THE LAWS AND TREATIES OF The Kingdom of Hawaii (Since 350 A.D.) THE LAWS AND TREATIES OF The Kingdom of Hawaii, the ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions) THE LAWS AND TREATIES OF The Kingdom of Hawaii With FINDINGS/ EVIDENCE of U.S. Conspiracies, etc. AFFECTING HAWAII AND THE WORLD TODAY (350 A.D. – 2005) by Amelia Kuulei Gora, one of Kamehameha’s descendants, a Royal person not subject to the laws (2005)
THE LAWS AND TREATIES OF The Kingdom of Hawaii (Since 350 A.D.) THE LAWS AND TREATIES OF The Kingdom of Hawaii, the ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions) THE LAWS AND TREATIES OF The Kingdom of Hawaii With FINDINGS/ EVIDENCE of U.S. Conspiracies, etc. AFFECTING HAWAII AND THE WORLD TODAY (350 A.D. – 2010) by Amelia Kuulei Gora, one of Kamehameha’s descendants, a Royal person not subject to the laws (2005)(revised 2010)
INTRODUCTION
The Kingdom of Hawaii became suppressed after the wrongful, criminal dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani. Fortunately, she left documentation that the U.S. Breached the Law of Nations, an ‘entity’ dethroned her, an ‘entity’ which was neither de facto nor de jure, she named the conspirators/Terrorists, and she stated that she did not sign a deed of Trust, but signed a Will.
The following has been prepared to provide the reader with a glimpse into: (1) the Kingdom of Hawaii’s laws and Treaties. (2) the Kingdom of Hawaii’s laws and Treaties, the ‘entity’ lawless group, turned Republic of Hawaii – self proclaimed group, turned into a Territory of Hawaii and State of Hawaii (with Oppositions documented). (3) The Kingdom of Hawaii’s laws and Treaties, with the conspirators/ Terrorists issues – with documented issues of Conspiracies, etc. –
Overview.
This has been set up like a skelton. The first part represents the skeleton, the naao/the primary organs, heart – lungs- kidneys – liver – brain, muscle, the endoderm and the mesoderm necessary. The second part provides the outside skin, the epiderm, the outside, superficial layer which is aided by bandaids (namely the U.S.) for assistance. The third part represents the natural growing skin belonging to the first part, providing a natural layer to the skelton making up a full body.
This part, aided with all the skills of the ages, comes into play. This part represents the truth and all that is good for the skeleton, it’s important parts and its’ function. As we all know, the bandaid approach is not the solution because under the bandaid, there is an enormous problem that will not go away. Bandaids are easy to pass around, but spreading oneself thinly around the world leads to unhealed tissues, and issues exposing TRUTH, which is what this exposes to everyone. The FACTS remain “Hawaii and the United States were separate and independent nations prior to July 7, 1898.”
Kamehameha descendants exist, Royal persons subject to the laws existed then and now. Conspiracies with Evidence are now documented. Aloha.
THE LAWS AND TREATIES OF The Kingdom of Hawaii (350 A.D. – 1893) KE KANAWAI O Hawaii
1. Private Laws. Hawaiian Islands, the Hawaiian archipelago is more than 1,650+ years old. Our ancient society continued under the kapu, a Private system based on genealogies.
2. He Olelo No Ke Kanawai – 1827. The words of the Law(s) – 1827.
Ke hai aku nei makou I ka olelo, e hoolohe mai, e ko keia aina, a me ko, keia aina, e malama no hoi ko keia aina, a me ko kela aina o ka mea I lohe I keia mau olelo, e malama ia; aka I malama ole e hewa ia.
Now our words, come listen, of this land, and with _, this land, take care the return of the land, and that land, etc. _ these words, take care of; and that there is no wrongdoing.
I Ke papa aku nei makou I ka pepehi kanaka; mai pepehi kela aina maenei, mai pepehi keia aina maenei; o ka mea, e pepehi maenei e make ia, I ke kaawe ia.
II Eia ka lua; ke papa aku nei makou I ka aihue; o ka mea e aihue, e paa ia I ka hao.
III Eia ke kolu: ke papa aku nei makou I ke kuai rama maenei: o ka mea e kuai rama, e paa ia I ka hao.
IV Eia ka ha; ke papa aku nei makou I ka hookamakama: ka mea I hookamakama, e uku ia oia I ke kala. .
V Eia ka lima: ke papa aku nei makou, I ka pili waiwai; o ka mea e pili waiwai e uku ia oia I ka hao.
KING KAUIKEAOULI. Oahu Honolulu, Dekemaba 8, 1827.
3. Declaration of Rights – June 7, 1839. This was written by Boaz Mahune, a ‘cousin’ of Kamehameha III.
4. Constitution of 1840.
5. Organic Act of 1845.
6. Great Mahele 1848.
7. Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation, December 20, 1849.
8. Ratification of Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation, August 24, 1850.
9. Penal Code of 1850.
10. Government and Konohiki Land Commutation Waiver 1850.
11. Constitution of 1852.
12. Civil Code 1859
13. Constitution of 1864
14. Reciprocity Treaty of 1875
15. Compiled Laws of 1884
16. Constitution of 1886 – The ‘Bayonnet Constitution’
17. Constitution of 1893
18. Proclamation by the Entity/ Conspirators/Terrorists who wrongfully dethroned Hawaii’s Queen Liliuokalani – 1893.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
2010 Update: Conspiracies on the part of the U.S., Bankers, PIRATES OF THE PACIFIC: Charles Reed Bishop and Friends has been found.
Premeditation of the criminal dethronement has been documented (see the multiples of evidence found by researchers Shane Lee, Kiliwehi Kekumano, and many others including myself.
The evidence has been posted for the World to see since 1996. More evidence has been uncovered and posted over time, and continues.
see the following websites: http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037 www.theiolani.blogspot.com www.myspace.com/hwn_wahine www.maoliworld.com see forums posts by Amelia Gora, etc.
see articles, books written by Amelia Gora.
19. Declaration of the Entity/Conspirators/Terrorists to be the Republic of Hawaii – 1894 – July 4, 1894.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
20. Treaty of Annexation introduced 1897 – June 16, 1897
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
21. Queen Liliuokalani’s Opposition to the Treaty of Annexation – 1897 – June 17, 1897.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
22. Queen Liliuokalani’s 40,000 Supporter’s Opposition to the Treaty of Annexation – 1897.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
23. Joint Resolution of Congress of 1898 – July 7, 1898
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
24. Annexation Treaty – 1898
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
25. Statehood of Hawaii – Executive Order by U.S. President Eisenhower – 1959.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
26. Kamehameha’s descendant, Harold Abel Cathcart, Opposition to Statehood – 1963.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
27. Public Law 103-150, 103d Congress, to acknowledge the 100th anniversary of the January 17, 1893 ‘overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom’ etc – 1993.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
28. Affidavit/Lien No. 96-177455 filed on 12/17/96 (281 pages) filed at the Bureau of Conveyances, Honolulu, Hawaii with issues of ownership of Hawaii’s lands, 133 islands; conspiracies/piracies discovered – examples, Pacific Cable Co.; genealogies; Queen Liliuokalani’s claim that she did not sign a Trust deed, etc.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
29. Jurisdiction not granted to the U.S., the State; the City and County(ies) governments in Hawaii, including the coral reefs, islands, islets in Letters to the U.S. Presidents Clinton and GW Bush – 2003 – present.
Note: Kamehameha’s descendants exist. It is not our problem that the U.S. backed or assisted documented conspirators/Terrorists in Hawaii.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
30. Oppositions to the ‘A kaka’ – Daniel Akaka and Daniel Inouye’s Bill seeking to set up a native Hawaiian government, likened to the American Indians, destroy all the Kingdom of Hawaii records, transfer all the lands to the United States government and imprison researchers – 2001 to present.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
2010 Update: Daniel Akaka is a direct descendant of Thomas Akaka, one of the planners/conspirator’s/treasonous persons who aided in dethroning our Queen since 1892 and documented in Washington, D.C.
At present, his descendant Daniel Akaka criminally pushes for the Akaka Bill and perpetuates the crimes of his ancestor.
31. Proclamation by the Entity/ Conspirators/Terrorists who wrongfully dethroned Hawaii’s Queen Liliuokalani – 1893.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
32. Declaration of the Entity/Conspirators/Terrorists to be the Republic of Hawaii – 1894 – July 4, 1894.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
33. Treaty of Annexation introduced 1897 – June 16, 1897
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
34. Queen Liliuokalani’s Opposition to the Treaty of Annexation – 1897 – June 17, 1897.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
35. Queen Liliuokalani’s 40,000 Supporter’s Opposition to the Treaty of Annexation – 1897.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
36. Joint Resolution of Congress of 1898 – July 7, 1898
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
37. Annexation Treaty – 1898
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
“The Supreme Court wrote “the governmental lands of Hawaii…passed to the United States by the Joint Resolution of Congress of July 7, 1898, which annexed Hawaii to the United States and accepted for the United States all public, Government or Crown lands and all other public property then belonging to the Republic of Hawaii.” Id., at 259.
2010 Update: See testimonies, research of Law Professor and Attorney Williamson Chang.
Admission of wrongdoing has been recorded and cannot be negated.
38. 1900 Organic Act:
The 1900 Organic Act provides at section two that: “That the islands acquired by the United States of America under an Act of Congress entitled “Joint Resolution to provide for annexing the Hawaiian Islands to the United States,” approved July seventh, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight shall be known as the Territory of Hawaii.” “As noted above, the United States Supreme Court found in Fullard-Leo (case) that the United States acquired all property of the Republic of Hawaii by the Joint Resolution.
It wrote “Hawaii has been a territory of the United States since the Joint Resolution of Annexation of July 7, 1898.” 331 U.S. at 265.
It cited Senate Doc. 16, 55th Congress, 3d Session, 1898, which listed Oahu as one of the Hawaiian islands acquired by the United States in 1898.
“The Supreme Court also cited Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197 (1903). There, the United States Supreme Court upheld a manslaughter conviction by a less than unaminous jury verdict under the laws of the Republic of Hawaii. But in so doing, the Supreme Court clearly recognized that Hawaii was annexed to the United States in 1898.
“In Mankichi, the issue was whether United States laws and constitutional provisions automatically and instantly became applicable to Hawaii by virtue of the 1898 Joint Resolution, 190 U.S. at 212, or whether those laws and constitutional provisions did not become applicable until Congress affirmatively extended the laws of the United States to Hawaii by the 1900 Organic Act, Id., at 215.
The Supreme Court found the latter. Id. Republic of Hawaii laws continued to apply to the Territory of Hawaii during the transitional period between the 1898 annexation and the 1900 Organic Act.”
“However, the Supreme Court recognized that the “main objects of the (1898) resolution were, 1st, to accept the cession of the islands theretofore made by the Republic of Hawaii, and to annex the same ‘as a part of the territory of the United States and subject to the sovereign dominion thereof…’” 190 U.S. at 214.
“Judge King correctly held that all of Kahoolawe except for the lighthouse portion was sufficiently under Government control. Apparently recognizing that on their face these documents provide sufficient Government control, the defendants first argue that at least the 1898 and 1900 agreements were invalid because they were made by “illegal revolutionaries.”
In light of Congress’ recognition of the government of the Republic of Hawaii as the established government, the acceptance of the validity of the transfer agreements by both the United States and Hawaiian Supreme Courts (see United States v. fullard-Leo), 331 U.S. 256, 270, 67 S. Ct. 1287, 91 L.Ed. 1474; Bishop v. Mahiko, 35 Hawaii 608 (1940), and the failure of defendants to make a record on this argument below, we reject this challenge as frivolous.”
“In United States v. Mowat, 582 F. 2d 1194, 1206-07 (9th Cir. 1978). “Territorial Supreme Court cases also rejected challenge to the jurisdiction of legitimate successors to the Kingdom of Hawaii. In Territory v. Kapiolani Estate, 18 Haw. 643 (1908), the Hawaii Supreme Court first addressed the legitimacy of government-owned land after the 1893 overthrow.
2010 Update: Opposition to the Princes Kuhio and Kawananakoa was recorded by Queen Kapiolani who also maintained the lands of her sister Princess Poomaikelani.
The Princes were told to file the deed of conveyance AFTER her death, instead they filed it upon receiving it.
Queen Kapiolani recorded her Opposition and nulled and voided the deed.
The usurpers Courts supported the Princes filings.
It was after Queen Liliuokalani’s death that Prince Kuhio took an out-of-court settlement to the claims of Queen Liliuokalani maintaining that she did not sign a Trust deed with the criminal deviants: Smith, Iaukea, and Damon (who replace Cleghorn).
Prince Kuhio received property in Waikiki for his claim and signed documents which declared he gave up claims to the throne.
additional note: Queen Kapiolani was the hanai/adopted daughter of Kaluakini, my great grandfather. In other words, Queen Kapiolani was the sister of my grandmother.
Princess Poomaikelani was my great great grandmother. Years of research has resulted in finding the evidence.
Princess Poomaikelani was my grandmother’s own grandmother.
Princess Poomaikelani was said to be the daughter of Kaeha/ Kamakaeha/Namakaeha/Liliuokalani/Queen Liliuokalani. The Queen actually had many whom she called her children:
Abigail/Princess Poomaikelani
Kema (male)
Wahie (male)
Kamukai (male)
Kaeha opio (female)
Luka (female)
Pau (male)
Ioane (male)
and others
The Hawaii Supreme Court said: “The law(Sec. 272 R.L.) places with the commissioner of public lands the general supervision of all public land which was ceded to the United States by the Republic of Hawaii, which included (Sec. 99 Org. Act) the “portion of the public domain heretofore known as crown land.” Id., 18 Haw. At 644.”
“In Kapiolani Estate, the territorial land commissioner had brought an action in the name of the Territory to recover possession of government land that had been leased and upon which the rent was in arrears.
The Hawaii Supreme Court ruled: “As above stated, it was unnecessary to aver the title of the territory in that portion of the public lands which at the date of the lease were known as crown lands since judicial notice is taken that by Art. 95 of the constitution of the Republic of Hawaii the crown lands were declared to be the property of the Hawaiian government and that by the public land act of 1895 those lands as part of the public domain were placed under the management of the commissioner of public lands, a title which was recognized by the joint resolution of annexation, the lands having been ceded by the Republic of Hawaii to, and accepted by, the United States, and also recognized by the organic act (Sec. 83) in continuing in force the land laws of the Republic of Hawaii, and (Sec. 99) declaring that the crown lands on August 12, 1898, were, and prior thereto, had been, the property of the Hawaiian government. The validity of the declaration in the constitution of the Republic of Hawaii, under which the present title is derived, does not present a judicial question.
Even assuming, but in no way admitting, that the constitutional declaration was confiscatory in nature, this court has no authority to declare it to be invalid.
The subsequent derivation of the title by the United States, as above stated, is clear.”
“The position here taken in refusing to regard the defendant’s claim is otherwise than as fixed by constitutional law as presenting a judicial question is well illustrated in numerous decisions of the United States supreme court.” Id., 18 Haw. At 645-46, citing Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet. 253, 256; Williams v Suffolk Ins. Co., 13 Pet. 414, 420; Luther v Borden, 7 Haw. 1, 41, 56; Jones v. U.S., 137 U.S. 80, 82; McCray v U.S., 195 U.S. 27, 54; Wilson v. Shaw, 204 U.S. 24.”
“Later, in Territory v Puahi, 18 Haw. 649 (1908), the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that the question of whether Section 95 of the constitution of the Republic of Hawaii violated the United States Constitution was not a judicial question.
Section 95 had declared the former crown lands to be the land of the Hawaiian government. It is by now clear that: “Upon the adoption of the Newlands Resolution (30 Stat. L. 750, Resolution No. 55, adopted July 7, 1898) and the transfer to the United States of the Hawaiian Islands the entire dominion and sovereignty, national and territory vested in the United States….
Every nation acquiring territory by treaty or otherwise holds the acquired territory subject to the constitution and laws of its own government and not according to those of the government ceding it.” Bishop v. Mahiko, 35 Haw. 608, 649 (1940).
Reference: First Circuit Court Case Civil No. 98-0559-02 (Condemnation) State of Hawaii, by its Attorney General vs. Richard Sung Hong Wong, Oswald Kofoad Stender, Marion Mae Lokelani Lindsey, Gerard Aulama Jervis, and Henry Haalilio Peters, Trustees of Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estate; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Hawaii Kai Development Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
FACTS FOUND: Researchers Rachel (husband Merle) Painter and their attorney Williamson B.C. Chang, University of Hawaii Law School Professor and legal researcher, claimed that “the boundaries of the State do not include that island (Oahu). Said island was excluded by the Act of Admission, Section Two.”
“Section Two of Public Law 86-3 applies plainly to deny this court of jurisdiction over the res.
Section Two states: “Section Two: The State of Hawaii shall consist of all the islands, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters, included in the Territory of hawaii on the date of enactment of this Act, except the atoll known a Palmyra Island, together with its appurtenant reefs and territorial waters, but said State shall not be deemed to include the Midway Islands, Johnston Island, Sand Island (off shore from Johnston Island, or Kingman Reef, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters.”
“Public Law 86-3 is the Act of Admission, the Act of Congress by which Hawaii was admitted as a State.
Section Two of that Act defines the area of the State to be those islands which were acquired by the Joint Resolution (30 Stat 750) an Act of Congress.
Hawaii and the United States were separate and independent nations prior to July 7, 1898.
This Court may take judicial notice of that fact.
No act of Congress, no Act of the Congress of the United States, no act of any Congress in the world can, without more, result in the incorporation of the territory of another nation.
”(see Reference (1)) Reference (1): See Exchange of remarks, Senators Allen and Stewart, 55th Cong. 2d Session. 31 cong. Rec. 6369 (Senator Stewart taking the position that the resolution was mere “puffing,” in that the United States can “annex the world” if Congress so chose.)
No nation has that power and not nation ever will have that power. Equally true, no nation can suffer the loss of its lands by “joint resolution.”
It is not simply an illegal act – it is an impossible act.
See Statement of Senator Foraker admitting Joint Resolution cannot annex Hawaii. 55th Cong. 2d Sess. 31 Cong. Rec. 6585.
“So said the Supreme Court in Kalb v Feuerstein, 308 U.S. 433 (1940.(See Reference (2) The terms of Public Law 86-3 divests this Court of power.
Section Two is plain on its face.
The legislative history is more than clear: Congress deliberately sought to deny the Courts of the State of Hawaii in rem jurisdiction. (See reference 3)
Public Law 86-3 is the sole basis by which this Court derives its very existence, let alone its powers.
Reference (2): “In Kalb, appelants were ejected from their farm. Later, they brought an action in equity in the Circuit Court of Walworth County, Wisconsin, against the mortgagees, who had purchased at the sheriff’s sale, The appellants, farmers, sought restoration of possession, the cancellation of the sheriff’s deed and for removal of the mortgagees. Appellants had filed in the bankruptcy court for an extension of time to pay, under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, (Frazier-Lemke).
Nevertheless, the County Court granted the motion for confirmation of the sheriff’s sale and denied a stay. The mortgagees acquired the property by sale. The mortgagees ejected the appellants pursuant to a writ of execution.”
“The issue was whether the County Court had jurisdiction. The confirmation of sale and ejectment took place while the petition was pending in the bankruptcy court.
On appeal, the Wisconsin Supreme Court stated: “It is the contention of the plaintiff that this statute is self-executing,….”.
Appellants had not applied for a stay in the County Court. The Supreme Court posed the issue as whether or not the Frazier-Lemke Act was self-executing, providing for a statutory, not a judicial stay. The Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that the Frazier-Lemke did not impose an automatic stay and thereby terminate the jurisdiction of the state court. Thus, the ejectment was not in violation of the law.”
“The Supreme Court of the United States reversed. The Supreme Court deemed this an issue of power, of jurisdiction. The county court had jurisdiction over foreclosures in general. Nevertheless, then by its terms the Frazier-Lemke Act automatically divested the County Court of jurisdiction once a petition was filed. The County Court was stayed whether or not the appellants filed for such a stay in that court.
The effect of the federal law as automatic-not resting upon the affirmative act of the appellant. The appellant was not required to file to benefit from the stay.”
“The principle in Kalb applies to the instant case. This Court is divested of in rem power by act of Congress. As in Kalb, it was the intent of Congress to deny this Court any power incident to in rem jurisdiction, whether eminent domain, the power to confirm a sale, to issue a writ of execution, or to quiet title.
” Reference (3): “Leaders of both the Republic of Hawaii and the Untied States were well aware of this fact.
See Correspondence of Sanford Dole, President of Hawaii to A. Hartwell, dated November 15, 1899 from the State Archives of Hawaii (“A reference to the joint reolution of annexation and the treaty shows clearly the untenable position of the President’s order in that it attempts to affect land transfers made between July 7, and August 12, 1898; for the treaty by Article 1st agrees that the hawaiian Islands be annexed to the United State under the name of the Territory of Hawaii;”) the joint resolution changes this in a most radical way in the first paragraph by annexing the Hawaiian islands “as a part of the territory of the United States.”
The Treaty agreement having been departed from in this important particular by the joint resolution, it cannot be of course contended that the letter has an authority in relations to the Hawaiian Islands until it was accepted by us which acceptance took place on the 12th of August 1898.”
The protracted debate over the Joint Resolution had brought this fact to public attention.
No one claimed that Congress had power beyond the boundaries of the United States.”
Reference: First Circuit Court Case Civil No. 98-0559-02 (Condemnation) State of Hawaii, by its Attorney General vs. Richard Sung Hong Wong, Oswald Kofoad Stender, Marion Mae Lokelani Lindsey, Gerard Aulama Jervis, and Henry Haalilio Peters, Trustees of Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estate; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Hawaii Kai Development Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
Note: Williamson B.C. Chang, University of Hawaii Professor, attorney, legal researcher is pono/good.
He was ridiculed by Federal Judge Ezra in the past, and lost his assets helping other aboriginal Hawaiians in the past.
Other researchers and I had at one time organized to do legal research, other research, and applied for grants.
Unfortunately, the plans fell through and we went our separate ways.
Thanks to his intensive, extensive research, the outcome shows that Professor Chang put the Court on notice when he documented
“Hawaii and the United States were separate and independent nations prior to July 7, 1898.
This Court may take judicial notice of that fact. No act of Congress, no Act of the Congress of the United States, no act of any Congress in the world can, without more, result in the incorporation of the territory of another nation.”
Additionally, in Reference (1): “No nation has that power (to annex) and no nation ever will have that power. Equally true, no nation can suffer the loss of its lands by “joint resolution.”
“It is simply an illegal act – it is an impossible act.”
Lastly, in Reference (2): The issue of terminating “the jurisdiction of the state court” is possible.
Comment: Terminating “the jurisdiction of the state court, etc.” could be stated in an alternate fashion, “jurisdiction not granted”, a message which was sent out to the Courts, the Governor, Mayor(s), and U.S. President’s Clinton and Bush also via Senators Daniel Akaka, and Daniel Inouye time and time again (Certified/Registered Mailings, letters, personal visits to their offices, and e-mails).
39. 1959 Admissions Act. Statehood of Hawaii – 1959 and Executive Order by U.S. President Eisenhower.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
The State of Hawaii Attorney General claimed as follows:
“The 1959 Admission Act provides, at section two, that: The State of Hawaii shall consist of all the islands, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters, included in the Territory of Hawaii on the date of enactment of this Act, except the atoll known as Palmyra Island, together with its appurtenant reefs and territorial waters, but said State shall not be deemed to include the Midway Islands, Johnston Island, Sand Island (off shore from Johnston Island), or Kingman Reef, together with their appurtenant reefs and territorial waters.”
“The validity of the Joint Resolution, Organic Act, and Admission Act have been judicially attacked before. None of these attacks have ever succeeded.”
Reference: First Circuit Court Case Civil No. 98-0559-02 (Condemnation) State of Hawaii, by its Attorney General vs. Richard Sung Hong Wong, Oswald Kofoad Stender, Marion Mae Lokelani Lindsey, Gerard Aulama Jervis, and Henry Haalilio Peters, Trustees of Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estate; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Hawaii Kai Development Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
FACTS FOUND:
40. Kamehameha’s descendant, Harold Abel Cathcart, Opposition to Statehood – 1963.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
One of Kamehameha’s descendants, Harold Abel Cathcart documented that he had Opposed Statehood, given notice to Judge King and documented the facts in his Court papers.
2010 Update: Harold Abel Cathcart was a first cousin of my great grandmother Mele Kauweloa. He visited my great grandmother to discuss genealogies according to our family history.
The following was recorded on his Court documents: Cathcarts documents were also filed in the Affidavit/Lien No. 96-177455 on 12/17/96 (281 pages) at the Bureau of Conveyances on 12/17/96 (filer: Amelia Kuulei Gora, address, Mililani, Hawaii 96789)
41. Public Law 103-150, 103d Congress, to acknowledge the 100th anniversary of the January 17, 1893 ‘overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom’ etc – 1993.
U.S. President William Clinton signed this Joint Resolution with a disclaimer: “Nothing in this Joint Resolution is intended to serve as a settlement of any claims against the United States.”
Approved: November 23, 1993.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
FACTS FOUND: Former Governor Waihee was employed by the group who wrote up the Public Law 103-150.
The Claimed Facts in the Public Law 103-150 is heavily flawed, or filled with erroneous ‘Facts’ or lies, lies, lies.
The historical evidence is being worked on disputing the United States claimed facts with evidence.
2010 Update: Evidence has been found, much has been recorded in books, articles, and on the news on the web IOLANI – The Royal Hawk which has 276 issues to date, publisher, researcher, writer includes many and author Amelia Gora.
42. Affidavit/Lien No. 96-177455 filed on 12/17/96 (281 pages) filed at the Bureau of Conveyances, Honolulu, Hawaii with issues of ownership of Hawaii’s lands, 133 islands; conspiracies/piracies discovered – examples, Pacific Cable Co.; genealogies; Queen Liliuokalani’s claim that she did not sign a Trust deed, etc.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
FACTS FOUND: Documented in Affidavit/Lien No. 96-177455 on 12/17/96 (281 pages) at the Bureau of Conveyances on 12/17/96 (filer: Amelia Kuulei Gora, address, Mililani, Hawaii 96789) Cost $25 to file, shortly after the State of Hawaii changed their fees to $25 per page up to a certain amount, then a lesser fee is charged. Cost to copy $.50 per page and $.50 to certify each page.
A copy of the Affidavit/Lien was left at the Aiea Copy Service, Aiea Shopping Center, Aiea, Oahu, Hawaii, under the Hawaiian Genealogy Society file folder.
The reason: so that many aboriginal Hawaiians, friends would not have to pay $300 + per copy as some have paid in the past. Cost is their printing cost only.
2010 Update: The file was removed from the Aiea Copy Service since 2007.
43. Jurisdiction not granted to the U.S., the State; the City and County(ies) governments in Hawaii, including the coral reefs, islands, islets in Letters to the U.S. Presidents Clinton and GW Bush – 2003 – present.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
FACTS FOUND: Our families claimed the coral reefs, the oceans, fisheries in 1832.
The following are testimonies of the Facts: “ Owners exist. Kamehameha’s descendants exist. Royal persons exist, not subject to the laws. It is not our problem that the U.S. backed or assisted documented conspirators/Terrorists in Hawaii. References: Victoria Kamamalu’s Probate – First Circuit Court
44. Oppositions to the ‘A kaka’ – Daniel Akaka and Daniel Inouye’s Bill seeking to set up a native Hawaiian government, likened to the American Indians, destroy all the Kingdom of Hawaii records, transfer all the lands to the United States government and imprison researchers – 2001 to present.
The ‘Entity’/ Provisional Government turned Republic of Hawaii, turned Territory of the United States turned State of Hawaii (with Oppositions):
FACTS FOUND: Criminal Issues, Conspiracies involving the U.S., Great Britain, etc. has been found. Parts have been posted. More to come.
45. 2005-2010 – Many affidavits/liens/notices have been filed by our families, cousin Keoua Gora and myself which affects the properties of our Royal families, archipelago, resources, lands, assets, the Crown Lands, etc.
aloha.
2010 update/editor note: This was written in 2005……….since then, additional information has been found that our Queen and people were under duress. stress. coercion, usurpation, etc……….due to the arrival of the military a day PRIOR to the dethronement with a gatling gun, etc.
Refer to article that I’ve posted previously……….then, print all and keep with your important files.
Also print WHAT EVERY KANAKA MAOLI NEEDS TO KNOW, and other important information intended to inform others that although Hawaii is the Criminal Mecca of the United States, it is important to remember that we maintain a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation that has been recorded as having gone “under ground”.
We continue to maintain Queen Liliuokalani’s instructions, and continue to state that the Provisional government which evolved into the Republic, Territory and State are neither de facto nor de jure but an entity.
Queen Liliuokalani and her subjects were under duress which means all is null and void.
Queen Liliuokalani maintained that the U.S. breached the Law of Nations.
To put it plainly, and to repeat what other kanaka maoli/aboriginal Hawaiians have been saying and documenting, “Hawaii IS A FAKE State!”
It is necessary that we the aboriginal Hawaiians – as Queen Liliuokalani identified us to be………or kanaka maoli as our tutus identified themselves to be according to the CENSUS records prior to the wrongful, criminal dethronement of our Queen —see the question on the CENSUS records “Are you a kanaka maoli” —our tutus answered “YES”.
Evidence of our Alii are nearly in place….
Evidence of our Konohiki are nearly in place…..
Evidence for All our aboriginal Hawaiian people are hereby documented and recorded in the Kingdom of Hawaii Records No. 2010-0009.
***************************************
Note: Certain Lame lambs don't seem to understand that the Crown Lands are part of the "CONFISCATORY IN NATURE" ---nice wording for AMERICAN MAFIA dealings......or PIRATES OF THE PACIFIC: Charles Reed Bishop and Friends, and those who perpetuate the crimes of the past.........in other words ALL HAWAIIAN HOMES participants, etc. who have signed away their interests by signing the contract with the Hawaiian Homes.........see below:
from Eric Poohina:
|
Inresponse to Earl Arakai letter dated 11/19, Staradvertiser,
Homelands Get Tax Break.
Ignorant settlers from asia and the USA know little of the
political history of Hawaii but consistently give their
uneducated public opinions.
Hawaiians who reside on Hawaiian Homelands don't own the land
that their houses are on because they signed a lease.
In the lease they relinquished their claims to the original
Crown lands also known as Ceded lands.
RESERVING UNTO THE LESSOR THE FOLLOWING, is the clause in
the Dept. of Hawaiian Home Lands lease where Hawaiian homesteaders
signed off their mineral, natural resources, water rights,
sovereign rights
and all claims to the demised lands to the state of Hawaii.
The Hawaiian Homesteads are technically Indian Reservations
and the Hawaiians residing on the Homesteads are Indians
as defined under American Indian Law.
They signed off their claims to their cultural lands.
So that is the reason why homesteaders dont pay property tax.
The State of Hawaii is only in a managerial position realtive
to the Crown lands. The legal owners stipulated within the
Great Mahele Hawaiian land Tenure System of 1848 are the descendants
of King Kekaulike and King Kamehameha I.
Research , Kamehameha's Children Living Today by Charles Ahlo,
The U.S. Hawaiian Apology Law 103-150 of 1993,
the 2009 State Supreme Court Ruling on the Ceded lands, (CIV. NO
94-4207),
the 2009 U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on the Ceded lands, (NO. 07-1372),
and 2009 State of Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals case
Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 (No. 28175) all acknowledge the fact
that Hawaiians with the genealogy connection still have a legitimate
claim
to the Kuleana, Konohiki, Ali'i Private Estate Trust Lands and Crown
lands
also known as Ceded lands.
The Great Mahele of 1848 is alive and well!
Eric Po'ohina
po box 744
kailua hi 96734
ph# 348-7550
aumakua@aloha.net
-
*************************Note to everyone:1) The Supreme Court Justices admitted that the Crown Lands were "CONFISCATORY IN NATURE",2)Eric Poohina pointed out:Ignorant settlers from asia and the USA know little of the
political history of Hawaii but consistently give their
uneducated public opinions.
Hawaiians who reside on Hawaiian Homelands don't own the land
that their houses are on because they signed a lease.
In the lease they relinquished their claims to the original
Crown lands also known as Ceded lands.
RESERVING UNTO THE LESSOR THE FOLLOWING, is the clause in
the Dept. of Hawaiian Home Lands lease where Hawaiian homesteaders
signed off their mineral, natural resources, water rights,
sovereign rights
and all claims to the demised lands to the state of Hawaii.
The Hawaiian Homesteads are technically Indian Reservations
and the Hawaiians residing on the Homesteads are Indians
as defined under American Indian Law.
They signed off their claims to their cultural lands.
So that is the reason why homesteaders dont pay property tax.
The State of Hawaii is only in a managerial position realtive
to the Crown lands. The legal owners stipulated within the
Great Mahele Hawaiian land Tenure System of 1848 are the descendants
of King Kekaulike and King Kamehameha I.
Research , Kamehameha's Children Living Today by Charles Ahlo,
The U.S. Hawaiian Apology Law 103-150 of 1993,
the 2009 State Supreme Court Ruling on the Ceded lands, (CIV. NO
94-4207),
the 2009 U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on the Ceded lands, (NO. 07-1372),
and 2009 State of Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals case
Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 (No. 28175) all acknowledge the fact
that Hawaiians with the genealogy connection still have a legitimate
claim
to the Kuleana, Konohiki, Ali'i Private Estate Trust Lands and Crown
lands
also known as Ceded lands.
The Great Mahele of 1848 is alive and well!3) Eric Poohina and I did an OLELO-TV Show Called the TRUE CEDED LAND OWNERS4) The CROWN LANDS OWNERS exists.....who happens to be the descendants and heirs of Kamehameha, Kamehameha III - Kauikeouli, et. als., along with the descendants and heirs of the House of Nobles who represent the two (2) permanent parts (3 parts make up the Hawaiian Government) of the Hawaiian Government.5) Premeditation evidence held by many which also shows that the U.S. A. was involved in conspiring against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.6) Many have been indoctrinated, suck in the depleted uranium at a close proximity and seems to have been affected by the toxins, etc. or are victims of mind control:aloha.
Replies