Racist US judge rules the state of Hawaii can commit genocide against the Hawaiian people









SERVICES, et al.,




CIV. NO. 11-00702 JMS/RLP




On November 18, 2011, Plaintiff Alfred Napahuelua Spinney, as

“Kanaka-Hawaiian subject and Prime Minister for the government of the Kingdom

of the Hawaiian Islands,” (“Plaintiff”) filed a “Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for

a Petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus” seeking the release of three minor children

from the State of Hawaii, Catholic Charities Hawaii, and various individuals

(“Defendants”). Plaintiff asserts that these three minors were unlawfully removed

under the pretense that they needed protection from their father, David Kaawa IV.

Plaintiff asserts that Defendants are “engaging in a conspiracy to alienate the []

Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 19


children from their father, their family, the country of their birth, their culture and

their ethnicity,” which constitutes “GENOCIDE against the Hawaiian people

. . . .”

Although titled as a Writ of Habeas Corpus, neither Plaintiff nor any

of the minor children he seeks release of are “in custody” such that 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 does not apply. See Cucalon v. Rice, 317 Fed. Appx. 602, 603 (9th Cir.

2008) (“We lack habeas corpus jurisdiction because [the mother] and her children

are not ‘in custody’ as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2241.”). In any event, upon sua

sponte review, the court DISMISSES the Complaint without leave to amend.


Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court liberally construes his

pleadings. See Eldridge v. Block, 832 F.2d 1132, 1137 (9th Cir. 1987) (“The

Supreme Court has instructed the federal courts to liberally construe the ‘inartful

pleading’ of pro se litigants.”) (citing Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365

(1982) (per curiam)). The court also recognizes that “[u]nless it is absolutely clear

that no amendment can cure the defect . . . a pro se litigant is entitled to notice of

the complaint’s deficiencies and an opportunity to amend prior to dismissal of the

action.” Lucas v. Dep’t of Corr., 66 F.3d 245, 248 (9th Cir. 1995).

Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 20


Nevertheless, the court may dismiss a complaint pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on its own motion. See Omar v. Sea-Land Serv.,

Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987) (“A trial court may dismiss a claim sua

sponte under [Rule] 12(b)(6). Such a dismissal may be made without notice where

the claimant cannot possibly win relief.”); Ricotta v. California, 4 F. Supp. 2d 961,

968 n.7 (S.D. Cal. 1998) (“The Court can dismiss a claim sua sponte for a

Defendant who has not filed a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).”).

Additionally, a complaint that is “obviously frivolous” does not confer federal

subject matter jurisdiction and may be dismissed sua sponte. Franklin v. Murphy,

745 F.2d 1221, 1227 n.6 (9th Cir. 1984); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); Grupo

Dataflux v. Atlas Global Grp., L.P., 541 U.S. 567, 593 (2004) (“[I]t is the

obligation of both district court and counsel to be alert to jurisdictional


“To survive a motion to dismiss [pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)], a

complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim

to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949

(2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)); see

also Weber v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 521 F.3d 1061, 1065 (9th Cir. 2008). This

tenet -- that the court must accept as true all of the allegations contained in the

Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 21


complaint -- “is inapplicable to legal conclusions.” Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. at 1949.

Accordingly, “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported

by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id. (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at

555). Rather, “[a] claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual

content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is

liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. at 1949 (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556).

Factual allegations that only permit the court to infer “the mere possibility of

misconduct” do not show that the pleader is entitled to relief as required by Rule 8.

Id. at 1950.

The court may also dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to

comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Rule 8 mandates that a complaint

include a “short and plain statement of the claim,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and that

“each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1). A

complaint that is so confusing that its “‘true substance, if any, is well disguised’”

does not satisfy Rule 8. Hearns v. San Bernardino Police Dep’t, 530 F.3d 1124,

1131 (9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Gillibeau v. City of Richmond, 417 F.2d 426, 431

(9th Cir. 1969)); see also McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 1996)

(“Something labeled a complaint but written . . . prolix in evidentiary detail, yet

Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 22


without simplicity, conciseness and clarity as to whom plaintiffs are suing for what

wrongs, fails to perform the essential functions of a complaint.”).

Put differently, a district court may dismiss a complaint for failure to

comply with Rule 8 where the complaint fails to provide defendants with fair

notice of the wrongs they have allegedly committed. See McHenry, 84 F.3d at

1178-80 (affirming dismissal of complaint where “one cannot determine from the

complaint who is being sued, for what relief, and on what theory, with enough

detail to guide discovery”); cf. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hosp. Med. Ctr., 521 F.3d

1097, 1105 n.4 (9th Cir. 2008) (finding dismissal under Rule 8 was in error where

“the complaint provide[d] fair notice of the wrongs allegedly committed by

defendants and [did] not qualify as overly verbose, confusing, or rambling”). Rule

8 requires more than “the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation[s]” and “[a]

pleading that offers labels and conclusions or a formulaic recitation of the elements

of a cause of action will not do.” Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. at 1949 (citations and

quotations omitted). “The propriety of dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 8

does not depend on whether the complaint is wholly without merit.” McHenry, 84

F.3d at 1179.



Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 23



Plaintiff, as Prime Minister of the “Kingdom of Hawaii,” seeks release

of three minor children that were apparently taken from the custody of their father

and are allegedly being detained unlawfully by Defendants. Plaintiff asserts that

these children are citizens of the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands, and that their

removal constitutes genocide as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 1091(6).

First, the court rejects out of hand Plaintiff’s assertions suggesting that

the “Kingdom of Hawaii” is a separate legal entity from the United State, and that

the State of Hawaii commits “genocide” by taking children into protective services.

There is no legally cognizable Kingdom of Hawaii; the State of Hawaii is a part of

the United States; and Hawaii state custody of children is not “genocide.”

Second, this court appears to lack jurisdiction over the Complaint --

both Plaintiff and Defendants appear to be citizens of the State of Hawaii and no

federal question appears to be presented.

Third, even if Plaintiff presents a Constitutional claim, it fails. After

stripping away the nonsensical allegations from the Complaint, the court is left

with the basic allegations that Defendants took three minor children into custody in

violation of David Kaawa IV’s parental rights. Although Plaintiff did not provide

any details regarding precisely how David Kaawa IV’s parental rights were

Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 24


allegedly violated (or why Plaintiff has standing to object to any violation of

Kaawa’s rights), the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over such

issues -- the court may not issue child custody decrees, see Ankenbrandt v.

Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 703 (1992) (holding that the domestic relations exception

to federal subject matter jurisdiction “divests the federal courts of power to issue

divorce, alimony and child custody decrees”); nor may it may review state court

child custody proceedings. See Hanson v. Firmat, 272 Fed. Appx. 571, 572 (9th

Cir. 2008) (affirming dismissal of claims asserting due process violations in child

custody proceedings due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the Rooker-

Feldman doctrine); Watkins v. Proulx, 235 Fed. Appx. 678, 679 (9th Cir. 2007)

(“The district court properly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction

pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine because Watkins’ action amounted to a

de facto appeal of a state court child custody order.” (citing Exxon Mobil Corp. v.

Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005) (Rooker-Feldman bars

“state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments

rendered before the district court proceedings commenced” from asking district

courts to review and reject those judgments.)).

The court therefore DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint. Because any

amendment would be futile, this dismissal is without leave to amend.

Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 25



For the reasons stated above, the court DISMISSES the Complaint.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case file.


DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 28, 2011.

/_s_/ _J_. _M_i_c_h_a_e_l _S_e_a_b_ri_g_h_t__________

J. Michael Seabright

United States District Judge

Spinney v. State of Hawaii et al., Civ. No. 11-00702 JMS/RLP; Order Dismissing Complaint

Case 1:11-cv-00702-JMS-RLP Document 4 Filed 11/28/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 26

Views: 712

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Kanaka Maoli Patriot

Since he was 19 years old, Pomai has been

"lobbying the Legislature" !

They cut down the royal palms around

the Kamehameha statue !

Court Dates:

Pomai is going to Court !

The Trials dates are:

1. July 13 at 1:30 PM Room 10C

---Pomai did not show by accident !

2. July 14 at 1:30 PM Room 3A


3. Tuesday August 11

-- Dwight will be coming from Kaua'i

The Judge: "Mr. Kinney, how do you plead ??






The Judge: "Very Well." (aside)

"Sweet Jesus, help me ! I think I'm feeling

fot- less !"

Pomai: "Now, to avoid any collision of arrest

from agents of the United States, and perhaps

the loss of my life and freedom, I seek the

full independence of the Hawaiian Islands

as a Independent Nation of the Free World."

"The United States needs to Pull Down their

flag and get out of my country, the Hawaiian

Kingdom. Stop the Military Build Up in my

country. Every day Americans allow their

constitution to be violated.


In Honolulu the Patriots Rally

"After renouncing my citizenship to the

United States on January 17, 1993, I have

gone home to my country, my nation, my

Hawai'i, the Hawaiian Kingdom. My loyalty

as a Hawaiian Kingdom national is to the

Hawaiian Kingdom."

"I can see through your mind.

I can see through your brain

like I see through the water that runs down my drain."

Our Queen Lili'uokalani

On March 31, 2009 the U.S. Supreme Court took back

the Apology to the Hawaiian People and got the United

Church of Christ completely off the hook for any

"reconciliation" whatsoever !

"They speak with forked tongue." -- Pomai

Total and Complete INDEPENDENCE !!

"Many of the tourists of the Kingdom have asked

me about the Akaka Bill because it is in the U.S.A.

news. "

Kill the Akaka Bill Before It Kills Us !



"These kanakas, like Dwight de Armas, sure

know how to head for the hills when the

chips are down. Why am I always alone

in Court ??"

  1. Uncle Richard Pomai Kinney - Maoliworld

    9 posts - 5 authors - Last post: Oct 22
    So saddened to hear of the passing of my uncle Richard... You will be deeply missed uncle. Me and Kapono boy will miss u until we meet again ...
  2. I will miss you Pomai Kinney - Maoliworld

    Oct 20, 2011 – Pomai Kinney would show up at protests with his flag in distress. I protested with him at 'Iolani Palace when Dictator Neil Abercrummy took his ...
  3. KU'E 11-24-08 Pomai Kinney.m4v - YouTube

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhpAiR-Vk5sNov 25, 2008 - 3 min - Uploaded by ponosize
    Kupu'āina Coalition A Rally Demanding that Governor Lingle RESPECT NATIVE HAWAIIAN RIGHTS and ...
  4. Pomai Kinney | Facebook

    Join Facebook to connect with Pomai Kinney and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and connected.
  5. Pomai Kinney (@Pomaikaiokalani) on Twitter

    Sign up for Twitter to follow Pomai Kinney (@Pomaikaiokalani).
  6. Richard Pomai Kinney

    BLNZ is an independent distributor of news, talk, and entertainment content.
  7. Pomai-kinney | The Honolulu 10 - Directory of Restaurants ...

    16, 17 and 19 From: The Committee of Hawaiian Nationals (Pilipo Souza, Pomai Kinney, Kahumoku Flores…) Contact: Pilipo Souza at 358-6428 Aloha kakou, ...
  8. News From Indian Country - Hawaii celebrates 50 years after ...

    Longtime protester Richard Pomai Kinney carried his Hawaii state flag upside-down as a sign of distress. “Statehood is a fraud,” said Kinney, ...
  9. Sunday, May 24, 2009 - Free Hawai`i

    May 24, 2009 – Speaking of patriots, we have a brand new Voices Of Truth show this week with Pomai Kinney, who lives as a Hawai`i National with every ...


Repost of Message from Eric

50 Percenters "fxcking idiots and are the paramount enemy to the Hawaiian Independence struggle..."

From: poohina
To: hawaiianhistory@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: Re: "Joe Jap" Inouye, et. als. - commentary from Pilipo, etc.
Hawaiian homesteaders signed off all of their land claims to the U.S. government
when they signed the Homestead lease agreement.
stipulated in their leese the homesteaders gave up all of their rights to the
land claims and the water and the sacred sites.
They are fucking idiots and are the paramount enemy to the Hawaiian independence
struggle and they know nothing about their genealogy and their cosmogony the
Kumulipo. They are the ones that the joe jap democratic party are using to further
suppress us.
Give me your address so I can send you a hard copy of the lease so
you can scan it and get the message out wikiwiki!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
forward this message out to your email network list!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


KU'E 11-24-08 Pomai Kinney.m4v

youtube.comNov 25, 2008 - 3 min - Uploaded by ponosize
Kupu'āina Coalition A Rally Demanding that Governor Lingle RESPECT NATIVE HAWAIIAN RIGHTS and ...

To Restore Our Kingdom - A Visit With ...

youtube.comMay 19, 2009 - 28 min - Uploaded by voicesoftruth
VoicesOfTruthTV.com - His country never went away no matter what the history books say. That's why you'd ...

Reminder to Family(ies)/Friends only................

Pomai's Services will be held at the Iolani Palace on December 15, 2011

Remembering what you said.....documented you as a terrorist.........Remembering Pomai............

Long Live The Hawaiian Kingdom, o Pomaiokalani, Hawaiian Kingdom National Royalist 1993

enjoy this pic of the one you hated..........you documented terrorist...........Pomai told me about you.....

Remembering him, a true fighter.......

Long Live The Hawaiian Kingdom, o Pomaiokalani, Hawaiian Kingdom National Royalist 1993

amelia gora is a a'ama crab syndrome system mind mentality..scary...she goes off ..with no understanding

that is why oahu people is confused and off based.....need to address and end this kind of crab system

not good for our next future generations that is coming...especially on our Kingdom of Maui Nui.......please learn from this individual.....i am so glad she (amelia gora) is from oahu...please oahu leaders keep her there...thank you

i can imagine...honolulu police dept...and poor thing (hawaii ko pae aina).....and i can just imagine her ohana nation??????...... personally dealing with this lady (amelia gora)....she just one pure harassment case.....she is an human accident...waiting to happen?????..very careless~~~in her uniting her royalships, hummm????

i hope this is all recorded and documented for evidence later...just in case we may need it in our near future....smiles...da princess of Loko O Mokuhinia...da Royal Capital of our Hawaiian Kingdom Government~~~ 

copy fast............removing good posts NOW!

you know everything so you don't need NOTHING!

Remembering what you said...........documented....

Long Live The Hawaiian Kingdom, o Pomaiokalani, Hawaiian Kingdom National Royalist 1993

Terrorist Aquino documented again..........

Message sent to hpd/Honolulu Police Department, et. als. few seconds ago, 12/9/2011:

Re: Valerie Aquino - for the records:  documenting reminder about a genocide activist and terrorist - genocide activities file from Amelia Gora ---Happy Holidays....


© 2019   Created by Ikaika Hussey.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service