Having said that, the Anglo (missing foreskin) circumcision society lost their will to naturalization.
Anglo's hacked off their foreskin and from that ritual the Anglo's moved to a state governing entity.
Act 195 is a state governing action therefore it's a missing foreskin.
Are you missing your foreskin?
Replies
Sexual connotations on this post..............interesting Freudian slip/ messages showing here.
A Freudian slip, also called parapraxis, is an error in speech, memory, or physical action that is interpreted as occurring due to the interference of some unconscious ("dynamically repressed") wish, conflict, or train of thought. The concept is thus part of classical psychoanalysis.
Slips of the tongue and the pen are the classical parapraxes, but psychoanalytic theory also embraces such phenomena as misreadings, mishearings, temporary forgettings, and the mislaying and losing of objects.
In general use, the term 'Freudian slip' has been debased to refer to any accidental verbal slips of the tongue.[1] Thus many examples are found in explanations and dictionaries which do not strictly fit the psychoanalytic definition.
For example: He: 'What would you like—bread and butter, or cake?' She: 'Bed and butter... Whoops!'[1]
In the above, the woman may be presumed to have a sexual feeling or intention that she wished to leave unexpressed, not a sexual feeling or intention that was dynamically repressed. Her sexual intention was therefore secret, rather than unconscious, and any 'parapraxis' would inhere in the idea that she unconsciously wished to express that intention, rather than in the sexual connotation of the substitution.
just pointing out messages.........Anglos not the only bunch of folks to mess around with male anatomy. Ancient Hawaiians practiced kahe ule - subincision of the penis, slitting the foreskin. See Polynesian Family Systems of Ka'u, Hawai'i by Mary Kawena Pukui and E.S. Craighill Handy, pg 94-95.
Whether a foreskin is intact or not ain't the problem here. The illegal and belligerent continuing occupation of Hawai'i by the U.S. IS the problem.
Handy also was interested in my Tutu man Edward Niaupio for he was one of his subjects. Edward did not have children because of malpractice by the Judds. But Handy knew the leaders of Koolaupoko, one that could take care whole communities and often went to Tutu Puku. So did Mc Calister, my dad he too has been recentlly published. Need to get conscious about the missionaries and what they did to Na Kanaka men or little boys at the point of a gun.
The foreskin was a rigor attack on Na Kanaka men for their occupation of Hawaii
Nope disagree! But thanks for the in put. this is a sticky issue with lots of people.
But one needs to think about this, removal of foreskin came with Judaism. Ancients or first people did not practice the removal of foreskin! I forgot about this practice. My dad recently passed, and my mother being a Christian woman slammed the Judaism at my father with rigor.
I witness this phenomenon whole heartedly. But, I forgot about it! So in my opinion the Hawaiian Kingdom is Judaism, therefore the political power lies within that 'roll' which I oppose.
But thanks for the citations. I would like to hear from Ku Ching on this one, he is so too the point, scientific and no nonsense.
It is so typical for Anglo's to see the light in others but no within themselves. That's just because their is a lack of ones own understanding of that foreskin. Hawaiian Kingdom adopted Judaisim practices. That too came with governing essentials is my point.
Russians originated from Australia too! Check out that research it is far interesting to me to see this migration from people of the world. Which is basically what the Act 195 is reaching out to the world of people.
I cannot in good conscience participate in this comical charade. Act 195 is a redundant piece of kukae that burns the puka mimi of any decent, intelligent, person of integrity and honor. This piece of okole hi is the same as a high school student-body government with as much as the same clout. The redundancy is reflected in OHA, DHHL, State Association of the Hawaiian Civic Club, CNHA, and the U.S. agerncies that help to create the fraud.
Why attempt to control us in their WASP racist U.S.A. sandbox when we own the entire recreational park including the parking stalls and grounds-equipment?
One has to be mentally-challenged or brain-washed enough to be com[pliant like sheep to be herded into a tiny sandbox and redefined as the U.S.A. pet animal tethered to remain within that flea-infested sandbox. This is why my family household will NOT participate or subscribe to this maggot-ridden Act 195 but remain proud Hawaii nationals of the still-existing Kingdom of Hawaii which is still under continuous unlawful, belligerent occupation of the United States of America, the world's racist bully and international criminal terrorist.
The U.S.A. continues to make a mockery of justice, honor, integrity, democracy, and freedom. Fuck 'em!
Male circumcision is the surgical removal of some or all of the foreskin (prepuce) from the penis.[1] The word "circumcision" comes from Latin circum (meaning "around") and cædere (meaning "to cut"). Early depictions of circumcision are found in cave paintings and Ancient Egyptian tombs, though some pictures are open to interpretation.[2][3][4] Religious male circumcision is considered a commandment from God in Judaism.[5][6] In Islam, though not discussed in the Qur'an, male circumcision is widely practised and most often considered to be a sunnah.[7] It is also customary in some Christian churches in Africa, including some Oriental Orthodox Churches.[8] According to the World Health Organization (WHO), global estimates suggest that 30% of males are circumcised, of whom 68% are Muslim.[9] The prevalence of circumcision varies mostly with religious affiliation, and sometimes culture. Most circumcisions are performed during adolescence for cultural or religious reasons;[10] in some countries they are more commonly performed during infancy.[9] Circumcision is also used therapeutically, as one of the treatment options for balanitis xerotica obliterans, paraphimosis, balanitis, posthitis, balanoposthitis and urinary tract infections.[11]
Circumcision reduces the risk of HIV infection in populations that are at high risk.[12] Evidence among heterosexual men in sub-Saharan Africa shows a decrease risk of between 38 and 66% over 2 years[13] and in this population it appears cost effective.[14] Evidence of benefit for women is controversial[15][16] and evidence of benefit in developed countries and among men who have sex with men is yet to be determined.[17][18] Ethical concerns remain regarding the implementation of campaigns to promote circumcision.[19] The WHO currently recommends circumcision as part of a program to prevention of HIV transmission in areas with high endemic rates of HIV.[20] According to the Royal Dutch Medical Association (2010), no professional association of physicians currently recommends routine circumcision[21]. Some bodies have discussed under what circumstances neonatal circumcision is ethical.[22]
There is controversy regarding circumcision. Arguments that have been raised in opposition to circumcision include that it adversely affects penile function and sexual pleasure, is justified only by medical myths, is extremely painful, and is a violation of human rights.[23] Those raised in favour of circumcision include that it provides important health advantages which outweigh the risks, has no substantial effects on sexual function, has a low complication rate when carried out by an experienced physician, and is best performed during the neonatal period