OBSERVATION from Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Kingdom of another Nation, the U.S.: DRASTIC CHANGES ON AMERICAN Constitutions FROM 2006 to PRESENT Time With Foreign KENYAN BORN OBAMA In Place
Proclamation by the President:
Bush - Constitution 'Just A Goddamned Piece Of Paper'
rense.com/general69/paper.htm... leaders filed into the Oval Office to meet with President George W. Bush and talk ...of the United States called the Constitution "a goddamned piece of paper.Bush: The Constitution a 'Goddamned Piece of Paper'?
Dec 12, 2007 – Bush: The Constitution a 'Goddamned Piece of Paper'? ... He said he finds their account credible: "Sometimes I just have to go with my gut, .... at 1:02 pm Filed under Ask FactCheck. tagged with constitution, George W. Bush."The Constitution is just a piece of paper" - G.W. Bush - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbEMay 11, 2006 - 6 min - Uploaded by alephomega
"The Constitution is just a piece of paper" - G.W. Bush ... never have been possible without W Bush and his ...G.W. Bush on Constitution - snopes.com
message.snopes.com › Urban Legends › Questionable Quotes8 posts - 4 authors - Jan 28, 2007G.W. Bush on Constitution Questionable Quotes. ... a god damn, I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way. Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it'sjust a god damn piece of paper!" George W. Bush ...U.S. Constitution is just a piece of paper
whitehouser.com/politics/bush-constitution-just-a-piece-of-paper/Jul 21, 2007 – the President of the United States – George W. Bush. YouTube Preview... the Constitution is just “a god-damned piece of paper!” tags:Bush ...
National
Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2008.
WASHINGTON -- On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we recognize that each life has inherent dignity and matchless value, and we reaffirm our steadfast determination to defend the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society.
America was founded on the belief that all men are created equal and have an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and our country remains committed to upholding that founding principle. Since taking office, I have signed legislation to help protect life at all stages, and my Administration will continue to encourage adoption, fund abstinence education and crisis pregnancy programs, and support faith-based groups. Today, as our society searches for new ways to ease human suffering, we must pursue the possibilities of science in a manner that respects the sacred gift of life and upholds our moral values.
Our Nation has made progress in its efforts to protect human life, and we will strive to change hearts and minds with compassion and decency. On National Sanctity of Human Life Day and throughout the year, we help strengthen the culture of life in America and work for the day when every child is welcomed in life and protected in law.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Sunday, January 20, 2008, as National Sanctity of Human Life Day. I call upon all Americans to recognize this day with appropriate ceremonies and to underscore our commitment to respecting and protecting the life and dignity of every human being.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second.
GEORGE W. BUSH
Supreme Court Declares President Obama's Health Care Reform ...
Supreme Court Declares President Obama's Health Care Reform Law Constitutional. by Noah Rothman | 10:17 am, June 28th, 2012. » 690 comments ...Obama v. the Constitution - Stephanie Hessler - [page]
townhall.com/columnists/.../2012/06/15/obama...constitution/.../full/Jun 15, 2012 – A look at President Obama's first term shows his repeated disregard for the Constitution that he has sworn to preserve, protect, and defend.News for president obama and the constitution
- Top 10 reasons not to re-elect Obama (part 3 of 3)
Human Events - 8 hours agoWhat should be of grave concern to every American citizen is that President Obamahas described the Constitution as “an imperfect document ...
- PolicyMic - 3 hours ago
President Obama's top 10 constitutional violations | The Daily Caller
dailycaller.com/.../president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations/Dec 4, 2011 – Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. Before joining ...Executive Overreach - By John Yoo - The Corner - National Review ...
Jun 15, 2012 – John Yoo writes on NRO: President Obama's claim that he can refuse to ... the unprecedented stretching of the Constitution and the rule of law.OBAMA TO WRITE NEW U.S. CONSTITUTION | Weekly World News
weeklyworldnews.com/politics/.../obama-to-write-new-u-s-constitutio...Feb 22, 2012 – President Barack Obama told reporters last night that the U.S.Constitution has become a hindrance to progress in America. “The document is ...
**********************
Get Ilya Shapiro Feed
One of the biggest political changes that 2011 brought — in large part due to the tea parties and their effect on the 2010 election — is the centrality of the Constitution to our public discourse. Lawmakers and citizens no longer consider simply whether a given bill or policy proposal is a good idea but whether it is constitutional. “Where does the government get the power to do that?” is often critics’ rallying cry.
That’s a healthy development. For far too long, even in those rare moments when politicians were faced with constitutional concerns, they’ve had the attitude Nancy Pelosi did when asked about the authority for Obamacare’s individual mandate: “Are you serious?” Because, of course, constitutional arguments are the last refuge of the scoundrel who has no good policy arguments to make or political power to levy.
And so it’s a good thing that Americans are taking their founding document seriously. After all, the Constitution is the font of all federal power. Its carefully crafted structural provisions that we learned about in grade school, such as the separation of powers and checks and balances, are not merely an application of political theory.
“Federalism is more than an exercise in setting the boundary between different institutions of government for their own integrity,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court earlier this year. “By denying any one government complete jurisdiction over all the concerns of public life,” Kennedy continued, “federalism protects the liberty of the individual from arbitrary power.” If the federal government acts outside the scope of its delegated and carefully enumerated powers, then it’s no better than an armed mob.
The Obama administration and its allies in Congress have perpetrated more than their share of such mob-like actions. While it’s hard to narrow them down, here’s my stab at the government’s top 10 constitutional violations since President Obama took office.
1. The individual mandate
No list of President Obama’s constitutional violations would be complete without including the requirement that every American purchase health insurance, on penalty of civil fine. The individual mandate is unprecedented and exceeds Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce. If it is allowed to stand, Congress will be able to impose any kind of economic mandate as part of any kind of national regulatory scheme. Fortunately, the Supreme Court has a chance to strike this down during its current term.
2. Medicaid coercion
The Court will also be taking up Obamacare’s massive intrusion on federal-state relations in the form of a coercive Medicaid expansion. The law compels states to drastically increase their Medicaid expenditures and reorganize their health care bureaucracies, on penalty of losing all (not just additional) Medicaid funds. No state contemplated such a program when it signed onto Medicaid — Arizona was the last to join, in 1982 — and now no state can afford to withdraw. Indeed, even if some withdrawal mechanism existed, withdrawn states’ taxpayers would still be funding complying states’ Medicaid programs. As the Supreme Court held in South Dakota v. Dole, there comes a point when “the financial inducement offered by Congress might be so coercive as to pass the point at which pressure turns into compulsion.”
3. The Independent Payment Advisory Board (a.k.a. “The Death Panel”)
IPAB is the group of 15 presidential appointees who, beginning in 2014, are tasked with reducing Medicare spending. Any decisions IPAB makes automatically become law that can only be overridden by a three-fifths majority vote in the Senate. Unlike other federal agencies, IPAB is subject to no external review — no public notification in advance of proposed rules or opportunity for comment, no administrative guidelines and no judicial review. Medicare comprises about 13 percent of the federal budget, so that’s an awesome amount of power for Congress to delegate to unelected executive-branch bureaucrats. Indeed, it’s so basic a violation of traditional separation of powers that there’s no historical analog. The Goldwater Institute has filed a strong lawsuit challenging this (yet another) unprecedented aspect of Obamacare, which will continue wending its way through the lower courts regardless of how the Supreme Court rules on the individual mandate and Medicaid-coercion issues.
4. The Chrysler bailout
Building on the Bush administration’s illegal use of TARP funds to bail out the auto industry, the Obama administration bullied Chrysler’s secured creditors — who were entitled to “absolute priority” — into accepting 30 cents on the dollar, while junior creditors such as labor unions received much more. This subversion of creditor rights violates not just bankruptcy law but also the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses. This blatant crony capitalism — government-directed industrial policy to help political insiders — discourages investors and generally undermines confidence in American rule of law.
5. Dodd-Frank
Intended to remedy weaknesses in the U.S. financial system — ensuring transparency and accountability — the Dodd-Frank financial “reform” empowered unlimited, unreviewable and often secret bureaucratic discretion. The administrative bodies the legislation created face no constraints on the exercise of arbitrary authority. For example, the Treasury Department now has broad and essentially unchecked power to seize banks and other financial entities that it determines are unsound but “too big to fail.” The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Financial Stability Oversight Council, meanwhile, craft, execute and interpret their own law. Due process and separation of powers issues abound.
6. The deep-water drilling ban
Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the Interior Department issued a blanket six-month moratorium on new oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. A federal judge struck down that moratorium as arbitrary and capricious, but the government issued a new order to replace the one that was struck down. That order was subsequently withdrawn, but the judge was so shocked by the administration’s conduct that he found the government in civil contempt of court.
7. Political-speech disclosure for federal contractors
In April of this year, President Obama released a draft executive order (still pending) that would require businesses with federal contracts to disclose independent expenditures on federal elections (political speech independent of candidates and parties). This order is intended to undermine the Supreme Court’s Citizen United decision — allowing independent expenditures by corporations, unions and other associations — by discouraging federal contractors and their executives from engaging in political speech. Citizens United held that such expenditures do not enable the kind of quid pro quo corruption that campaign finance laws are allowed to regulate, so this draft executive order shows contempt for the First Amendment by chilling protected speech.
8. Taxing political contributions
Earlier this year, the IRS tried to muzzle political speech by asserting that donations to certain nonprofit advocacy groups (so-called 501(c)(4) organizations) would be subject to the gift tax. Historically, the IRS has not applied the gift tax in this way — donations to advocacy groups are not likely to be used to circumvent the estate tax — and when the IRS previously tried to tax political donations, it was rebuffed by the courts on the grounds that such transfers are not gifts (i.e., the donor is getting something in return). The IRS has since backed down, but the suspicion remains that it was trying to chill the political speech of those opposed to President Obama’s policies, in violation of the First Amendment.
9. Graphic tobacco warnings
Late last year, the FDA issued regulations requiring cigarette manufacturers to display graphic warnings on all packs of cigarettes that must cover at least 50% of the packaging and graphically portray tobacco-related illnesses. These warnings violate the First Amendment because the government is compelling the cigarette manufacturers to discourage their customers from buying their lawful products. Last month, a federal judge blocked the new regulation, which was due to go into effect in January, but the administration is appealing.
10. Health care waivers
The Department of Health and Human Services has granted nearly 2,000 waivers to employers seeking relief from Obamacare’s onerous regulations. Nearly 20 percent of these waivers went to gourmet restaurants and other businesses in Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco district. Nevada, home to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, got a blanket waiver, while Republican-controlled states like Indiana and Louisiana were denied. Even beyond the unseemly political favoritism, such arbitrary dispensations violate a host of constitutional and administrative law provisions ranging from equal protection to the “intelligible principle” required for congressional delegation of authority to cabinet agencies. Unlike 17th-century English monarchs, American presidents were not granted dispensing powers: As we’ve seen, the power to suspend a legal requirement can and will be used to arbitrarily favor the politically connected. Moreover, most of these waivers were never authorized by Congress in the first place!
Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/04/president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations/#ixzz24rfinN5G
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/04/president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations/#ixzz24rfSL400
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/04/president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations/#ixzz24rfDA7D3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQP563gKwIU
AMERICANS...........TAKE BACK YOUR GOVERNMENT...............protect safety and happiness... for Corporations?
the Evolution from the Constitution for the People appears to have been replaced with "Corporations" instead...............
The people, therefore, are under stress, duress, usurpation, coercion, intimidation, threat, genocide - the same issues experienced by the Royal Family(ies)-the true ones, the Kanaka Maoli with the Genocide Issues added - by a Foreign KENYAN born President ...........
only to be replaced with a billionaire CEO/Corporate Executive Officer providing support to Corporations............?
Will the people vote in the ALI BABA & THE FORTY THIEVES, BONNIE & CLYDES, the AL CAPONES, the HITLERS, the MUSSOLINIS, the STALINS .....
Where's the LONE RANGER & TONTO, the BATMAN AND ROBBIN, the SPIDERMAN, the SUPERMAN, BEANIE & CECILS, the MIGHTY MOUSES, the MAHATMA GANDHIS, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, MARTIN LUTHER KING, JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY types?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f29_mQI9K6U
(Why is it that more good guys are remembered?)
So, Who Will Be the NEW GUY who will properly represent the people? and will properly respect the fact that the Perpetual Treaty(ies) are in place because Kamehameha's family(ies) existed in 1893 and their descendants/heirs exists today knowing full well that the State of Hawaii belongs under the American Consulate..........
This message is being forwarded to many.......
aloha from Amelia Gora, a Royal person, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/ Hawaiian Kingdom recognizing the Perpetual Treaty(ies) in Place which supercedes State Laws, etc.
Replies