FREE HAWAI`I TV - "NO THANKSA TO ANCSA" - Blog

Robin Danner is too young to have started the corporation, she may have worked for them, but not responsible for it's start. Yes, 1971 and those of us (not me, but my mom) in 1974 opposed to the 1971 situation in Alaska, but we/mom didn't have the resources to battle the Aloha Group. Which infact, had most adult Hawaiians involved at that time. The idea came from Alaska and the Queen's story... So my mom and other native Hawaiian women on DHHL hovered over the successorship of their homes... Now with the Akaka Bill, we are at this again, trying to protect the successorship.

The point... Alaskan Corporations forced/induced the loss of their successorship for land claims and they created an office for any native persons to come in and claim their property. But, from what I got from Jim Kaina only a few people went into claim their native tenant rights. All of this was happening from 1971 and until today. The technology that was used at that time was brand new to the academic community, it was GIS and it's outcome for data results. That's how come they were able to move so fast between the tribes.

Native Alaskain's, Eskimos, and Aleuts have to register with the federal government to hunt and so on...does this work no! I checked with several native people in Juno, Faibanks, and Anchorage including there homeless in their visitors park on many fronts.

I am taking responsibility for this problem because I was there not just in Alaska, but here in Hawaii and tried with all my might to talk down the Danner sisters intentions with our group since the day they arrived. But no one would listen, the state gave these girls CartBlanch (sp).

I wish I had the energy to demand from my Na Kupuna, all the reasons why they should have stopped these sisters from spewing their misguided leadership. I couldn't. Now it's clean up time and lots of damage control. Kaohi

You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!

Comments

Kaohi February 24, 2010 at 4:23pm

Robin Danner is too young to have started the corporation, she may have worked for them, but not responsible for it's start. Yes, 1971 and those of us (not me, but my mom) in 1974 opposed to the 1971 situation in Alaska, but we/mom didn't have the resources to battle the Aloha Group. Which infact, had most adult Hawaiians involved at that time. The idea came from Alaska and the Queen's story... So my mom and other native Hawaiian women on DHHL hovered over the successorship of their homes... Now with the Akaka Bill, we are at this again, trying to protect the successorship.

The point... Alaskan Corporations forced/induced the loss of their successorship for land claims and they created an office for any native persons to come in and claim their property. But, from what I got from Jim Kaina only a few people went into claim their native tenant rights. All of this was happening from 1971 and until today. The technology that was used at that time was brand new to the academic community, it was GIS and it's outcome for data results. That's how come they were able to move so fast between the tribes.

Native Alaskain's, Eskimos, and Aleuts have to register with the federal government to hunt and so on...does this work no! I checked with several native people in Juno, Faibanks, and Anchorage including there homeless in their visitors park on many fronts.

I am taking responsibility for this problem because I was there not just in Alaska, but here in Hawaii and tried with all my might to talk down the Danner sisters intentions with our group since the day they arrived. But no one would listen, the state gave these girls CartBlanch (sp).

I wish I had the energy to demand from my Na Kupuna, all the reasons why they should have stopped these sisters from spewing their misguided leadership. I couldn't. Now it's clean up time and lots of damage control. Kaohi

This reply was deleted.