PIRATES ALEXANDER & BALDWIN CREATED THE SOVEREIGN KINGDOM OF HAWAII TO STEAL LANDS!
researched by Amelia Gora (2016)
The following UCC/Uniform Commercial Code - American filing was found at the Bureau of Conveyances, Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands with the Jurisdiction: Sovereign Kingdom of Hawaii made in 2007!
Replies
The Founders' Story
In 1843, Samuel Thomas Alexander and Henry Perrine Baldwin, sons of pioneer missionaries, met in Lahaina, Maui. They grew up together, became close friends and went on to develop a sugar-growing partnership that spanned generations and left an indelible mark on Hawaii.
Alexander was the idea man, more outgoing and adventurous of the two. He had a gift for raising money to support his business projects. Baldwin was more reserved and considered the "doer" of the partners; he completed the projects conceived by Alexander.
After studying on the Mainland, Alexander returned to Maui and began teaching at Lahainaluna, where he and his students successfully grew sugar cane and bananas. Word of the venture spread to the owner of Waihee sugar plantation near Wailuku, and Alexander was offered the manager's position. He hired Baldwin as his assistant, who at the time was helping his brother raise sugar cane in Lahaina. This was the beginning of a lifelong working partnership.
By 1869, the young men - Alexander was 33, Baldwin, 27 - were ready to launch their own business. Still working at Waihee, they purchased 12 acres of Bush Ranch in the Sunnyside area of Makawao on Maui for $110, to grow sugar cane. The following year, they paid $8,000 for an additional 559 acres. That same year, the partners planted sugar cane on their land marking the birth of what would become Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
By 1876, the partners had expanded their sugar acreage and begun to seek a reliable source of water for their crop. Although not an engineer, Alexander devised an irrigation system that would bring water from the windward slopes of Haleakala to Central Maui to irrigate 3,000 acres of cane - their own and neighboring plantations. Baldwin oversaw the Hamakua Ditch project, known today as East Maui Irrigation Company (the oldest subsidiary of A&B), and within two years the ditch was complete. This system would later become a model for similar Hawaii irrigation projects.
Over the next thirty years, the two men became agents for nearly a dozen plantations and expanded their plantation interests by acquiring Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company and Kahului Railroad. In 1883, Alexander and Baldwin formalized their partnership by incorporating their sugar business as the Paia Plantation also known at various times as Samuel T. Alexander & Co., Haleakala Sugar Co., and Alexander & Baldwin Plantation. By spring of 1900, A&B had outgrown its partnership organization and plans were made to incorporate the company, allowing the company to increase capitalization and facilitate expansion.
The Articles of Association and affidavit of the president, secretary and treasurer were filed June 30, 1900 with the treasurer of the Territory of Hawaii. Alexander & Baldwin, Limited became a Hawaii corporation, with its principal office in Honolulu and with a branch office in San Francisco. All the partnership's assets, valued at $1.5 million, were transferred to the new corporation. Bylaws were adopted, and nine days later, at a special meeting of stockholders, the Board of Directors that consisted of Joseph P. Cooke, Wallace M. Alexander, James B. Castle, Henry Baldwin and Samuel Alexander (five former partners of A&B agency) elected Henry Baldwin president of the new company.
Shortly after, in 1904, Samuel Alexander passed away on one of his adventures. While hiking with his daughter to the edge of Victoria Falls, Africa, he was struck by a boulder. Seven years later, Baldwin passed away at the age of 68 from failing health.
What started off as partnership between two young men, with the purchase of 12 acres in Maui for $110, has grown into a corporation with $2.2 billion in assets, including 87,870 acres of land. After the passing of the founders, Alexander & Baldwin continued to expand their sugar operations by acquiring additional land, developing essential water resources and investing in shipping to bring supplies to Hawaii and transport sugar to the U.S. Mainland markets. These land and water resources, originally acquired for agricultural purposes, would eventually become the foundation of A&B's strength and success today.
Reference: http://www.abprop.com/about-us/history.php
Note: Organic Act allowed corporations only 1,000 acres, the rest were to be transferred to the U.S. government.
News
Press Releases
KS and Alexander & Baldwin announce agreement for residential ...
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. | Premier Hawaii Company
Kamehameha Schools And Alexander & Baldwin Announce ...
A&B Properties And Kamehameha Schools Unveil Plans For A Unique...
Alexander & Baldwin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Alexander & Baldwin paid $23M to buy Kakaako lot from ...
Brad Santiago, CCIM | LinkedIn
Alexander & Baldwin Inc. Archives - Kaka'ako Properties
Landlocked | Hawaii Business Magazine
Alexander & Baldwin Awards Scholarships to Maui Students - Maui...
Searches related to about KSBE and Alexander & Baldwin
alexander and baldwin maui
alexander and baldwin properties
alexander and baldwin history
alexander and baldwin board of directors
alexander and baldwin kailua
alexander and baldwin sugar company
alexander and baldwin properties maui
nyse alex
More Subsidiaries:
Our History
The Beginning
Well over a century old, HC&S began as a small Maui sugarcane plantation founded by two childhood friends.
Augmenting their original investment in 12 acres below Makawao, Maui, with the acquisition of an additional 559 acres, Samuel Thomas Alexander and Henry Perrine Baldwin planted their first sugarcane crop in 1870 on their newly established Alexander and Baldwin plantation. Over the next three decades, they acquired a number of neighboring plantations that, together with their original plantation, formed Maui Agricultural Company.
During that time, the partners invested in the development of essential water resources for their 3,000 acres and neighboring plantations. The Hamakua Ditch was an elaborate system of tunnels, ditches, siphons, flumes and reservoirs built over 17 miles of mountainous terrain – an engineering feat that would help shape water reclamation and irrigation procedures used by major projects on the U.S. mainland.
In 1948, Maui Agricultural Company and HC&S merged, keeping the HC&S name and becoming the largest sugar producer in the United States. In 1962, HC&S merged with, and became a division of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
Over time, generation after generation of Maui residents have brought their skills, ingenuity, commitment and community-mindedness to HC&S. We are proud of our company’s heritage and the important role it has played in Maui’s history.
Company Milestones
1870-1900
1901-1950
1951-2000
2001-Present
Historic methods of cultivation and irrigation.
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company has grown through a series of mergers over the years that combined 14 sugar plantations, including the original plantation of Samuel T. Alexander and Henry P. Baldwin, whose partnership grew into Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., HC&S's parent company.
HC&S was incorporated in 1882, came into the Alexander & Baldwin family of companies in 1898, and was finally merged into Alexander & Baldwin in 1962.
One of the key projects of the plantation's founders was the construction of the irrigation system that brings mountain water from the rainy slopes of East Maui to the Island's arid central saddle lands. This A&B-owned system of over 74 miles of tunnels and ditches is the largest private water system in the U.S. About 40,000 Upcountry Maui residents and farmers (over one fourth of the Island's population) are also supplied water from this system.
HC&S's Puunene Sugar Mill, built in 1901, has been modernized (it was the world's first fully computer controlled sugar factory) and has a rated capacity of 7,500 tons of cane per day.
Agribusiness
A&B’s legacy is its agriculture business. And, the Company also owns a number of related service companies that support its agricultural operations.
HC&S
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company is the state’s largest farm, with 36,000 acres under cultivation. The Company also generates enough electricity, primarily from renewable sources, to be 100% energy self-sufficient. On January 6, the Company announced that it will be ceasing its sugar operations as of the end of 2016, and transitioning to a new diversified agricultural model.
McBryde Resources, Inc.
McBryde Resources, Inc. provides essential infrastructure and services to support active agriculture on 4,000 acres of A&B-owned lands on Kauai, including the generation of renewable energy from its hydroelectric facilities in Kalaheo and Wainiha, Kauai. These lands are farmed in cooperation with third party tenants.
A&B Fleet Services
A&B Fleet Services provides fleet-related parts and repair services on the Big Island and Kauai.
Kahului Trucking & Storage, Inc.
KT&S has been integral in the growth of Maui, transporting goods and materials throughout the island since 1879. We started in rail, evolved to trucking and now offer full service container freight and dump trucking service, self-storage, truck and equipment sales and rentals, and a truck service and parts center.
*************************
Overview
The A & B Inc. utilizes the "Jurisdiction of Organization" as the Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii according to the UCC Financing Statement filed by "The Kingdom of Hawaii Ministry Trust" under Doc No(s) 2007-192179 dated October 31, 2007
The A & B Inc. is a Sham, identity thief set up aligned with the State of Hawaii which evolved from the Territory of Hawaii created the the Army, Navy, and Federal officials.
The difference of this set up is that the UCC/Uniform Commercial Corporation supported by the Federal Reserves was allowed in using another jurisdiction contrary to American Jurisdiction.
The move to Pirate, Pillage, create and promote fraud, racketeering is seen here.
The Corporation created by Alexander and Baldwin were entitled to only Fee Simple or Lease lands and are Not the true Alodio/Ano Alodio owners.
Alexander and Baldwin were listed in the Judicial Tribunal list utilizing Article XIV of the 1849/1850 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America.
See the following 1851 Speech by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli who documented that he ratified the 1849/ 1850 Treaty in 1850.
Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli also made it clear that Alodio/Ano Alodio deeds were to his people, kanaka maoli and to aliens they were allowed Fee Simple only.
Alexander & Baldwin which began a Corporation were Aliens and cannot own Alodio/Ano Alodio lands. Therefore, they are Not the Superior title owners of the 87,000 + acres that they have written about.
They are documented Pirates, Pillagers as documented in
Application of the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America: Some Evidence documented
Application of the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America: Some Evidence Documented
- A Review -
Compiled by Amelia Gora (2016)
The Kingdom of Hawaii was wrongfully, criminally plundered upon by a Nation who did treaty with our Sovereign, Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli who set up the Alodio/Ano Alodio System for his heirs and his people. To Aliens/foreigners he allowed a Fee Simple. Furthermore, he did not wish for foreigners to own his private lands.
"The Court ruled in favor of the British plaintiff, holding that the treaty removed any bar to recovery created by Virginia law. Justice Cushing wrote that under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty “overrules all State laws upon the subject.”33 The other Justices agreed on this point,34 including Justice Iredell, who dissented on other grounds.35 Although Marshall argued eloquently on behalf of the losing defendants,36 he never challenged the consensus view that under the Supremacy Clause, the treaty displaced any state law inconsistent with U.S. treaty obligations."
"The Court held that judicial action was the appropriate means to implement the treaty because the combination of the treaty and the Supremacy Clause obligated state courts to “execute” the U.S. treaty obligation by ordering American debtors to pay their debts to British creditors."
" Marshall’s speech set forth his views about the allocation of constitutional responsibility for treaty implementation among the three branches of the federal government.52 In brief, Marshall believed that all government officers have a duty to execute treaties, insofar as they can do so by acting within the scope of authority granted under domestic law."
Marshall explained this position as follows: “[The President] is charged to execute the laws. A treaty is declared to be a law. He must then execute a treaty, where he . . . possesses the means of executing it.”60 Since Article 27 had the force of law under the Supremacy Clause, and the President had a duty under Article II to execute the law, the President had a duty to execute Article 27, at least in cases where Congress had not specified some other mechanism for treaty implementation.
"Republicans also argued that Article 27 required judicial, not executive implementation.61 In response, Marshall emphasized the distinction between a case “carried before a court as an individual claim” and a case “brought before the Executive as a national demand.”62 The Robbins case was “in its nature a national demand made upon the nation. The parties were the two nations. They cannot come into court to litigate their claims, nor can a court
decide on them. Of consequence, the demand is not a case for judicial cognizance.”63 A treaty-related claim falls within the scope of judicial competence where parties “come into court, who can be reached by its process, and bound by its power . . . to which they are bound to submit.”64 Since the real parties in interest in the Robbins case were two sovereign powers, and they were not bound to submit to judicial authority, the case fell outside the scope of judicial competence."
"B. Application of the Two-Step Approach in Foster and Percheman In Foster v. Neilson, 90 Marshall penned the following words, which have come to be associated with the doctrine of non-self-executing treaties: Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department; and the legislature must execute the contract before it can become a rule for the Court.91"
"Executory treaty provisions require the nation to undertake affirmative steps to fulfill its treaty commitments, whereas executed treaty provisions “require no further act to be done.”114"
"The Clause specifies that “all Treaties” are “the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”173 Read literally, the text seems to say that all treaties are directly binding on state governments. This interpretation is broadly consistent with the original understanding of the Supremacy Clause. Although commentators disagree about the original understanding, they generally agree that the Framers included treaties in the Supremacy Clause to make treaties binding on state government officers under domestic law.174 There are two problems, though, with a literal interpretation of the Supremacy Clause. First, the Constitution prohibits federal lawmakers from “commandeering” state legislatures or state executive officers.175"
"It is well established that “a State must afford to all individuals a meaningful opportunity to be heard if it is to fulfill the promise of the Due Process Clause.”208 Writing for the Court in 1876, Justice Field expressed the principle as follows: Wherever one is assailed in his person or his property, there he may defend, for the liability and the right are inseparable. This is a principle of natural justice, recognized as such by the common intelligence and conscience of all nations. A sentence of a court pronounced against a party without hearing him, or giving him an opportunity to be heard, is not a judicial determination of his rights, and is not entitled to respect in any other tribunal.209"
" Absent action by the federal political branches, though, the Supreme Court has a duty to apply the Supremacy Clause as written. Under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty is binding on state government officers if the treaty imposes non-discretionary duties on the United States under international law, state officers have the capacity to promote or hinder treaty performance, and application of treaty duties to state officers would not violate the anti-commandeering rule. The Clause applies both to treaties that delegate decisionmaking authority to international tribunals and those that do not. Whether, and in what circumstances, a treaty is judicially enforceable against state officers is a separate issue. This article does not analyze the myriad issues associated with judicial enforcement of treaties that are binding on state government officers under domestic law. However, the article does identify a narrow set of cases in which the Due Process Clause mandates judicial enforcement of treaties. When the state threatens to impose criminal sanctions on someone, and that person claims the sanction would violate a treaty-based, non-discretionary duty, the Due Process Clause requires a judicial hearing on the merits, provided the individual raises the argument at the first available opportunity in accordance with established procedural rules. State and federal judicial decisions in Medellin probably violated the petitioner’s constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause."
Reference: http://www.harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/HLI103.pdf
REVIEW
The Supreme Court is mandated "to apply the Supremacy Clause as written" in all court cases in the Hawaiian Islands.
"Absent action by the federal political branches, though, the Supreme Court has a duty to apply the Supremacy Clause as written. Under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty is binding on state government officers if the treaty imposes non-discretionary duties on the United States under international law, state officers have the capacity to promote or hinder treaty performance, and application of treaty duties to state officers would not violate the anti-commandeering rule. The Clause applies both to treaties that delegate decisionmaking authority to international tribunals and those that do not. Whether, and in what circumstances, a treaty is judicially enforceable against state officers is a separate issue. This article does not analyze the myriad issues associated with judicial enforcement of treaties that are binding on state government officers under domestic law. However, the article does identify a narrow set of cases in which the Due Process Clause mandates judicial enforcement of treaties. When the state threatens to impose criminal sanctions on someone, and that person claims the sanction would violate a treaty-based, non-discretionary duty, the Due Process Clause requires a judicial hearing on the merits, provided the individual raises the argument at the first available opportunity in accordance with established procedural rules. State and federal judicial decisions in Medellin probably violated the petitioner’s constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause."
The Courts, etc. from an Identity Theft basis/Sham set-up/a Non-government entity
Because the United States did premeditate the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, set up the Territory disregarding the Opposition to Annexation of Queen Liliuokalani and her subjects numbering 40,000, and with the aid of the Army, Navy, and Federal officials developed the Territory and falsely claimed that the the "Territory was the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii", the United States violated the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and the the Supremacy Clause, violated their own citizens when they signed the illegal banker's Constitution, created a two government system called the United States, and the American Empire, instead of the United States of America, looted, pirated a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation and utilized monies, lands, assets, mineral rights, etc. for the purpose of Wars with other innocent nations...........the U.S., the bankers in the Hawaiian Islands needs to take their identity thieves, their pirates, current pirate operatives including the governor, judges, United States Minister of Interior, gun carrying Police officers, Sheriffs, Department of Land and Natural Resources officers, et. als. with them according to the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America.
Injuries were made on all non-treasonous kanaka maoli, Hawaii's Royal Families, and innocent subjects of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Injuries includes genocide activities, the deliberate incarceration of land owners on Kalaupapa, leper colonies, introducing small pox into the populations, etc.
Alodio/Ano Alodio, Superior titles to lands are held by those kanaka maoli documented in the Mahele books, validated by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1848. Aliens were given Fee Simple/less than alodio/life interest only.
The United States of America paid for Fee Simple conveyances by those who had only Fee Simple titles or had no titles to convey.
The United States of America/United States/American Empire must pay rents, remove toxic containers such as the fuel storage buildings, etc. in Halawa Valley, Oahu, removal of depleted uranium materials, missiles, etc stored and used at Pohakuloa, Hawaii, Schofield Barracks, Wahiawa,Oahu, etc. and eventually face the Tribunals for all Nations who were wrongfully plundered upon through the funds gotten from the pirating of assets of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation for the purposes of Wars/Business of Wars.
The above is additional supporting evidence which is added to the following:
Karen Hudes - The Bank Of Hawaii Holds 170,000 Tons Of Gold
World Bank Whistleblower makes Startling Confession Karen Hudes
Karen Hudes - World Bank in Collusion with the Jesuits.
18:46
No Treaty- No Law- No Land
Ohikilolo 00015
The Sovereignty Conversations Na Maka, Williamson Chang
50th State Fraud - A Visit With Williamson Chang
Aloha ʻĀina Speaker Series: Hawaiian Independence & Governance ...
Tribunal 001
Note: Wikileaks was used as a reference in the above article but the reference is actually Wikipedia ....oops, my mistake.......
Wikileaks is in the news which is why I've referred to that website....the Whistleblowers must have much information about the criminal collusion of the United States and the identity theft created using the Kingdom of Hawaii and claiming to be the successor, and even the Sov./ Sovereign Kingdom of Hawaii setup documented in 2007.
EXPOSING THE FRAUDS OF IDENTITY THIEVES IN THE
Kingdom of Hawaii
by Amelia Gora (2016)
The following Chronological listing shows the frauds, the criminal evidence documented by those utilizing the identity thieving of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation known as the Kingdom of Hawaii/ Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/ Hawaii:
1883 - Ruth Keelikolani died. She was one of the heirs of Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha who was one of the heirs of his father, sister, et. als. - Mataio Kekuanaoa who was the heir of his daughter Victoria Kamamalu.
Note: Ruth Keelikolani's heir was her cousin, hanai/adopted sister Bernice Pauahi Bishop.
Ruth's Power of Attorney was Kalaikini (w), last wife of Ruth's stepbrother named John Kapena who was also the first of the four Supreme Court Judges of the Kingdom of Hawaii appointed by his son-in-law Kamehameha III- Kauikeaouli who married his daughter Kekualoa/Kekua (w). Her brother was Keawe who married Peke Davis, daughter of Isaac Davis and Kamaikui, daughter of John Young/Olohana.
Kalaikini (w) married one of Kamehameha III's children named Opunui. Opunui was the hanai/adopted son of Keawe who also married Pauahi (w).
Charles Reed Bishop became Ruth's Power of Attorney.
Bernice Pauahi Bishop was not the only Alodio/Ano Alodio owner.
1884 - Bernice Pauahi Bishop died. Her next of kin on Probate was Kalola (w) - our ancestor, and life interest to Charles Reed Bishop, banker, lawyer, Trustee for William Lee, et. als.
Note: Bernice Pauahi Bishop was criminally claimed to be the "last of the Kamehameha's", a lie started by Pirate of the Pacific Charles Reed Bishop and Friends - Sanford B. Dole, et. als. The Trustees of Bernice Pauahi Bishop claimed to be the owners under the Will of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, and held ano alodio lands. The Trustees were not related to the Ano Alodio/Alodio lands title owner nor were they the heirs and successors of Kamehameha, and could only use Fee Simple, less than Alodio claims.
Bernice Pauahi Bishop's heirs included other Kamehameha's/other relatives such as Kalola (w) whose father was the brother of Abner Paki married to Konia.
The Trustees were Aliens who could only claim a less than Alodio fee simple title, a life interest title.
Other issues include the fact that Charles Reed Bishop's family were placed as heirs to the Trusts such as Bernice Pauahi Dunham, ancestor of current U.S. President Obama.
Queen Liliuokalani was the hanai/adopted daughter of Abner Paki and Konia (w). She along with many others were defrauded by Pirates of the Pacific Charles Reed Bishop and Friends.
1893 - Premeditation to take over the Kingdom of Hawaii documented. Queen Liliuokalani was wrongfully dethroned by Aliens, those who could only own Fee Simple, less than Alodio titles, their helpers included others who were paid off supporters who accepted $50 - $500 for their services. They were documented treasonous persons.
1897 - Opposition to Annexation was made by Queen Liliuokalani and her 40,000 (approximately) subjects.
1899 - The United States of America became two (2) nations: The United States and the American Empire.
Reference: Peacock vs. Republic of Hawaii case (1899), HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Supreme Court Law Library/Main Library/Archives, Honolulu, Oahu
1900 - the Army, Navy, and Federal officials helped to develop the Territory of Hawaii.
1912 - The Territory claimed to be the "successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii" see PA PELEKANE case (1912), Volume 21, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, at the Supreme Court Law Library/Main Library/Archives, Honolulu, Oahu.
1915 - Queen Liliuokalani was put on the throne for a day to recognize the Pan Pacific Flag Day and made to sign illegal contracts, etc.
Note: The Pan Pacific group became the Hawaii Tourism Authority for money making ventures by the usurpers.
1917 - Queen Liliuokalani died. She maintained that she did not sign a Trust Deed with the usurpers - Samuel Damon, Curtis Iaukea et. als.
1918 - The Pan Pacific group allowed themselves to purchase lands in the Hawaiian Islands.
Note: Aliens could not own Alodio lands in the Hawaiian Islands as documented by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli. He did Not want foreigners to live on his personal lands.
1929 - The Alodio Deeds and the Fee Simple Deeds were merged and documented to be "an Alodio title in Fee Simple" by Land Commissioner Bailey, a former Judge in his introduction of the INDICES OF AWARDS showing the Mahele Deeds of the Kingdom of Hawaii.
1952 - The UCC/Uniform Commercial Code was put in place by the Federal Reserves.
1959 - U.S. President Eisenhower signed an Executive Order making the Territory of Hawaii a State.
Oppositions were documented by Harold Abel Cathcart one of Kamehameha's descendants and heirs.
1980 - OHA/Office of the Hawaiian Affairs created.
1993 - Public Law 103-150 was signed by U.S. President William Clinton apologizing for the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani. It was an Admission of crimes by the United States for the criminal takeover of a neutral, friendly nation.
Note: Legal Notice posted stating that the Apology was Not accepted.
1996 - Affidavit/Lien filed (281 pages) No. 96-177455 filed on 12/17/96 with genealogies, history, laws, evidence of frauds including former Governor Poindexter who utilized Lot Kamehameha's signature - he became Kamehameha V - who signed an open ended document allowing the sugar companies to use Crown lands, water rights, etc.
Note. CW Ashford, Attorney General, claimed that the document was legal and approved it more than 50 years After the death of Kamehameha V.
Fraud, piracy, pillaging, racketeering documented.
2001 article showing the Overview of A & B, Inc., part owner KSBE/Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates, Queen Emma Trust, Queen Liliuokalani Trust etc. at the following link:
Landlocked | Hawaii Business Magazine
2007 - Alexander & Baldwin which is owned in part by Kamehameha Schools/KSBE/ Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates formed the A&B, Inc. which utilizes the "Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii" as the "Jurisdiction of Organization" in the UCC Financing Statement with Doc No 2007-192179 filed on October 31, 2007 initially filed on 10/29/2007 6:46 PM. (Note Time - after work hour ending at normally 4:30 PM!)
2008 - The Royal Families, part of Bernice Pauahi Bishop's Family with Alodio/Ano Alodio Titles met and reformed the House of Nobles - Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/ He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaii.
Various members were elected into positions:
Also, as the Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, I did null and void that illegal contract, along with other illegal contracts such as Hawaiian Homes, etc.
The illegal State of Hawaii sued our families in court over the Crown Lands.
Reminder: There's No Statutes of Limitations when it comes to FRAUD.
Research incomplete.
Informing many because..............
Something STINKS...............(.and I know it's NOT ME) WICKED TO THE MAX!
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxVaIEaVioE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzcv5TJkJBA Fifteen Men (Bottle of Rum)
Amelia Gora
http://maoliworld.ning.com/…/pirates-alexander-baldwin-and-… Breaking News: A U.S. Corporation identity thieves the Kingdom of Hawaii .....the Territory turned State did it in 1900 as "the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii" and in 2007 the corporation claims to be the "Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii" --- Terrorists are they Not? All you Sovereign activists as well as those opposing the One World Order, etc. suggest everyone look into this.............EVIL, beyond EVIL.....
Background:
Alexander & Baldwin
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. is an American company that was once part of theBig Five companies in territorial Hawaii. The company today operates businesses in real estate, sugarcane, and diversified agriculture. It is also the only "Big Five" company that still cultivates sugarcane. It remains one of theState of Hawaii's largest private landowners, owning over 87,000 acres (35,000 ha) throughout the state. In addition, the company owns 47 income properties in the Hawaii and the continental United States.
Alexander & Baldwin has its headquarters in downtown Honolulu at the Alexander & Baldwin Building, which was built in 1929. The Alexander & Baldwin Sugar Museum exhibits some of sugarcane company's history.
Contents
[hide]History[edit]
Before Annexation[edit]
In 1831, Dwight Baldwin (1798–1886) and Charlotte Fowler Baldwin were sent by the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM) as medical missionaries to the Sandwich Islands, as the Hawaiian Islands were called at the time. Reverend William Alexander and Mary McKinney Alexander arrived the following year in 1832.
Alexander & Baldwin was founded by their sons Samuel Thomas Alexander and Henry Perrine Baldwin (1842–1911) as Samuel T Alexander & Co., in 1870. The two purchased 561 acres (227 ha) of land on the island of Maui between Pāʻia andMakawao, on which they began to cultivate sugarcane.
The land the partners cultivated was semi-arid former dry forest, not ideal for growing sugarcane, a crop that required much water. Samuel Alexander realized that rain was plentiful miles away in the rainforests on the windward slopes ofHaleakalā mountain. Thus, he designed a 17-mile (27 km) long irrigation aqueduct that diverted water from that part of Haleakalā to their plantation. Work started on the aqueduct in 1876 and was completed two years later in 1878.
After completion of the aqueduct, the company grew and was eventually renamed Alexander & Baldwin Plantation. Between 1872 and 1900, the company gradually took over more land and sugar mill operations. In 1898, Alexander and Baldwin purchased a controlling interest in one of its rival companies, Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company (HC&S) from Claus Spreckles.[2] By 1899, the company had bought out Maui’s two main railroad lines (Kahului Railroad Company and Maui Railroad & Steamship Company). In 1900, the company incorporated and was renamed Alexander & Baldwin, Ltd.
The Big Five Era[edit]
Following incorporation, the company continued to prosper. It came to be one of Hawaii’s Big Five companies which held a virtual oligarchy over Hawaii’s economy during the region’s territorial years. In this period, the company entered many new businesses and controlled more than 100,000 acres (40,000 ha) of land in the Territory.
In 1905, Alexander & Baldwin and other Big Five companies took control of the California and Hawaiian Sugar Company (C&H), giving Alexander & Baldwin a factory where they could refine its sugar.
Over the following decades, the company opened or bought out sugar operations at Puʻunene, Kahuku, and Kauaʻi islandas well as pineapple operations on Maui and Kauaʻi. In 1908, the company bought a portion of the Matson Navigation Company, a major shipping line operating in the territory. The company sold its sugar interests on Kauaʻi and consolidated all of its Maui operations into an enlarged Hawaii Commercial & Sugar Company in the 1930s while continuing its pineapple operations as well as its sugarcane plantation in Kahuku until the 1960s.
Following World War II, the company entered a new business: land development and real estate. The company formed a new subsidiary, the Kahului Development Co., to develop housing in the Kahului area. In the following years, the company became more involved in the development of its land and the Kahului Development Co. became A&B Properties, Inc.
In 1962, the company purchased all outstanding interests in the Hawaii Commercial & Sugar Company and the sugar operation became wholly owned by Alexander & Baldwin. In 1964, the company also bought out the interests in Matson Navigation Company held by three of its fellow "Big Five" competitors:American Factors, C. Brewer & Co., and Castle & Cooke. In 1969, the company purchased all remaining, outstanding shares in Matson and the shipping company became a wholly owned subsidiary of Alexander & Baldwin.
Diversification[edit]
In recent decades, the company’s development and real estate division has grown as A&B Properties developed new residential and commercial projects on other land the company owned. In addition, Alexander & Baldwin entered diversified agriculture, beginning to cultivate coffee and macadamia nuts in the 1980s.
Matson Spinoff[edit]
As of June 2012 Matson Shipping in which the company had held an investment for 140 years was spun off as a separate company. [4][5]
Criticism[edit]
Alexander & Baldwin has drawn repeated criticism from Maui residents over the use of pre-harvest field burning by its subsidiary Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company. HC&S cultivates approximately 35,000 acres of sugarcane on Maui, with roughly 400 acres per week being burned from March to November each year to remove dried leaves from the cane before it is harvested and processed.[6] A spokesman for HC&S claimed that "burning, in the field, is the only economical means HC&S has found to-date of removing the dried leafy material from its crop."[7] Maui environmentalists and physicians have countered by asserting that the burning process has caused increased rates of asthma and respiratory disease, especially among children, released carcinogens from burning PVC pipes used in the irrigation system,[6] and resulted in highway closures and car crashes.[8][9]Community organizers have called on A&B to replace burning with green harvesting methods,[10] and in 2012, presented the Hawaii Department of Health with a petition signed by 8,700 Maui residents, asking it to deny the company a burning permit for the coming year.[11]
The company's Puunene Mill has also attracted criticism from residents, who have pointed out that its equipment does not meet federal emissions standards and that its high coal consumption produces unsafe levels of sulfur dioxide.[12]
Some activists have reported receiving threats from or being assaulted by HC&S employees and members of theInternational Longshore and Warehouse Union, which has been active in lobbying for continued cane burning on behalf of Alexander & Baldwin.[6][9]
The company's agricultural practices, as well as its history and the careers of its missionary founders, were satirized by Maui author Tim Parise in the novel Totum Hominem.[13]
List of businesses owned by Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.[edit]
Jul 29, 1:15 PM EDT - Disclaimer
Finance
Skip to contentFinance Data Listing and Disclaimers
Exchanges
Mutual Funds
Indexes
Bonds
Currencies
Disclaimers
Data is provided by financial exchanges and may be delayed as specified by financial exchanges or our data providers. Google does not verify any data and disclaims any obligation to do so.
Google, its data or content providers, the financial exchanges and each of their affiliates and business partners (A) expressly disclaim the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any data and (B) shall not be liable for any errors, omissions or other defects in, delays or interruptions in such data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Neither Google nor any of our information providers will be liable for any damages relating to your use of the information provided herein. As used here, “business partners” does not refer to an agency, partnership, or joint venture relationship between Google and any such parties.
You agree not to copy, modify, reformat, download, store, reproduce, reprocess, transmit or redistribute any data or information found herein or use any such data or information in a commercial enterprise without obtaining prior written consent. All data and information is provided “as is” for personal informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes or advice. Please consult your broker or financial representative to verify pricing before executing any trade.
Either Google or its third party data or content providers have exclusive proprietary rights in the data and information provided.
Please find all listed exchanges and indices covered by Google along with their respective time delays from the table on the left.
Advertisements presented on Google Finance are solely the responsibility of the party from whom the ad originates. Neither Google nor any of its data licensors endorses or is responsible for the content of any advertisement or any goods or services offered therein.
Currency Conversion
Google cannot guarantee the accuracy of the exchange rates displayed. You should confirm current rates before making any transactions that could be affected by changes in the exchange rates.
NYSE Securities
NYSE, NYSE Arca LLC, and NYSE MKT LLC reserve all rights to the securities information that Google Inc. makes available to you. You understand and acknowledge that such securities information does not reflect trading activity on markets other than NYSE, NYSE Arca, or NYSE MKT, as applicable, and are intended to provide you with a reference point only, rather than as a basis for making trading decisions. None of Google Inc. NYSE, NYSE Arca LLC, and NYSE MKT LLC guarantee such information nor shall any of them be liable for any loss due either to their negligence or to any cause beyond their reasonable control. Any redistribution of such information is strictly prohibited.
Another Subsidiary - this one utilizes the " Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii " Jurisdiction under UCC/ Uniform Commercial Code.
Note: The UCC/ Uniform Commercial Code is an American setup....
Uniform Commercial Code
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), first published in 1952, is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated with the goal of harmonizing the law ofsales and other commercial transactions across the United States of America (U.S.) through UCC adoption by all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S.territories.
While largely successful at achieving this ambitious goal, some U.S. jurisdictions (e.g., Louisiana and Puerto Rico) have not adopted all of the articles contained in the UCC, while other U.S. jurisdictions (e.g., American Samoa) have not adopted any articles in the UCC. Also, adoption of the UCC often varies, although to different degrees, from one U.S. jurisdiction to another. Sometimes this variation is due to alternative language found in the official UCC itself. At other times, adoption of different revisions to the official UCC contributes to further variation. Additionally, some jurisdictions deviate from the official UCC by tailoring the language to meet their unique needs and preferences. Lastly, even identical language adopted by any two U.S. jurisdictions may nonetheless be subject to different statutory interpretationby each jurisdiction's courts.
Note: the last words in the above "each jurisdiction's courts"......so A & B Inc utilizes the Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii, then it means the identity thieves, the SHAM setup also has a SHAM, identity thief court called the Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii....a SHAM set up, is it not?
A & B Properties, Inc
http://www.abprop.com
Development
Building Communities
We focus on developments utilizing historic, acquired and joint venture land that reflect our island heritage and embrace contemporary Hawaii.
The Link Between Land & Shareholder Value
How A&B Properties Targets Its Investments
We are active real estate developers, commercial property owners and land stewards. Our ability to grow our portfolio is a reflection of our market knowledge, disciplined underwriting approach, and opportunistic mindset.
Commercial Portfolio
Retail, Office and Industrial
Our diversified commercial portfolio in Hawaii and mainland states reflects A&B Properties' investment strategy of acquiring and managing high-quality retail, office and industrial properties in key markets.
Land Stewards
Responsibility & Commitment
We undertake a comprehensive program of land stewardship, planning, entitlement and development to enhance the value of the Company's lands, in keeping with community needs.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next