INDOCTRINATION OF THE MASSES WITH THE INTENTIONS OF ASSUMING THE ROYAL FAMILIES LANDS, ETC. BY TREASONOUS PERSONS SUPPORTED BY THE UNITED STATES, ET.ALS.
by Amelia Gora (2015)
The 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America is a permanent friendship treaty which was signed by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli and also for his heirs and successors with the United States of America President Zachary Taylor.
Only the Kamehameha III's heirs and successors are parties to the treaty. In other words, the contract involves only Kamehameha III's - Kauikeaouli's family with his heirs - first and successors - the last.
1854 Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli died. His heir was his hanai son Alexander Liholiho who was designated to be Kamehameha IV.
Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli was married to Nahienaena; Kekualoa; Gini Lahilahi; and Kalama. He had children, step children, and hanai/adopted children who inherited sovereignty.
His heirs were his own and successors were his hanai/adopted children and their step sibling's who were Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's, and Kaumualii's children, step children, and hanai/adopted children.
Many Kamehameha's existed. Many heirs and many successors existed.
| Kamehameha III | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||||
| King of the Hawaiian Islands (more...) | |||||
| Reign | June 6, 1825 – December 15, 1854 | ||||
| Predecessor | Kamehameha II | ||||
| Successor | Kamehameha IV | ||||
| Kuhina Nui | Kaʻahumanu I Kaʻahumanu II Kaʻahumanu III Keoni Ana |
||||
| Spouse | Queen Kalama | ||||
| Issue | Keaweaweʻulaokalani I Keaweaweʻulaokalani II Kīwalaʻō (illegitimate) Albert Kūnuiākea (illegitimate) Kamehameha IV (hānai) Kaʻiminaʻauao (hānai) |
||||
|
|||||
| House | Kamehameha | ||||
| Father | Kamehameha I | ||||
| Mother | Keōpūolani | ||||
| Born | August 11, 1813 Keauhou Bay at North Kona,Hawaiʻi island |
||||
| Died | December 15, 1854 (aged 41) Hoihoikeʻea, Honolulu, Oʻahu |
||||
| Burial | January 10, 1855[1][2] Mauna ʻAla Royal Mausoleum |
||||
| Signature |  |
||||
1863 - Kamehameha IV - Alexander Liholiho died. His son had died earlier. He was survived by Emma, and sibling's, step sibling's, hanai siblings. Many were Kamehameha's heirs and successors.
Many Kamehameha's existed. Many heirs and many successors.
| Kamehameha IV | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||||
| King of the Hawaiian Islands (more...) | |||||
| Reign | January 11, 1855 – November 30, 1863 | ||||
| Investiture | January 11, 1855 Kawaiahaʻo Church |
||||
| Predecessor | Kamehameha III | ||||
| Successor | Kamehameha V | ||||
| Kuhina Nui | Keoni Ana Kaʻahumanu IV |
||||
| Spouse | Queen Emma | ||||
| Issue | Albert Edward Kauikeaouli | ||||
|
|||||
| House | House of Kamehameha | ||||
| Father | Kekūanāoʻa Kamehameha III (hānai) |
||||
| Mother | Kīnaʻu Kalama (hānai) |
||||
| Born | February 9, 1834 Honolulu, Oʻahu |
||||
| Died | November 30, 1863 (aged 29) Honolulu, Oʻahu |
||||
| Burial | February 3, 1864[1] Mauna ʻAla Royal Mausoleum |
||||
| Religion | Church of Hawaii | ||||
| Signature |  |
||||
1872 -Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha died.
| Kamehameha V | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||||
| King of the Hawaiian Islands (more...) | |||||
| Reign | November 30, 1863 — December 11, 1872 | ||||
| Predecessor | Kamehameha IV | ||||
| Successor | Lunalilo | ||||
| Kuhina Nui | Victoria Kamāmalu/Kaʻahumanu IV Kekūanāoʻa |
||||
|
|||||
| House | House of Kamehameha | ||||
| Father | Kekūanāoʻa Ulumāheihei Hoapili (hānai) |
||||
| Mother | Kīnaʻu Nāhiʻenaʻena (hānai) Kalākua Kaheiheimālie (hānai) |
||||
| Born | December 11, 1830 Honolulu, Oahu |
||||
| Died | December 11, 1872 (aged 42) Honolulu, Oahu |
||||
| Burial | January 11, 1873[1] Mauna ʻAla Royal Mausoleum |
||||
| Signature |  |
||||
1874 - King William Lunalilo died. His mother was Auhea/Kekauluohi. His father was Charles Kanaina.
They were the step parents of Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's, Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's, and Kaumualii's children, step children, and hanai/adopted children.
King William Lunalilo was a successor of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli. His step sibling's were heirs and successors.
Many of Kamehameha III's - Kauikeaouli's heirs and successors existed.
| Lunalilo | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
.jpg) |
|||||
| Ke Aliʻi o ko Hawaiʻi Pae ʻAina (more...) | |||||
| Reign | January 8, 1873 – February 3, 1874 | ||||
| Investiture | January 9, 1873 Kawaiahaʻo Church |
||||
| Predecessor | Kamehameha V | ||||
| Successor | Kalākaua | ||||
|
|||||
| House | House of Keōua Nui/House of Kamehameha House of Kalaimamahu |
||||
| Father | Kanaʻina | ||||
| Mother | Kekāuluohi | ||||
| Born | January 31, 1835 Pohukaina, Honolulu, Oahu |
||||
| Died | February 3, 1874 (aged 39) Haimoeipo, Honolulu, Oahu |
||||
| Burial | February 28, 1874[1] Mausoleum in front ofKawaiahaʻo Church |
||||
| Religion | Church of Hawaii (Church of England/Anglican) | ||||
The cultivation of lies about Kamehameha V - Lot being the last of the Kamehameha's was set in place by the head of the treasonous persons, Sanford B. Dole, attorney, in his 1874 article, "Thirty Days of Hawaiian History"
The continued promotion and indoctrination of the lies were conveyed onto the people over time. Also see definition of indoctrination and methods of disinformation on the links below in the reference section.
The Truth about the Kamehameha's still existing was pushed aside by the treasonous persons and supported by the Judges who were also part of the treasonous persons.
1883 - Ruth Keelikolani died. She was one of the siblings of Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha. She too was claimed to be the "last of the Kamehameha's.
Charles Kanaina who was the third husband of Auhea/Kekauluohi denied that she was the only heir of Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha.
Auhea/Kekauluohi was the widow of Kamehameha and Kamehameha II - Liholiho. She was also the step mother of all of Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's, Kamehameha II - Liholiho's children, step children, and hanai/adopted children.
Auhea/Kekauluohi was also the step mother of Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha; Ruth Keelikolani; et. als.
Auhea/Kekauluohi was the true mother of William Charles Lunalilo/King Lunalilo, which means William Charles Lunalilo/King Lunalilo was the step sibling of Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha; et. als.
Auhea/Kekauluohi's last husband was Charles Kanaina which meant that Charles Kanaina was also the step father of All of Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's, Kamehameha III's children, step children, including Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha, Ruth Keelikolani, hanai/adopted Bernice Pauahi Bishop, et. als.
Many Kamehameha's heirs existed, and many successors existed. Ruth Keelikolani was not the only heir of Mataio Kekuanaoa, and Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha.
| Keʻelikōlani | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Her Highness | |||||
 |
|||||
| Spouse | William Pitt Leleiohoku I Isaac Young Davis |
||||
| Issue | John William Pitt Kīnaʻu Keolaokalani Davis William Pitt Leleiohoku II (hānai) |
||||
|
|||||
| House | House of Kamehameha | ||||
| Father | Kahalaiʻa Luanuʻu or Mataio Kekūanāoʻa |
||||
| Mother | Kalani Pauahi Kaʻahumanu & Kïnaʻu (hānai) |
||||
| Born | February 9, 1826 Honolulu, Oʻahu |
||||
| Died | May 24, 1883 (aged 56) Kailua-Kona, Hawaiʻi |
||||
| Burial | June 17, 1883 Mauna ʻAla Royal Mausoleum |
||||
1884 - Bernice Pauahi Bishop died. She was also called "the last of the Kamehameha's" but not so when one does genealogies. Many Kamehameha's existed, they were heirs and successors also existed.
| Bernice Pauahi Bishop | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||||
| Spouse | Charles Reed Bishop | ||||
| Issue | Keolaokalani Davis (hānai) | ||||
|
|||||
| Father | Abner Pākī Kekūanāoʻa (hānai) |
||||
| Mother | Laura Kōnia Kīnaʻu (hānai) |
||||
| Born | December 19, 1831 ʻAikupika, Haleākala, Honolulu,Oʻahu, Hawaii |
||||
| Died | October 16, 1884 (aged 52) Keōua Hale, Honolulu, Oʻahu,Hawaii |
||||
| Burial | November 2, 1884 [1]Mauna ʻAla Royal Mausoleum,Oʻahu, Hawaii |
||||
| Signature |  |
||||
1888 - The Judges said that the rules they made became law, and were documented treasonous persons during the reign of King David Kalakaua.
1891 - King David Kalakaua died. His mother was the hanai/adopted daughter of one of Kamehameha's heirs named Nahuina (w). She was the great great great grand daughter of Kamehameha. His mother Keohokalole was a permanent member of the House of Nobles. His sister was Kaeha/Kamakaeha/Makaeha/ Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani.
King David Kalakaua was one of Kamehameha III - successors.
| Kalākaua | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||||
| King of the Hawaiian Islands (more ...) | |||||
| Reign | February 12, 1874 — January 20, 1891 | ||||
| Investiture Coronation |
February 13, 1874, Kīnaʻu Hale February 12, 1883, ʻIolani Palace |
||||
| Predecessor | Lunalilo | ||||
| Successor | Liliʻuokalani | ||||
| Spouse | Kapiʻolani | ||||
|
|||||
| House | House of Kalākaua | ||||
| Father | Caesar Kapaʻakea | ||||
| Mother | Analea Keohokālole | ||||
| Born | November 16, 1836 Honolulu, Oahu |
||||
| Died | January 20, 1891 (aged 54) Palace Hotel, San Francisco |
||||
| Burial | February 15, 1891[1] Mauna Ala Royal Mausoleum |
||||
| Religion | Church of Hawaii | ||||
| Signature |  |
||||
Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's heirs and successors existed.
1893 - Queen Liliuokalani was criminally dethroned. Her mother was the hanai /adopted daughter of one of Kamehameha's heirs named Nahuina (w). She was the great great great great grand daughter of Kamehameha. Her mother Keohokalole was a permanent member of the House of Nobles.
Some of her children/ hanai children were Kalaniopuu's, Kamehameha's, and Kaumualii's descendants/ heirs, hanai/adopted children's descendants/heirs.
1897 - Opposition to Annexation documented by Queen Liliuokalani and about 40,000 subjects.
The U.S. could not annex the Hawaiian Islands. Therefore, the lies, deceptions continued and indoctrination, including disinformation was applied on the masses over and over again since the death of Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha, then his sister Ruth Keelikolani, and Bernice Pauahi Bishop.
1899 - In a court case of the First Circuit Court - Peacock vs. the Republic of Hawaii shows that the United States was one of a two-part government, the other part being the American Empire which included nations which were treated as less than those who had Treaties.
The Sandwich Islands was placed under the American Empire group. It appears that the indoctrination, perpetuation of lies, the disinformation conveyed to the people by treason operative Sanford B. Dole to disclaim the Kamehameha's continued.
Queen Liliuokalani, the Royal Families, and her subjects remained under duress, stress, usurpation, coercion, intimidation, etc.
Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's heirs and successors existed.
1915 - Queen Liliuokalani made Queen for a Day to celebrate Balboa Day or the Pan-Pacific Club. The purpose was to claim that Nations without Treaties would fall under the American Empire which recognized the Sandwich Islands as part of the Pacific area. Such small island nations were treated less than nations that had treaties.
1916 - Queen Liliuokalani was expected to sign an agreement with the Aero Club or the American military.
Note: Because Queen Liliuokalani and her subjects were under duress since 1893, all contracts are illegal and null and void which was
1917 - Queen Liliuokalani died. She was one of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's successors.
| Liliʻuokalani | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
|||||
| Queen of the Hawaiian Islands (more...) | |||||
| Reign | January 29, 1891 – January 17, 1893 | ||||
| Predecessor | Kalākaua | ||||
| Successor | Monarchy abolished | ||||
| Spouse | John Owen Dominis | ||||
|
|||||
| House | House of Kalākaua | ||||
| Father | Caesar Kapaʻakea | ||||
| Mother | Analea Keohokālole | ||||
| Born | September 2, 1838 Honolulu, Oahu, Kingdom of Hawaii |
||||
| Died | November 11, 1917 (aged 79) Honolulu, Oahu, Territory of Hawaii |
||||
| Burial | November 18, 1917 Mauna Ala Royal Mausoleum |
||||
| Religion | Church of Hawaii | ||||
| Signature | .svg){kind=small} |
||||
1950 - the United States Congress continued and perpetuated the lies that
Kamehameha V was the last of the Kamehameha's.
Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's heirs and successors existed.
Summary
The continued promotion and indoctrination of the lies were conveyed onto the people over time. Also see definition of indoctrination and methods of disinformation on the links below in the reference section.
Aside from the historical regualar doses of lies, criminal malfeasance, etc., promoted by the treasonous persons, supported by the Judicial system who were also treasonous, the truth prevails and has been uncovered with evidence.
Heavy doses and criminal application of "Indoctrination", "disinformation", premeditation to the public or the masses can be thrown aside when everyone becomes empowered with knowledge, and truth.
Additionally, duress on our Queen, our Royal Families, subjects of the Hawaiian Kingdom further nulls and voids all contracts, which means that contracts with the Balboa or Pan Pacific Club, as well as the Aero Club which involves the Army, military is also null and void.
The Royal Families exists, the heirs of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli and the successors exists and are and remain part of the 1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States of America which also helps to maintain the Constitution for the citizens as well.
The United States and American Empire are not the entities that can operate with neutral, friendly nations such as the Hawaiian Kingdom in a civilized society.
The Treaty of 1850 is with the United States of America.
Rents and Leases are due March 1, 2015. Our Hawaiian Kingdom Records from the Archives, Bureau of Conveyances, Department of Health records, Supreme Court/Court records up to the year 1893 is expected.
The private properties, trusts, etc. of our Royal Families includes all of Kamehameha III's - Kauikeaouli's private lands, which includes the Crown Lands, etc.
The Treasonous operations of the Kamehameha Schools, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates, Queen Liliuokalani Trust, OHA/Office of Hawaiian Affairs, Kanai-oloolo-walu/Kanaiolowalu, etc. are Pirates, Pillagers documented, and are not related to us. They are not part of our Royal Families.
Pirates, Pillagers listed and sent to President Obama has been sent from the Judicial Tribunal members who are also part of Kamehameha III's - Kauikeaouli's heirs and successors.
The American Consulate needs to be in place to take care of Americans occupying our neutral, non violent nation and the military needs to stop damaging, doing toxic weaponry on our lands, etc.
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhR36gV6vW4
carpenter - Bless the Beasts and the Children
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU3u5UDjYeY
Lotta Love - Nicolette Larson
References:
Search Results
- Duress has been defined as a "threat of harm made to compel a person to do something against his or her will or judgment; esp., a wrongful threat made by one person to compel a manifestation of seeming assent by another person to a transaction without real volition". - Black's Law Dictionary (8th ed.
Duress - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DuressWikipedia
duress legal definition of duress
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/duressDuress. Unlawful pressure exerted upon a person to coerce that person to perform an act that he or she ordinarily would not perform. Duress also encompasses ..
Indoctrination - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoctrination
Wikipedia
Indoctrination is the process of inculcating ideas, attitudes, cognitive strategies or a professional methodology (see doctrine). Indoctrination is a critical ...
Indoctrination | Define Indoctrination at Dictionary.com
dictionary.reference.com/browse/indoctrination
Dictionary.com
Indoctrination definition, the act of indoctrinating, or teaching or inculcating a doctrine, principle, or ideology, especially one with a specific point of view: religious ...
Indoctrinate - Merriam-Webster.com
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indoctrinate
Merriam‑Webster
verb in·doc·tri·nate \in-ˈdäk-trə-ˌnāt\. : to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group and to not consider other ideas, ..
Reference:
Updated 07/31/2014: Kamehameha III's Descendants/Heirs Exists..........Including Myself, Amelia Gora et. als.
Indoctrination - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoctrination
Wikipedia
Indoctrination is the process of inculcating ideas, attitudes, cognitive strategies or a professional methodology (see doctrine). Indoctrination is a critical ...
Indoctrination | Define Indoctrination at Dictionary.com
dictionary.reference.com/browse/indoctrination
Dictionary.com
Indoctrination definition, the act of indoctrinating, or teaching or inculcating a doctrine, principle, or ideology, especially one with a specific point of view: religious ...
Indoctrinate - Merriam-Webster.com
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indoctrinate
Merriam‑Webster
verb in·doc·tri·nate \in-ˈdäk-trə-ˌnāt\. : to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions, and beliefs of a particular group and to not consider other ideas, ..
It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.
This why concepts from the film, Wag-The-Dog, actually work. If you saw that movie, know that there is at least one real-world counterpart to Al Pacino's character. For CIA, it is Mark Richards, who was called in to orchestrate the media response to Waco on behalf of Janet Reno. Mark Richards is the acknowledged High Priest of Disinformation. His appointment was extremely appropriate, since the CIA was VERY present at Waco from the very beginning of the cult to the very end of their days - just as it was at the People's Temple in Jonestown. Richards purpose in life is damage control.
For such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known 'liar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it matters not who does the presenting or what their motives are, or if they have lied in the past or even if motivated to lie in this instance -- the facts or links would and should stand or fall on their own merit and their part in the matter will merely be supportive.
Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position, idea, or solution -- very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another role -- the role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of "higher standards" of discussion than necessarily warranted. They will demand that those presenting arguments or concepts back everything up with the same level of expertise as a professor, researcher, or investigative writer. Anything less renders any discussion meaningless and unworthy in their opinion, and anyone who disagrees is obviously stupid -- and they generally put it in exactly those terms.
So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological warfare operations) or trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the later freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or -- put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.) Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly known historical events, and a proper response. Accusations should not be overused -- reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational sidetracks, unless it is feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request (see permissions statement at end):
Next: DisinformationRule1.
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule1.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule2.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule3.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule4.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule5.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule6.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule7.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule8.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule9.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule10.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule11.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule12.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule13.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule14.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule15.shtml
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule16.shtml
Rules Of Disinformation Number 16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
Example: 'You can't say Paisley is still alive... that his death was faked and the list of CIA agents found on his boat deliberately placed there to support a purge at CIA. You have no proof. Why can't you accept the Police reports?' This is a good ploy, since the dental records and autopsy report showing his body was two inches too long and the teeth weren't his were lost right after his wife demanded inquiry, and since his body was cremated before she could view it -- all that remains are the Police Reports. Handy.
Proper response: There is no suitable response to actual vanished materials or persons, unless you can shed light on the matter, particularly if you can tie the event to a cover up other criminality. However, with respect to dialog where it is used against the discussion, you can respond... 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. The best you can say is that the matter is in contention ONLY because of highly suspicious matters such as the simultaneous and mysterious vanishing of three sets of evidence. The suspicious nature itself tends to support the primary allegation. Why do you refuse to address the remaining issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 16 - vanish evidence and witnesses)?'
http://maoliworld.ning.com/profiles/blogs/facts-and-clarity-of-hawaii-s-situation article by Tane Inciong (2015)
Replies