Enter Tom Lenchanko's Jurisdiction Challenge which can be added to Keanu Sai's Executive Agreements, and the Problematic Issues brought out in Land Court on What is the Hawaiian Government ----the State does not fall under this definition......then the issues of PREMEDITATION documented, the NEW YORK TIMES January 9, 1893 article and Tane's Turpie and the Facts that there was NO ANNEXATION documented by many shows a preponderance of evidence .......................aloha.
Thomas Joseph Lenchanko, Hawaiian National and Private Citizen
Spokesperson for Hawaiian Lineal Descendants
931 Uakanikoo Street
Wahiawa, Island of O’ahu
Ko Hawaii Pae Aina, H.I. (96786)
October 16, 2011
UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al
Department of the Army
United States Army Installation Management Command, Pacific Region
Headquarters, United States Army Garrison-Hawaii
851 Wright Avenue, Wheeler Army Airfield
Schofield Barracks Military Reservation, Hawaii 96587-5000
Helber, Hastert and Fee Planners, Inc.
Ronald A. Sato, AICP
733 Bishop Street, Suite 2590
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
STATE OF HAWAII, et al
Neil Abercrombie, Governor
State Capitol 5th floor
415 Beretania Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Department of Land and Natural Resources
William J. Aila, State Historic Preservation Officer
Charlene Unoki, Assistant Administrator, Land Division
PO Box 621
Honolulu, Hawaii 96809
Pua Aiu, Administrator, State Historic Preservation Division
Historic Preservation Division
Kakuhihewa Building
601 Kamokila Boulevard
Kapolei, Hawaii 96706
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA)
Colette Machado, Chairperson and the Board of Trustees
Clyde Namu’o, Chief Executive Officer
Esther P. Kia’aina, Chief Advocate and staff
711 Kapiolani Boulevard, Suite 500
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
LAWFUL NOTICE: TO CEASE AND DESIST UNLAWFUL ACTIONS BY THE FOREIGN
UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES ARMY,
de facto STATE OF HAWAII , de facto CITY AND COUNTY OF
HONOLULU, de facto COUNTY OF HAWAII, de facto COUNTY OF
MAUI and de facto COUNTY OF KAUAI, THEIR SUBORDINATE
ENTITIES, et al, including public and private parties acting in their
behalf, ON FORIEGN HAWAIIAN NATIONAL AINA IN CONFLICT WITH
RIGHTS AND IN OUTRIGHT DEFIANCE OF CUTURAL RIGHTS AND
PRACTICES OF HAWAIIAN NATIONALS;
DELIBERATE VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
“PROXMIRE ACT” “THE GENOCIDE CONVENTION IMPELMENTATION
ACT OF 1987” CHAPTER 50A OF THE UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE
18 SUB-SECTION 1091, MALICIOUS DESTRUCTION OF (TRADITONAL)
CULTURAL SITES (PROPERTIES) AND IWI SITES;
AND THE BLATANT VIOLATION OF THE “UNITED NATIONS GENOCIDE
CONVENTION OF 1948”...
REGARDING: CONFIRMATION OF AN UNBROKEN “CHAIN OF TITLE” AND LAWFUL
OWNERSHIP SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BACK TO THE ENACTMENT OF
“THE GREAT MAHELE” (PORTIONING, DIVISION) OF 1848;
ENDANGERED SPECIES MITIGATION PLAN, ENDANGERED SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN AND AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT
FOR THE SUBJECT AREA OF THIS FEDERAL UNDERTAKING...
Douglas S. Mulbury
Colonel, United States Army
Commanding
ho’ohewahewa mauliauhonua malama o pa ‘oe
Correspondence to compel your agents who have said responsibility, of their continued failure to
report to us directly, to reveal and affirm your organization’s alleged claim to own and/or control
as PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, our Hawaiian Kingdom
National Government lands throughout the Hawaiian Archipelago, Ko Hawaii Pae Aina, H.I. and
to prove transfer of “exclusive territorial jurisdiction” of said lands to any entity, for the sake of an
example, the United States Army, de facto State of Hawaii, their subordinate entities, et al, to
include public and private parties acting in their behalf.
WANT OF JURISDICTION OVER HAWAIIAN NATIONALS AND OUR AINA
JURISDICTION HAS NOT BEEN PROVEN IN THIS MATTER: The UNITED STATES FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT, et al, and the de facto STATE OF HAWAII, et al, has asserted by their actions
a questionable claim of jurisdiction which claim of jurisdiction has not been revealed or proven.
Jurisdiction over the land (in rem) and in personum (Private Citizen) must be proven in
writing, not just assumed, not just stated, and not just claimed without proof and written
evidence of law. Jurisdiction, when challenged as in this instant, must be responded to
IN WRITING AND PROVEN, AS REQUIRED BY LAW.
Judges of the de facto STATE OF HAWAII are jurisdictionally limited having taken an oath to
honor United States laws and the United States Constitution as United States “citizens”. That
being the case STATE judges must respect the following United States court determinations
regarding jurisdiction or face liability for fraud and personal abuse of law and justice.
Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be ‘assumed’. it must be proven to exist.
(Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 CA2d 751211 P2s 389);
Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided.
( Main v. Thiboutot, 100S. Ct.250);
The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and
all administrative proceedings. (Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533);
If any tribunal finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over person and subject matter, the case
must be dismissed, (Louisville R.R v. Motley, 211 U.S. 149, 29S. Ct. 42); et al.
As United States Commander on Hawaiian National soil, you are well aware and knowledgeable
of United States fact of law.
We await a lawful response to resolve and redress from all of the above named parties...
Truth is the highest goal and aloha is the greatest Truth of all... Halemakua
mauna ka’ala
‘a’e ku ua ‘a’e lakou i luna o kahi la’a
‘oia ua ‘ike a ‘aia la
Thomas Joseph Lenchanko, Hawaiian National
kahuaka’i ola ko laila waha olelo ‘Aha Kukaniloko/Koa Mana mea ola kanaka mauli
From: Ronald Sato [mailto:rsato@hhf.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 9:38 AM
To: tlenchanko1@hawaii.rr.com
Subject: ICSD Mt. Kaala Radio Facility Improvements - Section 106 Consultation
Aloha Mr. Lenchanko,
Enclosed for your organization’s review is a pdf file with Section 106 documentation supporting a “no historic properties affected” determination proposed at this time for this project.
A Draft Environmental Assessment for this project is being prepared and should be published next month for public review. This environmental document will also include this Section 106 information, and used to solicit comments from agencies and the general public under the Section 106 process.
If you would like a hard copy of this 106 documentation being emailed, please let me know what address to send it to, and we can mail a set. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact me at the address below.
Thanks
Ronald A. Sato, AICP
Associate
Helber Hastert & Fee Planners, Inc.
733 Bishop Street, Suite 2590
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
808.545.2055
www.hhf.com
Replies