United Nations A/C.1/65/L.19
General Assembly Distr.: Limited
13 October 2010
Original: English
10-57940 (E) 151010
*1057940*
Sixty-fifth session
First Committee
Agenda item 97 (d)
General and complete disarmament: effects of the use of
armaments and ammunitions containing depleted uranium
Indonesia:* draft resolution
Effects of the use of armaments and ammunitions containing
depleted uranium
The General Assembly,
Guided by the purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United
Nations and the rules of humanitarian international law,
Recalling its resolutions 62/30 of 5 December 2007 and 63/54 of 2 December
2008,
Determined to promote multilateralism as an essential means to carry forward
negotiations on arms regulation and disarmament,
Taking note of the opinions expressed by Member States and relevant
international organizations on the effects of the use of armaments and ammunitions
containing depleted uranium, as reflected in the reports submitted by the Secretary-
General pursuant to resolutions 62/30 and 63/54,1
Recognizing the importance of implementing, as appropriate, the
recommendations by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations
Environmental Programme and the World Health Organization to mitigate potential
hazards to human beings and the environment from the contamination of territories
with depleted uranium residues,
Considering that studies conducted so far by relevant international
organizations have not provided a detailed enough account of the magnitude of the
potential long-term effects on human beings and the environment of the use of
armaments and ammunitions containing depleted uranium,
__________________
* On behalf of the States Members of the United Nations that are members of the Movement of
Non-Aligned Countries.
1 A/63/170 and Add.1 and A/65/129 and Add.1.
A/C.1/65/L.19
2 10-57940
Convinced that, as humankind becomes more aware of the need to take
immediate measures to protect the environment, any event that could jeopardize
such efforts requires urgent attention to implement the required measures,
Taking into consideration the potential harmful effects of the use of armaments
and ammunitions containing depleted uranium on human health and the
environment,
1. Expresses its appreciation to the Member States and international
organizations that submitted their views to the Secretary-General pursuant to
resolution 63/54;
2. Invites Member States and relevant international organizations,
particularly those that have not yet done so, to communicate to the Secretary-
General their views on the effects of the use of armaments and ammunitions
containing depleted uranium;
3. Requests the Secretary-General to request relevant international
organizations to update and complete, as appropriate, their studies and research on
the effects of the use of armaments and ammunitions containing depleted uranium
on human health and the environment;
4. Encourages Member States, particularly the affected States, as necessary,
to facilitate the studies and research referred to in paragraph 3 above;
5. Also encourages Member States to follow closely the development of the
studies and research referred to in paragraph 3 above;
6. Invites Member States that have used armaments and ammunitions
containing depleted uranium in armed conflicts to provide the relevant authorities of
affected States, upon request, with information, as detailed as possible, about the
location of the areas of use and the amounts used, with the objective of facilitating
the assessment of such areas;
7. Requests the Secretary-General to submit an updated report on this
subject to the General Assembly at its sixty-seventh session, reflecting the
information presented by Member States and relevant international organizations,
including the information presented pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3 above;
8. Decides to include in the provisional agenda of its sixty-seventh session
the item entitled “Effects of the use of armaments and ammunitions containing
depleted uranium”.
Replies
Need to read or skim through
The number of abstentions was down from previous years, with Belgium, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Greece, Luxembourg and Slovenia shifting position to vote in favour. It is notable that Bosnia had to wait six years for NATO to reveal that DU had been used there and even now there are contaminated sites in the vicinity of Sarajevo for which NATO has still failed to release data.
As with previous years, NATO was split on the issue with Belgium, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Slovenia and the Netherlands voting in favour, while Albania, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Turkey abstained.
Meanwhile Austria, Finland, Ireland, Malta and Switzerland all voted in favour while Sweden and Ukraine abstained.
In the Asia-Pacific region, ICBUW welcomed the ongoing support of Japan and New Zealand but was disappointed to see repeated abstentions from Australia and the Republic of Korea.
Elsewhere the abstentions from Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova and Russia, continued and ICBUW was disappointed that Albania, Macedonia and Croatia remained the only Balkan states not to support the draft.
"Overall we are pleased with the outcome of this vote," said an ICBUW spokesperson. "The text draws attention to a crucial issue that governs the humanitarian and environmental impact of uranium weapons - transparency. Nevertheless it is disappointing that many EU and NATO members who promote transparency in other areas of arms control are continuing to abstain. Similarly the US, France and UK's ongoing refusal to play a constructive role in these votes is depressing. The UK's position in particular is looking increasingly hypocritical, given that the text asks for less than they have already undertaken of their own volition in Iraq."
If your government has failed to vote in the way you would like, there is still time to lobby them before the General Assembly vote - although a shift in position is rare, it is not unprecedented. For advice on lobbying your government, contact ICBUW.
Most likely? What's the crazy age old factor? Ever since 1866 that get's pulled up when one wants to talk about Civil War in Hawaii? Yup you got it, Hawaiian Sexuality?
Mmmm--impeachment of the United States President?
Master the Hawaiian Sexuality and one can follow the trails of disbelief? Ask oneself --who is in control? Academics?
"Lilikala K. Kameʻeleihiwa is a Hawaiian artist and director and professor at the University of Hawaiʻi's Center for Hawaiian Studies. Her earliest work was published under the name of Lilikala L. Dorton.
Trained as a historian, she is also an expert in Hawaiian cultural traditions and in the issues driving the Hawaiian sovereignty movement. She served as a co-scriptwriter of the 1993 award winning documentary An Act of War: The Overthrow of the Hawaiian Nation.
Fluent in the Hawaiian language, she has served as protocol officer and crew for the double hulled Polynesian voyaging canoes Hōkūleʻa and Hawaiʻiloa, and has written the first year long course in traditional navigation offered at any university in the world. Since 1987, she has written another dozen courses in Hawaiian history, mythology and culture for the Center for Hawaiian Studies.
Currently, she is working on a book on Hawaiian sexuality as reflected in Hawaiian mythology, history, poetry and literature, wherein multiple partners, brother-sister mating, and bisexuality were considered a celebration of life."
Countries that said NO and there were four:
France
Israel
United Kingdom
United States
Countries that abstained
Albania
Andorra
Australia
Bulgaria
Canada
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Georgia
Hungary
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Latvia
Lithuania
Micronesia (FS)
Poland
Portugal
Re of Korea
Rep of Moldova
Romania
Russian Fed
Slovakia
Spain
Sweden
Thefyr Macidon
Turkey
Ukraine
Countries that did not respond:
October 28, 2010
Benin
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr Rep
Chad
China
Comoros
Dominica
Equat Gunea
Gambia
Honduras
Kiribati
Marshall Island
Mauritania
Monaco
Nauru
Niger
Palau
Rwanda
Saint Vincent-G
Sao Tome Princi
Seychelles
Somalia
Vanuatu