http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/u/us-hi_1.gif"/> 
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZwXcWrQYVqsGKYfgXIctnzzRokGbLegvFQYz3qbA8Sz62ikM6"/> - Re:
Greetings,
Who owns the Federal Reserve?
The Federal Reserve System fulfills its public mission as an independent entity within government. It is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution.
As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the Congress of the United States. It is considered an independent central bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms.
However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by the Congress, which often reviews the Federal Reserve's activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as "independent within the government" rather than "independent of government."
The 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks, which were established by the Congress as the operating arms of the nation's central banking system, are organized similarly to private corporations--possibly leading to some confusion about "ownership." For example, the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks.
However, owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan; dividends are, by law, paid to member banks at a maximum rate of 6 percent, determined in part by each member bank's total assets."
The Alexander & Baldwin Corporation with the Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates has a subsidiary called A & B, Inc. which utilizes the UCC/Uniform Commercial Code with the Jurisdiction: Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii / Sovereign Kingdom of Hawaii.
The Trustees, investors includes some of the Federal Reserves "Families" documented above.
The point is that this is yet another issue of Identity theft, piracy, pillaging, racketeering by Aliens/foreigners who are Not the Superior Title owners, the Alodio /Ano Alodio owners in the Kingdom of Hawaii.
Overview
The A & B Inc. utilizes the "Jurisdiction of Organization" as the Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii according to the UCC Financing Statement filed by "The Kingdom of Hawaii Ministry Trust" under Doc No(s) 2007-192179 dated October 31, 2007
The A & B Inc. is a Sham, identity thief set up aligned with the State of Hawaii which evolved from the Territory of Hawaii created the the Army, Navy, and Federal officials.
The difference of this set up is that the UCC/Uniform Commercial Corporation supported by the Federal Reserves was allowed in using another jurisdiction contrary to American Jurisdiction.
The move to Pirate, Pillage, create and promote fraud, racketeering is seen here.
The Corporation created by Alexander and Baldwin were entitled to only Fee Simple or Lease lands and are Not the true Alodio/Ano Alodio owners.
Alexander and Baldwin were listed in the Judicial Tribunal list utilizing Article XIV of the 1849/1850 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America.
See the following 1851 Speech by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli who documented that he ratified the 1849/ 1850 Treaty in 1850.
Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli also made it clear that Alodio/Ano Alodio deeds were to his people, kanaka maoli and to aliens they were allowed Fee Simple only.
Alexander & Baldwin which began a Corporation were Aliens and cannot own Alodio/Ano Alodio lands. Therefore, they are Not the Superior title owners of the 87,000 + acres that they have written about.
The following are the Chronological events showing Identity Theft of our neutral, friendly, non-violent nation:
EXPOSING THE FRAUDS OF IDENTITY THIEVES IN THE
Kingdom of Hawaii
by Amelia Gora (2016)
The following Chronological listing shows the frauds, the criminal evidence documented by those utilizing the identity thieving of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation known as the Kingdom of Hawaii/ Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/ Hawaii:
1883 - Ruth Keelikolani died. She was one of the heirs of Kamehameha V - Lot Kamehameha who was one of the heirs of his father, sister, et. als. - Mataio Kekuanaoa who was the heir of his daughter Victoria Kamamalu.
Note: Ruth Keelikolani's heir was her cousin, hanai/adopted sister Bernice Pauahi Bishop.
Ruth's Power of Attorney was Kalaikini (w), last wife of Ruth's stepbrother named John Kapena who was also the first of the four Supreme Court Judges of the Kingdom of Hawaii appointed by his son-in-law Kamehameha III- Kauikeaouli who married his daughter Kekualoa/Kekua (w). Her brother was Keawe who married Peke Davis, daughter of Isaac Davis and Kamaikui, daughter of John Young/Olohana.
Kalaikini (w) married one of Kamehameha III's children named Opunui. Opunui was the hanai/adopted son of Keawe who also married Pauahi (w).
Charles Reed Bishop became Ruth's Power of Attorney.
Bernice Pauahi Bishop was not the only Alodio/Ano Alodio owner.
1884 - Bernice Pauahi Bishop died. Her next of kin on Probate was Kalola (w) - our ancestor, and life interest to Charles Reed Bishop, banker, lawyer, Trustee for William Lee, et. als.
Note: Bernice Pauahi Bishop was criminally claimed to be the "last of the Kamehameha's", a lie started by Pirate of the Pacific Charles Reed Bishop and Friends - Sanford B. Dole, et. als. The Trustees of Bernice Pauahi Bishop claimed to be the owners under the Will of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, and held ano alodio lands. The Trustees were not related to the Ano Alodio/Alodio lands title owner nor were they the heirs and successors of Kamehameha, and could only use Fee Simple, less than Alodio claims.
Bernice Pauahi Bishop's heirs included other Kamehameha's/other relatives such as Kalola (w) whose father was the brother of Abner Paki married to Konia.
The Trustees were Aliens who could only claim a less than Alodio fee simple title, a life interest title.
Other issues include the fact that Charles Reed Bishop's family were placed as heirs to the Trusts such as Bernice Pauahi Dunham, ancestor of current U.S. President Obama.
Queen Liliuokalani was the hanai/adopted daughter of Abner Paki and Konia (w). She along with many others were defrauded by Pirates of the Pacific Charles Reed Bishop and Friends.
1893 - Premeditation to take over the Kingdom of Hawaii documented. Queen Liliuokalani was wrongfully dethroned by Aliens, those who could only own Fee Simple, less than Alodio titles, their helpers included others who were paid off supporters who accepted $50 - $500 for their services. They were documented treasonous persons.
1897 - Opposition to Annexation was made by Queen Liliuokalani and her 40,000 (approximately) subjects.
1899 - The United States of America became two (2) nations: The United States and the American Empire.
Reference: Peacock vs. Republic of Hawaii case (1899), HAWAIIAN REPORTS, Supreme Court Law Library/Main Library/Archives, Honolulu, Oahu
1900 - the Army, Navy, and Federal officials helped to develop the Territory of Hawaii.
1912 - The Territory claimed to be the "successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii" see PA PELEKANE case (1912), Volume 21, HAWAIIAN REPORTS, at the Supreme Court Law Library/Main Library/Archives, Honolulu, Oahu.
1915 - Queen Liliuokalani was put on the throne for a day to recognize the Pan Pacific Flag Day and made to sign illegal contracts, etc.
Note: The Pan Pacific group became the Hawaii Tourism Authority for money making ventures by the usurpers.
1917 - Queen Liliuokalani died. She maintained that she did not sign a Trust Deed with the usurpers - Samuel Damon, Curtis Iaukea et. als.
1918 - The Pan Pacific group allowed themselves to purchase lands in the Hawaiian Islands.
Note: Aliens could not own Alodio lands in the Hawaiian Islands as documented by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli. He did Not want foreigners to live on his personal lands.
1929 - The Alodio Deeds and the Fee Simple Deeds were merged and documented to be "an Alodio title in Fee Simple" by Land Commissioner Bailey, a former Judge in his introduction of the INDICES OF AWARDS showing the Mahele Deeds of the Kingdom of Hawaii.
1952 - The UCC/Uniform Commercial Code was put in place by the Federal Reserves.
1959 - U.S. President Eisenhower signed an Executive Order making the Territory of Hawaii a State.
Oppositions were documented by Harold Abel Cathcart one of Kamehameha's descendants and heirs.
1980 - OHA/Office of the Hawaiian Affairs created.
1993 - Public Law 103-150 was signed by U.S. President William Clinton apologizing for the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani. It was an Admission of crimes by the United States for the criminal takeover of a neutral, friendly nation.
Note: Legal Notice posted stating that the Apology was Not accepted.
1996 - Affidavit/Lien filed (281 pages) No. 96-177455 filed on 12/17/96 with genealogies, history, laws, evidence of frauds including former Governor Poindexter who utilized Lot Kamehameha's signature - he became Kamehameha V - who signed an open ended document allowing the sugar companies to use Crown lands, water rights, etc.
Note. CW Ashford, Attorney General, claimed that the document was legal and approved it more than 50 years After the death of Kamehameha V.
Fraud, piracy, pillaging, racketeering documented.
2001 article showing the Overview of A & B, Inc., part owner KSBE/Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates, Queen Emma Trust, Queen Liliuokalani Trust etc. at the following link:
Landlocked | Hawaii Business Magazine
2007 - Alexander & Baldwin which is owned in part by Kamehameha Schools/KSBE/ Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates formed the A&B, Inc. which utilizes the "Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii" as the "Jurisdiction of Organization" in the UCC Financing Statement with Doc No 2007-192179 filed on October 31, 2007 initially filed on 10/29/2007 6:46 PM. (Note Time - after work hour ending at normally 4:30 PM!)
2008 - The Royal Families, part of Bernice Pauahi Bishop's Family with Alodio/Ano Alodio Titles met and reformed the House of Nobles - Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/ He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaii.
Various members were elected into positions:
Also, as the Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, I did null and void that illegal contract, along with other illegal contracts such as Hawaiian Homes, etc.
The illegal State of Hawaii sued our families in court over the Crown Lands.
Reminder: There's No Statutes of Limitations when it comes to FRAUD.
Research incomplete.
Informing many because..............
Something STINKS...............(.and I know it's NOT ME) WICKED TO THE MAX!
aloha.
This is a reminder that our Royal Families exists and we deny that the Territory of Hawaii which claimed to be the "successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii" which was developed by the Army, Navy, and Federal officials, became the State of Hawaii through the Executive Order of U.S. President Eisenhower with oppositions every step of the way has a status of a non-government because of identity theft documented.
Additionally, the recent find that the A & B, Inc. part of the Alexander & Baldwin Corporation with the Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trust, etc. are claiming to be the Sov. Kingdom of Hawaii/Sovereign Kingdom of Hawaii yet another Identity Theft, fraud, criminal racketeering to assume lands, assets, monies, mineral rights, etc. in the Hawaiian Islands.
The Treaty of 1849/1850 ratified by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli and the United States of America continues because our Royal Families are heirs and successors of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli and deny that Aliens/ foreigners are heirs and successors of our Royal Families.
Rents are Due and Owed for the Use of Our Families/Royal Families, et. als. Private Properties Wrongfully and Criminally claimed by the documented Identity Thieves as shown above.
The following regarding Treaties applies:
Application of the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America: Some Evidence Documented
- A Review -
Compiled by Amelia Gora (2016)
The Kingdom of Hawaii was wrongfully, criminally plundered upon by a Nation who did treaty with our Sovereign, Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli who set up the Alodio/Ano Alodio System for his heirs and his people. To Aliens/foreigners he allowed a Fee Simple. Furthermore, he did not wish for foreigners to own his private lands.
"The Court ruled in favor of the British plaintiff, holding that the treaty removed any bar to recovery created by Virginia law. Justice Cushing wrote that under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty “overrules all State laws upon the subject.”33 The other Justices agreed on this point,34 including Justice Iredell, who dissented on other grounds.35 Although Marshall argued eloquently on behalf of the losing defendants,36 he never challenged the consensus view that under the Supremacy Clause, the treaty displaced any state law inconsistent with U.S. treaty obligations."
"The Court held that judicial action was the appropriate means to implement the treaty because the combination of the treaty and the Supremacy Clause obligated state courts to “execute” the U.S. treaty obligation by ordering American debtors to pay their debts to British creditors."
" Marshall’s speech set forth his views about the allocation of constitutional responsibility for treaty implementation among the three branches of the federal government.52 In brief, Marshall believed that all government officers have a duty to execute treaties, insofar as they can do so by acting within the scope of authority granted under domestic law."
Marshall explained this position as follows: “[The President] is charged to execute the laws. A treaty is declared to be a law. He must then execute a treaty, where he . . . possesses the means of executing it.”60 Since Article 27 had the force of law under the Supremacy Clause, and the President had a duty under Article II to execute the law, the President had a duty to execute Article 27, at least in cases where Congress had not specified some other mechanism for treaty implementation.
"Republicans also argued that Article 27 required judicial, not executive implementation.61 In response, Marshall emphasized the distinction between a case “carried before a court as an individual claim” and a case “brought before the Executive as a national demand.”62 The Robbins case was “in its nature a national demand made upon the nation. The parties were the two nations. They cannot come into court to litigate their claims, nor can a court
decide on them. Of consequence, the demand is not a case for judicial cognizance.”63 A treaty-related claim falls within the scope of judicial competence where parties “come into court, who can be reached by its process, and bound by its power . . . to which they are bound to submit.”64 Since the real parties in interest in the Robbins case were two sovereign powers, and they were not bound to submit to judicial authority, the case fell outside the scope of judicial competence."
"B. Application of the Two-Step Approach in Foster and Percheman In Foster v. Neilson, 90 Marshall penned the following words, which have come to be associated with the doctrine of non-self-executing treaties: Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department; and the legislature must execute the contract before it can become a rule for the Court.91"
"Executory treaty provisions require the nation to undertake affirmative steps to fulfill its treaty commitments, whereas executed treaty provisions “require no further act to be done.”114"
"The Clause specifies that “all Treaties” are “the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”173 Read literally, the text seems to say that all treaties are directly binding on state governments. This interpretation is broadly consistent with the original understanding of the Supremacy Clause. Although commentators disagree about the original understanding, they generally agree that the Framers included treaties in the Supremacy Clause to make treaties binding on state government officers under domestic law.174 There are two problems, though, with a literal interpretation of the Supremacy Clause. First, the Constitution prohibits federal lawmakers from “commandeering” state legislatures or state executive officers.175"
"It is well established that “a State must afford to all individuals a meaningful opportunity to be heard if it is to fulfill the promise of the Due Process Clause.”208 Writing for the Court in 1876, Justice Field expressed the principle as follows: Wherever one is assailed in his person or his property, there he may defend, for the liability and the right are inseparable. This is a principle of natural justice, recognized as such by the common intelligence and conscience of all nations. A sentence of a court pronounced against a party without hearing him, or giving him an opportunity to be heard, is not a judicial determination of his rights, and is not entitled to respect in any other tribunal.209"
" Absent action by the federal political branches, though, the Supreme Court has a duty to apply the Supremacy Clause as written. Under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty is binding on state government officers if the treaty imposes non-discretionary duties on the United States under international law, state officers have the capacity to promote or hinder treaty performance, and application of treaty duties to state officers would not violate the anti-commandeering rule. The Clause applies both to treaties that delegate decisionmaking authority to international tribunals and those that do not. Whether, and in what circumstances, a treaty is judicially enforceable against state officers is a separate issue. This article does not analyze the myriad issues associated with judicial enforcement of treaties that are binding on state government officers under domestic law. However, the article does identify a narrow set of cases in which the Due Process Clause mandates judicial enforcement of treaties. When the state threatens to impose criminal sanctions on someone, and that person claims the sanction would violate a treaty-based, non-discretionary duty, the Due Process Clause requires a judicial hearing on the merits, provided the individual raises the argument at the first available opportunity in accordance with established procedural rules. State and federal judicial decisions in Medellin probably violated the petitioner’s constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause."
Reference: http://www.harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/HLI103.pdf
REVIEW
The Supreme Court is mandated "to apply the Supremacy Clause as written" in all court cases in the Hawaiian Islands.
"Absent action by the federal political branches, though, the Supreme Court has a duty to apply the Supremacy Clause as written. Under the Supremacy Clause, a treaty is binding on state government officers if the treaty imposes non-discretionary duties on the United States under international law, state officers have the capacity to promote or hinder treaty performance, and application of treaty duties to state officers would not violate the anti-commandeering rule. The Clause applies both to treaties that delegate decisionmaking authority to international tribunals and those that do not. Whether, and in what circumstances, a treaty is judicially enforceable against state officers is a separate issue. This article does not analyze the myriad issues associated with judicial enforcement of treaties that are binding on state government officers under domestic law. However, the article does identify a narrow set of cases in which the Due Process Clause mandates judicial enforcement of treaties. When the state threatens to impose criminal sanctions on someone, and that person claims the sanction would violate a treaty-based, non-discretionary duty, the Due Process Clause requires a judicial hearing on the merits, provided the individual raises the argument at the first available opportunity in accordance with established procedural rules. State and federal judicial decisions in Medellin probably violated the petitioner’s constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause."
The Courts, etc. from an Identity Theft basis/Sham set-up/a Non-government entity
Because the United States did premeditate the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, set up the Territory disregarding the Opposition to Annexation of Queen Liliuokalani and her subjects numbering 40,000, and with the aid of the Army, Navy, and Federal officials developed the Territory and falsely claimed that the the "Territory was the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii", the United States violated the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and the the Supremacy Clause, violated their own citizens when they signed the illegal banker's Constitution, created a two government system called the United States, and the American Empire, instead of the United States of America, looted, pirated a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation and utilized monies, lands, assets, mineral rights, etc. for the purpose of Wars with other innocent nations...........the U.S., the bankers in the Hawaiian Islands needs to take their identity thieves, their pirates, current pirate operatives including the governor, judges, United States Minister of Interior, gun carrying Police officers, Sheriffs, Department of Land and Natural Resources officers, et. als. with them according to the 1849 Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America.
Injuries were made on all non-treasonous kanaka maoli, Hawaii's Royal Families, and innocent subjects of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Injuries includes genocide activities, the deliberate incarceration of land owners on Kalaupapa, leper colonies, introducing small pox into the populations, etc.
Alodio/Ano Alodio, Superior titles to lands are held by those kanaka maoli documented in the Mahele books, validated by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1848. Aliens were given Fee Simple/less than alodio/life interest only.
The United States of America paid for Fee Simple conveyances by those who had only Fee Simple titles or had no titles to convey.
The United States of America/United States/American Empire must pay rents, remove toxic containers such as the fuel storage buildings, etc. in Halawa Valley, Oahu, removal of depleted uranium materials, missiles, etc stored and used at Pohakuloa, Hawaii, Schofield Barracks, Wahiawa,Oahu, etc. and eventually face the Tribunals for all Nations who were wrongfully plundered upon through the funds gotten from the pirating of assets of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation for the purposes of Wars/Business of Wars.
The above is additional supporting evidence which is added to the following:
- 4:30
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_8sMMjpVUak/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=eksVeetv0ckf8J6DvC25pFiMaIs"/>
- 23:44
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WCoOTEHq2Fo/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=FzAmOYd-rvpZBTdWVhhVx4_di98"/>
World Bank Whistleblower makes Startling Confession Karen Hudes
- 2 years ago
- 34,011 views
Karen Hudes exposes The World Bank. Source: Next News Network' channelhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJwJENSGnhE ... - 23:25
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5P2pAS05BOU/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=nEIjU3gDGYQl18ZH-2ng7Q0EK58"/>
Karen Hudes - World Bank in Collusion with the Jesuits.
- 2 years ago
- 29,231 views
Source: Greg Hunter' channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHVgRgYdCsQ The Federal Reserve and the Bank for ...
- Delet
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fjELyim8q80/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=BwRN9Ckx5W_1vzhMj5X31hZa2RU" height="110"/>
No Treaty- No Law- No Land
- 2 years ago
- 3,086 views
A video about the present day plundering of the Kingdom of Hawaii.10:41https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_2dfm7MeXfM/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=15CNLMo8KGdujCDxioUKRytB7Kg" alt=""/>
Ohikilolo 00015
Pono Kealoha and many more films with Kilikina Kekumano- 28:31
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4jvP_ik7bQo/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=NwTzQnDaYGToEnDujSXmhDPex4Q" height="110" alt="" width="196"/>
The Sovereignty Conversations Na Maka, Williamson Chang
- 6 months ago
- 251 views
In this Episode we have a re-cap with Juanita and Professor Williamson Chang on the Department of the Interiorʻs Native ... - 25:52
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EIOh5KMqXfA/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=fTXqnsAiVGgH-fnl7SMhYxo9574" height="110" alt="" width="196"/>
50th State Fraud - A Visit With Williamson Chang
- 1 year ago
- 5,499 views
http://VoicesOfTruthTV.com - Imagine the surprise University Of Hawai`i Professor Williamson Chang got when he discovered the ... - 31:36
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PkUxPlwombA/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=xsBS9-w8Lqwu9Iznmoc9wspFHn8" height="110" alt="" width="196"/>
Aloha ʻĀina Speaker Series: Hawaiian Independence & Governance ...
- 2 months ago
- 94 views
Hawaiian Independence & Governance: A discussion of the past and future of the nation of Hawaiʻi. PART THREE: Professor ...8:34https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FR-LfOBvhXs/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=-mdU3HmjuMYs_iD3H88gnH06Rzw"/>
Tribunal 001
- 1 year ago
- 262 views
This is a brief summary of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina activities.,...we have been behind the scenes for a long time ...Other references:theiolani.blogspot.com read all 606 issues posted since 2006aloha.
Additional reminders:
"Privateering is, and remains, abolished....the abolition of privateering is in the same spirit; but it is one of those reforms which must be thorough and compete to be equal. Privateering is legalized piracy, undoubtedly; but so is any maritime war directed against private property. It is just as much legalized piracy for a seventy-four gun ship to capture a merchantman, as it is for a long, low, black schooner, under the authorized commission of the same power to do the same thing."
Reference: "The Maritime Law of Nations", THE PACIFIC COMMERCIAL ADVERTISER, Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands, July 31, 1856.
Rents and past rents are due for the Private properties of our Royal Families who are the Alodio/ Ano Alodio owners, the Superior Title owners, and who are the Landlords with Landlord Liens on all of the Alii properties.
The State of Hawaii, A & B, Inc. a subsidiary of Alexander & Baldwin, Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates are Not related to our Royal Families and cannot own Alodio Titles awarded to our people only. The State of Hawaii, A & B, Inc. a subsidiary of Alexander & Baldwin, Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates are Aliens/foreigners who did move to pirate, pillage, fraudulently claim, did privateering acts now documented.
Rents are due/past due for our Alodio lands which includes Pearl Harbor, Halawa, Honouliuli, Moanalua, Kapalama, Waikiki, Honolulu, etc. This includes the rail ways which will also need to pay tolls, etc.
Additional Interests Due
The Kamehameha Trusts, etc.
The "Coins of the Realm", gold bullions, mineral rights, water rights, etc. belongs to our Royal Families and our kanaka maoli, not the identity thieves now documented.
The removal of toxins including the jet fuel tanks in Halawa, depleted uranium, GMO's, etc. are also expected.
The American Consulate rather than the unauthorized entities. documented identity thieves utilizing our neutral, friendly, non-violent nation may operate in its place until review and contract is made with the House of Nobles, etc.
Illegal contracts made after the wrongful dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani since 1893 will be null and voided. This includes the Land Court System, the Hawaiian Homes contracts conveying leases from the Crown Lands wrongfully claimed as ceded lands, etc.
Political prisoners in the Hawaiian Islands and those sent abroad will need to be reviewed and released, etc.
Taxes of our Royal Families, kanaka maoli lands, etc. are not owed to your government because there is No Treaty of Annexation, identity thieves,frauds, pirates, pillagers, privateers, genocide activists, racketeering entities claiming lands, monies, mineral rights, etc. that they have no right to.
Jury trials, penalties, fines for those who created, perpetuated fraud, crimes in the Hawaiian Islands, created sham setups, have identity thieved our Royal Families, the Kingdom of Hawaii government created by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's rules, laws, Constitution, etc.
Rents Due, Water Costs Due, etc.
Rents are due for the use of our Private Properties, Government lands of the Kingdom of Hawaii - includes Mauna Kea, etc, including monies due for the use of our water rights, etc.
We deny that the Federal Reserves entity are related to our Royal Families, etc. nor do they have a right to collect revenue from the true/de jure Kingdom of Hawaii Royal Families or subjects/supporters, etc.
We remain a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation with evidence documenting criminal setups, piracy(ies), pillaging, genocide activities ongoing, privateering, racketeering, etc. by those who are Not related to our Royal Families,
Further use of our identities cannot be made. Our Treaties remain the supreme laws of the land according to the U.S. Constitution in place from 1849/1850.
We are open to a discussion(s) with an invited audience.
e-mail: theiolani@gmail.com
or write: P.O. Box 861781, Wahiawa, Oahu, Hawaiian
Sincerely,
Amelia Gora, one of Kamehameha III's heirs and successors, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles member, Konohiki, Hawaiian Genealogical Society Representative - Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/ He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/ Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaii/Sandwich Islands (as documented in the 1849/1850 Treaty)
References:
Affidavit/Lien No. 96-177455 filed on 12/17/1996 (281 pages) filed by Amelia Gora and other liens/affidavits filed by myself/Francis Keoua Gora
Affidavit No. Doc. A-56480947 filed 6/19/2015 (127 pages) filed by John Francis Gora
http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037
Letters/Legal Notices sent to U.S. Presidents Bush, Clinton, and Obama
Letter from the Supreme Court - The Judiciary - State of Hawaii dated May 5, 1998 from James L. Branham
Letter from the Police Department, City and County of Honolulu Ref: 98-2673435 AF-CF dated 7/23/1998 from Lee D. Donahue by Major Robert L. Silva
Legal Notices from the Judicial Tribunal of the Kingdom of Hawaii
http://tribunalaffairs.blogspot.com/2016/03/legal-notice-alodioano-alodial-land.html
Replies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQC5FPPmdos
Ho'aikane - Medley: Keep Hawaiian Lands / Waiting In Vain
They are being fined for traditionally farming taro with water from the stream they helped restore, while corporations continue to take public water for their private profit without proper permits.
Defend the Dueys from this unfair enforcement of our water laws.
Click here.
Aloha <<First Name>>,
On Tuesday, these community elders face fines of $4,500 for growing kalo like their ancestors have done for generations.
You can help defend them and traditional taro farming:
Send an email to dlnr.cwrm@hawaii.gov ASAP. Tell them to reject agenda item A-2. Do not fine taro farmers for exercising their constitutionally protected rights.
Attend the Water Commission meeting on Tuesday August 16, 2016 at 9:30 AMat 132 Punchbowl Street in Honolulu.
Has Hawaiʻi's Water Commission gone mad? The Duey ʻohana has done so much to advocate for traditional and customary practices on Maui and throughout Hawaiʻi, and to restore streamflows for all our benefit. The Water Commission should be thanking the Dueys for their work, but instead is fining them.
For too long, the Water Commission has let corporations like Alexander & Baldwin take millions and millions of gallons of public water every day for their profit-making uses without proper permits. Yet, they decide family farmers exercising their constitutionally protected right to grow taro must be fined thousands of dollars for using (and returning!) an insignificant amount of water from the stream they helped restore.
It is time for all of us to stand up for the Dueys and against the Water Commission's unfair application of Hawaiʻi's water laws. Submit testimony today and attend the Water Commission hearing on Tuesday.
Mahalo,
Marti
--------------
Marti Townsend, Director
Share The Club