The Legitimate Government in Hawaii Series: Hawaiian -identity theft version/Rice vs. Cayetano case vs. Kanaka Maoli/Kanaka Hawaii Maoli Truth
posted by Amelia Gora (2021)
The following is a post off of Facebook:
Note: Identity theft can be seen in the case Rice vs. Cayetano, the Pa Pelekane case of 1912 - the Territory of Hawaii attorney general claimed that they were "the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii"; and Hawaiians such as Pea calls a Micronesian(s) Hawaiian.
Pea et. als. were listed on the Genocide Activities list with the Honolulu Police Department and the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii's Genocide Activities list.
Lelemia says it best.
1 Comment
- Lelemia IrvineI read Amelia Gora comment which was censored. I see her intentions. It's important to point out that Hokulea does not hold fully the ike of hookele (navigation). Likewise, ike hookele exist throughout all of Oceania. There are many sources that exist that hold ike hookele with in Hawaii and Oceania. Amelia was pointing out that kanaka maoli, kanaka, kanaka oiwi roughly translated as Hawaiian means descendants to the aboriginal Hawaiians at the time of the arrival. No more koko, blood, then not Hawaiian. Any non-kanaka that settles to Hawaii must know their place and be honest with their positionality. The American Institution royally destroyed many parts of the Pacific. The infighting is intentional. What's most important to acknowledge and recognize our diversities and strengths. Na mea Hawaii (the kanaka, language, history, etc) is still the anchor culture to Hawaii--we are not a host. Host means we willingly want to host and for many Kanaka that's not the case 24/7." width="16" />1
- Love
- · Reply
- · Share
- · 2h
- · Edited
- *******
- aloha.
- Reference:
Replies