Replies

  • Stephen Newcombs article is an important one................fyi

    Keep/Save for your files.............

    Professor Williamson Chang's video/information is also very important........

    1. OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang

      • 8 months ago
      • 493 views
      OHA 29th #3 with Williamson B C Chang.
    2. Professor Williamson Chang Repo Attorney General 09-22-2014

      • 4 months ago
      • 2,994 views
      Press Conference on Letter of Professor Chang to Attorney General Eric Holder, and others, Statement of Professor Williamson ...
    3. Dr Chang Discusses Pu'uhonua Part One

      • 1 year ago
      • 83 views
      September 20, 2013 Dr. Williamson Chang, professor at the UH Manoa school of law talks to a group gathered by Ohana ...
    4. Iolani Palace with Williamson B.C. Chang 1-18-2014

      • 1 year ago
      • 433 views
      Williamson B.C. Chang Professor of Law Degrees AB Princeton University 1972 JD University of California, Berkeley 1975 ...

      1. Kiliwehi Kekumano Nanakuli DOI Testimonies

        • 7 months ago
        • 40 views
        This video is about Kiliwehi Kekumano Nanakuli DOI Testimonies.
      2. photo.jpg

        Ko Hawaiʻi Polokika-Politics of Hawaiʻi

        • Active 1 week ago
        • 14 videos
        An initiative to create a platform to educate about Hawaii's true political landscape and the Hawaiian Kingdom's continued illegal ...
        • CHANNEL
         
      3. William Aila DOI Nanakuli Testimony... is he lying? I'll let you de...

        • 7 months ago
        • 222 views
        DOI NANAKULI WILLIAM AILA TESTIMONY ON JUNE 24, 2014 @ NANAIKAPONO ELEMENTARY.
  • Brah dis gottah be spread around to all the Hawaiians that don't know what really is going on
    • Help spread the word.
  • The US Supreme Court agrees with this analysis. They questioned Congress' jurisdiction. This was part of our argument decades ago, till today. The Ku'e Petitions are a key document to this argument that demonstrates that the Hawaii Nationals were opposed to it. The few who swore alligience to the Republic of Hawaii did so under duress as a means for employment to sustain themselves and their family. Others, the majority did not because they had their farms and not in the city of Honolulu. Under the Republic, the Hawaii nationals were not allowed to vote save a few who were landowners of a sizeable amount of land. The Republic was in name only and protected by the US military. Their presence in the first 75 days of the invasion was there specifically to protect the Provisional government set up by the US businessmen (Thurston, et al) and the US minister John Levitt Stevens under the guidance and approval of US Secy of State James Blaine and President Harrison. Thereafter, the US presence was more of a show of strength and monitoring what was ongoing to intimidate the people of Hawaii. They were afraid that Japan would step in and restore the Queen to the throne. Countries didn't want to go to war with the USA so kept their distance but watched the turn of events as this was an international concern.
  • Has anyone refuted or challenged Steven T. Newcomb after the article was published?
This reply was deleted.