Homegrown terrorism is Sunday topic

Published: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:58 AM HST

UHH's Curtis to address HI Conservative Forum

Homegrown terrorism will be the focus of the Conservative Forum for Hawaii August meeting at 2 p.m. Sunday in the Naniloa Volcanoes Resort Palm Room on Banyan Drive in Hilo.

Thom Curtis, chairman of the University of Hawaii at Hilo Sociology Department, will address the group. The public is invited.

Over the past eight years, Curtis has focused his research agenda on the growing threat of homegrown terrorism.


"Whereas the Sept. 11, 2001 hijackers and most other perpetrators of terrorism attacks in Europe and the United States were strangers, many attacks in the West since 2004 have been conducted by permanent residents or citizens of the country they attacked," said forum President Walter Moe.

While earlier Islamist terrorists had received support from minority factions within the burgeoning Muslim populations in both the U.S. and Europe, those directly involved in attacks were almost always foreign nationals.

Several incidents over the past few months including the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas and the car bomb planted in Times Square have demonstrated the significance of this new threat.

"Dr. Curtis has tracked over 150 United States citizens who have been indicted or convicted of radical Islamist activities," said Moe. "He will discuss his findings regarding the motivations and criminal pathways of these 'homegrown terrorists' as well as the steps that security and intelligence agencies are taking to protect us from this homegrown threat.

"Dr. Curtis will also discuss his research into the potential for the sovereignty movement to present a homegrown threat in Hawaii," he said.

The Conservative Forum is a nonpartisan organization which meets monthly. Visit http://www.conforhawaii.com or contact Moe at 966-5420 for more information.

Curtis's research and much of his teaching has focused on psychological and sociological impacts of disasters and terrorism. He recently spent two summers in Europe collecting data on radicalization of Muslim communities and has traveled to Israel four times since 2006 to conduct terrorism-related research. Additionally, he is lead investigator on two projects regarding homegrown terrorism.

The first is the development of a database of U.S. citizens who have conducted radical Islamist terrorism activities. The second is on the potential of the Native Hawaiian Sovereignty movement evolving toward a more violent approach for accomplishing its goals.

Curtis has published dozens of articles detailing his research on disasters and terrorism. He has been invited to present his findings at numerous conferences in the United States, Europe and Israel including the International Institute for Counter Terrorism, the American Psychological Association, the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, the American Counseling Association, the International Academy of Linguistics, Behavioral and Social Sciences, the University of South Dakota Disaster Mental Health Institute, the International Social Sciences Research Conference

You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • aloha Amelia,
    In my house I had my grandchildren paint their ideas on poster boards and all I told them to do was to use things from the 70s. I came back to poster boards with peace signs all over them. I was taken back as to why my grandchildren did that and forgot that they had to go back to the 70s according to my instructions.

    So I appreciate whole heartedly, even Josh enjoyed the signs and took it home to put in his bedroom.

    I was a hippy joining the peace movement and against my own family whom later gave me butterfly kisses instead of the kiss of death. They understood in later years after they too realized the ugly 50 thousand plus dead American Soilders.

    I did see the Wall in DC it was an experience! I did go naked too and that was a sign of okay now what? My bead collection is still with me although the original beads are gone, I still collect them in love of mankine.
    All we are saying....just give peace a chance... all we are saying just give peace a chance...
    Much aloha for your posting
    • hi Kaohi,

      Obama's ancestors were part of the dethronement planners of Queen Liliuokalani, so rather than being exposed, he turns to calling our peaceful loving, supporters of Queen Liliuokalani, from a neutral nation as people who would become violent..............

      As noted from some of posts made, the U.S. has been involved in 22 WARS since 1945..........most of which were PLUNDERING UPON INNOCENTS.

      With the Depleted Uranium, weapons in a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation, Obama and Friends are part of the problems that the World is being faced with......and all because the criminal environment and the moves to protect and perpetuate their criminal wrongdoing began with the stealing of monies, resources, lands, etc. from a nation which did no wrong.............

      Obama's family is part of the bankrupt bankers, specifically BANK OF HAWAII, Bush's roots are from the Hawaiian Islands ---- appears to be tied in to the hotel business, later part of the Oil Companies and under the Standard Oil group which evolved into EXXON with the same CEO's the Rockefellers.....then, the entity Governor Lingle is part of the Cutter family, then there's so many others who have enrichened themselves based on the criminal moves against a peaceful, non warring nation and whose ancestors were treasonous to the Hawaiian Kingdom which is now on the records for the World to see.....all of these PIRATES were supported by the U.S. Government, England, and the Morgan bankers (includes the international bankers such as the Bank of England, etc.) .......

      The following are the treason laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/ Hawaiian Government, which is not the belligerent occupiers:




      Yes, the truth is documented for all to see....good people have consciences....includes all peace loving, friendly people who are more aware of the issues than indoctrinated others..........

      aloha nui.

      For all who died needlessly:

      watch?v=SMwXPueu-RMhttp:

      • Cool music!! bring back a whole lot of memories good ones. Couldn't rersist listening to Jani Joplin!!!!

        .....wow those were the good ole days I can smell the air (in memory of course). and we moved on....
  • Amelia,

    Secretary Hillary Clinton wrote her Disertation on Saul Alinsky. Although I have her disertation on my shelf and read it during down time. I am surprise that it hit the interest of C-span, tomorrow Sunday sep 12, Saul Alinsky will be discussed.

    I've walked the road on Saul Alinsky movement in the late 90's out of curiosity and was amazed to have learned a lot on the Chicano Movements. But, because no one else was intersted it was a lonely road. I had all of Peter Matthiessen's books and Sauls lined up on my floor for almost two years, I borrowed it from Hamilton. These books are rare and sadly, I believe will soon walk away from the shelves because of the Patriot Act, if it haven't already. You know those wanna bee CIA agents kine stuff.

    I believe this is where Curtis is alluding to as far as the word 'radical'

    Much of my work with the homeless comes from Saul Alinsky's thinking but sadly tho, Na Kanaka poverty to get out of their slumming because they are on a different mind set. If they have the strength to leave and assimulate into the American system-- they are used. Temporarily for data gathering and then are spit out onto the pavement in the unemployment or back in poverty as if they were trash.

    I saw that happening with the censes, Hawaiian entities lots of false hopes. So one needs skills to hit the pavement running with resume in hand to pay for that car loan and other bills. 2-3 jobs works, I don't have that energy and neither do a whole lot of people.

    Another character I am disappointed with is Isaiah Helekunihi Walker, he did the NorthShore and I really want to know if his name is fictious. Or if he even is a real person living in Hawaii with a maybe Hawaiian sounding name?
    • watch?v=xwJQffbssxohttp:


      Forum: the Independent Argument Forum
      Subject: The USA has gone mad
      From: (HWNWAHINE)
      To: (TURTLEDOVE5)
      DateTime: 15/12/2003 01:19:20

      hi turtledove5,

      nice Peace-ful name......notice the kind of squirrels "government types" are beginning to make these kinds of remarks .... just responded to happeh at http://forums.delphiforums.com/id-argument/messages?msg=21517.162

      .....who has a similar manner....

      the following message will help many in observing "disinformers":

      ***It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.

      This is why concepts from the film, Wag-The-Dog, actually work. If you saw that movie, know that there is at least one real-world counterpart to Al Pacino's character. For CIA, it is Mark Richards, who was called in to orchestrate the media response to Waco on behalf of Janet Reno. Mark Richards is the acknowledged High Priest of Disinformation. His appointment was extremely appropriate, since the CIA was VERY present at Waco from the very beginning of the cult to the very end of their days - just as it was at the People's Temple in Jonestown. Richards purpose in life is damage control.

      For such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known 'liar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it matters not who does the presenting or what their motives are,
      or

      Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position, idea, or solution -- very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another role -- the role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of 'higher standards' of discussion than neces
      sar

      So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological warfare operations) or trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the later freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or -- put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.)
      -*Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly known historical events, and a proper response. Accusations should not be overused -- reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational sidetracks, unless it is feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request (see permissions statement at end):
      ------------------------------------------------------------
      -* A must read site. Great and intersting information there:-http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule0.shtml


      ******
      aloha.

      **************************************
      Kaohi -

      this is an aged post but still applies............

      aloha nui.

      p.s. have to start documenting genocide activists within the claimed aboriginal Hawaiian people such as Walker, etc. many projects going on......and we remain a friendly, neutral, non-violent nation.......notice how Obama et. als. try to say that violence is in the back.........they wish............wicked...beyond wicked, beyond evil............absolutely DIABOLICAL!

      let's post on FB every now and then too........malama and malama pono ;p
      • http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule0.shtml

        DisinformationRule0

        It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.

        This why concepts from the film, Wag-The-Dog, actually work. If you saw that movie, know that there is at least one real-world counterpart to Al Pacino's character. For CIA, it is Mark Richards, who was called in to orchestrate the media response to Waco on behalf of Janet Reno. Mark Richards is the acknowledged High Priest of Disinformation. His appointment was extremely appropriate, since the CIA was VERY present at Waco from the very beginning of the cult to the very end of their days - just as it was at the People's Temple in Jonestown. Richards purpose in life is damage control.

        For such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known 'liar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it matters not who does the presenting or what their motives are, or if they have lied in the past or even if motivated to lie in this instance -- the facts or links would and should stand or fall on their own merit and their part in the matter will merely be supportive.

        Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position, idea, or solution -- very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another role -- the role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of "higher standards" of discussion than necessarily warranted. They will demand that those presenting arguments or concepts back everything up with the same level of expertise as a professor, researcher, or investigative writer. Anything less renders any discussion meaningless and unworthy in their opinion, and anyone who disagrees is obviously stupid -- and they generally put it in exactly those terms.

        So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological warfare operations) or trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the later freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or -- put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.) Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly known historical events, and a proper response. Accusations should not be overused -- reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational sidetracks, unless it is feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request (see permissions statement at end):

        Next: DisinformationRule1.

        http://www.911review.org: Home Page
        Search.
        Brads batcave

        Team 8 +
        Physics911.org - Weblog
  • I listened to all 4 minutes of soulja boy, it was funny much thanks, I needed that.
  • I see that Michael Moore moved into the direction of daily assessments and our young teens that will inherent the streets of the abyss.

    And yes:
    "see http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037 John Nelson, legal researcher's article about how Congress and the U.S. Presidents have created a new Constitution......

    It appears that Thom Curtis is diverting the focus because many eyes are now turning towards those who have been deviously changing the Constitution to suit a few, and moving towards Communism/One World Order/ New World Order while everyone's being diverted towards healthcare, economics, PERPETUAL WARS, Hollywood, video games, and "terrorists" etc.

    aloha."

    One is certainly on it. I noticed that Moore is willing to have Obama in the White House again. I've been watching C-Span for the talks on terroism-something that one does each year since it's inception in 1978. Maoliworld is only now I guess addressing the real issues--what took them so long.

    Hawaiian Kingdom have been on National Security Listing for a very long time, I wondered when Na Kanaka was going to start waking up to this problem and use caution in their activities. Especially when there is children involve.

    But too many Na Kanaka are in denial--so it's a snails pace.

    The President speech landed on:

    "The first is the development of a database of U.S. citizens who have conducted radical Islamist terrorism activities. The second is on the potential of the Native Hawaiian Sovereignty movement evolving toward a more violent approach for accomplishing its goals."

    And when he walked away, I was not surprised.

    Now maybe other's will realize that the White House is reading Maoliworld too.

    We just need to knock some heads in the 'Ivory Tower' world. As to why 'myopia' disease is at the epidemic level on all disciplines --because of scholarships and paycheck blooms. Sensational pseudo scientist are cheapened by covert military operations without remorse to their own and the earth that they live on. Top down driven by the Pentagon.

    Space ship notions as the future living quarters are their dream world as well as goals. They meaning military 'Toy Story" as in Buzz Light Year types. Military men that are still stuck in pre-school mentality.
  • watch?v=TkV-of_eN2whttp:


    Shall we counter that Terrorist hunter?..........lol.........

    How? by getting the message out with a friend..................MICHAEL MOORE!

    just received this message:

    OpenMike -- My New Blog -- Blasts Off on MichaelMoore.com


    Thursday, September 9, 2010

    Hey Everybody,

    Though I'm in the middle of my next project, I, like you, can feel the ill wind blowing across the country as the crazy Right is already suited up and ready to ride into town in November. I don't have any magic tricks to show Mr. Obama, so I've decided instead to start a brand new unstoppable, unapproved, uncompromising, and utterly unruly daily blog on my site (MichaelMoore.com

    ). And sometimes I'll write about what's really on my mind (sports, Marion Cotillard, lost episodes of "F-Troop" and "Rat Patrol," the weather in Portland).

    Actually, a lot is on my mind these days, and I thought you'd like to hear my take on things. But before I launch into the Republicans, I remember the nuns taught us to clean up our own backyard first. So, in addition to my previous offer

    to move in to the White House and work for free, I'll now be sharing my thoughts with the President and with you on my new daily blog.

    I'm calling it OpenMike, and I'd love for you to make a habit of checking it out every day -- and posting your own comments

    for the President and the voting public to see. Very soon we'll have some live chats and some other new additions to my site (like an uncensored "Ask Me ANYTHING FAQ," and some little daily subversive missions I'll send you on). Foreign visitors who are scared sh*tless that the bad old days are coming back are also welcome to join in.

    Here are the first two days of my new blog (from Monday

    and Wednesday

    ). I've reprinted Wednesday's below in full. Monday's has language I, um, never use, but I got inspired by Rahm Emanuel and I wanted him to read it (so I had to speak in his tongue). Some teens (and younger) may have parents who won't want them to read it, so kids, check with mom and dad as you always do.

    I am so sincerely disappointed at how Obama and the Dems have blown much of the first 20 months of holding absolute power. (This is not to say they haven't done a lot of good, but stop any five people on the street and ask them to name the "great accomplishments" of Obama's first term and watch what happens.) The administration's bend-over-backwards, can't-we-all-get-along attitude may win them points at a 4-H Club fair, but their opponents are ruthless cutthroats and have rammed our good country right down the toilet -- and they want to be back in power so they can continue the final flush of everything we used to have and stood for. This likely debacle is less than 8 weeks away.

    But it doesn't have to happen. Obama's speech Wednesday -- click here

    -- was awesome and showed the balls we've been waiting to see since January 2009. Do the Democrats deserve what they're about to get? Absolutely. But we don't. We'll be the ones who will have to suffer; they'll all have cushy lobbying jobs. So do we now have to save them from themselves? How much longer will we have to play this stupid charade? Or do we just let them crash and burn and then start something new out of their wreckage?

    I believe our first African-American president deserves a couple more years to try to get it right. After all, he didn't create the disasters he inherited. I think someone's just got to light a fire under him. So I'll strike my match every day on this new blog. And I invite you to join me and do the same.

    Anyways, enjoy my blogs, enjoy the site (it carries a lot of the buried news you may miss from the mainstream media every day, and it has some other cool things). Thanks to millions of you on my email list

    , to my 300,000 friends on Facebook

    and the nearly 700,000 of you who follow me on Twitter

    where I tweet and tweet and never sleep.

    Thanks!
    Michael

    'A Week of Proclamations

    '

    By Michael Moore

    Wednesday, September 8th, 2010 2:45 PM

    Last week, President Obama addressed the nation, declaring the war in Iraq to be over and that combat troops were all home. Yesterday, two American soldiers were killed in Iraq -- by an Iraqi government soldier. This followed an attack on Sunday on a U.S. base in Baghdad. It all seemed a bit confusing to me because I always thought that when a President declares something, it's supposed to happen. Now I'm worried about the other proclamations Mr. Obama made this past week:

    Tuesday, August 31:
    "Today, I am announcing that combat operations have ceased in Iraq. There will be no more combat. Combat is over. Done. Finished."

    Wednesday, September 1:
    "I am here today to declare an end to global warming. Don't ask me how I did it. And there's no reason to look at thermometers or the polar ice caps anymore, because I just told you everything's great. Just send me another Nobel Peace Prize."

    Thursday, September 2:
    "Today I am announcing there is no more unemployment in America. Everyone else just got a big raise and fantastic health coverage. And all 37 million outsourced jobs are back. (Don't ask your bosses about the raise tomorrow, they'll just be embarrassed.)"

    Friday, September 3:
    "Today I am announcing that mosquitoes and all insects smaller than a centimeter will heretofore go away and stop biting hard working Americans."

    Saturday, September 4:
    "After today's victory over UConn, the Michigan Wolverines will cease playing effective football for the rest of the college season."

    Sunday, September 5:
    "From this day forward, I hereby declare an end to Formica and all other prefabricated counter toppings. Not for me to judge, but: Nobel Peace Prize?"

    Monday, September 6:
    "As your President, I hereby declare an end to Delaware."

    Tuesday, September 7:
    "Democratic Party combat operations have ended. Actually, they never started. We've refused to stand up to the Republicans for the past 20 months -- uh, sorry, make that 20 years -- I mean 30 years -- and we see no reason to start now. Republicans will organize a government after November and I'm just hoping they'll give me a few months to pack before they impeach me for being a Muslim atheist."

    Wednesday, September 8:
    "Today I am declaring an end to the slogans 'Yes We Can!,' 'Change We Can Believe In,' and 'Hope.' The truth is this: No we can't, there's not much change you can believe in, and my only hope is to find a way to turn the clock back to January of 2009 so I can start over and fight like the champ the American people thought they were electing. That is all. I will have no further proclamations."

    **********************************

    That Terrorist Hunter and friends are probably looking at Michael Moore as a Terrorist candidate as they did with Allan Russo.....

    watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIAhttp:


    Michael Moore's Movies Caught Many Peoples Eyes............

    watch?v=yzyYPPw9DiEhttp:


    watch?v=RbwW9Geds3o&feature=relatedhttp:


    watch?v=xlDAUKSh9CQhttp:


    Michael Moore's Movies are Farenheit 911 (Twin Towers 911, etc.) and SICKO (Health Care Issues, etc.).....
    Can you imagine if he got a hold of all of the information about our Hawaiian Islands....the Truth?

    Yes, Michael Moore is about Truth............those who do evil fear Truth............so they must be exposed.....

    aloha.
    • watch?v=tH2w6Oxx0kQ&ob=av2nhttp:

      Back | MER Blog | all subjects :-->MER General Forum


      had to post the acknowledgements part of the book WAR and ANTIWAR:



      United States Military SIX (6) Propaganda Techniques Used on Iraq, etals.

      Excerpts from WAR AND ANTIWAR (1993) by Alvin Toffler and Heidi Toffler;

      Little, Brown and Company (Canada) Limited



      Purpose: “to exploit the mass media to sway mass emotion in mass societies.”



      1. Atrocity accusation.

      Example: “When a fifteen-year-old Kuwaiti testified before Congress during the Gulf War to the effect that Iraqi troops in Kuwait were premature babies and stealing the incubators to take them back to Iraq, she twangerd many a heartstring. The world was not told that she just happened to be the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador in Washington and a member of the royal family, or that her appearance was stage-managed by the Hill & Knowlton public relations firm on behalf of the Kuwaitis.”



      1. Hyperbolic inflation of the stakes involved in a battle or war.

      Example: “Soldiers and civilians are told that everything they hold dear is at risk. President Bush (father of current GWBush) pictured the Gulf conflict as a war for a new and better world order. At stake was not simply the independence of Kuwait, the protection of the world’s oil supply, or elimination of a potential nuclear threat from Saddam, but, supposedly, the fate of civilization itself. As for Saddam, the war was not about his failure to pay back billions of dollars borrowed from the Kuwaitis during the earlier Iran-Iraq war; it was---he claimed—about the entire future of the “Arab Nation.”.”



      2. Demonization and/or dehumanization of the opponent.

      Example. “For Saddam as for his enemies in nex-door Iran, America was “the Great Satan,” Bush was “the Devil in the White House.” In turn, for Bush, Saddam was a “Hitler.” Baghdad radio spoke of American pilots as “rats” and “predatory beasts.” An American colonel described an air strike as “almost like you flipped on the light in the kitchen at night and the roaches start scurrying there, and we’re them.”



      3. Polarization.

      Example. “Those who are not with us are against us.”



      4. Claim of divine sanction.

      Example: “If Saddam draped his aggression in Islamic garb, President Bush also called upon God’s support. As the Moroccan sociologist Fatima Mernissi has pointed out, the incantatory phrase “God bless America” ran through American propaganda—and had an odd, unanticipated side effect when it reached ears in the souks and streets of the Muslim world.” “…Confusion was even greater when God was linked with rhetoric about democracy. Was democracy a religion?”



      6. Meta-propaganda. “Propaganda that discredits the other side’s propaganda.”

      Example: “Coalition spokespeople in the Gulf repeatedly and accurately pointed out

      that Saddam Hussein had total control of the Iraqi press and that, therefore, the

      people of Iraq were denied the truth and Iraqi airwaves were filled with lies. Meta-

      propaganda is particularly potent because, instead of challenging the veracity of a

      single story, it calls into question everything coming from the enemy. Its aim is to

      produce wholesale, as distinct from retail, disbelief.”



      Acknowledgments part of the book WAR AND ANTI-WAR by Alvin and Heidi Toffler, the following appears on page 253:

      "Among those who took the time to assist us or share their ideas with us were Grace Aaron, Duane Andrews, John Arquilla, John boyd, Carl Builder, D*i*c*k Cheney, Ray Cline, John Connally, Klaus Dannenberg, Michael Dewar, William Forster, Lewis Franklin, Pierre Gallois, Newt Gingrich, Dan Goldin, Daniel Goure, Jerome Granrud, Steve Hanser, Jerry Harrison, Ryan Henry, Zalmay Khalilizad, Tom King, Andy Marshall, Andy Messing, Janet and Chris Morris, Jim Pinkerton, Jonathan Pollock, Jonathan Regan, David Ronfeldt, Tim Rynne, Larry Seaquist, Stuart Slade, Donn Starry, Robert Steele, Bill Stofft, Paul Strassmann, Dean Wilkening,and Henry Yuen. As noted in the text, Patti Morelli, the widow of Don Morelli..."

      Their daughter, Karen Toffler, Robert Basile, Valerie Vasquez, Juan Gomez, Jim Silberman,"our old friend and now our editor at Little, Brown. We received endless support from our agent, Perry Knowlton, and the people on his team at Curtis Brown Ltd., especially Grace Wherry, Dave Barbor, and Tim Knowlton."

      *************

      With Cheney and Gingrich names alone.....it basically means that the information is researched, verified, etc.

      aloha.



      ***************



      9/7/05 comment: Notice how



      “3. Polarization.

      Example. “Those who are not with us are against us.”



      Has been used by U.S. President George W. Bush over time……



      In others words, as with WAR GAMES by Thomas B. Allen, and many other good books, the information can be used to translate what is going on in government, society today. The books may be seen as Tips, GOOD ADVICE, good information, and can be useful for most.



      Aloha.






      THE COLORS OF U.S. WARS



      Review by Amelia Kuulei Gora,

      one of Kamehameha’s, Queen

      Liliuokalani’s etals descendants,

      a Royal person not subject to the

      laws (2005)



      The following is a 2003 post from Mutassdes. Notes of COLORS involved in the U.S. Wars and Summary were added.



      Forum: the Independent Argument Forum

      Subject: worried about nuclear weapons?

      From: (MUTASSDES)

      To: (HWNWAHINE)

      DateTime: 03/04/2003 12:47:32



      this is also relevant, but not a complete list, as it doesn't include Galtieri of Argentina for a start.



      http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/dictators.html



      another relevant list of facts:-



      Here's a list of the countries that the U.S. has ed since the end of World War II, compiled by historian William Blum:



      China 1945-46 COLOR: Yellow

      Korea 1950-53 COLOR: Yellow

      China 1950-53 COLOR: Yellow

      Guatemala 1954 COLOR: Brown

      Indonesia 1958 COLOR: Brown

      Cuba 1959-60 COLOR: Brown, Black, Yellow

      Guatemala 1960 COLOR: Brown

      Congo 1964 COLOR: Black, Brown

      Peru 1965 COLOR: Brown, Olive

      Laos 1964-73 COLOR: Yellow, Brown

      Vietnam 1961-73 COLOR: Yellow, Brown

      Cambodia 1969-70 COLOR: Yellow, Brown

      Guatemala 1967-69 COLOR: Brown

      Grenada 1983 COLOR: Brown

      Libya 1986 COLOR: Black, Olive, Brown

      El Salvador 1980s COLOR: Brown

      Nicaragua 1980s COLOR: Olive, Brown

      Panama 1989 COLOR: Brown

      Iraq 1991-99 COLOR: Olive, Brown

      Sudan 1998 COLOR: Olive, Brown

      Afghanistan 1998 COLOR: Olive, Brown

      Yugoslavia 1999 COLOR: White



      ADD to the above 9/07/05:

      Iraq COLOR: Olive, Brown





      GRAND TOTAL: BROWN (and mixed) = 9 Wars

      YELLOW (and mixed)= 6 Wars

      OLIVE (and mixed) = 4 Wars

      BLACK (and mixed) = 2 Wars

      WHITE = 1 War



      SUMMARY



      From 1945 to 2005, there were a total of 22 Wars involving the U.S.



      Out of the 22 Wars, 21 were Wars against PEOPLE OF COLOR. Only one (1) War was against Whites.




      Therefore, by the statistics above, the U.S. definitely has animosities towards ALL PEOPLE OF COLOR.



      Aloha.






      PART 2:



      Notice that out of the following list of 42 ‘dictators’, 41 are PEOPLE OF COLOR and one (1) appears to be White.



      Once again, there appears a significant issue by the U.S. against PEOPLE OF COLOR.



      The following is from http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/dictators.html






      Friendly Dictators

      (written in 1995)



      Many of the world's most repressive dictators have been friends of America. Tyrants, rs, killers, and sundry dictators and corrupt puppet-presidents have been aided, supported, and rewarded handsomely for their loyalty to US interests. Traditional dictators seize control through force, while constitutional dictators hold office through voting fraud or severely restricted elections, and are frequently puppets and apologists for the military juntas which control the ballot boxes. In any case, none have been democratically elected by the majority of their people in fair and open elections.

      They are democratic America's undemocratic allies. They may rise to power through y ClA-backed coups and rule by and . Their troops may receive training or advice from the CIA and other US agencies. US military aid and weapons sales often strengthen their armies and guarantee their hold on power. Unwavering "anti-communism" and a willingness to provide unhampered access for American business interests to exploit their countries' natural resources and cheap labor are the excuses for their repression, and the primary reason the US government supports them. They may be linked internationalIy to extreme right-wing groups such as the World Anti-Communist League, and some have had strong affiliations and have offered sanctuary to WWll war criminals.

      They usually grow rich, while their countries' economies deteriorate and the majority of their people live in poverty. US tax dollars and US-backed loans have made billionaires of some, while others are international dealers who also collect CIA paychecks. Rarely are they called to account for their crimes. And rarely still, is the US government held responsible for supporting and protecting some of the worst human rights violators in the world.

      Friendly dictators


      Abacha, General Sani ----------------------------Nigeria
      Amin, Idi ------------------------------------------Uganda
      Banzer, Colonel Hugo ---------------------------Bolivia
      Batista, Fulgencio --------------------------------Cuba
      Bolkiah, Sir Hassanal ----------------------------Brunei
      Botha, P.W. ---------------------------------------South Africa
      Branco, General Humberto ---------------------Brazil
      Cedras, Raoul -------------------------------------Haiti
      Cerezo, Vinicio -----------------------------------Guatemala
      Chiang Kai-Shek ---------------------------------Taiwan
      Cordova, Roberto Suazo ------------------------Honduras
      Christiani, Alfredo -------------------------------El Salvador
      Diem, Ngo Dihn ---------------------------------Vietnam
      Doe, General Samuel ----------------------------Liberia
      Duvalier, Francois --------------------------------Haiti
      Duvalier, Jean Claude-----------------------------Haiti
      Fahd bin'Abdul-'Aziz, King ---------------------Saudi Arabia
      Franco, General Francisco -----------------------Spain
      Hitler, Adolf ---------------------------------------Germany
      Hassan II-------------------------------------------Morocco
      Marcos, Ferdinand -------------------------------Philippines
      Martinez, General Maximiliano Hernandez ---El Salvador
      Mobutu Sese Seko -------------------------------Zaire
      Noriega, General Manuel ------------------------Panama
      Ozal, Turgut --------------------------------------Turkey
      Pahlevi, Shah Mohammed Reza ---------------Iran
      Papadopoulos, George --------------------------Greece
      Park Chung Hee ---------------------------------South Korea
      Pinochet, General Augusto ---------------------Chile
      Pol Pot---------------------------------------------Cambodia
      Rabuka, General Sitiveni ------------------------Fiji
      Montt, General Efrain Rios ---------------------Guatemala
      Salassie, Halie ------------------------------------Ethiopia
      Salazar, Antonio de Oliveira --------------------Portugal
      Somoza, Anastasio Jr. --------------------------Nicaragua
      Somoza, Anastasio, Sr. -------------------------Nicaragua
      Smith, Ian ----------------------------------------Rhodesia
      Stroessner, Alfredo -----------------------------Paraguay
      Suharto, General ---------------------------------Indonesia
      Trujillo, Rafael Leonidas -----------------------Dominican Republic
      Videla, General Jorge Rafael ------------------Argentina
      Zia Ul-Haq, Mohammed ----------------------Pakistan



      GENERAL SANI ABACHA

      President of Nigeria

      General Sani Abacha is a corrupt and repressive dictator in the oil-rich country of Nigeria. Supported by oil wealth, Abacha has tried to cover his repression under a mantle of democracy by allowing fraudulent elections which only serve to guarantee his continued control. During elections in 1994, Chief Moshood Abiola, considered to be the likely winner, was arrested and placed in prison before the rigged results were announced; Abacha retained control. More than 100 government s occurred in 1994, and numerous pro-democracy demonstrators were killed by police. Shell Oil provides most of the country's wealth by extracting oil from the Ogoniland region, while in the process causing severe environmental destruction and devastating the local economy. More than 700 Ogoni environmentalists protesting the destruction of their way of life, were executed in recent years. The greatest travesty occurred in November 1995, when environmental leader Ken Saro-Wiwa and 8 associates,

      were
      hanged despite an international outcry. Shell supported Abacha's policies by its silence. Despite an outcry that Nigerian oil be boycotted, the US government refused to do so.

      IDI AMIN

      General of Uganda

      Amin was one of the most notorious of Africa's post-independence dictators. A former heavyweight boxing champion in Uganda and a non-commissioned officer in the British Army there, Amin caught the attention of his superiors because of his efficient management of concentration camps in Kenya during the Mau Mau rebellion in the 1950s, where he earned the title of "The Strangler". Because of his loyalty to Britain and his strongly anti-communist stance, Amin was picked by the British to replace the elected Ugandan government in a 1971 coup. While in power, he earned a reputation as a "clown" in some circles in the West, but he was no joke at home. Amin brutalized his people with British and US military aid and with Israeli and CIA training of his troops. The body count of his friends, the clergy, soldiers, and ordinary Ugandans rose daily, but the West ignored his cruelty. As he continued to demand more aid and sophisticated weapons, he finally lost support. In 1979, his quest f

      or more
      power lead him to invade Tanzania. In retaliation, he was overthrown by an invading Tanzanian / Ugandan army. Amin fled to Saudi Arabia, where he now lives a quiet life in a modest villa outside Jeddah, looking after his goats and chickens and cultivating his vegetable garden. Traditional Arab garb has replaced the bemedalled Field Marshal's uniform of his heyday.


      COLONEL HUGO BANZER

      President of Bolivia

      In 1970, in Bolivia, when then-President Juan Jose Torres nationalized Gulf Oil properties and tin mines owned by US interests, and tried to establish friendly relations with Cuba and the Soviet Union, he was playing with fire. The coup to overthrow Torres, led by US-trained officer and Gulf Oil beneficiary Hugo Banzer, had direct support from Washington. When Banzer's forces had a breakdown in radio communications, US Air Force radio was placed at their disposal. Once in power, Banzer began a reign of . Schools were shut down as hotbeds of political subversive activity. Within two years, 2,000 people were arrested and d without trial. As in Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil, the native Indians were ordered off their land and deprived of tribal identity. Tens-of-thousands of white South Africans were enticed to immigrate with promises of the land stolen from the Indians, with a goal of creating a white Bolivia. When Catholic clergy tried to aid the Indians, the regi

      me, with
      CIA help, launched ist attacks against them, and this "Banzer Plan" became a for similar anti-Catholic actions throughout Latin America.


      FULGENCIO BATISTA

      President of Cuba

      Cuban Army Sergeant Fulgencio Batista first seized power in a 1932 coup. He was President Roosevelt's handpicked dictator to counteract leftists who had overthrown strongman Cerardo Machado. Batista ruled or several years, then left for Miami, returning in 1952 just in time for another coup, against elected president Carlos Prio Socorras. His new regime was quickly recognized by President Eisenhower. Under Batista, U.S. interests flourished and little was said about democracy. With the loyal support of Batista, Mafioso boss Meyer Lansky developed Havana into an international port. Cabinet offices were bought and sold and military officials made huge sums on smuggling and vice rackets. Havana became a fashionable hot spot where America's rich and famous drank and gambled with mobsters. As the gap between the rich and poor grew wider, the poor grew impatient. In 1953, Fidel Castro led an armed group of rebels in a failed uprising on the Moncada army barracks. Castro tempor

      arily
      fled the country and Batista struck back with a vengeance. Freedom of speech was curtailed and subversive teachers, lawyers and public officials were fired from their jobs. squads d and killed thousands of "communists". Batista was assisted in his down by Lansky and other members of organized crime who believed Castro would jeopardize their gambling and trade. Despite this, Batista remained a friend to Eisenhower and the US until he was finally overthrown by Castro in 1959.



      SIR HASSANAL BOLKIAH

      The Sultan of Brunei

      To illegally fund what they referred to as the "Democratic Resistance" in Nicaragua, Oliver North and Former Assistant Secretary d State Elliot Abrams solicited funds from several authoritarian regimes, including Taiwan, South Korea and the more obscure Sultanate of Brunei Darussalam. Sir Hassanal Bolkiah, the Sultan of Brunei, the world's richest monarch, was indeed generous to the Contras -- to the tune of $10 million. But, this generosity was not because of any commitment to democracy in Nicaragua or anywhere else, for Brunei is a monarchical dictatorship, under a State of Emergency since 1982. The Sultan also allows Brunei to be the ClA's ears on the e Malaysian-lndonesian border. His Royal Highness was also involved with the infamous Nugan Hand Bank of Australia, a 1960s-70s CIA front for South East Asian operations and money laundering. In fact, according to a secret 1978 memo, Nugan Hand submitted a proposal to provide His Highness the Sultan with a bank s

      tructure
      and depository system which he alone can control should any change of government take place. The Sultan lives in a new palace that may have cost as much as a billion dollars, while over 90% of his subjects live in abject poverty. Those who protest such inequalities don't fare well with the authorities. According to Amnesty International, Brunei's jails hold "at least five prisoners of conscience who have spent 25 years in detention without having been convicted of any crime."


      P.W. BOTHA

      President of South Africa

      During P.W. Botha's first term as President, the former Secretary of Defense altered the structure of government, giving the military and police unprecedented power. To justify this, he pointed to increasingly vocal discontent among South Africa's disenfranchised blacks, the large number of black states In Africa, and a so-called "growing Marxist" threat in the region. South Africa, he said, was engaged in a "total war' and must develop a "total strategy" to fight the battle. South Africa's apartheid regime was quietly supported by the US government, despite a UN boycott and Congressional efforts to reduce US investment there, Ronald Reagan significantly increased military expenditures in the country. But few Americans realized that Botha's total strategy against blacks had turned his nation into a ruthless aggressor. When Portugal withdrew from its colonies in Mozambique and Angola, Botha, claiming he wanted to strengthen capitalism on the continent, financed the Mozambique

      National
      Resistance (MNR) against the country's popular government. The MNR, who receive direct training from South Africa, cut off the ears, noses, and limbs of civilians. After their parents and raping young women in front of 10 year old boys, they recruited these boys to fight. In 1989, P.W. Botha suffered a stroke and later resigned. In early 1990 his successor, F.W. De Klerk, watching as international sanctions ruined S. Africa's economy, legalized political opposition parties and freed several important black political prisoners, including Nelson Mandela who had been imprisoned for 27 years for political activities against apartheid. Apartheid finally fell when Nelson Mandela was elected President of South Africa.


      GENERAL HUMBERTO BRANCO

      President of Brazil

      In 1961, Brazilian President Jaao Goulart sought to trade with communist nations, supported the labor movement, and had limited the profits multi-nationals could take out of the country. These policies were clearly unacceptable to the American business interests. In 1964, the US took part in the overthrow of Goulart by General Humberto de Alencar Castello Branco, although US government officials have denied involvement. As an example of US support for Branco, just prior to the coup, US officials cabled Washington a request for oil for Branco's soldiers in case Goulart's troops blew up the refineries. Brancos regime was short but brutal. Labor unions were banned, criticism of the President became unlawful, and thousands of suspected communists (including children) were arrested and d. As in Paraguay, Argentina, and Bolivia, land was stolen from native Indians and their culture was destroyed. dealers, many of them government officials, were given protection because

      they
      maintained national security interests. Brazil formed ties with the World Anti-communist League and assisted General Videla in his takeover of Argentina. When Branco stepped down in 1967, he left behind a constitution with greatly increased military and executive powers, crippling Brazil's efforts to restore democracy.


      RAOUL CEDRAS

      General of Haiti

      General Cedras seized power in Haiti in 1991 after the election of Jean-Bertrand Aristide. He ruled with the rod of iron associated with Haiti's infamous former dictators, the Duvaliers -- there were at least 4.000 political assassinations and more than 40,000 fled the country in boats for the US. He fled into exile in September 1994 when the US sent an invasion force under the banner of the UN.

      Cedras is now in Panama, the only rival to France as the favorite haven for former dictators -- Juan Domingo Peron of Argentina and the Shah of Iran once took refuge there, and Guatemala's Jorge Serrano is a great success as a racehorse owner. Cedras has a penthouse suite in Panama City's wealthy Punta Paitilla area. He is not short of cash -- the US State Department alone pays him $5,000 a month in rent for his properties in Haiti. Panama University Professor Miguel Antonio Bernal complains: 'Our country is being used as a wastebasket for the political toxic waste of the world.'


      VINICIO CEREZO

      President of Guatemala

      According to Amnesty International, arbitrary arrest, , disappearance, and political s were everyday realities for Guatemalans during decades of US financed military dictatorship. In January 1986, Christian Democrat leader Vinicio Cerezo was elected President and said he had "the political will to respect the rights of man", but it didn't take long to find out that his political will was irrelevant in the face of Guatemala's well-oiled military machine. Hopes for change were dashed when Cerezo announced that Guatemala would continue to provide amnesty for all past military offenses committed from General Elrain Rios Montt's coup in 1982 through the 1986 elections. Although Ronald Reagan's State Department asserted "there has not been a single clear-cut case of political , within months of Cerezo's inauguration, opposition leaders attributed 56 to security forces and squads, while Americas Watch claimed that "throughout 1986, violent s

      were
      reported in the Guatemalan press at the rate of 100 per month". Altogether, Americas Watch says, tens-of-thousands were killed and 400 rural villages were destroyed by government squads during Reagan's term in office. Colonel D'Jalma Dominguez, former army spokesman, explains "For convenience sake a civilian government is preferable, such as the one we have now. If anything goes wrong, only the Christian Democrats will get the blame. It's better to remain outside. The real power will not be lost." Today, the real power still resides with the military.


      CHIANG KAI-SHEK

      President of Taiwan

      The Chinese civil war pitted Mao Tse-Tung's Communists against Chiang Kai-Shek's Nationalists. The US-backed Chiang, but when he couldn't do the job they also supported Japanese troops fighting the Communists, even before WWll had ended. d for his wanton cruelty, corruption, and decadence, Chiang did not enjoy the support of the Chinese people; entire divisions of the Nationalist army defected and fled to the island of Formosa (Taiwan). A presidential commission appointed by Harry Truman reported after Chiang's arrival there that his forces "ruthlessly, corruptly, and avariciously imposed their regime on the population. Under Nationalist rule, 85% of the population was disenfranchised, but the onset of the Korean War and the anti-communist hysteria of the McCarthy era led the US to declare that the tiny island represented the real government of China. The US was crucial in keeping mainland China out of the UN until 1971. Chiang gave the World Anti-Communist League (an
      international organization with links to s, smugglers, and the CIA) its first home, permitting WACL members to use a military academy there to train troops for Latin American military coups. President Carter tried to cut US ties to WACL, but Ronald Reagan received campaign funds from the group, and WACL became involved with training and supplying contras in Argentina and Taiwan. Chiang Kai-Shek died in 1975, but many of his policies continue in Taiwan.
This reply was deleted.