Treaties: Is this for real

TREATIES, CONVENTIONS AND OTHER	INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS OF THE
	KINGDOM OF HAWAI`I
1st	United States of America, December 23rd, 1826 (Treaty)
1st	Great Britain, November 13th, 1836 (Lord E. Russell's Treaty)
1st	France, July 17th, 1839 (Captain LaPlace's Convention)
2nd	France, March 26th, 1846 (Treaty)
2nd	Great Britain, March 26th, 1846 (Treaty)
1st	Denmark, October 19th, 1846 (Treaty)
1st	Hamburg, January 8th, 1848 (Treaty)
2sd	Agreement Touching Consular Notices (Danish and Hamburg Treaties), January 25th, 1848
2sd	United States of America, December 20th, 1849 (Treaty)
1st	Sweden and Norway, July 1, 1852 (Treaty)
1st	Tahiti, November 24th, 1853
1st	Bremen, March 27th, 1854 (Treaty)
3rd	France, September 8th, 1858 (Treaty)
1st	Belgium, October 4th, 1862 (Treaty)
1st	Netherlands, October 16th, 1862 (Treaty)
1st	Italy, July 22nd, 1863 (Treaty)
1st	Spain, October 9th, 1863 (Treaty)
1st	Swiss Confederation, July 20th, 1864 (Treaty)
1st	Russia, June 19th, 1869 (Treaty)
1st	Japan, August 17th, 1871 (Treaty)
	New South Wales, March 10th, 1874 (Postal Convention)
3rd	United States of America, January 30th, 1875 (Reciprocity Treaty)
1st	German Empire, 1879-80 (Treaty)
1st	Portugal, May 5, 1882 (Provisional Convention)
4th	United States of America, December 6, 1884 (Supplementary Convention)
1st	Hong Kong, December 13th, 1884 (Money Order Regulations)
	Universal Postal Union, March 21st, 1885 (Additional Act of Lisbon)
2nd	Japan, January 28th, 1886 (Convention)
	Universal Postal Union, November 9th, 1886 (Ratification)
1st	Samoa, March 20th, 1887 (Treaty)

Just doing research on treaties, so that I can understand the depth of it's relationships between us and them. Being the fact tha there is No Treaty of Annexation

As a dorming student at UH Manoa for ten years, I would go done into Hamilton Library and read Diplomacy, and domestic as well as the time of the Organic Act.

I xeroxed some of the pages on Diplomacy, but I lost the front page. The recent Hamilton flood destroyed all the books, so I can't really go back there.

What you wrote is everything in a nut shell. However, I have been reading as carefully as possible the issue on annexation. The annexationist did everything they could to undo the monarchy and using every tactical means to destort ...the majority 2/3 vote. But I'm trying to carefully reread several sources. I hope that keanu Sai hit that point of contention for the Ku'e petition and confront the fanagling that went on with the US citizens that were here and on the mainland as an illegal and act of war.

I've been researching the whole notion or process for 'treaty' trade or peace.

Cleaveland was considered the 'lttle American' by the annexationsist.

International law do play a huge part in this process because US clearly abused the Hawaiian Kingdom.

It's us or them so therefore, we need to choose ourselves or live elsewhere while the military occupy Hawaii.

I will not fully experience this in my time, but we already are up against their encroachment each day. By air, by ocean and land.

Replies

Kaohi July 24, 2010 at 3:16am

As a dorming student at UH Manoa for ten years, I would go done into Hamilton Library and read Diplomacy, and domestic as well as the time of the Organic Act.

I xeroxed some of the pages on Diplomacy, but I lost the front page. The recent Hamilton flood destroyed all the books, so I can't really go back there.

What you wrote is everything in a nut shell. However, I have been reading as carefully as possible the issue on annexation. The annexationist did everything they could to undo the monarchy and using every tactical means to destort ...the majority 2/3 vote. But I'm trying to carefully reread several sources. I hope that keanu Sai hit that point of contention for the Ku'e petition and confront the fanagling that went on with the US citizens that were here and on the mainland as an illegal and act of war.

I've been researching the whole notion or process for 'treaty' trade or peace.

Cleaveland was considered the 'lttle American' by the annexationsist.

International law do play a huge part in this process because US clearly abused the Hawaiian Kingdom.

It's us or them so therefore, we need to choose ourselves or live elsewhere while the military occupy Hawaii.

I will not fully experience this in my time, but we already are up against their encroachment each day. By air, by ocean and land.
Tane July 23, 2010 at 9:31pm

In 1854, the Kingdom of Hawaii signed an international compact of Neutrality and participated in constructing or refining the laws of Neutrality which Switzerland now enjoys as a neutral nation till today. The U.S. had to wrestle with Hawai'i's neutrality status as an independent sovereign nation-state. It was a sore spot with Spain which the U.S. declared war against and the U.S. needed Hawai'i as a coaling station for its naval dominance in the Pacific. Under the compact of neutrality, Hawai'i would be violating its neutrality induced by the U.S. invasion and occupation. Thus the annexation of Hawaii to the U.S. was crucial. Since the treaty of annexation was rejected by U.S. Congress because of the Kingdom of Hawai'i's citizens' opposition and couldn't muster the required majority 2/3 rds vote, the U.S. thus resorted to the unlawful and illegal Newland's Resolution which was a domestic, internal U.S. bill which has no effect or jurisdiction in Hawai'i.

Today, the U.S. with its constant violation against the law of occupation has inundated Hawai'i with U.S. citizens to overrwhelm the population with its own citizens.
Kaohi July 23, 2010 at 3:58pm

I was impressed after I posted, I checked it was from 'Free Hawaii' very good!!!!

This reply was deleted.