www.starbulletin.com > News >
State Land Use Panel Rejects Plan For 12,000 Homes On Ewa Farms
By Susan Essoyan
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Aug 29, 2009
In a rare move, the state Land Use Commission rejected yesterday a developer's push to urbanize 1,500 acres of prime agricultural land in Ewa to create a new community of nearly 12,000 homes.
The commission voted 5-3 to declare the petition by D.R. Horton-Schuler Division "deficient," saying the developer had not followed the rules by spelling out an incremental development plan for its Ho'opili project. But it said Horton could fix its petition and try again.
"Hallelujah!" Kioni Dudley, president of Friends of Makakilo and leader of the opposition, declared after the vote. "It's a great victory. It's a victory for the aina. I hope the setback to the developer is permanent."
Major setback for Hoopili land users
Developers of a planned 12,000 home development that would displace farmers on prime Ewa land today suffered a major setback. .
[ Watch ]
Dudley had some powerful support at yesterday's hearing, including the state Office of Planning, which argued forcefully against the project, and the heads of the state Transportation and Agriculture departments. The commissioners also heard hours of testimony from members of the public, most of them pleading to keep the land growing fruits and vegetables for local consumption.
"This is arguably the best agricultural land in the state," said Richard Valasek, a nurse who lives in Aiea. "Once it's gone, it's gone."
But that wasn't the deciding factor in yesterday's vote.
The decision hinged on the failure of the developer to submit a detailed plan showing the timing, phasing and location of each step of the development. Such a plan is required if a project cannot be completed within 10 years. The Ho'opili project, which is the size of another Mililani or Hawaii Kai, would take 20 years to build.
"The petitioner has repeatedly refused to provide an incremental development plan," said Bryan Yee, attorney for the Office of Planning. "By allowing them to go forward, you will establish a horrible precedent for any developer to violate the rules and then be forgiven."
After the hearing, Mike Jones, Horton's president, vowed not to give up. "Obviously we're disappointed in the decision," Jones said. "It's a temporary setback at this point in time. We plan to go back and work with the parties."
"I think it's important right now for us to plan for the future of Hawaii, for future job growth and local housing," Jones said. "It's probably the best place on Oahu for that, with what's going on with UH-West Oahu and transportation."
The project area lies between Waipahu and Kapolei, makai of the H-1 freeway. Although designated as agricultural by the state, the land falls within the urban growth boundary of the city's Ewa Development Plan. The city's rail transit project is slated to run through it, and the project would include 3 million square feet of commercial space, with higher densities along the rail corridor.
"It is all part of a decades-old plan to develop the secondary area," said Clyde Hayashi, director of the Hawaii Laborers and Employers Cooperation Education and Trust Fund. "It will provide needed homes in the second city along with jobs."
But Transportation Director Brennon Morioka said the developer needs to address the impacts of "the largest development in the state's history."
"We're concerned about the congestion that's going to continue to grow on the H-1, and there are no proposals for mitigation by the petitioner," Morioka said. "We've been trying to work with the developer, and it's been a challenge for us."
Yee warned that "if Ho'opili goes through, H-1 is going to be a parking lot from Waiawa to Makakilo."
Rep. Rida Cabanilla (D, Waipahu-Ewa) was one of several legislators opposing the project. She advised redeveloping Oahu's urban core, rather than displacing farmland. In written testimony, Sandra Lee Kunimoto, chairwoman of the Board of Agriculture, also opposed the loss of highly productive lands.
The Ewa property, 14 percent of the available farmland on Oahu, is considered the best on the island, with ample sun, good irrigation and top-quality soil. It is leased to several farmers, the largest of which is Aloun Farms, and grows a substantial amount of the local supply of diversified crops such as sweet corn, beans, melons, pumpkins and lettuce.
Steven Lee Montgomery, a former Land Use Commissioner who testified against the project, drew laughter with his plea: "All I am saying is give peas a chance."
But Vernon Ta'a, a plumbers union representative, had a different take on it. He welcomed the homes and jobs the project would bring for his extended family.
"If there's a choice between a tomato plant and my 13 grandchildren, no question, I would choose my grandchildren," he said. "They have to have a job. They have to have money to buy the tomato."
Horton filed its original petition in January 2007. After several months of hearings this year, the developer was ready to wrap up its case yesterday, which would have paved the way for the other side to make its arguments.
But Commissioner Reuben Wong moved to declare Horton's petition deficient, noting that the developer had the right to "cure" the deficiencies. He was joined by commissioners Lisa Judge, Normand Lezy, Duane Kanuha and Vladimir Devens. Voting against the motion were Nicholas Teves, Kyle Chock and Ransom Piltz.
The developer cannot submit a new petition for at least 45 days. When it does, the yearlong clock on considering the project will begin again. Rather than starting entirely from scratch, the commissioners may decide to preserve some of the testimony already submitted on the project.
In a rare move, the state Land Use Commission rejected yesterday a developer's push to urbanize 1,500 acres of prime agricultural land in Ewa to create a new community of nearly 12,000 homes.
DENNIS ODA / DODA@STARBULLETIN.COM
Glenn Oamildan, left, Corrian Moefu and Lenell Campbell protested yesterday outside the State Office Tower, where the state Land Use Commission heard testimony on the Ho‘opili housing project.
View more photos >>The commission voted 5-3 to declare the petition by D.R. Horton-Schuler Division "deficient," saying the developer had not followed the rules by spelling out an incremental development plan for its Ho'opili project. But it said Horton could fix its petition and try again.
"Hallelujah!" Kioni Dudley, president of Friends of Makakilo and leader of the opposition, declared after the vote. "It's a great victory. It's a victory for the aina. I hope the setback to the developer is permanent."
Major setback for Hoopili land users
Developers of a planned 12,000 home development that would displace farmers on prime Ewa land today suffered a major setback. .
[ Watch ]
Dudley had some powerful support at yesterday's hearing, including the state Office of Planning, which argued forcefully against the project, and the heads of the state Transportation and Agriculture departments. The commissioners also heard hours of testimony from members of the public, most of them pleading to keep the land growing fruits and vegetables for local consumption.
"This is arguably the best agricultural land in the state," said Richard Valasek, a nurse who lives in Aiea. "Once it's gone, it's gone."
But that wasn't the deciding factor in yesterday's vote.
The decision hinged on the failure of the developer to submit a detailed plan showing the timing, phasing and location of each step of the development. Such a plan is required if a project cannot be completed within 10 years. The Ho'opili project, which is the size of another Mililani or Hawaii Kai, would take 20 years to build.
"The petitioner has repeatedly refused to provide an incremental development plan," said Bryan Yee, attorney for the Office of Planning. "By allowing them to go forward, you will establish a horrible precedent for any developer to violate the rules and then be forgiven."
After the hearing, Mike Jones, Horton's president, vowed not to give up. "Obviously we're disappointed in the decision," Jones said. "It's a temporary setback at this point in time. We plan to go back and work with the parties."
"I think it's important right now for us to plan for the future of Hawaii, for future job growth and local housing," Jones said. "It's probably the best place on Oahu for that, with what's going on with UH-West Oahu and transportation."
The project area lies between Waipahu and Kapolei, makai of the H-1 freeway. Although designated as agricultural by the state, the land falls within the urban growth boundary of the city's Ewa Development Plan. The city's rail transit project is slated to run through it, and the project would include 3 million square feet of commercial space, with higher densities along the rail corridor.
"It is all part of a decades-old plan to develop the secondary area," said Clyde Hayashi, director of the Hawaii Laborers and Employers Cooperation Education and Trust Fund. "It will provide needed homes in the second city along with jobs."
But Transportation Director Brennon Morioka said the developer needs to address the impacts of "the largest development in the state's history."
"We're concerned about the congestion that's going to continue to grow on the H-1, and there are no proposals for mitigation by the petitioner," Morioka said. "We've been trying to work with the developer, and it's been a challenge for us."
Yee warned that "if Ho'opili goes through, H-1 is going to be a parking lot from Waiawa to Makakilo."
Rep. Rida Cabanilla (D, Waipahu-Ewa) was one of several legislators opposing the project. She advised redeveloping Oahu's urban core, rather than displacing farmland. In written testimony, Sandra Lee Kunimoto, chairwoman of the Board of Agriculture, also opposed the loss of highly productive lands.
The Ewa property, 14 percent of the available farmland on Oahu, is considered the best on the island, with ample sun, good irrigation and top-quality soil. It is leased to several farmers, the largest of which is Aloun Farms, and grows a substantial amount of the local supply of diversified crops such as sweet corn, beans, melons, pumpkins and lettuce.
Steven Lee Montgomery, a former Land Use Commissioner who testified against the project, drew laughter with his plea: "All I am saying is give peas a chance."
But Vernon Ta'a, a plumbers union representative, had a different take on it. He welcomed the homes and jobs the project would bring for his extended family.
"If there's a choice between a tomato plant and my 13 grandchildren, no question, I would choose my grandchildren," he said. "They have to have a job. They have to have money to buy the tomato."
Horton filed its original petition in January 2007. After several months of hearings this year, the developer was ready to wrap up its case yesterday, which would have paved the way for the other side to make its arguments.
But Commissioner Reuben Wong moved to declare Horton's petition deficient, noting that the developer had the right to "cure" the deficiencies. He was joined by commissioners Lisa Judge, Normand Lezy, Duane Kanuha and Vladimir Devens. Voting against the motion were Nicholas Teves, Kyle Chock and Ransom Piltz.
The developer cannot submit a new petition for at least 45 days. When it does, the yearlong clock on considering the project will begin again. Rather than starting entirely from scratch, the commissioners may decide to preserve some of the testimony already submitted on the project.
You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!
Opposition need to mobilize because it isn't over yet. The construction industry and developers have only a vested interest in the land. They lack vision and foresight. The comment about choosing housing over a tomato plant is so lame and skirts around the real issues.
If you want to get down to basics though, if we don't eat we die. Depending on imports to sustain us is foolish and shortsighted. To use "the best ag land on Oahu" for housing is not thinking seriously about quality of life issues or how much we pay to import our goods. A small victory for now but it isn't over yet
Malama 'aina,
Miliaulani
Good thinking now take it further, the ball is in your court.
Bob Fukuda worked for Ariyoshi and Fasi, he-- Bob that is determined that of what ever will be built for the general public 10% will be built for Native Hawiians with 50% plus bloodquantum. A ten percent, or 1,200 homes was negotiated during Reagan years under the Federal-State task force by Rod Burgess and Bob Fukuta under an amendment 'deal' of single family dwelling to a policy change to 'density'.
Think again,
21st century sustainable is back yard planting
Think again,
Iincremental, it's a ploy. I don't understand the whole, what I do know is Ho'opili project counld not land insurance and bonding, if the permits are not incremental. This was staple for DPP during Harris years and I believe it still could be, something went wrong in the DPP with 'incremental' permitting. But, what concerns me most is 24,000 flushing toilets. Where is the weight of the water for these usage?
Watch the minority group (Maoli) mobilize in support of this project. As you say the battle has not been won yet.
These settlements and ethnic cleansing process have been going on since we (DHHL lessee) lost the single family dwelling-owner builder free choice. Around 1984 on we went into gated communities, six times the mortgage, and loss of genealogy or successorship of five generations per lessee. Although we have to present to DHHL two generations previous to Leasing of a lessee birth in the application process, we loose the home in the next generation because of the 1/3 life and the developor 'makes out life a thief'.
My concern is the ethnic cleansing that occurred during the OHA years to whereas 20,000 need based native Hawaiians were kicked to the streets and along with their five generations.
I see the Maoli sick and dying not because it's a happening, but the fact is, someone stole the healthcare right out from under us, I'm sad that when this phenomena flourishes to the 12,000 new residents, our 1,200 settlement 'deal' will be in peril and unable to fix. We must prevail, become medical doctors, and much much more. thanks for the 'talk space' Kaohi
Opposition need to mobilize because it isn't over yet. The construction industry and developers have only a vested interest in the land. They lack vision and foresight. The comment about choosing housing over a tomato plant is so lame and skirts around the real issues.
If you want to get down to basics though, if we don't eat we die. Depending on imports to sustain us is foolish and shortsighted. To use "the best ag land on Oahu" for housing is not thinking seriously about quality of life issues or how much we pay to import our goods. A small victory for now but it isn't over yet
"Although designated as agricultural by the state, the land falls within the urban growth boundary of the city's Ewa Development Plan. The city's rail transit project is slated to run through it, and the project would include 3 million square feet of commercial space, with higher densities along the rail corridor."
Aloha kaua e Pomai.
More they build... more they will come. This on land designated agricultural not residential. I am glad though that this project was rejected. For now anyway.
IMHO the "state" of Hawai'i needs a Growth Management Act... not a Development Plan like the Ewa Development Plan but then when has the "state" of Hawai'i ever done the right thing???
I read what the plumber allegedly stated. S/he's concerned about buying a tomato???... but what about his grandchildren being able to afford a home on O'ahu? Building more homes will not necessarily help local people. In my experience it will help outsiders who will cash out their equity on North America... and buy in Hawai'i thus making it much more difficult for local kids to be able to afford a median $635,000 SFH.
Replies
Opposition need to mobilize because it isn't over yet. The construction industry and developers have only a vested interest in the land. They lack vision and foresight. The comment about choosing housing over a tomato plant is so lame and skirts around the real issues.
If you want to get down to basics though, if we don't eat we die. Depending on imports to sustain us is foolish and shortsighted. To use "the best ag land on Oahu" for housing is not thinking seriously about quality of life issues or how much we pay to import our goods. A small victory for now but it isn't over yet
Malama 'aina,
Miliaulani
Good thinking now take it further, the ball is in your court.
Bob Fukuda worked for Ariyoshi and Fasi, he-- Bob that is determined that of what ever will be built for the general public 10% will be built for Native Hawiians with 50% plus bloodquantum. A ten percent, or 1,200 homes was negotiated during Reagan years under the Federal-State task force by Rod Burgess and Bob Fukuta under an amendment 'deal' of single family dwelling to a policy change to 'density'.
Think again,
21st century sustainable is back yard planting
Think again,
Iincremental, it's a ploy. I don't understand the whole, what I do know is Ho'opili project counld not land insurance and bonding, if the permits are not incremental. This was staple for DPP during Harris years and I believe it still could be, something went wrong in the DPP with 'incremental' permitting. But, what concerns me most is 24,000 flushing toilets. Where is the weight of the water for these usage?
Watch the minority group (Maoli) mobilize in support of this project. As you say the battle has not been won yet.
These settlements and ethnic cleansing process have been going on since we (DHHL lessee) lost the single family dwelling-owner builder free choice. Around 1984 on we went into gated communities, six times the mortgage, and loss of genealogy or successorship of five generations per lessee. Although we have to present to DHHL two generations previous to Leasing of a lessee birth in the application process, we loose the home in the next generation because of the 1/3 life and the developor 'makes out life a thief'.
My concern is the ethnic cleansing that occurred during the OHA years to whereas 20,000 need based native Hawaiians were kicked to the streets and along with their five generations.
I see the Maoli sick and dying not because it's a happening, but the fact is, someone stole the healthcare right out from under us, I'm sad that when this phenomena flourishes to the 12,000 new residents, our 1,200 settlement 'deal' will be in peril and unable to fix. We must prevail, become medical doctors, and much much more. thanks for the 'talk space' Kaohi
If you want to get down to basics though, if we don't eat we die. Depending on imports to sustain us is foolish and shortsighted. To use "the best ag land on Oahu" for housing is not thinking seriously about quality of life issues or how much we pay to import our goods. A small victory for now but it isn't over yet
Malama 'aina,
Miliaulani
Aloha kaua e Pomai.
More they build... more they will come. This on land designated agricultural not residential. I am glad though that this project was rejected. For now anyway.
Of course owners of Aloun Farms were found guilty by the Feds of human trafficking: http://www.bizjournals.com/pacific/stories/2009/08/24/daily60.html
IMHO the "state" of Hawai'i needs a Growth Management Act... not a Development Plan like the Ewa Development Plan but then when has the "state" of Hawai'i ever done the right thing???
I read what the plumber allegedly stated. S/he's concerned about buying a tomato???... but what about his grandchildren being able to afford a home on O'ahu? Building more homes will not necessarily help local people. In my experience it will help outsiders who will cash out their equity on North America... and buy in Hawai'i thus making it much more difficult for local kids to be able to afford a median $635,000 SFH.
Malama pono, Lana