Hawaiian Nationals.......what is this..............a newly concocted word to accommodate some?
overview by Amelia Gora (2013)
Let's look at the manipulation, maneuvering of the language used to identify our Hawaiian people.....those who lived here for 3-5,0000 years............
1758- Present
Terms used:
Natives
Kanaka Maoli - this term was used by Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III; and used in the 1890 Census in the Hawaiian Islands
Subjects - this term was used in our Monarchy form of Government
Native Hawaiian - this was used regularly by Queen Liliuokalani. Recently with the Rice vs. Cayetano case, this word was utilized by Americans and all born in the Hawaiian Islands to claim that they could use this and could be entitled to participate in lands, funds, monies belonging to the koko, blood lines of those who were here pre-Captain Cook period.
Rice v. Cayetano - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_v._CayetanoRice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000), was a case filed in 1996 by Big Island rancher Harold "Freddy" Rice against the state of Hawaii and argued before the ...
Rice v. Cayetano | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of ...
www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_818After Rice's application was denied, he sued Hawaiian Governor Benjamin J. Cayetano, claiming that the voting exclusion was invalid under the Fourteenth and ...RICE V. CAYETANO
by Supreme Court - 2000 - Cited by 765 - Related articles
Feb 23, 2000 – RICE V. CAYETANO (98-818) 528 U.S. 495 (2000) ... released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.Rice vs. Cayetano - Starbulletin.com
archives.starbulletin.com/2000/02/23/news/story1.htmlFeb 23, 2000 – The Rice vs. Cayetano decision of the U.S. Supreme Court can be viewed online through the Legal Information Institute Web site. The Internet ...- [PDF]
Rice V. Cayetano - Blog.hawaii.edu - University of Hawaii
blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/2011/11/APLPJ_03.2_trask.pdfFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
by MB Trask - Cited by 6 - Related articles
Rice v. Cayetano: Reaffirming the Racism of Hawaii's Colonial Past. Mililani B. Trask1. I. Posture of the Case. On February 23, 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court ...
For a group who declares that there was no Annexation...the following was posted......:
If Hawaii is a Fake State, the Hawaiian National group recognizes the Statehood Admissions Act under the following terms:
"Hawaii Statehood Admissions Act of March 18, 1959, Pub L 863, 73 Stat 4, Section 19, affirms, "Nothing contained in this Act shall operate to confer United States Nationality, nor to terminate nationality heretofore lawfully acquired of birth or naturalization to Ko Hawaii Pae Aina, or restore nationality heretofore lost under any law of the United States or under any Treaty to which the United States is or was a party".
Note: as for the Treaty, it has nothing to do with the people/subjects of the Hawaiian Kingdom because it was made only to the King, his descendants/heirs and successors and the President..............and NOT to the people, the subjects, the natives of the Hawaiian Islands.
See:
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~hslp/journal/vol1/1849_Treaty_(HJLP).pdf
Hawaii-United States Treaty -1849
www.hawaii-nation.org/treaty1849.htmlUS TREATY WITH THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, DEC. 20, 1849. Treaty signed at Washington December 20, 1849. Senate advice and consent to ratification ...Hawaiian Kingdom - International Treaties
www.hawaiiankingdom.org/treaties.shtmlThe Hawaiian delegation, while in the United States of America, secured the ... ofHawaiian independence the Hawaiian Kingdom entered into treaties with the ...You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 8/29/12Search Results - Search Maoliworld - Maoliworld
maoliworld.com/main/search/search?q=Search+Maoliworld...3Comment on: Topic 'Perpetual Friendship Treaty(ies) With the U.S. In Place ... 6)Half of the ahupuaa was under the Hawaiian Government, which is NOT . ...... Perpetual Friendship 1849 Treaty which locks in the 1849 U.S. Constitution as well.You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 7/31/12
The following was sent out by Pilipo:
Fw: KU'E! Hawaiian Nationals resolution hearing 02-13-13
Inbox
|
x |
|
8:55 PM (22 hours ago)
|
|||
|
A KU’E opportunity...
Please SUPPORT the resolution RECOGNIZING that HAWAIIAN NATIONALS still exist!
State Representative Faye Hanohano introduced House Resolution 23 (HR23) in the State Legislature, “Recognizing Hawaiian Nationals as a population residing lawfully in the Hawaiian Islands.” It needs your SUPPORT to pass.
The first hearing of HR23 is scheduled for:
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:50AM
State Capitol conference room 325
before the House OMH Committee (Ocean Marine Resources & Hawaiian Affairs) chaired by Rep. Hanohano
The text of HR23 is attached, or can be found at:http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/bills/HR23_.htm
The hearing notice, along with links to submit testimony, is at: http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/hearingnotices/HEARING_OMH-WAL_02-13-13_2_.HTM
This is a simple, common sense resolution that should be supported not only by Hawaiian Nationals, but by anyone who cares about stopping oppression and discrimination on the basis of nationality. Think about HR23 as a way to add our voice Ku’e to the petitions of our kupuna.
If HR23 passes, it will effectively protect Hawaiian Nationals from the current nationality-based discrimination and mistreatment by government and other interests operating in Hawaii. In essence it says, Hawaiian Nationals belong here; there is nothing wrong with being a Hawaiian National; so stop treating Hawaiian Nationals as if we are illegal aliens.
GET READY!
Prepare a short and sweet testimony about why youSUPPORT the State of Hawaii recognition of Hawaiian Nationals “as a population residing lawfully in the Hawaiian Islands” and submit your written testimony 24 hours before the Wednesday hearing.
ALSO, please make an effort to attend the hearing on Wednesday so you can give your testimony in person. Often they will allow on-the-spot oral testimonies even if you haven’t made a prior submission in writing.
Mahalo nui loa,
Leon
Replies
Los Angeles herald. (Los Angeles [Calif.]) 1890-1893, February 10, 1892, Image 1
Image provided by University of California, Riverside; Riverside, CA
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn84025968/1892-02-10/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZpEM6__d_E
JUST FOUND THIS ......The National was one of three parties:
The Nationalists is a NON-Hawaiian /NON Kanaka Maoli issue:
Los Angeles herald. (Los Angeles [Calif.]) 1890-1893, February 10, 1892, Image 1
Image provided by University of California, Riverside; Riverside, CA
Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn84025968/1892-02-10/ed-1/s...
Print this image | Download this image
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm1WOqex8jE