Military Coup in Honduras

When i heard about it a few nights ago about how the military took action against the Honduran President Manuel Zelaya who arrested him & sent him into exile in Costa Rica, I couldn't help but think back to what occured with Queen Liliuokalani back in 1893. I've been watching videos on it, gathering info. on the details what happened reported by non-US media, and I couldn't help but make comparisons. They say that he was about to hold a controversial referendum but that's when the Supreme Court stepped in, vowing that they were defending the rule of law, saying that what Zelaya was doing was illegal. Worse, Congress claimed that they accepted what was a letter of resignation from the President, though he denied having written it. Even Pres. Obama, which is what got me, said something like this is like going backwards, and that he hopes that we don't see more of these, where military coupls are a means for political transition. Now tell me, how much of this is similar to what happend to the HK? And how much of it actually differs? Although I don't know all the details of their constitution and if it was illegal for the President to have this referendum or as they say seeking to change the constitution to allow him to stand for re-election, did they have to go to extremes? Just seeing the people going against their own military says a lot. Yesterday while watching a video on BBC's website, they even pointed to the speak of Congress who was sworn in as the interim (I guess) Pres. that it is more of an elite group that is taking over. Again, akin to what happened in Hawaii. And yet I continue to read about these opinions of other countries, for most (based on the info. I've gathered myself) other countries, they support Zelaya and like Obama, recognizes him as the legal head of state. Yet again, I go back to what happened to the HK, why didn't other nations recognize Queen Liliuokalani as the head of State? Of course that's an easy one to answer, but I'd be interested to see others think.

You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • The realities of the New World Order plus "our schools, press, TV, and some politicians all collude against us to prevent independent thinking." Watch out for American media (e.g. Hearst) especially = Homogenized Milk where they want us to believe what they want us to believe with no deviations from their norm. If one deviates from their norm they are often condemned and/or portrayed as a criminal or made into a criminal. Signs of the New World Order. One. Way. Of. Thinking. Trying to brainwash us LOL

    Like how they did to her. Try/tried to vilify (i.e. "to speak ill of; defame; slander") her as though she was incapable, inept, and lacked leadership. Of course she had ho'ohaole stalkers stalking her, imprisoning her, and strong arming her to allegedly surrender... though it was under duress and stress. Fortunately not all Hawaiians believed their B.S. However the New World Order lives on and anyone who so much as mentions the New World Order is what... vilified too.

    One can safely deduce that the Feds are behind it. They are part of the New World Order so I do not believe everything that I read. Though I believe in the GOOD of the U.S. unfortunately there are some PILAU people who do PILAU so it does not surprise me what they are doing to Zelaya. All part of the New World Order.

    And Obama is part of it too. He is a great orator and so was Hitler yet what... no offense but SO MANY Hawaiians voted for him so obviously it works on so many Hawaiians. Also he may CLAIM to support Zelaya but from what I know about the Feds what they say does not necessarily align with what they are doing behind the scenes. I have a feeling that he is covertly working AGAINST Zelaya. Perception is reality in the eye of the beholder. He wants us to believe that he supports Zelaya but guess what... the U.S. is part of the New World Order. They will say and/or print whatever it takes to convince us that the U.S. supports Zelaya... while they work against him.

    IMHO another good example is how the press in Hawai'i tries to vilify Patrick Kahawaiolaa who was evicted from Keaukaha:

    http://archives.starbulletin.com/2003/02/13/news/story4.html

    BTW I know him and guess what... what the press does not mention is that some of his grandkids are of mixed ethnicities and he is fighting for them AND for other Hawaiian keiki yet what they VILIFY him in the press. Guess what? He REFUSES to grant interviews with the local press because they misquote him every time. His direct words to me. Not mine... and I believe him. Unfortunately some Hawaiians believe the defamation of his character that is printed in the local press. BTW Hawaiian Homes Chairman Micah Kane (a fellow Kamehameha Schools' graduate) did not come to his defense. IMHO we should never forget that but these are all connected in some way.

    The power of the local media (e.g. many Hawaiians voted for Obama knowing that he has not helped Hawaiians yet hoping that he does but to date IMHO he has done nothing to help HAWAIIANS.) The power of some politicians in Hawai'i (e.g. Kane was selected by Lingle.) The power of the New World Order (e.g. ousting Lili'uokalani, Zelaya, and many others, controlling our schools, controlling our press, and trying to control our thoughts.)

    Malama ~ Lana
    • If one deviates from their norm they are often condemned and/or portrayed as a criminal or made into a criminal. Signs of the New World Order. One. Way. Of. Thinking. Trying to brainwash us LOL

      Hmm, they already have. Like in the past they've done that, make the whole world believe that Hawaii is a part of the US. Worse, some will go to talk about how we had a great American - King Kamehameha. WTF?

      But that's exactly what they seem to be doing in Honduras. Again, I dunno what the details of the constitution is, but if it was "illegal", do what needs to be done. Like how the US did w/ Nixon. lol They didn't exile him. Geez. And now you have the populace getting hurt due to the military b/c they're so upset, they're going against the military.


      she had ho'ohaole stalkers stalking her, imprisoning her, and strong arming her to allegedly surrender.

      Stalking...hmm, kinda like people STALKING our conversations & decide to post "blogs" or in "forums" on how they feel about us, the ones who had conversations among one another but they felt it was necessary to share with the rest of the "world" in order to gain sympathy. But I digress.


      Also he may CLAIM to support Zelaya but from what I know about the Feds what they say does not necessarily align with what they are doing behind the scenes. I have a feeling that he is covertly working AGAINST Zelaya.

      That's why I was confused too at first, but I dunno really. That's why I had to find out for myself, not via US sources but through British sources, the what & why. Still confusing, and hard to see who they make as the bad guy, esp. since I saw Obama said what he had to say in support of Zelaya, but the details described seemed too much like what happened with the HK, yet here's the US, supporting the President, but they never helped with the Queen. Sure Pres. Cleveland told the PG to reinstate the Queen, but they could've taken action against their own.
This reply was deleted.