Special Report
A Proliferating, Radioactive
"Conventional Weapon"
Akira Tashiro
Using Super-Heavy Nuclear Waste to Knock Out Tanks
Gulf War veterans who fell ill due to radioactive depleted uranium munitions fired by their own comrades insist, "We were told nothing," about the danger of radiation. This echoes the complaint of vast numbers of American soldiers who contracted cancer after participating in the atmospheric nuclear testing conducted from the late 1940s into the 1960s. DU munitions are proliferating and being exported around the world as conventional weapons. But what sort of weapons are they? Why are so many US soldiers being exposed to DU particles? The following articles will use photos of the Gulf War and its victims to demonstrate the nature and effects of DU munitions.
What is DU?
Natural uranium ore from the mine goes through an enrichment process designed to separate uranium-235 (U-235), the isotope used for nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors, from uranium-238 (U-238), a low-level radioactive by-product.
The highly radioactive isotope U-235 accounts for less than 1% of mined uranium; nearly all the rest is U-238.
The vast quantity of highly toxic metal (U-238) generated by this process is called "depleted uranium" or "DU" DU emits primarily alpha radiation, and its half-life is thought to be about the age of the Earth, or 4.5 billion years.
DU began accumulating in the US in the early 1940s while the Manhattan Project was developing the first atomic bombs. To date, more than 500 thousand tons have been produced, and it continues to accumulate.
At the uranium enrichment plant in Paducah, Kentucky, and two other locations, DU is packed into metal containers and stored outdoors.
DU is approximately 2.5 times denser than iron and 1.7 times denser than lead. This high specific gravity means that, as a projectile fired from a tank or aircraft, it carries enough kinetic energy to blast through the tough armor of a tank. Furthermore, the impact of this penetration generates extreme heat. DU is pyrophoric, meaning that it burns on impact and can set the target on fire. DU is easy to process and endless quantities can be obtained free from the department of energy (DOE), which controls DU and considers its use in munitions to be "utilization of waste material."
The US military first noted these advantageous features of DU in the 1960s, at the height of the Cold War. It began working with such institutions as the Los Alamos National Laboratory (New Mexico) to develop DU armor-piercing shells for use against the tanks of the former Soviet Union. Production began in the 1970s and 1980s at a number of military munitions factories. The weapons are tested at several firing ranges around the country.
The US military first used DU munitions in combat during the Gulf War, firing penetrators from 120 and 105mm canons mounted on tanks. Aircraft fired them from 25 or 30mm tanks only. During Operation Desert storm (February 24 to 28, 1991), at least 10,000 rounds of DU ammunition were fired from tanks, and at least 940 thousand were fired from aircraft.
A DU projectile from a 120mm canon weighs about 10.5 pounds (about 4.7 kilograms). One from a 30mm gun weighs about 0.67 pounds (about 300 grams). Because they burn on impact, 20 to 70% of their mass is vaporized and diffuses into the air as uranium oxide particles. It is said that when these oxide particles are ingested or inhaled, the combination of radiation and high chemical toxicity can cause cancer and a wide variety of other ailments.
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has set the permissible internal dose of U-238 at 0.19 milligrams per day for the general public. For employees at nuclear-related facilities, the limit is two milligrams
Akira Tashiro said, "Please use this text in any way that will help to spread the word about depleted uranium wapons."
The photos however, are omitted from these postings.
Replies
Can you take your personal taunts and attacks to a private e-mail to Kaohi? Settle your differences elsewhere and I hope you both can come to some mutual respect rather than take both of your dirty laundry and post it on a public forum. Let's stick to the topical issue at hand. It distracts from a civil discussion and takes the energy out of what we are trying to communicate regarding the issues. This is turning people off from participating in the forums which are worthwhile discussing.
I love both of you and can't stand to read the personal bantering going back and forth between you two. Peyton Place was cancelled decades ago. Let's stick to the topic and call a truce or something more positive.
o Pomai