Forum

What happened in Puerto Rico is happening in Hawai'i; just another reason why the U.S. must de-occupy our country:

The Poisoning of Puerto Rico

The U.S. Navy left Vieques, but for many, the cancer remains.

By Jacob Wheeler

May 3, 2010

Vieques, puerto rico -- on March 31, retired Sgt. Hermogenes Marrero was
told during a visit to the Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatient clinic in
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, that he didn't have cancer -- or at least, his
official VA computer file no longer showed any record of cancer.

But Marrero was not relieved. He had been diagnosed twice before with colon
cancer and suffers today from a dozen other illnesses, including Lou
Gehrig's disease, failing vision, a lung condition that keeps him on oxygen
around the clock, not to mention tumors throughout his body. The terminally
ill and wheelchair-bound, 57-year-old veteran immediately suspected that the
U.S. government had manipulated his medical record.

Marrero is the star witness in a lawsuit filed in 2007 against the U.S.
government by Mississippi attorney John Arthur Eaves on behalf of more than
7,000 residents of the picturesque, yet heavily polluted, Puerto Rican
island of Vieques. From 1941 until 2003 the U.S. Navy operated a base here,
conducting bombing runs and testing chemical weapons for use in foreign
wars, from Vietnam to Yugoslavia to Iraq.

The three-quarters of Vieques' population listed as plaintiffs in the suit
blame the billions of tons of bombs dropped by the Navy on Vieques' eastern
half, and the toxic chemicals released into the water, air and soil during
that period, for their physical and psychological illnesses. Viequenses
today suffer 30-percent higher cancer rates than other Puerto Ricans,
381-percent higher rates of hypertension, 95-percent higher rates of
cirrhosis of the liver and 41-percent higher rates of diabetes. Twenty-five
percent more children die during infancy in Vieques than in the rest of
Puerto Rico.

Early in World War II, when fortunes looked grim for the Allies, the U.S.
Navy occupied three-quarters of Vieques, which sits eight miles from the
Puerto Rican mainland, moved one-third of its population to the nearby
Virgin Islands, and planned to relocate the entire British fleet there in
the event of a German invasion of England. Instead, Vieques became the U.S.
testing ground for nearly every weapon used during the Cold War.

Though Marrero spent only 18 months on Vieques during his tour in the early
1970s, the Special Forces Marine suffers today from many of the same medical
conditions as the local population. The Puerto Rican native, raised in
Queens, N.Y., arrived on the island in 1970 with the task of guarding the
vast array of chemical weapons the Navy stored and tested there. Marrero was
exposed to toxics, including napalm and Agent Orange -- which at the time he
thought was weed killer. He developed massive headaches, bled from his nose,
and suffered nausea and severe cramps. "I witnessed some of the most awesome
weapons used for mass destruction in the world," Marrero says. "I didn't
know how dangerous those chemicals were, because it was on a need-to-know
basis."

Today Marrero waits in the city of Mayaguez in western Puerto Rico for his
chance to testify in court against the U.S. military for poisoning the
people of Vieques and U.S. soldiers based there.

"These are American citizens, yet we violated their human rights," says the
humbled former Marine. "This would never have been allowed to happen in
Washington or Seattle or Baltimore."

The king can do no wrong

Before John Arthur Eaves' lawsuit can be heard, however, it must first be
approved by the First Circuit Court in Boston after the suit was rejected on
April 13 by federal judge Daniel R. Dominguez, who sits on the U.S. District
Court in San Juan. Eaves will officially appeal the case to the First
Circuit Court early this summer. But the U.S. Navy has invoked sovereign
immunity, a strategy that comes from the monarchic period when kings were
immune from being sued. Unless a federal judge in Boston rejects sovereign
immunity, no scientific evidence will ever reach the courtroom.

"The U.S. government wants the case to be dismissed -- the 'king can do no
wrong',' " says Eaves. "We claim their actions should not be protected under
sovereign immunity, because when the government steps outside its
discretion, its actions are no longer protected. We know that in at least
one year the Navy violated the Environmental Protection Agency's [EPA]
standards 102 times."

Washington rejects allegations that the Navy's activities on Vieques
poisoned residents -- even though the government has admitted the presence
of napalm, agent orange, depleted uranium, white phosphorous, arsenic,
mercury, lead and cadmium on the former bombing range. In February 2005, the
EPA identified Vieques as a Superfund site, which placed the cleanup of
hazardous sites in federal hands.

In its defense, the U.S. government cites a controversial 2003 study by the
Centers for Disease Control's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR). But Arturo Massol, a biologist at the University of Puerto
Rico who has studied toxic contamination on Vieques, calls the ATSDR study
unscientific, if not outright criminal.

"A battalion of researchers came here and used poorly designed scientific
experiments to conduct a political assessment that intentionally covered up
reality," Massol says. "The Navy is gone, but these agencies should be
charged as accessories to murder because preventative policies could have
been established after 2003."

The bombing range on eastern Vieques was indisputably subjected to more than
60 years of non-indigenous chemicals, Massol says. There are no other
sources of industrial pollution on the island. Those toxic metals
accumulated in the biomass of plants and were eaten by grazing cows and
fish. Once pollution reached the vegetation and the base of the food chain,
it was transferred into humans. Massol and other independent scientists
found that Vieques animals had 50 times more lead and 10 times more cadmium
than animals on mainland Puerto Rico.

Under President Barack Obama, however, the U.S. government has shown signs
of changing its tune. A U.S. congressional investigation last May into
Hurricane Katrina trailers contaminated with formaldehyde accused the ATSDR
of colluding with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to "deny,
delay, minimize, trivialize or ignore legitimate health concerns." When the
Vieques case resurfaced, a team of ATSDR scientists began re-examining
environmental health data on the island.

On Feb. 12, 2008, during his heated primary campaign against Hillary
Clinton, then Sen. Obama wrote a letter to Puerto Rican Governor Acevedo
Vila, stating that, were he to be elected president, "My Administration will
actively work with the Department of Defense as well to achieve an
environmentally acceptable clean-up ... We will closely monitor the health
of the people of Vieques and promote appropriate remedies to health
conditions caused by military activities conducted by the U.S. Navy on
Vieques." Yet today, the Obama White House remains silent on the issue.

Living in the line of fire

Nanette Rosa, a plaintiff in the lawsuit, remembers what daily life was like
in the Vieques village of Esperanza when the Navy airplanes took off from
the island's west coast and flew overhead to drop bombs in the east.

"When the wind came from the east, it brought smoke and piles of dust from
where they were bombing," Rosa says. "From January until June, they'd bomb
every day, from 5 a.m. until 6 p.m. It felt like you were living in the
middle of a war."

Her neighbors in Esperanza developed breathing problems and skin rashes.
Then in 1993, Nanette traveled to the port town of Fajardo to have her
fourth child, Coral. The girl weighed only four pounds and doctors diagnosed
her with "blue baby syndrome" (a result of high nitrate contamination in the
groundwater, which decreased her oxygen-carrying capacity). Doctors in San
Juan performed a colostomy on Coral, and when she was six-months-old, they
found eight tumors in her intestines and stomach. The day before Coral's
first birthday, Nanette was told to celebrate because this would be the
baby's last.

Instead, in January 1995, Nanette sold her new house for a $600 plane ticket
and flew to Brooklyn to seek help. Doctors at Kings County Hospital removed
half of Coral's intestines and stomach, which saved her life. Broke and
without financial support, Nanette spent three months sleeping on a bench in
the hospital.

Miraculously, Coral is alive today and about to turn 17. Her cancer is in
remission, but doctors recently found three lumps in one of her breasts.
Coral's younger sister Ainnanenuchka, 14, has been diagnosed with Ewing's
Sarcoma (cancer in her blood and bones), and part of her leg was removed and
implanted in her chin.

"I'm 100 percent confident that the lawsuit will succeed, because the Lord
told me so," says Nanette, now 38 and a Pentecostal optimist. "I read in the
Bible that every damage caused to the Earth has to be repaid."

And if the lawsuit doesn't succeed?

"I leave it in God's hands. If I have to go to jail, it's worth it to save
my daughters' lives."

[Note: The lawsuit was recently dismissed, with prejudice, by Judge Daniel
Dominguez of the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, who
sided with the U.S Justice Department in its contention that the case should
not be seen on its merits because of "sovereign immunity".]
_____

Jacob Wheeler is a contributing editor at In These Times.