The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series:  The Doctrine of Political Question - Joyclynn Costa

                                                                Review posted by Amelia Gora (2021)

No photo description available.
11 years ago on April 13th on a Friday myself and 3 others stood in front a Judge. We were accused of Criminal Trespass II reduced to Simple Trespass. The day we got arrested they put it on the 10 news about activist fighting for "Hawaiian" land. Wrong, we were standing for our rights and kuleana. After being looped in the system for months we had our day in court. The Prosecutor said if we could prove separation of jurisdiction and powers from both the State of Hawaii and the United States the Judge could recognize our claim. Our point was they could not apply their authority on Hawaiian Nationals. There were 16 arrested that day. On April 13 on a Friday I delivered what the prosecutor requested. I handed the clerk, to hand to the Judge, a letter from the late Senator Inouye. He was a United State Senator for the State of Hawaii. (two birds w/ one stone) He could not come to our trial due to a mandated Constitutional Separation of Powers. I looked it up and found within the Separation of Powers was "The Doctrine of Political Question". In this doctrine it speaks of land if created by another Country can not be decided in court. It is of a political matter between the Executives. The Judge took a look at the letter asked a few questions flipped thru his books and accepted my oral motion to dismiss with prejudice. The prosecutor had nothing else to rebut and the Judge rendered a decision to grant the Dismissal with Prejudice. I know this was not of my doing but the grace of ke Akua that worked this case. You see we were not suppose to appear that because the case was already dismissed w/out prejudice. The Judge asked why our names were on the calendar and all they could say was it was a mistake. My dad stood with me and he had his say in court. A week later all others were also dismissed w/prejudice. All 16!!!! Since then we have lost a few of those warriors. This post is dedicated to them. I miss you Bradah Lonohiwa Kekahuna.
" width="18" />
" width="18" />
" width="18" />
181Susan Rosier, Punohu Kekaualua and 179 others
40 Comments
Like
Comment
40 Comments
View previous comments
  • Active
    What was the letter by senator inouye?
    Joyclynn Costa
    " width="16" />
    1
    • Like
    •  · 
      Reply
    •  · 16h
    •  · 
      Edited
    • Punohu Kekaualua
       yes i would like to know also please
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 15h
    • Punohu Kekaualua
       Hi Love you!! The Prosecutor said if we can show seperation of Jurisdicion and powers from US and State of Hawaii the court could acknowledge my claim. Inouye wrote and said he could not attend my case due to a Consitutional Mandated Seperation of Powers. I looked it up and found the Doctrine of Political Question. I wrote him back and thanked him for clarification. I then told the Court I fulfilled the Prosecutors request and submitted the letter. It is in my filing in the court forever. Rule 12 on dismissal w/ prejudice is base on the merits of the case. The case was only on jurisdiction and land. There were 4 of us that day to face the judge and I gave them each a copy of the letter. They presented it and was dismissed w/ prejudice also. Was a total blessing.
      " width="16" />
      1
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 2m
    Active
  • This is the point folks...stay on facts...the "political questions" were finally answered by the legislative and executive branch of the U.S. government, Hawaiian Kingdom "sovereignty has never been relinquished" within our "national" borders...there are two systems of law in these islands, one according to "Hawaiian National Usage", as provided by the Laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom, the other the spawn of the dirty deeds done by a small band of criminals, now calling themselves the "state" of Hawaii, whose only rights in these islands, directly come from the Republic of Hawaii, that held/holds no lawful rights in the Hawaiian Islands...the key is Hawaiian Kingdom law is the law of the land, the state of Hawaii, is only a creation of Republic of Hawaii, and they only rights they hold, are the rights you give them...
    " width="16" />" width="16" />" width="16" />
    9
    • Like
    •  · 
      Reply
    •  · 11h
    •  · 
      Edited
  • Joyclynn you are a mighty warrior my friend❣️
    • Like
    •  · 
      Reply
    •  · 7h
    • Kathy Watt Morton
       Awe thanks classmate!!!
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 1m

      ****************************

       

You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • **************************
    Reference:

    U.S. Senator Dan Inouye - 'Sovereignty is inherent in the people...does not require recognition by the U.S.' and Joyclynn Costa 'Doctrine of Political Question'

      

    U.S. Senator Dan Inouye - 'Sovereignty is inherent in the people...does not require recognition by the U.S.' and Joyclynn Costa 'Doctrine of Political Question'
                                                            Review by Amelia Gora (2021)
    About 'Sovereignty' and the 'Doctrine of Political Question':
    8672419500?profile=RESIZE_710x
     
    • and the 'Doctrine of Political Question:
      11 years ago on April 13th on a Friday myself and 3 others stood in front a Judge. We were accused of Criminal Trespass II reduced to Simple Trespass. The day we got arrested they put it on the 10 news about activist fighting for "Hawaiian" land. Wrong, we were standing for our rights and kuleana. After being looped in the system for months we had our day in court. The Prosecutor said if we could prove separation of jurisdiction and powers from both the State of Hawaii and the United States the Judge could recognize our claim. Our point was they could not apply their authority on Hawaiian Nationals. There were 16 arrested that day. On April 13 on a Friday I delivered what the prosecutor requested. I handed the clerk, to hand to the Judge, a letter from the late Senator Inouye. He was a United State Senator for the State of Hawaii. (two birds w/ one stone) He could not come to our trial due to a mandated Constitutional Separation of Powers. I looked it up and found within the Separation of Powers was "The Doctrine of Political Question". In this doctrine it speaks of land if created by another Country can not be decided in court. It is of a political matter between the Executives. The Judge took a look at the letter asked a few questions flipped thru his books and accepted my oral motion to dismiss with prejudice. The prosecutor had nothing else to rebut and the Judge rendered a decision to grant the Dismissal with Prejudice. I know this was not of my doing but the grace of ke Akua that worked this case. You see we were not suppose to appear that because the case was already dismissed w/out prejudice. The Judge asked why our names were on the calendar and all they could say was it was a mistake. My dad stood with me and he had his say in court. A week later all others were also dismissed w/prejudice. All 16!!!! Since then we have lost a few of those warriors. This post is dedicated to them. I miss you Bradah Lonohiwa Kekahuna.
      No photo description available.
      " width="18" />
      " width="18" />
      " width="18" />
      •  
        Active
        Mahalo..."Doctrine of Political Question"...awesome! 😉
        " width="16" />
        1
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 2y
        •  
    • It behooves us to kū kiaʻi and assert our rights to file suit to reinstate our lawful Nation ~ the only lawful and peaceful way to STOP the unfiltered illegal imigration of US mainlanders invading (buying up and capitalizing on) our Beloved Hawaiʻi ~ affecting every aspect of our lives including housing, jobs, public assistance, traffic, recreation, government services (lines everywhere), and the very future of Hawaiʻi!
      This would be a GOOD first step to Justice!
      1
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 3h
      •  · 
        Edited
    **************************
    Reference:

    U.S. Senator Dan Inouye - 'Sovereignty is inherent in the people...does not require recognition by the U.S.' and Joyclynn Costa 'Doctrine of Political Question'

      

    U.S. Senator Dan Inouye - 'Sovereignty is inherent in the people...does not require recognition by the U.S.' and Joyclynn Costa 'Doctrine of Political Question'
                                                            Review by Amelia Gora (2021)
    About 'Sovereignty' and the 'Doctrine of Political Question':
    8672419500?profile=RESIZE_710x
    and the 'Doctrine of Political Question:
     
    • 11 years ago on April 13th on a Friday myself and 3 others stood in front a Judge. We were accused of Criminal Trespass II reduced to Simple Trespass. The day we got arrested they put it on the 10 news about activist fighting for "Hawaiian" land. Wrong, we were standing for our rights and kuleana. After being looped in the system for months we had our day in court. The Prosecutor said if we could prove separation of jurisdiction and powers from both the State of Hawaii and the United States the Judge could recognize our claim. Our point was they could not apply their authority on Hawaiian Nationals. There were 16 arrested that day. On April 13 on a Friday I delivered what the prosecutor requested. I handed the clerk, to hand to the Judge, a letter from the late Senator Inouye. He was a United State Senator for the State of Hawaii. (two birds w/ one stone) He could not come to our trial due to a mandated Constitutional Separation of Powers. I looked it up and found within the Separation of Powers was "The Doctrine of Political Question". In this doctrine it speaks of land if created by another Country can not be decided in court. It is of a political matter between the Executives. The Judge took a look at the letter asked a few questions flipped thru his books and accepted my oral motion to dismiss with prejudice. The prosecutor had nothing else to rebut and the Judge rendered a decision to grant the Dismissal with Prejudice. I know this was not of my doing but the grace of ke Akua that worked this case. You see we were not suppose to appear that because the case was already dismissed w/out prejudice. The Judge asked why our names were on the calendar and all they could say was it was a mistake. My dad stood with me and he had his say in court. A week later all others were also dismissed w/prejudice. All 16!!!! Since then we have lost a few of those warriors. This post is dedicated to them. I miss you Bradah Lonohiwa Kekahuna.
      No photo description available.
      " width="18" />
      " width="18" />
      " width="18" />
      •  
        Active
        Mahalo..."Doctrine of Political Question"...awesome! 😉
        " width="16" />
        1
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 2y
        • Yes when you look at, especially developments they claim to own portions of LCA/RP according to the Doctrine it may appear to be with in the courts jurisdiction but it is not, It is of a political matter.
          " width="16" />
          1
          •  
      • Mahalo Ke Akua mana Lani
        To all those who witnessed joyclynn’s Costa’s post. April 13,2018 3:46am.
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 47w
      • interesting then. The hawaiian Kingdom and the USA is a separation of powers. Ty for sharing.
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 47w
       
This reply was deleted.