THE BEGINNING OF THE LIE
by The Informer
Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king
could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and stole the Kings Title and took the
land of the people. From William I, 1066, to King John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.
The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people couldn't pass their land on to the church
or anyone else without the King's permission, (modern day probate?). Without Mortmain the King would lose the
land he controlled. The Vatican didn't like that because the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican.(WHY?)(1).
King John refused to accept The Vatican's representative, Stephen Langton, whom Pope Innocent III installed to
rule England(religious or in fact?)(2) In 1208 England was placed under Papal interdict(?). Interdict means a
prohibition.)
King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he groveled before the Pope and returned the
title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him. King
John accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and offered the Pope a vassal's bond of fealty and homage.
Two months later, in July of 1213, King John was absolved of excommunication, at Winchester, by the returned
Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton. On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his
kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as tradition.
Question 1. Where in the Bible did Jesus give any man this kind of power over all men and land? He didn't. He
did not create a religion nor did he create the office of Pope.
Question 2. Can you have a third party break a contract between you and another person under duress..?
Don't those of you who are forced into a contract reserve all your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim
UCC 1-103?
The contract (treaty of 1213) was between two parties. Now the Barons of England would not put up with
being slaves anymore so they took to the sword and made King John sign the Magna Charta. So doesn't this act
of the Barons violate the principle of natural law, when they created the Magna Charta, as having no force and
effect upon a contract between two parties? Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party thought so, for he
declared the Magna Charta to be: ". . .unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic
See is brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and the whole enterprise of
the Crusade greatly imperiled." Quoted from G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta. Trustee of the British Museum.
London. 1965.
The Pope, in order to introduce strife in England and Ireland that would help him, used Jesus teachings to his
advantage that is verified in the Gospels by two of His Apostles. So St. Levy (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27), alias
Matthew, cites Jesus at Matthew 10::34-36 and Luke 12:49, 51-3. Nothing reveals the antithesis of government
and religion more clearly than these facts.
Question 3. What did the contract of 1213 A.D. create? A TRUST or CONTRACT. Only the two parties, the
King's heirs and the Pope, can break the contract. For the Trust /Contract cannot be broken as long as there are
heirs to both sides of the contract.
At this time in history we now know who controlled the Kings of England and the land of the world. For Now
we have the Pope claiming the whole Western Hemisphere besides Europe. The Holy See of Antioch ruled all the
easterly side and the Holy See of Alexandria ruled the western side, so there was a conflict. (3)
So, on with the story. The King's explorers had come to America to claim dominion over land by deceiving and
murdering the natives, the American Indians. The King operated under the treaty of 1213 and everything was
going along okay until the 1770's when the bunch of rogues called the "Founding Fathers" decided they wanted the
benefits but not pay the taxes to the King. They, being lawyers, and professional educated men, didn't know they
1 of 6 10/9/01 2:00 PM
ATG\The Informer http://www.freedomdomain.com/sovereignty/inform18.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwAjGsuyF2M&feature=related
Replies