Important Article Review by Amelia Kuulei Gora, one of Kamehameha's, etals. descendants (2008)

The article showing the Premeditated, Planned Move to dethrone our Queen Liliuokalani was found by Shane Lee 2 1/2 months ago......The following is a Review of the article which affects all in our Hawaiian islands/Hawaiian archipelago/ He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii:

PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION.

IMPERATIVE NECESSITY THAT THE UNITED STATES TAKE POSSESSION.

Washington, Jan. 8 - The United States, through the inactivity of the Navy Department, is likely to lose the only coaling station of which it stands in real need. Nothing has been done since 1884, when the Pearl Harbor site in the Hawaiian Islands became available, beyond a number of surveys which have abundantly demonstrated the excellence of this harbor as a site for a naval station.

Note: A deed from King David Kalakaua was claimed for by the KSBE - Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates because it was done in 1876 from King Kalakaua to Mataio Kekuanaoa (father of Kamehameha IV, V, Victoria Kamamalu, Moses, Paalua, etals.) and his wife Kamaikui/Grace Kamaikui (mother of Hueu Davis, Kale Davis, and Peke Davis. Queen Emma was adopted by Dr. TCB Rooke alone and was regarded as an adopted child.) Important are the facts that Mataio Kekuanaoa died in 1868 and Grace Kamaikui died in 1866.

This means that the Pearl Harbor claims by the U.S. is a fraud. The owners of Pearl Harbor, Halawa Valley/Ahupuaa are the John Young's descendants and heirs. Many exist today.

This also means that the WAR over Pearl Harbor was a FRAUD, and hundreds of thousands of people died needlessly.. ....serious business folks......because many lives were lost over Pearl Harbor including the use of multiples of atomic bomb tests in the U.S., in the Marshall Islands, Hawaiian islands, Nagasaki, Japan, and Hiroshima, Japan! , etc.



The partiality of the Navy Department for the more distant Pago Pago as against Pearl Harbor is surprising to those who know England's ambition for securing the site on the Hawaiian Islands and the desire of the French and Germans to the same end. Pearl Harbor is regarded by these maritime nations as the best site for a war supply depot in the Pacific. Once secured by England, it places her principal station 2,700 miles nearer the Pacific seaports than the single coaling station and supply depot which this country owns, for Pago Pago is 5,000 miles from the California ports, while Pearl Harbor is 2,300 miles. The latter will serve at once as an aid in the protection of the Pacific coast cities and of the western entrance of the Nicaragua Canal, if it be completed under American control.

Note: The French did survey the Pacific Ocean and England, U.S. funded further studies in the Pacific. 3,000 miles was the determined amount of miles that the U.S. claimed for outside of the contiguous U.S. All free nations saw that as a threat. Although Pago Pago was brought up, the U.S. was not able to move and assume 5,000 miles because Japan, other nations would be within that range. The U.S. move was based on the "Monroe Doctrine". This in effect put all nations on alert.

In reality, the U.S. President and Congress have limitations of only 300 miles outside of the contiguous U.S. according to the U.S. Supreme Court documented in 1996.

After the criminal dethronement of Hawaii's Queen, the U.S. grabbed for Hawaii, England grabbed for Aetearoa/New Zealand, and the Germans grabbed for the Samoan Islands.

Our Hawaiian islands, Aetearoa, and Samoan Islands were known as the Pacific Empire and was pulled together through treaties by Kamehamameha.

The bankrupt nations had invested in the slave nation U.S. Civil War, losses were great and the U.S. was able to borrow from the German Jews who expected a 10% return in interest. A U.S. representative approached King Kalakaua and our House of Nobles for a loan and were declined because payment would not have been for thousands of years ---only interest amounts would have been given.

Kamehameha III in our Hawaiian islands passed the anti-slavery law in 1852, the American Civil War financed by France, England, and the U.S. sufferred great losses and owed to the Bank of England.

In 1865, the U.S. passed the anti-slavery law with nearly exact wording as Kamehameha III's anti-slavery law.

The remote Pago Pago might as well be in the Atlantic for all the value a station at that place would be in protecting either the Pacific possess alone or any interests she may have at Nicaragua, and Pago Pago might as well be under the British flag if the English Government is to secure the right to coal her vessels and repair her ships in Pearl Harbor. This is what the English Government is striving for and will probably be in possession of when the existing treaty between the United States and the Hawaiian Government shall have expired. This will be in 1894, and although a new treaty is now pending, which may take the place of the present convention, before the date of expiration, there is a possibility that the privilege which the United States now possesses on the Island of Oahu may be lost. In which event, the English are pretty sure to outgeneral the French and the Germans in securing the most important and valuable naval station in the Pacific.

Note: The date of the article in the New York Times was January 9, 1893 or seven (7) days before the move by Americans in Hawaii to assume the Hawaiian islands/Hawaiian government/Hawaiian archipelago/ Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii.

The Pearl Harbor Treaty was expected to expire in 1894. Queen Liliuokalani documented the U.S. as having breached the Law of Nations, she was criminally dethroned by conspirators/ PIRATES/terroror ists/treasonous persons in Hawaii who long sought the island paradise since they stepped foot on our ancient lands.

The conspirators/ PIRATES/terroris ts/treasonous persons under direct U.S. planned, premeditated orders criminally assumed a neutral, non-violent nation, whose Queen denied them loans for WARS against others, pay for WAR debts, etc. criminally assumed a friendly nation, moved to PIRACY and made treaties with their own selves, their own nation, the U.S.

All nations since 1893 have been on alert against the International PIRATES who move to enslaven all people of color/exterminate all people of color, etc. and move towards One World Order, etc.

 
 ************ ********* ********* *******

 

PART 2:

 

The existing treaty, which was concluded in 1884 and ratified in 1887, contains an article proposed by this Government and accepted by the Hawaiian authorities as follows:

 

"His Majesty the King of the Hawaiian Islands grants to the Government of the United States the exclusive right to enter the harbor of Pearl River in the island of Oahu, and to establish and maintain there a coaling and repair station for the use of vessels of the United States, and to that end the United States may improve the entrance to said harbor and do all other things needful to the purpose aforesaid."

 

 

 

 

 

 

With the short time at the disposal of the United States for taking possession of the Pearl Harbor site under this treaty, it is regarded as remarkable that the Navy Department makes no demonstration of its exclusive right.  Although the entrance of the harbor is to-day barred by a coral reef, there is opportunity for small vessels drawing not more than eight feet of water to enter the harbor.  The appearance of a ship, even if it were nothing but a torpedo boat, flying an American flag would be a notice to the three nations which stand watching that the United States intends to occupy its property.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The land on the Island of Oahu can be easily secured.  The main item of expense is the removal of a coral reef which is dead and when once dredged out will not reappear.  Authorities differ regarding the cost of the work of  effecting an entrance, but sufficient of the obstruction could be removed with the available $250,000 appropriated for the improvement of coaling stations to allow ships to enter the harbor.  This sum is in the Treasury Department at the disposal of the Secretary of the Navy, who proposes to expand a part of it in oking(?) out the sum originally set aside for the construction of an iron pier at Pago Pago.  While this is allowable under the law, since the pier at the remote Pago Pago is an improvement of a naval station, it is recalled that the $250,000 was was originally put in an appropriation bill for the purpose of making Pearl Harbor accessible.  When one looks at the relative value of occupation of Pago Pago and of Pearl Harbor, there is no room for doubt that the Hawaiian site will serve the purpose of a naval station infinitely better than Pago Pago.  If the $250,000 be frittered away on construction work at Pago Pago, no matter how meritorious that work may be, and Pearl Harbor be left without American demonstration of ownership, it will not be long before one of the European nations, without doubt the English, will take the Island of Oahu for its own benefit.  This would make the money which is spent at Pago Pago superfluous expenditure.  It is for this reason that the proposition to expend even a small portion of $250,000 originally appropriated for the Pearl Harbor site will be opposed to the end.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no fear among those who are interested in the proper defense of the Pacific seaports and our commercial interests in the Pacific that the new treaty which is preparing in the recesses of the State Department will withhold from the United States the exclusive right to the Pearl Harbor site granted in the treaty of 1884.  The new treaty is known to establish better trade relations between the United States and the Hawaiian Islands, and corrects some of the commercial defects created by the McKinley bill.  The privilege to occupy the Island of Oahu as a naval station will be included in the provisions of the convention unless some acutely able gentleman, as was once before done, makes mention of military occupation of Hawaiian soil.  This is a matter on which the foreign nations are exceedingly sensitive, and the Hawaiian Government is no exception to the rule.  The stipulated right to land troops on foreign soil is withheld except on application.  This application in the case of the Hawaiian Islands in its relations with the United States would hardly be denied, since this country is in no sense antagonistic to the Hawaiian Government.

 

 

 

The framer of the new treaty should avoid all mention of troops.  All that is necessary is the continuance of the exclusive right to enter Pearl Harbor and establish and maintain there a naval station.  The renewal of that right will account to little if the Navy Department continues its policy of inactivity, if it favors Pago Pago and neglects Pearl Harbor, if it allows say one of the three waiting European nations to take the only means of outside protection to our interests in the Pacific.

 

 

 

 

 

The New York Times

Published:  January 9, 1893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here are the list of heirs out of the Estate of Charles Kanaina, First Circuit Probate No. 2426 - father of King Lunalilo:

 

Bernice Pauahi's heirs:  Kalola's family

Ruth Keelikolani' s heirs:  Mataio Kekuanaoa's family

Hana Lilikalani (w)

Edward Lilikalani (w)

Naihe (k)

A.W. Haalilio (k)

Levi Haalelea (k)

Kahuakaiola (k)

Pahau (w)

Kaaua (k)

Kaiapoepoe (k)

Nahihikua (w)

Namilimili (k)

Namakalele (w) hsb Ai (k)

Puahi (k) wife Lama (w)

Kilinahe (k) heirs

Kahonu

Kukahiko

Pamahoa (w)

Kaneikolia (w)

Maele (w)

Kaupae (w) heirs

Kaupae (w)

Kalepa (k)

Maihui (k)

Kamakamohaha (k)

 

 

*Kamehameha Trusts aka's - includes the Trusts held in several banks such as San Francisco, China, American Savings Bank which secures the Coins of the Realm, the gold coins which was formerly banked by Charles Reed Bishop, his banks, etc.

 

This has been researched and verified by a Royal person, a representative of our Royal families, and Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs.