A comparative writing to see how in the world did we go wrong along the pathway of being Na Kanaka.
Introduction with out a thesis or contention--just a whole lot of happenings.
I contacted Paul Spruhan and he referred me back to his site to obtain his dissertation. As I am reading his work, lights are popping in my head as to why things are so wrong. He gives me a background to do the battles in the ideal world of bloodquantum sorts. First the bloodquantum started in the 1920s with Prince Kuhio at the helm. However, the populace (native Hawaiians) sent in their objection to the 1/32 which was suggested or proposed by John Wise. The populace objected to John Wise at that time because of his quantitative notion of 1/32. For those of you who are led to believe it was congress that quantified the native Hawaiians need to take a walk to the library. That also tells me that the University of Hawaii at Manoa and Prince Kuhio were the origin of the quantitative measurements of defining native Hawaiians. The second point is the populaces that are the ‘first people’ that requested the unquantitative measurement which is that both partners should be Na Kanaka-Hawaiian. UH Manoa being the power base for all things decided that was too sustainable, thus, is the major problem with people that need power over people. Academic community looses their humanity to scholarships and its wretched studies even to the point of committing malice or genocide in academic work. So often, we the first people have to throw these dogs some bones to chew on. My third point, and one that is most important to me, is the fact that our Na Kane did not want to sleep with their own cousins; therefore, it was the women’s burden to bare the babies on state land. Moreover, the territory made sure that the lease was made to a Kane, and not the wife (or females). Early on there was only one name on the lease which gave the males a dominant status over the female, the pretense that native Hawaiians are male-male. It took my family to change all that in the 80s to where as a female could become a leaser. That opened the flood gates for native Hawaiians and their sustainable living. It took sixty years for this basic humanity to happen. UH Manoa academic community and their unsustainable applied studies went berserk. I know because I was living at UH Manoa side stepping this action and trying to survive the burning fires in several departments at UH Manoa and that includes the Na Kanaka on the Board of Regents. To put things into perspective, although first people wanted both partners to be native Hawaiian for a lease in part on the 200,000 approximate acres, they all settled for 50% plus bloodquantum. This male-male agreement in 1923 was practical but not sustainable.
The descendants of the first people wanted a change for sustainable reasons, and that was to utilize the incomes and proceeds of the States 5(f) ceded lands, at first it was a simple request of small monies for a children’s summer program. They the women of the first people living on Department of Hawaiian Homes lands in 1974 asked the dominant political group for assistants in this matter. Incorporations were formed with both the political dominant group Council of Hawaiian Organization (COHO) and women from DHHL. Big mistake!
Shifting in the wind, the first people filed a complaint with the Civil Rights Commission and the outcome of that contention was that the State of Hawaii was in Breach of Trust. The ‘Broken Trust’ smashed that report to a million pieces. The 1978 Constitutional Convention decided to do away with the bloodquantum and Rice v Cayetano was birthed and two headed monster with its heads stuck together. In the early 1990s rather than evict family members from DHHL, we went back to congress and made an amendment to the Organic Act and its Hawaiian Homestead Act that would allow the successor to be of quarter bloodquantum.
Here comes the Na Kanaka Carnivorous that is native Hawaiian wannabees male-male that preyed their entire lives on native Hawaiian women and their children and it was no longer about power and violence, it was about their back pockets and their sickly needy homecare. These U.S warriors decided to come home and make like they the hero and like put their heads down in a native Hawaiian community. They don’t want to wait for Punchbowl and its 21 gun salute.
Replies
"You can't spend what you ain't got; you can't lose what you ain't never had." – Muddy Waters
"How long do we have to stay in Bosnia, how long do we have to stay in South Korea, how long are we going to stay in Japan, how long are we going to stay in Germany? All of those: 50, 60 year period. No one complains." –Sen. John McCain
Imagine if you grew up being told that you had been adopted, only to learn that you were, in fact, kidnapped. That might spur you to start searching for the adoption papers. Now imagine that you could find no papers and no one could produce any.
That's how Dr. David Keanu Sai, a retired Army Captain with a PhD in political science and instructor at Kapiolani Community College in Hawaii, characterizes Hawaii's international legal status. Since 1993, Sai has been researching the history of the Kingdom of Hawaii and its complicated relationship to the United States.
Over the last 17 years, Sai has lectured and testified publicly in Hawaii, New Zealand, Canada, across the US, at the United Nations and at thePermanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague on Hawaiian land issues on Hawaii's international status and how Hawaii came to be regarded as a US territory and, eventually, the 50th state.
To explain why he and others insist that Hawaii is not now and never has been lawfully part of the United States, Sai presents an overview of Hawaii's feudal land system and its history as an independent, sovereign kingdom prior to the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani on January 16, 1893.
Sai likens his lectures to a scene in the film The Matrix in which the character Morpheus tells Neo, "Remember, all I'm offering is the truth. Nothing more."
"You guys are going to swallow the little red pill and will find that what you thought you knew may not be what actually was," Sai warns his audiences. Like The Matrix, which is an assumption of a false reality, Hawaii's history needs to be reexamined through a legal framework, he says. "What I've done is step aside from politics and power and look at Hawaii not through an ethnic or cultural lens, but through the rule of law."
"A lot of sovereignty groups assume they don't have it. Sovereignty never left. We just don't have a government." – Dr. David Keanu Sai
Sai's lectures review history from 1842, when the Hawaiian Kingdom under King Kamehameha III sent envoys to France, Great Britain and the United States to secure recognition of Hawaii's sovereignty. US President John Tyler recognized Hawaiian independence on December 19, 1842, with France and Great Britain following in November of 1843. November 28 became recognized as La Kuokoa (Independence Day).
Over the next 44 years, Hawaiian independence was recognized by more than a dozen countries across Europe, Asia and the Pacific, with each establishing foreign embassies and consulates in Hawaii. By 1893, the Kingdom of Hawaii had opened 90 embassies and consulates around the world, including Washington, DC, with consul generals in San Francisco and New York. The United States opened its own embassy in Hawaii after entering into a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation on December 20, 1849.
In 1854, in response to concerns about naval battles potentially being fought in the Pacific region during the Crimean war, King Kamehameha III declared Hawaii to be a neutral state, a "Switzerland of the Pacific."
As recently as 2005, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals acknowledged that in 1866, "the Hawaiian Islands were still a sovereign kingdom"; prior to that, in 2004, the Court referred to Hawaii as a "co-equal sovereign alongside the United States." Likewise, in 2001, the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague acknowledged in an arbitration award that "in the 19th century the Hawaiian Kingdom existed as an independent State recognized as such by the United States of America, the United Kingdom and various other States … ."
Hawaii's fate changed forever on January 16, 1893 when, motivated by influential naval officer Alfred Thayer Mahan and the US Ambassador to Hawaii - with support from an expansionist US Congress wishing to extend its military presence into the Pacific - US troops landed on Oahu in violation of Hawaiian sovereignty and over the protest of both the Governor of Oahu and the Kingdom of Hawaii's Minister of Foreign Affairs.
One day later, six ethnic European Hawaiian subjects, including Sanford Dole and seven foreign businessmen, under the name the "Citizen's Committee of Public Safety," with the protection of the US military, formally declared themselves to be the new provisional government of the Hawaiian Islands - effectively a bloodless coup.
This marriage of convenience between non-ethnic Hawaiian subjects who wished to operate their sugar cane businesses tariff-free in the American market and a US government and military seeking to advance its own position in the Pacific conspired to overthrow the government of a sovereign foreign nation, Sai tells his audiences.
One month later, members of a group claiming to be the new provisional government of Hawaii traveled to Washington, where they signed a "treaty of cession" which went from President Benjamin Harrison to the US Senate. Queen Liliuokalani's protests to Harrison were ignored.
When the new US president Grover Cleveland assumed power, he was promptly presented with the Queen's protest demanding an investigation of their diplomat and US troops, as well as of the coup. Cleveland, after withdrawing the treaty before it could be ratified by the Senate, initiated an investigation called the Blount Report. The investigation found that both the US military and the US Ambassador to Hawaii had violated international law and that the US was obliged to restore the government of the Hawaiian Kingdom to its pre-overthrow status.
In November of 1893, President Cleveland negotiated an agreement to fully restore the government of Queen Liliuokalani under the condition she grant amnesty to all involved in her overthrow. A formal declaration accepting Cleveland's terms of restoration came from the queen in December 1893.
This executive agreement between President Grover Cleveland and Queen Liliuokalani, Sai says, is binding under both international and US federal law and precludes any other legal actions under the doctrine of estoppel. Yet the US Congress obstructed President Cleveland's efforts to fulfill his agreement with the queen, just as a self-proclaimed provisional government named itself the "Republic of Hawaii."
By the spring of 1897 Cleveland had left office, succeeded by President William McKinley. Soon after, representatives of the "Republic of Hawaii" attempted to fully cede all public, government and crown lands to the United States, even as Liliuokalani continued protesting to the US State Department.
In support of the queen and fighting attempts to cede Hawaii, some 38,000 Hawaiian subjects signed petitions against annexation, and by March of 1898, a second attempt to annex Hawaii failed.
Here things accelerate, Sai explains. With the outbreak of war with Spain in April 1898, the drive to expand US naval power into the Pacific to counter Spanish influence in the Philippines and Guam reached a new urgency.
Two weeks after declaring war on Spain, US Rep. Francis Newlands (D-Nevada) submitted a resolution calling for the annexation of Hawaii by the United States. Influential military figures like Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan and General John Schofield testified that the possession of Hawaii by the United States was of "paramount importance." It was in this atmosphere that the Newlands Resolution moved from the House to the Senate and became a joint resolution which President McKinley signed, claiming to have successfully annexed the Hawaiian Islands.
On August 12, 1898, the Hawaiian flag was lowered, the American flag raised, and the Territory of Hawaii formally declared.
But Sai points out that a Congressional joint resolution is American legislation restricted to the boundaries of the United States. The key to Hawaii's legal status, he says, remains with the 1893 executive agreement between two heads of state: President Grover Cleveland and Queen Liliuokalani.
Unlike other land acquisitions made by cession and voluntary treaties with the French, Spanish, British, Russia and the 1848 Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty that ended the Mexican-American war, Sai notes there is no treaty of cession, and thus no ceded lands, by then-acting head of state Queen Liliuokalani.
Today, one hundred and seventeen years after US Marines landed on Oahu and helped coup leaders overthrow the Hawaiian Kingdom, what Sai calls "the myth of Hawaiian statehood" is perpetuated, indeed celebrated, on the third Friday of each August, as Statehood Day.
"America today can no more annex Iraq through a joint resolution than it could acquire Hawaii by joint resolution in 1898. Saddam Hussein's government, the Baathist party … was annihilated by the United States. But by overthrowing the government, that did not also mean Iraq was overthrown as a sovereign state. Iraq still existed, but it did not have a government," says Sai.
Truthout needs your help to sustain groundbreaking, independent jou...
In his doctoral dissertation, Sai successfully argued that to date, under international laws, Hawaii is in fact not a legal territory of the Unites States, but instead a sovereign kingdom, albeit one lacking its own acting government.
The entity that overthrows a government, Sai says, bears the responsibility to administer the laws of the occupied state.
Sai says that despite what people have been led to believe, the Congressional joint resolution and US failed attempts to annex Hawaii are American laws limited to American territory. He stresses that the executive agreement of 1893 between President Cleveland and Hawaii's Queen continues to take precedence over any other subsequent actions.
Sai says this all has the potential to completely alter any claims on public or private land ownership, all State of Hawaii government bodies and the presence and activities of the US military in Hawaii, specifically the US Pacific Command (PACOM), the preeminent military authority overseeing operations in the Pacific, Oceania and East Asia.
Among the potential impacts of Sai's argument is the possibility that the United States' oldest and arguably most important strategic power center (PACOM's headquarters are at Camp Smith, near Pearl Harbor) is now facing a legal challenge and occupies territory of questionable legal status.
Sai has presented this information not only in arbitration proceedings at the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the World Court at the Hague and in a complaint filed with the UN Security Council, but in 2001, at the invitation of Lieutenant General James Dubik, before the officer's corps of the 25th Infantry Division at Schoefield Barracks on Oahu.
After Sai's presentation before some one hundred officers and their spouses, he says, "You could hear a pin drop. They knew what I was talking about — I didn't have to say 'war crimes.'" Sai cited the regulations on the occupation of neutral countries in Hague Convention No. 6.
University of Hawaii Press, which reviewed and approved Sai's dissertation for publication, indicates Sai's arguments have "profound legal ramifications." Sai himself says the case calls into question the legal authority of Senator Daniel Inouye, President Obama and others. After all, both Daniel Inouye and Barack Obama were born in Hawaii which, Sai points out, is not a legal US territory.
On June 1, 2010, Sai advanced his case and filed a lawsuit with the US District Court for the District of Columbia naming Barack H. Obama, Hillary D. R. Clinton, Robert M. Gates, (now former) Governor Linda Lingle and Admiral Robert F. Willard of the US Pacific Command as defendants.
Sai cites the Liliuokalani assignment of executive power as a binding legal agreement which extends from President Cleveland to all successors, including President Obama and his administration, to administer Hawaiian Kingdom law prior to restoring the government.
In the suit, Sai seeks a judgment by the court to declare the 1898 Joint Resolution to provide for annexing the Hawaiian Islands to the United States to be in violation of Hawaiian sovereignty and unconstitutional under US law.
In November, Sai sought to add to the suit as defendants the ambassadors of 35 countries which he says unlawfully maintain consulates in Hawaii in violation of Hawaiian Kingdom law and treaties. These countries include China, India, Russia, Brazil, Australia, Japan and smaller nations like Kiribati, Palau and the tiny enclave of San Marino.
With such a bold case that challenges the very top tier of the United States government and military, it isn't surprising that not everyone supports Sai's approach. Some Hawaiian activists privately say Sai's efforts have the potential to adversely impact other forms of federal recognition such as the Akaka Bill, while others express concerns that such a lawsuit could be at best ineffective and, at worst, result in bad laws.
"In the creation of a society, it's not only historical justification upon which we need to build Hawaiian sovereignty. We need to bring about better quality of life after independence returns."
– Poka Laenui
Poka Laenui, chairman of the Native Hawaiian Convention, an international delegation of Hawaiians which examines the issues of Hawaiian sovereignty and self-governance, says he does not dispute Sai's historical claims, nor does he disagree that the US occupies the Hawaiian Islands in violation of international law. He says Sai has made a "very positive contribution."
He does, however, suggest that Sai's efforts toward deoccupation could go further or be more inclusive. "I believe what should also be included is decolonization. Along with [Sai's] analysis, there are many more approaches that are legitimate."
"Decolonization is a very viable position as well. I'm saying occupation and colonization are on the same spectrum, but colonization goes far deeper. It affects economics, education and value systems like we have in Hawaii today."
"Hawaii has been squarely named as a country that needs to be decolonized and the US has not followed the appropriate, very clear procedures already set out." Laenui points out that the United States listed Hawaii as a territory to be decolonized in 1946 in the UN General Assembly Resolution 66 (1).
"We need not only to look at the historical, legal approach, but beyond that … we need to change the deep culture of Hawaii to build a better quality of life," Laenui says.
Lynette Hiilani Cruz is president of the Ka Lei Maile Alii Hawaiian Civic Club and an assistant professor of anthropology at Hawaii Pacific University. She supports Sai's efforts and says he provides a "dependable legal basis" for challenging the legality of US claims on Hawaii.
But she also points out there are native Hawaiians who, in spite of the history, are reluctant to associate themselves with the kind of legal challenge Sai is pursuing.
And while some would rather forget historical events, Cruz says, "It is our history, whether you like it or not." Cruz suggests people visit Sai's website a href="http://hawaiiankingdom.org/" target="_blank">hawaiiankingdom.org> and study the original historical documents in order to better understand the basis for Sai's legal claims.
Dr. Kawika Liu, an inactive attorney with a PhD in politics and a practicing physician, says, "I support many canoes going to the same destination. I'm just a little leery of potentially ending up in a Supreme Court that is extremely hostile to indigenous claims. From my perspective, having litigated a number of native Hawaiian rights cases, I am not sure Sai will make it past procedural matters."
Liu believes Sai's characterization of historical and political events is accurate, but says, "You can be very correct in the way you characterize history and still be shot down because of issues of jurisdiction."
"We're operating in the courts of the colonizer … and they have their own agenda, which is, to me, reinforcing US hegemony."
Liu sees the greatest benefit of Sai's work as raising awareness of the issue. "I think the more awareness that's raised - eventually the change is going to come."
One academic who thinks Sai is on the right track is Dr. Jon Kamakawiwoole Osorio, professor of Hawaiian studies at the University of Hawaii. Osorio specializes in the politics of identity in the Hawaiian Kingdom and the colonization of the Pacific and served on Sai's dissertation committee.
He says Sai knows international law and the laws of occupation as they pertain to Hawaii as well as any academic in Hawaii today.
Yet he recognizes Sai has detractors - those who feel that any kind of interpretation which exalts Western law does a disservice to native people and institutions which thrived without those laws for millennia. Osorio also says that while arguing that Hawaii has a solid international case sounds really good, it doesn't go very far if the US government simply refuses to acknowledge that case or respond in any way.
So does Osorio think Sai's efforts are counterproductive or a waste of time?
"I don't think that's the case," Osorio says. "I think most people believe Keanu Sai has really added a tremendous new perspective of the kingdom, lawmaking and the creation of constitutional law in Hawaii."
He also believes Sai's argument that sovereignty, once conferred, doesn't disappear just because it is occupied by another country.
What Sai may be pursuing, Osorio suggests, is to push for a definitive stance by the US government which may take the form of a denial that Hawaiians can claim sovereignty.
"I think Sai's attempt to push the US, to corner it and force it to acknowledge that it holds Hawaii only by raw power … is an important revelation that would have really important political ramifications."
"Sai says our sovereignty is still intact. That has been a tremendous gift for the Hawaiian movement because it keeps many of us pursuing independence from the United States instead of simply settling for some other kind of status (such as the Akaka Bill) because we feel like we aren't legally entitled to it," Osorio says.
"The violence done against the Hawaiian kingdom at the end of the [19th] century was no less violent just because not a lot of people were killed," Osorio says. "It violated our laws, it violated our trust, it violated the relationship between our people and our rulers and it continues to this day to stand between any kind of friendly relations between Hawaiians who know this history and the United States.
"Sai's analysis helped many of us to understand more completely that we don't have to think of ourselves as Americans — ever."
hi Kaohi,
entre vous sil vous plait.............the fact that PREMEDITATION occurred and is documented....changes the whole picture...........
conspiracy(ies) are documented..........the Queen was under DURESS which means all is null and void.....
the Hawaiian Kingdom went underground and is back again...........
we just need to have the U.S. (along with England/Great Britain and the Morgan bankers which includes the international bankers ---Bank of England etc.) documented as a genocide nation for the records and for the whole World to see............
WHAT IS IS
Quantum language used............legalese which saved Bill Clinton from being booted from the White House.
see: David Wyn Miller (President William Clinton's teacher) site and Mahealani Ventura Oliver's website for some of the information and go to the website to learn more about Quantum language, etc.
http://dwmlc.com/
Terms
English
Structure
Dictionary
Thesaurus
Mueller:
BOOK-ORDER
Becraf
:SEMINARS
:MEDIA
:FLAGS
~1 FOR THIS PLENIPOTENTIARY-JUDGE: David-Wynn: Miller's-KNOWLEDGE OFTHESE
CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURES-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE=(C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.)
IS WITH THE CLAIMS BY THE
QUANTUM-LANGUAGE-SYNTAX-NOW-TIME-WRITTEN-COMMUNICATION-FACTS.
~2 FOR THE EDUCATIONAL-CORRECTIONS OF THESE MODIFYING-COMMUNICATIONS AREWITH THESE CORRECTION-CLAIMS AGAINST THESE FICTIONAL-ADVERB-VERB-USAGE
WITH AN OPERATIONAL-METHODS OF A
FICTIONAL-MODIFICATION-LANGUAGE.(8500-YEARS OF THE
SYNTAX-MODIFICATIONS-WITH EVERY LANGUAGE)
~3 FOR THE NOUN = NO-NO OF THE INFORMATION(IN=NO, FORM=STRUCTURE,AT=LOCATION, ION=CONTRACT) WITH THE FICTION-WORDS ARE WITH AN
AILING-(CORRUPTION FROM THE ORIGIN)-MEANING BY THE FICTIONAL,
SIMULATION, ILLUTIONAL, PRESUMPTION, ASSUMPTION, GUESSING, PERJURY AND
WITH THE LYING-VOLITION OF A FACT.
~4 FOR THESE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.-CORRECTION OF A SENTENCE-STRUCTURE AREWITH THESE CLAIMS OF THE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. WITH THESE
CONTRACT-STATES-PERSONS OF THE
(TWO-OR-MORE)CORPORATION-VESSEL-PAPER-DOCUMENTS.
~5 :NOTE: WORD "PARTY" = ONE-HUMAN-OPINION = VOID-CONTRACT = SOVEREIGN.
~6 FOR THE NAME: "UNITED-STATES", IN A COURT-ROOM-DOCUMENT IS WITH THENAME-MEANING-CLAIM OF THE
TWO-OR-MORE-CONTRACT-STATES-(PERSON)CORPORATION-VESSEL(C.-S.-C.-V.) AS
THE TWO OR MORE-PERSONS WITHIN A CONTRACT-CLOSURE BY A
CLOSED-PAPER-COURT-AREA. [HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE USA-STATES]
~7 FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE CONTRACT-STATES = CONTRACT BETWEENTWO-OR-MORE-PERSONS WITH THE TERMS OF THE "PAPER-DOCUMENT-CONSTITUTION"
OR "PAPER-CONTRACT-COMPLAINT" WITH THESE CONTRACTED-LOCAL-RULES BY THE
DOCUMENT-PAPER-VESSEL-CLOSURE-COURT.
~8 FOR THE COURT AS A CLOSED-CHARTER-VESSEL IS WITH THESE CLAIMS OF THECITIZEN'S-KNOWLEDGE WITH THE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.-CLOSURE-DUTY AND
OPERATIONAL-WORD-TERMS OF THE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. WITH THIS
STUDY-GUIDE-WEBSITE.
~9 FOR THE [NOUN=NO-NO] CORRECTION: "KNOWN"(KNOW,OWN,NOW-TIME-FACT) =FACT-COMMUNICATIONS ARE WITH THESE FACTS OF THE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. WITH
THE NOW-TIME-FACTUAL-JURISDICTIONAL-C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L..
~10 FOR THESE COMMUNICATION-METHODS OF THE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. ARE WITHTHESE CLAIMS OF THESE CORRECTIONS WITH THESE
TEACHING-SEMINAR-VIDEOS(14-HOURS) AND
105-PAGE-WORK-BOOK-STUDY-GUIDE.($300-US-PMO)
~11 FOR THE WORD "PERSON" = CORPORATION-CONTRACT.
~12 FOR THESE FICTIONAL-MODIFICATIONS OF THESE FACTS ARE WITH THESECLAIMS OF THE FICTIONAL-LANGUAGE-FORMAT=NO-CONTRACT-WRITINGS WITH THE
MODIFICATION OF THE NOUNS=NO-NO WITH THE ADVERB-SYNTAX=MODIFIER,
ADJECTIVE-SYNTAX=COLOR AND WITH THE SINGLE-WORD=PRONOUN-SYNTAX=NO-NO-NO,
OR ADVERB-ADJEVTIVE-PRONOUN-SYNTAX, WITH THE VOIDING OF A
POSITIONAL-LODIO-FACT-PHRASE[PREPOSITIONAL-PHRASE], WITH THESE
ADVERB-VERB-AILING-FICTION-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX OR
ADVERB-ADJECTIVE-PRONOUN-AILING-FICTIONAL-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX. 1>2,
4<1>2, 3<>4<1>3<>4, 3>3<>4,
4<1<>1>3<>4 :NOTE: ABBREVIATION-NUMBERS ARE USED AS A
SPACE-SAVING-OPERATION
~13 FOR THE FLAG OF THESE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.-STATES-WORLD-CORPORATION ISWITH THESE CLAIMS OF THE 1 X 1.9: RED, WHITE AND BLUE AND WITH THESE
COPYRIGHT/COPYCLAIM~24~JULY~1999 ~UNITED-NATIONS-NYC WITH THE
C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-M. (FOR THE FIRST-TIME-EVER) OF THESE CONTRACTS,
TREATIES, CONSTITUTION AND TRUSTS WITH THESE
C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.-STATES-WORLD-CORPORATION.
~14 FOR THE MODIFICATIONS OF THE"UNITED-STATES-POSTAL-UNION-FOREIGN-FLAG-CORPORATION" (YELLOW-FRINGE,
BRAIDS, SPEARS, EAGLE, BALL, ACCORN OR WITH A DIMENSIONAL-MODIFICATIONS
OF THE NATIONAL-FLAG OF THE HOME-COUNTRY-WORD-WIDE ARE WITH THE
MODIFICATION-FICTIONAL-COMMUNICATIONS OF AN AILING-FOREIGN-FICTION-STATE
AS THE COURTHOUSE-FOREIGN-VESSEL IN THE DRY-DOCK UNDER THE
GUISE-DRYDOCK OF THE UNITED-STATES-POST-UNION OF THE
HOME-COUNTRY'S-PORT-AUTHORITIES.
~15 FOR THESE FICTION-COMMUNICATION-MODIFICATION-PLEADINGS OF THECOURT-FIDUCIARIES ARE WITH AN AILING-ADVERB-VERB-COMMUNICATIONS AND
AILING-FICTION-JURISDICTION OF THESE DRY-DOCK-MARITIME-VESSEL-BUILDINGS
UNDER THE PORT-AUTHORITIES OF THE (UPU)UNIVERSAL-POSTAL-UNION-~1873-NEW-WORLD-ORDER
OF THE FICTIONAL-WRITING WITH THE CREATION OF A FOREIGN-STATES
WITHIN A STATE OR: PARTS OF YOUR HOME-STATE OR: COUNTRY. =
CONSTRUCTIVE-TREASON UNDER A FOREIGN-FLAG-GUISE.
~16 FOR THIS PLENIPOTENIARY-JUDGE: David-Wynn: Miller's-KNOWLEDGEOF THESE FACTUAL-CONTRACT-LAWS WITH THE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. ARE WITH THESE
CLAIMS OF THESE OPERATIONS[COURT] WITH THIS
CONTRACT-STATES-WORLD-CORPORATION WITHIN THE
CLOSURE-CONTRACT-VESSEL-TERRITORY=COURT BY THIS PAPER-CONTRACT-TREATY
WITH THESE CORRECTIONS OF THESE AILING-MODIFICATION-COMMUNICATION-WRONGS
WITH THE STRAIGHT-LINES AND CURVED-LINES ON THE PAPER-VESSEL(INK) =
LACK/VOID-KNOWLEDGE.
~17 FOR THIS DI-STRICT-JUDGE OF THECONTRACT-STATES-WORLD-CORPORATION IS WITH THIS CLAIM OF AN OATH WITH THE
C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. OF THE LIVE-LIFE-TREATY WITH THE FILING WITHIN THIS
DI-STRICT-COURT OF THE CONTRACT-STATES-WORLD-CORPORATION.
~18 FOR THESE C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.-STATES-WORLD-CORPORATION ARE WITHTHE CLAIM OF A VOID-UNITY WITH ANY RELIGION-ORGANIZATION,
POLITICAL-OPERATIONS, OR FICTIONAL-ORGANIZATION ON THIS EARTH.
~19 :POSITION-LODIAL-FACT = KNOWN-PHRASE = 'FACT' BY THESECOMMUNICATION-METHODS.
~20 FOR THE COMMUNICATION-OPERATIONS OF THESE TEACHINGS ARE WITHTHESE FREEDOM-CLAIMS BY YOUR LEARNING-CURVE.
~21 P.S. FOR THE STATUS(1980) IS AS A SINGLE-MAN. FOR ANY CLAIMSOF OTHER PERSONS ARE WITH AN ACT OF AN IDENITY-THEIFT.
~22 FOR THE NEGATIVE-REMARKS “FROM PEOPLE” “WHO BROKE” “THEFICTIONAL-LAWS” AND “USE A FICTIONAL-FRUIT-SALID-MIX OF THE
C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L. AND ADVERB-VERB” ARE WITH THE LACK OF THE
C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.-KNOWLEDGE AND RUN BEFORE THEY CAN WALK.
~23 FOR THE 3+3=6 OF THE FACT IS WITH THE CLAIM OF ANYMODIFICATION WITH THE FACTS “WILL1 CREATE2”“THE1 WRONG3 ANSWER4”.
1=ADVERB. 2=VERB, 3=ADJECTIVE, 4=PRONOUN.
:COPYCLAIMS/COPYRIGHTS-~JANUARY-~1980THROUGH-~OCTOBER-~2010
BY THE PLENIPOTENTIARY-JUDGE :David-Wynn: Miller.
FOR THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE(C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.)OF THESE CONTRACT-STATES-CORPORATION-VESSEL.
FOR THE CONTRACT-STATES OF THE TWO OR MORE-PERSONS IN THE CLOSED-AREA OF
THE CONTRACT-VESSEL-COURT ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE TERMS WITHIN THE
CONTRACT-STATES-POSTAL-SERVICE-DI-STRICT-COURT OF AN
ORIGINAL-JURISDICTION. DI=ORIGINAL, STRICT=JURISDICTION-VENUE
:PHONE: (414) 466-3584 :CELL: (414) 803-5448 :E-MAIL:
dwmlawpro@aol.com
The history documented unravels CONFUSION which is promoted today, perpetuating criminal activities.
Everyone can come away from CONFUSION by empowering themselves with knowledge and not necessarily from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, etc. system which PROMOTES and PERPETUATES those who plotted, planned, conspired against the Hawaiian Kingdom..........
You've brought so many issues up and much is good; yet, mumble jumble ---making many Confused, frustrated, etc.
Know that "as with separate nations are done, we all keep secrets from everyone".................in other words, now is not the time to let everyone know everything...........
Empower yourselves with knowledge and QUESTION issues, etc.
The reason why there are so many governments/groups is because many have alii ancestors and many have history(ies) passed down from the ancestors, and many know the wrongs, etc.
So, from a sociological standpoint, we are all operating together because it is genuinely disharmonious to the occupying PIRATES...........see the pluses?
For some, it took Sai's analysis to help but for others ............the lessons of our tutus/grandparents basically showed that we are not Americans...........
The argument of conquer is an issue because "how can you conquer an already recognized neutral non-violent nation who did no wrong, etc." Add the issues of PIRACY(IES) on the high seas, and the many other points I've been making over time due to intense research, etc. there's much info/ evidence countering this, etc.
Prince Kuhio was not blood-related to Queen Liliuokalani.........therefore, he was truly questionnable.
Instead of parroting what other educators who are really set in place to divert people, suggest that many actually do the research..........it appears that the PURPORTED CONSTITUTION which claims that Princes Kuhio and Kawananakoa in the lead is actually one of conspiracy, deception, fraud, etc. put in place by attorneys such as KINNEY, William, et. als............then filed in Congress....................see the important word PURPORTED?
In layman's /local terms Prince Kuhio "was making any kind" , he was used as a diversion for the Hawaiian people, looked at as a "NIGGER" along with our Queen Liliuokalani and helped his masters.
Did Kuhio have interest in the Crown Lands...........when he was not a descendant of Kamehameha, Kamehameha III, or King David Kalakaua, or Queen Liliuokalani?
answer: No way Jose!
Did you know that the Hawaiian Homes acted to house defenders of the criminals, which includes NON-BLOODS? Did you know they were grandfathered into the program due to former Governor Linda Lingle several years ago?.............I did send a letter of Opposition btw..........
There's lots to learn, and then some............but stay on track with the documented criminal activities.... and like my cousin maintains...."KEEP THEM IN THE WRONG".............and I hereby add, don't fret, hang in there.........sorry if sound like am scolding, but was just moved into posting this.....
aloha and malama pono.
just for laffs - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcxAlAlhp8A
ux-thumb-128 "">
video-actions" data-video-ids="UcxAlAlhp8A" data-feature="thumbnail"">
Added to queue
Tension 6 Intro" rel="nofollow"">Bodyboard Tension 6 Intro
bodyboard tension 6 intro
by jm0069
|
4
years ago
|
364,739
views
Dan Taylor,
I've had two cars stolen, I live in Waianae. My concern with all of the above from Maui, reconstructing history is just what it is. The populace will slice away a part of history and vote on their feelings.
A pile of do do from a sheep is an important piece of evidence when searching for military toxicity.
The mule carried Mary, a stubborn 2,000 year old history that's wrapped in swaddling blankets. Machiavellian--seems intersting when applied to ones assertion of naked savages.
A pile of raw do do from a sheep is an important piece of evidence when searching for military toxicity.
Dan Taylor wrote:
Maui News - November 23, 2010
When it comes to Hawai`i Kingdom sovereignty issues, the courts are like a mule with blinders. They are only allowed to see as far as what is legal under the state and federal constitutions. What is blocked from view is the "lawfulness" of the state of Hawai`i and its constitution.
Any actions (the Organic Act and Statehood Act) which are subsequent to an act of fraud (the Newlands Resolution) have no more lawful authority then the initial act of fraud.
For instance, if your car is stolen, the theft isn't made legal by altering the title and doing a paint job before selling it. The fact remains, the car is stolen.
Congress overstepped its lawful authority when it attempted to annex the Hawaiian Kingdom against the will of its people and government through the Newlands Resolution.
The theft of the Hawaiian Kingdom and alteration of the title was violation of international law.
The Organic Act (a new paint job coloring the title) was as unlawful as the initial theft. The Statehood Act (selling the car with unlawful title to the "state" of Hawai`i) did not make the initial theft lawful. It was simply one act of fraud piled upon two others.
As the Akaka Bill attempts to gain forgiveness for the previous piles of fraud, the pile from the mule just gets deeper. It doesn't change the nature of the pile.
How does one force the mule to remove the blinders and see that the emperor has no clothes?
Dan Taylor
Haiku, Maui
I've never known nonviolence in the native Hawaiian community. Why? Outsiders will always meddle in the native Hawaiian community through social or activist groups. Putting signs away, tent poles in the box and they all go home to their families and give us those of us that live within native Hawaiian communities stink eye as they assimilate back to their white or multi-Hawaiian communities. We sit in our homes with all the trappings of poor and poverty because of negligent on the part of the social or activist groups that com'pa with the State.
Academics and all facets of education and stolen incomes and proceeds from the 5(f) lands are just some of the mechanisms that are used to rip, rape, and raven our native Hawaiian communities.
We show up for some of these social happy meetings and blend in as much as we can. We sit quietly and say nothing and actually agree with the assimilated Hawaiians with their education 'ideals' backed up to the hilt with creepy false citations from out of space. These 'studies' of the native Hawaiian community are from the same publishing houses that are the very same reflected type of thinkers that overthrew the Queen of the Hawaiian Kingdom. We the native Hawaiians do our best to maintain our humanity senses because we want these Na Kanaka academics to succeed in their personal violence upon the heads of native Hawaiian communities. We do this to ourselves is my point. Those of us that not/choose to live among the native Hawaiian community go back to the violence that most scholars don't really know exist in native Hawaiian communities--most times instigated by the white community and the Hawaiian assimilators of the Hawaiian Islands in the Pacific Ocean.
When Keanu Sai succeed in a Whiteman court-- the scholars from the academic community will celebrate and praise themselves with all the trimmings of a UH Manoa type of celebrations. Those of us that live in the native Hawaiian community will manage as we always have ever since I could remember the battle lost by the white and Hawaiian multi assimilated communities. We go back home to repair the walls of the next meddling Na Kanaka Scholarhships'ers that the white people control. And, we the native Hawaiian community poorer than before do the best we can to manage the onslaught of violent waves, that they Hawaiian scholarly students dream up in their scholarly safe havens of a university institute with their new students that find their way here in the warm climate of Hawaii. Or, within some high fashioned hotel room the Hawaiian Civic club will get together in a fancy vacation hotel conference room somewhere in tourist land setting policy for their State of Hawaii relationships. I'm having difficulty tolerating this relationship
As I am reading Paul and Keahulani writings one step above Susan and Leon, I wonder what’s next. But, most importantly, I wonder how the native Hawaiian communities are going to survive the next waves of enforcements. Or, even what are they? At this moment, I don't know the labeling of the next native Hawaiian community wars. I just know it will be tremendous.
We the native Hawaiian community have a published listing of all those that qualify for DHHL on Google. This is a list that can be exploited by the very scholars and their need for student scholarships to continue their theory of sorts. Thus a horrifying game of power and abuse to the native Hawaiian community in public education and life forms. Even more perplexing are the land abuses that are exploited by the 'environmentalist' putting water Hawaiian usage at extreme risk by the very weight of native Hawaiians as oppose to non-native communities. Quality of life exist in native Hawaiian communities far more than white or multi-Hawaiian communities. They just don't know that and I just don't want to spend time wondering why assimilated Na Kanaka living in white communities are so unhappy.
What I do know that the 'wait listing' is a data base that is left out there for the entire global market to be exploited by the bankers and it's assimilated Na Kanaka. No difference from the 20th century exploitation of our 200,000 acreage. Check out the DHHL 1974-75 annual reports.
Aloha Amelia,
Missed you! Just taking time out to read the bloodquantum problem and address the published text as oppose to those of us that feel entrapments from all sides.