Note:
This article was copied at the Archives, Honolulu, Oahu, gotten out of Queen Liliuokalani's personal papers.
Note that the MORGAN bankers did criminally assume the taking of Hawaiian monies and became partners in Crime with the U.S. who did Premeditate the taking over of the PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION, etc. with evidence printed in the NEW YORK TIMES on January 9, 1893..........then the Military with their gatling guns left the Warship BOSTON on January 15, 1893 and the dethronement occurred on January 17, 1893 under duress, stress, usurpation, and coercion.
see below and other articles/posts/etc. by Amelia Gora --- researcher of the find below was Shane Lee:
PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION.; IMPERATIVE NECESSITY ...
Pearl Harbor is regarded by these maritime as the best site for a war-supply depot in the Pacific. Onoe secured by Jingluud. it places her principal station 2700 ...
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F00617FD345B1A738DDDA00894D9405B8385F0D3
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGKx2LNbF5M&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLB19400406A73917F
Replies
Hi again Amelia.
At the time of the 1848 Mahele 'Aina the reigning King (HRH Kamehameha III) claimed to be a Konohiki it is actually on the minutes of the Privy Council for December 11th of 1847 (87). Quote:
"The King now claims to be Konohiki (Chief) of a great portion of the lands. He therefore makes known to the other Konohikis that they are only holders of lands under him, but he will only take a part and leave them a part .... subject to the rights of the Tenants."
Yes, the Konohiki were often of Royal families more often they were of lower strata Ali'i. Kauieouli was not deliberately overlooked as the actual discussion context was do you happen to know of the specific Kingdom Legislation which would have prevented HRH Kalakaua in conjunction with the Privy Council from re-conveying a documented Mahele Award?
Klieger stated that specifically in the Report's outset it was an opinion, which we can agree Amelia is a belief of judgement that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. As to employer/handlers just a person off the street without handlers Jack of all trades & master of none ma ka hana ka 'ike.
A hui hou kaua. -Andrew.
http://archives1.dags.hawaii.gov/gsdl/cgi-bin/library see Mahele Book for the Konohiki (120 pages pdf)
The Konohiki were also given the fishing rights, etc.....Mountain to the Sea.
The land Commission was to exist for only 2 years.
Land Commission dissolved in 1853. They had handled 12,000 claims.
Time extended till dissolution on March 31, 1855.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Mahele
Land division (mahele) of 1848
Hoping to keep ownership of the land out of the hands of foreigners in the event of a political coup d'état, Kamehameha III and 245 chiefs met to divide the Hawaii lands among themselves.[3] The Mahele abolished the previous semi-feudal system. Under this, rule over an ahupuaʻa was given by the king to a chief, who received taxes and tribute from the people who worked the land collectively. Private land ownership did not exist, as a commoner could be expelled from his land by the chief, or the chief removed by the king.[6]
**************************************
The best descriptions would come out of the green books sitting on the shelves at the Archives, Honolulu, Oahu.
Intense research could be gotten from the Privy Council Files, etc.
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpTSA_25wGEAloha kaua e Amelia.
A small point from your "New York Times" article of January 1893 (above), quote:
"The main item of expense is the removal of a coral reef which is dead and when once dredged out will not reappear."
This begs the question as to whom exactly decided the coral reef was "dead," ? there were powerful vested interests involved here thanks to Major General J.M. Schofield and Col. B.S. Alexander's Report to the U.S. War Dept. after their two month spying sojourn in Hawai'i.
In 1894 Lt. W. M. Wood of the U.S. Navy whose team worked at Puuloa for 51 days on this particular bar commencing April 30th of that year stated:
"I was informed that no attempt had ever been made to determine the character of the bar and that estimates as to the cost of cutting it had hitherto been made without definite knowledge of the formation of the bar."
Source: http://digicoll.manoa.hawaii.edu/savedmaps/PDF/53rdCongressExec42.pdf
This obstruction at the entrance to Puuloa (Pearl Harbor) was a mile offshore, in 1900 it was dredged down to 35 feet, following further U.S. financial input dredging continued and in 1911 the first truly large ship the USS California entered the Harbor. Thus one of the most pristine Harbor's on Earth was lost to militarism.... no Sierra Club or EIS back in those times. -Aloha.
hi Andrew,
Thank you for pointing out some of the issues.
Pearl Harbor was a beautiful, pristine area filled with pearl bearing oysters.......apparently the pearls were gathered for personal use and trading purposes into the 1930's or before World War II with the high contamination reduced the area into sludge, toxins, etc.
In doing archaeology research for the area, I found that there were natural fishing traps placed there by our people..........there were various fishing styles as well.
The claims by the U.S. over Pearl Harbor was made due to a FRAUD deed signed by King David Kalakaua in 1876. Kalakaua deeded the area to Grace Kamaikui and Mataio Kekuanaoa - both of our ancestors.
Problem about the deed is that Grace Kamaikui died in 1866 and Mataio Kekuanaoa died in 1868.
Grace Kamaikui was awarded the Halawa Ahupuaa in the Mahele of 1848..........so how could Kalakaua reconvey an already documented Mahele award again. Kekuanaoa had been awarded a section as well but did not have the entire Halawa Ahupuaa.
The Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates figures in all of this, the move to PIRATE identities, genealogies, criminally assume what was not theirs and convey to the U.S., etc.
You've brought out some good points and the highlight is the criminal intrusion upon properties/ private properties of our Royal families.....reason being Grace Kamaikui was actually a cousin of Kauikeouli/ Kamehameha III because her grandfather was the brother of Kamehameha, father of Kauikeouli/ Kamehameha III. Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III did hanai her three children: Hueu, Kale, and Peke Davis.
Both Grace Kamaikui and Mataio Kekuanaoa have descendants/heirs, including our families.
Queen Liliuokalani's article which was preserved in her files over time is good evidence of the premeditation activities by the bankers who were the investors of the U.S., and England.
The U.S. Treaty would have expired in 1894..........there are numerous articles that shows that the U.S. had NO ownership to Pearl Harbor.....in other words, their claims are built on LIES, LIES, LIES documented.
During King Kalakaua's reign, it is documented that a U.S. Representative approached the House of Nobles for loans and wouldn't repay the full amount for thousands of years....only interest would be given.... The German Jews did give out loans and expected a 10% interest......what did they get? Many were killed due to Hitler into World War II..........the Jews are also directly connected in the International banks/Bank of England which funds both sides of WAR.......
The U.S. and England were bankrupt then and remain bankrupt now......CREEPS went after our Hawaiian monies..........which is on record......
the U.S., England were bankrupt due to the American Civil War costs and owed much to the International bankers.
It would be a cool combined effort by our kanaka maoli who are knowledgeable about the issues surrounding Pearl Harbor and do a book..........it would be a best seller and possibly a banned book too! lol........as i've found out that my books are banned by certain businesses dealing with the entity State of Hawaii.
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dOzAzLupoICecilio & Kapono - Sailin
Cecilio & Kapono at Aloha Tower Marketplace back in 2005. They held a 20 year reunion tour.
by whodaknew | 4 years ago | 69,864 views
Aloha Amelia.
In 1997 there was a publication on marine diversity at Wai-Momi (Pu'uloa) which exhibited maps from 1824-25, 1902, and 1920. You will find them if you scroll down to pages 11, 12, & 13 respectively. In the case of the latter circa 1920 map some of the many loko kuapa are still visible in the Harbor.
Please see: http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/pdf/PHReport.pdf
Interesting query on HRH King David Kalakaua authorization there was an agreement pertaining to Pearl Harbor signed by the King on October 29th of 1887 which had been ratified by the Kingdom Senate ...... must check further on the details of that! -A hui hou.
Hi Andrew,
The konohiki assigned to Halawa was Grace Kamaikui and a smaller part assigned to Mataio Kekuanaoa.
The Rights of the Konohiki could not be usurped even by King Kalakaua who was not an heir of Grace Kamaikui or Mataio Kekuanaoa.
The Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Trustees were the ones who transferred lands to the U.S. on record........see:
http://maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/rail-road-crossing-hits?com...
KNOW ABOUT PEARL HARBOR -- More Evidence for Genocide Case(s) against the entity Fake State, the U.S., etc.
Review by Amelia Gora, a Royal person, one of the owners of
the Halawa Ahupuaa, which includes Pearl Harbor (2011)
The Halawa Ahupuaa, includes Pearl Harbor was owned by Kamehameha's Haole advisor named John Young/Olohana, an Englishman who was also Kamehameha's cousin's husband.
John Young left a Will leaving his lands to his children and adopted children. Their names were James Young Kanehoa; Fanny Kekela; Grace Kamaikui; Gina Lahilahi; John Young Jr./Keoni Ana; and his adopted children and true grandchildren Hueu Davis; Kale Davis; and Peke Davis.
Grace Kamaikui was awarded with the Halawa Ahupuaa. Her children were Hueu Davis; Kale Davis; and Peke Davis. She was married to Isaac Davis who died in 1810, and married Dr. TCB Rooke who adopted Emma, one of Fanny's children.
There's much criminal activities in the transactions pertaining to the Trustees of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates, King David Kalakaua's Fraud Deed, and the transfers of land by one Lucy Peabody. (See previous articles posted here, in the IOLANI - The Royal Hawk, etc.)
The point is that the Halawa Ahupuaa belongs to Grace Kamaikui's descendants who existed then, and exists today.
Lucy Peabody, a treasonous person had much to do with the criminal transfers of properties which did not belong to her. The criminal deviants, treasonous persons such as the Trustees of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates and others also had a hand in supporting the criminal transfers to a foreign government who did not have the right to own lands in the Hawaiian Kingdom, especially since they are now on record as having premeditated the criminal moves on a Neutral, non-violent, friendly nation.
Our Queen Liliuokalani did record the U.S. as having breached the Laws of Nations, the records of Pearl Harbor listed below are further evidence of Premeditation, stress, duress, coercion, usurpation, genocide against our Hawaiian people, including the owners of the Halawa Ahupuaa, all Innocents in the Hawaiian Islands, affecting all Innocents around the World.
The U.S. and entity Fake State does not own Pearl Harbor, etc., the owners are Kamehameha III's/Kauikeouli's hanai/ adopted children's descendants.............rents, leases are due........questions: P.O. Box 861781, Wahiawa, Oahu, Hawaii:
PEARL HARBOR CHRONOLOGICAL INFORMATION - Reference: THE NEW YORK TIMES or nytimes.com :
1890 -
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F00911FF3E5F10738...
Editorial Article 7 -- No Title
[ DISPLAYING ABSTRACT ]
Some of the Haytians seem to be worried at the supposed designs entertained by the United States upon Mole St. Nicholas. They fancy that our Government is perilously bent on having this place as a naval and coaling station; and with that foothold gained they perhaps foresee the ultimate annexation of Hayti, and of San Domingo as well.
Note: This article will open in PDF format. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader or Learn More »
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70E10FB3D5E10738...3
*******************************
1891 -
FOREIGN COALING STATIONS.
[ DISPLAYING ABSTRACT ]
The negotiations which Admiral GHERARDI has been conducting with Haiti for securing to our country St. Nicholas Mole as a naval station are due to the generally recognized necessity of having such a foot-holding Gulf waters. This policy is quite distinct from a general mania for annexing territory, although it might in some cases pave the way to the latter, and has often been opposed on that ground.
Note: This article will open in PDF format. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader or Learn More »
****************************************************
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F50F1FFE385C17738...
********************************************************************
1892 -
TO BUY PEARL HARBOR.; PROBABLE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COALING STATION NEAR HONOLULU.
[ DISPLAYING ABSTRACT ]
The first paragraph is not available for this article.
Note: This article will open in PDF format. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader or Learn More »
Log in to see what your friends are sharing on nytimes.com. Privacy Policy | What’s This?
1893 - Jan. 9. and 7 days before the criminal dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani.
*article found by researcher Shane Lee.
PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION.; IMPERATIVE NECESSITY THAT THE UNITED STATES TAKE POSSESSION.
[ DISPLAYING ABSTRACT ]
WASHINGTON, Jan. 8. -- The United States, through the inactivity of the Navy Department and the indifference of the State Department, is likely to lose the only coaling station of which it stands in real need. Nothing has been done since 1884, when the Pearl Harbor site in the Hawaiian Islands became available, beyond a number of surveys which have abundantly demonstrated the excellence of this harbor as a site for a naval station.
Note: This article will open in PDF format. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader or Learn More »
The Rights of the Konohiki:
Search Results
Next
Project Description
Now that Native Hawaiians are returning to the ¢aina, the time is ripe for the issue of konohiki rights to be revisited because if reinstated, konohiki could have the ...
§187A-23 Konohiki rights. (a) The fishing grounds from the reefs ...
Konohiki Days of Maunalua Bay by | Lawaia Magazine ...
Konohiki Rights
Konohiki Fishing Rights - Green Magazine Hawaii
Traditional native approaches to ocean governance
Water Rights Laws in the Nineteen Western States - Google Books Result
Ancient water rights.-{\) Ahupuaas and ilis kupono. A royal grant of an ahupuaa to a konohiki carried with it all natural resources thereon except what the ...
Hāʻena: through the eyes of the ancestors - Google Books Result
Land or fishing rights under the control of the konohiki are also sometimes called konohiki rights (Pukui and Elbert 1986). However, by breaking the word down ...
Konohiki - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster ...
Search Help Give us feedback
************************************************
This is part of a Legal Notice posted which includes info from Tane.........fyi....the treaty that you're talking about appears to be in here also:
A CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY "IN REM" CLAIMS SOME:The following was posted by Tane on Maoliworld.com This is his take:
It's simpler to refer to the Constitution of 1864 which is still basically in effect. The reason being that the 1887 was
never ratified but implied; Legislation was out of session at the time; the Queen attempted to restore it; it was still a
Constitutional Monarchy whereas the Bayonet Constitution of 1887 was done under duress which makes it null and
void; 1887 stripped her powers which means her veto power was nil.
She proposed the new constitution to restore the rights of the citizens and redeem the powers of the monarch enjoyed
by Lot. Her muhe'e cabinet had double-crossed her once she intended to promugate the illicit constitution and told
her to hold off. When the people gathered, she told them to be patient as she could not promulgate the Bayonet
constitution and introduce the new one which she felt had to have the approval and support of her cabinet to go
through the proper protocols as was done in 1864.
4
As far as the Kawananakoas, they are collateral relations to Queen Kapiolani who was not head of state. Queen
Regnant Lili'uokalani had the Crown Princess Kaiulani confirmed by the legislature as as successor dictated by the
constitutions. Under the Constitutions, the criteria was established on succession and eligibility of successors. Today
there would be an election as the two previous Kings were elected to the throne.
There is a catch-22 we are faced with today. The marriages had to be approved by the Monarch; if not, the eligible
would be cut from the line of succession as if he/she were dead. One could not be an idiot; and it was important for the
candidate to be above reproach and groomed as well as educated through the proper process of schooling befit for a
monarch.
Kauikeaouli had set up the pool of eligibles. None had direct descendants except for Abigail Maheha whose
decendants are still living. Nonetheless, the pool would then be open to ALL colaterals of high birth; Hawaiian system
relied on who is the mother and who is the father which determined the rank of the offspring.
On top of that, illegitimate/bastard children under the Christian guidelines that influenced the "legitimacy" of
successors as written in the constitutions, would be cut from the line as if dead and become ineligible.
So, do we set a precedent?
To answer your initial question, we can refer to the treaties ratified by over 20-25 countries including the U.S.A. which
establishes within their Constitution that ratified treaties are the Supreme law of the land. The U.S. have admitted to their
complicity by invading and conspiring to unlawfully takeover the Kingdom of Hawai'i.
Under International law, such admittance deems the invasion, a belligerent occupation with a civilian arm to govern. The U.S.
continues to violate the laws of occupation and the laws of neutrality. International law experts have declared that the
Kingdom still exists.
The Queen's formal protest, the memorial along with the Ku'e Petitions of 1897 led to the treaty of annexation to be rejected
by the U.S. Congress. Within the Turpie Resolution of 1894, it allowed the people to determine and maintain their own
governance and political policy, hence the petitions that wasgiven to U.S. Congress in 1897.
The U.S. joint resolution, considered not binding but a declaration, is null and void in a foreign country since it is outside of
their jurisdiction and any other subsequent action within that foreign country has no standing according to international law
and the laws within the U.S.A.'s constitution.
While the U.S. government considered Hawaii as4a:U.S. territory, the world including U.S. Americans recognized us as a
foreign country and under NGO status. I knew I was a Hawaii national/citizen since I was about 8 years old.
The Constitutional Monarchy of the Kingdom of Hawai'i still exists but in rem.
Third Point ............
There are problematic cases affecting our Royal families:
* Estate of Kekauluohi (1876) - Flaws in genealogy(ies)/heirs, etc.
Reference: Volume 6 Hawaii Reports
* Thurston vs. Bishop (1888) Opinions of the Court on land, konohiki laws, etc.
Reference: Volume 7 Hawaii Reports
* Bishop vs. Gulick (1889) Bishop Estates trustees become heirs.
Reference: Volume 7 Hawaii Reports
* Estate of Brenig (1889) Samuel Maikai claimed heir and Estate of Bernice Pauahi
Bishop case used as precedence.
Ref: Volume 7 Hawaii Reports
5
* Hawaiian Government vs. Cartwright (1890) Government lien on private lands of Kamehameha IV, etc.
Reference: Volume 8 Hawaii Reports
* In Re Sheldon (1893) Discussion of changeover from provisional government to Republic because provisional governments
last only 2 years
Reference: Volume 9 Hawaii Reports
* Rooke v. Queen's Hospital (1899) Note: TCB Rooke's heir C Rooke, a nephew and his heirs forever
Reference: Volume 12 Hawaii Reports
* In the Matter of....Pa Pelekane (1912) Note: Territory as successor the Hawaiian Kingdom
Reference: Volume 21 Hawaii Reports
*also see the Corporation Documents for the Queen's Hospital which documents Kamehameha IV as the perpetual trustee
allowing free health care to our kanaka maoli, sailors, and others. Note: This is the reason(s).why a change was made
eliminating sailors and others - issued a null and void order previously as a descendant of Peke Davis, whose mother was
Grace Kamaikui and both were the hanai/adopted children of Kauikeaouli/Kamehameha 111.
Reference: Archives, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii
*also note that the Bonds of the Hawaiian Kingdom is criminally utilized currently by the entity State of Hawaii to pay for the
Judges salaries, homes for many including foreigners discovered by some of the Sovereignty groups.
Additionally, kanaka maoli/aboriginal Hawaiians/Hawaiian nationals prisoners are released from prisons/jail if they sign an
interest over to the entity State of Hawaii in exchange for their release.
Reference: Credible sources.
Fourth Point ..........
Is it true that the Hawaiian Kingdom government lies in the Royal Order of Kamehameha?
I leave you with these questions:
Why did the military approach the Royal Order of Kamehameha for approval to use depleted uranium/DU? ......... . .. .. . and did
you know they accommodated and approved?
Why did Daniel Inouye/Senator Daniel Inouye, one armed bandit, invite all of the Royal Societies....the Royal Order of
Kamehameha, the Kaahumanu Society, the Sons and Daughter of Hawaii (a Missionary society), etc. to a meeting and asked
for their approval in claiming all of downtown Honolulu, Nuuanu, etc. as a Memorial? ..... and did you know they
accommodated and approved?
Well, this article documents oppositions to the U.S. Military, Daniel Inouye/Senator Daniel Inouye moves to gain approval
from the Royal Societies without the approval of the descendants and heirs of the lands.
Lastly, the entity State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu, Inouye, et. als. are not related to our families, and perpetuate
the frauds of those who conspired against our families, our people, and wrongfully/criminally assumed a neutral, non-violent,
friendly nation.
Eviction notices have been served to the U.S. military via U.S. President Obama, entity State of Hawaii Governor Lingle,
Attorney General, NRA/Nuclear Regulatory Agency, Jim Albertini, Isaac Harp, Luwella Leonardi, and to all whom it may
concern.
Oppositions to all the above discovered criminal activities are hereby documented. All wrongdoing must cease.
Fraud/deceit/criminal malfeasance, criminal moves/claims promoted and perpetuated by the U.S., Congress, military, entity
6
State of Hawaii, City and Counties (Honolulu, Maui, Molokai, Hawaii, Kauai, Niihau, etc.) current claims are without
jurisdiction/ legal jurisdiction. Continued claims by pirates, occupiers, belligerent occupiers are without jurisdiction/legal
jurisdiction, including further claims made by conspirators, treasonous persons since 1893 are null and void on this day,
March 5, 2010.
Sincerely,
Amelia Gora, a Royal person, Acting Liaison of
Foreign Affairs, Royal families House of Nobles,
Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/ Hawaiian
Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/He Mokupuni Pae
Aina o Hawaii, a living human being
Revised LEGAL NOTICE
2010/03/06-Limited Appearance Statement from Amelia Gora on LB ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Mar 6, 2010 – from Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Amelia Gora ... rights for our people as well which also limited the rights of the foreigners (including those .... Bishop (1888) Opinions of the Court on land, konohiki laws, etc. ...
Find more Hawaiian Nation songs at Myspace Music
aloha.