This is an article sent to me that makes a lot of sense. It is worth reading:Do Sovereigns need to cancel their Driver License?FROM: Take the red pill and free your mind!My personal opinion-You don't need to cancel your Driver License, because it doesn't apply to you the living being, it applies to your all-cap fiction that you've temporarily (4yrs or so) agreed as being the fiduciary of; and for that matter, it's no different than having any commercial operators license- it only applies when you're Driving (as legally defined) a Motor Vehicle (as legally defined) for commercial gain. Not when you're Traveling (as lawfully defined) in your Automobile (as lawfully defined) for pleasure or for hire; consequently, you only need to carry this document when you're engaged in commerce as opposed to having it all the time.So taking into consideration that most jobs now demand that we have a valid driver license and a clean driving record, why then would you want to create undo hardship by canceling your operators license when in fact, it's not even necessary? Remember, we're trying to win the war, not every battle!Again- you don't need to start running around town trying to cancel all of these commercial documents to realize your sovereignty- all you need to do is discern the difference between Driving (as legally defined) and Traveling (as lawfully defined), so that when some agent pulls you over on the side of the common-way, you can effectively describe the activity you happen to be engaged in- which would be the fact that you don't need a driver license on hand because you're not currently Driving...you're simply Traveling.Cancelling their commercial documentation is not going to overcome the ignorance of the agent on the side of the road, therefore, you have to be able to educate them verbally and preferably with documented court decisions with respect to the distinctions between Driving and Traveling right then and there on the side of the road, because for the most part they're all simply doing what they've been brain-washed into believing they have to do, and in the process trying make it home safely; unfortunately, they're the ones carrying all the guns and tasers during the stop, so why then get belligerent with these incompetent policy enforcement officers suffering from severe mind-control when it's not even necessary?We have enough to deal with regarding spreading the truth about 9/11, surviving chem-trail poisoning and avoiding Codex-Alimentarius food modifications; so personally, I don't have time to deal with weekly confrontations with police officers because again, usually they have absolutely no idea of the language we're attempting to communicate with, so the way I see it- once I was pulled over, if after effectively explaining the activity I was engaged in verbally and by documentation, if the officer insisted upon issuing me a traffic ticket, I'd simply sign it under protest and duress or threat and coercion; thereupon which I would then clear-up this unfortunate misunderstanding in court using their courtroom procedure against them by putting the police officer on the stand and questioning if whether or not he or she understood the legal definitions of the word Driver and Motor Vehicle as defined by the Legislator and provided within the Vehicle Code. If the officer was unable to effectively articulate the legal distinctions to these words and terms while therein providing clear evidence of exactly how such words and terms applied to me the living man on the date in question- I would then judicially notice the court to dismiss the witness due to his or her incompetence with respect to the legal definitions of the words and terms within the charging instrument as provided by the Legislator and found within the Vehicle Code he/she claimed applied to me. Once the witness was dismissed, I would then use the very same argument to then have the officers testimony stricken from the court record, in addition, I would also demand that the charging instrument (citation) be deemed inadmissible- all of which would of course be based upon the officer's inability to define the legal definitions of the words and terms found within the Vehicle Code he/she claimed I violated on the date in question.
Comments