Subject: Re: Hawaiians Reject Obama's New Dept.of Interior Rule that supposedly creates a Native Hawaiian Tribe
Friday, September 23, 2016
Aloha L ;
HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LANDS OF THE GREAT MAHALE ARE WRITTEN IN HAWAIIAN BLOODLINES OF OUR MOKUAUHAU VIA "ANO ALODIAL TITLES:
by Michael Kumukauoha Lee
FIRST LIE:
Hawaii is seized lands neither Queen Lilioukalani nor the Hawaiian kingdom nationals willingly turned over their Allodial interest to their lands to the USA 2 Kue petitions spoke up to stop the Treaty of Annexation and only a lei remains today.
SECOND LIE:
The Newland's Resolution is illegal instrument to cede the Hawaiian Kingdom Crown lands to the USA so says the US Constitution Article 6 Section 2 the supremacy clause it is only the Executive Branch of government that can negotiate a treaty of Annexation for the US not the Legislative Branch.
THIRD LIE:
THE ADMITION'S ACT is a fraud.
After World War II the United Nations was created. The UN set-forth the decolonization of all countries under the Empirical powers of other country's.
The occupied Hawaiian Kingdom and the Hawaiian Kingdom nationals including kingdom national descendants not blood Hawaiian's
"Kopae aina's" where to vote in a Pleb-aside to seek inclusion and absorption into the USA or separate self determination.
The US failed to meet the demands of the UN Charter by allowing US citizens who where not the injured party and did not control the Hawaiian lands by Mahele Allodial titles to vote for Statehood and there was not the option two to vote for self determination.
Many Kanaka's boycotted this vote.
There fore the Hawaii vote for Statehood to the USA was a continuing fraud perpetuated not only on the Hawaiian Kingdom nations who never applied for US citizenship but where captured by the USA and given US citizen ship in 1900 to gain control over their Allodial titles going against the US Constitution of the 19th Amendment that you have to apply for US citizenship. another lie .
The so called ADMISSION'S ACT DOCUMENT is a fraud:
Article One Section One is strangely missing.
Why?
Because Article One Section One is suppose to articulate how legally the USA in a legal instrument justifies seizing the Hawaiian Kingdom lands under the UN charter mandate or International law or the US Constitutional law which it can not.
Why?
The USA has no legal instrumentality to claim the Hawaiian Kingdom Lands where legally ceded to the USA.
So Hawaii became a giant TRUST like Bishop Estate.The U.S. became the Board of Trustees and the Hawaiian Kingdom National became beneficiaries of this FAKE STATE TRUST.
This is spelled out in the HAWAII STATE CONSTITUTION ARTICLE ONE SECTION ONE;
"We have the right to makes laws in the State of Hawaii because of the people."
What people?
No one can make laws unless they own said land and only Hawaiian's of the blood still have interest in their family allodial titles see Kumu Mike Lee's Allodial title classes on YOUTUBE.
It is impossible under the "GREAT MAHELE a Foreign Allodial title to transfer the private or Hawaiian Kingdom Crown land in a Allodial title because Hawaii Allodial titles can only be transferred from Grantor to Grantee by having Hawaiian bloodlines in the Hawaiian genealogy.
You must have a living Hawaiian of the blood to be able accept the Allodium and that is impossible if the USA is not a Hawaiian Nation of the Hawaiian blood lines.
YOU HAVE TO HAVE A DROP OF HAWAIIAN BLOOD TO RECEIVE A ANO ALODIAL TITLE UNDER THE GREAT MAHELE.
The interest of Ano Allodial is forever the way the Mahele laws where written and it can not be transferred as if it is fee simple or freehold or fee hold it is superior which Western Authors purposely overlook by quoting US allodial title law which had nothing to do with the HAWAII KINGDOM GOVERNMENT creation of Hawaiian allodial titles what so ever.
The U.S. Federal Supreme Court dealt with Feign Allodial titles not created in the land boundary's of the USA in the US Federal Supreme Court case "Foster and Elam v. Neilson " 27 U.S.. 253 (1829).
This case dealt with lands in Louisiana, New Orleans and the country the land was received from France west of the Mississippi through the treaty of Paris concluded between Great Britain, France, and Spain on February 10, 1763
The case boiled down to this the United States Supreme Court rules that it has no control or possession, or control over FOREIGN ALLODIAL TITLES..
The "Great Mahele is a Foreign Allodial title that the USA has no control or possession of since inception in 1847 and 1848, 1853 by US case president of the US Federal Supreme Court, and US Constitutional law ,and Hawaiian Kingdom law, and the UN Charter and international law.
NO MATTER HOW MUCH LIPSTICK YOU PUT ON A PIG THE PIG IS STILL A PIG AS A LIE IS STILL A LIE THAT THE KINGDOM OF HAWAII WAS LEGALLY UNDER US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LAW CEDE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
"This fact was proved out by the US Justice Department memo in 1988, the U.S, Justice Department issued and advisory to the State Department in which the unconstitutional and illegal nature of the 1898 Newlands Resolution is quite clearly spelled out. The memo explains that the Senate rejected an annexation treaty that had been negotiated by President McKinley with the "Republic of Hawaii."
In an effort to by-pass the treaty process, Sen Newlands of Navada sponsored a joint resolution of annexation. A Senate Foreign Relations Committee report, issued at the time, explained that the resolution relied on the annexation of Texas as a president. The Justice Department memo, however, points out a major difference between Texas and Hawaii,
Because Texas was acquired as a new state, the joint resolution annexing Texas relied on the constitutional power of Congress to admit new states, and was not a proper precedent for annexing a land that would be retained as a possession or territory. In other words, annexation of Hawaii could not be achieved in a constitutional manner by a simple legislative act.
The Hawaiian Islands were foreign soil in 1898, some 2,100 miles beyond U.S, territory, based on the international law principle of extraterritoriality, a U.S. joint resolution to annex Hawaii could not legally extend that far. The 1988 memo fails to identify any provisions in the U.S. Constitution or any principle in the international law which could have provided a legal basis for the United States to acquire Hawaii by a joint resolution.
In fact, the memo says that during the annexation debates Congressman Ball characterized the effort to anex Hawaii by joint resolution as "a deliberate attempt to do unlawfully that which can not be lawfully done,"
article appeared in The Honolulu Advertiser Sunday March 12, 2000 written by:Steven T. Newcomb is Director of Indigenous Law Institute.
The more the U.S. Government and the Fake State Pushes in a illegal act the more the world will see that the phrase," American exceptionalism" is a lie a well. The United States criticized the Russian President for annexing part of the Ukraine illegally but the U.S. has done no difference to the harm and injury that in the "Apology Resolution of 1993" passed by Congress and signed by the U.S. President did not go far enough as the U.S. preaches to Russia to release territory illegally seized the U.S. Government should take it's own advice as well to release Hawaii to its rightful owners the Kingdom of Hawaii and its citizenry the Hawaiian Kingdom National if the US is truly what it says a"exceptional Nation.
'
From: laurel
To: Michael Lee
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:42 AM
Subject: Hawaiians Reject Obama's New Dept.of Interior Rule that supposedly creates a Native Hawaiian Tribe
As President Obama announces his plans to federalize Hawaiians as a tribe,
Begin forwarded message:
From: kDate: September 22, 2016 10:42:49 PM HSTTo: nytimesSubject: Substantial Numbers of Native Hawaiians Reject Obama's New Dept.of Interior Rule that supposedly creates a Native Hawaiian Tribe
HealaniFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
4:42pm Sep 22
Press Conference 12 noon @ ‘Iolani Palace
Hawaiians Openly Reject President Obama’s new rule—a DOI invented process to create a Native Hawaiian Tribe
As President Obama announces his plans to federalize Hawaiians as a tribe,
Hawaiian community leaders and groups who have for many years protested attempts to turn Hawaiians into Native Americans (the Akaka Bill),
will hold a press conference Friday, September 23rd at 12 noon in front of‘Iolani Palace. They will restate their opposition to the Obama Administration’s Department of Interior (DOI) rule change.
“This change is intended to circumvent legal, congressional processes, and Hawaiian community input,”
said Healani-Sonoda Pale, founding member of the group, Protest Na‘i Aupuni and one of the organizers of the press conference.
“President Obama tasked his DOI to come up with a process that will allow him to use his Executive Order privilege and designate federally chosen groups of Hawaiians as recognized.
Without any congressional oversight or congressional vetting, President Obama and his successor will confer immense power on a pseudo native government,”
Sonoda-Pale said. “And this will allow the DOI to move forward with a process of creating land and resource settlements that typically follow legitimate, congressionally conferred federal recognition.”
Two years in the making, the Obama/DOI rule change was created in response to Office of Hawaiian Affairs CEO Kamana’opono Crabbe’s May 5, 2014 letter to Secretary of State John Kerry.
In it, he essentially questioned the legitimacy of US jurisdiction in Hawaii by requesting proof of how the Hawaiian Kingdom was legally annexed to the United States.
However, rather than answer the question, President Obama instructed the DOI to hold public hearings in Hawaii to discuss federal recognition.
During the summer of 2014, hearings were held for 2 weeks on 5 of the Hawaiian Islands.
Thousands of Hawaiians lined up, but only hundreds were able to testify.
The overwhelming majority (over 95%) rejected the idea of a DOI Rule change and spoke powerfully in opposition to any Federal or State controlled process for sovereignty.
“It feels like the overthrow all over again,” says Kahalu’u Kupuna and Protest Na’i Aupuni member Kapu Lambert.
“The finalization of the DOI Rule forebodes more hardship Hawaiians. Many of our people are homeless and are at the bottom of every socioeconomic statistic in Hawaii.
We cannot trust the State and Federal governments and their collaborators to do the right thing on our behalf especially when it comes to Hawaiian sovereignty and lands. I refuse to accept this Rule.”
“After tens of millions of dollars were spent by the state agency Office of Hawaiian Affairs to lobby for federal recognition, after 15 years of resistance to being federalized,
we are now going to be saddled with being a fake tribe and federally designated so-called leaders,” said Sonoda-Pale.
Asked why the US would want to federalize Hawaiians when, in fact, hundreds of tribes on the continent have been trying to get federally recognized for many decades, Sonoda-Pale said,
“Why? Because they want our land. They want to create a so-called universal land claims settlement of our Crown and Government lands, aka ‘Ceded Lands.
’ And further,” she said, the United States of America, who has never been respectful of indigenous peoples—as we are seeing in North Dakota,
is trying to dissolve our rights as a people to self-determination as defined by international law, and our human rights as indigenous people that have also been codified by the United Nations.
Replies
Mahalo David Corrigan for supporting our event with Big Island News Now!!
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:42 AM
Subject: Hawaiians Reject Obama's New Dept.of Interior Rule that supposedly creates a Native Hawaiian Tribe
Michael Lee /
Michael Lee
Subject: Re: Hawaiians Reject Obama's New Dept.of Interior Rule that supposedly creates a Native Hawaiian Tribe
Kim, Fr. Alapaki /
From: John Bond
Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:51 AM
Subject: Federal government set to announce Native Hawaiians can form sovereign government
To: pilipo souza a href="mailto:pilipo808@gmail.com" target="_blank">pilipo808@gmail.com>
HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) -
The federal government is set to announce that Native Hawaiians are eligible for form a sovereign government that would have the same rights as Native American tribes.
The U.S. Department of the Interior is scheduled to make the formal announcement in Washington at 4 a.m. Friday, Hawaii time.
The proposed rule would make Native Hawaiians eligible for federal recognition. The department alerted stakeholders about the new rule, but also asked them not to comment until after the announcement.
Opponents, however, wasted no time in blasting the rule.
"It's not self-determination, and it undermines our right to self-determination, and it undermines the Hawaiian community voices that have loudly said 'no,'" said Healani Sonoda-Pale, one of the founding members of the group Protest Na'i Aupuni.
Based on previous draft rules, Native Hawaiians would be able to form a sovereign government with rights similar to those given to Native American tributes. At least 50,000 Native Hawaiians would have to support such a government before it could negotiate with the federal and state governments for land and other benefits.
"That's a joke, because basically the only form of government is a federally recognized tribe that is managed by the Department of the Interior," said Sonoda-Pale, adding that she doesn't trust the department.
During a series of public hearings more than two years ago, federal government officials faced a buzzsaw of opposition as they stressed the need to work together.
But Sonoda-Pale said that's something for Native Hawaiians alone to decide.
"We still kinda need to come together and decide on our won where we want to go instead of having the state and the federal government coming in and telling us where we should go," she said.
pilipo souza
From: Keala Kelly
Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Federal government set to announce Native Hawaiians can form sovereign government
To: pilipo souza
facebook:
Melissa Leina'ala Haa Moniz
VALUES OF ALOHA
ALOHA—
...See MoreAloha is a value, one of unconditional love.
Aloha is the outpouring and receiving of the spirit.
News Feed
Charmaine Bugado shared her post.
Making a big noise! #Aolefedrec Hilo peeps:
3:45 - 5:00pm by the Kamehameha Statue
We don't accept Federal Recognition! Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands is ALREADY recognized by the Family of Nations in 1843!!
Kealoha Kahunaaina Iona shared Big Island Video News'spost.
We are reviewing the rules and I will come out with a position on the new statement after familiarizing myself with any changes.
Until then my position remains firm:
I STAND AGAINST FEDERAL RECOGNITION AND THE FRAUD OF NATIVE HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT CONTRIVED TO CONFORM TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR. I SEE IT AS AN ATTEMPT TO AQUIRE WHAT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE THROUGH LAWFUL TREATY AND THIS INCLUDES THE 2.2 MILLION ACRES OF SUBSISTENCE KINGDOM GOVERNMENT LANDS NEVER CEDED NOR CONVEYED AND NEVER HELD IN CLEAR TITLE BY THE FORCED MILITARY AMERICAN OCCUPATION PF HAWAII.
BREAKING NEWS: United States goes forward with "Part 50 – Procedures for Reestablishing a Formal Government-to-Government Relationship with the Native Hawaiian Community"...
Melissa Leina'ala Haa Moniz
This is where we are totally SCREWED OVER!!!!
***********************
Does the final rule authorize compensation for past wrongs?
No. The rule does not authorize or in any way contemplate compensation for any past wrongs.
But because the Native Hawaiian Governing Entity would have the same inherent sovereign governmental authorities as do federally recognized tribes in the continental United States, it would have the capacity to sue and be sued (subject to sovereign immunity and other jurisdictional limitations), and the ability to file suit to seek redress for past wrongs.
The final rule does not, however, alter the sovereign immunity of the United States or of the State of Hawaii against claims for past wrongs.
**************************
THE FINAL RULE DOES NOT, HOWEVER, ALTER THE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY OF THE UNITED STATES, OR OF THE STATE OF HAWAII AGAINST CLAIMS FOR PAST WRONGS.
GOT IT?
WTF?
facebook:
Walter Ritte
THE TRUTH IS...WE ARE ALREADY AN INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN NATION AND A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY OF NATIONS SINCE THE 1840'S.
WalterRitte
9/22/16___________________________________________________________________________________
The Truth
Today, the truth regarding the US and its role in the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom can no longer be denied. Thanks to Hawaiian scholars of the 21st century, the truth has been thoroughly scrutinized and confirmed by international institutions of justice. The US has been in violation of both US and international law since the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom in 1893, through the entirety of the 20th century, and to this day. Violations of this nature are subject to international law for which there is no statute of limitations.
In total disregard of the fact that the Hawaiian Kingdom was the only non-European state accepted into the international family of nations under Kamehameha III, with multiple treaties of neutrality and commerce throughout the world including the US, the US military nonetheless in 1893 held Queen Liliuokalani captive in isolation for six months, forcefully took control of her seat of government at Iolani Palace, then swiftly proceeded to activate all means necessary to consolidate total control of the Hawaiian Islands.
As the US attained control of all segments of the Kingdom, an attempted treaty of cession failed, so it simply passed a joint resolution of congress, ceding the Hawaii Islands to itself.
Two international courts of justice, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) and the Swiss Federal Criminal Court (SFCC) in 2001 and 2016 respectively confirmed indisputably the continuity of the Kingdom and the necessity of the Acting Government to represent the interests of the Kingdom. In addition, the SFCC confirmed that Switzerlandʻs 1864 treaty with the Hawaii Kingdom remains in effect, has recognized the Acting Government pursuant to the doctrine of necessity in keeping with the PCA, and did accept the filing of complaints of alleged war crimes against specified Swiss citizens and US citizens, subject to preliminary investigations.
The decisions of both the PCA and the SFCC could have been summarily dismissed had the US simply provided evidence of an executed treaty of cession with the Hawaiian Kingdom. Failure to do so absolutely confirms that the US has illegally occupied the Hawaiian Kingdom since the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893.
We are at an intersection of history, guided by the laws and judicial institutions of world that has placed our people face to face with a criminal entity, the United States of America who refuses to follow its own laws and the laws of the international family of nations. It is an indisputable fact that the Hawaiian Kingdom is illegally occupied by the most powerful nation in the world. As citizens of the Hawaiian Kingdom, we face a fundamental awakening of our inherent obligation to restore, care for and protect our sacred lands, our civilization, and our government.
Alexander Kalauokalani Pe'a shared Walter Ritte's post.
Maria Taylor shared Walter Ritte's post.
Dept. of Inter...here comes the TRIBE.
Kaukaohu Wahilani shared Walter Ritte's post.
Pono Kealoha shared Leighton R. Tseu's post.
Paul K Gumapac shared Walter Ritte's post.
Stephanie Sanchez-Sagucio shared Punohu Kekaualua'spost.
Lol, these guys trying for confuse us. Telling us we can form our own government, but in 2014 they acknowledged that we are a nation, that means we already sovereign and would be wasting time creating something which already exists. Our nation laws apply to anyone born here, don't try to put rule, regulations or laws over a car(nation) that you have no title to.
A`ole, `a`ole, `a`ole pono! We are already a recognized Nation State, a Sovereign and separate kingdom, We are not Americans!
Foster Ampong shared Walter Ritte's post.
刀林 shared Walter Ritte's post.
Puanani Rogers
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next