Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Kingdom Document No. 2011 - 2000 Opposition to S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, as amended herein, S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, C.D. 1., etc includes SB1555 CD1, 

Reply
|
Amelia Gora to president, comments, mayor, mayor, mayor, mayor, governor.aberc., hpd, hpd,  
show details 12:55 AM (0 minutes ago)  



 



U.S. President Barack Obama
Governor Neil Abercrombie
Many Interested Others

Re:  Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Kingdom Document No. 2011 - 2000 Opposition to S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, as amended herein,  S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, C.D. 1., etc includes SB1555 CD1, quietly signed into law by the governor on May 20 as Act 55, will create a potentially very powerful Public Land Development Corporation to implement Lim’s strategy for privatizing public resources, etc.. from Amelia Gora, a Royal person, In Esse, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs

Greetings,

This is to inform you opposition to S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, as amended; S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, C.D. 1, etc. includes SB1555 CD1, quietly signed into law by the governor on May 20 as Act 55, will create a potentially very powerful Public Land Development Corporation to implement Lim’s strategy for privatizing public resources, etc. is  hereby documented, along with all or similar bills, laws similar or likened to,  the Akaka Bill, etc.


Because Kamehameha's descendants exist, King David Kalakaua's descendants heirs/exist, and Queen Liliuokalani descendants/ heirs exist.

Premeditation of assuming the Hawaiian Islands are on record.

Placing Queen Liliuokalani under duress, stress, coercion, usurpation, etc. is on record.

Queen Liliuokalani documented that the U.S. breached the Law of Nations/treaty(ies) broken.

Placing Queen Liliuokalani's subjects /citizens numbering 40,000 under duress, stress, coercion, usurpation, etc. is on record.

Genocide activities has been discovered, uncovered in research and is on record.  Includes Kalaupapa the leper colony, etc.

Criminal greed is on record, includes criminal conversions, fraud, deceit, treason, etc.

Criminal claims to Pearl Harbor made by American businessmen, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees, the U.S. government, etc.

Failure to protect the lives, health, safety of all in the Hawaiian Islands are on record.  See attached articles about GMO/Genetic Modification Organisms; cell phones; water; toxins in the environment,

Many other facts are on record:

The latest - June 2011: 

http://theglobalrealm.com/2011/06/13/why-hawaii-is-not-a-illegitimate-state-what-the-birthers-missed/

Why Hawai’i is Not a Legitimate State: What the Birthers Missed

Why Hawai’i is Not a Legitimate State:  What the Birthers Missed

By THOMAS NAYLOR
CounterPunch.org
June 10 – 12, 2011

In the brouhaha over whether President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii or not, few seem to realize, that in the eyes of many historians and legal scholars, Hawaii is not a legitimate state of the United States of America. If the government of Hawaii had not been illegally overthrown in 1893 by the U.S. Marines through a classic act of Manifest Destiny and American-style gunboat diplomacy, Hawaii would still be an independent, sovereign nation today.

Notwithstanding a series of clever illegal moves by the U.S. government, Hawaii cannot be considered a legally bona fide state of the United States. In 1898 the United States unilaterally abrogated all of Hawaii’s existing treaties and purported to annex it on the basis of a Congressional resolution. Two years later the U.S. illegally established the so-called Territory of Hawaii on the basis of the spurious Organic Act. After a period of prolonged belligerent occupation by the U.S., Hawaii was placed under United Nations Charter, Article 73, as a “non-self-governing territory” under the administrative authority of the United States. Then in 1959 the U.S. falsely informed the U.N. that Hawaii had become the 50th state of the United States after an illegal plebiscite. Among those allowed to vote in this invalid election were members of the U.S. military and their dependents stationed in Hawaii. In other words, Hawaii’s occupiers were permitted to vote on its future.

In November 1993, President Bill Clinton signed Public Law 103-150 apologizing to the 140,000 Native Hawaiians, who call themselves Kanaka Maoli, for the January 17, 1893, invasion of Hawaii deposing Queen Liliuokalani which led to Hawaii’s illegal annexation by the United States and eventually to statehood in 1959. This apology implicitly recognized the unrelinquished inherent sovereignty and right of self-determination of the Native Hawaiian people.

Whether it was his intention or not, President Bill Clinton clearly raised the expectations of the Kanaka Maoli that one day Hawaii might once again be viewed as an independent nation-state. The downtrodden Kanaka Maoli, who make up less than 12 percent of Hawaii’s population, “die younger, earn less, go to jail more frequently, and are more likely to be homeless than any other ethnic group in the islands,” according to the Honolulu Weekly.

If Barack Obama were born in Hawaii, and his birth certificate says that he was, then why has he shown so little interest in the plight of Native Hawaiians? Bill Clinton has done a lot more for the Kanaka Maoli than Barack Obama, even though Obama pretends to be a compassionate liberal.

At one level, it matters not whether President Obama was born in Hawaii, Kenya, Indonesia, or Saudi Arabia. The real issue is how does he behave. Therein lies the rub. Not unlike his friend Donald Trump, Obama has a very strong predisposition towards violence and war, caters almost exclusively to the rich and powerful, and palls around with the right wing government of Israel.

Hawaii became an alleged state of the United States as a result of a foreign policy based on full spectrum dominance and imperial overstretch – the same foreign policy employed by Obama over a century later in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, and Palestine.

President Obama’s benign neglect of the Hawaiian victims of American nineteenth century imperialism says more about who he is than the name of the country on his birth certificate.

Thomas H. Naylor is Founder of the Second Vermont Republic and Professor Emeritus of Economics at Duke University. His books include: Downsizing the U.S.A., Affluenza, The Search for Meaning and The Abandoned Generation: Rethinking Higher Education

http://www.counterpunch.org/naylor06102011.html

 

********************************************************************************

2011 - Tane Inciong:

Reasons Why We Are Not Part of the United States of America...

Using their own U.S. and fake-State of Hawaii constitutions and laws and their Apology Bill, we can see where they "shoot themselves in their feet".  Add to that the much discounted and over-looked Ku'e Petitions against annexation (Sept. 1897) whereby approximately 96% of the bona fide subjects of the Kingdom of Hawai'i responded against it which can be considered a plebiscite of its citizens.  This Ku'e Petitions answers the Turpie Resolution of 31 May 1894.  
The fact that U.S. Secretary James L. Blaine's advice, supported later  by then U.S. President Benjamin Harrison and others within the U.S. government and community, was to destabilize the Kingdom of Hawaii without setting international precedent culminated in 1887 and conspired to overthrow and take control of the Kingdom of Hawaii for the purpose of annexing its territory to the United States of America for dominance within the Pacific Ocean for its Imperialism and Expansionism.  This led to the active invasion and belligerent occupation unlawfully executed in 1893 by settting up a puppet "Provisional Government"/Republic of Hawai'i.
 
After the Treaty of Annexation was twice rejected, first withdrawn by newly-elected President Cleveland from U.S.. Congress and Executive Agreement established; then another treaty that was rejected by  U.S. Congress, The Presidential-successor, McKinley allowed Congress to internally create the unlawful Newlands Resolution to annex Hawaii on 12 August 1898.  This blatantly ignored the Presidential Agreement and the contested Ku'e Petitions of September 1897 and continued setting precedence in the international arena and double-standard justice.                      
    
 
It is noteworthy to review the Organic Act of 30 April 1900: 
Section 4. Citizenship.  That all persons who were citizens of the Republic of Hawaii on August 12, 1898 are hereby declared (!) to be citizens of the U.S. and citizens of the Territory of Hawai'i. -U.S. citizens that reside in Territory of Hawaii for one year on or since 12 August 1898 shall be citizens of the Territory of Hawaii.  (This secured U.S. citizens who came to tip the population count for U.S. control  to remain as permanent residence without losing their nationality and freedom to travel between the U.S. and Hawaii without a passport.  The Ku'e Petitions of 1897 confirms that the bona fide subjects of the Kingdom of Hawaii did not support the Republic of Hawaii and therefore not citizens of the ipso facto government.)
 
- Chinese Ban was applied.
-Puerto Rican did not lose political status by removing to Hawaii in 1901 but became U.S. citizens, hence, entitled to vote in Hawaii.
-24 March 1934 - Filipino placed on quota basis as aliens. Specifically inapplicable in Hawaii and immigration is determined by the Department of the Interior on basis of industrial needs.  Filipino national in Hawaii became alien by proclamation of Philippine Independence.
- A person born in the Kingdom of Hawaii of British parents domiciled there was held to be a citizen of the Republic of Hawaii although he was registered at birth at the British consulate and had never renounced allegiance to the British Crown nor sworn allegiance to the Hawaiian government.   (you can see U.S. preference for caucasians.)

 
The Admission Act (18 March 1959): 
Section 19.  Nothing contained in this Act shall operate to confer United States nationality nor to terminate nationality heretofore  lawfully acquired, or restore nationality heretofore lost under any law of the (U.S.) or under any treaty to which the (U.S.) is or was a party.
 
(Since we were never lawfully citizens of the Republic of Hawaii as deemed by the Ku'e Petitions, U.S. belligerent occupation and never relinquished our rights as Hawaiian subjects, the U.S. breaches of the treaties, the U.S. violation of the law of occupation, law of neutrality, violations of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, the Constitution and Laws of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and the treaties between both countries; we are still Hawaiian subjects of the Kingdom of Hawaii.)
 
A Hawaii patriot,
 
Tane

 

******************************
**************************************************

1993 - Admission of some of the criminal acts were made and signed into law by U.S. President William Clinton as P.L. 103-150.

International Attorneys documented the wrongs:

1.  Dr. Boyle  http://www.alohaquest.com/archive/boyle_excerpts.htm

The United States of America is "...admitting that the invasion, overthrow, occupation, annexation, starting in 1893, on up, violated all the treaties, violated basic norms of international law, and the United States Constitution... the overthrow of a lawful government... Under international law when you have a violation of treaties of this magnitude, the World Court has ruled that the only appropriate remedy is restitution."

"...now the United States government, after one hundred years, has finally and officially conceded, as a matter of United States law, that Native Hawaiian people have the right to restore the Independent Nation State that you had in 1893 when the United States government came and destroyed it. And also then that as a matter of international law the Native Hawaiian people have the right to go out now and certainly proclaim the restoration of that State... this resolution clears up all these matters... You don't need to petition Congress to do it. Congress has given you everything you need right here to do it, if that's what you want to do. The United Nations Charter provides the rest of the authority to do it."

"Congress is effectively conceding now that the (1959 statehood) vote is meaningless, as a matter of international law and United States domestic law. So you're not bound by it. Rather I'm suggesting you're now free to determine your own fate pursuant to the principal of self-determination."

"The State of Hawai'i, the federal government, are... the civilian arms of the military occupation authority, and... do not have sovereign powers. The sovereignty resides in the people."

"Who's land is it? Well, from what Congress seems to be saying, it's the land of the Native Hawaiians. The Native Hawaiian people still have sovereignty... You can't trespass on your own land. The trespassers then become the State of Hawai'i, and the land developers, and the golf courses, and the resorts. You are simply the Native Hawaiians asserting your rights under international law... this reversal of positions, between who is the criminal and who is the victim, who is asserting their rights and who is violating their rights, has been effectively conceded by Congress."

"... these are official findings of fact and law, by the Congress of the United States. These findings bind all state and federal courts here in Hawai`i."

"As a litigator before the International Court of Justice, I would be able to take this law to the World Court, and say, 'The United States government has now officially conceded that it illegally invaded and occupied the Kingdom of Hawai`i, and for this reason the native people of Hawai`i would be entitled to a restoration of their independent status as a sovereign nation state.'"

"I could not predict how long this would take, what would be the consequences, how many states will recognize you, but I take it that the plight of the Hawaiian people is generally well known in the world, and there's a great deal sympathy ...it might be that you would be able to obtain recognition quickly. And especially if you pursue this process in accordance with principals of peaceful, non-violent struggle. And I submit that's the most effective technique you have today... Gandhi threw the mighty British Empire out of India without using force. People power, what we call it today. And I submit that the Native Hawaiian people would be able to do the same thing, moving in this direction and adopting the techniques of peaceful, non-violent action, which is what Gandhi called for."

"I would certainly caution you against trying to seek the same type of treatment that the federal government has doled out to the Native Americans. Moreover, on the basis of this statute, you're entitled to a lot more..."

"...an Independent Sovereign Nation State is one way a people who are threatened with extermination by means of genocide can attempt to protect themselves... What is the best way to protect the existence of your people, as a people? ...to proclaim your own State, and then ultimately seek international recognition and finally UN membership..."

"...it's your future and that of your children and your children's children that is at stake."

What are the Criteria ... How can it be done?

Territory
"First, a fixed territory, and clearly we have the Hawaiian Archipelago... Who's land is it? Well, from what congress seems to be saying, it's the land of the Native Hawaiians. The Native Hawaiian people still have sovereignty. The sovereignty inheres in you. And now it is for you to decide what to do with this sovereignty... the title to the land rested and still rests, under international law, with the Native Hawaiian people."

Population
"Second, a population, a distinguishable population of people, the Native Hawaiians, those who would trace their ancestry back before the appearance of Europeans on these lands... Certainly the Hawaiian state could take the position that you'll set up a procedure to provide citizenship to all people who are habitual residents of the new State of Hawaii as of a certain date... on a level of equality with everyone else."

Government
"Third, a government, and here you have ... the Kupuna (Elders) Council, that you've traditionally had. You don't need a government along the lines of the federal government of the United States or the State of Hawai`i to have a government. Rather what you need is a way to organize your people to govern your relations among each other, and clearly you have that."

International Relations
"And fourth, the capacity to enter into international relations, to deal with other states, and to keep your commitments. As I understand it, there are already states in the Western Pacific region that support the Native Hawaiian people and probably would be prepared to give you diplomatic recognition as an independent state... You would probably obtain recognition in that capacity from a fairly large number of states."

 


See Full text of Boyle's testimony



2.  Dr. Matthew Craven

http://www.hawaiiankingdom.org/pdf/Continuity_Hawn_Kingdom.pdf

1998 -  In Williamson B. C. Chang’s brief in Civ. No. 98-0559-02 (Condemnation) dated July 29, 1998 on page 2 with Affidavit:
"Hawaii and the United States were separate and independent nations prior to July 7, 1898. This Court may take judicial notice of that fact. No act of Congress, no Act of the Congress of the United States, no act of any Congress in the world can, without more, result in the incorporation of the territory of another nation." 1
1 See Exchange of remarks, Senators Allen and Stewart, 55th Cong. 2 d Session. 31 Cong. Rec. 6369 (Senator Stewart taking the position that the resolution was mere "puffing," in that the United States can "annex the world" if Congress so chose.) No nation has that power and not nation ever will have that power. Equally true, no nation can suffer the loss of its lands by "joint resolution." It is not simply an illegal act - it is an impossible act. See Statement of Senator Foraker admitting Joint Resolution cannot annex Hawaii. 55th Cong. 2d Sess. 31 Cong. Rec. 6585.
Page 5: "No one claimed that Congress had power beyond the boundaries of the United States".
The following is regarding "The legislative history is more than clear: Congress deliberately sought to deny the Courts of the State of hawaii in rem jurisdiction."3 "Public Law 86-3 is the sole basis by which this Court derives its very existence, let alone its powers."
"3 Leaders of both the Republic of Hawaii and the United States were well aware of this fact. See Correspondence of Sanford Dole, President of Hawaii to A. Hartwell, dated November 15, 1899 from the State Archives of Hawaii ("A reference to the joint resolution of annexation and the treaty shows clearly the untenable position of the President’s order in that it attempts to affect land transfers made between July 7, and August 12, 1898; for the treaty by Article 1st agrees that the Hawaiian Islands be annexed to the united States under the name of the Territory of Hawaii;") the joint resolution changes this in a most radical way in the first paragraph by annexing the Hawaiian islands "as a part of the territory of the United States." The Treaty agreement having been departed from in this important particular by the joint resolution, it cannot be of course contended that the letter has an authority in relations to the Hawaiian Islalnds until it was accepted by us which acceptance took place on the 12th of August 1898." The protracted debate over the Joint Resolution had brought this fact to public attention. No one claimed that Congress had power beyond the boundaries of the United States."
Professor Williamson Chang under penalty of perjury stated the following:
He is licensed to practice in the State of Hawaii and before the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and that he is now the attorney for Rachel B. Painter and appears on her behalf in the above entitled matter.
That he as filed a complaint in the United States District court for the District of Columbia that relates to this case.
Said action is titled, Painter v. The United States of America, LCIV98001737 and was filed on July 10, 1998.
That said action is related in that it seeks declaratory relief as to the scope and meaning of the Act of Admission, Section Two.
That Section Two of the Act of Admission excludes the Island of Palmyra from the State of Hawaii. That such was the intent of section two.
That the same section two also excludes the island of Oahu, on which the property here is located. That the legislative history of section two supports this plain reading of section two.
That said section two states that:
"The State of Hawaii hall consist of all the islands, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters, included in the Territory of Hawaii, except the atoll known as Palmyra Island, together with its appurtenant waters and territorial reefs, but said State shall not be deemed to include the Midway Islands, San Island (offshore of Johnston Island) or Kingman Reef, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters."
That the area within the Territory of Hawaii was set by section two of the Act of april 30, 1900, which states:
"That the islands acquired by the United States of America under an Act of Congress entitled ‘Joint Resolution to provide for annexing the Hawaiian Islands to the United States,’ approved July seventh eighteen hundred and ninety eight, shall be known as the Territory of Hawaii."
That he is aProfessor of Law at the University of Hawaii, William s. Richardson School of Law.
That among his duties as a Professor of Law he has been required to develop courses in Native Hawaiian Rights and Legal History.
That he received a grant from the National Science foundation to study the evolution of property rights in Hawaii.
14. That he shall attach, when certified by the Library of Congress, copies of various documents relating to this motion. That said certified documents should be available within two weeks.
That in the course of fulfilling the terms of the above grant, and in the course of his duties as a Professor of Law at the University of Hawaii, assigned to Native Hawaiian Rights and Legal History that the following documents have come to his attention:
The records of the debates on the Joint Resolution to Provide for Annexing the Hawaiian Islands, from the debates on that resolution of the United States Senate, particularly those pages of the Congressional Record, volume 31 pages 6331-6369, 6634-6634 and 6585-6572 chich contain statements of numerous senators that the Joing Resolution was not a treaty, and could not have any effect on Hawaii.
Records of the debates on the Act of april 30, 1900, which show that the Joint Resolution, as viewed by the Senate two years later did not incorporate Hawaii as territory of the United States. Those statements are on various pages of volume 33 of the Congressional Record, such as 2385-2391.
The supreme Court Record as found in the Library of Congress, the Law Library thereof,for the case Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197 (1903). The decision itself, together with the record of briefs of appellee and appellant in that matter show 1) that the Supreme Court ruled that the Joing Resolution did not incorporate the Hawaiian Islands as territory of the United States and that 2) the Appellee, then Territory of Hwaii took the position that the Joint Resolution did not make Hawaiii part of the United Sttes. (See brief of appellant Edmund Dole, Attorney General of the Territory of Hawaii.)
Other documents, such as volume 23 of the Opinions of the Attorney General of the United States, numerous opinions of the Attorney General state that the Joint Resolution did not incorporate Hawaii as part of the United States. In particular, Hawaii remained separate and independent for numerous purposes identified only with the rights of a sovereign and independent nation: to wit Hawaii was permitted to lay a tonnage tax on shipping between Hawaii and the United States, Hawaii was deemed separate and sovereign for the purposes of claims by British subjects arising from torts allegedly committed against them by the Provisional Government of Hawaii and Hawaii was not "the United States" for the purposes of the existing laws of the United States excluding Chinese.
House Report 305 pf the 55th Congress which shows that the ceremonies held on August 12, 1898, in Honolulu, Hawaii had no legal effect. That is also the opinion of the United States Attorney General as stated in volume 23, relating to the "Public Lands" See pages 628 et seq.
Documents that show the intent behind section two of the Admission Act: That in the deliberations on the Statehood bill, S.49 in 1953-54, the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs committee rejected the language defining the boundaries for the future state of Hawaii, as then proposed in the draft of the State Constitution approved by the people of Hawaii November 7, 1950.
That the reasons for such rejection are partly stated in a "confidential memo" of Clark Clifford to Senator Earle Clements. That such memo notes that the definition of the State, as proposed by the people would differ from the definition of the State as set forth by the Senate in S. 49. That the Senate must reject the definition as proposed by the State Constitution. That the people of Hawaii must affirm the changes as demanded by the Senate. That, according to Clark, if the Constitution is not amended, either by reassembling the Constitutional Convention, or by a vote specially held prior to statehood, then Hawaii should not be admitted as a state.
That numerous proposed alternatives to the present boundaries of the State were considered by the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs Committee, and that such alternatives would have included the Palmyra Islands as well as the Island of Oahu. That such alternatives were rejected in favor of the present language. That the present language is identical to Committee Print 6 of S.49. Committee Print 6 adopts the approach of Committee Print 5. Committee Print 5 differs substantially from all earlier versions as committee Print 5 states that the area of the State shall consist of that of the Territory, except the atoll known as Palmyra. That Print 4 and earlier prints, contained such language that would have included all islands within a certain designated parallelogram as defined by reference to longitude and attitude. That such approach was recommended by the Department of Justice, in a letter of J. Lee Rankin of January 11, 1954. Those approached would have affirmatively included islands within the new state. Thus, the adoption of the prsent language displays conscious intent to exclude all islands.
That said approach continued the existing policy of Congress whereby the Territory was defined by reference to the legal effect of the Joint Resolution.
That certain Senators on the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs committee were well aware that the Joint Resolution did not acquire for the United States either the island of Palmyra or the Island of Oahu. That such knowledge can be imputed from the transcripts of the Senate Interior and Insular Affairs committee, as to a non-public hearing of March 17, 1953. Such knowledge can be imputed to Senator Clinton Anderson who was so informed that the Joint Resolution did not incorporate the Hawaiian Islands by memorandum in April of 1954.
That the plain meaning of section two is supported by the available legislative history.
That this motion is brought arising from counsel’s duty under the Code of Professional Responsibility to zealously represent his clients. That said grounds for this motion are basic and elementary. The boundaries of the State are within the knowledge of those who practice beforee the Bar of the Courts of this State. That said counsel is not bringing this motion for the purposes of delay or harassment. Rather, the failure to raise this issue, in the course of representation would be possible grounds for incompetent representation.
Under Pentaly of Perjury, I, Williamson Chang states that such are true and correct, the documentary evidence referred to does exist and was found and examined by myself, in various archives and libraries, including the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress.
AFFIANT FURTHER SAYETH NAUGHT.
(Signed)
Williamson B. C. Chang
Subscribed and Sworn to Before Me:
This Wed. Day of 29 July, 1998.
(signed)
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF HAWAII
My Commission Expires: 9-5-99
L.S.



Articles/References Affecting ALL LANDS in the Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaiian Islands/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Kingdom/ Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian government from the time of Paiea/ Kamehameha, including Coral Reefs, etc.:

 


Kamehameha III's First Laws found at the Mission Houses Archives, behind Kawaiahao Church: https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wZGIyMmNkNTMtZTczZ i0...
****************************** ***********
Premeditation to Assume Pearl Harbor Coaling Station/the Hawaiian Islands - a Standing Order by Congress Eight (8) days BEFORE DETHRONING QUEEN LILIUOKALANI in 1893:
Page 1: https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wZmFmMWE3YjEtNTAwM y0...
Page 2: https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2RlYzdiOWMtNWJkY S0...
****************************** ******

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70E10FB3D5E10738DDDAF0894DD405B8185F0D3

PEARL HARBOR ARTICLE: 

President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyN i0...
****************************** *****
Genealogies 1867 (first part) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wMzBiZGJhMjMtY2FmZ C0...
Genealogies 1867 (second part) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wZDBjMDAyNjktMWQ1M i0...
Genealogies 1867 (third and last part) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wOTRlZmNhMDEtNGFkM S0...
************************
Annexation Opposition by Queen Liliuokalani found by researcher Kiliwehi Kekumano: https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wOGJmZjg4MmQtNWRjM S0...
Annexation Opposition (page 2) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wNWVlMTc0MjEtZWZiZ S0...
Annexation Opposition (page 3) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wY2RjYzZmNjQtMjUxY i0...
Annexation Opposition (page 4) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wNmY2Mzk3ZTctZDEyM y0...
***************************
The Hawaiian Disgrace http://query.nytimes.com/mem/ archive-free/pdf?res= F70A1FF7345D117...
Shameful Conspiracy https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2Y2YjAwOTItOTEwM C0...
******************************
Prince Kuhio Kalanianaole Treasonous Person introduced Statehood in 1920 https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wMzY0NzE3ZDUtZGE5M i0...
******************************

Reasons Why Anyone Can Document/Press Charges/ Document Pirates http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/reasons-why-anyone-can

***********************************

Know About Pearl Harbor http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/know-about-pearl-harbor-more

***********************************

Updated Hawaiian History http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/important-keep-for-your

***********************************

Congress Premeditated Declared War upon a Neutral, Non Violent, Friendly Nation http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/only-congress-can-initiate-war

***********************************

Updated Royal Genealogies http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/updating-the-royal-families

************************************

In Defense of Kanaka Maoli http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/in-defense-of-kanaka

*************************************

One World Order = The Monroe Doctrine Extended  http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/one-world-order-the-monroe

************************************

Reviewing the Claimed Royal Societies http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/reviewing-the-claimed-royal

************************************

Pirates at Work with OHA in Tow  http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/tom-lenchanko-pirates-at-work-1

************************************

Animosities in the Hawaiian Islands - Cartoons of Queen Liliuokalani depicted as a "Nigger" , etc.  http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/animosities-in-the-hawaiian

************************************

Wiki Leaks:  It Was All About Oil includes my article(s) http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/wikileaks-it-was-all-about

*********************************************

Reasons Why the Entity State FAILS: Premeditation; Treasonous Persons Piracy(ies); Deaths of Royalists; Lies, Criminals, Pirates Supported by the U.S. etc.; Truth and Oppositions Documented....... http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/reasons-why-the-entity-state

**********************************************************************************************

The "Pretended Owners" ARE NOT THE REAL OWNERS OF HAWAIIAN LANDS! Frauds Found In History compiled by Amelia Gora, a Royal person (2010)    and other articles

http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/the-pretended-owners-are-not

**********************************************************************************************
WAR Declared on our Neutral, Friendly, Non-Violent Nation   http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/war-was-declared-on-our

**********************************************************************************************
More Premeditation Records  http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/important-keep-for-your-1

**********************************************************************************************
Genocide Activists, Monstah Makers GMO's, etc.  http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/genocide-activists-monster


More Reasons Why the Entity State of Hawaii FAILS to Protect the Lives and Safety of all citizens in the Hawaiian Islands:

From Christie Gora:

'Hawaii water pollution and hazards':
http://www.examiner.com/going-green-in-honolulu/hawaii-water-hazards-and-pollution

Here is the pollution violations in Hawaii 2008: (also in my 'Hawaii water pollution and hazards' article)
http://projects.nytimes.com/toxic-waters/polluters/hawaii

What the state is doing now and has a November 01, 2011 deadline for 2012 submissions of toxicology of pollutions at their facilities (which I also had listed in my 'Hawaii water pollution and hazards' article):
http://hawaii.gov/health/environmental/env-planning/wqm/wqm.html

Here's one of my popular articles 'Is Hawaii surrounded by trash island?':
http://www.examiner.com/going-green-in-honolulu/is-hawaii-surrounded-by-trash-island



I have more articles too, and a couple of them became popular.
http://www.examiner.com/green-in-honolulu

Here is one about 'Hawaii cellphones and wi-fi risks':
http://www.examiner.com/going-green-in-honolulu/hawaii-walking-mobile-microwave-cellphone-risks




Here is the evidence of GMO "contributions" to Hawaii democrats in congress of now:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cycle=2010&cmte=C00042069
These democrats are: Inouye, Daniel K (D-HI) $7,000;  Hanabusa, Colleen (D-HI) $1,000; Hirono, Mazie K (D-HI) $5,000  
Here is a GMO video 'Island at risk: GMO in Hawaii':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQDOdnRBLqc&feature=player_embedded

Why lolo's go on Kaho'olawe?
The islands are contaminated with carcinogens and fully blown with radiation (no pun intended)...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6iVUNHLJBw&list=UL

The following videos are good to watch.
Although I just recently found these videos after the fact that I wrote my articles, it's great to see that I can relate in Environmental studies. :)

Hawaii is contaminated with toxins, radiation and carcinogenic ecosystem (land, air, water).
So here is a video on 'Bottled water':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se12y9hSOM0&feature=player_embedded



What's in cosmetics, shampoos / conditioners, foods, toys, sunblocks, etc..?  Thanks to 'nanotechnology', there's risks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfq000AF1i8&list=UL

I also wrote an article about it called 'Hawaii's green tans and makeup':
http://www.examiner.com/going-green-in-honolulu/hawaii-s-green-tans



Here is the story about electronics:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sW_7i6T_H78&list=UL

The article I wrote is called 'Hawaii: Donate a used computer to children, recycle and more':
http://www.examiner.com/going-green-in-honolulu/hawaii-recycle-your-computers-and-electronics-info-here

******************************************************************************
Reviewing the Crown Lands and Other Issues http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/more-of-the-best-of-the-iolani

******************************************************************************
White House Website - Letter to the President from Amelia Gora:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/formsubmissions/54/c1dc2d2b35964f0392b21da2d9b05b42.pdf

*****************************************************************************
What Every Kanaka Maoli Needs To Know http://amelia-gora.blogspot.com/2011/01/keep-for-records-with-other-articles.html

**************************************************************************

BMJ/British Medical Journal articles:  http://www.bmj.com/content/325/7378/1482.abstract

*************************************************************************

 

IOLANI - The Royal Hawk news on the web www.theiolani.blogspot.com

yahoogroups.com see hawaiian genealogy society and http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/ GORA8037

http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037 and other websites including OPED News, etc.

****************************************************************************

Multiples of Affidavits/Liens filed at the Bureau of Conveyances, Honolulu, Oahu;  Documents served to the DLNR, AG's, et. als. pertaining to the Crown Lands, etc. as one of the Owners, descendant/heir of the Crown Land Owners whose ancestors resided in the Hawaiian Islands for 3,000+ years, etc.

Oppositions documented over time recorded in Affidavits/Liens, Letters filed, delivered, served on the Occupiers who have no title or ownership of lands, etc.

Oppositions documented in court cases; Fraud documented in court cases as well by myself, family(ies).

Multiples of Letters to the U.S. Presidents Clinton, GW Bush, Barack Obama, Governors Lingle, Abercrombie, Cayetano also thru the Attorney General's office, Senator Akaka, Senator Inouye, et. als.

*********************************************************************

Some Research by other researchers:  http://maoliworld.ning.com/profiles/blogs/information-concerning-the

*********************************************************************

Once again, costs for rents and leases are due and owing to our Royal Families and

Rents, leases due are 500 Trillion Dollars in Gold Coin per year, retroactive to 1893; land use, water, resources, etc.

and knowing, recognizing that you are NOT the Hawaiian government, but an entity as documented by Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 which was supported by the U.S., et. als. (includes England, and the Morgan bankers, International bankers/Bank of England, etc.).

And repeating what was posted above in part:

This is to inform you opposition to S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, as amended; S.B. No. 1520, S.D. 2, H.D. 3, C.D. 1, etc. includes SB1555 CD1, quietly signed into law by the governor on May 20 as Act 55, will create a potentially very powerful Public Land Development Corporation to implement Lim’s strategy for privatizing public resources, etc. is  hereby documented, along with all or similar bills, laws similar or likened to,  the Akaka Bill, etc.


Because Kamehameha's descendants exist, King David Kalakaua's descendants heirs/exist, and Queen Liliuokalani descendants/ heirs exist.

Premeditation of assuming the Hawaiian Islands are on record.

Placing Queen Liliuokalani under duress, stress, coercion, usurpation, etc. is on record.

Queen Liliuokalani documented that the U.S. breached the Law of Nations/treaty(ies) broken.

Placing Queen Liliuokalani's subjects /citizens numbering 40,000 under duress, stress, coercion, usurpation, etc. is on record.

Genocide activities has been discovered, uncovered in research and is on record.  Includes Kalaupapa the leper colony, etc.

Criminal greed is on record, includes criminal conversions, fraud, deceit, treason, etc.

Criminal claims to Pearl Harbor made by American businessmen, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees, the U.S. government, etc.

Failure to protect the lives, health, safety of all in the Hawaiian Islands are on record.  See attached articles about GMO/Genetic Modification Organisms; cell phones; water; toxins in the environment,

Many other facts are on record:

The latest - June 2011: 

http://theglobalrealm.com/2011/06/13/why-hawaii-is-not-a-illegitimate-state-what-the-birthers-missed/

Why Hawai’i is Not a Legitimate State: What the Birthers Missed



Continued activities intended to affect the true land owners, Sovereigns, descendants/heirs of Paiea/Kamehameha, Liholiho/ Kamehameha II, Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III, Alexander Liholiho/Kamehameha IV, Lot Kamehameha/ Kamehameha V, William Charles /King William Lunalilo, Kalakua/Kalakaua/ King David Kalakaua, Kaeha/Makaeha/Kamakaeah/Queen Liliuokalani and their loyal subjects/citizens will be cause for legal action through the Honolulu Police Department based on Genocide Activities file, etc.

The perpetuation of lies, deceit, criminal activities, genocide, piracy(ies) is not acceptable.

OHA/Office of Hawaiian Affairs; the claimed Royal Societies; Hawaiian Homes organizations are but agencies set up by an entity supported by the U.S. government with designs on lands, resources, etc. of good, pono, neutral nation's subjects/citizens whose ancestors did support Queen Liliuokalani who did no wrong. 

The Wicked entities were set up by a premeditating, agressive, bankrupt, greedy bunch of thieves with wicked desires to aid their WARMONGERING ways.......intending to maintain everyone as SLAVES since the American Civil War because the debt was not paid for until 1934.

The Hawaiian Kingdom did go "under ground" and it is here.

Oppositions have been maintained and recorded over time by our families, friends of Queen Liliuokalani, Kamehameha's descendants/heirs, et. als.

                                                                               Sincerely,

                              
                                                   Amelia Gora, a Royal person, a living human being, Acting Liaison of
                                                                                 Foreign Affairs, Royal Families House of Nobles/Hulu Manu, One of the
                                                                                 Representatives of the Hawaiian Genealogical Society
**************************************************************

You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • The following article shows the nations with "observer status":

     

    http://www.towardfreedom.com/home/middle-east/2442-palestinian-stat...

    Palestinian Status at the UN: Breaking the Logjam

    E-mail Print PDF
     

     

     

    Wall in Palestine

    Wall in Palestine

    There is a good deal of discussion in the halls of the UN, both in New York and Geneva, concerning a possible application of full membership in the UN by the Palestinian Authority.  The discussions reflect similar discussions within Foreign Ministries in the hope that there can be an agreed-upon program of action (or non-action) by September when the new General Assembly meets.  Currently Palestine has observer status at the UN from a time when liberation movements were given observer status – two organizations for South Africa, one for South West Africa as Namibia was then, and for the PLO.  With the changes in South Africa and Namibia, the liberation movement observer status was dropped for the three, and only the PLO remained.

     

    In practice, there is little effective difference between observer status and full membership.  Observers can not vote, but voting in the UN has been largely replaced by ‘consensus making’. Effectiveness for all countries except for a small number of Great Powers depends on the skills of the diplomats which represent them.  The Vatican has only observer status but a good deal of influence due to an effective diplomatic team.  The Palestinian diplomats in Geneva have been weak, in New York somewhat stronger.  The Palestinian diplomats have always been in the shadows of the representatives of the Arab States who want to play ‘Big  Brother’, but with the exception of Egypt which has always had a strong core of diplomats, the Arab diplomats have rarely been more competent than the Palestinians.

    Being overshadowed by the larger Arab States would probably not change even if full membership is granted, but full membership would be a symbolic victory of legitimacy and open the door to the independent use of the World Court. As Mahmoud Abbas has written “Palestine’s admission to the United Nations would pave the way for the internationalization of the conflict as a legal matter, not only a political one.  It would also pave the way for us to pursue claims against Israel at the United Nations, human rights treaty bodies and the International Court of Justice.”

    As of now, there are a number of variations being discussed around three possible approaches:

    1. The first approach favored by the USA, some of the Western European members of the European Union, in particular Germany, and a few others including Israel is that the issue should go away. It is felt that there are enough problems in the world, especially in the Middle East not to have a complicated procedural battle in September.  This has been the ‘advice’ given to the Palestinians by the US, Canada, and some Western European States.  It may be also what some of the Arab States are saying more privately.  To reinforce their arguments, the US and the Western European governments have a strong card — they can cut off funding to the Palestinian Authority. The pretext would be the Hammas support or participation in a ‘unity government’ even if such a government is made of ‘non-political technocrats’. Hammas is still listed by the USA and the European Union as a ‘terrorist organization’ and so cannot receive funds from the US or EU governments. The Palestinian Authority depends largely on external financing; thus cutting off financing is an argument that carries weight — even if it is called ‘blackmail’ in other settings.

    In exchange for dropping the full membership application, there would be some sort of short Israel-Palestine meeting where each side would speak of a ‘peace process’ through September when the membership issue has gone by.  Such a sleight of hand will not advance real negotiations but may ‘buy time’ which is what many governments now want.

    2. There is, however, a real possibility that the Palestinian Authority will ask for full membership in September. This will depend in part on discussions among the Palestinian leadership and the views of the three key States concerning the Middle East: Egypt, Turkey, and Iran. Iran which is one of the Vice Presidents of the upcoming General Assembly will be particularly influential in procedural matters. The UN Charter states that the admission of new members “will be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”.  The Council makes its membership recommendation through a resolution; thus it must be approved by at least nine of the Council’s 15 members and not be vetoed by the one of the five permanent members.  If the USA abstains — abstentions are not considered a veto — it is likely that there would be at least nine positive votes for Palestinian membership in the Security Council.  Then it is most likely that the General Assembly would follow the Security Council recommendation as it has always done in the past.  Thus current discussions turn around what could convince the US to abstain rather than veto.  We will return to this key issue after a consideration of a third possibility.

    3. The third possibility in the case of a US veto is to move the issue to the General Assembly under what is known now as the “Uniting for Peace” mechanism.  UN General Assembly resolution 377(V) of 3 November 1950, first known as ‘the Acheson Plan’ from the name of the US Secretary of State who proposed it and later re-named Uniting for Peace states that in cases where the UN Security Council fails to act to maintain international peace and security, owing to disagreement among the five permanent members, the matter shall be discussed immediately by the General Assembly.  If the General Assembly is not in session, an Emergency Special Session can be called.  This procedure has been used 10 times since its 1950 start. (1) As from September to December, the General Assembly will be in session, a Special Session will not have to be called.  For a resolution to pass under the Uniting for Peace mechanism, there must be a 2/3 majority, meaning now 135 States if all are present and voting.  However, not being present is a ‘diplomatic’ way of not having to be seen making a choice.  Currently, 112 UN members recognize a Palestinian State within the pre-1967 frontiers.  What can not be analysed is how hard the USA and some of its allies would work to prevent the 135 positive voters.

    To turn back to the Security Council procedure, we can ask could there be a ‘deal’ that would satisfy no one completely but not dissatisfy any of the five permanent powers to the extent of their casting a veto. Here we can turn to precedent because at the UN everything functions by precedent. If something has been done once, one can argue that it can be done again. If it has never been done, it takes an exceptional situation and a few highly skilled diplomats to get any innovation.

    Thus we can turn to the 1954 period and the breaking of the ‘logjam’ on membership. During the first ‘hot round’ of the Cold War — the June 1950 to July 1953 Korean War— the Soviet Union and the USA blocked each others potential allies from UN membership. At the end of the Korean War, there was a host of pending membership applications on which no progress had been made.  There seemed to be little possibility of moving things forward.

    The 1954 membership issue was my start at looking closely at diplomatic negotiations around procedural issues at the UN. At a time when I should have spent my time chasing girls, I was a university student representative on the Executive Committee of what was then the United World Federalists in the USA. In 1955, the issue of a review conference on the UN Charter was to be placed automatically on the agenda of the General Assembly. During the 1945 negotiations that led to the creation of the UN Charter, a review conference on the Charter after 10 years was to be placed on the agenda.  This was a demand of some of the smaller States at San Francisco, in particular Australia.  It was expected in 1945 that such a review conference would be held and that was still the expectation in the period 1953-1954.  There was a good deal of reflection on how to improve and strengthen the Charter during such a Review Conference. Universal membership was one of the demands of UN reformers, both some diplomats and activists such as those in the United World Federalists who had taken a lead on the Charter Review issue.

    However, both the USA and the USSR opposed holding a Charter Review conference and brought most of their allies along with them.  The result was that when the Charter Review conference came upon on the agenda, it was swept under the rug, and there has never been a review. Nevertheless, the diplomats of the USA and the USSR felt that some of the ‘steam’ for a Review Conference had to be lowered and this could be done by getting rid of ‘universal membership’ as an issue. Negotiations to break the logjam on pending applications started with the aim of making as close-to-possible balance between pro-USA, pro-USSR and neutral States entering the UN.  The negotiations were carried out in 1954 and in 1955, before the debate on Charter Review, the membership logjam broke and Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Laos, Libya, Nepal, Portugal, Romania, Spain and Sri Lanka entered the UN. Japan should have been part of the group, but there was still the “enemy states” clause in the Charter which took more negotiations concerning Japan. Japan only came in the next year, 1956.

    Can there be something comparable in September? In an article “Coming in from the Cold: UN Membership Needed for the Phantom Repub...”, I suggested at the time of the Georgia-Abkhazia-South Ossetia conflict that Abkhazia, Chechenya, Kossovo, Nagrono-Karabakh, South Ossetia and Transnistra be given UN membership as a necessary first step for security and a lessening of tensions. I had stressed that “to find mutually acceptable forms of government in these conflicts will require political creativity (breaking out of thinking in fixed patterns) and then new forms of constitutional order such as renewed forms of federal-confederal types of government, greater popular participation in decision-making and new forms of protection of minorities.  Flexibility, compromise and cooperation are the hallmarks of success when it comes to resolving such conflicts concerning independence and autonomy.  There is a need for a healing of past animosities and a growth of wider loyalties and cooperation.”

    Both diplomats and members of the UN secretariat as well as secretariat of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe where I had also floated the idea explained in detail why such a joint membership procedure would not happen.  None the less, if we added upgrading the status of Palestine in the UN, another membership logjam might be broken.  The point I have repeatedly made is that membership does not solve difficulties; it just provides a framework where serious negotiations might be carried out.  The 1955 access to membership of Cambodia and Laos did not ‘solve’ the Indochina conflict.  The French-led war in Vietnam was still going on, to be followed a decade later by the US-led war.

    Thus, I think that a world citizen position is that full Palestinian membership in the UN will not ‘solve’ all the Israel-Palestine issues, and certainly not the issues of the wider Middle East.  However UN membership will allow the Palestinians to come out from the shadows of the Arab States and to negotiate with the Israelis as equals. This is a very modest step forward but it is worth taking.

    Rene Wadlow, Representative to the United Nations, Geneva, Association of World Citizens and editor of the on-line journal of world politics and culture: www.transnational-perspectives.org

    Note

    (1)   For a useful discussion of the background to the Uniting for Peace procedure see, Dean Acheson Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department (New York: W.W.Norton, 1969, chapters 47-51)

    Photo from Flickr by Wall in Palestine

    • The highlighted words from the above article shows the moves towards ONE WORLD government as being nearly complete less the following:

       

      Palestine has observer status at the UN from a time when liberation movements were given observer status – two organizations for South Africa, one for South West Africa as Namibia was then, and for the PLO.  With the changes in South Africa and Namibia, the liberation movement observer status was dropped for the three, and only the PLO remained.

       

      Observers can not vote,

       

      The Vatican has only observer status

       

      Arab States


      To reinforce their arguments, the US and the Western European governments have a strong card — they can cut off funding to the Palestinian Authority. The pretext would be the Hammas support or participation in a ‘unity government’ even if such a government is made of ‘non-political technocrats’. Hammas is still listed by the USA and the European Union as a ‘terrorist organization’ and so cannot receive funds from the US or EU governments. The Palestinian Authority depends largely on external financing; thus cutting off financing is an argument that carries weight — even if it is called ‘blackmail’ in other settings.


      * Palestinian Authority will ask for full membership in September.

       

      * (influences of) three key States concerning the Middle East: Egypt, Turkey, and Iran.

       

      * a world citizen position

       

      Therefore, the three nations/four nations problematic to the ONE WORLD ORDER/ NEW WORLD ORDER Momentum are:

       

      1)  Palestinians

       

      2)  The Vatican

       

      3)  Arab States

       

      4)  The Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina

       

      Now, let us view the news of the above Nations/States:

       

      1. The Palestine Review: The Latest News from Palestine. The Latest ...


        The Palestine Review News: The latest news on Palestine and the latest news on Gaza. Our latest news sources expose the racism, brutal occupation, ...
        palestinereview.com/ - Cached - Similar
      2. The Palestine Chronicle: A Leading Online Newspaper on Palestine ...


        Jun 26, 2011 – Online news magazine and journal about Palestine, Israel, the Arab world, ... while the Palestinians, as the last twenty years have shown, ...
        palestinechronicle.com/ - Cached - Similar
      3. News for Palestinians latest news

        wdwJNMtStakJ
        Sydney Morning Herald
        In the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the latest weapon — in public relations — is a video. It's not the first time the Gaza flotilla has been ...
        msnbc.com - 2692 related articles - Shared by 10+
      4. IMEMC News - International Middle East Media Center


        IMEMC is a media center developed in collaboration between Palestinian and ... This Week in Palestine week 25 2011 · Podcast Link · Latest News Articles ...
        www.imemc.org/ - Cached - Similar
      5. Palestine news, all the latest and breaking Palestinian news ...


        Palestine news, all the latest and breaking Palestinian news from telegraph.co.uk.
        www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/.../palestinianauthority/ - Similar - Add to iGoogle
      6. Israel | World news | guardian.co.uk


        Latest news and comment on Israel from guardian.co.uk. ... More than 1600 confidential Palestine papers recording Middle East peace talks with Israel and ...
        www.guardian.co.uk/world/israel - Cached - Similar
      7. BBC News - Middle East crisis


        BBC special reports: - Get the latest background, news, features, ... the Palestinians and the US - on the core issues of the Middle East conflict. ...
        www.bbc.co.uk/news/.../middle_east_crisis/ - Cached - Similar - Add to iGoogle
      8. Palestine - Latest news, videos, and information- msnbc.com


        Dec 22, 2009 – Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad is skeptical about the Palestinian bid to seek U.N. recognition of a Palestinian state, ...
        www.msnbc.msn.com/id/.../ns/world_news-palestine?q=Palestine - Cached 
      9. Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign: Latest News


        June 24/25/26/27: JOIN THE MEDIA MARATHON TO PROMOTE 'FREEDOM FOR PALESTINE' SINGLE Latest News, Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign ...
        www.stopthewall.org/news/latestnews.shtml - Palestinian Territories - Cached 
      10. Palestinian Territories news sources - the latest Palestinian ...


        Palestinian newspapers, Palestinian tabloids, Palestinian Territories news blogs, and other Palestinian news media covering Palestinian Territories sports, ...
        www.newswealth.com/Newspapers_Worldwide/.../Palestine/palestine.html 
         



      • 2)  The Vatican

         

        note:  The Vatican was and is complemented for maintaining OBEDIENCE amongst the people, and did sign the 1822 Secret Treaty of Verona, moving to set aside Monarchy governments and move towards ONE WORLD ORDER/NEW WORLD ORDER with Austria, France, Prussia, Russia, the United States, and England.

         

        1. Vatican news, all the latest and breaking Vatican City news ...


          Vatican news, all the latest and breaking Vatican City news from telegraph.co.uk.
          www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/.../vaticancityandholysee/ - Similar - Add to iGoogle
        2. Catholic News Service - Vatican


          Vatican to launch web portal that streamlines print, TV, online news ... establishment of the Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) Vatican Foundation last year. ...
          www.catholicnews.com/data/vatican/vatican.htm - Cached - Similar
        3. Pope Benedict and the Vatican News, Headlines and Latest Stories ...


          Pope Benedict XVI is now on Twitter, and personally launched the latest Vatican news website on Tuesday, June 28, 2011, and send his first tweet. ...
          old.news.yahoo.com/topics/pope-vatican - Cached 
        4. Pope Benedict and the Vatican News, Headlines and Latest Stories ...


          Pope Benedict and the Vatican News, Headlines and Latest Stories on Yahoo! News.
          news.yahoo.com/topics/pope-vatican - Cached - Similar
           
        5. Latest From Vatican - The Holy See


          WEB ARCHIVE. In memory of John Paul II on the anniversary of his death · Year for Priests (2009-2010) · VACANCY OF THE APOSTOLIC SEE · Year of the Eucharist ...
          www.vatican.va/latest/latest_en.htm - Cached - Similar
        6. The World Seen From Rome


          LATEST NEWS. [2011-06-28] 15 Advance Toward Beatification or Canonization ... [2011-06-27] Vatican Expands Online Presence at Pope's Wishes ...
          www.zenit.org/english/ - Cached - Similar
        7. YouTube - vatican's Channel‏


          This channel offers news coverage of the main activities of the Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI ... Holy See (Vatican City State). Latest news. Vatican Radio ...
          www.youtube.com/user/vatican - Cached - Similar
        8. News.va: the Vatican's official news website


          Jun 28, 2011 – On this site anyone can view the latest news from Vatican Radio, Fides, the Vatican Television Center, the Osservatore Romano and the ...
          www.romereports.com/.../Newsva-the-Vaticans-official-news-website-english-4418.html
        9. News Services - Index


          L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO · VATICAN INFORMATION SERVICE · VATICAN RADIO · VATICAN TELEVISION CENTER · ACCREDITATION · PHOTO ARCHIVE. News Services.
          press.catholica.va/ - Cached
        10. Vatican hit by gay sex scandal | World news | The Guardian


          Mar 4, 2010 – Vatican chorister sacked for allegedly procuring male prostitutes for papal ... On World news. Most viewed; Zeitgeist; Latest. Last 24 hours ...
          www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/.../vatican-gay-sex-scandal - Cached - Similar

        Ads

        1. Latest News In Israel

          Look up Latest News In Israel
          Get the Best Answers Now!
          www.ask.com/Latest+News+In+Israel

        See your ad here »



        • 3)  Arab States

           

          1. Arab World News


            Arab World News on WN Network delivers the latest Videos and Editable pages for News & Events, including Entertainment, Music, Sports, Science and more, ...
            www.arabworldnews.com/ - Cached - Similar
          2. Home - Arab News


            Wednesday, 29 June 2011 | Rajab 27, 1432 | Last updated at 19:13 ... and "unfair" regulatory provisions imposed by the two Southeast Asian countries. ...
            OIC sets up its own rights watchdog‎‏ - ‎‏38 minutes ago
            Cairo's Tahrir Square erupts anew‎‏ - ‎‏8 hours ago
            US foreign policy invigorated at the expense of Gaza‎‏ - ‎‏22 hours ago
            www.arabnews.com/ - Cached - Similar
          3. Israel News - Daily News Alert from Israel


            Jun 28, 2011 – Daily Alert is a digest of hyperlinked news and commentary on Israel and the Mideast. ... A comparative study of Arab nations and Israel on "Scientific ... Last year, the International Institute for Strategic Studies in ...
            www.dailyalert.org/ - Cached - Similar
          4. News for the arab states latest news

            cDwgujLTxM0J
            Expressing that strong economies are a necessary basis for the successful democratization of the post-Jasmine Arab world, Abrams cited an example from a ...
            International Business Times - 29 related articles
          5. Egypt News - The Protests of 2011 - The New York Times


            In order to view this feature, you must download the latest version of flash player ... Egypt, the most populous country in the Arab world, erupted in mass ...
            topics.nytimes.com › WorldCountries and Territories - Cached - Similar
          6. Op-Ed: Experts Fear Israeli Design to Balkanise Arab States ...


            Jun 18, 2011 – 'The primary objective is to weaken the Arab states of North Africa, which, ... 'And in recent years, the drive to further balkanise the Arab world - by Israel and ... Latest News Headlines. Read the latest news stories: ...
            www.globalissues.org/news/2011/06/18/10149 - Cached 
          7. Arab League states: a recent history of protests | World news ...


            Mar 22, 2011 – With the league supporting military intervention in Libya, Mark Tran looks at how member states are handling unrest at home.
            www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/22/arab-league-states-protests - Cached 
          8. UNDP | Arab States | LATEST NEWS FROM THE ARAB REGION


            FUnited Nations Development Programme fArab States bEmpowered lives. ... Latest News from the Arab Region. UNDP thanks Kuwait for generous contribution for ...
            arabstates.undp.org/subpage.php?spid=35 - Cached 
          9. The latest on the Arab world's conflicts - World - NZ Herald News


            Jun 16, 2011 – Latest developments in Arab world's unrest. Syria. Terrified Syrians run for their lives as elite army units sweep through a restive ...
            www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid... - Cached
          10. Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf: Latest News ...


            May 29, 2011 – See Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf Latest News, Photos, Biography, Videos and Wallpapers. Cooperation Council for the ...
            timesofindia.indiatimes.com › Topics - Cached
          11. The demise of the dollar - Business News, Business - The Independent


            Oct 6, 2009 – In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, ... In a graphic illustration of the new world order, Arab states have ...
            www.independent.co.ukNewsBusinessBusiness News - Cached - Similar

          • http://arabnews.com/opinion/columns/article463405.ece

            y RAMZY BAROUD | ARAB NEWS

            US foreign policy invigorated at the expense of Gaza

            US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has made a series of stern and fiery statements recently, giving the impression that war is somehow upon us once again. Oddly, Clinton’s sudden reappearance onto the Middle East diplomacy scene was triggered by the brave attempts of peace activists to break the siege on Gaza.

            In recent months, as Arab nations settled old scores with their insufferable dictators, US foreign policy started taking a backseat. Attempts at swaying Arab revolts teetered between bashful diplomatic efforts to sustain US interests — as was the case with Yemen — and military intervention, as in Libya, which is still being marketed to the US public as a humanitarian intervention, as opposed to the war it actually is.

            The indecisiveness and double standards on display are hardly new.

            The US’ stance during the Tunisian popular revolution ranged between complete lack of interest (when the protests began brewing in December 2010), to sudden enthusiasm for freedom and democracy (when the revolts led to the ousting of longtime President Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali on Jan. 14, 2011).

            The same foreign policy pendulum repeatedly swung both ways during the Egyptian uprising. The US political definitions of Hosni Mubarak shifted from that of a friendly leader to that of a loathsome dictator who had to go for the sake of Egyptian democracy.

            It took Tunisians 28 days to overthrow their leader, and Egyptians 18 days to oust Mubarak. During these periods, US foreign policy in the two countries — and the Middle East as a whole — seemed impossible to delineate in any concrete statements. Hillary Clinton was an emblematic figure in this diplomatic discrepancy.

            Now Clinton is back, speaking in a lucid language which leaves no room for misinterpretation. When it comes to the security and interests of Israel — as opposed to those of the entire Middle East region and all its nations — Clinton, like other top American officials, leaves no room for error. Israel will always come first.

            Clinton’s forceful language was triggered by the decision of humanitarian activists from over 20 countries to travel to Gaza in a symbolic gesture to challenge the Israeli blockade of one of the poorest regions on earth. The 500 peace activists on board 10 boats will include musicians, writers, Nobel Laureates, Holocaust survivors, and members of Parliament.

            “We think that it’s not helpful for there to be flotillas that try to provoke action by entering into Israeli waters and creating a situation in which the Israelis have the right to defend themselves,” Clinton told reporters on June 23. Of course, the foreboding language offers another blank check to Israel, giving it permission to do as it pleases. If Israel repeated the same scenario it used to intercept and punish activists abroad the first flotilla on May 31, 2010 – killing nine activists in the Mavi Marmara — then it would constitute another act of “self-defense,” according to Clinton’s avant-garde rationale.

            Responding to Clinton’s comments, Irish MEP Paul Murphy told the Irish Examiner on June 24: “It is not true that we will be entering Israeli waters. We will be sailing through Gaza waters.” He added, “Clinton’s comments are disgraceful. She has essentially given the green light to Israeli Defense Forces to use violence against participants in the flotilla.” Indeed, Israeli diplomats will be utilizing Clinton’s advanced verbal and political support for the Israeli action in every platform available to them.

            According to Clinton, the entire business with the flotillas is unnecessary. “We don’t think it’s useful or helpful or productive to the people of Gaza,” she told reporters in Washington, adding that, “a far better approach is to support the work that’s being done through the United Nations.”

            The United Nations had already declared the Gaza siege illegal. Various top UN officials have stated this fact repeatedly, and the international body had called on Israel to end the siege. Notable among the many statements was a 34-page report by UN human rights chief Navi Pillay. Published on Aug. 14, 2009, the report “accused Israel of violating the rules of warfare with its blockade stopping people and goods from moving in or out of the Gaza Strip,” according to the Associated Press. The Gaza blockade,” Pillay stated, “amounts to collective punishment of civilians, which is prohibited under the Geneva Conventions on the conduct of warfare and occupation.” Before the 34 pages could be thoroughly examined, both the US and Israel dismissed the findings. Now Clinton is suddenly urging all interested parties to work through the same institution that her department has repeatedly undermined.

            Pillay’s report was issued nearly two years ago. Since then, little has been done to remedy the situation and to bring to an end the protracted Palestinian tragedy in Gaza. In fact, UNRWA has recently put Gaza’s unemployment at 45.2 percent, allegedly amongst the worst in the world. The UN report, released on June 14, claimed that unemployment in the first half of 2011 had increased by 3 percent. Monthly wages were also shown to have declined significantly. It seems the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is not only bad, it is progressively worsening.

            This time, Clinton is speaking from a power position. As diplomatic pressure from Israel finally dissuaded Turkey from allowing the Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH) from joining the flotilla, it seems the Mavi Marmara won’t be setting sail to Gaza anytime soon. As if to confirm that the IHH decision was motivated by political pressure, Clinton “spoke to her Turkish counterpart, Ahmet Davutoglu to express her happiness at the announcement” (according to Turkey’s Hurriyet Daily News, June 21).

            With political victory in mind, the State Department travel warning of June 22 read like a legal disclaimer issued by the Israeli foreign ministry. It warned US citizens to avoid any attempt to reach Gaza by sea. Those who participate in a flotilla risk arrest, prosecution, deportation and a possible 10-year travel ban by Israel.

            In a region that is rife with opportunities for political stances — or at least a measurable shift in policy — the US State Department and its chief diplomat have offered nothing but inconsistency and contradiction. Now, thanks to a group of peaceful civil society activists, including many pacifists and elders, the State Department is getting its decisive voice back. And the voice is as atrocious and unprincipled as ever.

            — Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of PalestineChronicle.com.

  • Special Notes:

     

    [PDF]

    Use of the TermIndigenous” under the International System


    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
    The United Nations system started using the termindigenous people” rather than. “tribal people” as early as 1982. In that year, the Working Group on ...
    siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDPEOPLE/.../Legal%20Note.pdf
    Note:  The term was used by the WORLDBANK.
    ******************************************************
    FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY CARING SOCIETY OF CANADA

    Glossary

    This glossary is intended to assist with discussions about the past and present. Many terms have been ascribed to Indigenous peoples, cultures and society with little understanding. These terms may provide common understandings, but they cannot replace authentic dialogue about what is meaningful and representative of the many nations and communities that Indigenous peoples identify with.

    This glossary is not comprehensive and does not reflect the diversity of Indigenous communities around the world but it is intended as a place to begin.

    Aboriginal Nations The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) used this term in its final report. RCAP defines Aboriginal nations as a "sizable body of Aboriginal people with a shared sense of national identity that constitutes the predominant population in a certain territory or collection of territories." The term has gained acceptance among some Aboriginal groups.circle.gif
     
    Aboriginal peoples This is a collective name for all of the original peoples of Canada and their descendants. The Constitution Act of 1982 specifies that the Aboriginal Peoples in Canada consist of three groups - Indians, Inuit and Métis.

    First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples have unique heritages, languages, cultural practices and spiritual beliefs. The term Aboriginal peoples should not be used to describe only one or two of the groups. square.gif
     
    Aboriginal title A legal term that recognizes Aboriginal interest in the land. It is based on Aboriginal peoples' longstanding use and occupancy of the land as descendants of the original inhabitants of Canada. square.gif
     
    American "Indian" American "Indian" is a commonly-used term in the United States to describe the descendants of the original peoples of North America (see also Native Americans). Some people are dissatisfied with this term because it retains the misnomer "Indian" in its name and covers peoples who consider themselves distinct from "Indian" Peoples, namely the Inuit, Yupik and Aleut Peoples in Alaska. The term is not popular in Canada. circle.gif
     
    Band A band is an organizational structure defined in the Indian Act which represents a particular group of Indians as defined under the Indian Act. square.gif
     
    Band council This is the governing body for a band. It usually consists of a chief and councillors who are elected (under the Indian Act or band custom) for two or three-year terms to carry out band business, which may include education, water and sewer, fire services, community buildings, schools, roads, and other community businesses and services. square.gif
     
    Comprehensive claim Comprehensive claims are based on unextinguished aboriginal title. They arise where Aboriginal title has not been dealt with by treaty and other legal means. Comprehensive land claims negotiations address concerns raised by Aboriginal people, governments and third parties about who has the legal right to own or use the lands and resources in areas under claim. They include such things as land title, fishing and trapping rights and financial compensation. square.gif
     
    Eskimo Eskimo is the term once given to Inuit by European explorers and is now rarely used in Canada. It is derived from an Algonquin term meaning "raw meat eaters", and many people find the term offensive. The term is still frequently used in the United States in reference to Inuit in Alaska. circle.gif
     
    Extinguishment A term used to describe the cessation or surrender of aboriginal rights to lands and resources in exchange for rights granted in a treaty. square.gif
     
    Fiduciary duty The legal obligation of one party to act in the best interests of another. Canada has a fiduciary obligation with respect to Indians and lands reserved for Indians under Section 91(24) of the Constitution Act of 1867. square.gif
     
    First Nation(s) The term First Nations came into common use in the 1970s to replace Indian, which some people found offensive. Many communities have also replaced "band" with "First Nation" in their names.

    Despite its widespread use, there is no legal definition for this term in Canada. square.gif

     
    Indian The term Indian collectively describes all the Indigenous People in Canada who are not Inuit or Métis. Indian Peoples are one of three peoples recognized as Aboriginal in the Constitution Act, 1982 along with Inuit and Métis.

    Three categories apply to Indians in Canada: Status Indians, Non-Status Indians and Treaty Indians. square.gif

     
    Indian Act This is the Canadian federal legislation, first passed in 1876, which sets out certain federal government obligations, and regulates the management of Indian reserve lands. The act has been amended several times, most recently in 1985. square.gif
     
    Indian status An individual's legal status as an Indian, as defined by the Indian Act. square.gif
     
    Indigenous There is no official definition of Indigenous peoples. In part, the term "Indigenous" is described as follows: "Indigenous communities, peoples and nations are those which, having a historical continuity with pre-invasion and pre-colonial societies that developed on their territories, consider themselves distinct from other sectors of the societies now prevailing on those territories, or parts of them..."

    Its meaning is similar to Aboriginal Peoples, Native Peoples or First Peoples. It is often used to refer to Aboriginal people internationally. square.gif

     
    Inherent right The authority given to Aboriginal people by the Creator for self-determination, including the right to govern themselves. square.gif
     
    Innu Innu are the Naskapi and Montagnais First Nations Peoples who live in Quebec and Labrador. They are not to be confused with Inuit or Inuk. circle.gif
     
    Inuit Inuit are the Aboriginal People of Arctic Canada. Inuit live primarily in the Northwest Territories, Nunavut and northern parts of Quebec and throughout most of Labrador. They have traditionally lived north of the tree line in the areas bordered by the Mackenzie Delta in the west, the Labrador coast in the east, the southern point of Hudson Bay in the south, and the High Arctic islands in the north. The word Inuit means "the people" in Inuktitut and is the term by which Inuit refer to themselves. The Indian Act does not cover Inuit. However, in 1939, the Supreme Court of Canada interpreted the federal government's power to make laws affecting "Indians, and lands reserved for Indians" as extending to Inuit.

    Inuit live in communities and settlements. Inuit never lived on reserves, therefore the terms on-reserve or off-reserve do not apply to Inuit only to First Nations. There are four Inuit comprehensive land claims regions covering one-third of Canada: they are Unuvialuit, Nunavut, Nunavik and Labrador. Nunavut has three subregions-Kitikmeot, Kivalliq and Qikiqtaaluk. circle.gif

     
    Inuk Inuk is the singular form of Inuit. Use Inuk when referring to one person. When referring to two people the correct term is Inuuk while three or more is Inuit. square.gif
     
    Inuktitut Inuktitut is the Inuit language and writing system. Inuinnaqtun and Inuvialuit are also languages and writing systems for Western Arctic and Kitikmeot Region; Qaniuyaapiat for syllabics and Qaliuyaapait for Roman orthography or Inuinnaqtun. circle.gif
     
    Land claims In 1973, the federal government recognized two broad classes of claims - comprehensive and specific. square.gif
     
    Métis This is the French word for "mixed blood". The Constitution Act of 1982 recognizes Métis as one of the three Aboriginal Peoples. Historically, the term Métis applied to the children of French fur traders and Cree women in the Prairies, of English and Scottish traders, and Dene women in the north, and Inuit and British in Newfoundland and Labrador. Today, the term is used broadly to describe people with mixed First Nations and European ancestry who identify themselves as Métis. Note that Métis organizations in Canada have differing criteria about who qualifies as a Métis person. Métis Settlements: in 1938, the Alberta government set aside 1.25 million acres of land for eight Métis settlements, however, Métis never lived on reserves and the terms on/off reserve do not apply to them. circle.gif
     
    Native This commonly used term in the United States describes the descendants of the original peoples of North America.

    The term has not caught on in Canada because of the apparent reference to U.S. Citizenship. However, some Aboriginal Peoples in Canada have argued that because they are descendants of the original peoples of the Americas, the term Native American should apply to them regardless for their citizenship. Native North American has been used to identify the original peoples of Canada and the United States. circle.gif

     
    Non-Status Indians Non-Status Indians are people who consider themselves Indians or members of a First Nation but are not entitled to be registered under the Indian Act. This may be because their ancestors were never registered or because they lost their status under former provisions of the Indian Act. Non-Status Indians are not entitled to the same rights and benefits available to Status Indians. square.gif
     
    Reservation A reservation is land set aside by the U.S. government for the use and occupation of a group of Native Americans. The term does not apply in Canada. circle.gif
     
    Reserve The Indian Act describes a reserve as lands which have been set apart for the use and benefit of a Band, and for which the legal title rests with the Crown in right of Canada. The federal government has primary jurisdiction over these lands and the people living on them. square.gif
     
    Section 35 Section of the Constitution Act, 1982 that states that aboriginal rights and treaty rights are recognized and affirmed and makes it clear that treaty rights include rights that now exist by way of land claim agreements or that may be so acquired. As a result of this constitutional protection, government has an obligation not to infringe upon aboriginal and treaty rights without justification. square.gif
     
    Section 91(24) Section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, allocates jurisdiction to the Parliament of Canada to enact laws regarding "Indians and lands reserved for Indians." square.gif
     
    Self-government The internal regulation of a First Nation by its own people. square.gif
     
    Sovereignty Sovereignty is an internationally recognized concept. A basic tenet of sovereignty is the power of a people to govern themselves. triangle.gif
     
    Tribal Sovereignty American Indian tribal powers originate with the history of tribes managing their own affairs. Case law has established that tribes reserve the rights they had never given away.triangle.gif
     
    Specific claims Specific claims arise from the breach or non-fulfillment of government obligations found in treaties, agreements or statutes. square.gif
     
    Status Indians Status Indians are people who are entitled to have their names included on the Indian Register, an official list maintained by the federal government. Certain criteria determine who can be registered as a Status Indian. Only Status Indians are recognized as Indians under the Indian Act, which defines an Indian as "a person who, pursuant to this Act, is registered as an Indian or is entitled to be registered as an Indian." Status Indians are entitled to certain rights and benefits under the law. square.gif
     
    Treaty A negotiated agreement between a First Nation and the federal and provincial governments that spells out the rights of the First Nation with respect to lands and resources over a specified area. It may also define the self-government authority of a First Nation.

    The Government of Canada and the courts understand treaties between the Crown and Aboriginal people to be solemn agreements that set out promises, obligations and benefits for both parties. square.gif
     
    Treaty Indian Treaty Indians belong to a First Nations whose ancestors signed a treaty with the Crown and as a result are entitled to treaty benefits. square.gif
     
    Treaty right Treaty Rights are special rights to lands and entitlements that Indian people legally have as a result of treaties. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 recognizes and affirms, the "existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Aboriginal people of Canada." square.gif
     
    Tribal Council A tribal council is a group made up of several bands and represents the interests of those bands. A tribal council may administer funds or deliver common services to those bands. Membership in a tribal council tends to be organized around geographic, political, treaty, cultural, and/or linguistic lines. square.gif
     
    Tribe A tribe is a group of Native Americans sharing a common language and culture. The term is used frequently in the Unites States, but only in a few areas of Canada. square.gif

    Definitions sources and legend

    circle.gif National Aboriginal Health Organization
    square.gif Assembly of First Nations
    triangle.gif American Indian Policy Center

    Other terminology links:

    Indigenous Australia
    Agreements, Treaties and Negotiatied Settlements Project (Australia)

     

    ****************************************************************************

     
This reply was deleted.