Hi
Hank Fergerstrom
are you no longer part of our Konohiki on the Big Island....please let me know so i can make proper changes/terminate your name off of our list, etc. Letting you know that the Kawananakoa' are part of the treasonous persons because they supported the usurpers. Princes Kuhio and Kawananakoa did file a deed to lands conveyed by Queen Kapiolani which was supposed to have been filed after her death....she made a case against them and the alien court supported the two Kuhio and Kawananakoa. Pohakuloa is part of the Crown Lands belonging to Kamehameha III who has descendants today.............Non-owners conveyed lands belonging to Kamehameha III, his heirs and successors, not to Identity thieves..........Allodial lands belongs to the families only, those who are not treasonous..... Bernice Pauahi Bishop was claimed to be the "last of the Kamehameha's" which was a Lie....Bernice Pauahi had stepsiblings named Kalola; Kaluaikau; Alapai; and Abigail Maheha. Her hanai/adopted sister was Kaeha/ Kamakaeha/Makaeha/Lydia/Liliuokalani/ Queen Liliuokalani. Our family are the descendants of Kalola who was also the next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi in Probate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop. Her husband Charles Reed Bishop a treasonous banker lost all interest in lands due to his moves in supporting the usurpers. Reference: In the Land of Poi article at https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/.../in-land-of... Charles Reed Bishop died in 1915, and Kalola's descendants and heirs own all of the lands now. Liens/Affidavits have been on record since 1996 at the Bureau of Conveyances No. 96-177455 (281 pages) filed on 12/17/96 and Joinder No. Doc A-71510779 filed on July 31, 2019 (118 pages) was filed at the Bureau of Conveyances, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii. My brother and I found the Crown Lands deeds and the Government Lands deeds and included them in the Joinder. Reference: An Act relating to the lands of his Majesty the King and of the government, passed June 7, 1848 from Session Laws (Series 263), Department of the Interior of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Kamehameha III, himself, his heirs, and successors are owners of the Crown Lands. The House of Nobles and the Minister of Interior are the caretakers of the Government lands, etc. The Kawananakoas frauds are perpetuated by Abigail Kawananakoa who is listed as a genocide activist and on our Hawaiian Kingom Judicial Tribunal list, etc. ...once again, please let me know so that I can remove your name...btw there are Kamehameha descendants living on the Big Island too...fyi.
IOLANI-THEROYALHAWK.BLOGSPOT.COM
* Pirate Eyes On Hawaii Series: "IN THE LAND OF POI" Treason by Charles Reed Bishop, his half-white wife, etc. Evidence for all
- Like
- · Reply
- · Remove Preview
- · 1m
Queen Kapiolani was the hanai/adopted daughter of my great grandfather Kaluakini making her my grandmother's sister. Queen Kapiolani's sister was Abigaila/Poomaikelani/Kapooloku/ Princess Poomaikelani who died in 1895. She was my great grandmother. They had a brother named Kapali/ Kapaliuweloa who was adopted by my mother's side of the family. We are in contact with the descendants who live on Oahu. Kinoiki's descendants named Kuhio and Kawananakoa became treasonous persons. Evidence: see below ....also know that the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees claimed themselves to be heirs ---lies..they were deceitful Aliens perpetuating the frauds, deceptions of Charles Reed Bishop ---they are Not the allodial land owners...we are! They are on the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii Supreme Court cases - btw this is the court of original jurisdiction as found in research and we have brought in back about four (4) year ago. ... aloha.
- Like
- · Reply
- · 1m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SidJMMSZ3Y btw it is the non-owners who allowed the U.S. lands which they do Not own....truly Pirates, and they cannot own lands...so for Pohakuloa etc. they cannot own lands....even Pearl Harbor is only a lease......we are surrounded by Pirates, thieves, sellouts including the Kawananakoa's....auwe!
Reference:
FB
I sent in my response to the scoping for the environmental Impact Statement for Pohakuloa:
Hanalei Fergerstrom, October 12, 2020
Authorized Representative of
Kamahuilani Kawanakoa ;
Spokesperson for
Na Kupuna Moku O Keawe
P.O. Box 951
Kurtistown, Hawaii 96760
808 938-9994
hankhawaiian@yahoo.com
ATLR PTA EIS Comments
P.O. Box 3444
Honolulu, Hawaii 96801-3444
RESPONSE TO SCOPING FOR THE EIS PREPARATION RE:
POHAKULOA MILITARY TRAINING AREA
DISCLAIMER: THIS RESPONSE IS A MATTER OF NECESSITY, SELF DEFENSE, SELF PRESERVATION, BUT IS NOT INTENDED TO RELINQUISH/DIMINISH ANY RIGHTS, CLAIMS OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM.
Regarding the Misinformation of the Historic Background
1) The United States does not have any lawful authority to assert its jurisdiction in the Archipelagic Nation State of the Hawaiian Kingdom.
2) The Hawaiian Kingdom is a “neutral” Nation State in continuity.
The sources of the international law of neutrality are customary inter- national law and, for certain questions, international treaties, in particular the Paris Declaration of 1856, the 1907 Hague Convention No. V respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, the 1907 Hague Convention No. XIII concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War, the four 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I of 1977.
3) There is no Treaty of Annexation between the Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States.
4) Lawful Land Title belongs to the Hawaiian Kingdom and is registered with the Bureau of Conveyances. See: Mahele
5) The State of Hawaii is a civilian arm of a illegal military occupation and acts in collusion with the United States in the theft, pillaging and engagement of fraudulent conversion of lands belonging to the Hawaiian Kingdom.
6) United States Public Law 103-150 also known as the Apology Bill acknowledges the role of the United States in the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom. There are several key “whereas” clauses that directly reflect.
Whereas, the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum.
Whereas, the health and well-being of the Native Hawaiian people is intrinsically tied to their deep feelings and attachment to the land;
Whereas, the Native Hawaiian people are determined to preserve, develop and transmit to future generations their ancestral territory, and their cultural identity in accordance with their own spiritual and traditional beliefs, customs, practices, language, and social institutions;
________________________________________________________________________
History of Land Ownership and Use sec. 3.3.1
Note: my comments are identified by using brackets and italics, the rest is as written in your document.
Prior to Statehood, land in the Pohakuloa area was held by the Kingdom of Hawaii. The lands were either Crown or Government lands until 1893, when the Hawaiian Kingdom was overthrown. The successor government [ de facto ] , the Republic of Hawaii ASSUMED OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THESE LANDS., When the Republic of Hawaii was annexed as a territory of the U.S. under the joint resolution of annexation, the Republic ceded these lands to the US. [ annexation is accomplished by way of a Treaty of Annexation not by Joint Resolution which is a internal aspiration. For example: the government of another country cannot simply annex a foreign county by an resolution…for that to be true… than any country could simply by resolution annex the United States] The U.S. accepted ownership of the lands in fee simple. [ this acceptance of ownership of the land is tantamount to the acceptance of stolen property] These lands are referred to as ceded lands.
…On August 21, 1959, Hawaii was admitted into the union and ceded lands were transferred to the newly created state, subject to the TRUST provisions in section 5 of the “Admissions Act”
_________________________________________________________________________
REGARDING THE CEDED LANDS TRUST PROVISIONS OF THE ADMISSION ACT
Under the trust provisions of the Ceded Lands (5f), there are five identified beneficiaries. 1) Support of Public Schools and Institutions 2) betterment of conditions of Native Hawaiians 3) Development of farm and home ownership 4) making of public improvements 5) Provisions of land for public use
There are two fundamentals of a trust. 1) Protection of the trust corpus 2) The trustee cannot become the beneficiary.
So when discussing the properties of Pohakuloa it is clear that those lands are part of the ceded lands so they are not the property of the State of Hawaii, but rather they are properties held in trust by the State of Hawaii. It is important to make the distinction between what is ‘STATE OWNED” lands and CEDED Lands held in Trust by the State as ceded lands come with Trust provisions. There is no provision that allows for Military Use and the destruction of lands held in Trust.
________________________________________________________________
REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
As the Hawaiians are intrinsically tied to the land (Apology Bill PL 103-150) it is reasonable to equate Hawaiians to the natural world, i.e. the environment. Therefore the impact on the Hawaiian people should be an integral part of this and every Environmental Impact Statement.
There are many obstructions/obstacles to the ability to do a complete Environmental Impact Statement. The Pohakuloa area is completely controlled by the US military. As such, the public does not have open access to these areas to even do a complete survey of the lands. Having contacted the Counsel of Historic Preservation to question our ability to survey these lands, we were told that a complete survey may in fact not be able to be completed because the Military has said that there were to many potential hazards like unexploded ordinances and residue from previously used weapons and munitions like Depleted Uranium used in the Davy Crockett spotting rounds. Bazooka firing ranges, canon firing ranges.
Problematic to this is the fact that the Army has not complied with some of the provisions of their lease that have not been adhered to like the cleanups after every major exercise. This problem of non adherence has recently lead to an suit against the STATE DLNR for not tending to the lease agreement between the State and the ARMY. The Plaintiff’s prevailed, with the court stating that DLNR was in Breach of Trust citing the failure of the DLNR to adhere to the principles of “Malama Aina” when it came to insuring that the ARMY was incompliance with the provisions of the lease regarding clean-up’s after every training exercise.
_______________________________________________________
This intended complete Environmental Impact Statement is centered around the Leased Lands at Pohakuloa containing approximately 23,000 acres of land. Yet the entire PTA acreage is approximately 132, 000 acres. With even the 23,000 acres of the leased lands not full accessible, there is this overlying picture of US Military Control of the entire basin between the Volcanic mountains of Mauna Kea, Mauna Loa and Hualalai. Outside of the 23,000 acres under this lease are lands claimed to be US Government owned. By doing research on those properties claimed to owned by the US Government, we find that most of those lands were attained thru Presidential and Gubernatorial executive orders, but all those executive orders are predicated upon the illegal annexation of Hawaii and subsequent Statehood Act.
________________________________________________________
Religious and Cultural Attributes
The entire area referred to as the basin, or the saddle. The lands between the Volcanic Mountains of Mauna Kea, Mauna Loa, and Hualalai, is of extraordinary importance to the Culture and Religion. To help in understanding we must began with the location: The AHUPUAA of KAOHE is the largest Ahupuaa in Hawaii. It begins in the District of Hamakua, stretches across Mauna Kea and encumbers all of the lands between Mauna Kea, Mauna Loa and Hualali. KAOHE refers to the Bamboo but has the kauna of the ability to hold water. Kaohe connects to the upper watershed areas of Kona, Kau, Puu Anahulu, South Kohala, Hamakua, and Hilo.
From the area between Mauna Loa and Hualali is the very sacred trail of our legendary warrior known as UMI A LILOA. This trail comes up from Kona thru the pass between Mauna Loa and Hualalai goes across Pohakuloa then up Mauna Kea over to Hamakua.
From my own eye, I view Mauna Kea as the Male and Mauna Loa as the female. The area between the mountains to be the birthing channel. It is very sacred to me.
__________________________________________________________
FACTORS OF CONCLUSIONS
THE UNITED STATES HAS NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO ASSERT ITS JURISDICTION IN THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM.
THE UNITED STATES GAVE MILITARY AND DIPLOMATIC SUPPORT TO THOSE ENGAGED IN THE ILLEGAL OVERTHROW OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM
THE LANDS OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM GOVERNMENT AND CROWN WERE ASSUMED BY THE REPUBLIC OF HAWAII, WHILE THE TITLE TO THOSE LANDS REMAIN IN THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM AND ARE REGISTERED IN THE BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES.
THERE WAS AN ILLEGAL ANNEXATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF HAWAII WHOM WERE NOT THE TITLE HOLDERS OF THE LANDS
THE ANNEXATION WAS DONE BY JOINT RESOLUTION AND WAS MADE WITH THE REPUBLIC OF HAWAII.
THERE IS NO TREATY OF ANNEXATION BETWEEN THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM OR EVEN THE REPUBLIC OF HAWAII
THE LANDS CEDED TO THE UNITED STATE BY THE REPUBLIC OF HAWAII WERE THE SEIZED PROPERTY OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM GOVERNMENT AND CROWN.
THROUGH THE ADMISSION ACT, THE CEDED LANDS WERE TO BE HELD IN TRUST BY THE STATE OF HAWAII
THE LEASED LANDS OF POHAKULOA ARE PART OF THE CEDED LANDS UNDER TRUST PROVISIONS AND NOT STATE OWNED LANDS
THE LAND CLASSIFICATION OF POHAKULOA IS CLASSIFIED AS CONSERVATION LAND
THE VERY PRESENCE OF THE US MILITARY IN HAWAII IS A VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAWS REGARDING “NEUTRALITY”
DATED THIS DAY: OCTOBER 14, 2020
// HANALEI FERGERSTROM
Replies