with all the kids going back to school it's hectic around my house. I'm going to picture all 2300+ people on this list and their extended families at my pa'ina - envision we all walking to the Navigational Heiau to pay respect and see how awesome this place is - to know we care what happens down there to give our energy, feel the energy to have the land fight back in all her honor....EXHALE...I have some ideas of what I would like to see happen if my colleagues and I are not able to stop Surety Kohala and their mischeivious deeds and politics but what I see is just entertaining thoughts for now in my head. Protecting Land of Old is not easy these days but we forge ahead and try....it's the "umph" we have to all go through to have that TRIUMPHANT moment.Cherish the ground you walk on today, the same ground some of you may be sleeping on or the home that is placed on it. We wash our feet and body from what she leaves on us each day for she is with us always protecting us through the night in allowing us to lay down our heads. The way she cradles us, the way she cares for us in food and water, the greenery she projects to give us oxygen to breathe. With all that 'Aina gives to us daily, we must stand at her side to protect her for it is only the right thing to do.
Read more…
In my long past battes I remember the ruling of Judge Ibarra. Judge Ibarra and my parents were auto drag strip racers in the 60's & early 70's. My mom would say, "...that Ibarra was cool during race days, now he one strict Judge man." Here's an insight to Judge Ibarra's ruling as taken from www.kamakani.org/old/alaloa.html :"In a recent ruling issued by Judge Ronald Ibarra concerning the Hokulia subdivision in South Kona. Judge Ibarra issued a final judgment that Hokulia is to restore the "circle-island" ala loa trail and that the trail is public property under the Highway Act of 1892. Though it's too early to know if this decision will affect "lateral access" concerns here in North Kohala, the existence and location of the ala loa trail along the North Kohala Coastline has been an ongoing issue for some time. Surety Kohala, over the years, has never acknowledged the existence of this trail and establishing public access along the circle-island ala loa trail has been difficult since there are no maps in existence predating 1892. Judge Ibarra's ruling is important because it has found that the state has a duty to protect the ala loa "found on all the islands" and "must take whatever action is necessary" to reclaim this trail - "even if the trail cannot be found on a map"."This brings to mind the Maunalani hotel being constructed as far as roadways, they had an unusual experience as the stories told by my pure filipinio grand uncle in regards to "The King's Trail":Uncle said that when they were working on the roads they knew there was a trail but when they tried to clear the main entrance of the hotel where the trail was, they would come back the next morning as if it was untouched and machines left as they were. They did this about 5-6 times all the while machines would breakdown or not start or operate improperly, guys got sick or severely hurt and one even died. They started wearing Ti-leaf on their persons and would say "Excuse me" each time they felt "chicken skin" in a work area. Today the area is set in red dirt stone roughly done; so that you know you are traveling across it making it "KNOWN". There are other spiritual "chicken skin" stories I can tell you all later about Maunalani but getting back to "Ala Loa"....I am aware of the island of Maui addressing the Ala Loa per information I found on a website: http://www.mountaintravelguide.com/Hawaii/Maui/Hiking/KeAlaLoaOMaui.htmStill another as Senator Akaka addressing it as the Ala Kahakai National Historic Trail Act: http://akaka.senate.gov/~akaka/speeches/990323.htmlWhen we use this information I've provided to you above for initial reference, ie: Judge Ibarra & Senator Akaka, it is a means of setting change - we can all protect our coastline from developements whether small individual dwellings or proposed tourist accommodations, or a large company investment through stopping the permits from being filed and be a watchdog for it. Just think, we conquor the coastlines, we then go after protecting other trails mauka and lateral and we have a good movement. Remember, we must protect the past to preserve our future,A reminder for those wanting to build on our sacred and historical sites, sites can not be blessed today to allow "permission" by spirit. There are no known na Kahuna of our past to clear energy and make things right. There were "special" na Kahuna for specific protocols. A Kahu can not replace these special Kahuna working wih dieties and what I say is true today as Maunalani has not been the same with soo many problems they have faced and they try so hard to regain their "STAR RATING". After "a current day blessing" spirit may allow things to happen but when it comes to disrespect, there's a time limit on tolerance. Makes me wonder why Kamehameha Highway on Oahu is always having so much death these days. Makes me sad too that the blood of those lost on that highway has had to suffer in "the tolerance".
Read more…