I have a question, concerning this blood quantum issue. A person is deemed by those in the power positions,to be "Native Hawaiian" if they have 49%+ "Native Hawaiian" blood. Anyone with less than that amount is considered something else other than "Native Hawaiian". My question is this; what if a Maoli Hawai'i had children by a Maori Tahiti or a Maori Aotearoa, or Samoa, or even Tokelau ? They are all Maori, as Hawaiians are. As the Italians say "Una Cara, una raza " ( "Same face, same race" ). Shouldn't their offspring be considered Maoli ? If someone was less than the 49% "Native Hawaiian", and they had children by a Cook Islander, shouldn't the blood quantum be countred as higher ?
King Kalakaua, at one time wanted union with Samoa, and one of the reasons was to have a union of two Polynesian peoples. He also contemplated bringing in other Polynesian peoples to increase the numbers of Polynesians in Hawai'i.
I have my own opinions on this matter, but I am curious how others feel about this.
Mahalo for your mana'o on this subject.
Mahalo
Replies
Anthropologist Scientist Hal Hammet digs up graves based on Stand Deviations of "The question really relates to genetics, and DNA. It really boils down to is, does 1+1=2, or does it mean 1+1 =0.9999999999 ? " asked by Tama- aina -reo.
Every Sunday. 8:30 am
Really Kaohi, name calling ? Not a rational way to present an argument. If you don't agree with a statement, daemonise your your oppenent with epithets ? Shameful.
Let's stay on the shameful coefficient run on large number crunching to eternity of hell to come!
The sweet potato slide down Punchbowl hill is a far better talk for you--isn't it? Such as the Vietnam was founded upon!!!!
How stupid do you think we are?
If you want sweet potato to scratch your back and your olo's go to the streets where your kind prefer!!!!
How shameful that Hawaii legal age is 13 and the like of you want to turn our children in to porn stars, by looking at the numbers! Not sure if your large numbers include the coin toss of heads or tails.. Not sure if this is the monkey game or the head of ones dick!
Ask intelligent question and you have my attention--treat people like shit numbers and you got the pointer scoping out your tatau!!!!
It is a valid question. I would have liked an objective, rational answer to my question, rather than ones which are subjective and fraught with emotion. Though I concede, the question does invoke emotion. The question really relates to genetics, and DNA. It really boils down to is, does 1+1=2, or does it mean 1+1 =0.9999999999 ?
I do appreciate all of your replies. Mahalo
Tamaainareo,
Firstly, you are a lazy butt head playing a zero sum game with humanity! You want to crunch the numbers, randomly argue, and leave the act of reasoning to slaves! And you get pissed off, when we don't behave as such! Risk aversion seems more what you game is --so let's play it right! Changing the game rules to suit your outcome smells like one has pig shit between ones toes!
The speculative action on your part is to insight a bloody war by numbers, or lack of truth to it's cause. The attempt to obscure the the real issue with supposedly genetics only apply to those of us on the bloodquantum! Diggy dumb!
It does not apply to you or anyone that are not on the platform of the bloodquantum program!
Lazy people would rather use random sampling for their immediate profit return for speculative corporate gains. Like make a 'bundle' within a year! That puolo turns in a bag of 'iwi' for the Na Kanaka communities. All 51 communities will be at the effect of your assertion that all Pacific Islanders should live under the arm pits of US America and their army of soldiers. The percentages are much higher in human mortality count when one compares corporate gains and their end game!
Hi,
Beyond emotions, the term "Kanaka Maoli" was used in the 1890 Census or pre-premeditation of dethroning our Queen in 1893. The fact is that our ancestors said yes to the question 'are you a kanaka maoli'....the answer was either yes or no.
Thurston and the others, who were on their way to Washington - at the expense of the pre-approved travel expenses for five (5) who were supposed to represent the Hawaiian Kingdom btw ----the 5 were documented as "Native by birth" by the press/media.....reference: old articles of the period...see the newspapers in the U.S.
The Rice vs. Cayetano case became a political vehicle to legally "identity theft" of the Hawaiians.....those who are part of the Society, part of the bloodlines prior to the Captain Cook period.
DNA is a new defining scientific process and was not used in the period. I see no DNA in the above, but I see the legal terminologies (Hawaiian, Kanaka Maoli - the true bloods pre Capt. Cook period) used /abused over time with the results in eliminating the true peoples by an illegal occupier who did premeditate the dethronement of our Queen, treasonous to the Hawaiian Kingdom with the support of the U.S. government.....and whose baby, the State of Hawaii Government should legally be under the U.S. Embassy or the U.S. Consulate in the Hawaiian Islands.
aloha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McsWKczU6wc
p.s. we could also learn from other cultures/societies ----- the Samoan Islands and Aetearoa have treaties with the Hawaiian Kingdom and together we were called the Pacific Empire, a democratic group..... as for Tahiti, they were engaged with France.......
Mahalo, Amelia for your information.
Thanks to Sam Ohu, I found this song on Youtube:
Adeaze Live: Tongan and Samoan Mix
Before Adeaze started to sing these two beautiful songs, they talked about the relationship between Samoans and Tongans in the states. And how some of us dont like each other just because of what island we come from. They mixed these two songs to dedicate it to all the Samoan and Tongan brothers and sisters out there, in hope that they would put their differences aside and unite as one!
(song 1: E outa) Tongan
'E 'otua tataki au
fakaulo 'ae maama 'i hoku loto
pea ngaohi au koe fetu'u ngingila
ko koe 'ae malohi moe mafimafi
ko koe 'ae malohi moe mafimafi
(x2)
(song 2: E le alofa e) Samoan
E le alofa e moni lava e faigata
ua e tuu upu o le feagaiga
tau lava le pologa auauna faamaoni
A o lenei ua e tatala le upu moni
(X2)
Lau pele ea se'i tautino mai
Po'o ai ea ua sili i lau va'ai
pei o se ata ou foliga ua siomia ai na o ita
Good Grief good one, the whiteness of descendants is more like it!!! Which is typical of Will Hoover another white dude! Trying to make hay soup out of wishing and hoping by expanding ones dreams!!!!
Pretty good citation...! KKK hope to gain a copy and read the contents!
Posted on: Sunday, July 2, 2006
Walter Murray Gibson
By Will Hoover
Advertiser Staff Writer
Advertiser library photo
Walter Murray Gibson, a silver-tongued 19th-century adventurer, former Caribbean gunrunner and scoundrel of historic note, amassed great stature in the Hawaiian kingdom of the 1880s, rising to the post of premier and minister of foreign affairs in 1882.
By the time of King Kalakaua's reign, the clash between natives of full- or part-Hawaiian blood and non-Hawaiians, especially white or "haole" residents, had boiled over into political as well as racial rivalry.
With a native population previously isolated for centuries, foreign newcomers were able to grow in numbers and influence as Hawaiians were dying by the tens of thousands from diseases to which they had little resistance.
Gibson, a U.S. southerner of English ancestry who arrived in Honolulu in 1861, was able to exploit the tensions of the times to his own benefit — by siding with the royalists.
Three years after his arrival in the Islands, Gibson was excommunicated from the Mormon church for using church funds to take personal possession of half the island of Lana'i.
However, he was able to sidestep that problem and eventually take ownership of the leading newspaper, the Pacific Commercial Advertiser. Ultimately he was able to expand his political clout by clinging to the coattails of King Kalakaua.
Gibson's undoing came when he hatched a plan to form a federation of independent Polynesian island governments over which Kalakaua would be "emperor of the Pacific."
In 1887, after the "calabash empire" scheme fell through, revolutionary leaders deposed Gibson, who fled the Islands in fear of losing his life.
After his death in San Francisco in 1888, Gibson's body was returned to Hawai'i, where the enigmatic leader was afforded a lavish funeral attended by a large crowd of mourners.
Pretty good question(s). I like the bolohead questions that are seemingly numberreeh (%) and Pacific Islandish. I don't thing...bringing in other Polynesians in Hawai'i was Kalakauaian. Too much mouths to feed, secondly, need to know Na Kanaka was truly in breeding at that time with their own.
If other Polynesians wanted to come to Hawaii they came at the discretion of their chiefs as well as, what Mau's says, all are together in one canoe--therefore one would be in unity with all on board!
Micronesians were here in the 1800s and went home for their ancestors bones, and graves. My legal Micronesian ohana stayed in the islands and married many times over into the Hawaiian ohana--therefore they now live on Hawaiian Homesteads Papakolea, Waimanalo, and Waianae.
Unfortunately, the US 1700 Daws act which was intended to keep Native Americans from marrying into the white community is the bloodquantum problem that you are referring to. Which is a good thing...cause it ties into 200,000 acres and 40,000 thousand families on the wait list in 2012!
Thanks for asking these questions, I'm sure my father-in-law pure Sicilian would say differently! Trust me there was never the same same...