Forum

The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Land Owners Owns Pearl Harbor vs. the United States Lies Over Pearl Harbor Ownership, etc.

Posted by Amelia Gora on December 8, 2020 at 1:38am in Politics

 The Legitimate Government Series:  The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Land Owners Owns Pearl Harbor vs. the United States Lies Over Pearl Harbor Ownership, etc.

 

                                                     Review by Amelia Gora (2020)

 



 

Pearl Harbor belongs to Grace Kamaikui and Mataio Kekuanaoa who were conveyed the Allodial titles to the Halawa Ahupuaa.

Grace Kamaikui died in 1866 and Mataio Kekuanaoa died in 1868.

King David Kalakaua sold the lands to the United States or so the story goes.

In 1876, King David Kalakaua had an interest in the lands because his mother's hanai/adopted mother was a Kamehameha descendant and one of the many heirs to Mataio Kekuanaoa who was a stepfather of all of Kamehameha's children, stepchildren, and hanai/adopted children.

During the reign of King David Kalakaua, he recognized Japan as a nation.

In 1891, King David Kalakaua died and the United States made claims that they had purchased the lands from him.

The Allodial lands are "forever" lands conveyed by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.

Once the Allodial land owner passed away, the land returns to other Allodial land owners who are heirs to the documented land owners, namely Grace Kamaikui and Mataio Kekuanaoa.

In 1892, a newspaper article shows that the U.S. were interested in purchasing Pearl Harbor.

The claim to owning Pearl Harbor was a Lie.

See:  

1893 - Plans to usurp the Queen was found in the NEW YORK TIMES by researcher Shane Lee .
See:  
 1893 - Conspirators, treasonous persons dethroned Queen Liliuokalani.
Note:  Plans to usurp the Hawaiian Monarchy were in the plans since 1826, 1840 etc.
Even Bernice Pauahi Bishop and her husband Charles Reed Bishop supported the usurpers.
Bernice Pauahi Bishop died in 1884 but the article printed by Rev. Sereno Bishop under the pen name of "Kamehameha" admitted that there was a conspiracy in place.
See:  TREASON DOCUMENTED CHARLES REED BISHOP:

Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, August 02, 1895, Page 9, Image 9

Image provided by Library of Congress, Washington, DC

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045462/1895-08-02/ed-1/seq-9/

Print this image | Download this image

Page
Note:  Japan questioned the Provisional government about the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani.  Spain also questioned the Provisional government about the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani..
Both Japan was warred with; Spain was also warred with.
1898 - Spanish American War was made against Spain.  It was U.S. President William McKinley who started the War without the approval of Congress, and failed to follow the U.S. Constitution.  Thousands were killed.
A settlement was made with Territories of Spain taken over by the U.S.
The Hearst media encouraged War with Spain.  The Spanish denied that they blew up the U.S. Ship Maine.
1909 - Homer Lea, an Army officer wrote a book called THE VALOR OF IGNORANCE which showed the strategic plans and comparative studies of the Japanese sailors vs. American sailors.
The United States was fearful of the Japanese entering San Francisco Bay are and it would take more than 10 years to get them out.  The strategic map showing the Hawaiian Islands, Aetearoa, and the Samoan Islands are shown above.
Reference:  Homer Lea: Author of The Valor of Ignorance On December 7, 1941, Japan unleashed the might of its seaborne air arm on the unsuspecting U.S. Pacific Fleet docked at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Within 24 hours Japanese air raids had crippled American airfields and naval bases in the Philippines.
Author: Homer Lea
Cited by: 21
Publish Year: 1909
Written: 1909

Homer Lea: Author of The Valor of Ignorance

www.historynet.com/homer-lea-author-of-the-valor-of-ignorance.htm
1959 - the American Empire's Territory developed by U.S. President William McKinley was made a State of Hawaii through the Executive Order of  U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower.  
Opposition to Statehood was made by Kamehameha descendants Harold Abel Cathcart, and helped by Mele Keawe Kauweloa who was my great grandmother.
Note:  Eisenhower was the grandson of John Foster, the Secretary of State under U.S. President Benjamin Harrison.  John Foster directed the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.
Also note that FBI's Dulles was another grandson of John Foster.
Reference:  

Evening star. [volume] (Washington, D.C.) 1854-1972, March 27, 1897, Page 17, Image 17

Image provided by Library of Congress, Washington, DC

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045462/1897-03-27/ed-1/seq-17/

Print this image | Download this image

1899 - The United States became two (2) nations:  (1) the American Empire - dealt with Territories and (2) the United States - dealt with nations with Treaties.
Reference:  Peacock vs. Republic of Hawaii, 1899, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii 
1969 - a newspaper article was printed in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin showing that the claim to ownership of Pearl Harbor was a Lie. Pearl Harbor was only a Lease:
 Pertaining to the Seizure of Hawaii, War with Spain, etc.:


"Archives takes wraps off 1899 Senate transcript, Secret debate on U.S. seizure of Hawaii revealed"

Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Vol. 58, No. 32, Saturday, February 1, 1969

The following are important excerpts of the above article:

"WASHINGTON (AP) - Now it can be told--what happened during the longest of three secret Senate cessions, during the Spanish-American War, a debate over whether to take over Hawaii."

"The debate of nearly three hours on that day - May 31, 1898 - and in two secret sessions the previous month had remained locked up until last week.  Then at the request of a historian who noted gaps in the Congressional Record, the Senate passed a resolution authorizing the National Archives to take the wraps off the debate transcript."

"The government's only explanation for the long suppression of the debate records is that they had been long forgotten."

"THE SECRECY WAS clamped on during a debate over whether to seize the Hawaiian Islands - called the Sandwich Islands then - or merely developing leased areas of Pearl Harbor to reinforce the U.S. fleet iat Manila Bay."

"PEARL HARBOR, ALREADY UNDER LEASE, Stewart argued, wouldn't be much use until costly dredging operations opened the entrance channel. "Either we must have the Sandwich Islands," he declared, "or the administration must recall Dewey."

"THE UNITED STATES ANNEXED the Hawaiian Islands five weeks after that debate.  But before the Senate reopened its doors that day, Morgan steered the discussion back to Cuba, the original cause of the war with Spain."

"The first secret session, April 25, 1898, involved technical and emotional debate over wording the declaration of war and why it or some accompanying resolution did not formally recognize the independence of Cuba or at least declare the Cubans to have the rights of belligerents in the conflict."

"THE SENATE ENDED UP BY ACCEPTING the House passed version reading that "war and the same is hereby declared to exist and that war has existed since the 21st of April" - four days earlier."

"Dropped from the final declaration was a Senate proposed tagline requiring the administration to "prosecute said war to a successful conclusion."

"Sen. Stephen White of California joined the unanimous vote for war "even with that mild prevarication" about when the war started."

**************

Note - The following Lies are documented in the above article:


           U.S. debate on whether to take over Hawaii occurred five (5) years AFTER taking over
           Hawaii, a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation in a planned move since 1840.


           PEARL HARBOR WAS UNDER LEASE

           ANNEXATION OF HAWAII WAS A LIE

          WAR WITH SPAIN WAS MADE WITHOUT THE SENATE APPROVAL because War
           started/existed "four days earlier"
 
2000 - U.S. Supreme Court  Memo shows there was No Annexation:
 
Evidence:
 


2015 -  Research by University of Hawaii at Manoa - Richardson Law School Head and Professor Williamson Chang's research showed that there was No Annexation.
Reference: 
 [PDF]

Darkness over Hawaii: The Annexation Myth Is the Greatest ...

blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/2015/09/APLPJ_16_2_Chang.pdf

Williamson Chang * I. INTRODUCTION: ... Annexation of Hawaii was taken down in the fall of 2014 and replaced with the following notice to the public. This need fr a revision of the history of Hawaii by the Official Historian parallels the emerging scholarship as presented by this article.

  • File Size: 399KB
  • Author: Williamson B.C. Chang
 
2019 - Dr. Alfred deZayas of the United Nations validated that the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii exists .
Reference:  https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A294a398c-cf2c-4623-8841-2aaf7cf3145b
 
Dr. Alfred DeZayas 1st Letter
2019 - U.S. President Trump Admitted that Lies were made by the U.S.:
 Admission by U.S. President Trump About the U.S. Killed Tens of Millions:


Trump Admits US Killed Tens of Millions in War Based on Lies
Bill Van Auken on 2019-10-11

Amid the storm of denunciations—extending from right-wing Republicans to the Democratic Party, the New York Times and the pseudo-left Jacobin magazine—of his decision to pull US troops out of Syria, President Donald Trump issued an extraordinary tweet on Wednesday in defense of his policy:
“The United States has spent EIGHT TRILLION DOLLARS fighting and policing in the Middle East. Thousands of our Great Soldiers have died or been badly wounded. Millions of people have died on the other side. GOING INTO THE MIDDLE EAST IS THE WORST DECISION EVER MADE … IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY! We went to war under a false & now disproven premise, WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.”
Trump’s Twitter account has dominated the US news cycle ever since he took office. Tweets have introduced fascistic new policies on immigration, announced the frequent firings of White House personnel and cabinet members and signaled shifts in US foreign policy.
Last month, amid the mounting of an impeachment inquiry, which the Democratic leadership in Congress has focused exclusively on “national security” concerns stemming from Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the US president set a new personal record, tweeting 800 times.
Yet the corporate media has chosen to ignore Trump’s tweet on the protracted US military intervention in the Middle East.
From the standpoint of the bitter internecine struggle unfolding within the US capitalist state, the tweet expresses the sharp divisions over US global strategy.
While those around Trump want to focus entirely on preparation for confrontation with China, layers within the political establishment and the military and intelligence apparatus see the continuation of the US intervention to assert its hegemony over the Middle East and countering Russia as critical for American imperialism’s drive to impose its dominance over the Eurasian landmass.
But aside from these disputes over geo-strategic policy, the admission by a sitting US president that Washington launched a war under a “false” and “disproven” premise that ended up killing “millions” has direct political implications, whatever Trump’s intentions.
It amounts to an official admission from the US government that successive US administrations are responsible for war crimes resulting in mass murder.
Trump acknowledges that Washington launched the 2003 invasion of Iraq on the “false premise” of “weapons of mass destruction.” In other words, the administration of George W. Bush lied to the people of the United States and the entire planet in order to facilitate a war of aggression.
Under international law, this war was a criminal action and a patently unjustified violation of Iraq’s sovereignty.
The Nuremberg Tribunal, convened in the aftermath of the Second World War, declared the planning and launching of a war of aggression the supreme crime of the Nazis, from which all of their horrific atrocities flowed, including the Holocaust.
On the basis of this legal principle, Bush, Vice President Cheney and other top US officials, as well as their successors in the Obama and Trump administrations who continued the US intervention in the Middle East—expanding it into Syria and Libya, while threatening a new war against Iran—should all face prosecution as war criminals.
The real basis for the war was the long-held predatory conception that by militarily conquering Iraq Washington could seize control of the vast energy resources of the Middle East—giving it a stranglehold over the oil lifeline to its principal rivals in Asia and Europe—and thereby offset the decline of US imperialism’s global hegemony.
The World Socialist Web Site described the consequences of the US assault on Iraq and its people as “sociocide,” the deliberate destruction of what had been among the most advanced societies, in terms of education, health care and infrastructure, in the Middle East (see: “The US war and occupation of Iraq—the murder of a society”).
The casualties inflicted by this war were staggering. According to a comprehensive 2006 study done by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, the death toll resulting from the US invasion rose to over 655,000 in the first 40 months of the US war alone.
The continued slaughter resulting from the US occupation and the bloody sectarian civil war provoked by Washington’s divide-and-rule tactics claimed many more direct victims, while the destruction of basic water, power, health care and sanitation infrastructure killed even more.
The mass slaughter continued under the Obama administration with the launching in 2014 of what was billed as a US war against ISIS.
This war, which saw the most intense bombing campaign since Vietnam and reduced Mosul, Ramadi, Fallujah and other Iraqi cities to rubble, claimed tens if not hundreds of thousands more lives.
Recent estimates of the death toll resulting from 16 years of US military intervention in Iraq range as high as 2.4 million people.
The Iraq war has had its own disastrous consequences for US society as well. In addition to claiming the lives of more than 4,500 US troops and nearly 4,000 US contractors, the war left tens of thousands of US troops wounded and hundreds of thousands suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injuries.
What of all the families in the United States who lost children, siblings or parents in a war that Trump now admits was based upon lies?
Together with the veterans suffering from the wounds of this war, they should have the right to sue the US government for the results of its criminal conduct.
The cost of the US wars launched since 2001 has risen to nearly $6 trillion, the bulk of it stemming from Iraq, while interest cost on the money borrowed to pay for these wars will eventually amount to $8 trillion.
These grievous costs to US society are compounded by the social and political impact of waging an illegal war, resulting in the shredding of democratic rights and the wholesale corruption of a political system that is ever more dominated by the military and intelligence apparatus.
The media’s silence on Trump’s admission of war crimes carried out by US imperialism in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East is self-incriminating.
It reflects the complicity of the corporate media in these crimes, with its selling of the lies used to promote the aggression against Iraq and its attempt to suppress antiwar sentiment.
Nowhere was this war propaganda developed more deliberately than at the New York Times which inundated the American public with lying reports about “weapons of mass destruction” by Judith Miller and the noxious opinion pieces by chief foreign affairs commentator Thomas “I have no problem with a war for oil” Friedman.
By all rights, the media editors and pundits responsible for promoting a criminal war of aggression deserve to sit in the dock alongside the war criminals who launched it.
The corporate media has also ignored Trump’s indictment of the US wars in the Middle East because it speaks for those sections of the US ruling establishment that want them to continue.
Trump’s cynical nationalist and populist rhetoric about ending US wars in the Middle East is aimed at currying support with a US population that is overwhelmingly hostile to these wars, even as his administration—backed by the Democrats—has secured a record $738 billion military budget in preparation for far more catastrophic wars, including against nuclear-armed China and Russia.
If the fascistic occupant of the White House is able to adopt the farcical posture of an opponent of imperialist war, it is entirely thanks to the Democrats, whose opposition to Trump is bound up with the concerns of the US intelligence agencies and the Pentagon over his conduct of foreign policy.
While there was mass opposition to the invasion of Iraq, the pseudo-left in the United States, together with the media, worked might and main to channel it behind the Democratic Party, which provided uninterrupted support and funding for the war.
Today, it is the most pro-war party, aligned with the opposition to Trump by the likes of John Bolton, Lindsey Graham and Bush.
Trump’s admission about the criminality of the Iraq war only confirms what the World Socialist Web Site stated from its very outset.
…
By Bill Van Auken
This article was originally published by “WSWS“
 
2020 - 
Paul Craig Roberts posted that Pearl Harbor was orchestrated by many:

Pearl Harbor:  An Orchestrated Event?

December 7, 2020 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: | Print This Article Print This Article

Support Your Website

Pearl Harbor:  An Orchestrated Event?

Paul Craig Roberts

In November, 1944, US Secretary of War, Henry Stimson snapped to the US Secretary of the Treasury that he was worn out “from working the last two weeks on the Pearl Harbor report to keep out anything that might hurt the President.” — Churchill’s War, Vol. II

December 7, 2020.  Today is the 79th anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the event that brought the US into the war against Germany and Japan. Eight American battleships were sunk or put out of action, and about 3,600 American sailors were killed or wounded.

Washington needed scapegoats, and Admiral Husband Kimmel and General Walter Short were saddled with the blame for American unpreparedness for the Pearl Harbor attack. As time passed circumstantial evidence came to light that President Roosevelt knew of the attack and permitted the devastation in order that the American people would be so outraged by the attack as to give up their resistance to being dragged into another European war.  The controversy continued for some years.  I am unsure that it was ever resolved.

When I was a Wall Street Journal editor, the chief intelligence officer of the US Pacific Fleet at the time of the Japanese attack, Admiral Edwin T. Layton, published a book, And I Was There. Layton proved to my satisfaction that foreknowledge of the attack was known in Washington, perhaps not specifically that Japan would attack Pearl Harbor, but it was definitely known that Japan was about to attack in force.  Layton attributed Pearl Harbor’s vulnerability to the tendency of Washington to monopolize naval intelligence and not share it with operational commanders.  Whether or not Layton believed this or simply could not say that the warning was withheld in order to clear the obstacle to war, I cannot say.  Nevertheless, for Washington to know an attack was forthcoming and still take no action to put Pearl Harbor on high alert or send the fleet to sea is puzzling.  Kimmel’s predecessor had been fired because he would not agree with Washington’s insistance on keeping the Pacific Fleet in such a vulnerable location as Pearl Harbor while the likelihood of war increased.

The publisher of Layton’s book sent me a copy.  As a Wall Street Journal editor with a column of my own, I assumed I could write a review of Admiral Layton’s book, but I was prohibited.

I don’t say this to embarrass my former colleagues.  My point is that the Establishment is very protective of Establishment positions and institutions.  The same protectiveness that can prevent the review of a book can prevent the correction of an obviously stolen presidential election.

Americans were brought up on the story of duplicitous Japanese who were fooling Washington with peace negotiations even as the Japanese fleet sailed to Pearl Harbor.  Reading the second volume of David Irving’s biography of Winston Churhill (published in 2001) makes it clear that it was Roosevelt and Churchill who were fooling the Japanese and manipulating them into war. 

Irving himself seldom gives his opinion.  He simply searches out all available documents and quotes from them, and he tells you where to find the documents so you can check up on him. The British and Americans had broken the Japanese codes and were reading the diplomatic and military secret messages and discussing them between themselves, sometimes withholding important information from one another.  The documents indicate that Japan did not want war with the US and Britain and was trying to arrive at a peaceful settlement of the difficulty caused by Roosevelt’s cutoff of Japan from oil.  It was obvious to all that if Japan was denied oil, Japan would have to go for the oil in Dutch Indonesia, which meant that British and US bases in the region would come under Japanese attack.  The documents show that both Roosevelt and Churchill agreed that the British and Americans could not move first and that Japan had to be manuvered into attacking Britain or the US. 

Irving presents a large amount of official information, but he reports that many of the files remain under lock and key and that some files to which he gained access are empty. Some documents have been lost or misplaced or destroyed.  Obviously, the facts are not convenient for the British and American governments and are still withheld many decades later.

There are two kinds of historians: court historians who make themselves popular by telling stories that please and revisionist historians who replace reassuring histories with factual ones that are upsetting.  The latter have a rough time. This is especially the case for David Irving whose histories show that it was not only Hitler and Tojo who wore black hats but also Roosevelt and Churchill.

Once you escape controlled explanations, you can reasonably arrive at the conclusion that World War II was caused by Churchill and Roosevelt.  Churchill rode to power as prime minister on his demonization of Germany and the gratuitous British guarantee to Poland that committed the British to war against Germany.  Roosevelt caused war with Japan by a series of insults and cutting Japan off from oil.  Roosevelt knew that this would force Japan into war with the US. Just as Hitler made it clear that he did not want war with Britain and France, the Japanese made it clear that Japan did not want war with the US and Britain.  But they got war anyway.

Roosevelt wanted Britain at war, because Roosevelt knew a bankrupt and exhausted Britain could be shorn of its empire, and American financial and economic leadership would replace British financial and economic leadership.

The American Empire was indeed the main outcome of World War II.

************************

There's much more evidence, and research is incomplete.

aloha.

References:


* Pirate Eyes On Hawaii Series: "IN THE LAND OF POI ...

You need to be a member of Maoliworld to add comments!

Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

  • Amelia Gora December 8, 2020 at 1:51am

    facebook:

    Amelia Gora
    Just now  · 
    Shared with Public
    Public
    The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Land Owners Owns Pearl Harbor vs. the United States Lies Over Pearl Harbor Ownership, etc.
    MAOLIWORLD.COM
    The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Land Owners Owns Pearl Harbor vs. the United States Lies Over Pearl Harbor Ownership, etc.
    The Legitimate Government Series: The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Land Owners Owns Pearl Harbor vs. the United States Lies Over Pearl Harbor Ownership…
    1 Comment
    Like
    Comment
    Share
    Comments
  • Amelia Gora December 8, 2020 at 1:45am

    twitter:

    amelia gora
    @hwnwahine
    ·
    49s
    Checking out "The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Hawaiian Kingdo" on Maoliworld:
    The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Land Owners Owns...
     The Legitimate Government Series:  The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Land Owners Owns Pearl Harbor vs. the United States Lies Over Pearl Harbor Ownership…
    maoliworld.com
    1

    amelia gora
    @hwnwahine
    Replying to
    @hwnwahine
    Brother Cazimeros Ka Wailele O Nuuanu
    Brother Cazimeros Ka Wailele O Nuuanu
    youtube.com
    1:42 AM · Dec 8, 2020·Twitter Web App

This reply was deleted.