Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
BirtherReport.com Leads to Arrest of Obot who Threatened to Kill Sheriff Joe ArpaioFriday, January 27, 2012 7:07 PMBirtherReport.com/ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com Leads to Arrest of an Obot who Threatened to Kill Sheriff Joe for his Investigation into Obama's Eligibility
Back in October of 2011 an Obot left numerous comments at this blog threatening to kill various people that have pursued Obama's ineligibility to be president. One comment was directed at Sheriff Joe and his family where the commenter posted the following:
"I plan to kill Joe Arpaio first.. He will be filled with a thousand bullet holes before the year is out., I promise you this. He won't fuck with Obama. He will be buried 10 feet under and his whole family will be murdered along with him. Don't like it? Come stop me. Come die before me."
Right after that comment was submitted we grabbed the IP address from the commenter and the location was in Tennessee. We then sent the pertinent information and the actual death threat to Dr. Corsi, among others, and informed them we were not 100% certain that was the commenter but we were pretty sure it was and it could be easily verified by contacting Blogger owner Google to confirm. Dr. Corsi later informed us that Sheriff Joe's office was now investigating the death threat.
Arrest made in death threat to Arpaioby Clayton Klapper/KTAR
PHOENIX -- A 33-year-old man in Phoenix has been arrested for threatening to kill Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his family.
Deputies in Knoxville, Tennessee worked with Maricopa County Sheriff's deputies to serve a search warrant and seize a computer and other evidence from the home of Adam Eugene Cox.
The investigation into an internet death threat started in October, and Cox was arrested Friday on an unrelated warrant for assault. He is now being investigated in the internet death threat of MCSO Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his family. Deputies obtained a search warrant at Google, where they were then connected to Cox.
His threat reads in part: I plan to kill Arpaio first. He will be filled with a thousand bullet holes before the year is out. I promise you this. He won't f**k with Obama. He will be buried 10 feet under and his whole family will be murdered along with him.
The threat comes in response to the Sheriff's office's investigation into the legitimacy of Obama's birth certificate. Cox's mother confirmed with police that he is an avid supporter of president Obama and police say he has a history of assault.
MORE HERE: http://ktar.com/6/1494182/Arrest-made-in-death-threat-to-Arpaio
VIDEO: Deputies go to Google to ID blogger behind Arpaio threats
http://www.azfamily.com/news/local/Deputies-go-to-Google-to-ID-blogger-behind-Arpaio-death-threats-137677118.html
---
AZ Sheriff: TN man threatened to kill him because of Obama investigation
http://www.wbir.com/news/article/202819/2/AZ-sheriff-TN-man-threatened-to-kill-him-because-of-Obama-investigation
---
TN man arrested in death threat against Sheriff Arpaio
http://www.kpho.com/story/16619194/man-arrested-in-sheriff-arpaio-death-threat
---
MCSO: Obama fanatic threatened to kill Arpaio
http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/local/phoenix/mcso-obama-fanatic-threatened-to-kill-arpaio-01272012
---
TN man arrested in death threat against Sheriff Arpaio
http://phoenix-on.us/2012/01/27/tn-man-arrested-in-death-threat-against-sheriff-arpaio
---
Knoxville man suspected of threatening to kill Arizona's 'Sheriff Joe'
http://www.volunteertv.com/news/headlines/Knoxville_man_accused_of_threatening_to_kill_Arizonas_Sheriff_Joe_138227424.html
You can read the press release from Sheriff Joe here: http://www.mcso.org/MultiMedia/PressRelease/Arpaio%20Tennessee%20Death%20Threat.pdf
Hat tip to Mara Zebest.
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACJudge Malihi Denied Taitz's Request for Obama's Hawaii Records: Court Lacks JurisdictionFriday, January 27, 2012 10:11 AM
Farrar|Welden|Swensson|Powell v. Obama - Order Denying Orly Taitz's Letters Rogatory for Hawaii Documents Related to Obama
Order: The parties may file any post hearing pleadings by Wednesday, February 1, 2012. The Court will issue a recommendation to the Secretary of State shortly thereafter. The Court has reviewed the motion by Plaintiffs, Farrar, Lax, Judy, Malaren, and Roth, to direct and/or request the Court in Hawaii to order the release of certain Hawaii documents to the Plaintiffs. This Court lacks jurisdiction or authority to direct or request documents from Hawaii. Plaintiffs' motion is denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of January, 2012.
Full Order below and here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/79613378/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell-Order-Denying-Taitz-s-Letters-Rogatory-for-Hawaii-Documents-Related-to-Obama-1-27-2012
Previous reports on the Georgia ballot challenge here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=Georgia+Ballot+Access+Challenges
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Farrar|Welden|Swensson|Powell v. Obama - Order Denying Taitz's Letters Rogatory for Hawaii Documents Relate...
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACGeorgia Hearing: Judge Wanted To Immediately Enter Default Judgment Against ObamaThursday, January 26, 2012 1:02 PM
Update: Obama's Georgia Ballot Hearing: Judge Wanted To Immediately Enter Default Judgment Against ObamaDean Haskins on the Scene at Hearing
As we are trying to get a quick lunch, and then do some interviews, this is just a very brief synopsis of what happened today. Before the hearing started, the judge called the attorneys into his chambers and explained that he was going to enter a default judgment in their favor. Attorneys Hatfield and Irion requested to be able to present abbreviated versions of their arguments so that they would be on the record. At that point, Irion estimated he would need 20 minutes, Hatfield estimated he would need 30 minutes, and Taitz estimated she would need 2 hours.
Van Irion and Mark Hatfield made their arguments, and left. Taitz then presented her argument, calling several witnesses, until the judge asked her to make her closing statement. As her closing statement began, the judge asked if she was testifying, and, in an unconventional move, Taitz took the witness stand to testify. The judge finally asked her just to make her closing statement, which she did.
We believe that the default judgment automatically translates into the judge's recommendation to the Sec. Of State being that Obama should not appear on the ballot in Georgia.
Back to work . . . more to come!
UPDATE: From Plaintiff, in one of the Georgia challenges, Carl Swensson: To all my friends in battle,
The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.
Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. - Carl
You can also find a blow by blow account of today's hearing in Georgia here: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
Article II Super PAC reports they will post an archive of today's hearing soon as it is available: http://www.art2superpac.com
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACLive Internet Video Feed From Inside Obama's Georgia Ballot Hearings Start @ 9 AM ETWednesday, January 25, 2012 10:41 PMObama eligibility hearing to be broadcast live'Complicit media ignoring all calls for honest reporting on the issue'Joe Kovacs @ WND
A political action committee which believes Barack Obama is not legally qualified for U.S. president plans a live broadcast of tomorrow’s hotly anticipated court hearing in Atlanta regarding Obama’s eligibility.
The Article II Super PAC says it will provide uncensored, gavel-to-gavel video coverage of the event beginning at 9 a.m. Eastern at this online address.
Based in Simi Valley, Calif., the PAC says it decided to act out of a sense of frustration, since most national news outlets have been ignoring the constitutional mandate that presidents be a “natural-born citizen,” which the PAC maintains is a person who is a child of two U.S. citizen parents.
Discover what the Constitution’s reference to “natural-born citizen” means and whether Barack Obama qualifies, in the ebook version of “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”
“The PAC saw the need to do this last month, because of the often incomplete and biased coverage of this issue by mainstream news media and recently received permission from the court,” said director Helen Tansey, who will personally manage on-site efforts.
“After the office of the president of the United States was usurped by a dual-citizen candidate in 2008, the nation was awakened to the realization that the U.S. Constitution, in particular Article II and presidential eligibility, no longer matters to our elected representatives and the mainstream media,” the PAC says on its website.
“Efforts for redress against this attack on the U.S. Constitution ranging from lawsuits to merely seeking the truth as to how it could happen were met with lies, obfuscation and even ridicule. With a complicit media ignoring all calls for honest reporting on the issue, Americans harnessed the Internet and the new technologies of the 21st century to join in a communications revolution bypassing the media and bringing to life the ideals of our Founding Fathers.”
The PAC says its overall goal is to “ensure that citizens and elected officials clearly understand Article II and the definitive meaning intended by the United States of America’s Founding Fathers of ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN,’ thereby working to create a legally binding vetting apparatus which will ensure all presidential and vice-presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible in 2012 and future elections. MORE HERE: http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-eligibility-hearing-to-be-broadcast-live
Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACObama's Attorney Jablonski Slapped Down By Georgia SOS Over Obama's Ballot HearingWednesday, January 25, 2012 4:23 PM
Obama's Attorney Jablonski Slapped Down By Georgia SOS Over Obama's Ballot Access Hearing
VIA REGULAR MAIL & EMAIL
Michael Jablonski
260 Brighton Road, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
michael.jablonski@comcast.com
RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Mr. Jablonski:
I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings ("OSAH") has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will "suspend" participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.
As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State's Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.
In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.
I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this
matter.
Sincerely,
Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State
CLICK HERE: Obama's Attorney Jablonski Slapped Down By Georgia SOS - 1/25/2012
http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html
REMINDER: Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream
From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Obama's Attorney Jaberwoki Slapped Down By Georgia SOS - 1/25/2012
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACObama's Attorney Refusing To Show Up At Obama's Georgia Ballot Challenge HearingsWednesday, January 25, 2012 11:38 AMObama's Private Attorney Refusing To Show Up AtObama's Georgia Ballot Access Challenge Hearings
January 25, 2012
Hon. Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State
214 State Capitol
Atlanta, Georgia 30334
via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.
(vrusso@sos.ga.gov)
Re: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Secretary Kemp:
This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.
Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate. Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.
For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.
It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.
Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs. One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country. Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.” She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records. She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011. Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.
In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….
As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda. She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.
All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok. He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them. Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority. See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).
The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued. A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1). Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law. Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court), reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373. (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.
We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.
Very truly yours,
MICHAEL JABLONSKI
Georgia State Bar Number 385850
Attorney for President Barack Obama
cc:
Hon. Michael Malihi (c/o Kim Beal (kbeal@osah.ga.gov))
Van Irion, Esq. (van@libertylegalfoundation.org)
Orly Taitz, Esq. (orly.taitz@gmail.com)
Mark Hatfield, Esq. (mhatfield@wayxcable.com)
Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq. (vrusso@sos.ga.gov)
Stefan Ritter, Esq. (sritter@law.ga.gov)
Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. (abrumbaugh@law.ga.gov)
Darcy Coty, Esq. (darcy.coty@usdoj.gov)
Andrew B. Flake, Esq. (andrew.flake@agg.com)
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30746
REMINDER: Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream
From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACCurrent INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-BornWednesday, January 25, 2012 10:43 AM
The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation
Between Natural-Born and Native-BornAttorney Leo Donofrio
I was just made privy to a very important piece of research I had not previously been aware of. It comes by way of a comment forwarded to me by the author of the h2ooflife blog:
“I had presumed that the idiom “natural born citizen” appeared nowhere in U.S. Law other than A2S1C5, but I found it in administrative law and it is contrasted with native and naturalized citizenship. I’ve never seen any mention of this fact before and wonder how many are aware of it in the ineligibility camp. Here’s the quotes:
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html
He then quoted two provisions from the link provided, but there’s actually three at the official INS “.gov” site which establish official recognition by the federal government that native-born and natural-born should be separately delineated. When you visit the suggested link to the Immigration and Naturalization service, it brings you to “Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”
Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3) provides:
“The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…” (Emphasis added.)
Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:
“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.
The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)
And again, Interpretation 324.2(b) provides:
“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.” (Emphasis added.)
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48438.html
Three times in this official INS Interpretation – currently published by the Obama Administration – native-born and natural-born are given separate consideration. And in the third example – from Interpretation 324.2(b) – the INS clearly states that each delineation, “naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen“, is a separate status.
The INS includes the following explanation of Interpretations:
CONTINUED HERE: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACVideo: Fox 5 Atlanta: Judge Orders Obama to Appear at Ballot Access Challenge HearingTuesday, January 24, 2012 9:15 PM
Video: Fox 5 Atlanta: Judge Orders Obama to Appear at Ballot Access Challenge Hearing - VIDEO HERE
REMINDER: Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream
From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACVideo: Roger Hedgecock Tackles Obama's Eligibility And Georgia Court HearingMonday, January 23, 2012 7:38 PM
Nationally Syndicated Radio Host Roger Hedgecock Tackles Obama's Eligibility And Georgia Court HearingNeil B. Turner @ Citizens for the Constitution
Patriots;
BREAKING: The Roger Hedgecock Show; 6:00 – 9:00 pm EST (www.RodgerHedgecock.com) 877-847-6437 (January 23, 2012)
At ~ 4:20 pm PST (hour 2), Roger began talking about how we know nothing about Obama; no one knew him at Columbia (e.g. George Stephanopoulos & Wayne Allyn Root – supposed classmates); etc. etc., and why doesn’t the media ask these questions?
Here’s the replay of Hour 2:
(start at 18:55) · · · Play mp3 Roger Hedgecock 01-23-12 H2 (right-click and save as)
I called in and told the screener that I wanted to answer Roger’s question of why there were no records of Obama at Columbia. I was put on at 5:05 pm PST. (at the beginning of hour 3) (5:00 – 12:00 minutes of the broadcast)
Below I will summarize what I covered:
1. I participated in research that discovered Obama never attended Columbia, and heard the testimony of Wayne Allyn Root saying that he never attended school there with him.
2. I told Roger: You will have the answer to all your questions at a hearing in an Atlanta, GA courthouse, on Thursday, 26 January (‘I’ve heard about that’, said Roger, ‘but I don’t think it’s going anywhere’), where Judge Malihi has subpoenaed all those missing records. There will be 3 cases heard, telling us why there are no records (we don’t need Obama to be there), and determining whether a private individual (not ‘President’) named Obama should have his name on the GA Ballot as a candidate for the Office of President: ‘Article II says that ‘no person, except a natural born Citizen,… shall be eligible for the Office of President’.
3. (Roger then said we can be pretty sure that he was born in Hawaii, because they would not have put the announcement in the newspapers in anticipation of his running for president 48 years later).
‘Not so’, said I. The announcement that was published (if it was in fact actually published) in 2 newspapers were exactly the same, so they came from one ‘report’.
Also, you must be aware that someone born anywhere in the world could get an Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth – simply by someone who lived in Hawaii reporting a birth (anywhere in the world). Imagine, if you will, a proud grandma being told by her daughter that she just gave birth to a son (e.g. in Kenya). That would not be a ‘future president’ conspiracy, it would simply be a proud grandma announcing the birth of her new grandson. The address of the announcement was the grandmother’s address.
4. (Roger asked where can we get information on the live streaming of the Court Hearing?).
Go to www.TPATH.org for links and full details.
5. (Roger asked ‘do you have a website’?).
Go to www.ObamaBallotChallenge.com.
Thanks you caller. (cut off phone line).
Roger: He sounded like he knew what he was talking about.
Here is the replay of Hour 3: (5:00 – 12:00 minutes of the broadcast)
· · · Play mp3 Roger Hedgecock 01-23-12 H3 (right-click and save as)
So the word is now out on national radio. Put it to use: make audio clips of Roger’s and my comments (or send it out with the links and the timing of Roger’s and my comments on the air); post it on your websites; and get folks to start calling in to Roger’s show. He sounds ready to ‘blow the whistle’ on the Greatest Fraud of the Centuries.
In Liberty and In Truth.
Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution
REMINDER: Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream
From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACFox News' Bret Baier: Judge Orders Obama To Appear At Georgia Eligibility HearingMonday, January 23, 2012 5:33 PM
Fox News' Bret Baier: Judge Orders Obama To Appear At Georgia Eligibility Hearing - 1/23/2012 - VIDEO HERE
REMINDER: Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream
From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACAttorney Leo Donofrio Files Amicus Brief In Georgia Obama Ballot Access Challenge CasesMonday, January 23, 2012 4:33 AM
AMICUS BRIEF – Georgia POTUS Eligibility CasesAttorney Leo Donofrio
This morning, I filed an AMICUS BRIEF in the Georgia POTUS eligibility cases. The brief complies with all Rules and procedures of the Administrative Court. The brief is 54 pages, and the appendix is 155 pages. The Rules of Court require attachment to the brief of all legal authorities, other than those issued by the federal government, or the State of Georgia. There’s some very esoteric law attached thereto.
I seriously urge everyone to familiarize themselves with Lord Coke’s Report from Calvin’s Case, as well as Chancellor Ellesmere’s argument, also in Calvin’s Case, for this is the true common law genesis of jus soli subjection, which happens to be a uniquely Christian tenet of law that has been completely misunderstood in this country for too long now. Calvin’s Case is universally recognized as the common law precedent relating to jus soli, but it is so much more fascinating than you can imagine. And it will forever revolutionize understanding of the words “natural-born”.
This book contains all of the relevant arguments and reports. But the original text of Lord Coke’s Report is the proper starting point. (This document is also in the appendix to my brief.) And here’s another source with slightly modernized English and extras.
You may download the AMICUS BRIEF here.
Leo Donofrio, Esq.
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/amicus-brief-georgia-potus-eligibility-cases
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.htmlFarrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Amicus Brief From Attorney Donofrio, Georgia Ballot Challenge - 1/23...
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACJerome Corsi and Mara Zebest Debate John Woodman About Obama's Forged Birth CertificateMonday, January 23, 2012 8:52 AMExperts Debate Obama's Birth CertificateMark Gillar @ BTR
John Woodman debates Mara Zebest, Tom Harrison, and Karl Denninger on the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate.
Then, in the second half of hour two, Woodman will debate New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi who is the author of Where's The Real Birth Certificate. BTR PLAYER BELOW AND HERE. ALSO ON YOUTUBE BELOW.
Listen to internet radio with Mark Gillar on Blog Talk Radio
PREVIOUS DISCUSSION: Numerous Computer Experts Discuss Obama's Forged Birth Certificate; Tear Apart Obama Supporters Bogus Claims - VIDEO HERE
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACArticle II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video From Inside Obama's Ballot HearingsSaturday, January 21, 2012 8:40 PM
Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
From the Article II PAC website and email:
"ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS ON JANUARY 26TH IN ATLANTA GEORGIA STARTING AT 9 AM ET
The live video stream will be located at this page and on the home-page of this website.
Please see our press release for more details." (also provided below)
MORE HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
MAKE A CONTRIBUTION HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/donate.html
ArticleIISuperPAC Providing Live Video Stream From Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACCBS Atlanta News Video: Georgia Judge Orders Obama To Attend Ballot Access HearingSaturday, January 21, 2012 11:28 AM
Video: CBS Atlanta News: Georgia Judge Orders Obama To Attend Ballot Access Hearing - 1/20/2012 - VIDEO HERE
Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.
Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with this GA ballot challenge.
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACMike Huckabee Challenge to Romney: Tell Obama To Prove He Received No Foreign-Student LoansFriday, January 20, 2012 7:40 PM
Mike Huckabee Challenge to Romney on Tax Returns:
Tell Obama To Release His College Transcripts And Admissions Records
To Prove No Foreign-Student Loans
Mike Huckabee on Fox News suggested to Bill O'Reilly that Mitt Romney should challenge Obama to release his college transcripts and a copy of his admission records to show whether or not Obama had foreign student loans. Fox News - VIDEO HERE.
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACBirther Summit Editorial: Has Orly Taitz Actually Won!!! Won!!! Won???Friday, January 20, 2012 12:58 PMHAS ORLY ACTUALLY WON!!! WON!!! WON???Dean Haskins @ Birther SummitPosted: January 20, 2012
This is a follow-up to something I posted yesterday. Before making my observations, I want to make a guarantee. If it turns out that I was wrong in my previous statement, I will gladly state that I was wrong, and issue a full apology to Orly about my legal assessment (which is something I already know would never be a reciprocal agreement). However, I am certainly not prepared to do that today, regardless of Orly's "I won!!! I won!!! I won!!!" foolishness. You see, unlike Orly, I am not going to look at a cow patty, and assume that because there is evidence of a cow somewhere, I get to serve ice cream to everybody right now. Let me rephrase that . . . SELL ice cream to everybody right now.
This is one of the issues I have already discussed—that everything from Orly seems to come with her own flavor of spin. And then, once the spin has been made, it is blindly believed by people (who just want so badly for it to be true), and it starts getting posted around the internet. Problem is, when it turns out that it wasn't entirely true, the only recourse Orly has is to scream "corruption!"
Let me make a couple points to try to put this into context. First, because the first response to "birthers" by many in this country is simply to blow us off as conspiracy theorists, Michael Jablonski submitted a sloppy, weak Motion to Quash. I'm sure he thought it would suffice with the judge—since the opposition were birthers; however, Judge Malihi obviously regards his role and the legal process much more seriously than that. And, because I'm sure he wants to make certain that, at the end of these HEARINGS (not trials), there is nothing that could be viewed as procedurally improper, he's not going to grant the professional attorney involved any special favors. He will hold somebody accountable to understand the law, and I'll leave it up to you to figure out whom that might be.
Here's what will probably happen: after Jablonski recovers from his blanket party, he will likely file an amended Motion to Quash; and it will probably be one of the most thorough Motions to Quash in the history of Motions to Quash, and Judge Malihi will probably grant that motion.
In the unlikelihood that Judge Malihi does not grant his amended Motion to Quash, there is something that is virtually guaranteed to happen: Obama not showing up to an administrative law hearing in the state of Georgia. Jablonski would appear on his behalf, and present a certified "birth certificate" and proof of residency for the past 14 years. As the certified "birth certificate" will be considered self-verifying by the court, nothing Orly will say will sway it. And remember, the end result of this hearing is a non-binding recommendation to the Secretary of State. So, no, Obama will not be handcuffed in Atlanta next week (he won't even be there).
I'm not trying to be a downer, or burst anybody's bubble—but, honestly folks—we need to stop spreading the spin all over the internet, just to be made fools of when what was posted never happens. I'm amazed at the number of people who haven't figured that one out with Orly yet. It's just not going to happen like we want it to.
Actually, this denial of the Motion to Quash still doesn't address the invalidity of all the other out-of-state subpoenas Orly mailed (not served). Since Jablonski lives and works in Georgia, he was technically served. Nobody who lives outside of Georgia has been served.
As we have all come to expect, Orly continues to show the most debased levels of egomania, and still tries to attack others who have worked on this team as long as she has. She still has all the graciousness of a cactus loofah, and the attitude of a spoiled brat child (who is the only one who deserves your donations, and if you don't donate, you're an Obama operative).
So, again, when we're on the other side of this HEARING, and it turns out I am wrong, I'll freely admit it. However, and unfortunately for our side, I'm not wrong—so get ready to hear endless wails of "corruption." And, I do want to make a side note here before signing off: Orly's incompetence is, by no means, to be construed as an indictment against the other two hearings that will take place. Both of those cases have real attorneys involved, so I am hopeful that they will be able to produce positive results. It's funny . . . I haven't heard those other lawyers publicly proclaim ME, ME, ME even once. That alone gives me some hope about their cases.
Humbly,
ME ME ME ME ME ME ME
###
http://www.birthersummit.org/news/75-has-orly-actually-won-won-won.html
http://www.birthersummit.org/news/74-of-subpoenas-trials-and-a-vexatious-litigant.html
If you would like more information about the Birther Summit, please visit our website often at www.birthersummit.org or contact Dean Haskins at dean@birthersummit.org.
See the latest on Judge Malihi's response to Obama's denied motion to quash here.
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACGeorgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge HearingFriday, January 20, 2012 1:36 PM
Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to
Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing
Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012
ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.
MORE HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html
UPDATE: Judge whacks Obama in eligibility case. 'Defendant has failed to enlighten the court with legal authority'. A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot.
MORE HERE: http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena
UPDATE: Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing. A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn't a natural-born citizen and can't be president.
MORE HERE: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ga-judge-orders-president-hearing-15407321
Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.
Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with the GA ballot challenge.
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Quash Subpoenas, Georgia Ballot Challenge
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACCalifornia Voters, including Presidential Candidate, Challenge Obama on California BallotThursday, January 19, 2012 6:50 PMCalifornia Voters, including Presidential Candidate,Challenge Obama on California Ballot Obama Ballot Challenge
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Breaking News: January 19, 2012 ~ Precedent Case For Restraint of Fund Raising for Obama: Writ of Mandate ~ Served on the California Secretary of State.
Sacramento – A legal complaint was served on Obama for America (California) and the California Secretary of State Debra Bowen late Tuesday to keep British-born Barack Obama off the ballot for the Office of the President, because he does not meet the Constitutional requirement of being a U.S. Natural Born citizen according to the Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett. The legal action was filed Jan. 6 in Sacramento Superior Court by a group of 7 ad hoc registered voters including an American Independent Party candidate for President.
Several of the petitioners tried seeking resolution against Obama after the 2008 presidential election, but they were told by the California courts that it was too late to make challenges to Obama’s legitimacy, and that they did not have “standing”.
The Writ requests a temporary restraining order of Respondent Debra Bowen (SOS) to bar Obama on the Democratic Party ballot in the primary and/or General Election until the matter of eligibility and ballot access for Respondent Obama is heard. The Writ also requested a temporary restraining order against Respondent Obama and or his agents associated with the Obama for America California from further fundraising in California until further notice by the court. A final demand was for a permanent Injunction against Respondent Obama and Respondent SOS as to Respondent Obama’s ineligibility, barring him from ballot access.
Seven California voters have drawn up the Writ of Mandate over the absence of Constitutional authority and documentation that Barack Obama is eligible to occupy the Oval Office. No dual nationality citizen has ever been declared a U.S. NATURAL BORN Citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in Minor v. Happersett that a person must be born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. to two U.S. citizen parents and it has been never been overturned. The U.S. Congress in 2009 usurped the U.S. Constitution when they confirmed Mr. Obama for the Office of the Presidency. They attempted to revise the U.S. Constitution without an Amendment by confirming Obama as POTUS.
One of the seven California Petitioners is Edward C. Noonan of Olivehurst, Yuba County, CA. He is currently a 2012 Presidential candidate for the American Independent Party.
The other six California petitioners are Pamela Barnett (Director of ObamaBallotChallenge.com), Sharon Chickering, George Miller, Tony Dolz, Neil Turner, and Gary Wilmott. All seven petitioners are affirmed as Ad Hoc registered voters of California, each self represented without an attorney.
The cause of the petition is that Mr. Barack Obama does not qualify for the Office of President of the United States because both of his parents were not U.S. Citizens at the time of Obama’s birth. Article II of the US Constitution states that only Natural Born Citizens qualify for the Office of President. Barack Obama’s father was a foreign national of Kenya. This disqualifies Mr. Obama to be Commander in Chief as well as POTUS.
MORE HERE: http://obamaballotchallenge.com/breaking-ca-voters-including-presidential-candidate-challenge-obama-on-california-ballot
VIEW COMPLAINT HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/78739896/California-Writ-to-Keep-Obama-Off-Ballot-Stop-Fund-Raising
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
California Writ to Keep Obama Off Ballot, Stop Fund Raising
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACGeorgia Representative and Attorney Mark Hatfield Files Notice to Produce Against ObamaThursday, January 19, 2012 8:31 PM
Attorney and Georgia State Representative Mark HatfieldFiles Notice to Produce Against Obama in Georgia Ballot Challenge
Attorney Mark Hatfield on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell filed a notice to produce records against Obama in the Georgia Ballot Challenge. Attorney Hatfield also filed a motion for determination of placement of burden of proof in the challenge. Also Judge Malihi issued an order today related to the motion for determination which is linked below. All 3 new filings linked below.
From the Notice to Produce:
Pursuant to OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.19, Defendant Barack Obama is hereby notified to be and appear before the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, the Honorable Michael M. Malihi presiding, at the Fulton County Justice Center Building, 161 Pryor Street, Courtroom G-40, Atalanta, Georgia on January 26, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and to bring with him into said Court the following items to be used as evidence by the Plaintiffs in the above-styled case:
(a) One (1) of the two (2) original certified copies of Defendant Barack Obama's ("long form") Certificate of Live Birth as referenced in the four (4) pages of Exhibit "A" attached;
(b) All medical, religious, administrative, or other records of or related to Defendant Barack Obama's birth;
(c) Any and all United States Passports, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama;
(d) Any and all passport, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama from any country, nation, or sovereignty;
(e) Any and all college and university admission information, both undergraduate and postgraduate, for Defendant Barack Obama, including, but not limited to, admission applications; letters of recommendation; school transcripts; financial aid applications; scholarship applications; and any and all correspondence awarding admission, financial aid, scholarships, or the like;
(f) Any and all applications and accompanying materials submitted by or for Defendant Barack Obama to the State Bar of Illinois, the State Supreme Court of Illinois, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, and any other similar entity regulating the admission to the practice of law;
(g) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant Barack Obama;
(h) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant's father, Barack Obama Sr.
(i) All correspondence between Defendant Barack Obama and any other person, firm, political party, or entity discussing Defendant's status vel non as a natural born Citizen pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
Defendant will note that the preceding items are requested hereby, whether they pertain to Defendant under his name Barack Obama or any other name, including but not limited to Barack Hussein Obama II; Barry Soetoro; Barry Soebarkah; Barry Obama, or the like. See the complete Notice to Produce here.
READ BOTH NEW FILINGS AND JUDGE MALIHI'S ORDER HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html
Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.
Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with the GA ballot challenge.
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACTeam Obama Responds to Georgia Subpoenas: Files Motion to Quash Administrative SubpoenasWednesday, January 18, 2012 6:40 PM
Team Obama and DHHS Responds to Georgia Subpoenas:
Obama Files Motion to Quash Administrative Subpoenas
*UPDATES* Obama's Georgia attorney filed a motion to quash the Georgia subpoenas in the Farrar, et. al. v Obama ballot access challenge. Although we disagree 100 percent with Michael Jablonski(Obama atty) on his political arguments, the legal argument with respect to the administrative subpoenas having only limited powers and only within the State of Georgia is correct. Read the full motion provided below. Much of it is garbage however the part about the out-of-state rules is spot on. Also the response to one of the subpoenas provided below from the Department of Health and Human Services.
Obama's motion to quash:
"The sovereignty of the State of Georgia does not extend beyond the limits of the State. O.C.G.A. § 50-2-20. Since the sovereignty of the State does not extend beyond its territorial limits, an administrative subpoena has no effect. Thus, OSAH rules specify that subpoenas must be served within the State of Georgia. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5) (“A subpoena may be served at any place within Georgia….”)."
"Plaintiff‟s attorney violates two rules of practice with these subpoenas. First, they must be served within the State of Georgia. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5) (“A subpoena may be served at any place within Georgia….”). The sovereignty of the State of Georgia does not extend beyond the limits of the State. OCGA 50-2-20. The attempted use of these subpoenas to obtain documents from Hawaii and State of Washington is improper. Subpoenas issued by Georgia courts do not have extraterritorial power. Hughes v. State, 228 Ga. 593, 187 S.E.2d 135 (1972)
Complete motion to quash the subpoenas below and here.
Here's an excerpted response from Dr. Taitz, Esq.'s blog:
1. most of his motion is a total BS, irrelevant material, improper attacks on plaintiff’s counsel with an attempt to prejudice the court
2. Obama has no standing to challenge subpoenas issued and addressed to other parties. If other parties want to challenge, it is up to them. It is interesting that he mentions Susan Daniels, John Smpson and Loretta Fuddy, I wonder why? Is there something in their testimony he does not want to be heard by the judge?
3. there is nothing in subpoena issued to him, that is improper or oppressive
4. he was properly served through his attorney in Atlanta GA, within the jurisdiction _______
We want nothing more than to have witnesses put on the record detailing Obama's many discrepancies but the proper court procedures and rules must be followed to attain that. Obama should have to be there though. That is HIS hearing.
Previous reports on Georgia Ballot Access Challenges here.
UPDATE: Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing. 'Electors, Congress, not Georgia, hold responsibility for qualifications of candidates' - MORE HERE
UPDATE: Obama’s Georgia Attorney Files Motion to Quash Subpoenas in Ballot Challenge. CASE TO BE HEARD ON JANUARY 26 IN ATLANTA - MORE HERE
Farrar(Taitz) v Obama - DHHS Response to Georgia Subpoena - Obama Ballot Access Challenge - 1/18/2012
Farrar(Taitz) v Obama - Motion to Quash Georgia Subpoenas - Obama Ballot Access Challenge - 1/18/2012
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.htmlFlier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACSarah Palin: America Made Mistake Not Vetting Obama in 2008; Must Vet Better This TimeWednesday, January 18, 2012 12:20 AM
Sarah Palin on Hannity: America Made Mistake Not Vetting Obama in 2008; Must Vet Better This Time - VIDEO HERE
Sarah, check out this Obama stuff I stumbled upon over here. Imagine if this was a Republican or a Libertarian?
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
19 Dec 2011: Wash Times Ad - Obama SSN Fails E-Verify System - Support New Article II Super PAC OrgAlabama Judge Orders Military Veteran Harold Sorensen To Pay Court Costs for Ballot ChallengeTuesday, January 17, 2012 4:31 PMJudge in Obama citizenship lawsuit orders man whosued to pay Democratic Party's lawyer, court feesBy Eric Velasco @ The Birmingham News
BIRMINGHAM, Alabama --- The Jefferson County judge who dismissed a Luverne man's lawsuit to block President Obama from Alabama ballots today also ordered him to pay the state Democratic Party's court costs and lawyer fees within 45 days.
Lawyers for Mark Kennedy, the state party chairman, sought the sanctions in a motion his lawyers filed last week filed last week in the suit filed by Harold Sorensen. But one of the lawyers said during a hearing today that party officials would not try to collect if Sorensen does not file any similar lawsuits during the 2012 election cycle.
"The Democratic Party has no desire to chase after a retired military man to collect," Barry Ragsdale, one of Kennedy's lawyers, told Circuit Judge Helen Shores Lee.
Ragsdale then turned to address Sorensen. "But if I read you're bad-mouthing the court and this decision, you will feel the full wrath of me."
Sorensen told Lee he cannot afford to pay the court-ordered costs.
Ragsdale said Sorensen's suit in Jefferson County is the second one he has filed challenging Obama's citizenship and right to serve as president. A Montgomery County judge in 2009 dismissed the other Sorenson suit, which also challenged then-Republican nominee John McCain's citizenship.
"This needs to stop, Mr. Sorensen, and it needs to stop today," Ragsdale said during the hearing.
Ragsdale also criticized a request Sorensen filed last week asking Lee to step aside from his case. The motion, which Sorensen filed without counsel, cited "racial bias, lack of judicial discretion as well as lack of knowledge of the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5," court records show.
"This is scandalous," Ragsdale said to Sorensen during today's hearing. "It's uncalled for and you owe this court an apology."
Sorensen apologized. He told Lee he did not seek a new judge because of the black judge's race.
CONTINUED HERE: http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2012/01/judge_in_obama_ballot_challeng.html
PREVIOUS REPORTS: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=Alabama+ballot+challenge
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.htmlFlier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPACEd Henry to White House: What Is The Reason For Obama Not Releasing College Transcripts?Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:26 PM
Fox's Ed Henry to W.H. Press Secretary: What Is The Reason For Obama Not Releasing His College Transcripts - VIDEO HERE
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html19 Dec 2011: Wash Times Ad - Obama SSN Fails E-Verify System - Support New Article II Super PAC OrgSantorum Not Releasing Father's Naturalization Papers: WND Probe Romney's NBC StatusMonday, January 16, 2012 7:32 PMWorld Net Daily Probe Romney's Natural Born Citizen Status: Rick Santorum Not Releasing Father's Naturalization Papers
Mitt Romney not a natural-born citizen?Some point to his father's birth in Mexico, grandparents citizenship - Jerome Corsi @ WND
Amid ongoing challenges to Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility, some have raised questions about the constitutional status of the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, Gov. Mitt Romney, contending he was born in Mexico or that his father was not an American citizen at the time of his birth.
However, the available evidence shows that even under the strictest interpretation of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, Romney is a natural-born citizen, according to Article 2, Section 1.
The questions have been raised because Romney’s grandparents went to Mexico in the 1800s, where Mitt Romney’s father, George W. Romney, was born, July 8, 1907.
A genealogy of Mitt Romney has been prepared by eligibility researcher Charles Kerchner.
According to a Romney family genealogy prepared by the London, England, LDS Temple, Romney’s grandparents – Gaskell Romney and Anna Amelia Pratt Romney – were polygamous Mormons who fled the United States when the Mormon church disavowed polygamy. As the genealogy points out, polygamy was a federal crime in the U.S., but it was allowed in Mexico.
The grandparents were even married in Mexico, although each of them was born to a U.S. citizen father in U.S. sovereign territory.
Gaskell Romney was born Sept. 22, 1871, in St. George, Washington County, in the Utah Territory;Anna Amelia Pratt Romney was born May 6, 1876, in Salt Lake City, in the Utah Territory.
After the Mexican Revolution broke out in 1910, the Mormon colonies began to be endangered, starting in 1911-1912 by raids from marauders. In response, Romney’s grandparents fled Mexico, taking their 5-year-old son, George W. Romney, with them. They settled first in Oakley, Idaho, and finally in Salt Lake City, Utah.
When George W. Romney ran for president in 1968, Charles Gordon, a counsel with the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service and an Adjunct Professor of Law at the Georgetown Law Center, addressed the eligibility issue in an article in the Winter 1968 issue of the Maryland Law Review.
CONTINUED HERE: http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/mitt-romney-not-a-natural-born-citizen
Cdr. Charles Kerchner(ret) commented at WND: "Mitt Romney's father George Romney born in Mexico was a Citizen of the U.S. at birth via his citizen parents by the "jus sanguinis" laws of the U.S. going back to the founding of our nation, thus he did not have to file naturalization papers. He was a citizen at birth. Rick Santorum's father Aldo was not a Citizen at birth since he was born in Italy to Italian parents and thus would have to file naturalization papers at some point after he arrived in the USA. Rick has yet to produce copies of those papers. Repeated queries to his staff yields no answers, let alone producing copies of the naturalization papers that it was reported in WND.com that his family says they have. A follow up story is needed on that earlier WND.com story about Rick Santorum's father's exact citizenship status as to did he really naturalize, and if so, where, when, and how."
Cdr. Kerchner(ret) also commented at the Post & Email's report on the Mitt Romney Ballot Challenge saying in part: "People who are challenging Mitt Romney would have to prove that both his grandfather Gaskell and his grandmother Anna renounced and/or totally lost their birthright U.S. Citizenship when they lived as expatriates in Mexico. The U.S. Nationality Act of 1940 says they did not. That law was enacted 7 years before Mitt was born in Detroit MI in 1947.
See my report and analysis of the citizenship status of Mitt Romney. I do not believe there is any doubt that Mitt Romney is a natural born Citizen, whose foreign born father had two U.S. Citizen parents. But there are still questions out there about Rick Santorum who Italian born father did not have U.S. Citizen parents. Santorum has yet to produce copies of the naturalization papers for his father Aldo Santorum, born 1923 in Italy, which was, I believe in a part of Italy which was part of the Austrian Empire at the time. Here is my report on Mitt Romney. George Romney was not eligible, but I believe the facts show Mitt is:"
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/15/ballot-challenge-to-mitt-romneys-eligibility-filed-in-illinois/comment-page-1/#comment-62113
Ancestry-Ahnentafel Genealogy Chart for Mitt Romney – by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
See and download Mitt’s genealogy chart and citizenship status analysis for him and his parents at this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/77518311/Ancestry-Ahnentafel-Genealogy-Chart-for-Mitt-Romney-by-CDR-Charles-Kerchner-Ret
Mitt Romney is a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is constitutionally eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of our military. He was born in the USA to two U.S. Citizen parents.
Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is NOT constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama’s father was a foreign national who was never a U.S. Citizen, not even an immigrant to the USA, not even a permanent resident of the USA. The major media refuses to talk about this and many other buried topics and history regarding Obama.
MORE HERE: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/ancestry-ahnentafel-genealogy-chart-for-mitt-romney-by-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret
Ancestry-Ahentafel Genealogy Chart & Citizenship Status of Mitt Romney - by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Ad - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States - Support Article II Super PACVideo: Orly Taitz vs. Jill Nagamine; Georgia Subpoena Enforcement Hearing in HawaiiMonday, January 16, 2012 5:16 PM
Video: Orly Taitz vs. Jill Nagamine; Georgia Subpoena Enforcement Hearing in Hawaii held on Jan. 13th, 2012.
19 Dec 2011: Wash Times Ad - Obama SSN Fails E-Verify System - Support New Article II Super PAC Org
Reference: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQP563gKwIU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fg5P6higKAE&feature=related
NOTE: The PERMANENT Treaty of 1850 with the Hawaiian Kingdom exists because the Sovereigns heirs and successors exists.........Treaties supercede State laws, etc. It was made with President Taft, etc.
Now, a NON-U.S. born citizen moves to extinguish the People's Government Foundation?! Take back your Government Americans!
Replies