•                        POINTER'S FOR ALL KANAKA MAOLI
     
                                                              Allodial Lands - by Amelia Gora (2020)
    The following are important points which are Facts from the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/
    Ko Hawaii Pae Aina and not the Revised laws created by Aliens, usurpers, treasonous persons.
    The Royal government is the legitimate government documented U.S. President Cleveland who gave Hawaii back three times - in 1893, 1894, and 1897.
    There was no annexation....the State of Hawaii was made through the Executive Order of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
    Because there was No Annexation, that means the Aliens have No Jurisdiction.
    Because the Kamehameha's including our family's and myself, that means that the Treaty of 1850 continues on, is a permanent contract of amity and friendship. 
    Treaties are the supreme law of the land and even the Judges have to respect that.  See the U.S. Constitution of 1787 article 6.
    The following was posted on Facebook etc. for kanaka maoli, the true landowners with allodial/ forever titles gifted by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli:
    • Pointer's for all Kanaka Maoli
      1) The Royal Family - descendants of Kamehameha exists
      2) The Hawaiian Kingdom went underground see photo 3) Kamehameha III gave allodial lands to his people and fee simple or 30 year lease lands to Aliens - who could never own allodial titles
      No photo description available.
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 34m
    • badge icon
      this photo shows Kamehameha's grants; the 1850 Treaty, etc.
      No photo description available.
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 33m
    • badge icon
      Rule of law for the Hawaiian Kingdom which must also be respected because the 1850 Treaty is a permanent amity and friendship treaty
      4) the only players for the Treaty of 1850 is Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, his heirs and successors who are only Kamehameha's family - does not include "the people".....and the U.S. President Zachary Taylor ...
      5) Read the various laws which help all kanaka maoli in the HAWAIIAN REPORTS - read the rules of law Note: Important cases such as KEKIEKIE vs. DENNIS shows that no one can take your land from you; John Piikoi vs. Kapena case - the owners - Kapena - returned to the land, the Piikoi's were trying to adverse, then Kapena showed proof of his ownership and the case was removed from the court - etc. evidence of ownership shows up in Kalama vs. M. Kekuanaoa et. al. ----you must have the Royal Patent, LCA/Land Commission and Survey - the archives calls it the survey notes ---additional evidence such as your tutus testimonies are good background but the three (3) RP, LCA, and Survey is necessary, and know that the U.S. Constitution article 6 maintains that treaties are the supreme law of the land, and the judges have also recognize that ---now in this case if the judges go against Hawaiian Kingdom Law then file them on Police Reports because they are failing to follow the U.S. Constitution article 6....
      6) criminal Sanford B. Dole began his articles in 1874 talking about "the last of the Kamehameha's" criminally defrauding the Kamehameha's;
      7) there was No Annexation which means they have No Jurisdiction - evidence: Seizure of Hawaii article in 1969 - proof of fraud - google Seizure of Hawaii article posted by amelia gora or visit the iolani - the Royal Hawk website, etc. also, the U.S. Supreme Court Justices admitted there was No Annexation see Photo:
      Image may contain: text that says 'Sunday, March 2000 83 Justice memo shows U.S. never legally annexed Hawaii Steven Newcomb Goemans' about op-ed U.S. joint esolution annex 988 faith rather lezal acquire that annexation McKinies Hawair despite complicity, 893, whom may freely social, and eyond onthe principle Steven Newcomb Director Indigenous territory. Srudy Indigenous Politics'
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 13m
    • badge icon
      7) Read Dr. Alfred deZayas letters - former head of the UN Human Rights https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/.../dr-alfred... 8) google for Prof. Williamson Chang's pdfs about his research on No Annexation....importantly dezayas points out that the Hawaiian Kingdom exists..... came to this thread because my cousin Pua Gora, also a Kamehameha asked..........we have the bloodlines of Kamehameha through Kaoleioku; Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli; Kanekapolei (female) and Kalanihelemaiiluna, etc. ......our tutu Kalola (female) was documented next-of-kin to Bernice Pauahi Bishop who died in 1884...she and her husband Charles Reed Bishop were conspirators and treasonous persons.........the Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop called themselves the heirs when in reality they are a bunch of Pirates, pillagers, racketeers, genocide activists who can Never own allodial lands, are Not related to us and have been criminally deeding lands that they don't own to the U.S., Territory etc. ..... website: https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/ good luck! questions? theiolani@gmail.com or contact cousins Pua, et. als. 😉
      Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter to Routhe Bolomet - Important Keeper
      IOLANI-THEROYALHAWK.BLOGSPOT.COM
      Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter to Routhe Bolomet - Important Keeper
      Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter to Routhe Bolomet - Important Keeper
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 
        Remove Preview
      •  · 2m
    • Kamehameha Waltz
      YOUTUBE.COM
      Kamehameha Waltz
      Kamehameha Waltz
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 
        Remove Preview
      •  · 

        1m
  •  
  •                                              

Reference:

Facebook 

 

Aloha All!
Apparently, many seem confused as to the conditions of the "Kuleana Act" of 1850, so
hopefully We can clarify this for You? The "Kuleana Act" were Titles "already awarded"
long ago, by the King in Privy Council.
------------------------------------------------------
An Act confirming certain resolutions of the King and Privy Council passed on the 21st day of December 1849, granting to the common people allodial titles for their own lands and house lots, and certain other privileges.
Be it enacted by the Nobles and Representatives of the People of the Hawaiian Islands in Legislative Council assembled;
That the following sections which were passed by the King in Privy Council on the 21st day of December A.D. 1849 when the Legislature was not in session, be, and are hereby confirmed, and that certain other provisions be inserted, as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you will read the information listed below and transcribed by the "Hoakalei Foundation"
You will see the details of the conditions set forth in the Act. But You would have to get a Copy, if you do not have access to the One originally "issued" to your Ancestor, you will have to obtain it thru' the Mahele Buk or Records i believe they were included. If You are still uncertain of how to proceed or obtain the information try contacting the "Hoakalei Foundation" whom i have listed below? Tap onto the httpaddress i have included, or just copy and paste into your search bar, which will take you to their site to ask questions? They won't give you legal advice, but they should be able to direct you to where you can get a hold of your Ancestors Title, but you must still have it registered in the Land Court first, then take another Copy to begin your Case in Court. You cannot just "assume" you own the lands until a court has "determined" that You are the legal heirs, and have contacted the other family members about the suit. Without a Court Case? You cannot automatically assume that You are the only legitimate Heirs for the Lands. Just because You have been living on it. The Courts will still have to go thru' the process to determine who are the legitimate Heirs. Without an Actual Courts Document signed by the presiding Judge, you will not have a leg to stand on even in Court and the Police could remove you without Legal Papers. Remember, there are Hundreds of Heirs who may presume that the Lands are theirs? You need to be recognized by the Court, which will then clear the lands of those who should not be on the property. But just "Owning a Copy" doesn't make it "legitimate?" Anyone can order a Copy of a Land Title online....the Court needs to legitimize Your Copy.
Remember: Those Awards were given long, long ago. They Should be in the Name of Your Ancestor? There are also a lot of phony documents floating around that can be easily manufactured thru' the computer. Get Assistance from the "Legal Aid Society" available for free or reduced cost to those who cannot afford it?
Legal Aid Society of Hawaii
Call 808-536-4302

Monday-Friday
9:00-11:30 a.m.-1:00-3:30 p.m.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------for questions
on how to obtain Copies of the Documents try:

CONTACT US | HOAKALEI CULTURAL FOUNDATION

TAP ONTO THEIR SITE, AND INSERT "YOUR NEEDS"
DO THINGS "LEGALLY!" DO NOT FIGHT WITH YOUR FAMILIES OVER THIS?
ASK QUESTIONS FROM LEGAL AID, AND GET ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS FROM HOAKALEI? THEY OWN THIS SITE, SO I WOULD ASSUME THEY WOULD KNOW HOW YOU CAN ACCESS THE TITLES? CONTACT THEM! ALOHA! "Kamalii Wahine"
📷
📷
" width="18" />
" width="18" />
11RoandMo KahaiKaakimaka and 10 others
22 Comments
11 Shares
Like
Comment
Share

Comments

  • Can the State of Hawaii courts hear cases regarding the Hawaiian Kingdom title from the Mahele? This would seem like it would raise jurisdiction issues.
    • Like
    •  · 
      Reply
    •  · 1w
    Hide 11 Replies
    • Okole Maluna
       I agree why are we putting our right to be on family land in the hands of an illegal state? They are falsely enacting American laws not kingdom law
      " width="16" />
      4
      • Like
      •  · 
        Reply
      •  · 1w
    •  

You need to be a member of maoliworld to add comments!

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Tweet:

    amelia gora
    @hwnwahine
    Checking out "Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Pointer's For All Kanaka Maoli - Al" on Maoliworld:
    Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: Pointer's For All Kanaka Maoli - Allodial Lands - by Amelia Gora (2020)
                           POINTER'S FOR ALL KANAKA MAOLI                                                             Allodial Lands - by Amelia Gora (2020) Th…
    maoliworld.com
    View Tweet activity

    amelia gora
    @hwnwahine
    ·
    37s
    Replying to
    Hawaiian Music Hula: Weldon Kekauoha "Queenʻs Jubilee"
    A truly moving performance by Weldon Kekauoha of Queen Liliʻuokalaniʻs composition "Queenʻs Jubilee". Accompanied by the hula of Kumu Kapua Dalire-Moe and he...
    youtube.com

      • Before You jump nilly willy into the mire, with your Family's Lands? I suggest You "investigate" the legitimacy of the Groups Claims and their "success rate?" Too many People have fallen into this trap...and have lost their Mahele Lands because they listen without doing their "research?" How many Cases has this Group, Won? I have seen a few documented Cases, and so far, if there have been any "Wins?" I have not come across any? Until the International courts have deemed that Hawaii is no longer a part of the United States? Anyone who tries to go against the Laws of this State, will only end up on the losing end of the stick. Might as well just "let the others take it then?" The documents i have seen all show that the Victims either had to "go to jail" or....or the Judge "threw their cases out of the courts and deemed them: Dismissed with Prejudice. Which essentially means: -------------------
        🤓 Dismissal with Prejudice | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal ...
        When a lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice, the court is saying that it has made a final determination on the merits of the case, and that the plaintiff is therefore forbidden from filing another lawsuit based on the same grounds.
        -------------------------------------------------------------In other words...You Lose...and they don't want to hear about this case anymore. You are "forbidden" to bring it to the court after this.-----------------------------------
        So as i said...it is up to You who You follow? But You should really all investigate the "success rate" of the Choices that you make regarding the avenues to take? It's Your Lands....but if You don't make it "Legal?" The Police will not help you evict others from it? And You have just been "barred" from ever bringing it up into Court...anymore? You cannot just Wish Hawaii to not be a part of the United States anymore? It "happened." And until a Higher Authority like the International court has declared that Hawaii is no longer a part of the United States, You All Must Obey the Laws of the State. You are jumping ahead of the Game, Sort of like claiming your Girlfriend is Your Legal Wedded Wife, before going thru' the actual Ceremony and getting the Marriage certificate? It doesn't work that way in reality. And Who will be the "Loser" if You follow blindedly People who believe themselves to be the Authority here? I do believe that Someday, We will be Sovereign? But until that becomes a Reality thru' the proper channels...i suggest you follow the laws, and go thru' the legal processes. The courts are U.S. Courts. They only follow the U.S. Laws. Why risk everything for anothers "Assumptions?" The People who went against the Laws either lost their "Mahele Lands", or....ended up in jail because they follow "blindedly" those who have nothing to lose by giving this advice. How many Cases were actually "WON" thru this process? I saw the Court Documents. The Cases were all "thrown out of the Court?" If there were successes, i would like to genuinely see them, because i may have missed some...[.it's a possiblity.] But Our Family went thru' the Legal System so i know that these titles are legitimate, and even though we lost small portions, thru' legal loopholes? We had our days in Court and there are many portions left to challenge still. If i didn't go thru' the Courts, i wouldn't advise another to go that route? Its Your Lands......You want a shot at it, or you want to just "give it up?" Do Your Dilligence, and Investigate the Success Rate of the People who offer You to go against the System, because until i see some "Successful Wins" using the Sovereignty issue as my basis? I'd go the Lawful route. Until the Admissions Act of 1959 has been properly addressed and debated in the International courts, and deemed to be "UNJUST" and Hawaii becomes Separated from the United States? The U.S. Laws prevail here!
        --------------------------------------------------
        Hawaii Supreme Court rejects sovereignty defense
        Pictures Below [1 & 2] 🤓 🧐
        These are the "highlights" below in another column, so you can view it readily. And at the bottom of that column, you will see that the Judge has made his final comments. Although this is "not" a Land Issue here, it gives credence to the subject of Sovereignty and how it's being governed in the Courts.
        "However, the court makes clear that this
        political issue will have to be settled elsewhere." ------------------------------------------------------------In other words: Take it to the Higher Authorities? But until this has been "determined?" We all Must Obey the Laws of this United States! NO ONE HERE HAS THAT AUTHORITY TO OVERRULE THE ADMISSIONS ACT? UNTIL THAT HAS BEEN DETERMINED AND SETTLED BY AN INTERNATIONAL COURT PROBABLY, SINCE THEY DO SETTLE AGREEMENTS AND TREATIES BETWEEN TWO COUNTRIES.....AND UNTIL THAT HAPPENS! WE ALL MUST FOLLOW THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES. BECAUSE WE ARE A PART OF IT! DO NOT JUMP AHEAD OF THE GAME...YOU ARE COUNTING YOUR WINNINGS BEFORE YOU HAVE ACTUALLY "WON?"
        The Big Question here i might add is: Show Me the Cases that Were Actually WON using the Sovereignty Issue? I'd like to look them up to go over them....if they exist, and i merely "overlooked them?" If I am Wrong, then i will admit it...but if I AM RIGHT?
        Are You willing to just "throw your rights away?" Use the Laws to Work for You, instead of Against You? Educate....Read..what's Out There? Don't just follow without Asking Questions and Getting Answers? Look it up in Your Search Bar? The Answers are all on the Web.....Investigate the legitimacy of the Suggestions given?
        How many People are lying in the jail cells today, because of such "seemingly well-meaning attempts?" How many "loved ones" believed in these "well meaning Advisors" and ended up never having their day in court? USE THE LAWS TO WORK FOR YOU, INSTEAD OF GOING AGAINST THEM? ONLY "THEN....CAN YOU WIN GAINS?" THINK...DO YOUR INVESTIGATIONS ON THE LEGITIMACY OF THEIR ACTIONS. OR YOU WILL BE THE ONE TO LOSE YOUR PRECIOUS MAHELE LANDS...CHECK OUT YOUR SOURCES! WHO LOSES HERE? THEM....OR "Y-O-U?" They are U.S. Courts and they follow only U.S. Laws [Federal and State]. They don't follow Hawaiian Kingdom Laws? It hasn't been "established yet" that this is still the "Hawaiian Kingdom" and the Admissions Act and the Territorial "Organic Act" have not been deemed.... "invalid....Yet?"
        They are the Only Two Acts that made Us a viable part of the United States, an Equal State of the Union. The Annexation was nothing really, and merely made Us an "appendage of the U.S." because Our Government remained in force, and the U.S. Laws did not "transcend" to Hawaii. Until this has been determined and the Two Acts have been "challenged in the International Courts?" Nothing here changes....You are "jumping the gun." It "hasn't happened yet....
        Image may contain: text
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 1w
      • Kamalii Wahine
          I like the info you share but there is no "winning" in the US judicial system. The US courts simply have no jurisdiction to decide on our families royal patents. If you enter as Ko Hawaii Pae Aina and state your status as Ko Hawaii Pae… 
        See More
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 6d
        •  · 
          Edited
      • the Constitution of 1864 and the Session laws of the Legislative Assembly enacted since October 16, 1886, still remain in full force and have legal effect in the Hawaiian Kingdom until today. Article 78, of the Constitution of 1864, provides that all "… 
        See More
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 6d
      • Court case affirming continued existence of Hawaiian Kingdom. https://hawaiiankingdom.org/.../state-of-hawaii-judge.../
        State of Hawai‘i Judge Rules Hawaiian Kingdom Still Exists
        HAWAIIANKINGDOM.ORG
        State of Hawai‘i Judge Rules Hawaiian Kingdom Still Exists
        State of Hawai‘i Judge Rules Hawaiian Kingdom Still Exists
        • Like
        •  · 
          Reply
        •  · 6d
      •  
        • Explanation of the state of affairs.
          In 1988, when the United States Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, would stumble over this American dilemma in a memorandum opinion written for the Legal Advisor for the Department of State regarding legal issues raised by the proposed Presidential proclamation to extend the territorial sea from a three mile limit to twelve. After concluding that only the President and not the Congress possesses “the constitutional authority to assert either sovereignty over an extended territorial sea or jurisdiction over it under international law on behalf of the United States (p. 242),” the Office of Legal Counsel also concluded that it was “unclear which constitutional power Congress exercised when it acquired Hawaii by joint resolution. Accordingly, it is doubtful that the acquisition of Hawaii can serve as an appropriate precedent for a congressional assertion of sovereignty over an extended territorial sea (p. 262).”
          The opinion cited United States constitutional scholar Westel Woodbury Willoughby, The Constitutional Law of the United States, vol. 1, §239, 427 (2d ed.), who wrote in 1929, “The constitutionality of the annexation of Hawaii, by a simple legislative act, was strenuously contested at the time both in Congress and by the press. The right to annex by treaty was not denied, but it was denied that this might be done by a simple legislative act. …Only by means of treaties, it was asserted, can the relations between States be governed, for a legislative act is necessarily without extraterritorial force—confined in its operation to the territory of the State by whose legislature enacted it.” Nine years earlier in 1910, Willoughby, The Constitutional Law of the United States, vol. 1, §154, 345, wrote, “The incorporation of one sovereign State, such as was Hawaii prior to annexation, in the territory of another, is…essentially a matter falling within the domain of international relations, and, therefore, beyond the reach of legislative acts.”
          Since January 17, 1893, there have been no courts of competent jurisdiction in the Hawaiian Islands. Instead, genocide has taken place through denationalization whereby the national pattern of the United States has been unlawfully imposed in the territory of an occupied sovereign State in violation of international humanitarian law.
           
This reply was deleted.