By Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide Watch

Classification Symbolization Dehumanization Organization Polarization Preparation Extermination Denial

Genocide is a process that develops in eight stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The process is not linear. Logically, later stages must be preceded by earlier stages. But all stages continue to operate throughout the process.


1. CLASSIFICATION: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide. The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend ethnic or racial divisions, that actively promote tolerance and understanding, and that promote classifications that transcend the divisions. The Catholic church could have played this role in Rwanda, had it not been riven by the same ethnic cleavages as Rwandan society. Promotion of a common language in countries like Tanzania has also promoted transcendent national identity. This search for common ground is vital to early prevention of genocide.

2. SYMBOLIZATION: We give names or other symbols to the classifications. We name people “Jews” or “Gypsies”, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply the symbols to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to the next stage, dehumanization. When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups: the yellow star for Jews under Nazi rule, the blue scarf for people from the Eastern Zone in Khmer Rouge Cambodia. To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden (swastikas) as can hate speech. Group marking like gang clothing or tribal scarring can be outlawed, as well. The problem is that legal limitations will fail if unsupported by popular cultural enforcement. Though Hutu and Tutsi were forbidden words in Burundi until the 1980’s, code-words replaced them. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Bulgaria, where the government refused to supply enough yellow badges and at least eighty percent of Jews did not wear them, depriving the yellow star of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.

3. DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. At this stage, hate propaganda in print and on hate radios is used to vilify the victim group. In combating this dehumanization, incitement to genocide should not be confused with protected speech. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than democracies. Local and international leaders should condemn the use of hate speech and make it culturally unacceptable. Leaders who incite genocide should be banned from international travel and have their foreign finances frozen. Hate radio stations should be shut down, and hate propaganda banned. Hate crimes and atrocities should be promptly punished.

4. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, often using militias to provide deniability of state responsibility (the Janjaweed in Darfur.) Sometimes organization is informal (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants) or decentralized (terrorist groups.) Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Plans are made for genocidal killings. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations, as was done in post-genocide Rwanda.

5. POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Moderates from the perpetrators’ own group are most able to stop genocide, so are the first to be arrested and killed. Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas for international travel denied to them. Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.

6. PREPARATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is expropriated. They are often segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Otherwise, at least humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.

7. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. (An unsafe “safe” area is worse than none at all.) The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade, EU Rapid Response Force, or regional forces -- should be authorized to act by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N. should intervene. If the U.N. is paralyzed, regional alliances must act. It is time to recognize that the international responsibility to protect transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If strong nations will not provide troops to intervene directly, they should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene.

8. DENIAL is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence can be heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, or an international tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or an International Criminal Court may not deter the worst genocidal killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice.

© 1998 Gregory H. Stanton. Originally presented as a briefing paper at the US State Department in 1996.

 

This is a piece that one could use to build skills on genocide.

You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Amelia,

    Just in case one see's this site but no need read will repost to another site.

    Colonel Douglas S. Mulbury, Commanding
    All Military and Public Citizens

    I was with Pono Kealoha last night at Wheeler Air Force Base, it was an unbelieveable night with tremedous amount of violence. That was set forth by Amaral and her 'library phony native Hawaiian group'. She stole the very soul's of our ancestors and ho'okupu their bones to a violent entity. Amazing night out with Pono!!!
    • o LuLu BELL, The Hate and Lies that you say of me and others on Maoliworld reflects back to your parents and your ancestors. Shame on you to bring such HEWA Reflections to your parents and your ancestors with such Dishonor to them. No one on Maoliworld speaks with such Hate and Lies as you, Kaohi. The next time you Open Your Mouth, you need to think of your parents and ancestors and not your selfest needs and wants.
      Long Live The Hawaiian Kingdom, o Pomaikaiokalani, Hawaiian Kingdom National Royalist 1993
  • Unbelieveable night out with Pono Kealoha!!!!!

    Link Should Follow... newbie here trying some thing new


    Thomas Joseph Lenchanko, Hawaiian National and Private Citizen
    Spokesperson for Hawaiian Lineal Descendants
    931 Uakanikoo Street
    Wahiawa, Island of O’ahu
    Ko Hawaii Pae Aina (96786)

    Tuesday September 21, 2010

    United States Federal Government, et al
    Department of the Army
    US Army Installation Management Command, Pacific Region
    Headquarters, United States Army Garrison-Hawaii
    851 Wright Avenue, Wheeler Army Airfield
    Schofield Barracks Military Reservation, Hawaii 96857-5000

    Colonel Douglas S. Mulbury, Commanding
    All Military and Public Citizens

    LAWFUL NOTICE: TO: COLONEL DOUGLAS S. MULBURY, COMMANDING
    NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST UNLAWFUL ACTIONS BY YOUR
    AGENTS ON FOREIGN HAWAIIAN NATIONAL AINA IN CONFLICT
    WITH RIGHTS AND IN OUTRIGHT DEFIANCE OF CULTURAL
    RIGHTS AND PRACTICES OF HAWAIIAN NATIONALS

    REGARDING: DISRESPECTFULLY REMOVING IDENTIFIED HAWAIIAN NATIONAL
    HUMAN REMAINS (IWIKUPUNA) FROM GRAVESITES AT HALEAUAU,
    LIHUE, ISLAND OF O’AHU, KO HAWAII PAE AINA

    Colonel Doulas S. Mulbury:

    The identification of aina [family} whom will require assistance to
    access the reservation:
    1- Thomas Joseph Lenchanko
    2- Aran Alton Ardaiz
    3- Kalama Makaneole
    4- Summer Mullins
    5- Robert Oliveira Jr.
    6- Pono K. Kealoha
    7- aina [family]noted, listed and cc’d

    “Corrective actions”

    Please be prepared with identified counsel so we may resolve this
    specific matter of exposure, damages and scattering of our iwikupuna
    [human remains]; and to provide the United States Military, et al,
    the opportunity to reveal and affirm ownership of the land sites in
    question.

    We do not authorize nor approve of your foreign methods of handling
    our aina [family]iwikupuna [human remains]; and we continue to object
    to your organization’s suppression of the lawful rights of Hawaiian
    National Private Citizens and our Hawaiian Kingdom National Government.

    Subsequently, your actions continue to appear intentional and are an
    affront and an insult to the living of our deceased whom are buried in
    our land.

    Please have staff contact me in a timely manner with an understanding
    for our access to the reservation for said meeting with you on Thursday
    September 23, 2010.

    oia ua ‘ike a ‘aia la

    Thomas Joseph Lenchanko, Hawaiian National
    kahuaka’i ola ko laila waha olelo ‘Aha Kukaniloko/Koa Mana mea ola kanaka mauli
  • 7. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. (An unsafe “safe” area is worse than none at all.) The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade, EU Rapid Response Force, or regional forces -- should be authorized to act by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N. should intervene. If the U.N. is paralyzed, regional alliances must act. It is time to recognize that the international responsibility to protect transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If strong nations will not provide troops to intervene directly, they should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene.
    • "Hawaiian By Blood, American By Force" Genocide of the native Hawaiian people.

      Long Live The Hawaiian Kingdom, o Pomaikaiokalani, Hawaiian Kingdom National Royalist 1993
  • Mahu,

    It is of my opinion that any genocide occurrence especially in native communities started with foolishness. Foolishness among men and their gender partner's can be trying in a hetero society. In Hawaii again, it is of my opinion that genocide started with Kamehameha I and a Mahu society. Many battles were fought as well as changes in the order of rules. A heterosexual couple--male and female is fairly new to Hawaii and its first people. Given this context of ‘mahu’ and hetero-- I believe that 'violence' between groups manifest a fertile political ground for Na Kanaka and modern day Hawaiians.

    A clown, and a huge audience combine can make 'talking groups’ into a mixture different swirling pools.

    However, with skill and compassion for humanity and their ancestor’s one can work through the cause of the message and gain strength to build a nation? A nation of 'goodness' for first people and their changes of society ought not to debunk their ancestral lands. Both groups Mahu and Ohana can work together and lead comfortably in today’s society.
  • Genocide has many facets for understanding and meaning. This piece is a bit 'tricky' however worth taking apart. Like a mystery one would like to know more about the author's intent and why or for whom did he write this piece. What is the author's intent or purpose is good to know? And who is this author? Are all questions I am asking valid and sticking to the author's purpose?

    "1. CLASSIFICATION: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide. The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend ethnic or racial divisions, that actively promote tolerance and understanding, and that promote classifications that transcend the divisions. The Catholic church could have played this role in Rwanda, had it not been riven by the same ethnic cleavages as Rwandan society. Promotion of a common language in countries like Tanzania has also promoted transcendent national identity. This search for common ground is vital to early prevention of genocide."

    Here are my thoughts:

    Without a doubt in my mind likeness is unimportant, but it is the core of this piece. Preventing genocide is about a ‘shift’ as in one up. What I mean is one would intend to do no harm therefore he does well by his society. The author speaks of ‘all’ or absolute. He goes on to compartmentalize persons by race, beliefs, national origin. He changes his stance to ‘slice’ by two or Noah’s Ark. Determine Africa as the Mecca of genocide. In retrospect, earthly divisions as oppose to generalizing the ‘it is’. I’m a bit rusty on Paul Sartre, but find the ‘is or
    God -like part interesting. In addition, Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli favorite subject to master the Princeand his Kingdom or tribe.

    Author repeats to narrow the divisor to race, my thoughts are to give oneself more power over the earthly people, he classifies to divide for a push and pull tension. Loss of language was always used as an absolute tool to conquer ones opposition or a desire to change one’s identity to fit a more desirable nation. Making life easier and we all want that change to occur, but the question one might ask—are we turning in on ones culture—the ultimate sell out? Such as loss to taro patches, religion, language for the ultimate goal as in change to develop one’s quest for an easier life style? The ideal question is to ask at this point is the author searching for individualism as oppose to a group. I would say yes and assert that the author prefers his own individual powers over the different cultures which are a bit simplistic. I see this institutionalized thought process as a typical university student to narrow down one’s argument. Students have yet to use the tools of inquiry to research one’s own assumptions which I believe Kaleo tried to do in his ‘talk story’ on U-Stream.

    The monarchy its Hawaiian Kingdom and the wannabee Prince have a touch of Machiavelli'ian. It’s a difficult process to understand and apply, but warrants the energy and resources. Why? Because when teachers come to Hawaii from the US of America--what do you think they are doing in their classroom and with our children? Are the contents clear and is their facts fairly presented, or manipulated?
This reply was deleted.