The following discussion of Facebook was posted by Isaac Harp, et. als. This is Isaac Harp's video fyi:
A Visit With Isaac Harp - YouTube
Dec 28, 2007 - Uploaded by Voices Of Truth - One-On-One With Hawai`iʻs Future
http://VoicesOfTruthTV.com - Native Hawaiian rights, aboriginal rights and Kingdom rights. What's the ...Facebook Discussion:
Aloha people, Lets please try to focus on a few simple questions to help us find out what we can agree on as we work our way towards unity. To begin we'll start with one question per-day. After we get some practice in we may be able double the questions or even triple. Here goes:
Question #1)
Should Hawaiian Kingdom law guide the process to restore our government?
Replies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnRaTfq0LTs
All Hawaii Stands Together Liko Martin with lyrics
note: Haleakala, Mauna Kea etc. included in the lyrics
"All Hawaii Stand Together" @SlackKeyShow Liko Martin (an anthem fo...
Liko Martin singing his song 'Endangered Species'
Liko Martin Live at the LEAD, Nanikuli Blues
All Hawaii Stand Together by Liko Martin
Liko Martin Slack Key Master Exclusive Private Show at Habilitat
Liko Martin's "All Hawai`i Stand Together"
AWA Bar Liko Martin & Laulani Teale 9-16-14
All Hawaii Stands Together Liko Martin with lyrics
Definitely things to research.
Something you did mention sparks an interest.
I often wondered about the circumstances and discussions surrounding the passage of Chapter LXXXVIII (88?) of the Hawaiian Penal Code "To regulate the sale of deadly poisons."
There are many unanswered questions in our history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_ClauseWikipedia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbmjkaAebeA O Makalapua
In my previous comment, I mentioned the first step in this learning process is to acknowledge "I don't know what I am talking about and my perspective is defintely flawed". This applies to me, too.
Rigor is a good thing. We should be questioning everything but we should also be applying logic.
A nation can only have one governing document/Constitution/social contract. So it is either the 1864 or 1887.
In Hawaiian history, we see a genealogy of governing documents beginning with the Declaration of rights in 1839.
Followed by the 1840 Constitution, where Kauikeaouli willingly relinquished his absolute authority to create a Constitutional Monarchy.
Followed by the 1852 Constitution. In this Constitution, there was wording that allowed the King to change the Constitution, if he did not approve of it, Article 94. Article 45 allowed the king and kuhina nui to alter laws without legislative approval. Lot Kapuaiwa removed this " loophole", solidifying the Separation of Power Doctrine, creating Article 80 of the 1864 Constitution.
All of the changes to the previous Constitutions were lawful.
You come to the 1887 Constitution and there is a problem. It did not meet all the safeguards our Mo'i put in place. Article 47 of the 1887 "Bayonet constitution" completely removed the mo'i. Compromising the Separation of Powers Doctrine that they just created.
If you claiming to be Hawaiian (nationality) and talking about occupation, some things have already been decided.
But that is a different topic.
Ko'u mana'o