Native Americans |
Kingdom of England(1622–1707)
Kingdom of Great Britain (1707–1783)
United States (1783–1924) Confederate States of America (1861–1865)
Republic of Texas(1836–1846)
*****************************
The Afghans
Origin of the names Afghan and Afghana[edit source | editbeta]
The earliest mention of the name Afghan (Abgân) is by Shapur I of the Sassanid Empireduring the 3rd century CE,[4][8][9] which is later recorded in the 6th century in the form of"Avagānā" by the Indian astronomer Varāha Mihira in his Brihat-samhita.[10] It was used to refer to a common legendary ancestor known as "Afghana", grandson of King Saul of Israel.[1][11]
The Encyclopædia Iranica explains:[10]
"From a more limited, ethnological point of view, "Afġān" is the term by which the Persian-speakers of Afghanistan (and the non-Paštō-speaking ethnic groups generally) designate the Paštūn. The equation [of] Afġān [and] Paštūn has been propagated all the more, both in and beyond Afghanistan, because the Paštūn tribal confederation is by far the most important in the country, numerically and politically. The term "Afġān" has probably designated the Paštūn since ancient times. Under the form Avagānā, this ethnic group is first mentioned by the Indian astronomer Varāha Mihira in the beginning of the 6th century in his Brhat-samhita."
Hiven Tsiang, a Chinese Buddist pilgrim visiting the Afghanistan area several times between 630 to 644 CE, speaks about the native tribes inhabiting the region.[8][12] According to scholars such as V. Minorsky, W.K. Frazier Tyler and M.C. Gillet, the word Afghan has appeared in the 982 Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam, where a reference is made to a village.
"Saul, a pleasant village on a mountain. In it live Afghans". [13]
Saul was probably located near Gardez, in the Paktia province of Afghanistan.[13] Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam also speaks of a king in "Ninhar" (Nangarhar), who shows a public display of conversion to Islam, even though he has over 30 wives, which are described as "Muslim, Afghan, and Hindu" wives. It should be noted that some of these names were used as geographical terms. For example, Hindu (or Hindustani) has been used historically as ageographical term to describe someone who was native from the region known as Hindustan(Indian subcontinent).
Al-Utbi, the Ghaznavid chronicler, in his Tarikh-i Yamini records that many Afghans and Khiljies (possibly modern Ghilzais) enlisted in the army of Sabuktigin after Jayapala was defeated.
"The Afghans and Khiljies who resided among the mountains having taken the oath of allegiance to Subooktugeen, many of them were enlisted in his army, after which he returned in triumph to Ghizny." [14]
Al-Utbi further states that Afghans and Ghilzais made a part of Mahmud Ghaznavi's army and were sent on his expedition to Tocharistan, while on another occasion Mahmud Ghaznavi attacked and punished a group of opposing Afghans, as also corroborated byAbulfazl Beyhaqi.[15] In the 11th century, Afghans are mentioned in Al-Biruni's Tarikh-ul Hind("History of India"), which describes groups of rebellious Afghans in the tribal lands west of the Indus River in what is today Pakistan.[13][16] It is recorded that Afghans were also enrolled in the Ghurid Kingdom (1148–1215).[17] By the beginning of the Khilji dynasty in 1290, Afghans have been well known in northern India. Ibn Battuta, a famous Moroccantraveler, visiting Afghanistan following the era of the Khilji dynasty in 1333 writes.
"We travelled on to Kabul, formerly a vast town, the site of which is now occupied by a village inhabited by a tribe of Persians called Afghans. They hold mountains and defiles and possess considerable strength, and are mostly highwaymen. Their principal mountain is called Kuh Sulayman. It is told that the prophet Sulayman [Solomon] ascended this mountain and having looked out over India, which was then covered with darkness, returned without entering it." [18]
A 16th-century Muslim historian writing about the history of Muslim rule in India states:
"He [Khalid bin Abdullah son of Khalid bin Walid] retired, therefore, with his family, and a number of Arab retainers, into the Sulaiman Mountains, situated between Multan and Peshawar, where he took up his residence, and gave his daughter in marriage to one of the Afghan chiefs, who had become a proselyte to Mahomedism. From this marriage many children were born, among whom were two sons famous in history. The one Lodhi, the other Sur; who each, subsequently, became head of the tribes which to this day bear their name. I have read in the Mutla-ul-Anwar, a work written by a respectable author, and which I procured at Burhanpur, a town of Khandesh in the Deccan, that the Afghans are Copts of the race of the Pharaohs; and that when the prophet Moses got the better of that infidel who was overwhelmed in the Red Sea, many of the Copts became converts to the Jewish faith; but others, stubborn and self-willed, refusing to embrace the true faith, leaving their country, came to India, and eventually settled in the Sulimany mountains, where they bore the name of Afghans." [1]
In the writings of the 17th-century Pashto poet Khushal Khan Khattak, it states "Pull out your sword and slay any one, that says Pashtun and Afghan are not one! Arabs know this and so do Romans: Afghans are Pashtuns, Pashtuns are Afghans!"[19]
******************************
The Arabs
Arabs العرب Al-ʿArab
|
Total population |
approx. 422 million[1] |
Regions with significant populations |
Arab League |
402,000,000[2] |
Brazil |
15,000,000–17,000,000[3] |
Argentina |
1,300,000–3,300,000[4][5] |
United States |
2,466,874[6] |
France |
1,500,000–2,000,000[7][8] |
Iran |
700,000 – 2,000,000[9] |
Israel |
1,500,000 |
Mexico |
1,100,000[10] |
Spain |
800,000[11] |
Turkey |
500,000[12] |
Australia |
375,000[13] |
Languages |
Arabic, Modern South Arabian,[14][15] varieties of Arabic |
Religion |
Predominantly Islam Largest minority: Christianity; other religions |
Related ethnic groups |
Other Semitic peoples and various Afro-Asiatic peoples
**********************************************
The Circassians
Circassians Адыгэ The Circassian Flag |
Total population |
4 million,[1] 5-8 million[2] |
Regions with significant populations |
Turkey |
140,000[3] - 3,000,000[4] [5] |
Jordan |
60,000[6] |
Syria |
120,000[7] |
Russia |
900,000[8] |
[7] |
Germany |
40,000[9] |
[10] |
United States |
25,000[1] |
Israel |
4,000[11] |
Ukraine |
1,010[9] |
[12] |
Bulgaria |
500[13] |
Netherlands |
500[9] |
Languages |
Circassian also Turkish, Arabic, Russian |
Religion |
Sunni Muslim minority Habze, Orthodox Christian, Catholic |
Related ethnic groups |
Abkhaz, Abaza, Kabarday, Ubykh
*******************************************************
Summary
The above ancient societies were deemed barbaric in 1844 by the English and others claiming to be the "civilized nations".
It is now the year 2013 and the English along with other "civilized nations" continue to keep the above nations at bay while considering them "barbaric" nations still.
With the ongoing criminal Plundering Upon Innocents by assuming these nations lands, resources, assets by the so called "civilized nations" for 169 years, disregarding the accomplishments, progresses made by these targeted nations.... the question is...................Who (really) are the "barbaric nations"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SBvLDYWqHw What the World Needs Now
note: This is an Anti War Message by the House of Nobles, Hawaiian Kingdom, a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation
|
References: Chronicling American article, Wikipedia
|
|
Replies
note that a reply was deleted............this is the corrected version of the reply because the dates were incorrect and now corrected:
Glasgow weekly times. (Glasgow, Mo.) 1848-1861, December 11, 1851, Image 2
Image provided by State Historical Society of Missouri; Columbia, MO
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn86063325/1851-12-11/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image
The entire article is important because it was U.S. President Tyler's message in 1851 which affects the Hawaiian Government as well.
In 1849, U.S. President Tyler did sign a Permanent Friendship Treaty with Kamehameha III whose descendants exists today.
This is the beginning of the article which should be read by everyone because this supercedes all that Obama, et. als. are attempting to do today to validate their entity which is neither de facto nor de jure and documented by Queen Liliuokalani as well:
Glasgow weekly times. (Glasgow, Mo.) 1848-1861, December 11, 1851, Image 2
Image provided by State Historical Society of Missouri; Columbia, MO
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn86063325/1851-12-11/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=GsBKFAdo-ig&am...
Summary
The contract/Perpetual Treaty was signed in 1849 with the above U.S. Constitution and Amendments intact.
This means that the contract/Perpetual Treaty is locked in time and the U.S. Constitution and Amendments recorded during the time period affects the Perpetual Treaty of the period.
This means that the U.S. Constitution and Amendments remain unchanged to this day because Treaty(ies) supersede State Laws, etc.
This means that all the Presidential Executive Orders which changes the U.S. Constitution cannot change what was since 1849.
Correct me if I'm wrong.........but Americans can charge those who change the U.S. Constitution as treasonous, etc.
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQP563gKwIU
note:
In 1852, Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III passed the anti-slavery law and 13 years later, the U.S. passed their anti-slavery following the Hawaiian Law with nearly every word in the law worded the same.
Yes, the Hawaiian Kingdom was more progressive than the U.S./United States of America.
- Reply
Facebook post:
- Reply
Hint:
Let's focus on PART VI no. 2 - ABOUT TREATY(IES):
- Reply
"2. This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
Note:
"all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land"......and the "Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
notwithstanding -
"3. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
Note:
"The Senators and Representatives" or Congress, and each member/"Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;"
Note: How many States were part of the Union in 1849?
15 free states
15 slave states and 19 free states during the American Civil War
There are 20 free states and 15 slave states in 1850.
12
Reference: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_free_and_slave_states_where_ther...
15 free states
30.
There were 30 states in 1849
13, the colonies
Reference: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_states_were_there_in_1849
NOTE:
There were only 30 States in the United States in 1849.
and Which States were they?
NAME
DATE/ORDER
NOTES
1 st The first of the original 13 colonies. Pennsylvania Dec. 12, 1787
2 nd The second of the original 13 colonies. New Jersey Dec. 18, 1787
3 rd The third of the original 13 colonies. Georgia Jan. 2, 1788
4 th The fourth of the original 13 colonies Connecticut Jan. 9, 1788
5 th The fifth of the original 13 colonies. Massachusetts Feb. 6, 1788
6 th The sixth of the original 13 colonies Maryland April 28, 1788
7 th The seventh of the original 13 colonies. South Carolina May 23, 1788
8 th The eighth of the original 13 colonies. New Hampshire June 21, 1788
9 th The ninth of the original 13 colonies Virginia June 25, 1788
10 th The 10th of the original 13 colonies. New York July 26, 1788
11 th The 11th of the original 13 colonies. North Carolina Nov. 21, 1789
12 th The 12th of the original 13 colonies. Rhode Island May 29, 1790
13 th The 13th of the original 13 colonies. Vermont March 4, 1791
14 th Until statehood, had been a region claimed by both New York and New Hampshire Kentucky June 1, 1792
15 th Never a territory, it was part of Virginia until statehood.Tennessee June 1, 1796
16 th Was Southwest Territory before statehood. Ohio March 1, 1803
17 th Was part of the Northwest Territory until statehood. LouisianaApril 30, 1812
18 th With certain boundary changes, had been the Territory of Orleans. Indiana Dec. 11, 1816
19 th There was a residue of Indiana Territory that continued to exist under that name until Dec. 3, 1818, when it was attached to Michigan Territory. Mississippi Dec. 10, 1817
20 th Territory by Act of April 7, 1798, effective May 7, 1798. IllinoisDec. 3, 1818
21 st . Alabama Dec. 14, 1819
22 nd Territory by Act of March 3, 1817, effective Aug. 15, 1817.Maine March 15, 1820
23 rd What is now the state of Maine was, before statehood, called the District of Maine and belonged to Massachusetts. Missouri Aug. 10, 1821
24 th The state was much smaller than the territory. The area to the west and northwest of the state, which had been in the territory, was commonly known as the "Missouri Country" until May 30, 1854, and certain of the post offices in this area show a Missouri abbreviation in the postmark. Arkansas June 15, 1836
25 th The territory was larger than the state. After statehood the leftover area to the west had post offices that continued for some years to use an Arkansas abbreviation in the postmarks, although they were really in the "Indian Country." Michigan Jan. 26., 1837
26 th . Florida March 3, 1845
27 th . Texas Dec. 29, 1845
28 th Was an independent republic before statehood. Iowa Dec. 28, 1846
29 th . Wisconsin May 29, 1848
30 th The state is smaller than the territory and the leftover area continued to be called the Territory of Wisconsin until March 3, 1849.
Reference: http://www.50states.com/statehood.htm?sort_by_date#.UEiJkcFlSXs
IMPORTANT NOTE: These 30 States Represent the MAJORITY OVER the 49 States Existing Today.
THESE 30 States are BOUND BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION Which Affects the Treaties.
THESE 30 States are the MAJORITY of the Present 49 States and there is NO VOTING ON THE MATTERS.
aloha.
p.s. The other 19 (20 if you count the dubious "Hawaii") that has NO SAY to the U.S. CONSTITUTION of the Period and the Treaties are:
California Sept. 9, 185031 st Ceded by Mexico by the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, concluded Feb. 2, 1848, and proclaimed July 4, 1848. From then until statehood, California had a military government until Dec. 20, 1849, and then a local civil government. It never had a territorial form of government.Minnesota May 11, 1858
32 nd . Oregon Feb. 14, 1859
33 rd . Kansas Jan. 29, 1861
34 th . West Virginia June 20, 1863
35 th Was part of Virginia until statehood. Nevada Oct. 31, 1864
36 th . Nebraska March 1, 1867
37 th . Colorado Aug. 1, 1876
38 th . North Dakota Nov. 2, 1889
39 th or 40 th Was part of Dakota Territory before statehood. Admitted on same day as South Dakota South Dakota Nov. 2, 1889
39 th or 40 th Was part of Dakota Territory before statehood. Admitted on same day as North Dakota Montana Nov. 8, 1889
41 st . Washington Nov. 11, 1889
42 nd . Idaho July 3, 1890
43 rd . Wyoming July 10, 1890
44 th . Utah Jan. 4, 1896
45 th . Oklahoma Nov. 16, 1907
46 th The state was formed from Oklahoma Territory and Indian Territory. New Mexico Jan. 6, 1912
47th . Arizona Feb. 14, 1912
48 th This region was sometimes called Arizona before 1863, although it was still in the Territory of New Mexico. Alaska Jan. 3, 1959
49 th A district from Oct. 18, 1867, until it became an organized territory Aug. 24, 1912. Hawaii Aug. 21, 1959
50 th The territorial date Aug. 12, 1898 is that of the formal transfer to the United States, with Sanford B. Dole as first Governor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCwOdjympZo
Watch for posts which shows that a Republic of Hawaii was made a State, and NOT the Hawaiian Kingdom............aloha.
- Reply
oh btw...............Is Washington, D.C. a State?
www.theiolani.blogspot.com
posted on Facebook:
What is missing are letters and journals of individual, independent sailors from England who were on the ships to Hawaii (Sandwich Islands) who wrote of their impressions of their visit during Cook and Vancouver's sojourns. They were impressed of the highly civilized Hawaiian society with their cultivation of crops and structure of governance and laws, orderly conduct, warfare, organization and civility, openness and friendliness.
The other factor is that King George wasn't interested in colonization of the islands and agreed to a protectorate status for the islands and recognized the autonomy of Kamehameha the great, his government, laws, customs, and form of governance. Thus, the doctrines of terra nullius and discovery did not apply; Divine right went unchallenged along with the recognition of the Hawaiian Kingdom's existence. The relationship with Great Britain was amicable.
The purpose of the Union Jack on the Hawaiian flag was used as leverage internationally to caution and make other nations aware of the recognition and protectorate agreement between the two countries to stave off any other nation to invade the Hawaiian Kingdom who would try to claim the islands for themselves. In 1818, the Hawaiian Kingdom became the first nation to recognize the sovereign independence of Argentina.
Vancouver became an intimate friend of Kamehameha and Ka'ahumanu of which Kamehameha picked his brains and took advice as well as help. Because of Vancouver's friendship, he would act as mediator between Kamehameha and Ka'ahumanu whenever they had jealousy spats and disagreements while he was there on visits. Vancouver kept in close contact with them even when he was away from the islands.; they had a lasting friendship.
hi Tane,
Thank you for your post.........the English through Vancouver did maintain a lasting friendship up until Kamehameha died in 1819.
The period of the above article was during the lifetime of Kamehameha III - Kauikeouli, and the article begins with the Independence of the Hawaiian Kingdom, a recognized nation:
Polynesian. (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, September 12, 1846, Page 68, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1846-09-12/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image
Polynesian. (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, September 12, 1846, Page 68, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1846-09-12/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image
Polynesian. (Honolulu [Oahu], Hawaii) 1844-1864, September 12, 1846, Page 68, Image 2
Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015408/1846-09-12/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image
Note that this article also recognizes the Independence of the Hawaiian Kingdom by England in 1846.
Then President Tyler did recognize the Hawaiian Government in 1851 and signed the Permanent Treaty of Friendship with Kamehameha III, his heirs and successors..........and Kamehameha III's descendants exists as found in the recent months genealogy researches.
See the following article posted on another thread:
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn86063325/1851-12-11/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image